Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Temporary Relaxation of the Minimum Grade Requirement, 43641-43643 [E6-12410]
Download as PDF
43641
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 148
Wednesday, August 2, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. FV06–922–2 IFR]
Apricots Grown in Designated
Counties in Washington; Temporary
Relaxation of the Minimum Grade
Requirement
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule relaxes the
minimum grade requirement prescribed
under the Washington apricot marketing
order for the 2006 shipping season only.
The marketing order regulates the
handling of fresh apricots grown in
designated counties in the State of
Washington, and is administered locally
by the Washington Apricot Marketing
Committee (Committee). This rule
relaxes the minimum grade requirement
for fresh apricots from Washington No.
1 grade to Washington No. 2 grade. This
rule will enable handlers to ship more
fruit into fresh market channels, taking
into consideration hail damage caused
to Washington apricots during the
growing season. This change is expected
to increase returns to producers and to
make more fresh apricots available to
consumers.
Effective August 3, 2006, through
March 31, 2007. Comments received by
October 2, 2006 will be considered prior
to issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Aug 01, 2006
Jkt 208001
(202) 720–8938; E-mail:
moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or Internet:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours or
can be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Curry or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue,
Suite 385, Portland, Oregon 97204–
2807; Telephone: (503) 326–2724; Fax:
(503) 326–7440.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone (202) 720–
2491; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 922 (7 CFR part 922)
regulating the handling of apricots
grown in designated counties in
Washington, hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–
674), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule relaxes the minimum grade
requirement for fresh apricots from
Washington No. 1 grade to Washington
No. 2 grade. This rule will enable
handlers to ship more fruit into fresh
market channels, taking into
consideration hail damage caused to
Washington apricots during the growing
season. This change is expected to
increase returns to producers and to
make more fresh apricots available to
consumers. The minimum grade
requirement will revert to Washington
No. 1 grade on April 1, 2007, for the
2007 and future seasons.
Section 922.52 of the order authorizes
the issuance of regulations for grade,
size, quality, maturity, pack, and
container for any variety of apricots
grown in the production area. Section
922.53 further authorizes the
modification, suspension, or
termination of regulations issued
pursuant to § 922.52. Section 922.55
provides that whenever apricots are
regulated pursuant to §§ 922.52 or
922.53, such apricots must be inspected
by the Federal-State Inspection Service,
and certified as meeting the applicable
requirements of such regulations.
Minimum grade, maturity, color, and
size requirements for Washington
apricots regulated under the order are
specified in § 922.321 Apricot
Regulation 21. Section 922.321
provides, in part, that no handler shall
handle any container of apricots unless
such apricots grade not less than
Washington No. 1, except for shipments
subject to exemption under the
regulation. In addition, the section
provides that the Moorpark variety in
open containers must be generally well
matured. That section also provides
that, with the exception of exempt
shipments, apricots must be at least
reasonably uniform in color, and be not
less than 15⁄8 inches in diameter, except
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
43642
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 2, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
for the Blenheim, Blenril, and Tilton
varieties which must be not less than
11⁄4 inches in diameter. Individual
shipments of apricots are exempt from
these requirements if sold for home use
only, do not, in the aggregate, exceed
500 pounds net weight, and each
container is stamped or marked with the
words ‘‘not for resale.’’
This rule revises paragraph (a)(1) of
§ 922.321 by temporarily changing the
minimum grade requirement for fresh
shipments of apricots from Washington
No. 1 to Washington No. 2 for the 2006
season only. The Washington No. 1
minimum grade requirement will
resume April 1, 2007, for the 2007
season and future seasons.
Based on a request from a handler
representing several producers, the
Committee recommended by a vote of
nine to one that the grade requirement
be relaxed for the 2006 season to
facilitate the handling of fruit damaged
by hail. The Committee requested that
this relaxation be effective by the
beginning of the 2006 Washington
apricot shipping season, which is
expected to be around July 1, 2006.
The Committee meets prior to and
during each season to consider
recommendations for modification,
suspension, or termination of the
regulatory requirements for Washington
apricots which have been issued on a
continuing basis. Committee meetings
are open to the public and interested
persons may express their views at these
meetings. The USDA reviews
information submitted by, and
recommendations from, the Committee
and other available information to
determine whether modification,
suspension, or termination of the
regulatory requirements would tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
The Committee has conveyed to
USDA that widely scattered hail damage
was reported within the Washington
apricot production area as a result of
late spring storms. The severe weather
conditions resulted in damage to the
crop making it difficult for apricots to
meet the minimum grade requirements
of Washington No. 1. The Committee’s
original crop estimate for the 2006
season was established at 5,000 tons.
With the full extent of hail damage
unknown at this time, the Committee
has not established a revised crop
estimate. However, taking into account
the reported damage, this rule provides
for the handling of a larger portion of
the Washington apricot crop this season
than would be allowed if the minimum
grade requirement were to remain at
Washington No. 1. Relaxation of the
grade requirement for the 2006
Washington apricot crop is intended to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Aug 01, 2006
Jkt 208001
increase fresh shipments to meet
consumer needs and improve returns to
producers.
This rule relaxes the grade
requirement specified in § 922.321. This
rule will not effect the color and
minimum size requirements for all
varieties or the well matured
requirements for the Moorpark variety.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 300 apricot
producers within the regulated
production area and approximately 22
regulated handlers. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $6,500,000.
For the 2005 apricot shipping season,
the Washington Agricultural Statistics
Service prepared a preliminary report
showing that the total 5,600 ton apricot
utilization sold for an average of $997
per ton. Based on the number of
producers in the production area (300),
the average annual producer revenue
from the sale of apricots in 2005 can
thus be estimated at approximately
$18,611.
Average revenue per handler can be
estimated using f.o.b. prices. According
to USDA’s Market News Service, 2005
fresh apricot f.o.b. prices ranged from
$15.00 to $20.00 per 24-pound loosepack container, and from $14.00 to
$24.00 for 2-layer tray pack containers
(which weigh an average of about 20
pounds each). Total apricot sales
revenue at the f.o.b. shipper level can be
estimated by taking the midpoints of
each of the two ranges ($17.50 and
$19.00) as representative annual average
prices for each of the container types.
The 2005 season fresh apricot pack-out
of 4,471 tons can be assumed to be
equally divided between the two
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
container types, yielding an estimated
quantity packed in each container type
of 2235.5 tons, or 4.471 million pounds.
Dividing this quantity by the pounds
per container yields the following
handler sales revenue estimates: (a)
186,292 24-pound loose-pack
containers, with an average price of
$17.50, valued at $3,260,110 and (b)
223,550 two-layer tray pack containers,
with an average price of $19.00, valued
at $4,246,500. Combining the estimated
handler sales revenue for the two
container types ($7,506,610) and
dividing by the number of handlers (22)
yields an annual average fresh apricot
sales revenue estimate per handler of
$341,210. Since this figure is well under
$750,000 (the SBA definition of the
minimum sales of a large agricultural
service firm), it is reasonable to assume
that the majority of producers and
handlers of Washington apricots may be
classified as small entities.
This rule revises paragraph (a)(1) of
§ 922.321 by temporarily changing the
minimum grade requirement for fresh
shipments of apricots from Washington
No. 1 to Washington No. 2 for the 2006
season only. The Washington No. 1
minimum grade requirement will
resume April 1, 2007, for the 2007
season and future seasons. Section
922.52 of the order authorizes the
issuance of regulations for grade, size,
quality, maturity, pack, and container
for any variety of apricots grown in the
production area. Section 922.53 further
authorizes the modification, suspension,
or termination of regulations issued
pursuant to § 922.52.
The Committee anticipates that this
rule will not negatively impact small
businesses. This rule relaxes the
minimum grade requirement in the
order’s handling regulations and should
provide enhanced marketing
opportunities.
Given the emergency nature of the
relaxation, the Committee’s
recommendation was made via the voteby-mail procedures of the order. With
ten of the twelve members responding,
nine members supported the temporary
grade change and one member opposed
it. The only alternative to a grade
relaxation offered on the ballot was to
leave the minimum grade at Washington
No. 1, which was not adopted.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
apricot handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 2, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
AMS is committed to compliance
with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires
Government agencies in general to
provide the public the option of
submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible.
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on
relaxation of the minimum grade
requirement under the Washington
apricot marketing order. Any comments
received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Committee’s recommendation, and
other information, it is found that the
minimum grade requirement in
§ 922.321 should be temporarily relaxed
from Washington No. 1 grade to
Washington No. 2 grade in order to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule relaxes the
minimum grade requirement for
Washington apricots for the 2006
shipping season; (2) Washington apricot
handlers are aware of this
recommendations and need no
additional time to comply with the
relaxed requirements; (3) this rule
should be in effect as close as possible
to July 1, 2006, the date shipments of
the 2006 Washington apricot crop are
expected to begin; and (4) this rule
provides a 60-day comment period, and
any comments received will be
considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR Part 922 is amended as
follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Aug 01, 2006
Jkt 208001
PART 922—APRICOTS GROWN IN
DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN
WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
Part 922 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
§ 922.321
[Amended]
2. Section 922.321 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as
follows:
(a) * * *
(1) Minimum grade and maturity
requirements. Such apricots that grade
not less than Washington No. 1 and are
at least reasonably uniform in color:
Provided, That during the period July 1,
2006, through March 31, 2007, the
minimum grade requirement for such
apricots shall be not less than
Washington No. 2; Provided further,
That such apricots of the Moorpark
variety in open containers shall be
generally well matured: and
*
*
*
*
*
I
Dated: July 27, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E6–12410 Filed 8–1–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 1614
RIN 3046–AA74
Federal Sector Equal Employment
Opportunity
Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC or
Commission) is issuing a final rule
implementing the posting requirements
set forth in Title III of the Notification
and Federal Employee
Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act
of 2002 (No FEAR Act), Pub. L. 107–
174. The No FEAR Act requires a
Federal agency to post on its public Web
site summary statistical data pertaining
to complaints of employment
discrimination filed under 29 CFR part
1614 by employees, former employees
and applicants for employment. Title III
authorizes EEOC to issue rules
concerning the ‘‘time, form and
manner’’ of the postings, to define the
terms ‘‘issue’’ and ‘‘basis,’’ and to issue
any other ‘‘rules necessary to carry out’’
Title III.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DATES:
43643
Effective Date: August 2, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas J. Schlageter, Assistant Legal
Counsel, Gary John Hozempa, Senior
General Attorney, or Mona Papillon,
Senior General Attorney at (202) 663–
4669 (voice) or (202) 663–7026 (TTY).
This final rule also is available in the
following alternative formats: large
print, braille, audiotape and electronic
file on computer disk. Requests for the
final rule in an alternative format
should be made to EEOC’s Publication
Center at 1–800–669–3362 (voice), 1–
800–800–3302 (TTY), or 703–821–2098
(FAX—this is not a toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
On January 26, 2004, EEOC published
in the Federal Register an interim final
rule setting forth the time, form and
manner in which an agency shall post
summary statistical EEO complaint data.
69 FR 3483 (2004). The interim rule
included a 60-day comment period,
which subsequently was extended an
additional 30 days. 69 FR 13473 (2004).
EEOC received over 140 comments on
the interim rule. One hundred and nine
comments were submitted by persons
identifying themselves as members of
the ‘‘No FEAR Coalition.’’ Sixteen
comments were submitted by Federal
agencies and departments. Four
comments were submitted by civil
rights groups composed of Federal
employees, one was submitted by a
national civil rights group, one by an
association of Federal EEO executives,
one by a Member of Congress, and one
was submitted by an association of
Federal agency Web content managers.
EEOC also received seventeen
comments from individuals, most of
whom identified themselves as Federal
or former Federal employees.
The Commission has considered
carefully all of the comments and has
made some changes to the interim rule
in response to the comments. The
comments EEOC received and the
changes made to the interim rule are
discussed in more detail below.
Amendments to Complaints
When EEOC circulated its first draft of
the interim rule under Executive Order
12067, the regulation required that,
when posting information about the
bases and issues raised in a complaint,
agencies include bases and issues added
by amendment. Agencies commenting
on this provision argued that if bases
and issues added by amendment were to
be included among the data,
withdrawals of issues and bases
likewise should be reflected. When
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 2, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43641-43643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12410]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 2, 2006 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 43641]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. FV06-922-2 IFR]
Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Temporary
Relaxation of the Minimum Grade Requirement
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule relaxes the minimum grade requirement prescribed
under the Washington apricot marketing order for the 2006 shipping
season only. The marketing order regulates the handling of fresh
apricots grown in designated counties in the State of Washington, and
is administered locally by the Washington Apricot Marketing Committee
(Committee). This rule relaxes the minimum grade requirement for fresh
apricots from Washington No. 1 grade to Washington No. 2 grade. This
rule will enable handlers to ship more fruit into fresh market
channels, taking into consideration hail damage caused to Washington
apricots during the growing season. This change is expected to increase
returns to producers and to make more fresh apricots available to
consumers.
DATES: Effective August 3, 2006, through March 31, 2007. Comments
received by October 2, 2006 will be considered prior to issuance of a
final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the
docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for public inspection in the Office
of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Curry or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue,
Suite 385, Portland, Oregon 97204-2807; Telephone: (503) 326-2724; Fax:
(503) 326-7440.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone (202) 720-
2491; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 922 (7 CFR part 922) regulating the handling of
apricots grown in designated counties in Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule relaxes the minimum grade requirement for fresh apricots
from Washington No. 1 grade to Washington No. 2 grade. This rule will
enable handlers to ship more fruit into fresh market channels, taking
into consideration hail damage caused to Washington apricots during the
growing season. This change is expected to increase returns to
producers and to make more fresh apricots available to consumers. The
minimum grade requirement will revert to Washington No. 1 grade on
April 1, 2007, for the 2007 and future seasons.
Section 922.52 of the order authorizes the issuance of regulations
for grade, size, quality, maturity, pack, and container for any variety
of apricots grown in the production area. Section 922.53 further
authorizes the modification, suspension, or termination of regulations
issued pursuant to Sec. 922.52. Section 922.55 provides that whenever
apricots are regulated pursuant to Sec. Sec. 922.52 or 922.53, such
apricots must be inspected by the Federal-State Inspection Service, and
certified as meeting the applicable requirements of such regulations.
Minimum grade, maturity, color, and size requirements for
Washington apricots regulated under the order are specified in Sec.
922.321 Apricot Regulation 21. Section 922.321 provides, in part, that
no handler shall handle any container of apricots unless such apricots
grade not less than Washington No. 1, except for shipments subject to
exemption under the regulation. In addition, the section provides that
the Moorpark variety in open containers must be generally well matured.
That section also provides that, with the exception of exempt
shipments, apricots must be at least reasonably uniform in color, and
be not less than 1\5/8\ inches in diameter, except
[[Page 43642]]
for the Blenheim, Blenril, and Tilton varieties which must be not less
than 1\1/4\ inches in diameter. Individual shipments of apricots are
exempt from these requirements if sold for home use only, do not, in
the aggregate, exceed 500 pounds net weight, and each container is
stamped or marked with the words ``not for resale.''
This rule revises paragraph (a)(1) of Sec. 922.321 by temporarily
changing the minimum grade requirement for fresh shipments of apricots
from Washington No. 1 to Washington No. 2 for the 2006 season only. The
Washington No. 1 minimum grade requirement will resume April 1, 2007,
for the 2007 season and future seasons.
Based on a request from a handler representing several producers,
the Committee recommended by a vote of nine to one that the grade
requirement be relaxed for the 2006 season to facilitate the handling
of fruit damaged by hail. The Committee requested that this relaxation
be effective by the beginning of the 2006 Washington apricot shipping
season, which is expected to be around July 1, 2006.
The Committee meets prior to and during each season to consider
recommendations for modification, suspension, or termination of the
regulatory requirements for Washington apricots which have been issued
on a continuing basis. Committee meetings are open to the public and
interested persons may express their views at these meetings. The USDA
reviews information submitted by, and recommendations from, the
Committee and other available information to determine whether
modification, suspension, or termination of the regulatory requirements
would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
The Committee has conveyed to USDA that widely scattered hail
damage was reported within the Washington apricot production area as a
result of late spring storms. The severe weather conditions resulted in
damage to the crop making it difficult for apricots to meet the minimum
grade requirements of Washington No. 1. The Committee's original crop
estimate for the 2006 season was established at 5,000 tons. With the
full extent of hail damage unknown at this time, the Committee has not
established a revised crop estimate. However, taking into account the
reported damage, this rule provides for the handling of a larger
portion of the Washington apricot crop this season than would be
allowed if the minimum grade requirement were to remain at Washington
No. 1. Relaxation of the grade requirement for the 2006 Washington
apricot crop is intended to increase fresh shipments to meet consumer
needs and improve returns to producers.
This rule relaxes the grade requirement specified in Sec. 922.321.
This rule will not effect the color and minimum size requirements for
all varieties or the well matured requirements for the Moorpark
variety.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 300 apricot producers within the regulated
production area and approximately 22 regulated handlers. Small
agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration
(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000,
and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual
receipts are less than $6,500,000.
For the 2005 apricot shipping season, the Washington Agricultural
Statistics Service prepared a preliminary report showing that the total
5,600 ton apricot utilization sold for an average of $997 per ton.
Based on the number of producers in the production area (300), the
average annual producer revenue from the sale of apricots in 2005 can
thus be estimated at approximately $18,611.
Average revenue per handler can be estimated using f.o.b. prices.
According to USDA's Market News Service, 2005 fresh apricot f.o.b.
prices ranged from $15.00 to $20.00 per 24-pound loose-pack container,
and from $14.00 to $24.00 for 2-layer tray pack containers (which weigh
an average of about 20 pounds each). Total apricot sales revenue at the
f.o.b. shipper level can be estimated by taking the midpoints of each
of the two ranges ($17.50 and $19.00) as representative annual average
prices for each of the container types. The 2005 season fresh apricot
pack-out of 4,471 tons can be assumed to be equally divided between the
two container types, yielding an estimated quantity packed in each
container type of 2235.5 tons, or 4.471 million pounds. Dividing this
quantity by the pounds per container yields the following handler sales
revenue estimates: (a) 186,292 24-pound loose-pack containers, with an
average price of $17.50, valued at $3,260,110 and (b) 223,550 two-layer
tray pack containers, with an average price of $19.00, valued at
$4,246,500. Combining the estimated handler sales revenue for the two
container types ($7,506,610) and dividing by the number of handlers
(22) yields an annual average fresh apricot sales revenue estimate per
handler of $341,210. Since this figure is well under $750,000 (the SBA
definition of the minimum sales of a large agricultural service firm),
it is reasonable to assume that the majority of producers and handlers
of Washington apricots may be classified as small entities.
This rule revises paragraph (a)(1) of Sec. 922.321 by temporarily
changing the minimum grade requirement for fresh shipments of apricots
from Washington No. 1 to Washington No. 2 for the 2006 season only. The
Washington No. 1 minimum grade requirement will resume April 1, 2007,
for the 2007 season and future seasons. Section 922.52 of the order
authorizes the issuance of regulations for grade, size, quality,
maturity, pack, and container for any variety of apricots grown in the
production area. Section 922.53 further authorizes the modification,
suspension, or termination of regulations issued pursuant to Sec.
922.52.
The Committee anticipates that this rule will not negatively impact
small businesses. This rule relaxes the minimum grade requirement in
the order's handling regulations and should provide enhanced marketing
opportunities.
Given the emergency nature of the relaxation, the Committee's
recommendation was made via the vote-by-mail procedures of the order.
With ten of the twelve members responding, nine members supported the
temporary grade change and one member opposed it. The only alternative
to a grade relaxation offered on the ballot was to leave the minimum
grade at Washington No. 1, which was not adopted.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large apricot handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sector agencies.
[[Page 43643]]
AMS is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires Government agencies in general
to provide the public the option of submitting information or
transacting business electronically to the maximum extent possible.
In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on relaxation of the minimum grade
requirement under the Washington apricot marketing order. Any comments
received will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the Committee's recommendation, and other information, it is found that
the minimum grade requirement in Sec. 922.321 should be temporarily
relaxed from Washington No. 1 grade to Washington No. 2 grade in order
to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date
of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule relaxes the minimum grade requirement for
Washington apricots for the 2006 shipping season; (2) Washington
apricot handlers are aware of this recommendations and need no
additional time to comply with the relaxed requirements; (3) this rule
should be in effect as close as possible to July 1, 2006, the date
shipments of the 2006 Washington apricot crop are expected to begin;
and (4) this rule provides a 60-day comment period, and any comments
received will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR Part 922 is amended as
follows:
PART 922--APRICOTS GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR Part 922 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
Sec. 922.321 [Amended]
0
2. Section 922.321 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as
follows:
(a) * * *
(1) Minimum grade and maturity requirements. Such apricots that
grade not less than Washington No. 1 and are at least reasonably
uniform in color: Provided, That during the period July 1, 2006,
through March 31, 2007, the minimum grade requirement for such apricots
shall be not less than Washington No. 2; Provided further, That such
apricots of the Moorpark variety in open containers shall be generally
well matured: and
* * * * *
Dated: July 27, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E6-12410 Filed 8-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P