Safety Zone; Lynch Wedding Fireworks Display, Marblehead, MA, 43973-43975 [E6-12529]
Download as PDF
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 149 / Thursday, August 3, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
each date on which the amount of
redemption proceeds to be paid for the
redemption of a trust interest is
determined, information that will
enable requesting persons to determine
the redemption proceeds per trust
interest on that date. The trustee also
must provide requesting persons with a
statement that this paragraph applies to
the NMWHFIT.
(2) NMWHFITs that qualify for the
exception. This paragraph (c)(2)(v)(C)
applies to a NMWHFIT if substantially
all the income of the NMWHFIT
consists of dividends (as defined in
section 6042(b) and the regulations
thereunder) and the NMWHFIT satisfies
either paragraph (c)(2)(v)(C)(2)(i) or (ii)
of this section. Trust sales proceeds and
gross proceeds from a sale described in
paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(G) of this section are
ignored for the purpose of determining
if substantially all of a NMWHFIT’s
income consists of dividends.
(i) The trustee is required by the
governing document of the NMWHFIT
to determine and distribute all cash held
for distribution (as defined in paragraph
(b)(5) of this section) no less frequently
than monthly. A NMWHFIT will be
considered to have satisfied this
paragraph (c)(2)(v)(C)(2)(i)
notwithstanding that the governing
document of the NMWHFIT permits the
trustee to forego making a required
monthly or more frequent distribution,
if the cash held for distribution is less
than 0.1% of the aggregate net asset
value of the trust as of the date specified
in the governing document for
calculating the amount of the monthly
distribution.
(ii) The qualified NMWHFIT
exception of paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(E) of
this section is satisfied.
(vi) Information regarding bond
premium. The trustee generally must
report information that enables a
beneficial owner to determine, in any
manner that is reasonably consistent
with section 171, the amount of the
beneficial owner’s amortizable bond
premium, if any, for each calendar year.
However, if a NMWHFIT meets the
general de minimis test of paragraph
(c)(2)(iv)(D)(1) of this section, the
qualified NMWHFIT exception of
paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(E) of this section, or
the NMWHFIT final calendar year
exception of paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(F) of
this section, the trustee of such
NMWHFIT is not required to report
information regarding bond premium.
(vii) Information regarding market
discount. The trustee generally must
report information that enables a
beneficial owner to determine, in any
manner reasonably consistent with
section 1276 (including section
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Aug 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
1276(a)(3)), the amount of market
discount that has accrued during the
calendar year. However, if a NMWHFIT
meets the general de minimis test of
paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(D)(1) of this section,
the qualified NMWHFIT exception of
paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(E) of this section,
NMWHFIT final calendar year
exception of paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(F) of
this section, the trustee of such
NMWHFIT is not required to provide
information regarding market discount.
(c)(3) through (f)(1)(i) [Reserved.] For
further guidance, see § 1.671–5(c)(3)
through (e)(4).
(f) Safe harbor for providing
information for certain NMWHFITs—(1)
Safe harbor for trustee reporting of
NMWHFIT information. The trustee of a
NMWHFIT that meets the requirements
of paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this section is
deemed to satisfy paragraph (c)(1)(i) of
this section, if the trustee calculates and
provides WHFIT information in the
manner described in this paragraph (f)
and provides a statement to a requesting
person giving notice that information
has been calculated in accordance with
this paragraph (f)(1).
(i) In general—(A) Eligibility to report
under this safe harbor. Only
NMWHFITs that meet the requirements
set forth in paragraphs (f)(1)(i)(A)(1) and
(2) of this section may report under this
safe harbor. For purposes of determining
whether paragraph (f)(1)(i)(A)(1) of this
section is met, trust sales proceeds and
gross proceeds from sales described in
paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(G) of this section are
ignored:
(1) Substantially all of the
NMWHFIT’s income is from dividends
or interest; and
(2) All trust interests have identical
value and rights.
(f)(1)(i)(B) through (f)(vii) [Reserved.]
For further guidance, see § 1.671–
5(f)(1)(i)(B) through (f)(vii).
(viii) Reporting market discount
information under the safe harbor—(A)
In general. If the trustee of a NMWHFIT
is required to provide information
regarding market discount under
paragraph (c)(2)(vii) of this section, the
trustee must provide the information
required under § 1.671–
5(f)(1)(iv)(A)(1)(iii) of this section. If the
trustee is not required to provide market
discount information under paragraph
(c)(2)(vii) of this section (because
paragraph (c)(2)(iv) of this section
applies to the NMWHFIT), the trustee is
not required under this paragraph (f) to
provide any information regarding
market discount.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43973
(f)(1)(viii)(B) through (m) [Reserved.]
For further guidance, see § 1.671–
5(f)(1)(viii)(B) through (m).
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: July 28, 2006.
Eric Solomon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 06–6649 Filed 7–28–06; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD01–06–061]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Lynch Wedding
Fireworks Display, Marblehead, MA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
the Lynch Wedding Fireworks display
on August 5, 2006 in Marblehead,
Massachusetts, temporarily closing all
waters of the Atlantic Ocean between
Marblehead Neck and Marblehead Rock
in the vicinity of Lasque Ledge within
a four hundred (400) yard radius of the
fireworks barges located at approximate
positions 42°30.142′ N, 070°49.813′ W
and 42°30.146′ N, 070°49.733′ W. This
zone is necessary to protect the
maritime public from the potential
hazards posed by a fireworks display.
The safety zone temporarily prohibits
entry into or movement within this
portion of the Atlantic Ocean during its
closure period. Entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Boston,
Massachusetts or the COTP’s designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:30
p.m. until 10 p.m. on August 5, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket [CGD01–06–
061] and are available for inspection or
copying at Sector Boston, 427
Commercial Street, Boston, MA,
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chief Petty Officer Paul English, Sector
Boston, Waterways Management
Division, at (617) 223–5456.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
43974
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 149 / Thursday, August 3, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM because the
logistics with respect to the fireworks
presentation were not presented to the
Coast Guard with sufficient time to draft
and publish an NPRM. Any delay
encountered in this regulation’s
effective date would be contrary to the
public interest since the safety zone is
needed to prevent traffic from transiting
a portion of Atlantic Ocean between
Marblehead Neck and Marblehead Rock
in the vicinity of Lasque Ledge during
the fireworks display and to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that for the same reasons
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. The
zone should have a minimal negative
impact on vessel transits in the Atlantic
Ocean between Marblehead Neck and
Marblehead Rock in the vicinity of
Lasque Ledge because vessels will be
excluded from the area for only two and
one half hours, and vessels can still
safely operate in other areas of the ocean
during the event.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Background and Purpose
The Lynch Family is holding a
fireworks display to celebrate a
wedding. This rule establishes a
temporary safety zone on the waters of
the Atlantic Ocean between Marblehead
Neck and Marblehead Rock in the
vicinity of Lasque Ledge within a four
hundred (400) yard radius of the
fireworks barges located at approximate
positions 42°30.142′ N, 070°49.813′ W
and 42°30.146′ N, 070°49.733′ W. This
safety zone is necessary to protect the
life and property of the maritime public
from the potential dangers posed by this
event. It will protect the public by
prohibiting entry into or movement
within the proscribed portion of the
Atlantic Ocean during the fireworks
display.
Marine traffic may transit safely
outside of the zone during the effective
period. The Captain of the Port does not
anticipate any negative impact on vessel
traffic due to this event. Public
notifications will be made prior to and
during the effective period via safety
marine information broadcasts and
Local Notice to Mariners.
Discussion of Rule
This rule is effective from 7:30 p.m.
until 10 p.m. on August 5, 2006. Marine
traffic may transit safely outside of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Aug 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
safety zone in the majority of the
Atlantic Ocean during the event. Given
the limited time-frame of the effective
period of the zone, and the actual size
of the zone with respect to the amount
of navigable water around it, the
Captain of the Port anticipates minimal
negative impact on vessel traffic due to
this event. Public notifications will be
made prior to and during the effective
period via Local Notice to Mariners and
marine information broadcasts.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory evaluation is unnecessary.
Although this rule will prevent traffic
from transiting a portion of the Atlantic
Ocean between Marblehead Neck and
Marblehead Rock in the vicinity of
Lasque Ledge during this event, the
effect of this rule will not be significant
for several reasons: Vessels will be
excluded from the area of the safety
zone for only two and one half hours,
although vessels will not be able to
transit the area in the vicinity of the
zone, they will be able to operate in
other areas of the ocean during the
effective period; and advance
notifications will be made to the local
maritime community by marine
information broadcasts and Local Notice
to Mariners.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the Atlantic Ocean between
Marblehead Neck and Marblehead Rock
in the vicinity of Lasque Ledge from
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on August 5,
2006. This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the reason described under the
Regulatory Evaluation section.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under subsection 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 [Pub. L. 104–121],
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process. If
this rule will affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call Chief Petty
Officer Paul English, Sector Boston,
Waterways Management Division, at
(617) 223–5456.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 149 / Thursday, August 3, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule
fits the category selected from paragraph
(34)(g), as it would establish a safety
zone.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
Dated: July 24, 2006.
James L. McDonald,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Boston, Massachusetts.
[FR Doc. E6–12529 Filed 8–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
I
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
33 CFR Part 165
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
[CGD01–06–037]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Safety Zone; Yankee Homecoming
Fireworks, Newburyport, MA
I
2. Add temporary § 165.T06–061 to
read as follows:
I
Technical Standards
16:16 Aug 02, 2006
Environment
Neck and Marblehead Rock in the
vicinity of Lasque Ledge within a four
hundred (400) yard radius of the
fireworks barges located at approximate
positions 42°30.142′ N, 070°49.813′ W
and 42°30.146′ N, 070°49.733′ W.
(b) Effective Date. This rule is
effective from 7:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on
August 5, 2006.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section
Designated representative means a Coast
Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or
other officer operating a Coast Guard
vessel and a Federal, State, and local
officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port (COTP).
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with the general regulations in 165.23 of
this part, entry into or movement within
this zone by any person or vessel is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP), Boston or
the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP or
the COTP’s designated representative.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Energy Effects
VerDate Aug<31>2005
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
43975
§ 165.T–01–061 Safety Zone; Lynch
Wedding Fireworks Display, Marblehead,
Ma.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone:
All waters of the Atlantic Ocean, from
surface to bottom between Marblehead
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RIN 1625–AA00
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
the Yankee Homecoming Fireworks
display to be held on August 5, 2006 in
Newburyport, Massachusetts. The zone
temporarily closes all waters of the
Merrimack River within a four hundred
(400) yard radius of the fireworks
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 149 (Thursday, August 3, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43973-43975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12529]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD01-06-061]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Lynch Wedding Fireworks Display, Marblehead, MA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
the Lynch Wedding Fireworks display on August 5, 2006 in Marblehead,
Massachusetts, temporarily closing all waters of the Atlantic Ocean
between Marblehead Neck and Marblehead Rock in the vicinity of Lasque
Ledge within a four hundred (400) yard radius of the fireworks barges
located at approximate positions 42[deg]30.142' N, 070[deg]49.813' W
and 42[deg]30.146' N, 070[deg]49.733' W. This zone is necessary to
protect the maritime public from the potential hazards posed by a
fireworks display. The safety zone temporarily prohibits entry into or
movement within this portion of the Atlantic Ocean during its closure
period. Entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Boston, Massachusetts or the COTP's designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on August 5,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket [CGD01-06-061] and are available for
inspection or copying at Sector Boston, 427 Commercial Street, Boston,
MA, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Petty Officer Paul English,
Sector Boston, Waterways Management Division, at (617) 223-5456.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 43974]]
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM because the logistics with
respect to the fireworks presentation were not presented to the Coast
Guard with sufficient time to draft and publish an NPRM. Any delay
encountered in this regulation's effective date would be contrary to
the public interest since the safety zone is needed to prevent traffic
from transiting a portion of Atlantic Ocean between Marblehead Neck and
Marblehead Rock in the vicinity of Lasque Ledge during the fireworks
display and to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that for the same
reasons good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register. The zone should have a
minimal negative impact on vessel transits in the Atlantic Ocean
between Marblehead Neck and Marblehead Rock in the vicinity of Lasque
Ledge because vessels will be excluded from the area for only two and
one half hours, and vessels can still safely operate in other areas of
the ocean during the event.
Background and Purpose
The Lynch Family is holding a fireworks display to celebrate a
wedding. This rule establishes a temporary safety zone on the waters of
the Atlantic Ocean between Marblehead Neck and Marblehead Rock in the
vicinity of Lasque Ledge within a four hundred (400) yard radius of the
fireworks barges located at approximate positions 42[deg]30.142' N,
070[deg]49.813' W and 42[deg]30.146' N, 070[deg]49.733' W. This safety
zone is necessary to protect the life and property of the maritime
public from the potential dangers posed by this event. It will protect
the public by prohibiting entry into or movement within the proscribed
portion of the Atlantic Ocean during the fireworks display.
Marine traffic may transit safely outside of the zone during the
effective period. The Captain of the Port does not anticipate any
negative impact on vessel traffic due to this event. Public
notifications will be made prior to and during the effective period via
safety marine information broadcasts and Local Notice to Mariners.
Discussion of Rule
This rule is effective from 7:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on August 5,
2006. Marine traffic may transit safely outside of the safety zone in
the majority of the Atlantic Ocean during the event. Given the limited
time-frame of the effective period of the zone, and the actual size of
the zone with respect to the amount of navigable water around it, the
Captain of the Port anticipates minimal negative impact on vessel
traffic due to this event. Public notifications will be made prior to
and during the effective period via Local Notice to Mariners and marine
information broadcasts.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory evaluation is unnecessary. Although this rule will
prevent traffic from transiting a portion of the Atlantic Ocean between
Marblehead Neck and Marblehead Rock in the vicinity of Lasque Ledge
during this event, the effect of this rule will not be significant for
several reasons: Vessels will be excluded from the area of the safety
zone for only two and one half hours, although vessels will not be able
to transit the area in the vicinity of the zone, they will be able to
operate in other areas of the ocean during the effective period; and
advance notifications will be made to the local maritime community by
marine information broadcasts and Local Notice to Mariners.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of the Atlantic Ocean between Marblehead
Neck and Marblehead Rock in the vicinity of Lasque Ledge from 7:30 p.m.
until 10 p.m. on August 5, 2006. This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the reason described under the Regulatory Evaluation section.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under subsection 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 [Pub. L. 104-121], we want to assist
small entities in understanding this rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
If this rule will affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please call Chief Petty Officer
Paul English, Sector Boston, Waterways Management Division, at (617)
223-5456.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the
[[Page 43975]]
effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. This rule fits the category selected from paragraph
(34)(g), as it would establish a safety zone.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T06-061 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T-01-061 Safety Zone; Lynch Wedding Fireworks Display,
Marblehead, Ma.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone:
All waters of the Atlantic Ocean, from surface to bottom between
Marblehead Neck and Marblehead Rock in the vicinity of Lasque Ledge
within a four hundred (400) yard radius of the fireworks barges located
at approximate positions 42[deg]30.142' N, 070[deg]49.813' W and
42[deg]30.146' N, 070[deg]49.733' W.
(b) Effective Date. This rule is effective from 7:30 p.m. until 10
p.m. on August 5, 2006.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section Designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port (COTP).
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
165.23 of this part, entry into or movement within this zone by any
person or vessel is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP), Boston or the COTP's designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or the COTP's designated representative to
obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter
or operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
Dated: July 24, 2006.
James L. McDonald,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Boston, Massachusetts.
[FR Doc. E6-12529 Filed 8-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P