Small Business Timber Sale Set-Aside Program Share Recomputation, 43435-43438 [E6-12310]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 147 / Tuesday, August 1, 2006 / Notices
Options range from recalls to export
information to regulations, directives
and notices. Customers can add or
delete subscriptions themselves and
have the option to password protect
their account.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Done at Washington, DC, on: July 27, 2006.
F. Edward Scarbrough,
U.S. Manager for Codex Alimentarius.
[FR Doc. E6–12337 Filed 7–31–06; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
Forest Service
Notice of Southwest Idaho Resource
Advisory Committee Meeting
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Tehama County Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: The Tehama County Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in
Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to
be covered include: (1) Introductions,
(2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public
Comment, (4) Presentation of Project
Proposals/Voting on Proposals, (5) (6)
Chairman’s Perspective, (7) General
Discussion, (8) Next Agenda.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
August 10, 2006 from 9 a.m. and end at
approximately 12 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Lincoln Street School, Conference
Room A, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff,
CA. Individuals wishing to speak or
propose agenda items must send their
names and proposals to Tricia
Christofferson, Acting DFO, 825 N.
Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bobbin Gaddini, Committee
Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino
National Forest, Grindstone Ranger
District, P.O. Box 164, Elk Creek, CA
95939. (530) 968–5329; e-mail
ggaddini@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public.
Committee discussion is limited to
Forest Service staff and Committee
members. However, persons who wish
to bring matters to the attention of the
Committee may file written statements
with the Committee staff before or after
the meeting. Public input sessions will
be provided and individuals who made
written request by August 8, 2006 will
have the opportunity to address the
committee at those sessions.
Dated: July 25, 2006.
Tricia Christofferson,
Acting Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 06–6598 Filed 7–31–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:04 Jul 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
ACTION:
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–
393), the Boise and Payette National
Forests’ Southwest Idaho Resource
Advisory Committee will conduct a
business meeting, which is open to the
public.
DATES: Wednesday, August 16, 2006,
beginning at 10:30 a.m.
ADDRESSES: Valley County Courthouse,
219 North Main Street, Cascade, Idaho.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda
will include review and approval of
project proposals, and is an open public
forum.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Gochnour, Designated Federal
Officer, at 208–392–6681 or e-mail
dgochnour@fs.fed.us.
Dated: July 26, 2006.
Lana S. Thurston,
Administrative Officer, Boise National Forest.
[FR Doc. 06–6601 Filed 7–31–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
[RIN 0596–AC46]
Small Business Timber Sale Set-Aside
Program Share Recomputation
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of proposed policy
directive; request for public comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service proposes
to remove structural change
recomputation direction contained in
Forest Service Timber Sale Preparation
Handbook (FSH) 2409.18 (applicable in
Forest Service Regions 1 through 6 only)
as one of the means of recomputing
timber sale set-aside market share
allocation to small business mills within
a market area. This change is needed to
make the recomputation process as
accurate as possible by making market
shares more reflective of current market
conditions, in terms of volume and
business capacity, as well as to simplify
the process by which market share is
determined. The direction on scheduled
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43435
recomputation of market shares and
special recomputations would be
retained. Additionally, the Forest
Service is proposing to include volumes
sold or disposed of via stewardship
contracting (Integrated Resource
Contract, 2400–13 & 13T) in the
volumes used to calculate market shares
pursuant to the small business timber
sale set-aside program.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by October 2, 2006.
ADDRESSES: The full text of FSH
2409.18, chapter 90 is available
electronically on the World Wide Web/
Internet at https://www.fs.fed.us/im/
directives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Fitzgerald, Assistant Director,
Forest Management Staff, by telephone
at (202) 205–1753 or by Internet at
rfitzgerald@fs.fed.us.
Developed
in cooperation with the Small Business
Administration, the Forest Service
Small Business Timber Sale Set-aside
Program is designed to ensure that
qualifying small business timber
purchasers have the opportunity to
purchase a fair proportion of National
Forest System timber offered for sale.
The current Small Business Timber Sale
Set-aside Program was adopted July 26,
1990 (55 FR 30485). Direction that
guides Forest Service employees in
administering the Small Business
Timber Sale Set-aside Program is issued
in the Forest Service Manual (FSM),
Chapter 2430, and in Chapter 90 of the
Forest Service Timber Sale Preparation
Handbook (FSH 2409.18).
According to the guidelines of the setaside program, the Forest Service
recomputes the shares of timber sales to
be set aside for bidding by qualifying
small businesses every 5 years. The
share percentage is based on the actual
volume of sawtimber that has been
purchased and/or harvested by small
businesses during a 5-year period. In
addition to the 5-year scheduled
recomputation requirement, in Forest
Service Regions 1 through 6, small
business shares currently must be
recomputed whenever a structural
change occurs (see FSH 2409.18,
chapter 90, section 91.22).
Structural change (applicable to
Regions 1 through 6 only) is defined at
FSH 2409.18, chapter 90, section 90.5,
paragraph 8b as a change that ‘‘may
occur during a recomputation period
when a small or large business firm that
purchased at least 10 percent of the total
sawlog volume during the last
recomputation period discontinues
operations or changes its size status
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
43436
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 147 / Tuesday, August 1, 2006 / Notices
through the sale or purchase of
manufacturing capacity. When a
structural change occurs, the small
business share must be recomputed in
accordance with the procedure set out
in section 91.22b.’’
In the past, the adjustment of market
shares, based on scheduled
recomputations and structural change
recomputation where warranted,
functioned acceptably, when the timber
sale program operated at its historic
levels of annual sell volume. However,
in the past 15 years, annual volume of
timber sold in all Forest Service regions
has declined substantially. For example,
the annual volume of Forest Service
timber offered for sale has decreased
from 12 billion board feet in fiscal year
1990 to around 2 billion board feet in
fiscal year 2004.
Presently, nearly half of the National
Forest timber volume sold has been
salvaged from areas damaged by fire and
other catastrophic events. The current
annual timber sale program is
characterized by this increase in salvage
timber, a much reduced number of
advertisements of timber for sale, a
relatively sporadic release of the
available timber sales for bidding, and
the overall substantial decline in saw
timber volume for sale.
Structural change recomputations,
which occur at unpredictable times,
may be (and have been) followed by
years of minimal or no timber volume
offered for sale by the Forest Service
that is suitable for purchase by qualified
small businesses in a market area. This
results in a significantly distorted
database in a 3-year period on which to
base a structural change share
recomputation. The problem is
compounded by existing set-aside
guidelines which place no limit on the
amount of share change that may occur
as a result of a structural change
recomputation. Establishment of a new
small business share through a
structural change recomputation can
lock in a share change based on
distorted data for an inordinate period
of time.
The procedure for recomputation of
shares following a structural change is
designed to provide small business
firms the opportunity to maintain their
historical share when a firm changes
size, but provides for a reasonably rapid
adjustment of shares to reflect the actual
purchase and harvest patterns which
develop (FSH 2409.18, chapter 90,
section 91.22b). With changes in the
timber sale program and the amount and
type of timber offered for sale, structural
change recomputations no longer appear
to adequately accomplish these goals.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:04 Jul 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
Thus, the Forest Service proposes to
drop the structural change
recomputation from the direction in
FSH 2409.18. Any structural changes
which were previously announced and
are underway would be dropped. When
a 5-year recomputation was skipped
because of the structural change, the 5year recomputation would be completed
and the results made retroactive to the
normal 5-year recomputation schedule.
Special recomputations of market
share, as defined at FSH 2409.18,
chapter 90, section 91.23, would remain
in effect to deal with unique and
unforeseen circumstances which may
require departure from established
procedure.
The directive text being proposed for
removal (FSH 2409.18, chapter 90)
includes section 90.5, paragraph 8b
(definition for structural change) and
section 90.41, paragraphs 4 and 9
(Forest Supervisor responsibilities), as
well as references to structural changes
in sections 91.17, 91.22, 91.22a, 91.22b,
and 91.3.
The directive text being proposed for
removal may be found on the World
Wide Web/Internet at https://
www.fs.fed.us/cgi-bin/Directives/
get_dirs/fsh?2409.18/ in the file named
2409.18_90.doc.
Section 347 of the Department of the
Interior and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained
in section 101(e) of division A of Public
Law 105–277), as amended by section
323 of the Department of the Interior
and Related Agencies Appropriations
Act, 2003 (as contained in division F of
Public Law 108–7; 16 U.S.C. note),
authorizes the Forest Service (FS) and
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM),
until September 30, 2013, to enter into
stewardship contracting projects
(stewardship projects) with private
persons or public or private entities, by
contract or by agreement, to perform
services to achieve land management
goals for the national forests or public
lands that meet local and rural
community needs.
The land management goals for
stewardship projects may include
treatments to improve, maintain, or
restore forest or rangeland health;
restore or maintain water quality;
improve fish and wildlife habitat; and
reduce hazardous fuels that pose risks to
communities and ecosystem values,
reestablish native plant species, or other
land management objectives.
Stewardship projects are not a
replacement for agencies’ existing
timber sale programs. Stewardship
contracting may differ from other
contracting authorities in the following
manner:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
—A source for performance of contracts
shall be selected on a best value basis;
—Contract length may exceed 5 years
but may not exceed 10 years;
—The agencies may apply the value of
timber or other forest products
removed as an offset against the costs
of any services received;
—The agencies may collect monies from
a stewardship contract so long as the
collection is a secondary objective of
negotiating contracts that best achieve
the purposes of section 347, as
amended by section 323;
—Monies received from the sale of
timber, forest products, or vegetation
via a stewardship contract may be
retained by the agencies and available
for expenditure at the project site or
at another stewardship project site
without further appropriation;
—A multiparty monitoring and
evaluation process is required.
The Forest Service has issued
guidance in Forest Service Handbook
2409.19, chapter 60. Stewardship
projects are authorized on all Forest
Service units. Forest Supervisors select
the projects for their respective units
and Regional Foresters provide
oversight of the program.
The Forest Service has sold some
sawlog volume from stewardship
projects on National Forest System
lands under its integrated resource
contracts (IRC). Sawlog volume from the
IRC was tracked, but not included in the
volumes used to calculate the small
business timber sale set-aside program
for the recomputation period ending in
2005. Some sawlogs disposed of via
stewardship contracts have been
purchased by small and large timber
industry businesses.
The Forest Service has four IRCs. Two
are designed for use when the value of
the timber to be disposed of in the
project exceeds the value of the services
received in the project (2400–13 & 13T).
These two contracts are generally
referred to as integrated resource timber
contracts (IRTC). The other two
contracts used for stewardship are used
when the value of the services received
exceeds the value of the timber to be
disposed, and are generally referred to
as integrated resource service contracts
(IRSC). These contracts are primarily
considered procurement contracts and
include contract provisions required by
the Federal Acquisition Regulations and
other procurement related laws and
regulations. However, the IRSC also
contains some provisions necessary to
govern the disposal of the timber.
The amount of timber volume offered
under traditional timber sale contracts
has declined significantly over the past
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 147 / Tuesday, August 1, 2006 / Notices
decade. Consequently, the sawlog
volumes used to calculate market shares
also have declined. In light of these
significant declines and the need to
adequately and fully consider sawlog
volumes disposed of via contracts with
the timber industry, the Forest Service
proposes to include sawlog volumes
from IRTC (2400–13 & 13T) in the
volumes used to calculate market shares
pursuant to the small business timber
sale set-aside program. Since new
market shares recently have been
recomputed and announced for the 5year period ending in 2010, the Forest
Service proposes to include volumes
sold via the IRTC in the operation of the
regular set-aside program for the 2005–
2010 period. The volumes will be
tracked and used to establish new
market shares at the end of the 2010
period, as well as for special
recomputations that may occur prior to
scheduled recomputations.
The Forest Service is proposing to
include only the IRTCs in the set-aside
program as these are the contracts that
have significant timber volumes and the
logs generally are of sufficient size to
produce sawlogs, the primary focus of
the set-aside program. The Forest
Service does not propose to include the
IRTCs as they generally have lesser
quantities of timber volume and they are
governed by the Federal Acquisition
Regulation and other procurement
related statutes and regulations, as well
as the laws and regulations governing
set asides for small businesses seeking
procurement contracts. The Department
of Agriculture already has requirements
for small business consideration for
service contracts; therefore, there is no
need to include the IRSCs in the small
business timber sale set-aside program.
New market shares recently have been
recomputed and announced for the next
5-year period ending in 2010. The
Forest Service believes it now is
appropriate to include stewardship
contract sawlog volumes from 2400–13
and 13T contracts in the
implementation of the small business
timber sale set-aside program for 2005–
2010, and including the results of these
sales along with the regular timber sale
program results when recomputing
market shares for the period ending
2015.
The 70/30 rule for traditional timber
sale contracts requires that at least 70
percent of the sawlog volume sold via
a timber sale contract be processed by
a small business manufacturer (FSH
2409.18, chapter 90). Because of unique
aspects of stewardship contracting (such
as offsetting the costs of services
received by the value of timber or forest
products contained in a stewardship
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:04 Jul 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
contract; and the nature of stewardship
contracting which makes collection of
money from a stewardship contract a
secondary objective), it would not be
appropriate to include the 70/30
requirement in the small business
timber sale set-aside program.
Thus, the Forest Service proposes to
amend the direction in FSH 2409.18,
chapter 90 (the direction for the timber
sale set-aside program) and the direction
in FSH 2409.19, chapter 60—
Stewardship Contracting, to include the
sawlog volumes from projects sold as
integrated resource contracts 2400–13
and 13T in the small business timber
sale set-aside program. Further, disposal
of the logs from IRCs would not be
subject to the 70/30 processing
requirement.
Regulatory Certifications
Regulatory Impact
This proposed directive change has
been reviewed under USDA procedures
and Executive Order 12866 on
Regulatory Planning and Review. It has
been determined that this is not a
significant policy. This proposed change
will not have an annual effect of $100
million or more on the economy nor
adversely affect productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, nor State or local
governments. This proposed policy will
not interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency nor raise
new legal or policy issues. Finally, this
action will not alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients of such
programs. Accordingly, this policy is
not subject to OMB review under
Executive Order 12866.
Moreover, this proposed directive
change has been considered in light of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.), and it has been determined
that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
defined by that Act.
Environmental Impact
Section 31.1b of Forest Service
Handbook 1909.15 (57 FR 43180;
September 18, 1992) excludes from
documentation in an environmental
assessment or impact statement ‘‘rules,
regulations, or policies to establish
service-wide administrative procedures,
program processes, or instructions.’’ The
agency’s assessment is that this
proposed directive change falls within
this category of actions and that no
extraordinary circumstances exist which
would require preparation of an
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43437
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement.
Unfunded Mandates Reform
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531–1538), which the President signed
into law on March 22, 1995, the
Department has assessed the effects of
this proposed policy on State, local, and
tribal governments and the private
sector. This proposed directive change
does not compel the expenditure of
$100 million or more by any State, local,
or tribal governments, or anyone in the
private sector. Therefore, a statement
under section 202 of the Act is not
required.
Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the
Public
This proposed directive change does
not contain any recordkeeping or
reporting requirements or other
information collection requirements as
defined in 5 CFR 1320 and, therefore,
imposes no paperwork burden on the
public. Accordingly, the review
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and
implementing regulations at 5 CFR part
1320 do not apply.
No Takings Implications
This proposed directive change has
been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights, and it has been determined that
it would not pose the risk of a taking of
private property as they are limited to
the revision of administrative
procedures.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed directive change has
been reviewed under Executive Order
12988, Civil Justice Reform. This
proposed change will direct the work of
Forest Service employees and is not
intended to preempt any State and local
laws and regulations that might be in
conflict or that would impede full
implementation of this directive. The
change would not retroactively affect
existing permits, contracts, or other
instruments authorizing the occupancy
and use of National Forest System lands
and would not require the institution of
administrative proceedings before
parties may file suit in court challenging
its provisions.
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
43438
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 147 / Tuesday, August 1, 2006 / Notices
Dated: June 21, 2006.
Dale N. Bosworth,
Chief.
[FR Doc. E6–12310 Filed 7–31–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
Environmental Statements, Availability
Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has
prepared a Draft Areawide
Environmental Impact Statement
consistent with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended, to disclose potential effects to
the human environment.
The Watershed Plan and Areawide
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the Cape Cod Water Resources
Restoration Project are combined into a
single document. The purposes of the
Project are to restore degraded salt
marshes, restore anadromous fish
passages, and improve water quality for
shellfishing areas. Specifically, sponsors
wish to:
1. Improve tidal flushing in salt
marshes where man-made obstructions
(i.e., road culverts) have restricted tidal
flow. This will help restore native plant
and animal communities in salt
marshes, and improve biotic integrity.
2. Restore fish ladders and other fish
passages that have deteriorated. This
will allow greater numbers of
anadromous fish (which spend most of
their adult lives in salt water and
migrate to freshwater streams, rivers,
and lakes to reproduce; for example,
alewife, blueback herring) to gain access
to spawning areas, and support greater
populations of other species (for
example, striped bass, bluefish,
weakfish, largemouth bass, chain
pickerel) that depend on them for food.
3. Maintain and improve water
quality affecting shellfish beds by
treating stormwater runoff. This will
help ensure that shellfish beds which
are threatened with closure remain
open, and maintain or extend the
current shellfishing season for beds
whose use is restricted during certain
times of year.
This Project is needed because human
activity on Cape Cod has degraded its
natural resources, including salt
marshes, anadromous fish runs, and
water quality over shellfish beds. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:04 Jul 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
development of Cape Cod has required
the construction of extensive road and
railroad networks. Along the coast,
culverts or bridges were needed for
these networks to cross tidal marshes,
and many of the openings through these
structures are not large enough to allow
adequate tidal flushing. When the
culverts or bridges constrict flow, the
tidal regime changes, which results in
vegetation changes over time; what was
once a thriving salt marsh can become
a brackish or fresh water wetland
dominated by invasive species. Together
with funding from the Massachusetts
Office of Coastal Zone Management
(CZM), the Cape Cod Commission and
the Buzzards Bay Project National
Estuary Program identified over 182
sites where salt marshes have been
altered by human activity.
Human activity on Cape Cod has also
resulted in damming or diverting
streams, causing anadromous fish to
lose access to spawning grounds. In
addition, water flow may have been
altered by cranberry growers and other
farmers. Fish ladders and other fish
passage facilities have been built to help
ensure that fish get access to spawning
areas, but these structures deteriorate
over time (end of design life), or they
may be of obsolete design and need
replacement to function properly. The
Massachusetts Division of Marine
Fisheries (DMF) identified 93 fish
passage obstructions on Cape Cod.
Cape Cod’s economy depends on good
water quality. Shellfishing, a multimillion dollar industry on the Cape, is
only allowed in areas with excellent
water quality. As land is developed, and
more areas are paved, stormwater runoff
may become contaminated with
nutrients, metals, fertilizers, bacteria,
etc. This runoff may carry enough fecal
coliform bacteria to affect water quality
in shellfishing areas, thus leading to
closure of shellfishing areas, or
restrictions on the periods when the
beds can remain open. DMF and town
officials identified over 160 stormwater
discharge points into shellfishing areas.
By controlling sources of runoff,
separating clean water from
contamination sources, and capturing
and treating the most heavily
contaminated runoff through a variety of
measures (e.g., infiltration, constructed
wetlands).
Two alternatives were considered:
Proposed Action/Recommended Plan
and the No action alternative.
No Action would continue the
declining trend of water quality of
shellfish waters, impaired anadromous
fish runs and degraded salt marshes.
The recommended plan is the
Proposed Action (Cape Cod Water
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Resources Restoration Project) because
it maximizes ecological benefits and is
the National Ecosystem Restoration
(NER) Plan. The Recommended Plan
achieves the desired level of
improvement for the least cost. For each
project type (shellfish, fish passage, and
salt marsh), the Restoration Project
would provide a greater number of
habitat units and greater other
environmental benefits than the No
Action Alternative. NRCS has
developed a list of 76 projects that will
meet the sponsors’ objectives. All of
these projects have received a planninglevel analysis to ensure that they appear
feasible and capable of providing the
habitat benefits sought through this
areawide Project. When the Project is
authorized and funded, the sponsors
will propose specific projects to NRCS.
NRCS will review each project in more
detail to determine the most costeffective practice for that site and to
verify that the habitat objectives will be
achieved.
The recommended plan would help to
maintain or improve water quality in up
to 26 shellfish areas affecting 7,300
acres of shellfish beds. Current laws and
regulations require stormwater
management for all new developments,
which prevents or minimizes new
development from causing the same
water quality impairments that occurred
in the past. The Project is expected to
improve tidal flushing at 26 sites
enhancing 1,500 acres of salt marsh.
Current design guidelines prevent or
minimize road or railroad construction
from causing the same hydrological
restrictions that occurred in the past.
And through this Project it is expected
that 24 fish passages on Cape Cod
would be restored to full function
improving access to 4,200 acres of
spawning habitat.
Written comments regarding this Draft
Areawide EIS should be mailed to: Cecil
B. Currin, Cape Cod Water Resources
Restoration Project EIS, USDA–NRCS,
451 West Street, Amherst, MA 01002.
Comments may also be submitted by
sending a facsimile to (413) 253–4395 or
by e-mail to cecil.currin@ma.usda.gov.
Please include CCWRRP in the subject
line.
Project information is also available
on the Internet at https://
www.ma.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/
CCWRRP.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than 45 days after this notice is
published.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cecil B. Currin, State Conservationist,
USDA Natural Resources Conservation
Service, 451 West Street, Amherst, MA
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 147 (Tuesday, August 1, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43435-43438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12310]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
[RIN 0596-AC46]
Small Business Timber Sale Set-Aside Program Share Recomputation
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of proposed policy directive; request for public
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service proposes to remove structural change
recomputation direction contained in Forest Service Timber Sale
Preparation Handbook (FSH) 2409.18 (applicable in Forest Service
Regions 1 through 6 only) as one of the means of recomputing timber
sale set-aside market share allocation to small business mills within a
market area. This change is needed to make the recomputation process as
accurate as possible by making market shares more reflective of current
market conditions, in terms of volume and business capacity, as well as
to simplify the process by which market share is determined. The
direction on scheduled recomputation of market shares and special
recomputations would be retained. Additionally, the Forest Service is
proposing to include volumes sold or disposed of via stewardship
contracting (Integrated Resource Contract, 2400-13 & 13T) in the
volumes used to calculate market shares pursuant to the small business
timber sale set-aside program.
DATES: Comments must be received in writing by October 2, 2006.
ADDRESSES: The full text of FSH 2409.18, chapter 90 is available
electronically on the World Wide Web/Internet at https://www.fs.fed.us/
im/directives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Fitzgerald, Assistant
Director, Forest Management Staff, by telephone at (202) 205-1753 or by
Internet at rfitzgerald@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Developed in cooperation with the Small
Business Administration, the Forest Service Small Business Timber Sale
Set-aside Program is designed to ensure that qualifying small business
timber purchasers have the opportunity to purchase a fair proportion of
National Forest System timber offered for sale. The current Small
Business Timber Sale Set-aside Program was adopted July 26, 1990 (55 FR
30485). Direction that guides Forest Service employees in administering
the Small Business Timber Sale Set-aside Program is issued in the
Forest Service Manual (FSM), Chapter 2430, and in Chapter 90 of the
Forest Service Timber Sale Preparation Handbook (FSH 2409.18).
According to the guidelines of the set-aside program, the Forest
Service recomputes the shares of timber sales to be set aside for
bidding by qualifying small businesses every 5 years. The share
percentage is based on the actual volume of sawtimber that has been
purchased and/or harvested by small businesses during a 5-year period.
In addition to the 5-year scheduled recomputation requirement, in
Forest Service Regions 1 through 6, small business shares currently
must be recomputed whenever a structural change occurs (see FSH
2409.18, chapter 90, section 91.22).
Structural change (applicable to Regions 1 through 6 only) is
defined at FSH 2409.18, chapter 90, section 90.5, paragraph 8b as a
change that ``may occur during a recomputation period when a small or
large business firm that purchased at least 10 percent of the total
sawlog volume during the last recomputation period discontinues
operations or changes its size status
[[Page 43436]]
through the sale or purchase of manufacturing capacity. When a
structural change occurs, the small business share must be recomputed
in accordance with the procedure set out in section 91.22b.''
In the past, the adjustment of market shares, based on scheduled
recomputations and structural change recomputation where warranted,
functioned acceptably, when the timber sale program operated at its
historic levels of annual sell volume. However, in the past 15 years,
annual volume of timber sold in all Forest Service regions has declined
substantially. For example, the annual volume of Forest Service timber
offered for sale has decreased from 12 billion board feet in fiscal
year 1990 to around 2 billion board feet in fiscal year 2004.
Presently, nearly half of the National Forest timber volume sold
has been salvaged from areas damaged by fire and other catastrophic
events. The current annual timber sale program is characterized by this
increase in salvage timber, a much reduced number of advertisements of
timber for sale, a relatively sporadic release of the available timber
sales for bidding, and the overall substantial decline in saw timber
volume for sale.
Structural change recomputations, which occur at unpredictable
times, may be (and have been) followed by years of minimal or no timber
volume offered for sale by the Forest Service that is suitable for
purchase by qualified small businesses in a market area. This results
in a significantly distorted database in a 3-year period on which to
base a structural change share recomputation. The problem is compounded
by existing set-aside guidelines which place no limit on the amount of
share change that may occur as a result of a structural change
recomputation. Establishment of a new small business share through a
structural change recomputation can lock in a share change based on
distorted data for an inordinate period of time.
The procedure for recomputation of shares following a structural
change is designed to provide small business firms the opportunity to
maintain their historical share when a firm changes size, but provides
for a reasonably rapid adjustment of shares to reflect the actual
purchase and harvest patterns which develop (FSH 2409.18, chapter 90,
section 91.22b). With changes in the timber sale program and the amount
and type of timber offered for sale, structural change recomputations
no longer appear to adequately accomplish these goals.
Thus, the Forest Service proposes to drop the structural change
recomputation from the direction in FSH 2409.18. Any structural changes
which were previously announced and are underway would be dropped. When
a 5-year recomputation was skipped because of the structural change,
the 5-year recomputation would be completed and the results made
retroactive to the normal 5-year recomputation schedule.
Special recomputations of market share, as defined at FSH 2409.18,
chapter 90, section 91.23, would remain in effect to deal with unique
and unforeseen circumstances which may require departure from
established procedure.
The directive text being proposed for removal (FSH 2409.18, chapter
90) includes section 90.5, paragraph 8b (definition for structural
change) and section 90.41, paragraphs 4 and 9 (Forest Supervisor
responsibilities), as well as references to structural changes in
sections 91.17, 91.22, 91.22a, 91.22b, and 91.3.
The directive text being proposed for removal may be found on the
World Wide Web/Internet at https://www.fs.fed.us/cgi-bin/Directives/
get_dirs/fsh?2409.18/ in the file named 2409.18--90.doc.
Section 347 of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in section 101(e) of division A
of Public Law 105-277), as amended by section 323 of the Department of
the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2003 (as
contained in division F of Public Law 108-7; 16 U.S.C. note),
authorizes the Forest Service (FS) and the Bureau of Land Management
(BLM), until September 30, 2013, to enter into stewardship contracting
projects (stewardship projects) with private persons or public or
private entities, by contract or by agreement, to perform services to
achieve land management goals for the national forests or public lands
that meet local and rural community needs.
The land management goals for stewardship projects may include
treatments to improve, maintain, or restore forest or rangeland health;
restore or maintain water quality; improve fish and wildlife habitat;
and reduce hazardous fuels that pose risks to communities and ecosystem
values, reestablish native plant species, or other land management
objectives. Stewardship projects are not a replacement for agencies'
existing timber sale programs. Stewardship contracting may differ from
other contracting authorities in the following manner:
--A source for performance of contracts shall be selected on a best
value basis;
--Contract length may exceed 5 years but may not exceed 10 years;
--The agencies may apply the value of timber or other forest products
removed as an offset against the costs of any services received;
--The agencies may collect monies from a stewardship contract so long
as the collection is a secondary objective of negotiating contracts
that best achieve the purposes of section 347, as amended by section
323;
--Monies received from the sale of timber, forest products, or
vegetation via a stewardship contract may be retained by the agencies
and available for expenditure at the project site or at another
stewardship project site without further appropriation;
--A multiparty monitoring and evaluation process is required.
The Forest Service has issued guidance in Forest Service Handbook
2409.19, chapter 60. Stewardship projects are authorized on all Forest
Service units. Forest Supervisors select the projects for their
respective units and Regional Foresters provide oversight of the
program.
The Forest Service has sold some sawlog volume from stewardship
projects on National Forest System lands under its integrated resource
contracts (IRC). Sawlog volume from the IRC was tracked, but not
included in the volumes used to calculate the small business timber
sale set-aside program for the recomputation period ending in 2005.
Some sawlogs disposed of via stewardship contracts have been purchased
by small and large timber industry businesses.
The Forest Service has four IRCs. Two are designed for use when the
value of the timber to be disposed of in the project exceeds the value
of the services received in the project (2400-13 & 13T). These two
contracts are generally referred to as integrated resource timber
contracts (IRTC). The other two contracts used for stewardship are used
when the value of the services received exceeds the value of the timber
to be disposed, and are generally referred to as integrated resource
service contracts (IRSC). These contracts are primarily considered
procurement contracts and include contract provisions required by the
Federal Acquisition Regulations and other procurement related laws and
regulations. However, the IRSC also contains some provisions necessary
to govern the disposal of the timber.
The amount of timber volume offered under traditional timber sale
contracts has declined significantly over the past
[[Page 43437]]
decade. Consequently, the sawlog volumes used to calculate market
shares also have declined. In light of these significant declines and
the need to adequately and fully consider sawlog volumes disposed of
via contracts with the timber industry, the Forest Service proposes to
include sawlog volumes from IRTC (2400-13 & 13T) in the volumes used to
calculate market shares pursuant to the small business timber sale set-
aside program. Since new market shares recently have been recomputed
and announced for the 5-year period ending in 2010, the Forest Service
proposes to include volumes sold via the IRTC in the operation of the
regular set-aside program for the 2005-2010 period. The volumes will be
tracked and used to establish new market shares at the end of the 2010
period, as well as for special recomputations that may occur prior to
scheduled recomputations.
The Forest Service is proposing to include only the IRTCs in the
set-aside program as these are the contracts that have significant
timber volumes and the logs generally are of sufficient size to produce
sawlogs, the primary focus of the set-aside program. The Forest Service
does not propose to include the IRTCs as they generally have lesser
quantities of timber volume and they are governed by the Federal
Acquisition Regulation and other procurement related statutes and
regulations, as well as the laws and regulations governing set asides
for small businesses seeking procurement contracts. The Department of
Agriculture already has requirements for small business consideration
for service contracts; therefore, there is no need to include the IRSCs
in the small business timber sale set-aside program.
New market shares recently have been recomputed and announced for
the next 5-year period ending in 2010. The Forest Service believes it
now is appropriate to include stewardship contract sawlog volumes from
2400-13 and 13T contracts in the implementation of the small business
timber sale set-aside program for 2005-2010, and including the results
of these sales along with the regular timber sale program results when
recomputing market shares for the period ending 2015.
The 70/30 rule for traditional timber sale contracts requires that
at least 70 percent of the sawlog volume sold via a timber sale
contract be processed by a small business manufacturer (FSH 2409.18,
chapter 90). Because of unique aspects of stewardship contracting (such
as offsetting the costs of services received by the value of timber or
forest products contained in a stewardship contract; and the nature of
stewardship contracting which makes collection of money from a
stewardship contract a secondary objective), it would not be
appropriate to include the 70/30 requirement in the small business
timber sale set-aside program.
Thus, the Forest Service proposes to amend the direction in FSH
2409.18, chapter 90 (the direction for the timber sale set-aside
program) and the direction in FSH 2409.19, chapter 60--Stewardship
Contracting, to include the sawlog volumes from projects sold as
integrated resource contracts 2400-13 and 13T in the small business
timber sale set-aside program. Further, disposal of the logs from IRCs
would not be subject to the 70/30 processing requirement.
Regulatory Certifications
Regulatory Impact
This proposed directive change has been reviewed under USDA
procedures and Executive Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning and Review.
It has been determined that this is not a significant policy. This
proposed change will not have an annual effect of $100 million or more
on the economy nor adversely affect productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or safety, nor State or local
governments. This proposed policy will not interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency nor raise new legal or policy
issues. Finally, this action will not alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients of such programs. Accordingly, this policy is
not subject to OMB review under Executive Order 12866.
Moreover, this proposed directive change has been considered in
light of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and it
has been determined that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as defined by
that Act.
Environmental Impact
Section 31.1b of Forest Service Handbook 1909.15 (57 FR 43180;
September 18, 1992) excludes from documentation in an environmental
assessment or impact statement ``rules, regulations, or policies to
establish service-wide administrative procedures, program processes, or
instructions.'' The agency's assessment is that this proposed directive
change falls within this category of actions and that no extraordinary
circumstances exist which would require preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact statement.
Unfunded Mandates Reform
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2
U.S.C. 1531-1538), which the President signed into law on March 22,
1995, the Department has assessed the effects of this proposed policy
on State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. This
proposed directive change does not compel the expenditure of $100
million or more by any State, local, or tribal governments, or anyone
in the private sector. Therefore, a statement under section 202 of the
Act is not required.
Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the Public
This proposed directive change does not contain any recordkeeping
or reporting requirements or other information collection requirements
as defined in 5 CFR 1320 and, therefore, imposes no paperwork burden on
the public. Accordingly, the review provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and implementing
regulations at 5 CFR part 1320 do not apply.
No Takings Implications
This proposed directive change has been analyzed in accordance with
the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights, and it has been determined that it would not pose the
risk of a taking of private property as they are limited to the
revision of administrative procedures.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed directive change has been reviewed under Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This proposed change will direct the
work of Forest Service employees and is not intended to preempt any
State and local laws and regulations that might be in conflict or that
would impede full implementation of this directive. The change would
not retroactively affect existing permits, contracts, or other
instruments authorizing the occupancy and use of National Forest System
lands and would not require the institution of administrative
proceedings before parties may file suit in court challenging its
provisions.
[[Page 43438]]
Dated: June 21, 2006.
Dale N. Bosworth,
Chief.
[FR Doc. E6-12310 Filed 7-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P