Request for Proposals: Fiscal Year 2006 Funding Opportunity for Research on the Economic Impact of Cooperatives, 43098-43103 [E6-12166]
Download as PDF
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
43098
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 146 / Monday, July 31, 2006 / Notices
References to termination contained in
the previous iteration of this provision
were confusing to stakeholders.
Accordingly, the Forest Service has
deleted these references and has
substantially revised provisions B8.34
and B8.36 to address, among other
things, the Purchaser’s right to terminate
the contract under various
circumstances. The revised version of
this provision also clarifies that out-ofpocket expenses, in addition to a rate
redetermination, shall be available to
the Purchaser when a delay or
suspension accompanies a contract
modification. Additionally, the
subsection addressing the provision’s
applicability has been revised to affirm
the Purchaser’s ability to exercise its
rights under the Contract Disputes Act.
Ambiguity in the previous iteration
caused some stakeholders to believe that
the Forest Service had attempted to
eliminate these rights.
6. B8.34 Contract Termination. The
Forest Service has divided the main
provision governing contract
termination into three separate parts to
eliminate ambiguity that existed in the
previous iteration, and, thereby, to
remove stakeholders’ uncertainty as to
the Purchaser’s rights and obligations.
After the introductory part, separate
parts address termination by the agency
and termination by the Purchaser. In
response to comments from
stakeholders and after conducting its
own analysis, the Forest Service has
decided to make replacement timber
volume and liquidated damages
available as a remedy for termination
and partial termination. The agency has
qualified the availability of liquidated
damages, allowing this remedy only if,
after good faith negotiations, the parties
cannot agree on the location or
stumpage for the replacement volume.
However, if replacement volume is less
than the deleted volume, liquidated
damages shall be applicable to the
shortfall. The Forest Service believes
that the availability of replacement
volume and/or liquidated damages
substantially improves the contracts’
allocation of risk and ensures that the
Purchaser shall be fairly compensated in
instances of full or partial termination.
7. B8.35 Out-of-Pocket Expenses.
The revision responds to comments
from stakeholders that the list of out-ofpocket expenses was too limited. The
provision now specifically includes
expenses for road maintenance, dust
abatement, and certain authorized
improvements. Additionally, in order to
foster consistent application, the
provision specifically lists items that do
not qualify as out-of-pocket expenses.
These items are disallowed because they
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jul 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
are not directly related to the
Purchaser’s operations under the
contract. To facilitate expeditious and
accurate claims processing, the
provision requires the Purchaser to
submit documentation and supporting
analysis for expenses that it has paid or
that it has a legal obligation to pay.
8. B8.36 Termination for Market
Changes. This revision provides another
set of circumstances under which the
Purchaser may terminate the contract
for market change during a delay or
interruption under B8.33.
9. B9.13 Temporary Bond
Reduction. Consistent with the changes
to B4.22 and B5.27, described above, the
revision allows the Purchaser’s
performance bond to be temporarily
reduced after 30 days during a delay or
a suspension.
A side-by-side comparison of the
specific differences between the existing
contracts and the proposed revised
contracts is available electronically and
in paper copy as provided in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice.
Dated: July 19, 2006.
Dale N. Bosworth,
Chief.
[FR Doc. E6–12177 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
Request for Proposals: Fiscal Year
2006 Funding Opportunity for
Research on the Economic Impact of
Cooperatives
Rural Business-Cooperative
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Initial Notice of Request for
Proposals.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Rural Business-Cooperative
Service programs are administered
through USDA Rural Development.
USDA Rural Development announces
the availability of approximately
$495,000 in competitive cooperative
agreement funds for fiscal year (FY)
2006 to conduct research on the
national economic impact of all types of
cooperatives. USDA Rural Development
hereby requests proposals from
institutions of higher education
interested in applying for a
competitively awarded cooperative
research agreement. The intent of the
funding is to encourage research on the
critical issue of the economic value of
cooperatives.
DATES: Interested parties may submit
completed applications for the
cooperative agreement on paper or
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
electronically according to the following
deadlines:
Paper copies must be postmarked and
mailed, shipped, or sent overnight no
later than August 30, 2006, to be eligible
for FY 2006 funding. Electronic copies
must be received by August 30, 2006, to
be eligible for FY 2006 funding. Late
applications are not eligible for FY 2006
funding.
ADDRESSES: Applicants may obtain
application forms, guides, and materials
for the cooperative agreement at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
reic.htm or by contacting USDA Rural
Development at (202) 690–0368, (TDD:
(800) 877–8339, Federal Information
Relay Service) and ask for the
cooperative research agreement
application kit.
Submit completed paper applications
for a cooperative agreement to USDA
Rural Development’s Cooperative
Programs, Attn: Cooperative Research,
Mail STOP 3250, Room 4016—South,
1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3250. The
phone number that should be used for
FedEx packages is (202) 720–7558.
Submit electronic applications at
https://www.grants.gov, following the
instructions found on this Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Visit
the program Web site at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
reic.htm, which contains application
guidance, including an Application
Guide and application forms. Or you
may contact USDA Rural Development
at (202) 690–0368 (TDD: (800) 877–8339
Federal Information Relay Service).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., OMB must
approve all ‘‘collections of information’’
by USDA Rural Development. The Act
defines ‘‘collection of information’’ as a
requirement for ‘‘answers to * * *
identical reporting or recordkeeping
requirements imposed on ten or more
persons * * *.’’ (44 U.S.C. 3502(3)(A))
Because the RFP will receive less than
10 respondents, the Paperwork
Reduction Act does not apply.
Overview
Federal Agency: Rural BusinessCooperative Service.
Funding Opportunity Title: Research
on the Economic Impact of
Cooperatives.
Announcement Type: Initial
announcement.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 10.778.
Dates: You may submit completed
applications for the cooperative
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 146 / Monday, July 31, 2006 / Notices
agreement on paper or electronically
according to the following deadlines:
Paper copies must be postmarked and
mailed, shipped, or sent overnight no
later than August 30, 2006, to be eligible
for FY 2006 funding. Late applications
are not eligible for FY 2006 funding.
Electronic copies must be received by
August 30, 2006, to be eligible for FY
2006 funding. Late applications are not
eligible for FY 2006 funding.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13): There is no public
reporting burden associated with this
notice.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
I. Funding Opportunity Description
This solicitation is issued pursuant to
the Agriculture, Rural Development,
Food and Drug Administration, and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
2006 (Pub. L. 109–97 ), as amended by
the Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 2006 (Pub. L. 109–
148) directing funds ‘‘for a cooperative
research agreement with a qualified
academic institution to conduct
research on the national economic
impact of all types of cooperatives.’’ The
Secretary of Agriculture has delegated
the program’s administration to USDA
Rural Development.
The primary objective of this
cooperative research agreement program
is to facilitate university research on the
national economic impact of
cooperatives. The research program will
need to develop a methodology for
collecting and assembling basic impact
data on a periodic basis; apply the
methodology to collect data and
estimate economic impact of
cooperatives; estimate cooperative
specific community impact multipliers;
and conduct other appropriate studies
to examine the cumulative economic
impact of cooperatives on their local
communities.
The cooperative agreement proposal
must address the following deliverables:
1. Development of a methodology for
collection and assembly of basic impact
data on a periodic basis. This
methodology will need to account for
cooperative organizational complexity,
such as a single organization’s several
local, regional, and national locations,
as well as sector differences.
2. Application of the developed
methodology, by major sector, to collect
data and estimate economic impact of
cooperatives. Data items to be collected/
measured must include:
• Number and location of
cooperatives,
• Volume measures appropriate for
each sector (revenues, dollar value, and
other appropriate size indicators),
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jul 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
• Number of persons impacted by the
cooperative (members, patrons, or
investors), and
• Number of full-time equivalent jobs
and other economic impact variables.
Sectors for which summary data
should be prepared include:
• Housing,
• Health care,
• Daycare/elder care,
• Financial services,
• Grocery/consumer retail,
• Business-to-business (wholesaling,
manufacturing),
• Agricultural marketing (including
organic and conventional),
• Agricultural supplies and services,
• Public services (including
transportation and education),
• Biofuels, and
• Utilities.
3. Creation and population of a
database for individual cooperative and
summary data collected. Database is to
be delivered to USDA Rural
Development.
4. Estimation of cooperative specific
community impact multipliers for each
of the following four categories or
classes of cooperatives:
i. Commercial sales or marketing—
includes farm supply and marketing,
grocery and consumer goods, businessto-business, emerging ethanol and
biofuels related industry, and
manufacturing.
ii. Social and public services—
includes housing, health care, day care/
elder care, transportation, and
educational services.
iii. Financial services—includes
credit unions, banks, and mutual
insurance.
iv. Utilities—includes electric,
telephone, water, waste, and other
regulated utilities.
5. Performance of subcontracting
services, oversight, and financial
controls for the overall project.
6. Submission of quarterly progress
reports and quarterly financial reports to
USDA Rural Development.
7. Preparation and submission of
publishable quality written reports for
Deliverables 2 and 4 to USDA Rural
Development.
USDA Rural Development will
competitively award one cooperative
agreement to fund the collection and
analysis of data to determine the
national economic impact of
cooperatives. An institution of higher
education may subcontract or
collaborate with others on the research
and data collection. A formal
consortium of academic institutions is
allowed.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43099
Definitions
The definitions at 7 CFR 3019.2 are
incorporated by reference.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2006.
Approximate Total Funding:
$495,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award:
$495,000.
Floor of Award Range: None.
Ceiling of Award Range: $495,000.
Anticipated Award Date: September
15, 2006.
Budget Period Length: 24 months.
Project Period Length: 24 months.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
Applicants must be institutions of
higher education. Proposals may be
submitted by public or private colleges
or universities, research foundations
maintained by a college or university, or
private nonprofit organizations funded
by a group of colleges or universities.
Under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of
1995, an organization described in
section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(4))
which engages in lobbying activities, is
not eligible to apply.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
Matching funds are not required but
are highly encouraged. Applicants must
verify in their applications that
matching funds are available for the
time period of the agreement if the
matching funds are required to complete
the project. Matching funds must be
provided by either the applicant or by
a third party in the form of cash or inkind contributions. Matching funds
must be spent on eligible expenses and
must be from eligible sources.
C. Other Eligibility Requirements
Indirect Cost Eligibility: Public Law
109–97, Sec. 708 states ‘‘No funds
appropriated by this Act may be used to
pay negotiated indirect cost rates on
cooperative agreements or similar
arrangements between the United States
Department of Agriculture and
nonprofit institutions in excess of 10
percent of the total direct cost of the
agreement when the purpose of such
cooperative arrangements is to carry out
programs of mutual interest between the
two parties.’’ Indirect costs in excess of
10 percent of the direct cost, therefore,
will be ineligible for funding.
Activity Eligibility: A cooperative
agreement reflects a relationship
between the United States Government
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
43100
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 146 / Monday, July 31, 2006 / Notices
and an eligible recipient where the
principal purpose of the relationship is
the transfer of money, property,
services, or anything of value to the
eligible recipient to carry out the
desired research; and substantial
involvement is anticipated between
USDA Rural Development acting for the
United States Government and the
eligible recipient during the
performance of the research in the
agreement. A cooperative agreement is
not a grant. Therefore, the project
proposed must include a description of
USDA Rural Development’s substantial
participation. USDA Rural Development
may subsequently negotiate its
participation before the cooperative
agreement is executed.
Applicants that propose budgets that
include more than 10 percent of total
project costs that are ineligible for the
program will be ineligible, and the
application will not be considered for
funding. However, if an application
with 10 percent or less of ineligible
costs is selected for funding, all
ineligible costs must be removed from
the project and replaced with eligible
activities or the amount of the award
will be reduced accordingly.
Cooperative Agreement Period
Eligibility: Applications that have a
timeframe of more than 24 months will
be considered ineligible and will not be
considered for funding. Applications
that request funds for a time period
ending after September 30, 2008, will
not be considered for funding.
Completeness Eligibility: Applications
without sufficient information to
determine eligibility will not be
considered for funding. Applications
that are missing any required elements
(in whole or in part) will not be
considered for funding.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
A. Address to Request Application
Package
If you plan to apply using a paper
application, you can obtain the
application package for this funding
opportunity at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
reic.htm. If you do not have access to
the Internet, or if you have difficulty
accessing the forms online, you may
contact the National Office by calling
(202) 690–0368 (TDD: (800) 877–8339
Federal Information Relay Service).
Application forms can be mailed to you.
If you plan to apply electronically, you
must visit https://www.grants.gov and
follow the instructions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jul 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
B. Content and Form of Submission
You may submit your application in
paper or in an electronic format. You
may view the Application Guide at
https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
reic.htm.
If you submit your application in
paper form, you must submit one signed
original of your complete application
along with two additional copies.
If you submit your application
electronically, you must follow the
instructions given at https://
www.grants.gov. Applicants are advised
to visit the site well in advance of the
application deadline if they plan to
apply electronically to insure that they
have obtained the proper authentication
and have sufficient computer resources
to complete the application.
An application must contain all of the
following elements. Any application
that is missing any element or contains
an incomplete element will not be
considered for funding:
1. Form SF–424, ‘‘Application for
Federal Assistance.’’ In order for this
form to be considered complete, it must
contain the legal name of the applicant,
the applicant’s Dun and Bradstreet Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
number, the applicant’s complete
mailing address, the name and
telephone number of a contact person,
the employer identification number
(EIN), the start and end dates of the
project, the Federal funds requested,
other funds that will be used as
matching funds, an answer to the
question, ‘‘Is applicant delinquent on
any Federal debt?’’, the name and
signature of an authorized
representative, the telephone number of
the authorized representative, and the
date the form was signed. Other
information requested on the form may
be applicable, but the above-listed
information is required for an
application to be considered complete.
The DUNS number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Applicants
can receive a DUNS number at no cost
by accessing https://www.dnb.com/us/ or
calling (866) 705–5711.
2. Form SF–424A, ‘‘Budget
Information—Non-Construction
Programs.’’ In order for this form to be
considered complete, the applicant
must fill out Sections A, B, C, and D.
The applicant must include both
Federal and any matching funds to be
included.
3. Form SF–424B, ‘‘Assurances—NonConstruction Programs.’’ In order for
this form to be considered complete, the
form must be signed by an authorized
official and include the title, name of
applicant, and date.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4. Title Page. The title page must
include the title of the project as well as
any other relevant identifying
information. The length should not
exceed one page.
5. Table of Contents. For ease of
locating information, each proposal
must contain a detailed Table of
Contents immediately following the title
page.
6. Executive Summary. A summary of
the proposal, not to exceed one page,
must briefly describe the project,
including goals, tasks to be completed,
and other relevant information that
provides a general overview of the
project. In the event an applicant
submits more than one page for this
element, only the first page submitted
will be considered.
7. Eligibility Discussion. A detailed
discussion, not to exceed four pages,
will describe how the applicant meets
the eligibility requirements. In the event
that more than four pages are submitted,
only the first four pages will be
considered.
i. Applicant Eligibility. The applicant
must first describe how it meets the
definition of an institution of higher
education.
ii. Purpose Eligibility. The applicant
must describe how the project purpose
is eligible for funding. The project
purpose is comprised of two
components. First, the applicant must
describe how the proposed project
consists of activities needed to
determine the national economic impact
of all types of cooperatives. Second, the
applicant must demonstrate that the
combined activities are sufficient to
estimate the national economic impact
of all types of cooperatives.
8. Proposal Narrative. The narrative
must include the following information:
i. Project Title. The title of the
proposed project must be brief, not to
exceed 75 characters, yet describe the
essentials of the project. It should match
the project title submitted on the SF–
424. The project title does not need to
appear on a separate page. It can be
included on the title page and/or on the
information sheet.
ii. Information Sheet. A separate onepage information sheet listing each of
the evaluation criteria referenced in this
funding announcement followed by the
page numbers of all relevant material
contained in the proposal that address
or support each criterion.
iii. Goals of the Project. A clear
statement of the ultimate goals of the
project must be included. There must be
an explanation of how economic benefit
will be measured.
iv. Workplan. The narrative must
contain a description of the project and
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 146 / Monday, July 31, 2006 / Notices
set forth the tasks involved in
reasonable detail. The description
should specify the activity, who will
perform the activity, during what
timeframe the activity will take place,
and the cost of the activity. Please note
that one of the proposal evaluation
criteria evaluates the workplan and
budget. Applicants should only submit
the workplan and budget once, either in
this section or as part of the workplan/
budget evaluation criterion discussion.
v. Proposal Evaluation Criteria. Each
of the proposal evaluation criteria
referenced in this funding
announcement must be addressed,
specifically and individually, in
narrative form.
9. Certification of Judgment.
Applicants must certify that the United
States has not obtained a judgment
against them. No Federal funds shall be
used to pay a judgment obtained by the
United States. It is suggested that
applicants use the following language
for the certification. ‘‘[INSERT NAME
OF APPLICANT] certifies that the
United States has not obtained a
judgment against it.’’ A separate
signature is not required.
10. Verification of Matching Funds.
Applicants must provide a budget to
support the workplan showing all
sources and uses of funds during the
project period. Applicants will be
required to verify any and all matching
funds, both cash and in-kind. All
proposed matching funds must be
specifically documented in the
application. If the matching funds are to
be provided by an in-kind contribution
from the applicant, the application must
include a signed letter from an
authorized representative of the
applicant verifying the goods or services
to be donated, when the goods and
services will be donated, and the value
of the goods or services. Applicants
should note that only goods or services
for which no expenditure is made can
be considered in-kind. If the applicant
is paying for goods and services as part
of the matching funds contribution, the
expenditure is considered a cash match,
and should be verified as such. If the
matching funds are to be provided by a
third party in cash, the application must
include a signed letter from that third
party verifying how much cash will be
donated and when it will be donated.
Verification for funds donated outside
the proposed time period of the
cooperative agreement will not be
accepted. If the matching funds are to be
provided by a third party in-kind
donation, the application must include
a signed letter from the third party
verifying the goods or services to be
donated, when the goods and services
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jul 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
will be donated, and the value of the
goods or services. Verification for inkind contributions donated outside the
proposed time period of the cooperative
agreement will not be accepted.
Verification for in-kind contributions
that are over-valued will not be
accepted. The valuation process for the
in-kind funds does not need to be
included in the application, especially if
it is lengthy, but the applicant must be
able to demonstrate how the valuation
was achieved at the time of notification
of tentative selection for the award. If
the applicant cannot satisfactorily
demonstrate how the valuation was
determined, the award may not be
made.
If matching funds are in cash, they
must be spent on goods and services
that are eligible expenditures for this
cooperative agreement program. If
matching funds are in-kind
contributions, the donated goods or
services must be considered eligible
expenditures for this program. The
matching funds must be spent or
donated during the agreement period.
Some examples of acceptable uses for
matching funds are: labor performing
work required for the proposed project,
office supplies, and travel expenses.
Some examples of unacceptable uses of
matching funds are: land, fixed
equipment, buildings, vehicles, political
activities, costs of preparing the
application, and costs incurred prior to
the effective date of the cooperative
agreement. (See 7 CFR parts 3015 and
3019 for funds use eligibility rules.)
If acceptable verification for all
proposed matching funds is missing
from the application by the application
deadline, the application will receive
zero points for the Funding Match part
of the evaluation criteria.
C. Submission Dates and Times
Application Deadline Date: August
30, 2006.
Explanation of Deadlines: Paper
applications must be postmarked by the
deadline date (see Section IV.F. for the
address). Final electronic applications
must be received by https://
www.grants.gov by the deadline date. If
your application does not meet the
deadline above, it will not be
considered for funding. You will be
notified whether or not your application
was received on time.
D. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications
Executive Order (EO) 12372,
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs, does not apply to this
program.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43101
E. Funding Restrictions
Funding restrictions apply to both
Federal funds and matching funds.
Funds may only be used for activities
related to determining the economic
impact of cooperatives.
No funds made available under this
solicitation shall be used to:
1. Plan, repair, rehabilitate, acquire, or
construct a building or facility,
including a processing facility;
2. Purchase, rent, or install fixed
equipment, including processing
equipment;
3. Purchase vehicles, including boats;
4. Pay for the preparation of the
cooperative agreement application;
5. Pay expenses not directly related to
the funded project;
6. Fund political or lobbying
activities;
7. Fund any activities prohibited by 7
CFR parts 3015 or 3019;
8. Fund architectural or engineering
design work for a specific physical
facility;
9. Purchase land;
10. Duplicate current services or
replace or substitute support previously
provided;
11. Pay costs of the project incurred
prior to the date of agreement approval;
12. Pay for assistance to any private
business enterprise which does not have
at least 51 percent ownership by those
who are either citizens of the United
States or reside in the United States
after being legally admitted for
permanent residence; or
13. Pay any judgment or debt owed to
the United States.
F. Other Submission Requirements
You may submit your paper
application for a cooperative agreement
to USDA Rural Development’s
Cooperative Programs, Attn:
Cooperative Research, Mail STOP 3250,
Room 4016-South, 1400 Independence
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20250–3250.
The phone number that should be used
for FedEx packages is (202) 720–7558.
You may also choose to submit your
application electronically at https://
www.grants.gov. Final applications may
not be submitted by electronic mail,
facsimile, or by hand-delivery. Each
application submission must contain all
required documents in one envelope, if
by mail or express delivery service.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
All eligible and complete applications
will be evaluated based on the following
criteria and maximum point allowances.
Failure to address any one of the
following criteria by the application
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
43102
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 146 / Monday, July 31, 2006 / Notices
deadline will result in a determination
of incomplete and the application will
not be considered for funding. The total
points available for the set of criteria are
100.
1. Relevance of the project proposal
(30 points). Proposals will be evaluated
on how directly they address the stated
objective of demonstrating economic
impact of all types of cooperatives in the
United States. Factors to be weighed by
evaluators in scoring a proposal’s
relevance will include:
• Definition of clear and objective
measures of impact;
• Definition of specific measurement
strategies for obtaining impact measures
from each major cooperative sector and
each category of persons impacted by
cooperatives;
• Description of sound data collection
and analysis methodology; and
2. Quality of Workplan (30 points).
The quality evaluations will be based on
whether the proposal outlines a sound
plan of work that will meet the
objectives in a timely and cost-efficient
manner. Factors to be weighed by
evaluators in scoring a proposal’s
workplan will include:
• How well the steps for carrying out
the work are defined;
• The logic of the sequence of
proposed steps and the likelihood they
will achieve their intended result;
• The establishment of clear
benchmarks and timetables to measure
progress of the project;
• The detail, accuracy, and
reasonableness of the project’s proposed
budget; and
3. Quality of personnel and
management plan (20 points). The
quality of the management plan and the
personnel involved in carrying out the
proposed project will be evaluated in
terms of the capabilities of individuals
and institutions to carry out assigned
roles in an effective manner. Factors to
be weighed by evaluators in scoring a
proposal’s personnel and management
plan will include:
• Experience of project leaders and
the lead institution in managing
complex research projects;
• Clear understanding of business
models and general economic
development
• Evidence of management controls,
progress measurements, and reporting
systems within a structured project
management plan; and
• Experience and relevant skills of
researchers, consultants, and
subcontractors assigned to carry out
specific roles in the project.
4. Funding match and cooperative
community support (20 points). Points
will be awarded on the basis of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jul 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
percentage match provided by the
applicant and the level of support for
the proposal from the cooperative
community as evidenced by
contribution of resources to the match
and other indications of support.
• Up to 20 points will be awarded for
matching funds provided by or arranged
for by the applicant. Two points will be
awarded for each 5 percent match, up to
a maximum of 20 points for a 50 percent
match.
B. Review and Selection Process
Each application will be initially
reviewed by Rural Development
personnel for eligibility and to
determine whether all required
elements are complete. A list of required
elements follows:
• SF–424.
• SF–424A.
• SF–424B.
• Title Page.
• Table of Contents.
• Executive Summary.
• Applicant Eligibility Discussion.
• Purpose Eligibility Discussion.
• Project Title.
• Information Sheet.
• Goals of the Project.
• Work Plan.
• Proposal Evaluation Criterion 1.
• Proposal Evaluation Criterion 2.
• Proposal Evaluation Criterion 3.
• Proposal Evaluation Criterion 4.
• Certification of Judgment.
• Verification of any Matching Funds.
Any incomplete or ineligible
applications will not be further
evaluated or considered for funding.
All eligible and complete proposals
will be evaluated by a team of at least
three reviewers based on criteria 1
through 4 described in paragraph A of
this section. Reviewers will represent
the Rural Development broad mission
area, and will include at least three
employees of USDA.
Once the scores for criteria 1 through
4 have been independently completed
by the three reviewers, the scores will
be used to rank the proposals. If the
three reviewers rank the best proposal
differently then, with the aid of a
facilitator, the three reviewers will
develop a consensus ranking. If the
three reviewers cannot reach a
consensus, two additional reviewers
will review the proposals and be added
to the rankings. A final ranking will be
obtained based on the consensus
rankings of the three member review
panel, or the average of the five
reviewers’ rankings. Final award
recommendation will be sent to the
Under Secretary for Rural Development
for final selection concurence.
After the award selection is made, all
applicants will be notified of the status
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of their applications by mail. The
awardee must meet all statutory and
regulatory program requirements in
order to receive their award. In the
event that an awardee cannot meet the
requirements, the award will be
withdrawn.
C. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
Award Date: The announcement of
award selection is expected to occur on
or about September 15, 2006.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
The successful applicant will receive
a notification of tentative selection for
funding from USDA Rural Development.
The applicant must sign a mutually
agreed to cooperative agreement and
comply with all applicable statutes,
regulations, and this notice before the
award will receive final approval.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification, including mediation
procedures and appeal rights, by mail.
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
This award is subject to 7 CFR parts
3015 and 3019. These regulations may
be accessed at https://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-tablesearch.html#page1.
The following additional
documentation requirements apply to
the awardee selected for this program:
• Cooperative Agreement
• Form RD 1940–1, ‘‘Request for
Obligation of Funds’’
• Form AD–1047, ‘‘Certification
Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and
Other Responsibility Matters-Primary
Covered Transactions’’
• Form AD–1048, ‘‘Certification
Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility and Voluntary ExclusionLower Tier Covered Transactions’’
• Form AD–1049, ‘‘Certification
Regarding a Drug-Free Workplace
Requirements (Grants)’’
• Form RD 400–1, ‘‘Equal
Opportunity Agreement’’
• Form RD 400–4, ‘‘Assurance
Agreement’’
Additional information on these
requirements can be found at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
reic.htm.
Reporting Requirements: You must
provide USDA Rural Development with
an original or an electronic copy that
includes all required signatures of the
following reports. The reports should be
submitted to the Agency contact listed
on your Cooperative Agreement. Failure
to submit satisfactory reports on time
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 146 / Monday, July 31, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
may result in suspension or termination
of your award.
1. Form SF–269 or SF–269A. A
‘‘Financial Status Report,’’ listing
expenditures according to agreed upon
budget categories, on a quarterly basis.
Reporting periods end each December
31, March 31, June 30, and September
30. Reports are due 30 days after the
reporting period ends.
2. Quarterly performance reports that
compare accomplishments to the
objectives stated in the proposal.
Identify all tasks completed to date and
provide documentation supporting the
reported results. If the original schedule
provided in the workplan is not being
met, the report should discuss the
problems or delays that may affect
completion of the project. Objectives for
the next reporting period should be
listed. Compliance with any special
condition on the use of award funds
should be discussed. Reporting periods
end each December 31, March 31, June
30, and September 30. Reports are due
30 days after the reporting period ends.
Supporting documentation must also be
submitted for completed tasks. The
supporting documentation for
completed tasks include, but are not
limited to, questionnaire or interview
guides, publications of research
findings, summaries of data collected,
and any other documentation related to
how funds were spent.
3. Final Project performance reports
that compare accomplishments to the
objectives stated in the proposal.
Identify all tasks completed and provide
documentation supporting the reported
results. If the original schedule provided
in the workplan was not met, the report
must discuss the problems or delays
that affected completion of the project.
Compliance with any special condition
on the use of award funds should be
discussed. Supporting documentation
for completed tasks must also be
submitted. The supporting
documentation for completed tasks
include, but are not limited to,
publications of research findings,
summaries of data collected,
documentation of data and software
delivered to USDA Rural Development,
and any other documentation related to
how funds were spent. The final
performance report is due within 90
days of the completion of the project.
VII. Agency Contacts
For general questions about this
announcement and for program
technical assistance, please contact the
USDA Rural Development’s Cooperative
Programs, Mail STOP 3250, Room 4016South, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250–3250,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jul 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
Telephone: (202) 690–0368 (TDD: (800)
877–8339 Federal Information Relay
Service), e-mail:
cpgrants@wdc.usda.gov.
VIII. Non-Discrimination Statement
USDA prohibits discrimination in all
its programs and activities on the basis
of race, color, national origin, age,
disability, and where applicable, sex,
marital status, familial status, parental
status, religion, sexual orientation,
genetic information, political beliefs,
reprisal, or because all or part of an
individual’s income is derived from any
public assistance program. (Not all
prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication of
program information (Braille, large
print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–
2600 (voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to
USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights,
1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.,
Washington, DC. 20250–9410, or call
(800) 795–3272 (voice), or (202) 720–
6382 (TDD). ‘‘USDA is an equal
opportunity provider, employer, and
lender.’’
Dated: July 25, 2006.
Jackie J. Gleason,
Acting Administrator, Rural BusinessCooperative Service.
[FR Doc. E6–12166 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD
INVESTIGATION BOARD
Proposed Information Collection
Activity: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Chemical Safety and Hazard
Investigation Board.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Chemical Safety and
Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) is
announcing an opportunity for public
comment on the proposed collection of
certain information by the agency.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, Federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, and allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
information needed to determine the
effectiveness and usability of our
written investigation products.
DATES: Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed
collection of information must be
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43103
received by the CSB on or before
September 29, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed collection of
information by any of the following
methods:
• E-mail: anna.johnson@csb.gov.
• Mail/courier/hand-delivery: U.S.
Chemical Safety and Hazard
Investigation Board, Attn: Anna M.
Johnson, 2175 K Street, NW., Suite 400,
Washington, DC 20037.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the proposed information
collection should be directed to Anna
M. Johnson at (202) 261–7639 or FAX
(202) 974–7639. Upon written request,
you may obtain a copy of the proposed
information collection at no charge.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521, Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
This request for comment is being made
pursuant to sec. 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
PRA.
With respect to the following
collection of information, CSB invites
comments on: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of CSB’s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of CSB’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (3) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
the use of other forms of information
technology.
Title: Chemical Safety Board
Questionnaire.
OMB Control Number: Not yet
assigned.
Type of Review: New collection of
information.
Abstract: CSB online questionnaire
will be used to collect feedback from
readers of CSB investigation products.
The general purpose of this voluntary
collection of information is to obtain
input on the quality and use of these
products from readers.
Affected Public: Businesses, state,
local, or tribal government, federal
government, not for profit institutions,
and for profit institutions.
Estimated number of respondents:
3500.
Estimated time per response: 10
minutes.
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 146 (Monday, July 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43098-43103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12166]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
Request for Proposals: Fiscal Year 2006 Funding Opportunity for
Research on the Economic Impact of Cooperatives
AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA.
ACTION: Initial Notice of Request for Proposals.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Rural Business-Cooperative Service programs are administered
through USDA Rural Development. USDA Rural Development announces the
availability of approximately $495,000 in competitive cooperative
agreement funds for fiscal year (FY) 2006 to conduct research on the
national economic impact of all types of cooperatives. USDA Rural
Development hereby requests proposals from institutions of higher
education interested in applying for a competitively awarded
cooperative research agreement. The intent of the funding is to
encourage research on the critical issue of the economic value of
cooperatives.
DATES: Interested parties may submit completed applications for the
cooperative agreement on paper or electronically according to the
following deadlines:
Paper copies must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or sent
overnight no later than August 30, 2006, to be eligible for FY 2006
funding. Electronic copies must be received by August 30, 2006, to be
eligible for FY 2006 funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY
2006 funding.
ADDRESSES: Applicants may obtain application forms, guides, and
materials for the cooperative agreement at https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/
rbs/coops/reic.htm or by contacting USDA Rural Development at (202)
690-0368, (TDD: (800) 877-8339, Federal Information Relay Service) and
ask for the cooperative research agreement application kit.
Submit completed paper applications for a cooperative agreement to
USDA Rural Development's Cooperative Programs, Attn: Cooperative
Research, Mail STOP 3250, Room 4016--South, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20250-3250. The phone number that should be used
for FedEx packages is (202) 720-7558.
Submit electronic applications at https://www.grants.gov, following
the instructions found on this Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Visit the program Web site at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/reic.htm, which contains application
guidance, including an Application Guide and application forms. Or you
may contact USDA Rural Development at (202) 690-0368 (TDD: (800) 877-
8339 Federal Information Relay Service).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., OMB must
approve all ``collections of information'' by USDA Rural Development.
The Act defines ``collection of information'' as a requirement for
``answers to * * * identical reporting or recordkeeping requirements
imposed on ten or more persons * * *.'' (44 U.S.C. 3502(3)(A)) Because
the RFP will receive less than 10 respondents, the Paperwork Reduction
Act does not apply.
Overview
Federal Agency: Rural Business-Cooperative Service.
Funding Opportunity Title: Research on the Economic Impact of
Cooperatives.
Announcement Type: Initial announcement.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 10.778.
Dates: You may submit completed applications for the cooperative
[[Page 43099]]
agreement on paper or electronically according to the following
deadlines:
Paper copies must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or sent
overnight no later than August 30, 2006, to be eligible for FY 2006
funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY 2006 funding.
Electronic copies must be received by August 30, 2006, to be
eligible for FY 2006 funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY
2006 funding.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13): There is no
public reporting burden associated with this notice.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
This solicitation is issued pursuant to the Agriculture, Rural
Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 2006 (Pub. L. 109-97 ), as amended by the
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006 (Pub. L. 109-148)
directing funds ``for a cooperative research agreement with a qualified
academic institution to conduct research on the national economic
impact of all types of cooperatives.'' The Secretary of Agriculture has
delegated the program's administration to USDA Rural Development.
The primary objective of this cooperative research agreement
program is to facilitate university research on the national economic
impact of cooperatives. The research program will need to develop a
methodology for collecting and assembling basic impact data on a
periodic basis; apply the methodology to collect data and estimate
economic impact of cooperatives; estimate cooperative specific
community impact multipliers; and conduct other appropriate studies to
examine the cumulative economic impact of cooperatives on their local
communities.
The cooperative agreement proposal must address the following
deliverables:
1. Development of a methodology for collection and assembly of
basic impact data on a periodic basis. This methodology will need to
account for cooperative organizational complexity, such as a single
organization's several local, regional, and national locations, as well
as sector differences.
2. Application of the developed methodology, by major sector, to
collect data and estimate economic impact of cooperatives. Data items
to be collected/measured must include:
Number and location of cooperatives,
Volume measures appropriate for each sector (revenues,
dollar value, and other appropriate size indicators),
Number of persons impacted by the cooperative (members,
patrons, or investors), and
Number of full-time equivalent jobs and other economic
impact variables.
Sectors for which summary data should be prepared include:
Housing,
Health care,
Daycare/elder care,
Financial services,
Grocery/consumer retail,
Business-to-business (wholesaling, manufacturing),
Agricultural marketing (including organic and
conventional),
Agricultural supplies and services,
Public services (including transportation and education),
Biofuels, and
Utilities.
3. Creation and population of a database for individual cooperative
and summary data collected. Database is to be delivered to USDA Rural
Development.
4. Estimation of cooperative specific community impact multipliers
for each of the following four categories or classes of cooperatives:
i. Commercial sales or marketing--includes farm supply and
marketing, grocery and consumer goods, business-to-business, emerging
ethanol and biofuels related industry, and manufacturing.
ii. Social and public services--includes housing, health care, day
care/ elder care, transportation, and educational services.
iii. Financial services--includes credit unions, banks, and mutual
insurance.
iv. Utilities--includes electric, telephone, water, waste, and
other regulated utilities.
5. Performance of subcontracting services, oversight, and financial
controls for the overall project.
6. Submission of quarterly progress reports and quarterly financial
reports to USDA Rural Development.
7. Preparation and submission of publishable quality written
reports for Deliverables 2 and 4 to USDA Rural Development.
USDA Rural Development will competitively award one cooperative
agreement to fund the collection and analysis of data to determine the
national economic impact of cooperatives. An institution of higher
education may subcontract or collaborate with others on the research
and data collection. A formal consortium of academic institutions is
allowed.
Definitions
The definitions at 7 CFR 3019.2 are incorporated by reference.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2006.
Approximate Total Funding: $495,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award: $495,000.
Floor of Award Range: None.
Ceiling of Award Range: $495,000.
Anticipated Award Date: September 15, 2006.
Budget Period Length: 24 months.
Project Period Length: 24 months.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
Applicants must be institutions of higher education. Proposals may
be submitted by public or private colleges or universities, research
foundations maintained by a college or university, or private nonprofit
organizations funded by a group of colleges or universities. Under the
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, an organization described in section
501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(4))
which engages in lobbying activities, is not eligible to apply.
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
Matching funds are not required but are highly encouraged.
Applicants must verify in their applications that matching funds are
available for the time period of the agreement if the matching funds
are required to complete the project. Matching funds must be provided
by either the applicant or by a third party in the form of cash or in-
kind contributions. Matching funds must be spent on eligible expenses
and must be from eligible sources.
C. Other Eligibility Requirements
Indirect Cost Eligibility: Public Law 109-97, Sec. 708 states ``No
funds appropriated by this Act may be used to pay negotiated indirect
cost rates on cooperative agreements or similar arrangements between
the United States Department of Agriculture and nonprofit institutions
in excess of 10 percent of the total direct cost of the agreement when
the purpose of such cooperative arrangements is to carry out programs
of mutual interest between the two parties.'' Indirect costs in excess
of 10 percent of the direct cost, therefore, will be ineligible for
funding.
Activity Eligibility: A cooperative agreement reflects a
relationship between the United States Government
[[Page 43100]]
and an eligible recipient where the principal purpose of the
relationship is the transfer of money, property, services, or anything
of value to the eligible recipient to carry out the desired research;
and substantial involvement is anticipated between USDA Rural
Development acting for the United States Government and the eligible
recipient during the performance of the research in the agreement. A
cooperative agreement is not a grant. Therefore, the project proposed
must include a description of USDA Rural Development's substantial
participation. USDA Rural Development may subsequently negotiate its
participation before the cooperative agreement is executed.
Applicants that propose budgets that include more than 10 percent
of total project costs that are ineligible for the program will be
ineligible, and the application will not be considered for funding.
However, if an application with 10 percent or less of ineligible costs
is selected for funding, all ineligible costs must be removed from the
project and replaced with eligible activities or the amount of the
award will be reduced accordingly.
Cooperative Agreement Period Eligibility: Applications that have a
timeframe of more than 24 months will be considered ineligible and will
not be considered for funding. Applications that request funds for a
time period ending after September 30, 2008, will not be considered for
funding.
Completeness Eligibility: Applications without sufficient
information to determine eligibility will not be considered for
funding. Applications that are missing any required elements (in whole
or in part) will not be considered for funding.
IV. Application and Submission Information
A. Address to Request Application Package
If you plan to apply using a paper application, you can obtain the
application package for this funding opportunity at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/reic.htm. If you do not have access to
the Internet, or if you have difficulty accessing the forms online, you
may contact the National Office by calling (202) 690-0368 (TDD: (800)
877-8339 Federal Information Relay Service). Application forms can be
mailed to you. If you plan to apply electronically, you must visit
https://www.grants.gov and follow the instructions.
B. Content and Form of Submission
You may submit your application in paper or in an electronic
format. You may view the Application Guide at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/reic.htm.
If you submit your application in paper form, you must submit one
signed original of your complete application along with two additional
copies.
If you submit your application electronically, you must follow the
instructions given at https://www.grants.gov. Applicants are advised to
visit the site well in advance of the application deadline if they plan
to apply electronically to insure that they have obtained the proper
authentication and have sufficient computer resources to complete the
application.
An application must contain all of the following elements. Any
application that is missing any element or contains an incomplete
element will not be considered for funding:
1. Form SF-424, ``Application for Federal Assistance.'' In order
for this form to be considered complete, it must contain the legal name
of the applicant, the applicant's Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number, the applicant's complete mailing
address, the name and telephone number of a contact person, the
employer identification number (EIN), the start and end dates of the
project, the Federal funds requested, other funds that will be used as
matching funds, an answer to the question, ``Is applicant delinquent on
any Federal debt?'', the name and signature of an authorized
representative, the telephone number of the authorized representative,
and the date the form was signed. Other information requested on the
form may be applicable, but the above-listed information is required
for an application to be considered complete.
The DUNS number is a nine-digit identification number, which
uniquely identifies business entities. Applicants can receive a DUNS
number at no cost by accessing https://www.dnb.com/us/ or calling (866)
705-5711.
2. Form SF-424A, ``Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs.''
In order for this form to be considered complete, the applicant must
fill out Sections A, B, C, and D. The applicant must include both
Federal and any matching funds to be included.
3. Form SF-424B, ``Assurances--Non-Construction Programs.'' In
order for this form to be considered complete, the form must be signed
by an authorized official and include the title, name of applicant, and
date.
4. Title Page. The title page must include the title of the project
as well as any other relevant identifying information. The length
should not exceed one page.
5. Table of Contents. For ease of locating information, each
proposal must contain a detailed Table of Contents immediately
following the title page.
6. Executive Summary. A summary of the proposal, not to exceed one
page, must briefly describe the project, including goals, tasks to be
completed, and other relevant information that provides a general
overview of the project. In the event an applicant submits more than
one page for this element, only the first page submitted will be
considered.
7. Eligibility Discussion. A detailed discussion, not to exceed
four pages, will describe how the applicant meets the eligibility
requirements. In the event that more than four pages are submitted,
only the first four pages will be considered.
i. Applicant Eligibility. The applicant must first describe how it
meets the definition of an institution of higher education.
ii. Purpose Eligibility. The applicant must describe how the
project purpose is eligible for funding. The project purpose is
comprised of two components. First, the applicant must describe how the
proposed project consists of activities needed to determine the
national economic impact of all types of cooperatives. Second, the
applicant must demonstrate that the combined activities are sufficient
to estimate the national economic impact of all types of cooperatives.
8. Proposal Narrative. The narrative must include the following
information:
i. Project Title. The title of the proposed project must be brief,
not to exceed 75 characters, yet describe the essentials of the
project. It should match the project title submitted on the SF-424. The
project title does not need to appear on a separate page. It can be
included on the title page and/or on the information sheet.
ii. Information Sheet. A separate one-page information sheet
listing each of the evaluation criteria referenced in this funding
announcement followed by the page numbers of all relevant material
contained in the proposal that address or support each criterion.
iii. Goals of the Project. A clear statement of the ultimate goals
of the project must be included. There must be an explanation of how
economic benefit will be measured.
iv. Workplan. The narrative must contain a description of the
project and
[[Page 43101]]
set forth the tasks involved in reasonable detail. The description
should specify the activity, who will perform the activity, during what
timeframe the activity will take place, and the cost of the activity.
Please note that one of the proposal evaluation criteria evaluates the
workplan and budget. Applicants should only submit the workplan and
budget once, either in this section or as part of the workplan/budget
evaluation criterion discussion.
v. Proposal Evaluation Criteria. Each of the proposal evaluation
criteria referenced in this funding announcement must be addressed,
specifically and individually, in narrative form.
9. Certification of Judgment. Applicants must certify that the
United States has not obtained a judgment against them. No Federal
funds shall be used to pay a judgment obtained by the United States. It
is suggested that applicants use the following language for the
certification. ``[INSERT NAME OF APPLICANT] certifies that the United
States has not obtained a judgment against it.'' A separate signature
is not required.
10. Verification of Matching Funds. Applicants must provide a
budget to support the workplan showing all sources and uses of funds
during the project period. Applicants will be required to verify any
and all matching funds, both cash and in-kind. All proposed matching
funds must be specifically documented in the application. If the
matching funds are to be provided by an in-kind contribution from the
applicant, the application must include a signed letter from an
authorized representative of the applicant verifying the goods or
services to be donated, when the goods and services will be donated,
and the value of the goods or services. Applicants should note that
only goods or services for which no expenditure is made can be
considered in-kind. If the applicant is paying for goods and services
as part of the matching funds contribution, the expenditure is
considered a cash match, and should be verified as such. If the
matching funds are to be provided by a third party in cash, the
application must include a signed letter from that third party
verifying how much cash will be donated and when it will be donated.
Verification for funds donated outside the proposed time period of the
cooperative agreement will not be accepted. If the matching funds are
to be provided by a third party in-kind donation, the application must
include a signed letter from the third party verifying the goods or
services to be donated, when the goods and services will be donated,
and the value of the goods or services. Verification for in-kind
contributions donated outside the proposed time period of the
cooperative agreement will not be accepted. Verification for in-kind
contributions that are over-valued will not be accepted. The valuation
process for the in-kind funds does not need to be included in the
application, especially if it is lengthy, but the applicant must be
able to demonstrate how the valuation was achieved at the time of
notification of tentative selection for the award. If the applicant
cannot satisfactorily demonstrate how the valuation was determined, the
award may not be made.
If matching funds are in cash, they must be spent on goods and
services that are eligible expenditures for this cooperative agreement
program. If matching funds are in-kind contributions, the donated goods
or services must be considered eligible expenditures for this program.
The matching funds must be spent or donated during the agreement
period. Some examples of acceptable uses for matching funds are: labor
performing work required for the proposed project, office supplies, and
travel expenses. Some examples of unacceptable uses of matching funds
are: land, fixed equipment, buildings, vehicles, political activities,
costs of preparing the application, and costs incurred prior to the
effective date of the cooperative agreement. (See 7 CFR parts 3015 and
3019 for funds use eligibility rules.)
If acceptable verification for all proposed matching funds is
missing from the application by the application deadline, the
application will receive zero points for the Funding Match part of the
evaluation criteria.
C. Submission Dates and Times
Application Deadline Date: August 30, 2006.
Explanation of Deadlines: Paper applications must be postmarked by
the deadline date (see Section IV.F. for the address). Final electronic
applications must be received by https://www.grants.gov by the deadline
date. If your application does not meet the deadline above, it will not
be considered for funding. You will be notified whether or not your
application was received on time.
D. Intergovernmental Review of Applications
Executive Order (EO) 12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs, does not apply to this program.
E. Funding Restrictions
Funding restrictions apply to both Federal funds and matching
funds. Funds may only be used for activities related to determining the
economic impact of cooperatives.
No funds made available under this solicitation shall be used to:
1. Plan, repair, rehabilitate, acquire, or construct a building or
facility, including a processing facility;
2. Purchase, rent, or install fixed equipment, including processing
equipment;
3. Purchase vehicles, including boats;
4. Pay for the preparation of the cooperative agreement
application;
5. Pay expenses not directly related to the funded project;
6. Fund political or lobbying activities;
7. Fund any activities prohibited by 7 CFR parts 3015 or 3019;
8. Fund architectural or engineering design work for a specific
physical facility;
9. Purchase land;
10. Duplicate current services or replace or substitute support
previously provided;
11. Pay costs of the project incurred prior to the date of
agreement approval;
12. Pay for assistance to any private business enterprise which
does not have at least 51 percent ownership by those who are either
citizens of the United States or reside in the United States after
being legally admitted for permanent residence; or
13. Pay any judgment or debt owed to the United States.
F. Other Submission Requirements
You may submit your paper application for a cooperative agreement
to USDA Rural Development's Cooperative Programs, Attn: Cooperative
Research, Mail STOP 3250, Room 4016-South, 1400 Independence Ave. SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-3250. The phone number that should be used for
FedEx packages is (202) 720-7558. You may also choose to submit your
application electronically at https://www.grants.gov. Final applications
may not be submitted by electronic mail, facsimile, or by hand-
delivery. Each application submission must contain all required
documents in one envelope, if by mail or express delivery service.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
All eligible and complete applications will be evaluated based on
the following criteria and maximum point allowances. Failure to address
any one of the following criteria by the application
[[Page 43102]]
deadline will result in a determination of incomplete and the
application will not be considered for funding. The total points
available for the set of criteria are 100.
1. Relevance of the project proposal (30 points). Proposals will be
evaluated on how directly they address the stated objective of
demonstrating economic impact of all types of cooperatives in the
United States. Factors to be weighed by evaluators in scoring a
proposal's relevance will include:
Definition of clear and objective measures of impact;
Definition of specific measurement strategies for
obtaining impact measures from each major cooperative sector and each
category of persons impacted by cooperatives;
Description of sound data collection and analysis
methodology; and
2. Quality of Workplan (30 points). The quality evaluations will be
based on whether the proposal outlines a sound plan of work that will
meet the objectives in a timely and cost-efficient manner. Factors to
be weighed by evaluators in scoring a proposal's workplan will include:
How well the steps for carrying out the work are defined;
The logic of the sequence of proposed steps and the
likelihood they will achieve their intended result;
The establishment of clear benchmarks and timetables to
measure progress of the project;
The detail, accuracy, and reasonableness of the project's
proposed budget; and
3. Quality of personnel and management plan (20 points). The
quality of the management plan and the personnel involved in carrying
out the proposed project will be evaluated in terms of the capabilities
of individuals and institutions to carry out assigned roles in an
effective manner. Factors to be weighed by evaluators in scoring a
proposal's personnel and management plan will include:
Experience of project leaders and the lead institution in
managing complex research projects;
Clear understanding of business models and general
economic development
Evidence of management controls, progress measurements,
and reporting systems within a structured project management plan; and
Experience and relevant skills of researchers,
consultants, and subcontractors assigned to carry out specific roles in
the project.
4. Funding match and cooperative community support (20 points).
Points will be awarded on the basis of the percentage match provided by
the applicant and the level of support for the proposal from the
cooperative community as evidenced by contribution of resources to the
match and other indications of support.
Up to 20 points will be awarded for matching funds
provided by or arranged for by the applicant. Two points will be
awarded for each 5 percent match, up to a maximum of 20 points for a 50
percent match.
B. Review and Selection Process
Each application will be initially reviewed by Rural Development
personnel for eligibility and to determine whether all required
elements are complete. A list of required elements follows:
SF-424.
SF-424A.
SF-424B.
Title Page.
Table of Contents.
Executive Summary.
Applicant Eligibility Discussion.
Purpose Eligibility Discussion.
Project Title.
Information Sheet.
Goals of the Project.
Work Plan.
Proposal Evaluation Criterion 1.
Proposal Evaluation Criterion 2.
Proposal Evaluation Criterion 3.
Proposal Evaluation Criterion 4.
Certification of Judgment.
Verification of any Matching Funds.
Any incomplete or ineligible applications will not be further
evaluated or considered for funding.
All eligible and complete proposals will be evaluated by a team of
at least three reviewers based on criteria 1 through 4 described in
paragraph A of this section. Reviewers will represent the Rural
Development broad mission area, and will include at least three
employees of USDA.
Once the scores for criteria 1 through 4 have been independently
completed by the three reviewers, the scores will be used to rank the
proposals. If the three reviewers rank the best proposal differently
then, with the aid of a facilitator, the three reviewers will develop a
consensus ranking. If the three reviewers cannot reach a consensus, two
additional reviewers will review the proposals and be added to the
rankings. A final ranking will be obtained based on the consensus
rankings of the three member review panel, or the average of the five
reviewers' rankings. Final award recommendation will be sent to the
Under Secretary for Rural Development for final selection concurence.
After the award selection is made, all applicants will be notified
of the status of their applications by mail. The awardee must meet all
statutory and regulatory program requirements in order to receive their
award. In the event that an awardee cannot meet the requirements, the
award will be withdrawn.
C. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
Award Date: The announcement of award selection is expected to
occur on or about September 15, 2006.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
The successful applicant will receive a notification of tentative
selection for funding from USDA Rural Development. The applicant must
sign a mutually agreed to cooperative agreement and comply with all
applicable statutes, regulations, and this notice before the award will
receive final approval.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification, including
mediation procedures and appeal rights, by mail.
B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
This award is subject to 7 CFR parts 3015 and 3019. These
regulations may be accessed at https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-
table-search.html#page1.
The following additional documentation requirements apply to the
awardee selected for this program:
Cooperative Agreement
Form RD 1940-1, ``Request for Obligation of Funds''
Form AD-1047, ``Certification Regarding Debarment,
Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Covered
Transactions''
Form AD-1048, ``Certification Regarding Debarment,
Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered
Transactions''
Form AD-1049, ``Certification Regarding a Drug-Free
Workplace Requirements (Grants)''
Form RD 400-1, ``Equal Opportunity Agreement''
Form RD 400-4, ``Assurance Agreement''
Additional information on these requirements can be found at http:/
/www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/reic.htm.
Reporting Requirements: You must provide USDA Rural Development
with an original or an electronic copy that includes all required
signatures of the following reports. The reports should be submitted to
the Agency contact listed on your Cooperative Agreement. Failure to
submit satisfactory reports on time
[[Page 43103]]
may result in suspension or termination of your award.
1. Form SF-269 or SF-269A. A ``Financial Status Report,'' listing
expenditures according to agreed upon budget categories, on a quarterly
basis. Reporting periods end each December 31, March 31, June 30, and
September 30. Reports are due 30 days after the reporting period ends.
2. Quarterly performance reports that compare accomplishments to
the objectives stated in the proposal. Identify all tasks completed to
date and provide documentation supporting the reported results. If the
original schedule provided in the workplan is not being met, the report
should discuss the problems or delays that may affect completion of the
project. Objectives for the next reporting period should be listed.
Compliance with any special condition on the use of award funds should
be discussed. Reporting periods end each December 31, March 31, June
30, and September 30. Reports are due 30 days after the reporting
period ends. Supporting documentation must also be submitted for
completed tasks. The supporting documentation for completed tasks
include, but are not limited to, questionnaire or interview guides,
publications of research findings, summaries of data collected, and any
other documentation related to how funds were spent.
3. Final Project performance reports that compare accomplishments
to the objectives stated in the proposal. Identify all tasks completed
and provide documentation supporting the reported results. If the
original schedule provided in the workplan was not met, the report must
discuss the problems or delays that affected completion of the project.
Compliance with any special condition on the use of award funds should
be discussed. Supporting documentation for completed tasks must also be
submitted. The supporting documentation for completed tasks include,
but are not limited to, publications of research findings, summaries of
data collected, documentation of data and software delivered to USDA
Rural Development, and any other documentation related to how funds
were spent. The final performance report is due within 90 days of the
completion of the project.
VII. Agency Contacts
For general questions about this announcement and for program
technical assistance, please contact the USDA Rural Development's
Cooperative Programs, Mail STOP 3250, Room 4016-South, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-3250, Telephone: (202)
690-0368 (TDD: (800) 877-8339 Federal Information Relay Service), e-
mail: cpgrants@wdc.usda.gov.
VIII. Non-Discrimination Statement
USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on
the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status,
religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs,
reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived
from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to
all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means
for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600
(voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA,
Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.,
Washington, DC. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice), or (202)
720-6382 (TDD). ``USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and
lender.''
Dated: July 25, 2006.
Jackie J. Gleason,
Acting Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative Service.
[FR Doc. E6-12166 Filed 7-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XY-P