Revision of Timber Sale Contract Forms FS-2400-6 and FS-2400-6T, 43096-43098 [E6-12177]
Download as PDF
43096
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 146 / Monday, July 31, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
• Guiding the implementation of new
and modified inspection programs and
procedures;
• Interacting with other program
areas to assure information exchange
and uniformity of regulatory issues
within the Agency;
• Working with the FSIS Center for
Learning to develop and deliver
training;
• Analyzing data in major Agency
databases for recurring and specific
project requirements; and
• Identifying emerging data analysis
and management needs, including
developing, piloting, implementing, and
maintaining databases and reporting
systems, and raising policy and program
issues based on that analysis.
Significantly, the TSC does not
provide a forum for resolving disputes
between inspection personnel and plant
management, nor does it rule on
appeals. This is a function of the chain
of command and the appeals process is
described in 9 CFR 306.5. The role of
the TSC is to assist decision making by
providing all parties with the standards
and other technical information needed
to understand, implement, apply, and
enforce regulatory requirements. Two
TSC staffs, both within the FSIS Office
of Policy, Program & Employee
Development, provide the services
described above. The Technical
Assistance/Correlation Staff (TAC)
provides technical expertise, guidance
and correlation. The Program Analysis
Staff (PAS) conducts data analysis and
special studies concerning Agency
program operations.
FSIS is now seeking broader input on
the organization, operations, and
services provided by the TSC, with the
intent of improving TSC programs. As
part of a comprehensive evaluation of
TSC operations and services, the
Agency is seeking comments from the
public and especially from small
businesses. Feedback from small
businesses is being requested
specifically as a result of the Agency’s
initiative to improve its outreach to
small and very small plants to further
improve their food safety programs.
Questions
All relevant comments are welcome,
but FSIS specifically seeks responses
from the regulated industry to the
following questions:
• In what way has the availability of
TSC services helped you with your
operations?
• When you have contacted the TSC,
has the response been prompt, clear,
thorough, and courteous?
• Is the technical guidance provided
by the TSC consistent with regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jul 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
and policy as written? Is the technical
guidance consistent with guidance
given by FSIS inspection program
personnel?
• Have you used the TSC website? If
so, has it been useful?
• If you have contacted the TSC
multiple times regarding the same topic,
has the guidance been consistent over
time?
• How could the TSC improve its
services?
• Have you had difficulty in reaching
the TSC staff?
• What recommendations do you
have for TSC in communicating
information to you?
• What specifically could the TSC do
to improve its services to small
businesses?
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of
rulemaking and policy development is
important. Consequently, in an effort to
ensure that the public and in particular
minorities, women, and persons with
disabilities, are aware of this notice,
FSIS will announce it on-line through
the FSIS web page located at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations/
2006_Notices_Index/index.asp.
FSIS also will make copies of this
Federal Register publication available
through the FSIS Constituent Update,
which is used to provide information
regarding FSIS policies, procedures,
regulations, Federal Register notices,
FSIS public meetings, recalls, and other
types of information that could affect or
would be of interest to our constituents
and stakeholders. The update is
communicated via Listserv, a free e-mail
subscription service consisting of
industry, trade, and farm groups,
consumer interest groups, allied health
professionals, scientific professionals,
and other individuals who have
requested to be included. The update
also is available on the FSIS web page.
Through Listserv and the web page,
FSIS is able to provide information to a
much broader, more diverse audience.
In addition, FSIS offers an email
subscription service which provides
automatic and customized access to
selected food safety news and
information. This service is available at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
news_and_events/email_subscription/
Options range from recalls to export
information to regulations, directives
and notices. Customers can add or
delete subscriptions themselves and
have the option to password protect
their account.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Done at Washington, DC, on July 26, 2006.
Barbara J. Masters,
D.V.M. Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–12217 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Revision of Timber Sale Contract
Forms FS–2400–6 and FS–2400–6T
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of Availability; revised
standard timber sale contracts.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: By this notice, the Forest
Service is putting into use revised
versions of its standard timber sale
contracts, Form FS–2400–6, for scaled
sale procedures, and Form FS–2400–6T,
for tree measurement timber sale
procedures. After the Forest Service
issued substantially revised versions of
these contracts on May 6, 2004, the
agency continued to receive comments
from industry stakeholders. In response
to these comments, the Forest Service
engaged a consultant to evaluate the
contracts with regard to allocation of
risk between the timber Purchaser and
the agency. The present revisions reflect
the agency’s further analysis of the
contracts in light of the stakeholders’
comments and the consultant’s
conclusions. A side-by-side comparison
of the revised contracts and the previous
versions is available as provided in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice.
DATES: The contract revisions will be
implemented for contracts advertised
after August 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: These timber sale contract
forms are available for public review on
the Forest Service worldwide Web/
Internet site at https://www.fs.fed.us/
forestmanagement/infocenter/
newcontracts/index.shtml.
Alternatively, the contracts can be
reviewed in the office of the Director of
Forest Management, Third Floor,
Northwest Wing, Yates Building, 201
14th Street, SW., Washington, DC.
Visitors are encouraged to call ahead to
(202) 205–0893 to facilitate entry into
the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lathrop Smith, Forest Management
Staff, (202) 205–0858.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Forest Service uses standard
contracts for all large, complex sales of
timber from National Forest System
lands. The agency uses timber sale
contract Form FS–2400–6 when timber
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 146 / Monday, July 31, 2006 / Notices
is measured for payment after it is
harvested; it uses timber sale contract
Form FS–2400–6T when the basis for
payment is measurement prior to sale.
These instruments are comprehensive in
scope and are designed to fully set forth
the respective rights and obligations of
the Forest Service and the timber
Purchaser.
The Forest Service first put the
standard timber sale contracts into use
in the early 1970s, after extensive
discussions with representatives of the
timber industry. Based upon its initial
experience with the contracts, which
included feedback from stakeholders,
and because of certain policy changes,
the Forest Service retooled the contracts
in late 1973. The agency did not revise
the contracts again until 2001, when it
updated them to reflect changes in law
and agency policy and to incorporate
certain special provisions that, over
time, had become applicable to most
timber sales. These changes did not
materially alter the rights and
obligations of the Purchaser and the
Forest Service.
On May 6, 2004, after notice and
comment, the Forest Service released
substantially revised versions of its FS–
2400–6 and FS–2400–6T contracts. As a
general matter, the agency sought to
make the contracts more consistent with
government contracts law and policy. In
particular, the agency attempted to
address many of the complicated issues
that arise when the Forest Service must
suspend, modify, or terminate a timber
sale contract because of environmental
considerations. In this regard, the
agency sought to clarify and simplify
existing contract remedies, and to
establish new remedies for certain
situations, such as liquidated damages
and rate redetermination. The agency
also sought to allow the Purchaser to
protect its interests by giving it the right
to terminate the contract under certain
circumstances. Through these
modifications, the Forest Service
attempted to allocate risk fairly between
itself and the Purchaser.
After the release of the revised
contracts, some timber industry
stakeholders continued to provide
feedback to the Forest Service on an adhoc basis. Although comments varied,
some industry stakeholders expressed
concerns over the contracts’ allocation
of risk, including the provisions on
delay, suspension, or termination of
operations. In particular, some
stakeholders suggested that the 2004
contracts did not provide fair
compensation to the Purchaser for
delay, suspension, and termination, and
thus exposed the Purchaser to
substantial risk. To explore these
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jul 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
concerns, the Forest Service decided to
engage an outside consultant to review
the contracts and to issue a report on the
allocation of risk between the Purchaser
and the agency.
The consultant’s report generally
concluded that the revised timber sale
contracts allocated risk to the detriment
of the Purchaser. In reaching this
conclusion, the report focused upon
provisions giving the Forest Service the
unilateral right to delay, suspend,
modify, or terminate the contracts. The
consultant asserted that these provisions
forced the Purchaser to accept too much
uncertainty and, at the same time, failed
to provide adequate compensation.
However, the report also noted several
key provisions that favored the
Purchaser, including making liquidated
damages available under certain
circumstances and allowing for an
emergency rate redetermination for
severe decline in the timber market.
After evaluating the outside
consultant’s report and considering the
feedback that it received from industry
stakeholders, the Forest Service decided
to revise certain provisions of the
contracts to achieve a more equitable
distribution of risk. In making these
changes, the agency did not simply
adopt the recommendations of the
consultant or the comments of certain
industry representatives. Rather, the
agency used this information to broaden
its frame of reference in dealing with
some of the more complicated aspects of
the timber sale contracts, while keeping
in mind its fundamental obligations to
protect the public interest and, under
the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act,
to manage to National Forest System
lands ‘‘in the combination that will best
meet the needs of the American
people.’’ 16 U.S.C. 531. Considering the
foregoing, the Forest Service has revised
the contracts to balance risk fairly
between the agency, as the steward of
the Nation’s forest lands, and the
Purchaser, as a competitive enterprise.
Contract Revisions and Explanation
1. B4.22 Temporary Reduction of
Downpayment. The timber sale
contracts require the Purchaser to make
a downpayment before commencing
harvesting operations and to maintain it
until completion of operations. The
downpayment covers 10 percent of the
advertised value of the timber sale plus
20 percent of the value of the bid
premium to discourage speculative
bidding. For larger timber sales, the
amount of the downpayment can be
substantial. The previous iteration of
this provision required the Purchaser to
wait 90 days, from the beginning of any
delay or interruption ordered by the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43097
agency, before the downpayment could
be reduced and refunded or transferred
to another account. After considering
stakeholders’ concern that the 90 day
period unfairly froze the Purchaser’s
financial resources, the Forest Service
has reduced the waiting period to 30
days.
2. B.5.27 Temporary Credit for
Unamortized Specified Road
Construction Cost. For the same
rationale identified in Item 1, above, the
Forest Service has reduced the
applicable waiting period before credit
can be issued to the Purchaser for the
unamortized cost of specified roads. The
period is reduced from 90 days to 30
days.
3. B6.24 Protection Measures
Needed for Plants, Animals, Cultural
Resources, and Cave Resources. This
provision has been revised to clarify the
respective responsibilities of the Forest
Service and the Purchaser with regard to
areas within the Sale Area needing
special measures for the protection of
plants, animals, cultural resources, and/
or cave resources. The previous iteration
of the contract placed an affirmative
duty on the Purchaser to protect known
and identified resources. To eliminate
stakeholders’ uncertainty as to the
extent of the Purchaser’s duty and to
diminish potential liability, the Forest
Service has revised this provision to
contain a simple, negative duty not to
damage or disturb designated areas.
Additionally, this provision retains
the disclaimer applicable to the Forest
Service’s identification of protected
areas. Because the agency cannot
control environmental conditions
affecting a sale, which are inherently
subject to natural change, and because
of its various obligations to protect the
environment, which exist under federal
law, the agency cannot warrant that
specified protective measures will
remain adequate over the life of a sale.
Instead, the Forest Service must include
a disclaimer to avoid exposure to
liability.
4. B6.35 Equipment Cleaning. This
provision has been revised primarily to
clarify the circumstances that trigger the
Purchaser’s obligation to clean Off-Road
Equipment to protect against the spread
of invasive species of concern. If this
provision materially increases the
purchaser’s operating costs, then the
increased operating costs would be
factored into the appraised value for the
timber sale.
5. B8.33 Contract Suspension and
Modification. This provision has been
revised to clarify the remedies that are
available to the Purchaser in the event
that the Contracting Officer must delay,
suspend, or modify contract operations.
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
43098
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 146 / Monday, July 31, 2006 / Notices
References to termination contained in
the previous iteration of this provision
were confusing to stakeholders.
Accordingly, the Forest Service has
deleted these references and has
substantially revised provisions B8.34
and B8.36 to address, among other
things, the Purchaser’s right to terminate
the contract under various
circumstances. The revised version of
this provision also clarifies that out-ofpocket expenses, in addition to a rate
redetermination, shall be available to
the Purchaser when a delay or
suspension accompanies a contract
modification. Additionally, the
subsection addressing the provision’s
applicability has been revised to affirm
the Purchaser’s ability to exercise its
rights under the Contract Disputes Act.
Ambiguity in the previous iteration
caused some stakeholders to believe that
the Forest Service had attempted to
eliminate these rights.
6. B8.34 Contract Termination. The
Forest Service has divided the main
provision governing contract
termination into three separate parts to
eliminate ambiguity that existed in the
previous iteration, and, thereby, to
remove stakeholders’ uncertainty as to
the Purchaser’s rights and obligations.
After the introductory part, separate
parts address termination by the agency
and termination by the Purchaser. In
response to comments from
stakeholders and after conducting its
own analysis, the Forest Service has
decided to make replacement timber
volume and liquidated damages
available as a remedy for termination
and partial termination. The agency has
qualified the availability of liquidated
damages, allowing this remedy only if,
after good faith negotiations, the parties
cannot agree on the location or
stumpage for the replacement volume.
However, if replacement volume is less
than the deleted volume, liquidated
damages shall be applicable to the
shortfall. The Forest Service believes
that the availability of replacement
volume and/or liquidated damages
substantially improves the contracts’
allocation of risk and ensures that the
Purchaser shall be fairly compensated in
instances of full or partial termination.
7. B8.35 Out-of-Pocket Expenses.
The revision responds to comments
from stakeholders that the list of out-ofpocket expenses was too limited. The
provision now specifically includes
expenses for road maintenance, dust
abatement, and certain authorized
improvements. Additionally, in order to
foster consistent application, the
provision specifically lists items that do
not qualify as out-of-pocket expenses.
These items are disallowed because they
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jul 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
are not directly related to the
Purchaser’s operations under the
contract. To facilitate expeditious and
accurate claims processing, the
provision requires the Purchaser to
submit documentation and supporting
analysis for expenses that it has paid or
that it has a legal obligation to pay.
8. B8.36 Termination for Market
Changes. This revision provides another
set of circumstances under which the
Purchaser may terminate the contract
for market change during a delay or
interruption under B8.33.
9. B9.13 Temporary Bond
Reduction. Consistent with the changes
to B4.22 and B5.27, described above, the
revision allows the Purchaser’s
performance bond to be temporarily
reduced after 30 days during a delay or
a suspension.
A side-by-side comparison of the
specific differences between the existing
contracts and the proposed revised
contracts is available electronically and
in paper copy as provided in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice.
Dated: July 19, 2006.
Dale N. Bosworth,
Chief.
[FR Doc. E6–12177 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
Request for Proposals: Fiscal Year
2006 Funding Opportunity for
Research on the Economic Impact of
Cooperatives
Rural Business-Cooperative
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Initial Notice of Request for
Proposals.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Rural Business-Cooperative
Service programs are administered
through USDA Rural Development.
USDA Rural Development announces
the availability of approximately
$495,000 in competitive cooperative
agreement funds for fiscal year (FY)
2006 to conduct research on the
national economic impact of all types of
cooperatives. USDA Rural Development
hereby requests proposals from
institutions of higher education
interested in applying for a
competitively awarded cooperative
research agreement. The intent of the
funding is to encourage research on the
critical issue of the economic value of
cooperatives.
DATES: Interested parties may submit
completed applications for the
cooperative agreement on paper or
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
electronically according to the following
deadlines:
Paper copies must be postmarked and
mailed, shipped, or sent overnight no
later than August 30, 2006, to be eligible
for FY 2006 funding. Electronic copies
must be received by August 30, 2006, to
be eligible for FY 2006 funding. Late
applications are not eligible for FY 2006
funding.
ADDRESSES: Applicants may obtain
application forms, guides, and materials
for the cooperative agreement at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
reic.htm or by contacting USDA Rural
Development at (202) 690–0368, (TDD:
(800) 877–8339, Federal Information
Relay Service) and ask for the
cooperative research agreement
application kit.
Submit completed paper applications
for a cooperative agreement to USDA
Rural Development’s Cooperative
Programs, Attn: Cooperative Research,
Mail STOP 3250, Room 4016—South,
1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3250. The
phone number that should be used for
FedEx packages is (202) 720–7558.
Submit electronic applications at
https://www.grants.gov, following the
instructions found on this Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Visit
the program Web site at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
reic.htm, which contains application
guidance, including an Application
Guide and application forms. Or you
may contact USDA Rural Development
at (202) 690–0368 (TDD: (800) 877–8339
Federal Information Relay Service).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., OMB must
approve all ‘‘collections of information’’
by USDA Rural Development. The Act
defines ‘‘collection of information’’ as a
requirement for ‘‘answers to * * *
identical reporting or recordkeeping
requirements imposed on ten or more
persons * * *.’’ (44 U.S.C. 3502(3)(A))
Because the RFP will receive less than
10 respondents, the Paperwork
Reduction Act does not apply.
Overview
Federal Agency: Rural BusinessCooperative Service.
Funding Opportunity Title: Research
on the Economic Impact of
Cooperatives.
Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 10.778.
Dates: You may submit completed
applications for the cooperative
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 146 (Monday, July 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43096-43098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12177]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Revision of Timber Sale Contract Forms FS-2400-6 and FS-2400-6T
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Availability; revised standard timber sale contracts.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: By this notice, the Forest Service is putting into use revised
versions of its standard timber sale contracts, Form FS-2400-6, for
scaled sale procedures, and Form FS-2400-6T, for tree measurement
timber sale procedures. After the Forest Service issued substantially
revised versions of these contracts on May 6, 2004, the agency
continued to receive comments from industry stakeholders. In response
to these comments, the Forest Service engaged a consultant to evaluate
the contracts with regard to allocation of risk between the timber
Purchaser and the agency. The present revisions reflect the agency's
further analysis of the contracts in light of the stakeholders'
comments and the consultant's conclusions. A side-by-side comparison of
the revised contracts and the previous versions is available as
provided in the ADDRESSES section of this notice.
DATES: The contract revisions will be implemented for contracts
advertised after August 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: These timber sale contract forms are available for public
review on the Forest Service worldwide Web/Internet site at https://
www.fs.fed.us/forestmanagement/infocenter/newcontracts/index.shtml.
Alternatively, the contracts can be reviewed in the office of the
Director of Forest Management, Third Floor, Northwest Wing, Yates
Building, 201 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC. Visitors are encouraged
to call ahead to (202) 205-0893 to facilitate entry into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lathrop Smith, Forest Management
Staff, (202) 205-0858.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Forest Service uses standard contracts for all large, complex
sales of timber from National Forest System lands. The agency uses
timber sale contract Form FS-2400-6 when timber
[[Page 43097]]
is measured for payment after it is harvested; it uses timber sale
contract Form FS-2400-6T when the basis for payment is measurement
prior to sale. These instruments are comprehensive in scope and are
designed to fully set forth the respective rights and obligations of
the Forest Service and the timber Purchaser.
The Forest Service first put the standard timber sale contracts
into use in the early 1970s, after extensive discussions with
representatives of the timber industry. Based upon its initial
experience with the contracts, which included feedback from
stakeholders, and because of certain policy changes, the Forest Service
retooled the contracts in late 1973. The agency did not revise the
contracts again until 2001, when it updated them to reflect changes in
law and agency policy and to incorporate certain special provisions
that, over time, had become applicable to most timber sales. These
changes did not materially alter the rights and obligations of the
Purchaser and the Forest Service.
On May 6, 2004, after notice and comment, the Forest Service
released substantially revised versions of its FS-2400-6 and FS-2400-6T
contracts. As a general matter, the agency sought to make the contracts
more consistent with government contracts law and policy. In
particular, the agency attempted to address many of the complicated
issues that arise when the Forest Service must suspend, modify, or
terminate a timber sale contract because of environmental
considerations. In this regard, the agency sought to clarify and
simplify existing contract remedies, and to establish new remedies for
certain situations, such as liquidated damages and rate
redetermination. The agency also sought to allow the Purchaser to
protect its interests by giving it the right to terminate the contract
under certain circumstances. Through these modifications, the Forest
Service attempted to allocate risk fairly between itself and the
Purchaser.
After the release of the revised contracts, some timber industry
stakeholders continued to provide feedback to the Forest Service on an
ad-hoc basis. Although comments varied, some industry stakeholders
expressed concerns over the contracts' allocation of risk, including
the provisions on delay, suspension, or termination of operations. In
particular, some stakeholders suggested that the 2004 contracts did not
provide fair compensation to the Purchaser for delay, suspension, and
termination, and thus exposed the Purchaser to substantial risk. To
explore these concerns, the Forest Service decided to engage an outside
consultant to review the contracts and to issue a report on the
allocation of risk between the Purchaser and the agency.
The consultant's report generally concluded that the revised timber
sale contracts allocated risk to the detriment of the Purchaser. In
reaching this conclusion, the report focused upon provisions giving the
Forest Service the unilateral right to delay, suspend, modify, or
terminate the contracts. The consultant asserted that these provisions
forced the Purchaser to accept too much uncertainty and, at the same
time, failed to provide adequate compensation. However, the report also
noted several key provisions that favored the Purchaser, including
making liquidated damages available under certain circumstances and
allowing for an emergency rate redetermination for severe decline in
the timber market.
After evaluating the outside consultant's report and considering
the feedback that it received from industry stakeholders, the Forest
Service decided to revise certain provisions of the contracts to
achieve a more equitable distribution of risk. In making these changes,
the agency did not simply adopt the recommendations of the consultant
or the comments of certain industry representatives. Rather, the agency
used this information to broaden its frame of reference in dealing with
some of the more complicated aspects of the timber sale contracts,
while keeping in mind its fundamental obligations to protect the public
interest and, under the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act, to manage to
National Forest System lands ``in the combination that will best meet
the needs of the American people.'' 16 U.S.C. 531. Considering the
foregoing, the Forest Service has revised the contracts to balance risk
fairly between the agency, as the steward of the Nation's forest lands,
and the Purchaser, as a competitive enterprise.
Contract Revisions and Explanation
1. B4.22 Temporary Reduction of Downpayment. The timber sale
contracts require the Purchaser to make a downpayment before commencing
harvesting operations and to maintain it until completion of
operations. The downpayment covers 10 percent of the advertised value
of the timber sale plus 20 percent of the value of the bid premium to
discourage speculative bidding. For larger timber sales, the amount of
the downpayment can be substantial. The previous iteration of this
provision required the Purchaser to wait 90 days, from the beginning of
any delay or interruption ordered by the agency, before the downpayment
could be reduced and refunded or transferred to another account. After
considering stakeholders' concern that the 90 day period unfairly froze
the Purchaser's financial resources, the Forest Service has reduced the
waiting period to 30 days.
2. B.5.27 Temporary Credit for Unamortized Specified Road
Construction Cost. For the same rationale identified in Item 1, above,
the Forest Service has reduced the applicable waiting period before
credit can be issued to the Purchaser for the unamortized cost of
specified roads. The period is reduced from 90 days to 30 days.
3. B6.24 Protection Measures Needed for Plants, Animals, Cultural
Resources, and Cave Resources. This provision has been revised to
clarify the respective responsibilities of the Forest Service and the
Purchaser with regard to areas within the Sale Area needing special
measures for the protection of plants, animals, cultural resources,
and/or cave resources. The previous iteration of the contract placed an
affirmative duty on the Purchaser to protect known and identified
resources. To eliminate stakeholders' uncertainty as to the extent of
the Purchaser's duty and to diminish potential liability, the Forest
Service has revised this provision to contain a simple, negative duty
not to damage or disturb designated areas.
Additionally, this provision retains the disclaimer applicable to
the Forest Service's identification of protected areas. Because the
agency cannot control environmental conditions affecting a sale, which
are inherently subject to natural change, and because of its various
obligations to protect the environment, which exist under federal law,
the agency cannot warrant that specified protective measures will
remain adequate over the life of a sale. Instead, the Forest Service
must include a disclaimer to avoid exposure to liability.
4. B6.35 Equipment Cleaning. This provision has been revised
primarily to clarify the circumstances that trigger the Purchaser's
obligation to clean Off-Road Equipment to protect against the spread of
invasive species of concern. If this provision materially increases the
purchaser's operating costs, then the increased operating costs would
be factored into the appraised value for the timber sale.
5. B8.33 Contract Suspension and Modification. This provision has
been revised to clarify the remedies that are available to the
Purchaser in the event that the Contracting Officer must delay,
suspend, or modify contract operations.
[[Page 43098]]
References to termination contained in the previous iteration of this
provision were confusing to stakeholders. Accordingly, the Forest
Service has deleted these references and has substantially revised
provisions B8.34 and B8.36 to address, among other things, the
Purchaser's right to terminate the contract under various
circumstances. The revised version of this provision also clarifies
that out-of-pocket expenses, in addition to a rate redetermination,
shall be available to the Purchaser when a delay or suspension
accompanies a contract modification. Additionally, the subsection
addressing the provision's applicability has been revised to affirm the
Purchaser's ability to exercise its rights under the Contract Disputes
Act. Ambiguity in the previous iteration caused some stakeholders to
believe that the Forest Service had attempted to eliminate these
rights.
6. B8.34 Contract Termination. The Forest Service has divided the
main provision governing contract termination into three separate parts
to eliminate ambiguity that existed in the previous iteration, and,
thereby, to remove stakeholders' uncertainty as to the Purchaser's
rights and obligations. After the introductory part, separate parts
address termination by the agency and termination by the Purchaser. In
response to comments from stakeholders and after conducting its own
analysis, the Forest Service has decided to make replacement timber
volume and liquidated damages available as a remedy for termination and
partial termination. The agency has qualified the availability of
liquidated damages, allowing this remedy only if, after good faith
negotiations, the parties cannot agree on the location or stumpage for
the replacement volume. However, if replacement volume is less than the
deleted volume, liquidated damages shall be applicable to the
shortfall. The Forest Service believes that the availability of
replacement volume and/or liquidated damages substantially improves the
contracts' allocation of risk and ensures that the Purchaser shall be
fairly compensated in instances of full or partial termination.
7. B8.35 Out-of-Pocket Expenses. The revision responds to comments
from stakeholders that the list of out-of-pocket expenses was too
limited. The provision now specifically includes expenses for road
maintenance, dust abatement, and certain authorized improvements.
Additionally, in order to foster consistent application, the provision
specifically lists items that do not qualify as out-of-pocket expenses.
These items are disallowed because they are not directly related to the
Purchaser's operations under the contract. To facilitate expeditious
and accurate claims processing, the provision requires the Purchaser to
submit documentation and supporting analysis for expenses that it has
paid or that it has a legal obligation to pay.
8. B8.36 Termination for Market Changes. This revision provides
another set of circumstances under which the Purchaser may terminate
the contract for market change during a delay or interruption under
B8.33.
9. B9.13 Temporary Bond Reduction. Consistent with the changes to
B4.22 and B5.27, described above, the revision allows the Purchaser's
performance bond to be temporarily reduced after 30 days during a delay
or a suspension.
A side-by-side comparison of the specific differences between the
existing contracts and the proposed revised contracts is available
electronically and in paper copy as provided in the ADDRESSES section
of this notice.
Dated: July 19, 2006.
Dale N. Bosworth,
Chief.
[FR Doc. E6-12177 Filed 7-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P