National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List, 43984-43985 [E6-12446]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
43984
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 149 / Thursday, August 3, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Aug 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by October 2, 2006.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: July 14, 2006.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E6–12483 Filed 8–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL–8205–1]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance
Pollution Contingency Plan; National
Priorities List
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Technical Correction of final
partial deletion of the Motor Wheel
Disposal Superfund Site from the
National Priorities List.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On June 23, 2006 (70 FR
36019) EPA published a technical
correction to a final notice of deletion
from the National Priorities List for the
Motor Wheel, Lansing, Michigan Site.
The technical correction had an error in
the amendatory language. This action is
correcting this error.
DATES: Effective Date: This action is
effective as of August 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comprehensive information
on the Site, as well as the comments
that were received during the comment
period are available at: Robert Paulson,
Community Involvement Coordinator,
U.S. EPA, P19J, 77 W. Jackson, Chicago,
IL, (312) 886–0272 or 1–800–621–8431.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gladys Beard, State NPL Deletion
Process Manager, U.S. EPA (SR–6J), 77
W. Jackson, Chicago, IL 60604, (312)
886–7253 or 1–800–621–8431.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Information Repositories: Repositories
have been established to provide
detailed information concerning this
decision at the following address: U.S.
EPA Region V, 77 W. Jackson, Chicago,
IL 60604, (312) 353–5821, Monday
through Friday 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.; The
Lansing Public Library, Reference
Section, 401 Capital Ave., Lansing, MI
48933. On June 22, 2000 (65 FR 38806),
EPA published a ‘‘Notice of intent to
delete 3.45 acres of land from the Motor
Wheel Disposal Site from the National
Priorities List; request for comments,’’
and on June 22, 2000 (65 FR 38774), a
‘‘Direct final notice of deletion for 3.45
acres of land for the Motor Wheel
Superfund Site from the National
Priorities List (NPL).’’ The EPA is
publishing this Technical Correction to
the June 22, 2000, final notice of
deletion due to errors that were
published in that notice, a subsequent
technical correction dated June 23,
2006, and in the National Priorities List
at 40 CFR part 300, Appendix B. After
review of the final notice of deletion
and the National Priorities List, EPA is
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
43985
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 149 / Thursday, August 3, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
publishing this Technical Correction
today to change the word ‘‘revising’’ in
the June 23, 2006 Direct final notice of
deletion to the word ‘‘adding’’ and to
amend 40 CFR part 300, Appendix B by
adding the Motor Wheel, Lansing,
Michigan, and inserting a ‘‘P’’ in the
Notes(a) column for the Motor Wheel
Site, Lansing, Michigan. EPA will place
a copy of the final partial deletion
package in the site repositories.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
substances, Hazardous waste,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923;
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Dated: July 24, 2006.
Norman Neidergang,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region
V.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
40 CFR part 300 is amended as follows:
I 2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300
is amended under Michigan ‘‘MI’’ by
adding the entry for ‘‘Motor Wheel’’ to
read as follows:
I
Appendix B to Part 300—National
Priorities List
TABLE 1.—GENERAL SUPERFUND SECTION
State
Site
name
*
*
MI .................................................................
*
*
Motor Wheel ...............................................
*
*
*
City/
County
*
Notes a
*
*
*
Lansing ....................................................... P
*
*
*
a
* * *
P = Sites with partial deletions.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–12446 Filed 8–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 594
[Docket No. NHTSA 2006–24128; Notice 3]
RIN 2127–AJ87
Schedule of Fees Authorized by 49
U.S.C. 30141
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document adopts fees for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 and until further
notice, as authorized by 49 U.S.C.
30141, relating to the registration of
importers and the importation of motor
vehicles not certified as conforming to
the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards (FMVSS). These fees are
needed to maintain the registered
importer (RI) program.
We are decreasing the fees for the
registration of a new RI from $830 to
$677 and the annual fee for renewing an
existing registration from $745 to $570.
These fees include the costs of
maintaining the RI program. The fee
required to reimburse the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security
(Customs) for conformance bond
processing costs will increase from
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Aug 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
$9.30 to $9.77 per bond. We are also
increasing the fees assessed against the
importer of each vehicle covered by the
decision to grant import eligibility. For
vehicles determined eligible based on
their substantial similarity to a U.S.
certified vehicle, the fee is increased
from $150 to $208. For vehicles
determined eligible based on their
capability of being modified to comply
with all applicable FMVSS, the fee is
increased from $150 to $208. In the
event that a petitioner requests an
inspection of a vehicle, the fee for such
an inspection will remain $827 for
vehicles that are the subject of either
type of petition. The fee that an RI must
pay as a processing cost for review of
each conformity package that it submits
to NHTSA will decrease to $13 from $18
per certificate. If the vehicle has been
entered electronically with Customs
through the Automated Broker Interface
(ABI) and the registered importer has an
e-mail address, the fee for processing
the conformity package will continue to
be $6, provided the fee is paid by credit
card. However, if NHTSA finds that the
information in the entry or the
conformity package is incorrect, the
processing fee will be $48, representing
no change from the fee that is currently
charged when there are one or more
errors in the ABI entry or omissions in
the statement of conformity.
The amendments established by
this final rule will become effective on
October 1, 2006, the beginning of FY
2007. Petitions for reconsideration must
be received by NHTSA not later than
September 18, 2006.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Petitions for reconsideration
of this final rule should refer to the
docket and notice numbers identified
above and be submitted to:
Administrator, National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590. It is requested, but not required,
that 10 copies of the petition be
submitted. The petition must be
received not later than 45 days after
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. Petitions filed after
that time will be considered petitions
filed by interested persons to initiate
rulemaking pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301.
The petition must contain a brief
statement of the complaint and an
explanation as to why compliance with
the final rule is not practicable, is
unreasonable, or is not in the public
interest. Unless otherwise specified in
the final rule, the statement and
explanation together may not exceed 15
pages in length, but necessary
attachments may be appended to the
submission without regard to the 15page limit. If it is requested that
additional facts be considered, the
petitioner must state the reason why
they were not presented to the
Administrator within the prescribed
time. The Administrator does not
consider repetitious petitions and
unless the Administrator otherwise
provides, the filing of a petition does
not stay the effectiveness of the final
rule.
ADDRESSES:
For
legal issues: Michael Goode, Office of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\03AUR1.SGM
03AUR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 149 (Thursday, August 3, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43984-43985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12446]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL-8205-1]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Technical Correction of final partial deletion of the Motor
Wheel Disposal Superfund Site from the National Priorities List.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On June 23, 2006 (70 FR 36019) EPA published a technical
correction to a final notice of deletion from the National Priorities
List for the Motor Wheel, Lansing, Michigan Site. The technical
correction had an error in the amendatory language. This action is
correcting this error.
DATES: Effective Date: This action is effective as of August 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comprehensive information on the Site, as well as the
comments that were received during the comment period are available at:
Robert Paulson, Community Involvement Coordinator, U.S. EPA, P19J, 77
W. Jackson, Chicago, IL, (312) 886-0272 or 1-800-621-8431.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gladys Beard, State NPL Deletion
Process Manager, U.S. EPA (SR-6J), 77 W. Jackson, Chicago, IL 60604,
(312) 886-7253 or 1-800-621-8431.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Information Repositories: Repositories have
been established to provide detailed information concerning this
decision at the following address: U.S. EPA Region V, 77 W. Jackson,
Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 353-5821, Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 4
p.m.; The Lansing Public Library, Reference Section, 401 Capital Ave.,
Lansing, MI 48933. On June 22, 2000 (65 FR 38806), EPA published a
``Notice of intent to delete 3.45 acres of land from the Motor Wheel
Disposal Site from the National Priorities List; request for
comments,'' and on June 22, 2000 (65 FR 38774), a ``Direct final notice
of deletion for 3.45 acres of land for the Motor Wheel Superfund Site
from the National Priorities List (NPL).'' The EPA is publishing this
Technical Correction to the June 22, 2000, final notice of deletion due
to errors that were published in that notice, a subsequent technical
correction dated June 23, 2006, and in the National Priorities List at
40 CFR part 300, Appendix B. After review of the final notice of
deletion and the National Priorities List, EPA is
[[Page 43985]]
publishing this Technical Correction today to change the word
``revising'' in the June 23, 2006 Direct final notice of deletion to
the word ``adding'' and to amend 40 CFR part 300, Appendix B by adding
the Motor Wheel, Lansing, Michigan, and inserting a ``P'' in the
Notes(a) column for the Motor Wheel Site, Lansing, Michigan. EPA will
place a copy of the final partial deletion package in the site
repositories.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923; 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Dated: July 24, 2006.
Norman Neidergang,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region V.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, 40 CFR part 300 is amended as
follows:
0
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300 is amended under Michigan ``MI''
by adding the entry for ``Motor Wheel'' to read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 300--National Priorities List
Table 1.--General Superfund Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Site name City/ County Notes \a\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
MI.................................... Motor Wheel.............. Lansing................. P
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ * * *
P = Sites with partial deletions.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-12446 Filed 8-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
