Safety Zone; Vermont Air National Guard 60th Anniversary Air Show, Burlington Bay, Burlington, VT, 43655-43657 [E6-12400]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 2, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This final rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Aug 01, 2006
Jkt 208001
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation.
Paragraph (32)(e) is applied to this rule
because it relates to the promulgation of
operating regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. Under figure 2–1,
paragraph (32)(e), of the instruction, an
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are not required for this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
I
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g);
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g); section
117.255 also issued under the authority of
Pub. L. 102–587, 106 Stat. 5039.
2. From July 24, 2006 through
September 30, 2006, § 117.591 is
amended by suspending paragraph (e)
and adding a temporary paragraph (g),
to read as follows:
I
§ 117.591
Charles River.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) The draw of the Department of
Conservation and Recreation, (Craigie
Bridge), mile 1.0, at Boston, shall
operate as follows:
(1) The draw shall open on signal;
except that, from 12 p.m. to 8 p.m. on
Saturday and Sunday, the draw shall
open on signal on the half-hour only,
except as stated in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43655
(2) Monday through Friday from 6
a.m. to 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. to 7 p.m., the
draw need not open for the passage of
vessel traffic, except as stated in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
Dated: July 24, 2006.
Timothy S. Sullivan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard,Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–12401 Filed 8–1–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD01–06–098]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Vermont Air National
Guard 60th Anniversary Air Show,
Burlington Bay, Burlington, VT
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
the Vermont Air National Guard 60th
Anniversary Air Show on August 18
and 19, 2006 in Burlington, Vermont.
This zone will temporarily close all
waters in Burlington Bay from Lone
Rock Point 44°29′43″ N 073°14′56″ W
SE to Oakledge Park 44°27′15″ N
073°14′52″ W, thence from the
Burlington South break wall light
44°28′12″ N 073°13′32″ W extending
due east to the shore, thence from the
Burlington north break wall 44°28′50″ N
073°13′47″ W and extending due east to
the shore. The safety zone, which
temporarily prohibits entry into or
movement within this portion of
Burlington Bay, is necessary to
safeguard the public from possible
hazards associated with an air show.
Entry into this zone by any vessel is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Northern New England or his
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 10
a.m. until 4 p.m. on August 18, 2006
and from 8 a.m. until 6 p.m. EDT on
August 19, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket [CGD01–06–
098] and are available for inspection or
copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Northern New England, 259 High Street,
South Portland, ME 04106 between 8
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
43656
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 2, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LTJG Stephanie Forbes at Sector
Northern New England, (207) 767–0313
or LTJG Jarrett Bleacher at (207) 742–
5421.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The Coast
Guard was not presented with the
logistical information for the Vermont
Air National Guard 60th Anniversary
Air Show in sufficient time to draft and
publish an NPRM. Publishing an NPRM
and delaying the effective date would be
contrary to the public interest since
immediate action is needed to protect
the maritime public from the potential
hazards associated with high-speed,
high-performance, low-flying aircraft
conducting acrobatic demonstrations
above the waters of Burlington Bay.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard also finds, for the same reasons,
that good cause exists for making this
rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Vermont National Guard is
holding a 60th Anniversary Air Show
over the waters of Burlington Bay. This
rule establishes a safety zone
temporarily closing all waters in
Burlington Bay from Lone Rock Point
44°29′43″ N 073°14′56″ W SE to
Oakledge Park 44°27′15″ N 073°14′52″
W, thence from the Burlington South
break wall light 44°28′12″ N 073°13′32″
W extending due east to the shore,
thence from the Burlington north break
wall 44°28′50″ N 073°13′47″ W and
extending due east to the shore. This
zone is necessary to protect the life and
property of the maritime public from the
potential dangers posed by this event. It
will protect the public by prohibiting
entry into or movement within the
proscribed portion of Burlington Bay
during the Vermont National Guard
60th Anniversary Air Show.
Marine traffic may transit safely
outside of the zone during the effective
period. The Captain of the Port does not
anticipate any negative impact on vessel
traffic due to this event. Public
notifications will be made prior to and
during the effective period via marine
safety information broadcasts and Local
Notice to Mariners.
Discussion of Rule
This rule is effective from 10 a.m.
until 4 p.m. on August 18, 2006 and
from 8 a.m. until 6 p.m. on August 19,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Aug 01, 2006
Jkt 208001
2006. This safety zone is needed to
safeguard mariners from the hazards
associated with low-flying, high-speed,
and high-performance acrobatic aircraft
performing above the designated waters
in Burlington Bay. During the effective
period of the safety zone, vessel traffic
will be restricted in a portion of
Burlington Bay. Entry into this zone by
any vessel is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port, Northern New England or his
designated representative.
The Captain of the Port anticipates
negligible negative impact on vessel
traffic from this temporary safety zone
as it will be in effect for limited hours
during only one weekend. Additionally,
extensive advanced notifications will be
made to the maritime community via
Local Notice to Mariners, marine
information broadcasts, local port safety
committee meetings, area newspapers,
and electronic Marine Safety
Information Bulletins. These advisories
will afford large commercial traffic
substantial advance notice to schedule
around the event. It has been
determined that the enhanced safety to
life and property provided by this rule
greatly outweighs any potential negative
impacts. Public notifications will be
made during the entire effective period
of this safety zone via Local Notice to
Mariners and marine information
broadcasts.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
The Coast Guard expects the
economic impact of this rule to be so
minimal that a full regulatory evaluation
is unnecessary. The effect of this rule
will not be significant for the following
reasons: the duration of the safety zone
is for a limited number of hours and
during the span of only one weekend.
Vessels will be permitted to transit and
navigate in waters adjacent to this safety
zone, minimizing any adverse impact.
Additionally, this rule will be entered
into the Local Notice to Mariners, and
extensive maritime advisories will be
broadcast.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners and operators of
vessels intending to transit in the
vicinity of Burlington, Vermont. The
safety zone will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities as the duration of the safety
zone is for a limited number of hours
and during the span of only one
weekend. Vessels will be permitted to
transit and navigate in waters adjacent
to this safety zone, minimizing any
adverse impact.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process. If
this rule will affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call LTJG Stephanie
Forbes at (207) 767–0313 or LTJG Jarrett
Bleacher at (207) 742–5421, Sector
Northern New England, Waterways
Management Division.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 148 / Wednesday, August 2, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Indian Tribal Governments
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Aug 01, 2006
Jkt 208001
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
PART 165–REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C 191; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g),
6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Public Law 107–
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T01–098 to
read as follows:
I
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule
fits the category selected from paragraph
(34)(g), as it establishes a safety zone. A
final ‘‘Environmental Analysis Check
List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
43657
Sfmt 4700
§ 165.T01–098 Safety Zone: Vermont Air
National Guard 60th Anniversary Air Show,
Burlington Bay, Burlington, VT.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: all waters in Burlington Bay
from Lone Rock Point 44°29′43″ N
073°14′56″ W SE to Oakledge Park
44°27′15″ N 073°14′52″ W, thence from
the Burlington South break wall light
44°28′12″ N 073°13′32″ W extending
due east to the shore, thence from the
Burlington north break wall 44°28′50″ N
073°13′47″ W and extending due east to
the shore. All vessels are restricted from
entering this area.
(b) Effective Date. This section is
effective from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on
August 18, 2006 and from 8 a.m. until
6 p.m. on August 19, 2006.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section
Designated representative means a Coast
Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or
other officer operating a Coast Guard
vessel and a Federal, State, and local
officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port (COTP).
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with the general regulations in 165.23 of
this part, entry into or movement within
this zone by any person or vessel is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP), Northern
New England or the COTP’s designated
representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP or
the COTP’s designated representative.
Dated: July 18, 2006.
Stephen P. Garrity,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard,Captain of the
Port, Northern New England.
[FR Doc. E6–12400 Filed 8–1–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
E:\FR\FM\02AUR1.SGM
02AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 2, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43655-43657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12400]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD01-06-098]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Vermont Air National Guard 60th Anniversary Air
Show, Burlington Bay, Burlington, VT
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
the Vermont Air National Guard 60th Anniversary Air Show on August 18
and 19, 2006 in Burlington, Vermont. This zone will temporarily close
all waters in Burlington Bay from Lone Rock Point 44[deg]29[min]43[sec]
N 073[deg]14[min]56[sec] W SE to Oakledge Park 44[deg]27[min]15[sec] N
073[deg]14[min]52[sec] W, thence from the Burlington South break wall
light 44[deg]28[min]12[sec] N 073[deg]13[min]32[sec] W extending due
east to the shore, thence from the Burlington north break wall
44[deg]28[min]50[sec] N 073[deg]13[min]47[sec] W and extending due east
to the shore. The safety zone, which temporarily prohibits entry into
or movement within this portion of Burlington Bay, is necessary to
safeguard the public from possible hazards associated with an air show.
Entry into this zone by any vessel is prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Northern New England or his
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on August 18,
2006 and from 8 a.m. until 6 p.m. EDT on August 19, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket [CGD01-06-098] and are available for
inspection or copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector Northern New England,
259 High Street, South Portland, ME 04106 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
[[Page 43656]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTJG Stephanie Forbes at Sector
Northern New England, (207) 767-0313 or LTJG Jarrett Bleacher at (207)
742-5421.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The Coast Guard was not
presented with the logistical information for the Vermont Air National
Guard 60th Anniversary Air Show in sufficient time to draft and publish
an NPRM. Publishing an NPRM and delaying the effective date would be
contrary to the public interest since immediate action is needed to
protect the maritime public from the potential hazards associated with
high-speed, high-performance, low-flying aircraft conducting acrobatic
demonstrations above the waters of Burlington Bay.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard also finds, for the same
reasons, that good cause exists for making this rule effective less
than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Vermont National Guard is holding a 60th Anniversary Air Show
over the waters of Burlington Bay. This rule establishes a safety zone
temporarily closing all waters in Burlington Bay from Lone Rock Point
44[deg]29[min]43[sec] N 073[deg]14[min]56[sec] W SE to Oakledge Park
44[deg]27[min]15[sec] N 073[deg]14[min]52[sec] W, thence from the
Burlington South break wall light 44[deg]28[min]12[sec] N
073[deg]13[min]32[sec] W extending due east to the shore, thence from
the Burlington north break wall 44[deg]28[min]50[sec] N
073[deg]13[min]47[sec] W and extending due east to the shore. This zone
is necessary to protect the life and property of the maritime public
from the potential dangers posed by this event. It will protect the
public by prohibiting entry into or movement within the proscribed
portion of Burlington Bay during the Vermont National Guard 60th
Anniversary Air Show.
Marine traffic may transit safely outside of the zone during the
effective period. The Captain of the Port does not anticipate any
negative impact on vessel traffic due to this event. Public
notifications will be made prior to and during the effective period via
marine safety information broadcasts and Local Notice to Mariners.
Discussion of Rule
This rule is effective from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on August 18, 2006
and from 8 a.m. until 6 p.m. on August 19, 2006. This safety zone is
needed to safeguard mariners from the hazards associated with low-
flying, high-speed, and high-performance acrobatic aircraft performing
above the designated waters in Burlington Bay. During the effective
period of the safety zone, vessel traffic will be restricted in a
portion of Burlington Bay. Entry into this zone by any vessel is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Northern New England or his designated representative.
The Captain of the Port anticipates negligible negative impact on
vessel traffic from this temporary safety zone as it will be in effect
for limited hours during only one weekend. Additionally, extensive
advanced notifications will be made to the maritime community via Local
Notice to Mariners, marine information broadcasts, local port safety
committee meetings, area newspapers, and electronic Marine Safety
Information Bulletins. These advisories will afford large commercial
traffic substantial advance notice to schedule around the event. It has
been determined that the enhanced safety to life and property provided
by this rule greatly outweighs any potential negative impacts. Public
notifications will be made during the entire effective period of this
safety zone via Local Notice to Mariners and marine information
broadcasts.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this rule to be so
minimal that a full regulatory evaluation is unnecessary. The effect of
this rule will not be significant for the following reasons: the
duration of the safety zone is for a limited number of hours and during
the span of only one weekend. Vessels will be permitted to transit and
navigate in waters adjacent to this safety zone, minimizing any adverse
impact. Additionally, this rule will be entered into the Local Notice
to Mariners, and extensive maritime advisories will be broadcast.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners and operators of vessels intending to
transit in the vicinity of Burlington, Vermont. The safety zone will
not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities
as the duration of the safety zone is for a limited number of hours and
during the span of only one weekend. Vessels will be permitted to
transit and navigate in waters adjacent to this safety zone, minimizing
any adverse impact.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If this
rule will affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call LTJG Stephanie Forbes at (207) 767-
0313 or LTJG Jarrett Bleacher at (207) 742-5421, Sector Northern New
England, Waterways Management Division.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and
[[Page 43657]]
would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. This rule fits the category selected from paragraph
(34)(g), as it establishes a safety zone. A final ``Environmental
Analysis Check List'' and a final ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' will be available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165-REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C
191; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T01-098 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-098 Safety Zone: Vermont Air National Guard 60th
Anniversary Air Show, Burlington Bay, Burlington, VT.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all waters in
Burlington Bay from Lone Rock Point 44[deg]29'43'' N 073[deg]14'56'' W
SE to Oakledge Park 44[deg]27'15'' N 073[deg]14'52'' W, thence from the
Burlington South break wall light 44[deg]28'12'' N 073[deg]13'32'' W
extending due east to the shore, thence from the Burlington north break
wall 44[deg]28'50'' N 073[deg]13'47'' W and extending due east to the
shore. All vessels are restricted from entering this area.
(b) Effective Date. This section is effective from 10 a.m. until 4
p.m. on August 18, 2006 and from 8 a.m. until 6 p.m. on August 19,
2006.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section Designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port (COTP).
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
165.23 of this part, entry into or movement within this zone by any
person or vessel is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP), Northern New England or the COTP's designated
representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or the COTP's designated representative to
obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter
or operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
Dated: July 18, 2006.
Stephen P. Garrity,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard,Captain of the Port, Northern New England.
[FR Doc. E6-12400 Filed 8-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P