Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Back River, Poquoson, VA, 43400-43402 [06-6618]
Download as PDF
43400
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 147 / Tuesday, August 1, 2006 / Proposed Rules
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E6–12364 Filed 7–31–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–06–075]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Back River, Poquoson, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish special local regulations
during the ‘‘Poquoson Seafood Festival
Workboat Races’’, a marine event to be
held October 15, 2006 on the waters of
the Back River, Poquoson, Virginia.
These special local regulations are
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to temporarily
restrict vessel traffic in a portion of the
Back River during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
August 31, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(dpi), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia
23704–5004, hand-deliver them to
Room 415 at the same address between
9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays, or fax
them to (757) 398–6203. The
Inspections and Investigations Branch,
Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection of copying at the above
address between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Sens, Project Manager, Fifth
Coast Guard District, Inspections and
Investigation Branch, at (757) 398–6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:05 Jul 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD05–06–075),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger then 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to the address
listed under ADDRESSES explaining why
one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
On October 15, 2006, the City of
Poquoson will sponsor ‘‘Poquoson
Seafood Festival Workboat Races’’ on
the Back River, immediately adjacent
and south of Messick Point. The event
will consist of approximately 60
traditional Chesapeake Bay deadrise
workboats racing along a marked strait
line race course in heats of 2 to 4 boats
for a distance of approximately 600
yards. Due to the need for vessel control
during the event, the Coast Guard will
temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the
event area to provide for the safety of
participants, spectators and other
transiting vessels.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
temporary special local regulations on
specified waters of the Back River,
Poquoson, Virginia. The regulations will
be in effect from 12 p.m. to 5 p.m. on
October 15, 2006. The effect will be to
restrict general navigation in the
regulated area during the event. Except
for persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area. Vessel traffic will be
allowed to transit the regulated area at
slow speed between heats, when the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander
determines it is safe to do so. These
regulations are needed to control vessel
traffic during the event to enhance the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
safety of participants, spectators and
transiting vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. Although this
regulation will prevent traffic from
transiting a portion of the Back River
during the event, the effect of this
regulation will not be significant due to
the limited duration that the regulated
area will be in effect and the extensive
advance notifications that will be made
to the maritime community via the
Local Notice to Mariners, marine
information broadcasts, area
newspapers and local radio stations, so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly. Additionally, the regulated
area has been narrowly tailored to
impose the least impact on general
navigation yet provide the level of safety
deemed necessary. vessel traffic will be
able to transit the regulated area at slow
speed between heats, when the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander deems it safe
to do so.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the affected portions of the
Back River during the event.
Although this regulation prevents
traffic from transiting a portion of the
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 147 / Tuesday, August 1, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Back River during the event, this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This proposed
rule would be in effect for only a limited
period. Vessel traffic will be able to
transit the regulated area between heats,
when the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander deems it is safe to do so.
Before the enforcement period, we will
issue maritime advisories so mariners
can adjust their plans accordingly.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the address
listed under ADDRESSES. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
Protection of Children
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:05 Jul 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
43401
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D and Department of
Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, which guides the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f),
and have concluded that there are no
factors in this case that would limit the
use of a categorical exclusion under
section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Special
local regulations issued in conjunction
with a regatta or marine parade permit
are specially excluded from further
analysis and documentation under that
section.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h),
of the Instruction, and ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we
make the final decision on whether to
categorically exclude this rule from
further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
Technical Standards
1. The authority citation for Part 100
continues to read as follows:
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
43402
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 147 / Tuesday, August 1, 2006 / Proposed Rules
2. Add a temporary § 100.35–T05–075
to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
§ 100.35–T05–075
VA.
Coast Guard
Back River, Poquoson,
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
(a) Definitions: The following
definitions apply to this section: (1)
Coast Guard Patrol Commander means
a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer of the Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Commander, Coast
Guard Sector Hampton Roads.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads
with a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(3) Participant includes all vessels
participating in the Poquoson Seafood
Festival Workboat races under the
auspices of a Marine Event Permit
issued to the event sponsor and
approved by Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Hampton Roads.
(4) Regulated area includes the waters
of the Back River, Poquoson, Virginia,
bounded on the north by a line drawn
along latitude 37°06′30″ North, bounded
on the south by a line drawn along
latitude 37°06′15″ North, bounded on
the east by a line drawn along longitude
076°18′52″ West and bounded on the
west by a line drawn along longitude
076°19′30″ West. All coordinates
reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Special local regulations: (1)
Except for event participants and
persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area shall: (i) Stop the vessel
immediately when directed to do so by
any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official
Patrol.
(iii) When authorized to transit the
regulated area, all vessels shall proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course that minimizes
wake near the race course.
(c) Effective period. This section will
be enforced from 12 p.m. to 5 p.m. on
October 15, 2006.
Dated: July 18, 2006.
S. Ratti,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth
Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. 06–6618 Filed 7–31–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:05 Jul 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09–06–123]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; U.S. Coast Guard Water
Training Areas, Great Lakes
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish safety zones throughout the
Great Lakes. These zones are intended
to restrict vessels from portions of the
Great Lakes during live fire gun
exercises that will be conducted by
Coast Guard cutters and small boats.
These safety zones are necessary to
protect the public from the hazards
associated with the firing of weapons.
DATES: Comments and related materials
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
August 31, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(dre) Ninth Coast Guard District, 1240 E.
9th Street, Room 2069, Cleveland, OH
44199. The Ninth Coast Guard District
Planning and Development Section
(dpw-1) maintains the public docket for
this rulemaking. Comments and
material received from the public, as
well as documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, will become part of this docket
and will be available for inspection or
copying between 8 a.m. (local) and 4
p.m. (local), Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commander Gustav Wulfkuhle,
Enforcement Branch, Response
Division, Ninth Coast Guard District,
Cleveland, OH at (216) 902–6091.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to submit
comments and related materials. If you
submit a comment, please include your
name and address, identify the docket
number for this rulemaking [CGD09–06–
123], indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. You may submit your
comments and material by mail (see
ADDRESSES). If you submit them by mail
or delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit them by mail and
would like to know that they reached
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period,
which may result in a modification to
the rule.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a public meeting (see ADDRESSES)
explaining why one would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is proposing to
establish these safety zones to conduct
training essential to carrying out Coast
Guard missions relating to military
operations and national security.
Accordingly, these proposed safety
zones fall within the military function
exception to the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1).
Notice and comment rulemaking under
5 U.S.C. 553(b), and an effective date of
30 days after publication under 5 U.S.C.
553(d) are not required for this
rulemaking.
However, we have determined that it
would be beneficial to accept public
comments on this proposed rule.
Therefore, we will be accepting
comments until August 31, 2006. By
issuing this notice of proposed
rulemaking and accepting public
comments, the Coast Guard does not
waive its use of the military-function
exception to notice and comment
rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
Background and Purpose
These safety zones are necessary to
protect vessels and people from hazards
associated with live fire gun exercises.
Such hazards include projectiles that
may ricochet and damage vessels and/
or cause death or serious bodily harm.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed safety zones are
necessary to ensure the safety of vessels
and people during live fire gun
exercises on the Great Lakes. Twenty-six
zones will be located throughout the
Great Lakes in order to accommodate 57
separate Coast Guard units. The
proposed safety zones are all located at
least three nautical miles from the
shoreline.
The proposed safety zones will be
enforced only upon notice by the
cognizant Captain of the Port for the
area in which the exercise will be held.
The cognizant Captain of the Port will
cause notice of the enforcement of a live
E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM
01AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 147 (Tuesday, August 1, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43400-43402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6618]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05-06-075]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Back River,
Poquoson, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish special local
regulations during the ``Poquoson Seafood Festival Workboat Races'', a
marine event to be held October 15, 2006 on the waters of the Back
River, Poquoson, Virginia. These special local regulations are
necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during
the event. This action is intended to temporarily restrict vessel
traffic in a portion of the Back River during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before August 31, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander
(dpi), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth,
Virginia 23704-5004, hand-deliver them to Room 415 at the same address
between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays, or fax them to (757) 398-6203. The Inspections and
Investigations Branch, Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the public
docket for this rulemaking. Comments and material received from the
public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part of this docket and will be
available for inspection of copying at the above address between 9 a.m.
and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Sens, Project Manager, Fifth
Coast Guard District, Inspections and Investigation Branch, at (757)
398-6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD05-06-
075), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger then
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to the address listed under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would
aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
On October 15, 2006, the City of Poquoson will sponsor ``Poquoson
Seafood Festival Workboat Races'' on the Back River, immediately
adjacent and south of Messick Point. The event will consist of
approximately 60 traditional Chesapeake Bay deadrise workboats racing
along a marked strait line race course in heats of 2 to 4 boats for a
distance of approximately 600 yards. Due to the need for vessel control
during the event, the Coast Guard will temporarily restrict vessel
traffic in the event area to provide for the safety of participants,
spectators and other transiting vessels.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish temporary special local
regulations on specified waters of the Back River, Poquoson, Virginia.
The regulations will be in effect from 12 p.m. to 5 p.m. on October 15,
2006. The effect will be to restrict general navigation in the
regulated area during the event. Except for persons or vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the regulated area. Vessel traffic will be allowed
to transit the regulated area at slow speed between heats, when the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander determines it is safe to do so. These
regulations are needed to control vessel traffic during the event to
enhance the safety of participants, spectators and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. Although this regulation will
prevent traffic from transiting a portion of the Back River during the
event, the effect of this regulation will not be significant due to the
limited duration that the regulated area will be in effect and the
extensive advance notifications that will be made to the maritime
community via the Local Notice to Mariners, marine information
broadcasts, area newspapers and local radio stations, so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly. Additionally, the regulated area has
been narrowly tailored to impose the least impact on general navigation
yet provide the level of safety deemed necessary. vessel traffic will
be able to transit the regulated area at slow speed between heats, when
the Coast Guard Patrol Commander deems it safe to do so.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in the affected
portions of the Back River during the event.
Although this regulation prevents traffic from transiting a portion
of the
[[Page 43401]]
Back River during the event, this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This proposed rule would be in effect for
only a limited period. Vessel traffic will be able to transit the
regulated area between heats, when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander
deems it is safe to do so. Before the enforcement period, we will issue
maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the address listed under
ADDRESSES. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive
5100.1, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Special local regulations issued in
conjunction with a regatta or marine parade permit are specially
excluded from further analysis and documentation under that section.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, and
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we make the final decision on whether
to categorically exclude this rule from further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for Part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
[[Page 43402]]
2. Add a temporary Sec. 100.35-T05-075 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35-T05-075 Back River, Poquoson, VA.
(a) Definitions: The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads with a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(3) Participant includes all vessels participating in the Poquoson
Seafood Festival Workboat races under the auspices of a Marine Event
Permit issued to the event sponsor and approved by Commander, Coast
Guard Sector Hampton Roads.
(4) Regulated area includes the waters of the Back River, Poquoson,
Virginia, bounded on the north by a line drawn along latitude
37[deg]06[min]30[sec] North, bounded on the south by a line drawn along
latitude 37[deg]06[min]15[sec] North, bounded on the east by a line
drawn along longitude 076[deg]18[min]52[sec] West and bounded on the
west by a line drawn along longitude 076[deg]19[min]30[sec] West. All
coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Special local regulations: (1) Except for event participants
and persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area shall: (i)
Stop the vessel immediately when directed to do so by any Official
Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official Patrol.
(iii) When authorized to transit the regulated area, all vessels
shall proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course
that minimizes wake near the race course.
(c) Effective period. This section will be enforced from 12 p.m. to
5 p.m. on October 15, 2006.
Dated: July 18, 2006.
S. Ratti,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District,
Acting.
[FR Doc. 06-6618 Filed 7-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M