Submission of Collection of Water Delivery and Electric Service Data for the Operation of Irrigation and Power Projects and Systems to the Office of Management and Budget, 42874-42875 [E6-12074]
Download as PDF
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
42874
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 145 / Friday, July 28, 2006 / Notices
of Smith Slough to prevent
unacceptable tidal velocities at Pete’s
Harbor Marina. A flow restricter would
be installed in Corkscrew Slough to
prevent increased sedimentation of the
Redwood Creek Shipping Channel.
Approximately 1,400 acres of tidal salt
marsh would be restored more quickly
than would occur under the No-Action
Alternative for the endangered
California clapper rail, salt marsh
harvest mouse, and other native
wildlife.
A wildlife viewing platform with
portage for small boats would be
constructed at the flow restricter in
Corkscrew Slough. A 5-mile-per-hour
speed limit and no-wake zone would be
implemented in Smith and Corkscrew
Slough to protect harbor seals and other
sensitive wildlife. In addition to
waterfowl hunting, Refuge guided trips
would continue to be the only public
access allowed on Outer and Middle
Bair Island. On Inner Bair Island, 1.8
miles of trails on the levee, which
would end at two wildlife platforms
adjacent to Smith Slough, would replace
the 3-mile loop trail. A predatorresistant pedestrian bridge would be
built from the existing parking lot to
Inner Bair Island. The parking lot would
be enlarged to accommodate school
buses, a restroom and an information
kiosk. The Whipple Avenue entrance
would be closed to public access but
maintained for emergency vehicle
access. Pets (dogs only) would be
allowed on the Inner Bair Island trails
on a 6-foot leash. Future dog access to
Bair Island will be determined during a
test period of compliance with Refuge
regulations designed to protect wildlife.
As a result of comments made on the
Draft EIS/EIR, Alternative 1 in the Final
EIS/EIR differs from Alternative 1 in the
Draft EIS/EIR in the following ways: (1)
The public access trail on Inner Bair
Island would be shortened from 2.7
miles to 1.8 miles; (2) a predatorresistent pedestrian bridge would be
added to directly connect the existing
Bair Island Parking Lot to Inner Bair
Island; (3) a 3-foot high berm or one
strand fence would be added, to be
placed between the public access area
and the restored habitat; and (4) the
existing parking lot would be enlarged
to accommodate school buses, a
restroom, and an information kiosk.
Alternative 2, the Tidal Marsh
Restoration with Restricted Public
Access Alternative, would be the same
as the Preferred Alternative (Alternative
1), except for the following: (1) No pets
would be allowed on Inner Bair Island;
(2) there would be a seasonal closure to
boating in Corkscrew Slough to protect
harbor seals; (3) no pedestrian bridge
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:47 Jul 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
would be built from the Refuge parking
lot and the parking lot would not be
enlarged to accommodate school buses
and a restroom; (4) an existing
unimproved trail on the mainland from
the Refuge parking lot to the Whipple
Avenue trailhead would be improved,
and Whipple Avenue would continue to
be used as the primary public access
route to Inner Bair Island; and (5) the
1.8-mile Inner Bair Island Trail would
not extend east of Whipple Avenue, but
would extend further along Smith
Slough on the west side of Whipple
Avenue, ending in one wildlife viewing
platform along Smith Slough.
Approximately 1,400 acres of tidal salt
marsh would be restored more quickly
than would occur under the No-Action
Alternative for the endangered
California clapper rail, endangered salt
marsh harvest mouse, and other native
wildlife.
Alternative 3, the Tidal and Managed
Marsh Restoration with Moderate Public
Access Alternative, would be the same
as Alternative 2 except for the
following: (1) Inner Bair Island would
not be restored to tidal salt marsh; (2)
Pets (dogs only) would be allowed on
the Inner Bair Island trails on a 6-foot
leash for a test period to determine
compliance with Refuge regulations
designed to protect wildlife; and (3)
there would not be a seasonal closure of
Corkscrew Slough to protect harbor
seals. Using water control structures,
managed salt marsh would be created
on Inner Bair Island, a flow restricter
would be built in Smith Slough to
prevent an unacceptable increase in
tidal velocity at Pete’s Harbor Marina,
and the slough would not be restored to
its historic meander. Approximately
1,100 acres of tidal salt marsh would be
restored on Outer and Middle Bair
Island more quickly than would occur
under the No-Action Alternative for the
endangered California clapper rail,
endangered salt marsh harvest mouse,
and other native wildlife. Three
hundred acres of managed salt marsh
would be created on Inner Bair Island
for the endangered salt marsh harvest
mouse but no habitat would be created
for the endangered California clapper
rail.
Alternative 4, the Tidal and Managed
Marsh Restoration with Restricted
Public Access Alternative, would be a
mixture of Alternative’s 2 and 3. The
restoration of 1,100 acres of tidal salt
marsh and 300 acres of managed salt
marsh on Inner Bair Island would be the
same as in Alternative 3. The public
access would be the same as in
Alternative 2.
This notice is provided pursuant to
regulations for implementing the
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (40 CFR 1506.6).
Dated: July 19, 2006.
Alexandra Pitts,
Acting Manager, California/Nevada
Operations Office.
[FR Doc. E6–12016 Filed 7–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Submission of Collection of Water
Delivery and Electric Service Data for
the Operation of Irrigation and Power
Projects and Systems to the Office of
Management and Budget
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act, the Bureau of Indian
Affairs (BIA) is submitting the
information collection titled: Electrical
Service Application, 25 CFR 175, OMB
Control Number 1076–0021, and Water
Request, 25 CFR 171, OMB Central
Number 1076–0141, for reinstatement,
review, and approval. These collections
expired during the Paperwork
Reduction Act renewal process.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
August 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the information collection to the
Desk Officer for the Department of the
Interior at the Office of Management and
Budget, by facsimile at (202) 395–6566
or you may send an e-mail to:
OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov.
Please send a copy of the comments
to John Anevski, Bureau of Indian
Affairs, Branch of Irrigation, Power, and
Safety of Dams, Mail Stop 4655–MIB,
Washington, DC 20240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
may request further information or
obtain copies of the information
collection request submission from John
Anevski at (202) 208–5480, or by
facsimile at (202) 219–0006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments
on these two information collections
were requested in a Federal Register
notice published February 28, 2006 (71
FR 10054). No comments were received.
Request for Comments
The Bureau of Indian Affairs requests
you to send your comments on this
collection to the two locations listed in
the ADDRESSES section. The Bureau of
Indian Affairs solicits comments in
order to:
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 145 / Friday, July 28, 2006 / Notices
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the bureau, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the bureau’s estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond.
OMB has up to 60 days to approve or
disapprove the information collections
but may respond after 30 days;
therefore, comments submitted within
30 days are more assured of receiving
maximum consideration. Please note
that comments, names, addresses of
commentators are available for public
review during normal business hours. If
you wish us to withhold any
information you submit, you must state
this prominently at the beginning of
your comment. We will honor your
request to the extent allowable by law.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Water Request
Type of review: Reinstatement with a
change of a previously approved
collection.
Title: Water Request, 25 CFR 171.
Summary: In order for irrigators to
receive water deliveries, information is
needed by the BIA to operate and
maintain its irrigation projects and
fulfill reporting requirements. Section
171.7 of 25 CFR part 171, [Irrigation]
Operation and Maintenance, specifies
the information collection requirement.
Water users must apply for water
delivery. The information to be
collected includes: Name; water
delivery location; time and date of
requested water delivery; duration of
water delivery; rate of water flow;
number of acres irrigated; crop statistics;
and other operational information
identified in the local administrative
manuals. Collection of this information
was previously authorized under an
approval by OMB (OMB Control
Number 1076–0141). All information is
collected at least annually from each
water user with a response required
each time irrigation water is provided.
Annual reporting and record keeping
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 8 minutes per
request. There is a range of 1 to 10
requests from each irrigation water user
each season with an average of 4
responses per respondent.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:47 Jul 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
Description of Respondents: BIA
Irrigation Project Water Users.
Total Respondents: 6539.
Total Annual Responses: 26,945.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 13,756
hours.
Electrical Service Application
Type of review: Reinstatement of a
previously approved collection.
Title: Electric Service Application, 25
CFR 175.
Summary: In order for electric power
consumers to be served, information is
needed by the BIA to operate and
maintain its electric power utilities and
fulfill reporting requirements. Section
175.22 of 25 CFR part 175, Indian
electric power utilities, specifies the
information collection requirement.
Power consumers must apply for
electric service. The information to be
collected includes: name; electric
service location; and other operational
information identified in the local
administrative manuals. Collection of
this information was authorized under
an approval by OMB (OMB Control
Number 1076–0021). All information is
collected from each electric power
consumer. Annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden for this collection
of information is estimated to average 30
minutes for each response for 3,000
respondents, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information. Thus, the total annual
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection is estimated to be 1,500
hours.
Frequency of Collection: On Occasion.
Description of Respondents: BIA
Electric Power Consumers.
Total Respondents: 3,000.
Total Annual Responses: 3,000.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,500
hours.
Dated: July 20, 2006.
Michael D. Olsen,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs.
[FR Doc. E6–12074 Filed 7–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42875
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[CA–660–1430–ER–CACA–17905]
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR)
for the Southern California Edison
Devers-Palo Verde No. 2 Transmission
Line Project, California
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969, as amended (Pub. L.
91–190, 42 U.S.C. 4321–4347), and 40
CFR parts 1500–1508, the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM), together with
the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC), hereby gives
notice that the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement/Environmental
Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for the
Southern California Edison Company
(SCE) Devers-Palo Verde No. 2
Transmission Line Project is available
for public review and comment. The
BLM is the lead Federal agency for the
preparation of this EIS in compliance
with the requirements of NEPA. The
CPUC is the lead State of California
agency for the preparation of this EIR in
compliance with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). This notice serves as an
invitation for the public and other
cooperating agencies to provide
comments on the scope and content of
the Draft EIS/EIR.
DATES: To assure that they will be
considered, BLM must receive
comments on the Draft EIS/EIR within
60 days following the date of
publication of a Notice of Availability of
this document, in the Federal Register,
by the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA). The EPA published its Notice of
Availability on May 19, 2006, at 71 FR
29148, with a stated end of the comment
period to be July 5, 2006. The BLM is
extending this comment period until the
close of business on August 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment,
you may submit your comments by any
of several methods. You may mail
comments to: Gail Acheson, Field
Manager; Bureau of Land Management,
Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office,
P.O. Box 581260, North Palm Springs,
CA 92258. You may also comment via
the Internet to gchill@ca.blm.gov. Please
include in the subject line: ‘‘Draft EIS/
EIR, DPV2 Transmission Line Project’’
and your name and return address in
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 145 (Friday, July 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42874-42875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12074]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Submission of Collection of Water Delivery and Electric Service
Data for the Operation of Irrigation and Power Projects and Systems to
the Office of Management and Budget
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Bureau of
Indian Affairs (BIA) is submitting the information collection titled:
Electrical Service Application, 25 CFR 175, OMB Control Number 1076-
0021, and Water Request, 25 CFR 171, OMB Central Number 1076-0141, for
reinstatement, review, and approval. These collections expired during
the Paperwork Reduction Act renewal process.
DATES: Submit comments on or before August 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the information collection to the
Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior at the Office of
Management and Budget, by facsimile at (202) 395-6566 or you may send
an e-mail to: OIRA--DOCKET@omb.eop.gov.
Please send a copy of the comments to John Anevski, Bureau of
Indian Affairs, Branch of Irrigation, Power, and Safety of Dams, Mail
Stop 4655-MIB, Washington, DC 20240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You may request further information or
obtain copies of the information collection request submission from
John Anevski at (202) 208-5480, or by facsimile at (202) 219-0006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments on these two information
collections were requested in a Federal Register notice published
February 28, 2006 (71 FR 10054). No comments were received.
Request for Comments
The Bureau of Indian Affairs requests you to send your comments on
this collection to the two locations listed in the ADDRESSES section.
The Bureau of Indian Affairs solicits comments in order to:
[[Page 42875]]
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the bureau,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the bureau's estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond.
OMB has up to 60 days to approve or disapprove the information
collections but may respond after 30 days; therefore, comments
submitted within 30 days are more assured of receiving maximum
consideration. Please note that comments, names, addresses of
commentators are available for public review during normal business
hours. If you wish us to withhold any information you submit, you must
state this prominently at the beginning of your comment. We will honor
your request to the extent allowable by law.
Water Request
Type of review: Reinstatement with a change of a previously
approved collection.
Title: Water Request, 25 CFR 171.
Summary: In order for irrigators to receive water deliveries,
information is needed by the BIA to operate and maintain its irrigation
projects and fulfill reporting requirements. Section 171.7 of 25 CFR
part 171, [Irrigation] Operation and Maintenance, specifies the
information collection requirement. Water users must apply for water
delivery. The information to be collected includes: Name; water
delivery location; time and date of requested water delivery; duration
of water delivery; rate of water flow; number of acres irrigated; crop
statistics; and other operational information identified in the local
administrative manuals. Collection of this information was previously
authorized under an approval by OMB (OMB Control Number 1076-0141). All
information is collected at least annually from each water user with a
response required each time irrigation water is provided. Annual
reporting and record keeping burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 8 minutes per request. There is a range of 1 to
10 requests from each irrigation water user each season with an average
of 4 responses per respondent.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Description of Respondents: BIA Irrigation Project Water Users.
Total Respondents: 6539.
Total Annual Responses: 26,945.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 13,756 hours.
Electrical Service Application
Type of review: Reinstatement of a previously approved collection.
Title: Electric Service Application, 25 CFR 175.
Summary: In order for electric power consumers to be served,
information is needed by the BIA to operate and maintain its electric
power utilities and fulfill reporting requirements. Section 175.22 of
25 CFR part 175, Indian electric power utilities, specifies the
information collection requirement. Power consumers must apply for
electric service. The information to be collected includes: name;
electric service location; and other operational information identified
in the local administrative manuals. Collection of this information was
authorized under an approval by OMB (OMB Control Number 1076-0021). All
information is collected from each electric power consumer. Annual
reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 30 minutes for each response for 3,000
respondents, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Thus, the total
annual reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection is
estimated to be 1,500 hours.
Frequency of Collection: On Occasion.
Description of Respondents: BIA Electric Power Consumers.
Total Respondents: 3,000.
Total Annual Responses: 3,000.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,500 hours.
Dated: July 20, 2006.
Michael D. Olsen,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. E6-12074 Filed 7-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-W7-P