Fees for Customs Processing at Express Consignment Carrier Facilities, 42778-42785 [E6-12067]
Download as PDF
42778
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 145 / Friday, July 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
023, dated June 23, 2005, as an additional
source of service information for replacing
the mini-latches on certain lavatory waste
compartment doors required by paragraph (f)
of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Related Information
(h) Brazilian airworthiness directive 2005–
11–01, effective December 8, 2005, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 20,
2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–12106 Filed 7–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[USCBP–2006–0015]
19 CFR Parts 24, 113, and 128
RIN 1505–AB39
Fees for Customs Processing at
Express Consignment Carrier Facilities
Customs and Border Protection,
Homeland Security; Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document proposes
amendments to title 19 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (19 CFR) to reflect
changes to the customs user fee statute
made by section 337 of the Trade Act of
2002 and section 2004(f) of the
Miscellaneous Trade and Technical
Corrections Act of 2004. The statutory
amendments made by section 337
concern the fees payable for customs
services provided in connection with
the informal entry or release of
shipments at express consignment
carrier facilities and centralized hub
facilities, and primarily serve to replace
the annual lump sum payment
procedure with a quarterly payment
procedure based on a specific fee for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 Jul 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
each individual air waybill or bill of
lading. Section 2004(f) amended the
user fee statute to authorize, for
merchandise that is formally entered at
these sites, the assessment of
merchandise processing fees provided
for in 19 U.S.C. 58c(a)(9), in addition to
the fees that are currently assessed on
individual air waybills or bills of lading.
Lastly, pursuant to the authority
established in 19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(9)(B)(i),
this document proposes to raise the
existing $0.66 fee assessed on
individual air waybills or bills of lading
to $1.00 to more equitably align it with
the actual costs incurred by CBP in
processing these items.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number, by one of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
via docket number USCBP–2006–0015.
• Mail: Trade and Commercial
Regulations Branch, Office of
Regulations and Rulings, Bureau of
Customs and Border Protection, 1300
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. (Mint
Annex), Washington, DC 20229.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the electronic
docket to read background documents
or comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submitted
comments may also be inspected during
regular business days between the hours
of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Office of
Regulations and Rulings, Bureau of
Customs and Border Protection, 799 9th
Street, NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC.
Arrangements to inspect submitted
comments should be made in advance
by calling Joseph Clark at (202) 572–
8768.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael L. Jackson, Office of Field
Operations, Trade Enforcement and
Facilitation, Tel.: (202) 344–1196.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to
participate in this rulemaking by
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submitting written data, views, or
arguments on all aspects of the
proposed rule. The Bureau of Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) also invites
comments that relate to the economic
effects that might result from this
proposed rule. If appropriate to a
specific comment, the commenter
should reference the specific portion of
the proposed rule, explain the reason for
any recommended change, and include
data, information, or authority that
support such recommended change.
Background
I. Statutory Changes Made by Section
337(a) of the Trade Act of 2002
On August 6, 2002, the President
signed into law the Trade Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–210, 116 Stat. 933.
Section 337(a) of the Trade Act of 2002
amended section 13031(b)(9) of the
Consolidated Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C.
58c(b)(9)) by adding new requirements
for the payment of user fees for customs
services provided by CBP to express
consignment carrier facilities and
centralized hub facilities in connection
with imported letters, documents,
shipments or other merchandise to
which informal entry procedures apply.
The principal changes involve the
following:
1. In the introductory text of section
58c(b)(9)(A), which refers to
reimbursements and payments required
from a centralized hub facility, an
express consignment carrier facility, or
a small airport or other facility, the
words ‘‘the processing of merchandise
that is informally entered or released’’
were replaced by the words ‘‘the
processing of letters, documents,
records, shipments, merchandise, or any
other item that is valued at an amount
that is less than $2,000 (or such higher
amount as the Secretary of the Treasury
may set by regulation pursuant to
section 498 of the Tariff Act of 1930),
except such items entered for
transportation and exportation or
immediate exportation.’’ [It is noted that
the statutory monetary amount was
subsequently amended to ‘‘$2,000 or
less * * *’’ as discussed later in this
document.]
2. Section 58c(b)(9)(A)(ii) was
replaced by new text identifying, in the
case of an express consignment carrier
facility or a centralized hub facility, a
fee of $0.66 per individual air waybill
or bill of lading. Prior to this
amendment, clause (ii) required an
express consignment carrier facility or a
centralized hub facility to make the
following reimbursements and
payments:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 145 / Friday, July 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(a) A reimbursement to Customs
(hereinafter referred to as ‘‘CBP’’ to
reflect the transfer of the U.S. Customs
Service to the Department of Homeland
Security and the agency’s subsequent
renaming as Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection) of an amount equal
to the cost of the services provided by
CBP for the facility during the fiscal
year; and
(b) An annual payment by the facility
to the Secretary of the Treasury in an
amount equal to the annual
reimbursement made under 19 U.S.C.
58c(b)(9)(A)(ii)(I).
3. Subparagraph (B) was redesignated
as subparagraph (C) and a new
subparagraph (B) was added. New
subparagraph (B) consists of clauses (i)
through (iii) which provide as follows:
(a) Clause (i) authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to adjust the $0.66 fee
prescribed in subparagraph (A)(i) to an
amount that is not less than $0.35 and
not more than $1.00 per individual air
waybill or bill of lading. Clause (i)
further provides that the adjustment
may not be made before fiscal year 2004
and not more than once per fiscal year
and must involve publication of notice
of the proposed adjustment in the
Federal Register with opportunity for
public comment;
(b) Clause (ii) provides that the
payment required by subparagraph
(A)(ii) is the only payment required for
reimbursement of CBP in connection
with the processing of an individual air
waybill or bill of lading in accordance
with that subparagraph and for
providing services at express
consignment carrier facilities or
centralized hub facilities, except that
CBP may require those facilities to cover
CBP expenses for adequate office space,
equipment, furnishings, supplies, and
security.
(c) Clause (iii)(I) provides that the
payment required under subparagraphs
(A)(ii) and (B)(ii) is to be paid to CBP
on a quarterly basis by the carrier using
the facility in accordance with
regulations prescribed by the Secretary
of the Treasury. Clause (iii)(II) states
that 50 percent of the amount of
payments received under subparagraphs
(A)(ii) and (B)(ii) will, in accordance
with 19 U.S.C. 1524, be deposited in the
Customs (CBP) User Fee Account and
used to directly reimburse each
appropriation for the amount paid out of
that appropriation for costs incurred in
providing services to express
consignment carrier facilities or
centralized hub facilities. Such amounts
are to remain available until expended
for the provision of customs services to
these entities. Clause (iii)(III) directs the
remaining 50 percent of the amount of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 Jul 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
payments received under subparagraphs
(A)(ii) and (B)(ii) to be paid to the
Secretary of the Treasury. See 19 U.S.C.
58c(b)(9)(B)(iii)(I)—(III).
Section 337(b) of the Trade Act of
2002 provides that the amendments
made by section 337(a) take effect on
October 1, 2002.
The following points are noted
regarding the effect of the statutory
changes made by section 337(a) of the
Trade Act of 2002:
1. The overall effect of section 337(a)
is to replace two equal annual lump
sum payments (one representing a
reimbursement of the cost of services
provided and the other representing a
payment in lieu of the payment of fees
for the informal entry or release of
merchandise) with a quarterly payment
procedure based on a specific fee for
each individual air waybill or bill of
lading.
2. The $2,000 limit referred to in the
amended statute reflects the amount
that CBP, pursuant to section 498 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19
U.S.C. 1498), has adopted in § 143.21 of
title 19 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (19 CFR 143.21) as the limit
for shipments of merchandise that may
be entered under informal entry.
3. The replacement of the word
‘‘merchandise’’ by a reference to
‘‘letters, documents, records, shipments,
merchandise, or any other item’’ in the
amended statute ensures that other
imported articles or items that are
eligible for informal entry under
§ 143.21 will be subject to the new fee.
The one exception concerns those
articles (for example, articles of plastics
or rubber, textiles and textile articles,
leather articles, and footwear) for which
the informal entry limit is set at $250 in
§ 143.21; for those articles having a
value greater than $250 but less than
$2,000, the new fee standard will apply
even though those articles are not
subject to informal entry procedures
under § 143.21.
4. Each shipment transported by
affected carriers is issued an individual
air waybill that is used, among other
things, for tracking purposes. Because
the law applies the fee to each
individual air waybill, the use of master
bills or other practices of consolidation
or convenience by these entities, the
billing system used by these entities for
their customers, and the number of
entries filed, are irrelevant to the
application of the fee. In effect, the
individual air waybill subject to the fee
is the bill at the lowest level, i.e., not a
master bill. An example of an individual
airway bill or bill of lading is a bill
representing an individual shipment
that has its own unique bill number and
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42779
tracking number, where shipment is
assigned to a single ultimate consignee,
and no lower (more disaggregated) bill
unit exists.
5. Under the amended statute,
responsibility for payment rests with the
carrier rather than with the facility. This
does not represent a substantive change
in the case of centralized hub facilities
because the hub facility owner and the
carrier using the facility are always the
same. However, it does represent a shift
in responsibility for payment, from the
facility to the carrier, in the case of
express consignment carrier facilities
that are not owned and operated by the
different carriers that use them.
6. The affected carriers became
responsible for payment of the new fee
for each individual covered transaction
as of October 1, 2002, effective date of
the amendments made by section 337(a)
of the Trade Act of 2002. Therefore,
even though the first payment to CBP
under the new payment procedure
would not have taken place until after
the close of the last quarter of the year
2002, the statute obligated the affected
carriers to maintain adequate records to
determine the proper amount to be paid
starting on the effective date of the
statutory amendments.
II. Statutory Changes Made by Section
2004(f) of the Miscellaneous Trade and
Technical Corrections Act of 2004
The Miscellaneous Trade and
Technical Corrections Act of 2004
(‘‘Trade Act of 2004’’) was signed into
law by the President on December 3,
2004 (Pub. L. 108–429, 18 Stat. 2593).
Section 2004(f) of the Trade Act of 2004
made further amendments to section
13031(b)(9) of the Consolidated
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(9)). The principal
changes made by section 2004(f) are set
forth below:
1. In the introductory text of section
58c(b)(9)(A), which refers to
reimbursements and payments to CBP
required from a centralized hub facility,
an express consignment carrier facility,
or a small airport or other facility, the
words ‘‘less than $2,000’’ were replaced
by the words ‘‘$2,000 or less’’.
2. Section 58c(b)(9)(A)(ii), which
requires an express consignment carrier
facility or a centralized hub facility to
reimburse CBP in an amount of $0.66
per individual air waybill or bill of
lading, was amended by: (a) Adding the
language, ‘‘[N]otwithstanding
subsection (e)(6)’’ at the beginning of the
section; and (b) restructuring this
provision by creating two new subclauses. The first new sub-clause,
identified as (A)(ii)(I), sets forth the
existing reimbursement fee of $0.66 per
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
42780
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 145 / Friday, July 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
individual air waybill or bill of lading.
The second new sub-clause, identified
as (A)(ii)(II), pertains to situations where
merchandise is formally entered and
mandates, in addition to the fee
specified in sub-clause (A)(ii)(I),
reimbursement to CBP of the fee
provided for in subsection (a)(9) (the
merchandise processing fee), if
applicable. See 19 U.S.C. 58c(a)(9).
3. To accommodate the amendments
to subparagraph (A)(ii), discussed
above, conforming changes were made
to section 58c(b)(9)(B)(ii) whereby the
statutory reference to ‘‘(A)(ii)’’ was
replaced with a reference to ‘‘(A)(ii)(I) or
(II)’’.
III. Proposal To Increase Certain
Reimbursement Fees Payable by Express
Consignment Carrier Facilities and
Centralized Hub Facilities
As noted above, 19 U.S.C.
58c(b)(9)(B)(i), as amended by section
337(a) of the Trade Act of 2002,
authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury
to adjust the $0.66 fee prescribed in 19
U.S.C. 58c(b)(9)(A)(ii) to an amount that
is not less than $0.35 and not more than
$1.00 per individual air waybill or bill
of lading. This section further provides
that notice of any proposed adjustment
and the reasons therefore must be
published in the Federal Register with
opportunity for public comment.
Pursuant to this authority, this
document proposes to increase the
existing $0.66 reimbursement fee
payable to CBP by express consignment
carrier facilities and centralized carrier
facilities to $1.00. The proposed fee
increase is necessary to more adequately
reimburse CBP for the actual costs
Fiscal year
2004* .......
2005* .......
2006** ......
Estimated
package
volume
47,243,205
45,364,139
43,549,574
Total
collections
(based on
$.66 cents
per bill)
$31,180,516
29,940,332
28,742,718
incurred by the agency in processing
individual air waybills and bills of
lading at these sites. It is also noted that
in addition to the regular costs
associated with processing individual
air waybills and bills of lading, CBP
must also incur the expenses associated
with relocating CBP personnel when a
carrier opts to close a carrier-owned
express consignment facility and open a
new facility at a different location. The
current fee schedule does not
sufficiently cover CBP’s regular
expenses at these sites.
As discussed previously, the
amendments to section 58c(b)(9)(B)
made by section 337(a) of the Trade Act
of 2002 direct that the money collected
by CBP from this one payment be sent
to two different accounts. Section
58c(b)(9)(B)(iii)(II) requires fifty percent
of the payment to be deposited in the
CBP User Fee Account and used to
directly reimburse each appropriation
for the amount paid out of that
appropriation for the costs incurred in
providing services to express
consignment carrier facilities and
centralized hub facilities. Such amounts
are available until expended for the
provision of custom services for these
facilities. Section 58c(b)(9)(B)(iii)(III)
requires the remaining fifty percent to
be paid to the Secretary of the Treasury
in lieu of an informal entry Merchandise
Processing Fee (MPF). Prior to the 2002
amendment, the law provided for two
payments: One payment was made to
CBP as the fee to cover agency expenses
incurred by providing customs services
relating to staffing for the onsite
processing and release of cargo at
express consignment carrier facilities,
CBP’s retained portion of
collected amount
(based on $.33 cents per bill)
$15,590,258 ...............................
$14,970,166 ...............................
$14,371,359
($21,774,787
based on $.50 cents collected
per bill if the payment is
raised to $1.00).
CBP costs
and the second payment was made to
the Treasury in lieu of the informal
entry Merchandise Processing Fee
(MPF). Thus, the current payment
structure provides for a single payment
collected by CBP and deposited in two
separate sub-accounts, whereas
previously two separate fees were paid
to CBP and Treasury. In neither case did
fees exceed direct costs. In fact,
collected fees were well below direct
costs. Under this proposal, fees will
approach costs up to the new statutory
cap.
CBP has conducted a financial
analysis of the costs incurred by CBP in
providing services to express
consignment facilities and centralized
hub facilities in Fiscal Years (FY) 2004
and 2005. The collection/cost data
reveals that at the close of FY 2004, the
half of the 58c(b)(9)(A)(ii) payment
intended to defray the cost of services
to express consignment and centralized
hub facilities left the agency with a
deficit with the agency collecting only
78% of the monies expended to provide
those services. In FY 2005, CBP
collected only 70% of these costs.
Projections for FY 2006 indicate that the
deficit will increase again due to the fact
that certain CBP expenses, such as
reimbursable wages for CBP employees
at these sites, will increase.
The following table sets forth the
collection/cost data associated with
CBP’s processing of individual air
waybills and bills of lading at express
consignment facilities and centralized
hub facilities for FY 2004 and 2005, as
well as a projected financial analysis for
FY 2006:
CBP cost
per bill
$19,945,704
21,393,520
22,545,880
0.42
0.47
0.52
CBP deficit
($4,355,446).
($6,423,354).
($8,174,521) (($771,093) based
on $.50 cents collected per
bill if the payment is raised to
$1.00).
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
* FY 2004 and 2005 costs information from the CBP Cost Management Information System.
** FY 2006 costs equal FY 2005 costs plus 27 new CBP Officer positions Grade 11 Step 1 with a prorated onboard date of April 2006. New
position cost information derived from the FY 2006 CBP position model and does not include any equipment, training, travel costs, etc.
The financial projections for FY 2006
indicate that CBP will incur a per bill
cost of $0.52. If the payment is raised to
$1.00, as proposed, CBP will collect
$0.50 per bill (the other $0.50 to be
deposited with the Secretary of the
Treasury in lieu of the informal entry
Merchandise Processing Fee).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 Jul 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
Based on these figures, and subject to
the monetary limits set by law, CBP
proposes raising the $0.66 payment to
$1.00 so that the half of the payment
associated with providing services to
express consignment and centralized
hub facilities is aligned with the actual
costs incurred by CBP. The other half of
the payment, collected in lieu of the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
MPF, is set by statute at equal to the
payment for providing services to
express consignment and centralized
hub facilities.
Affected Regulatory Provisions
Regulations implementing those
provisions of 19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(9) that
were amended by section 337(a) of the
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 145 / Friday, July 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Trade Act of 2002 and section 2004(f) of
the Trade Act of 2004 are contained in
parts 24 and 128 of title 19 of the CFR
(19 CFR parts 24 and 128).
Part 24 sets forth rules pertaining to
CBP’s financial and accounting
procedures. The provision within part
24 most directly affected by the
statutory changes discussed above is
§ 24.23, which concerns fees for
processing merchandise and which, in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii), reflects the terms of
subparagraph (A) of the statute prior to
its amendment by sections 337(a) and
2004(f). Also affected is § 24.17, which
provides for reimbursable services of
CBP employees. Specifically, paragraph
(a)(12) of that section refers to
reimbursement of the compensation and
expenses of a CBP employee assigned to
a centralized hub facility for the
purpose of processing express
consignment shipments under part 128
of the regulations, and paragraph (a)(13)
contains a similar reimbursement
reference regarding a CBP employee
assigned to an express consignment
carrier facility, with the facility being
responsible for the reimbursement in
each case.
Part 128 sets forth regulations that
apply specifically to express
consignment carrier and hub facilities
and their operators and users. The only
provision within part 128 that is
directly affected by the statutory
changes discussed above is § 128.11,
which concerns the express
consignment carrier and hub facility
application process. Paragraphs
(b)(7)(iv) and (v) of that section require
the express consignment entity to agree
to timely pay all reimbursable costs and
to pay to CBP all relocation, training
and other costs and expenses incurred
by CBP in relocating necessary staff to
or from the facility.
This document proposes amendments
to title 19 of the CFR to address the
statutory changes made by section
337(a) of the Trade Act of 2002 and
2004(f) of the Trade Act of 2004. In
addition to the proposed changes to
parts 24 and 128 mentioned above, this
document also contains a proposed
amendment to the CBP bond provisions
of part 113 of title 19 of the CFR (19 CFR
part 113). The proposed changes to the
regulations contained in this document
are discussed below.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Discussion of Proposed Amendments
Section 24.17
In this section, which includes in
paragraph (a) a list of various contexts
in which parties-in-interest are required
to reimburse CBP for services rendered,
it is proposed to remove paragraph
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 Jul 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
(a)(12) (which refers to services
rendered at a centralized hub facility)
and paragraph (a)(13) (which refers to
services rendered at an express
consignment carrier facility) and
redesignate paragraph (a)(14) as
paragraph (a)(12).
The proposed removals are necessary
because those two provisions: (1)
correspond to clause (ii) of
subparagraph (A) of the statute as it
existed prior to the amendments made
by sections 337(a) and 2004(f); and (2)
are inconsistent with the ‘‘only payment
required’’ language in clause (ii) of new
subparagraph (B) of the statute.
Section 24.23
In this section, it is proposed to
modify paragraph (b) to incorporate the
terms of the proposed $1.00 fee
(increased from the existing $0.66 fee)
and paragraph (c) to include conforming
cross-reference changes. The following
points are noted regarding the proposed
paragraph (b) changes:
1. In paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A), which
concerns the 0.21 percent ad valorem
fee (merchandise processing fee)
applicable to merchandise that is
formally entered or released, a new
sentence is added with a cross-reference
to new paragraph (b)(4) to reflect the
terms of section 2004(f) whereby, in the
case of an express consignment carrier
facility or centralized hub facility,
merchandise that is formally entered is
subject to a $1.00 per individual air
waybill or bill of lading fee and, if
applicable, to a merchandise processing
fee.
2. Paragraph (b)(2), which concerns
fees for informal entry or release, is
revised to refer to only the $2, $6, and
$9 specific fees which, under the statute
and the regulations, have never applied
to express consignment carrier facilities,
centralized hub facilities, and small
airports and other facilities. The revised
paragraph (b)(2) text includes new
exception language regarding
merchandise covered by paragraph
(b)(3) or paragraph (b)(4).
3. A new paragraph (b)(3) concerning
small airports and other facilities is
added. It is based on the relevant
portion of current paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A)
of § 24.23 that is proposed to be
removed in the revision of paragraph
(b)(2). The fee for small airports and
other facilities is authorized by 19
U.S.C. 58c(b)(9)(A)(i). The fee is
determined by application of 31 U.S.C.
9701. New paragraph (b)(3) follows that
statutory structure.
4. Paragraph (b)(4) is entirely new.
Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(9)(A)(ii)(I)
and (II), as amended by sections 337(a)
and 2004(f), paragraph (b)(4) requires
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42781
each carrier using an express
consignment carrier facility or a
centralized hub facility to pay to CBP a
fee (set forth in 19 U.S.C.
58c(b)(9)(A)(ii)(I) at $0.66 and now
proposed to be increased to $1.00, as
discussed above) assessed on each
individual air waybill or individual bill
of lading and, if merchandise is formally
entered, the 0.21 ad valorem fee, if
applicable.
The assessment of this fee on each
individual air waybill or bill of lading
means that each shipment transported
by a carrier and processed by CBP will
be assessed the fee. Each shipment
transported by a carrier and processed
by CBP is represented by an individual
air waybill and subject to the fee.
Therefore, these proposed regulations
apply the fee to each shipment covered
by an individual air waybill. For
purposes of these proposed regulations,
an individual airway bill is the bill at
the lowest level, and would not include
a master bill. An example of an
individual air waybill or bill of lading
is a bill representing an individual
shipment that has its own unique bill
number and tracking number, where the
shipment is assigned to a single ultimate
consignee, and no lower bill unit exists.
The use of master bills of lading, or
other practices of consolidation by or for
the convenience of the carrier, or its
customers or for any other reason is
irrelevant to the application of this user
fee intended to cover CBP’s costs
associated with processing each
individual shipment as represented by
each individual air waybill or bill of
lading. Moreover, the number and kind
of entries filed, and the carrier’s billing
system for charging its customers, are
irrelevant factors and are not considered
in determining the fee’s application.
Paragraph (b)(4) also includes the
quarterly payment requirement
specified in clause (iii) of new
subparagraph (B) of the amended
statute. As in the case of paragraph
(b)(3), discussed above, the text of
paragraph (b)(4) includes the
‘‘processing of letters, documents
* * *’’ and the ‘‘$2,000 or less (or such
higher amount * * *)’’ language of the
introductory text of subparagraph (A) of
the amended statute, and also contains
the exception reference regarding items
entered for transportation and
exportation or immediate exportation
that clearly is relevant to the
transaction-by-transaction assessment of
the $1.00 fee.
The text of paragraph (b)(4) also
proposes some additional requirements
and conditions regarding the payment of
this fee, of which the following points
are noted:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
42782
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 145 / Friday, July 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
1. In addition to identifying the due
date for each timely quarterly payment
as well as the CBP address to which the
payments must be sent, the text sets
forth specific information that must
accompany the payment. The specified
information is necessary to enable CBP
to verify whether the proper amount of
fees required under the statute has been
paid.
2. The text allows carriers to make
adjustments of overpayments and
underpayments in the next quarterly
payment, similar to what is allowed in
the case of railroad car and passenger
arrival fees under § 24.22(d) and (g) of
the CBP regulations (19 CFR 24.22(d)
and (g)). However, if an adjustment is
not made in the next quarterly payment,
a request for a refund of an overpayment
must be made within one year, similar
to the practice in the case of harbor
maintenance fees under § 24.24(e)(4)(ii)
of the CBP regulations (19 CFR
24.24(e)(4)(ii)), and interest will accrue
in the case of an underpayment from the
date payment was initially due.
3. Paragraph (b)(4)(iv) provides that
the underpayment or failure of a carrier
using an express consignment carrier
facility or a centralized hub facility to
pay all applicable fees owed pursuant to
paragraph (b) may result in the
assessment of penalties under 19 U.S.C.
1592 and any other action authorized by
law.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Section 113.64
In this section, which specifies the
international carrier bond conditions, it
is proposed to add a new sentence at the
end of paragraph (a) to refer to the
obligation of the carrier and its surety
under the bond in the event that the
carrier fails to pay the fees required
under § 24.23(b)(4). This provision is
modeled on the approach taken in the
case of quarterly payments of passenger
processing fees.
Section 128.11
In this section, which concerns the
express consignment facility application
process, the following changes are
proposed:
1. Paragraph (b)(2) is revised to
require inclusion of a list of users of the
facility with the application if the
applicant is an express consignment
carrier facility (a list of users is not
necessary in the case of a hub facility
because the operator of the facility and
the user of the facility are one and the
same). This information is necessary to
assist CBP in verifying proper payment
of the statutory fees.
2. Paragraphs (b)(7)(iv) and (b)(7)(v),
which refer to elements of the
superseded statutory reimbursement
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 Jul 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
concept, have been replaced with new
provisions. New paragraph (b)(7)(iv)
provides for an agreement on the part of
an express consignment carrier facility
to provide quarterly, and update, a list
of all carriers using the facility and is
intended to assist CBP in verifying the
proper payment of fees by those carriers.
Paragraph (b)(7)(v) refers to an
agreement on the part of a hub facility
or an express consignment carrier to
timely pay all applicable processing fees
prescribed in § 24.23.
Comments
Submitted comments will be available
for public inspection in accordance with
the Freedom of Information Act (5
U.S.C. 552) and § 103.11(b) of title 19 of
the CFR (19 CFR 103.11(b)), on regular
business days between the hours of 9
a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Trade and
Commercial Regulations Branch, Office
of Regulations and Rulings, Customs
and Border Protection, 799 9th St., NW.,
Washington, DC. Arrangements to
inspect submitted documents should be
made in advance by calling Joseph Clark
at (202) 572–8768.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is not considered a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in E.O. 12866. Accordingly, a
regulatory assessment is not required.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Analysis
CBP has examined the impacts of the
proposed rule on small entities as
required by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (Pub. L. 96–354, 94 Stat. 1164,
codified at 5 U.S.C. chapter 6) and has
prepared an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Act Analysis (IRFA). A small
entity may be a small business (defined
as any independently owned and
operated business not dominant in its
field that qualifies as a small business
per the Small Business Act); a small notfor-profit organization; or a small
governmental jurisdiction (locality with
fewer than 50,000 people).
In this proposed rulemaking, small
businesses are those that employ fewer
than 1,500 employees or have annual
revenues under $6.5 million. Based on
annual data collected by CBP, there are
22 businesses that will be affected by
the proposed rule. Of these, 10 are large
businesses, 11 are small businesses, and
1 is a small, foreign-owned business.
Sixteen of these companies (both large
and small) are members of an
association that owns and operates a
consignment facility. That association
acts as a single respondent for its
members.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Reason for Agency Action; Objectives of
and Legal Basis for the Proposed Rule
Pursuant to the authority established
in 19 U.S.C. 58c(a)(9)(b)(ii), it is
proposed to raise the existing $0.66 fee
assessed on individual air waybills or
bills of lading to $1.00 to more equitably
align it with the actual costs incurred by
CBP in processing these items.
Number and Types of Small Entities to
Which the Proposed Rule Will Apply
As previously noted, there are 12
small businesses that will be affected by
the proposed rule. These companies are
either courier services (NAICS code
492110) or arrange freight transportation
(NAICS code 488510).
An estimated 91 percent of the bills
of lading submitted for fee assessment
were from the three largest affected
companies (approximately 41 million
waybills in FY 2005). The waybills from
the remaining large companies
accounted for 2 percent (approximately
865,000 in FY 2005). The remaining 1.5
million bills of lading were submitted
by the 12 small businesses.
Based on data from FY 2003 to FY
2005, half of the large companies have
experienced annual increases in bills of
lading; the remainder have experienced
annual decreases. Data for the 12 small
businesses also show increases and
decreases in waybills. If current trends
continue, a net increase in waybills of
approximately 20 percent annually is
projected for these small companies
over the next several years.
In FY 2005, the 12 small businesses
submitted 1.5 million bills of lading at
a cost of $1.0 million ($0.66 per bill of
lading). If, in FY 2006, 1.9 million bills
of lading were submitted, this would
result in a cost of $1.3 million under the
current fee structure. Under the
proposed fee of $1.00 per bill, we would
expect costs to reach $1.9 million, a
difference of $0.6 million. The $0.6
million represents only 4 percent of the
total increase in fees CBP expects to be
incurred as a result of growth in bills of
lading and the fee increase proposed in
this rule.
CBP collected annual revenue data for
the 12 small businesses affected. To
determine the impact of the proposed
rule on annual revenues, CBP calculated
the projected difference in costs
between the old and proposed fee and
compared that (as a percentage) to
average annual revenues. Based on these
calculations, CBP estimates that the
proposed rule will have a 5-percent
impact or less on annual revenues for 5
of the small businesses. The rule will
have a 5 to 10-percent impact on one of
the companies and a greater than 10-
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
42783
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 145 / Friday, July 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
percent impact on four companies. CBP
could not find data for one small
business, and one was foreign-owned.
In the course of CBP’s examination of
the impacts on annual revenues for
these small businesses, CBP has
determined that these entities will likely
pass the cost of the increased fee on to
their customers to the extent that they
are able.
On the basis of the foregoing analysis,
CBP concludes that this proposed rule
could have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
CBP is seeking comments on any of the
regulatory requirements that could
minimize the cost to small businesses.
Comments may be submitted to the
regulatory docket using any of the
methods listed under ‘‘Comments’’ or
ADDRESSES above. All input received
during the public comment period will
be considered.
Reporting and Recordkeeping
This proposed rule will change
current paperwork requirements. No
new professional skills will be
necessary for the preparations of the
reports and records. For more detail, see
‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’ below.
Other Federal Rules
This proposed rule does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with other
federal regulations.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Alternatives
CBP did not consider any alternatives
to the proposed rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collections of information in this
document are contained in §§ 24.23 and
128.11 (19 CFR 24.23 and 128.11). This
information is used by CBP to determine
whether user fees required by statute
have been properly paid. The likely
respondents are business organizations
including importers and air carriers.
The collections of information for
paying fees for customs services
provided in connection with the
informal entry or release of shipments at
express consignment carrier facilities
and centralized hub facilities was
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under control
number 1651–0052. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507), CBP has submitted to
OMB for review the following
adjustments to the information provided
to OMB for the previously approved
OMB control number to account for the
changes proposed in this rule. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 Jul 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
displays a valid control number
assigned by OMB.
Report for quarterly payment under
§ 24.23(b)(4)(ii):
Estimated annual reporting and/or
recordkeeping burden: 176 hours.
Estimated average annual burden per
respondent/recordkeeper: 8 hours.
Estimated number of respondents
and/or recordkeepers: 22.
Estimated annual frequency of
responses: 4.
Report for refund of overpayment
under § 24.23(b)(4)(iii):
Estimated annual reporting and/or
recordkeeping burden: 5 hours.
Estimated average annual burden per
respondent/recordkeeper: 1 hour.
Estimated number of respondents
and/or recordkeepers: 5.
Estimated annual frequency of
responses: 2.
Report by operators including the list
of carriers under § 128.11(b):
Estimated annual reporting and/or
recordkeeping burden: 6 hours.
Estimated average annual burden per
respondent/recordkeeper: 2 hours.
Estimated number of respondents
and/or recordkeepers: 3.
Estimated annual frequency of
responses: 4.
Comments on the collection of
information should be sent to the Office
of Management and Budget, Attention:
Desk Officer for the Department of
Homeland Security, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Washington, DC 20503. A copy should
also be sent to the Regulations Branch,
Office of Regulations and Rulings,
Customs and Border Protection, 1300
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. (Mint
Annex), Washington, DC 20229.
Comments should be submitted within
the time frame that comments are due
regarding the substance of the proposal.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of the information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (e) estimates of capital or startup
costs and costs of operations,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information.
Signing Authority
This document is being issued in
accordance with § 0.1(a)(1) of the CBP
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
regulations (19 CFR 0.1(a)(1)) pertaining
to the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury (or his/her delegate) to
approve regulations related to certain
CBP revenue functions.
List of Subjects
19 CFR Part 24
Accounting, Claims, Customs duties
and inspection, Exports, Imports,
Interest, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Taxes, User fees, Wages.
19 CFR Part 113
Air carriers, Bonds, Customs duties
and inspection, Exports, Freight,
Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Surety bonds.
19 CFR Part 128
Administrative practice and
procedure, Carriers, Couriers, Customs
duties and inspection, Entry, Express
consignments, Freight, Imports,
Informal entry procedures, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, parts 24, 113, and 128 of title
19 of the CFR (19 CFR parts 24, 113, and
128), are proposed to be amended as set
forth below.
PART 24—CUSTOMS FINANCIAL AND
ACCOUNTING PROCEDURE
1. The authority citation for part 24
continues to read in part as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 58a–58c,
66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1505,
1520, 1624; 26 U.S.C. 4461, 4462; 31 U.S.C.
9701; Public Law 107–296, 116 Stat. 2135 (6
U.S.C. 1 et seq.).
*
*
*
*
*
Section 24.17 also issued under 19 U.S.C.
261, 267, 1450, 1451, 1452, 1456, 1524, 1557,
1562; 46 U.S.C. 2110, 2111, 2112; Section
24.23 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 3332;
*
*
*
*
*
2. In § 24.17:
a. The section heading is revised to
read as set forth below;
b. Paragraphs (a) through (d) are
amended by removing the words
‘‘Customs employee’’ where they appear
and adding in each place the term ‘‘CBP
employee; and
c. Paragraphs (a)(12) and (a)(13) are
removed and paragraph (a)(14) is
redesignated as paragraph (a)(12).
§ 24.17 Reimbursable services of CBP
employees.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 24.23:
a. Paragraph (a) is amended by
removing the word ‘‘Customs’’ each
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
42784
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 145 / Friday, July 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
valued at $2,000 or less, or any higher
amount prescribed for purposes of
informal entry in § 143.21 of this
chapter, a small airport or other facility
must pay to CBP an amount equal to the
reimbursement (including overtime)
which the facility is required to make
during the fiscal year under § 24.17.
(4) Express consignment carrier and
centralized hub facilities. Each carrier
using an express consignment carrier
facility or a centralized hub facility
must pay to CBP a fee in the amount of
$1.00 per individual air waybill or
individual bill of lading and, if
merchandise is formally entered, the ad
valorem fee specified in paragraph (b)(1)
of this section, if applicable. An
individual air waybill or individual bill
of lading is the individual document
issued by the carrier for transporting
and/or tracking an individual item,
letter, package, envelope, record,
document, or shipment. An individual
air waybill is the bill at the lowest level,
§ 24.23 Fees for processing merchandise.
and is not a master bill or other
*
*
*
*
*
consolidated document. An individual
(b) Fees (1) Formal entry or release (i) air waybill or bill of lading is a bill
Ad valorem fee (A) General. Except as
representing an individual shipment
provided in paragraph (c) of this
that has its own unique bill number and
section, merchandise that is formally
tracking number, where the shipment is
entered or released is subject to the
assigned to a single ultimate consignee,
payment to CBP of an ad valorem fee of
and no lower bill unit exists. Payment
0.21 percent. The 0.21 ad valorem fee is must be made to CBP on a quarterly
due and payable to CBP by the importer basis and must cover the individual fees
of record of the merchandise at the time for all subject transactions that occurred
of presentation of the entry summary
during a calendar quarter. The following
and is based on the value of the
additional requirements and conditions
merchandise as determined under 19
apply to each quarterly payment made
U.S.C. 1401a. In the case of an express
under this section:
consignment carrier facility or
(i) The quarterly payment must
centralized hub facility, merchandise
conform to the requirements of § 24.1,
that is formally entered is subject to a
must be mailed to Customs and Border
$1.00 per individual air waybill or bill
Protection, Revenue Division/Attention:
of lading fee and, if applicable, to the
Reimbursables, 6650 Telecom Drive,
0.21 percent ad valorem fee which must Suite 100, Indianapolis, Indiana 46278,
be paid by the carrier as provided in
and must be received by CBP no later
paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
than the last day of the month that
*
*
*
*
*
follows the close of the calendar quarter
(2) Informal entry or release. Except in to which the payment relates.
(ii) The following information must be
the case of merchandise covered by
included with the quarterly payment:
paragraph (b)(3) or paragraph (b)(4) of
(A) The identity of the calendar
this section, and except as otherwise
quarter to which the payment relates;
provided in paragraph (c) of this
(B) The identity of the facility for
section, merchandise that is informally
which the payment is made and the port
entered or released is subject to the
code that applies to that location and, if
payment to CBP of a fee of:
the payment covers multiple facilities,
(i) $2 if the entry or release is
the identity of each facility and its port
automated and not prepared by CBP
code and the portion of the payment
personnel;
(ii) $6 if the entry or release is manual that pertains to each port code; and
(C) The total number of individual air
and not prepared by CBP personnel; or
(iii) $9 if the entry or release, whether waybills and individual bills of lading
covered by the payment, and a
automated or manual, is prepared by
breakdown of that total for each facility
CBP personnel.
covered by the payment according to the
(3) Small airport or other facility.
With respect to the processing of letters, number covered by formal entry
procedures, the number covered by
documents, records, shipments,
informal entry procedures specified in
merchandise, or any other item that is
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
place that it appears and adding the
term ‘‘CBP’’;
b. Paragraphs (b)(1)(i)(A) and
paragraph (b)(2) are revised;
c. New paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) are
added;
d. The introductory text of paragraph
(c)(1) is amended by removing the
reference ‘‘(b)(2)(i)’’ and adding, in its
place, the reference ‘‘(b)(2)’’;
e. Paragraph (c)(2)(i) is amended by
removing the reference ‘‘(b)(2)(i)’’ and
adding, in its place, the reference
‘‘(b)(2)’’;
f. The first sentence of paragraph
(c)(3) is amended by removing the
reference ‘‘(b)(2)(i)’’ and adding, in its
place, the reference ‘‘(b)(2)’’; and
g. Paragraph (c)(5) is amended by
removing the reference ‘‘(b)(2)(i)’’ and
adding, in its place, the reference
‘‘(b)(2)’’.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 Jul 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§§ 128.24(e) and 143.23(j) of this
chapter, and the number covered by
other informal entry procedures.
(iii) Overpayments or underpayments
may be accounted for by an explanation
in, and adjustment of, the next due
quarterly payment to CBP. In the case of
an overpayment or underpayment that
is not accounted for by an adjustment of
the next due quarterly payment to CBP:
(A) In the case of an overpayment, the
carrier may request a refund by writing
to Customs and Border Protection,
Revenue Division/Attention:
Reimbursables, 6650 Telecom Drive,
Suite 100, Indianapolis, Indiana 46278.
The refund request must specify the
grounds for the refund and must be
received by CBP within one year of the
date the fee for which the refund is
sought was paid to CBP; and
(B) In the case of an underpayment,
interest will accrue on the amount not
paid from the date payment was
initially due to the date that payment to
CBP is made.
(iv) The underpayment or failure of a
carrier using an express consignment
carrier facility or a centralized hub
facility to pay all applicable fees owed
to CBP pursuant to paragraph (b)(4) of
this section may result in the
assessment of penalties under 19 U.S.C.
1592 and any other action authorized by
law.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 113—CUSTOMS BONDS
4. The authority citation for part 113
continues to read in part as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1623, 1624.
*
*
*
*
*
5. In § 113.64, paragraph (a) is
amended by adding a new sentence at
the end to read as follows:
§ 113.64 International carrier bond
conditions.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * * If the principal (carrier) fails
to pay the fees for processing letters,
documents, records, shipments,
merchandise, or other items on or before
the last day of the month that follows
the close of the calendar quarter to
which the processing fees relate
pursuant to § 24.23(b)(4) of this chapter,
the obligors (principal and surety,
jointly and severally) agree to pay
liquidated damages equal to two times
the processing fees not timely paid to
CBP as prescribed by regulation.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 128—EXPRESS
CONSIGNMENTS
6. The authority citation for part 128
is revised to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 145 / Friday, July 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 58c, 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States), 1321, 1484, 1498, 1551, 1555,
1556, 1565, 1624.
7. In § 128.11, paragraphs (b)(2),
(b)(7)(iv) and (b)(7)(v) are revised to read
as follows:
§ 128.11 Express consignment carrier
application process.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) A statement of the general
character of the express consignment
operations that includes, in the case of
an express consignment carrier facility,
a list of carriers that intend to use the
facility.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) * * *
(iv) If the entity is an express
consignment carrier facility, provide to
Customs and Border Protection,
Revenue Division/Attention:
Reimbursables, 6650 Telecom Drive,
Suite 100, Indianapolis, Indiana 46278,
at the beginning of each calendar
quarter, a list of all carriers currently
using the facility and notify that office
whenever a new carrier begins to use
the facility or whenever a carrier ceases
to use the facility.
(v) If the entity is a hub facility or an
express consignment carrier, timely pay
all applicable processing fees prescribed
in § 24.23 of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
Deborah J. Spero,
Acting Commissioner, Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection.
Approved: July 24, 2006.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. E6–12067 Filed 7–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND
HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 2400
Regulations Implementing the Privacy
Act of 1974
Occupational Safety and Health
Review Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and
Health Review Commission (OSHRC) is
proposing to amend its regulations
implementing the Privacy Act of 1974,
5 U.S.C. 552a, as amended. The Privacy
Act has been amended multiple times
since OSHRC first promulgated its
regulations in 1979. The proposed
amendments to OSHRC’s regulations at
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 Jul 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
29 CFR part 2400 will assist the agency
in complying with the requirements of
the Privacy Act.
DATES: Comments must be received by
OSHRC on or before August 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: regsdocket@oshrc.gov.
Include ‘‘PRIVACY ACT PROPOSED
RULEMAKING’’ in the subject line of
the message.
• Fax: (202) 606–5417.
• Mail: One Lafayette Centre, 1120–
20th Street, NW., Ninth Floor,
Washington, DC 20036–3457.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
mailing address.
Instructions: All submissions must
include your name, return address and
e-mail address, if applicable. Please
clearly label submissions as ‘‘PRIVACY
ACT PROPOSED RULEMAKING.’’ If
you submit comments by e-mail, you
will receive an automatic confirmation
e-mail from the system indicating that
we have received your submission. If, in
response to your comment submitted
via e-mail, you do not receive a
confirmation e-mail within five working
days, contact us directly at (202) 606–
5410.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron
Bailey, Attorney-Advisor, Office of the
General Counsel, via telephone at (202)
606–5410, or via e-mail at
rbailey@oshrc.gov.
OSHRC’s
regulations implementing the Privacy
Act of 1974 were first promulgated on
January 19, 1979, 44 FR 3968. These
regulations have not been revised,
except for changes made to the office
address referenced in §§ 2400.6 and
2400.7, 58 FR 26065, April 30, 1993.
Since 1979, however, the Privacy Act
has been amended on numerous
occasions. As explained below, these
statutory changes, along with
intervening case law, compel OSHRC to
propose various amendments to its
regulations. Because OSHRC proposes
extensive revisions to its existing
regulations implementing the Privacy
Act, OSHRC has reproduced, for the
convenience of the reader, the revised
regulations to 29 CFR part 2400 in their
entirety in its proposed rulemaking.
The specific amendments that OSHRC
proposes include the following changes
which are discussed in regulatory
sequence.
OSHRC proposes amending its
authority citation to exclude all
references to popular names and
statutes at large. The Office of the
Federal Register has expressed a
preference for citing only to the United
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42785
States Code when referencing a Federal
statute.
In § 2400.1 (Purpose and scope),
OSHRC proposes making several
changes to clarify what 29 CFR part
2400 covers. In accordance with the
amendments to the Privacy Act
contained in section 2(b), Public Law
97–365 (5 U.S.C. 552a(m)(2)), OSHRC
proposes amending § 2400.1 to reflect
that part 2400 no longer covers systems
of records ‘‘that are disclosed to
consumer reporting agencies under
[section] 3711(e) of title 31, United
States Code.’’ Additionally, OSHRC
proposes amending § 2400.1 to reflect
that part 2400 applies only to ‘‘records
that are maintained by [OSHRC].’’
Presently, § 2400.1 states that OSHRC’s
Privacy Act regulations ‘‘are applicable
only to such items of information as
relate to the agency or are within its
custody.’’ However, the term ‘‘record’’ is
defined in the Privacy Act at 5 U.S.C.
552a(a)(4) while the term ‘‘items of
information’’ is not. Therefore,
amending § 2400.1 to substitute
‘‘record’’ for ‘‘items of information’’
would more appropriately limit the
purpose and scope of the regulations in
accordance with the statute. OSHRC
also proposes deleting the last sentence
of § 2400.1, which states ‘‘[t]his part is
intended to protect individual privacy,
and affects all personal information
collection and usage activity of the
agency,’’ because it is overly broad.
Based on these proposed amendments,
new § 2400.1 would read as follows:
The purpose of the provisions of this part
is to provide procedures to implement the
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a). This part
is applicable only to records that are
maintained by the Occupational Safety and
Health Review Commission (OSHRC or the
Commission), which includes all systems of
records operated on behalf of OSHRC,
pursuant to a contract, to accomplish an
agency function, except for records that are
disclosed to consumer reporting agencies
under section 3711(e) of title 31, United
States Code. This part is not applicable to the
rights of parties appearing in adversary
proceedings before the Commission to obtain
discovery from an adverse party. Such
matters are governed by the Commission’s
Rules of Procedure, which are published at
29 CFR 2200.1 et seq.
Revising § 2400.1 in this manner would
incorporate a statutory change to the
Privacy Act, as well as clarify the proper
scope of the agency’s regulations under
this Part.
In § 2400.2 (Description of agency),
OSHRC proposes adding a sentence to
the end of the section that provides
additional details about the designation
of one of the Commissioners as the
Chairman and his responsibilities for
the administrative operations of the
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 145 (Friday, July 28, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42778-42785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12067]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[USCBP-2006-0015]
19 CFR Parts 24, 113, and 128
RIN 1505-AB39
Fees for Customs Processing at Express Consignment Carrier
Facilities
AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection, Homeland Security; Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes amendments to title 19 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (19 CFR) to reflect changes to the customs user fee
statute made by section 337 of the Trade Act of 2002 and section
2004(f) of the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act of
2004. The statutory amendments made by section 337 concern the fees
payable for customs services provided in connection with the informal
entry or release of shipments at express consignment carrier facilities
and centralized hub facilities, and primarily serve to replace the
annual lump sum payment procedure with a quarterly payment procedure
based on a specific fee for each individual air waybill or bill of
lading. Section 2004(f) amended the user fee statute to authorize, for
merchandise that is formally entered at these sites, the assessment of
merchandise processing fees provided for in 19 U.S.C. 58c(a)(9), in
addition to the fees that are currently assessed on individual air
waybills or bills of lading. Lastly, pursuant to the authority
established in 19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(9)(B)(i), this document proposes to
raise the existing $0.66 fee assessed on individual air waybills or
bills of lading to $1.00 to more equitably align it with the actual
costs incurred by CBP in processing these items.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number, by one
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments via docket number
USCBP-2006-0015.
Mail: Trade and Commercial Regulations Branch, Office of
Regulations and Rulings, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, 1300
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. (Mint Annex), Washington, DC 20229.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the
``Public Participation'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the electronic docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
Submitted comments may also be inspected during regular business days
between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Office of Regulations
and Rulings, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, 799 9th Street,
NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC. Arrangements to inspect submitted
comments should be made in advance by calling Joseph Clark at (202)
572-8768.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael L. Jackson, Office of Field
Operations, Trade Enforcement and Facilitation, Tel.: (202) 344-1196.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or arguments on all aspects of the
proposed rule. The Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) also
invites comments that relate to the economic effects that might result
from this proposed rule. If appropriate to a specific comment, the
commenter should reference the specific portion of the proposed rule,
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include data,
information, or authority that support such recommended change.
Background
I. Statutory Changes Made by Section 337(a) of the Trade Act of 2002
On August 6, 2002, the President signed into law the Trade Act of
2002, Public Law 107-210, 116 Stat. 933. Section 337(a) of the Trade
Act of 2002 amended section 13031(b)(9) of the Consolidated Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(9)) by adding new
requirements for the payment of user fees for customs services provided
by CBP to express consignment carrier facilities and centralized hub
facilities in connection with imported letters, documents, shipments or
other merchandise to which informal entry procedures apply. The
principal changes involve the following:
1. In the introductory text of section 58c(b)(9)(A), which refers
to reimbursements and payments required from a centralized hub
facility, an express consignment carrier facility, or a small airport
or other facility, the words ``the processing of merchandise that is
informally entered or released'' were replaced by the words ``the
processing of letters, documents, records, shipments, merchandise, or
any other item that is valued at an amount that is less than $2,000 (or
such higher amount as the Secretary of the Treasury may set by
regulation pursuant to section 498 of the Tariff Act of 1930), except
such items entered for transportation and exportation or immediate
exportation.'' [It is noted that the statutory monetary amount was
subsequently amended to ``$2,000 or less * * *'' as discussed later in
this document.]
2. Section 58c(b)(9)(A)(ii) was replaced by new text identifying,
in the case of an express consignment carrier facility or a centralized
hub facility, a fee of $0.66 per individual air waybill or bill of
lading. Prior to this amendment, clause (ii) required an express
consignment carrier facility or a centralized hub facility to make the
following reimbursements and payments:
[[Page 42779]]
(a) A reimbursement to Customs (hereinafter referred to as ``CBP''
to reflect the transfer of the U.S. Customs Service to the Department
of Homeland Security and the agency's subsequent renaming as Bureau of
Customs and Border Protection) of an amount equal to the cost of the
services provided by CBP for the facility during the fiscal year; and
(b) An annual payment by the facility to the Secretary of the
Treasury in an amount equal to the annual reimbursement made under 19
U.S.C. 58c(b)(9)(A)(ii)(I).
3. Subparagraph (B) was redesignated as subparagraph (C) and a new
subparagraph (B) was added. New subparagraph (B) consists of clauses
(i) through (iii) which provide as follows:
(a) Clause (i) authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to adjust
the $0.66 fee prescribed in subparagraph (A)(i) to an amount that is
not less than $0.35 and not more than $1.00 per individual air waybill
or bill of lading. Clause (i) further provides that the adjustment may
not be made before fiscal year 2004 and not more than once per fiscal
year and must involve publication of notice of the proposed adjustment
in the Federal Register with opportunity for public comment;
(b) Clause (ii) provides that the payment required by subparagraph
(A)(ii) is the only payment required for reimbursement of CBP in
connection with the processing of an individual air waybill or bill of
lading in accordance with that subparagraph and for providing services
at express consignment carrier facilities or centralized hub
facilities, except that CBP may require those facilities to cover CBP
expenses for adequate office space, equipment, furnishings, supplies,
and security.
(c) Clause (iii)(I) provides that the payment required under
subparagraphs (A)(ii) and (B)(ii) is to be paid to CBP on a quarterly
basis by the carrier using the facility in accordance with regulations
prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. Clause (iii)(II) states
that 50 percent of the amount of payments received under subparagraphs
(A)(ii) and (B)(ii) will, in accordance with 19 U.S.C. 1524, be
deposited in the Customs (CBP) User Fee Account and used to directly
reimburse each appropriation for the amount paid out of that
appropriation for costs incurred in providing services to express
consignment carrier facilities or centralized hub facilities. Such
amounts are to remain available until expended for the provision of
customs services to these entities. Clause (iii)(III) directs the
remaining 50 percent of the amount of payments received under
subparagraphs (A)(ii) and (B)(ii) to be paid to the Secretary of the
Treasury. See 19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(9)(B)(iii)(I)--(III).
Section 337(b) of the Trade Act of 2002 provides that the
amendments made by section 337(a) take effect on October 1, 2002.
The following points are noted regarding the effect of the
statutory changes made by section 337(a) of the Trade Act of 2002:
1. The overall effect of section 337(a) is to replace two equal
annual lump sum payments (one representing a reimbursement of the cost
of services provided and the other representing a payment in lieu of
the payment of fees for the informal entry or release of merchandise)
with a quarterly payment procedure based on a specific fee for each
individual air waybill or bill of lading.
2. The $2,000 limit referred to in the amended statute reflects the
amount that CBP, pursuant to section 498 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1498), has adopted in Sec. 143.21 of title 19 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR 143.21) as the limit for
shipments of merchandise that may be entered under informal entry.
3. The replacement of the word ``merchandise'' by a reference to
``letters, documents, records, shipments, merchandise, or any other
item'' in the amended statute ensures that other imported articles or
items that are eligible for informal entry under Sec. 143.21 will be
subject to the new fee. The one exception concerns those articles (for
example, articles of plastics or rubber, textiles and textile articles,
leather articles, and footwear) for which the informal entry limit is
set at $250 in Sec. 143.21; for those articles having a value greater
than $250 but less than $2,000, the new fee standard will apply even
though those articles are not subject to informal entry procedures
under Sec. 143.21.
4. Each shipment transported by affected carriers is issued an
individual air waybill that is used, among other things, for tracking
purposes. Because the law applies the fee to each individual air
waybill, the use of master bills or other practices of consolidation or
convenience by these entities, the billing system used by these
entities for their customers, and the number of entries filed, are
irrelevant to the application of the fee. In effect, the individual air
waybill subject to the fee is the bill at the lowest level, i.e., not a
master bill. An example of an individual airway bill or bill of lading
is a bill representing an individual shipment that has its own unique
bill number and tracking number, where shipment is assigned to a single
ultimate consignee, and no lower (more disaggregated) bill unit exists.
5. Under the amended statute, responsibility for payment rests with
the carrier rather than with the facility. This does not represent a
substantive change in the case of centralized hub facilities because
the hub facility owner and the carrier using the facility are always
the same. However, it does represent a shift in responsibility for
payment, from the facility to the carrier, in the case of express
consignment carrier facilities that are not owned and operated by the
different carriers that use them.
6. The affected carriers became responsible for payment of the new
fee for each individual covered transaction as of October 1, 2002,
effective date of the amendments made by section 337(a) of the Trade
Act of 2002. Therefore, even though the first payment to CBP under the
new payment procedure would not have taken place until after the close
of the last quarter of the year 2002, the statute obligated the
affected carriers to maintain adequate records to determine the proper
amount to be paid starting on the effective date of the statutory
amendments.
II. Statutory Changes Made by Section 2004(f) of the Miscellaneous
Trade and Technical Corrections Act of 2004
The Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act of 2004
(``Trade Act of 2004'') was signed into law by the President on
December 3, 2004 (Pub. L. 108-429, 18 Stat. 2593). Section 2004(f) of
the Trade Act of 2004 made further amendments to section 13031(b)(9) of
the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C.
58c(b)(9)). The principal changes made by section 2004(f) are set forth
below:
1. In the introductory text of section 58c(b)(9)(A), which refers
to reimbursements and payments to CBP required from a centralized hub
facility, an express consignment carrier facility, or a small airport
or other facility, the words ``less than $2,000'' were replaced by the
words ``$2,000 or less''.
2. Section 58c(b)(9)(A)(ii), which requires an express consignment
carrier facility or a centralized hub facility to reimburse CBP in an
amount of $0.66 per individual air waybill or bill of lading, was
amended by: (a) Adding the language, ``[N]otwithstanding subsection
(e)(6)'' at the beginning of the section; and (b) restructuring this
provision by creating two new sub-clauses. The first new sub-clause,
identified as (A)(ii)(I), sets forth the existing reimbursement fee of
$0.66 per
[[Page 42780]]
individual air waybill or bill of lading. The second new sub-clause,
identified as (A)(ii)(II), pertains to situations where merchandise is
formally entered and mandates, in addition to the fee specified in sub-
clause (A)(ii)(I), reimbursement to CBP of the fee provided for in
subsection (a)(9) (the merchandise processing fee), if applicable. See
19 U.S.C. 58c(a)(9).
3. To accommodate the amendments to subparagraph (A)(ii), discussed
above, conforming changes were made to section 58c(b)(9)(B)(ii) whereby
the statutory reference to ``(A)(ii)'' was replaced with a reference to
``(A)(ii)(I) or (II)''.
III. Proposal To Increase Certain Reimbursement Fees Payable by Express
Consignment Carrier Facilities and Centralized Hub Facilities
As noted above, 19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(9)(B)(i), as amended by section
337(a) of the Trade Act of 2002, authorizes the Secretary of the
Treasury to adjust the $0.66 fee prescribed in 19 U.S.C.
58c(b)(9)(A)(ii) to an amount that is not less than $0.35 and not more
than $1.00 per individual air waybill or bill of lading. This section
further provides that notice of any proposed adjustment and the reasons
therefore must be published in the Federal Register with opportunity
for public comment.
Pursuant to this authority, this document proposes to increase the
existing $0.66 reimbursement fee payable to CBP by express consignment
carrier facilities and centralized carrier facilities to $1.00. The
proposed fee increase is necessary to more adequately reimburse CBP for
the actual costs incurred by the agency in processing individual air
waybills and bills of lading at these sites. It is also noted that in
addition to the regular costs associated with processing individual air
waybills and bills of lading, CBP must also incur the expenses
associated with relocating CBP personnel when a carrier opts to close a
carrier-owned express consignment facility and open a new facility at a
different location. The current fee schedule does not sufficiently
cover CBP's regular expenses at these sites.
As discussed previously, the amendments to section 58c(b)(9)(B)
made by section 337(a) of the Trade Act of 2002 direct that the money
collected by CBP from this one payment be sent to two different
accounts. Section 58c(b)(9)(B)(iii)(II) requires fifty percent of the
payment to be deposited in the CBP User Fee Account and used to
directly reimburse each appropriation for the amount paid out of that
appropriation for the costs incurred in providing services to express
consignment carrier facilities and centralized hub facilities. Such
amounts are available until expended for the provision of custom
services for these facilities. Section 58c(b)(9)(B)(iii)(III) requires
the remaining fifty percent to be paid to the Secretary of the Treasury
in lieu of an informal entry Merchandise Processing Fee (MPF). Prior to
the 2002 amendment, the law provided for two payments: One payment was
made to CBP as the fee to cover agency expenses incurred by providing
customs services relating to staffing for the onsite processing and
release of cargo at express consignment carrier facilities, and the
second payment was made to the Treasury in lieu of the informal entry
Merchandise Processing Fee (MPF). Thus, the current payment structure
provides for a single payment collected by CBP and deposited in two
separate sub-accounts, whereas previously two separate fees were paid
to CBP and Treasury. In neither case did fees exceed direct costs. In
fact, collected fees were well below direct costs. Under this proposal,
fees will approach costs up to the new statutory cap.
CBP has conducted a financial analysis of the costs incurred by CBP
in providing services to express consignment facilities and centralized
hub facilities in Fiscal Years (FY) 2004 and 2005. The collection/cost
data reveals that at the close of FY 2004, the half of the
58c(b)(9)(A)(ii) payment intended to defray the cost of services to
express consignment and centralized hub facilities left the agency with
a deficit with the agency collecting only 78% of the monies expended to
provide those services. In FY 2005, CBP collected only 70% of these
costs. Projections for FY 2006 indicate that the deficit will increase
again due to the fact that certain CBP expenses, such as reimbursable
wages for CBP employees at these sites, will increase.
The following table sets forth the collection/cost data associated
with CBP's processing of individual air waybills and bills of lading at
express consignment facilities and centralized hub facilities for FY
2004 and 2005, as well as a projected financial analysis for FY 2006:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total CBP's retained
Estimated collections portion of
Fiscal year package (based on $.66 collected amount CBP costs CBP cost CBP deficit
volume cents per (based on $.33 per bill
bill) cents per bill)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004*.......... 47,243,205 $31,180,516 $15,590,258...... $19,945,704 0.42 ($4,355,446).
2005*.......... 45,364,139 29,940,332 $14,970,166...... 21,393,520 0.47 ($6,423,354).
2006**......... 43,549,574 28,742,718 $14,371,359 22,545,880 0.52 ($8,174,521)
($21,774,787 (($771,093)
based on $.50 based on $.50
cents collected cents collected
per bill if the per bill if the
payment is payment is
raised to $1.00). raised to
$1.00).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* FY 2004 and 2005 costs information from the CBP Cost Management Information System.
** FY 2006 costs equal FY 2005 costs plus 27 new CBP Officer positions Grade 11 Step 1 with a prorated onboard
date of April 2006. New position cost information derived from the FY 2006 CBP position model and does not
include any equipment, training, travel costs, etc.
The financial projections for FY 2006 indicate that CBP will incur
a per bill cost of $0.52. If the payment is raised to $1.00, as
proposed, CBP will collect $0.50 per bill (the other $0.50 to be
deposited with the Secretary of the Treasury in lieu of the informal
entry Merchandise Processing Fee).
Based on these figures, and subject to the monetary limits set by
law, CBP proposes raising the $0.66 payment to $1.00 so that the half
of the payment associated with providing services to express
consignment and centralized hub facilities is aligned with the actual
costs incurred by CBP. The other half of the payment, collected in lieu
of the MPF, is set by statute at equal to the payment for providing
services to express consignment and centralized hub facilities.
Affected Regulatory Provisions
Regulations implementing those provisions of 19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(9)
that were amended by section 337(a) of the
[[Page 42781]]
Trade Act of 2002 and section 2004(f) of the Trade Act of 2004 are
contained in parts 24 and 128 of title 19 of the CFR (19 CFR parts 24
and 128).
Part 24 sets forth rules pertaining to CBP's financial and
accounting procedures. The provision within part 24 most directly
affected by the statutory changes discussed above is Sec. 24.23, which
concerns fees for processing merchandise and which, in paragraph
(b)(2)(ii), reflects the terms of subparagraph (A) of the statute prior
to its amendment by sections 337(a) and 2004(f). Also affected is Sec.
24.17, which provides for reimbursable services of CBP employees.
Specifically, paragraph (a)(12) of that section refers to reimbursement
of the compensation and expenses of a CBP employee assigned to a
centralized hub facility for the purpose of processing express
consignment shipments under part 128 of the regulations, and paragraph
(a)(13) contains a similar reimbursement reference regarding a CBP
employee assigned to an express consignment carrier facility, with the
facility being responsible for the reimbursement in each case.
Part 128 sets forth regulations that apply specifically to express
consignment carrier and hub facilities and their operators and users.
The only provision within part 128 that is directly affected by the
statutory changes discussed above is Sec. 128.11, which concerns the
express consignment carrier and hub facility application process.
Paragraphs (b)(7)(iv) and (v) of that section require the express
consignment entity to agree to timely pay all reimbursable costs and to
pay to CBP all relocation, training and other costs and expenses
incurred by CBP in relocating necessary staff to or from the facility.
This document proposes amendments to title 19 of the CFR to address
the statutory changes made by section 337(a) of the Trade Act of 2002
and 2004(f) of the Trade Act of 2004. In addition to the proposed
changes to parts 24 and 128 mentioned above, this document also
contains a proposed amendment to the CBP bond provisions of part 113 of
title 19 of the CFR (19 CFR part 113). The proposed changes to the
regulations contained in this document are discussed below.
Discussion of Proposed Amendments
Section 24.17
In this section, which includes in paragraph (a) a list of various
contexts in which parties-in-interest are required to reimburse CBP for
services rendered, it is proposed to remove paragraph (a)(12) (which
refers to services rendered at a centralized hub facility) and
paragraph (a)(13) (which refers to services rendered at an express
consignment carrier facility) and redesignate paragraph (a)(14) as
paragraph (a)(12).
The proposed removals are necessary because those two provisions:
(1) correspond to clause (ii) of subparagraph (A) of the statute as it
existed prior to the amendments made by sections 337(a) and 2004(f);
and (2) are inconsistent with the ``only payment required'' language in
clause (ii) of new subparagraph (B) of the statute.
Section 24.23
In this section, it is proposed to modify paragraph (b) to
incorporate the terms of the proposed $1.00 fee (increased from the
existing $0.66 fee) and paragraph (c) to include conforming cross-
reference changes. The following points are noted regarding the
proposed paragraph (b) changes:
1. In paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A), which concerns the 0.21 percent ad
valorem fee (merchandise processing fee) applicable to merchandise that
is formally entered or released, a new sentence is added with a cross-
reference to new paragraph (b)(4) to reflect the terms of section
2004(f) whereby, in the case of an express consignment carrier facility
or centralized hub facility, merchandise that is formally entered is
subject to a $1.00 per individual air waybill or bill of lading fee
and, if applicable, to a merchandise processing fee.
2. Paragraph (b)(2), which concerns fees for informal entry or
release, is revised to refer to only the $2, $6, and $9 specific fees
which, under the statute and the regulations, have never applied to
express consignment carrier facilities, centralized hub facilities, and
small airports and other facilities. The revised paragraph (b)(2) text
includes new exception language regarding merchandise covered by
paragraph (b)(3) or paragraph (b)(4).
3. A new paragraph (b)(3) concerning small airports and other
facilities is added. It is based on the relevant portion of current
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A) of Sec. 24.23 that is proposed to be removed
in the revision of paragraph (b)(2). The fee for small airports and
other facilities is authorized by 19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(9)(A)(i). The fee is
determined by application of 31 U.S.C. 9701. New paragraph (b)(3)
follows that statutory structure.
4. Paragraph (b)(4) is entirely new. Pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
58c(b)(9)(A)(ii)(I) and (II), as amended by sections 337(a) and
2004(f), paragraph (b)(4) requires each carrier using an express
consignment carrier facility or a centralized hub facility to pay to
CBP a fee (set forth in 19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(9)(A)(ii)(I) at $0.66 and now
proposed to be increased to $1.00, as discussed above) assessed on each
individual air waybill or individual bill of lading and, if merchandise
is formally entered, the 0.21 ad valorem fee, if applicable.
The assessment of this fee on each individual air waybill or bill
of lading means that each shipment transported by a carrier and
processed by CBP will be assessed the fee. Each shipment transported by
a carrier and processed by CBP is represented by an individual air
waybill and subject to the fee. Therefore, these proposed regulations
apply the fee to each shipment covered by an individual air waybill.
For purposes of these proposed regulations, an individual airway bill
is the bill at the lowest level, and would not include a master bill.
An example of an individual air waybill or bill of lading is a bill
representing an individual shipment that has its own unique bill number
and tracking number, where the shipment is assigned to a single
ultimate consignee, and no lower bill unit exists. The use of master
bills of lading, or other practices of consolidation by or for the
convenience of the carrier, or its customers or for any other reason is
irrelevant to the application of this user fee intended to cover CBP's
costs associated with processing each individual shipment as
represented by each individual air waybill or bill of lading. Moreover,
the number and kind of entries filed, and the carrier's billing system
for charging its customers, are irrelevant factors and are not
considered in determining the fee's application.
Paragraph (b)(4) also includes the quarterly payment requirement
specified in clause (iii) of new subparagraph (B) of the amended
statute. As in the case of paragraph (b)(3), discussed above, the text
of paragraph (b)(4) includes the ``processing of letters, documents * *
*'' and the ``$2,000 or less (or such higher amount * * *)'' language
of the introductory text of subparagraph (A) of the amended statute,
and also contains the exception reference regarding items entered for
transportation and exportation or immediate exportation that clearly is
relevant to the transaction-by-transaction assessment of the $1.00 fee.
The text of paragraph (b)(4) also proposes some additional
requirements and conditions regarding the payment of this fee, of which
the following points are noted:
[[Page 42782]]
1. In addition to identifying the due date for each timely
quarterly payment as well as the CBP address to which the payments must
be sent, the text sets forth specific information that must accompany
the payment. The specified information is necessary to enable CBP to
verify whether the proper amount of fees required under the statute has
been paid.
2. The text allows carriers to make adjustments of overpayments and
underpayments in the next quarterly payment, similar to what is allowed
in the case of railroad car and passenger arrival fees under Sec.
24.22(d) and (g) of the CBP regulations (19 CFR 24.22(d) and (g)).
However, if an adjustment is not made in the next quarterly payment, a
request for a refund of an overpayment must be made within one year,
similar to the practice in the case of harbor maintenance fees under
Sec. 24.24(e)(4)(ii) of the CBP regulations (19 CFR 24.24(e)(4)(ii)),
and interest will accrue in the case of an underpayment from the date
payment was initially due.
3. Paragraph (b)(4)(iv) provides that the underpayment or failure
of a carrier using an express consignment carrier facility or a
centralized hub facility to pay all applicable fees owed pursuant to
paragraph (b) may result in the assessment of penalties under 19 U.S.C.
1592 and any other action authorized by law.
Section 113.64
In this section, which specifies the international carrier bond
conditions, it is proposed to add a new sentence at the end of
paragraph (a) to refer to the obligation of the carrier and its surety
under the bond in the event that the carrier fails to pay the fees
required under Sec. 24.23(b)(4). This provision is modeled on the
approach taken in the case of quarterly payments of passenger
processing fees.
Section 128.11
In this section, which concerns the express consignment facility
application process, the following changes are proposed:
1. Paragraph (b)(2) is revised to require inclusion of a list of
users of the facility with the application if the applicant is an
express consignment carrier facility (a list of users is not necessary
in the case of a hub facility because the operator of the facility and
the user of the facility are one and the same). This information is
necessary to assist CBP in verifying proper payment of the statutory
fees.
2. Paragraphs (b)(7)(iv) and (b)(7)(v), which refer to elements of
the superseded statutory reimbursement concept, have been replaced with
new provisions. New paragraph (b)(7)(iv) provides for an agreement on
the part of an express consignment carrier facility to provide
quarterly, and update, a list of all carriers using the facility and is
intended to assist CBP in verifying the proper payment of fees by those
carriers. Paragraph (b)(7)(v) refers to an agreement on the part of a
hub facility or an express consignment carrier to timely pay all
applicable processing fees prescribed in Sec. 24.23.
Comments
Submitted comments will be available for public inspection in
accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and Sec.
103.11(b) of title 19 of the CFR (19 CFR 103.11(b)), on regular
business days between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Trade
and Commercial Regulations Branch, Office of Regulations and Rulings,
Customs and Border Protection, 799 9th St., NW., Washington, DC.
Arrangements to inspect submitted documents should be made in advance
by calling Joseph Clark at (202) 572-8768.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is not considered a ``significant regulatory action'' as
defined in E.O. 12866. Accordingly, a regulatory assessment is not
required.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
CBP has examined the impacts of the proposed rule on small entities
as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat.
1164, codified at 5 U.S.C. chapter 6) and has prepared an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis (IRFA). A small entity may be a
small business (defined as any independently owned and operated
business not dominant in its field that qualifies as a small business
per the Small Business Act); a small not-for-profit organization; or a
small governmental jurisdiction (locality with fewer than 50,000
people).
In this proposed rulemaking, small businesses are those that employ
fewer than 1,500 employees or have annual revenues under $6.5 million.
Based on annual data collected by CBP, there are 22 businesses that
will be affected by the proposed rule. Of these, 10 are large
businesses, 11 are small businesses, and 1 is a small, foreign-owned
business. Sixteen of these companies (both large and small) are members
of an association that owns and operates a consignment facility. That
association acts as a single respondent for its members.
Reason for Agency Action; Objectives of and Legal Basis for the
Proposed Rule
Pursuant to the authority established in 19 U.S.C.
58c(a)(9)(b)(ii), it is proposed to raise the existing $0.66 fee
assessed on individual air waybills or bills of lading to $1.00 to more
equitably align it with the actual costs incurred by CBP in processing
these items.
Number and Types of Small Entities to Which the Proposed Rule Will
Apply
As previously noted, there are 12 small businesses that will be
affected by the proposed rule. These companies are either courier
services (NAICS code 492110) or arrange freight transportation (NAICS
code 488510).
An estimated 91 percent of the bills of lading submitted for fee
assessment were from the three largest affected companies
(approximately 41 million waybills in FY 2005). The waybills from the
remaining large companies accounted for 2 percent (approximately
865,000 in FY 2005). The remaining 1.5 million bills of lading were
submitted by the 12 small businesses.
Based on data from FY 2003 to FY 2005, half of the large companies
have experienced annual increases in bills of lading; the remainder
have experienced annual decreases. Data for the 12 small businesses
also show increases and decreases in waybills. If current trends
continue, a net increase in waybills of approximately 20 percent
annually is projected for these small companies over the next several
years.
In FY 2005, the 12 small businesses submitted 1.5 million bills of
lading at a cost of $1.0 million ($0.66 per bill of lading). If, in FY
2006, 1.9 million bills of lading were submitted, this would result in
a cost of $1.3 million under the current fee structure. Under the
proposed fee of $1.00 per bill, we would expect costs to reach $1.9
million, a difference of $0.6 million. The $0.6 million represents only
4 percent of the total increase in fees CBP expects to be incurred as a
result of growth in bills of lading and the fee increase proposed in
this rule.
CBP collected annual revenue data for the 12 small businesses
affected. To determine the impact of the proposed rule on annual
revenues, CBP calculated the projected difference in costs between the
old and proposed fee and compared that (as a percentage) to average
annual revenues. Based on these calculations, CBP estimates that the
proposed rule will have a 5-percent impact or less on annual revenues
for 5 of the small businesses. The rule will have a 5 to 10-percent
impact on one of the companies and a greater than 10-
[[Page 42783]]
percent impact on four companies. CBP could not find data for one small
business, and one was foreign-owned.
In the course of CBP's examination of the impacts on annual
revenues for these small businesses, CBP has determined that these
entities will likely pass the cost of the increased fee on to their
customers to the extent that they are able.
On the basis of the foregoing analysis, CBP concludes that this
proposed rule could have a significant impact on a substantial number
of small entities. CBP is seeking comments on any of the regulatory
requirements that could minimize the cost to small businesses. Comments
may be submitted to the regulatory docket using any of the methods
listed under ``Comments'' or ADDRESSES above. All input received during
the public comment period will be considered.
Reporting and Recordkeeping
This proposed rule will change current paperwork requirements. No
new professional skills will be necessary for the preparations of the
reports and records. For more detail, see ``Paperwork Reduction Act''
below.
Other Federal Rules
This proposed rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
other federal regulations.
Regulatory Alternatives
CBP did not consider any alternatives to the proposed rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collections of information in this document are contained in
Sec. Sec. 24.23 and 128.11 (19 CFR 24.23 and 128.11). This information
is used by CBP to determine whether user fees required by statute have
been properly paid. The likely respondents are business organizations
including importers and air carriers.
The collections of information for paying fees for customs services
provided in connection with the informal entry or release of shipments
at express consignment carrier facilities and centralized hub
facilities was previously approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 1651-0052. In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507), CBP has submitted to OMB for
review the following adjustments to the information provided to OMB for
the previously approved OMB control number to account for the changes
proposed in this rule. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid control number assigned by OMB.
Report for quarterly payment under Sec. 24.23(b)(4)(ii):
Estimated annual reporting and/or recordkeeping burden: 176 hours.
Estimated average annual burden per respondent/recordkeeper: 8
hours.
Estimated number of respondents and/or recordkeepers: 22.
Estimated annual frequency of responses: 4.
Report for refund of overpayment under Sec. 24.23(b)(4)(iii):
Estimated annual reporting and/or recordkeeping burden: 5 hours.
Estimated average annual burden per respondent/recordkeeper: 1
hour.
Estimated number of respondents and/or recordkeepers: 5.
Estimated annual frequency of responses: 2.
Report by operators including the list of carriers under Sec.
128.11(b):
Estimated annual reporting and/or recordkeeping burden: 6 hours.
Estimated average annual burden per respondent/recordkeeper: 2
hours.
Estimated number of respondents and/or recordkeepers: 3.
Estimated annual frequency of responses: 4.
Comments on the collection of information should be sent to the
Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of Homeland Security, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Washington, DC 20503. A copy should also be sent to the
Regulations Branch, Office of Regulations and Rulings, Customs and
Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. (Mint Annex),
Washington, DC 20229. Comments should be submitted within the time
frame that comments are due regarding the substance of the proposal.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the
accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of
the information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology; and (e) estimates of capital or startup costs and costs of
operations, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide
information.
Signing Authority
This document is being issued in accordance with Sec. 0.1(a)(1) of
the CBP regulations (19 CFR 0.1(a)(1)) pertaining to the authority of
the Secretary of the Treasury (or his/her delegate) to approve
regulations related to certain CBP revenue functions.
List of Subjects
19 CFR Part 24
Accounting, Claims, Customs duties and inspection, Exports,
Imports, Interest, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Taxes,
User fees, Wages.
19 CFR Part 113
Air carriers, Bonds, Customs duties and inspection, Exports,
Freight, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Surety
bonds.
19 CFR Part 128
Administrative practice and procedure, Carriers, Couriers, Customs
duties and inspection, Entry, Express consignments, Freight, Imports,
Informal entry procedures, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, parts 24, 113, and 128
of title 19 of the CFR (19 CFR parts 24, 113, and 128), are proposed to
be amended as set forth below.
PART 24--CUSTOMS FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING PROCEDURE
1. The authority citation for part 24 continues to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 58a-58c, 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1505,
1520, 1624; 26 U.S.C. 4461, 4462; 31 U.S.C. 9701; Public Law 107-
296, 116 Stat. 2135 (6 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).
* * * * *
Section 24.17 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 261, 267, 1450, 1451,
1452, 1456, 1524, 1557, 1562; 46 U.S.C. 2110, 2111, 2112; Section
24.23 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 3332;
* * * * *
2. In Sec. 24.17:
a. The section heading is revised to read as set forth below;
b. Paragraphs (a) through (d) are amended by removing the words
``Customs employee'' where they appear and adding in each place the
term ``CBP employee; and
c. Paragraphs (a)(12) and (a)(13) are removed and paragraph (a)(14)
is redesignated as paragraph (a)(12).
Sec. 24.17 Reimbursable services of CBP employees.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 24.23:
a. Paragraph (a) is amended by removing the word ``Customs'' each
[[Page 42784]]
place that it appears and adding the term ``CBP'';
b. Paragraphs (b)(1)(i)(A) and paragraph (b)(2) are revised;
c. New paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) are added;
d. The introductory text of paragraph (c)(1) is amended by removing
the reference ``(b)(2)(i)'' and adding, in its place, the reference
``(b)(2)'';
e. Paragraph (c)(2)(i) is amended by removing the reference
``(b)(2)(i)'' and adding, in its place, the reference ``(b)(2)'';
f. The first sentence of paragraph (c)(3) is amended by removing
the reference ``(b)(2)(i)'' and adding, in its place, the reference
``(b)(2)''; and
g. Paragraph (c)(5) is amended by removing the reference
``(b)(2)(i)'' and adding, in its place, the reference ``(b)(2)''.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 24.23 Fees for processing merchandise.
* * * * *
(b) Fees (1) Formal entry or release (i) Ad valorem fee (A)
General. Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section,
merchandise that is formally entered or released is subject to the
payment to CBP of an ad valorem fee of 0.21 percent. The 0.21 ad
valorem fee is due and payable to CBP by the importer of record of the
merchandise at the time of presentation of the entry summary and is
based on the value of the merchandise as determined under 19 U.S.C.
1401a. In the case of an express consignment carrier facility or
centralized hub facility, merchandise that is formally entered is
subject to a $1.00 per individual air waybill or bill of lading fee
and, if applicable, to the 0.21 percent ad valorem fee which must be
paid by the carrier as provided in paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
* * * * *
(2) Informal entry or release. Except in the case of merchandise
covered by paragraph (b)(3) or paragraph (b)(4) of this section, and
except as otherwise provided in paragraph (c) of this section,
merchandise that is informally entered or released is subject to the
payment to CBP of a fee of:
(i) $2 if the entry or release is automated and not prepared by CBP
personnel;
(ii) $6 if the entry or release is manual and not prepared by CBP
personnel; or
(iii) $9 if the entry or release, whether automated or manual, is
prepared by CBP personnel.
(3) Small airport or other facility. With respect to the processing
of letters, documents, records, shipments, merchandise, or any other
item that is valued at $2,000 or less, or any higher amount prescribed
for purposes of informal entry in Sec. 143.21 of this chapter, a small
airport or other facility must pay to CBP an amount equal to the
reimbursement (including overtime) which the facility is required to
make during the fiscal year under Sec. 24.17.
(4) Express consignment carrier and centralized hub facilities.
Each carrier using an express consignment carrier facility or a
centralized hub facility must pay to CBP a fee in the amount of $1.00
per individual air waybill or individual bill of lading and, if
merchandise is formally entered, the ad valorem fee specified in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, if applicable. An individual air
waybill or individual bill of lading is the individual document issued
by the carrier for transporting and/or tracking an individual item,
letter, package, envelope, record, document, or shipment. An individual
air waybill is the bill at the lowest level, and is not a master bill
or other consolidated document. An individual air waybill or bill of
lading is a bill representing an individual shipment that has its own
unique bill number and tracking number, where the shipment is assigned
to a single ultimate consignee, and no lower bill unit exists. Payment
must be made to CBP on a quarterly basis and must cover the individual
fees for all subject transactions that occurred during a calendar
quarter. The following additional requirements and conditions apply to
each quarterly payment made under this section:
(i) The quarterly payment must conform to the requirements of Sec.
24.1, must be mailed to Customs and Border Protection, Revenue
Division/Attention: Reimbursables, 6650 Telecom Drive, Suite 100,
Indianapolis, Indiana 46278, and must be received by CBP no later than
the last day of the month that follows the close of the calendar
quarter to which the payment relates.
(ii) The following information must be included with the quarterly
payment:
(A) The identity of the calendar quarter to which the payment
relates;
(B) The identity of the facility for which the payment is made and
the port code that applies to that location and, if the payment covers
multiple facilities, the identity of each facility and its port code
and the portion of the payment that pertains to each port code; and
(C) The total number of individual air waybills and individual
bills of lading covered by the payment, and a breakdown of that total
for each facility covered by the payment according to the number
covered by formal entry procedures, the number covered by informal
entry procedures specified in Sec. Sec. 128.24(e) and 143.23(j) of
this chapter, and the number covered by other informal entry
procedures.
(iii) Overpayments or underpayments may be accounted for by an
explanation in, and adjustment of, the next due quarterly payment to
CBP. In the case of an overpayment or underpayment that is not
accounted for by an adjustment of the next due quarterly payment to
CBP:
(A) In the case of an overpayment, the carrier may request a refund
by writing to Customs and Border Protection, Revenue Division/
Attention: Reimbursables, 6650 Telecom Drive, Suite 100, Indianapolis,
Indiana 46278. The refund request must specify the grounds for the
refund and must be received by CBP within one year of the date the fee
for which the refund is sought was paid to CBP; and
(B) In the case of an underpayment, interest will accrue on the
amount not paid from the date payment was initially due to the date
that payment to CBP is made.
(iv) The underpayment or failure of a carrier using an express
consignment carrier facility or a centralized hub facility to pay all
applicable fees owed to CBP pursuant to paragraph (b)(4) of this
section may result in the assessment of penalties under 19 U.S.C. 1592
and any other action authorized by law.
* * * * *
PART 113--CUSTOMS BONDS
4. The authority citation for part 113 continues to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1623, 1624.
* * * * *
5. In Sec. 113.64, paragraph (a) is amended by adding a new
sentence at the end to read as follows:
Sec. 113.64 International carrier bond conditions.
* * * * *
(a) * * * If the principal (carrier) fails to pay the fees for
processing letters, documents, records, shipments, merchandise, or
other items on or before the last day of the month that follows the
close of the calendar quarter to which the processing fees relate
pursuant to Sec. 24.23(b)(4) of this chapter, the obligors (principal
and surety, jointly and severally) agree to pay liquidated damages
equal to two times the processing fees not timely paid to CBP as
prescribed by regulation.
* * * * *
PART 128--EXPRESS CONSIGNMENTS
6. The authority citation for part 128 is revised to read as
follows:
[[Page 42785]]
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 58c, 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i),
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1321, 1484, 1498,
1551, 1555, 1556, 1565, 1624.
7. In Sec. 128.11, paragraphs (b)(2), (b)(7)(iv) and (b)(7)(v) are
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 128.11 Express consignment carrier application process.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) A statement of the general character of the express consignment
operations that includes, in the case of an express consignment carrier
facility, a list of carriers that intend to use the facility.
* * * * *
(7) * * *
(iv) If the entity is an express consignment carrier facility,
provide to Customs and Border Protection, Revenue Division/Attention:
Reimbursables, 6650 Telecom Drive, Suite 100, Indianapolis, Indiana
46278, at the beginning of each calendar quarter, a list of all
carriers currently using the facility and notify that office whenever a
new carrier begins to use the facility or whenever a carrier ceases to
use the facility.
(v) If the entity is a hub facility or an express consignment
carrier, timely pay all applicable processing fees prescribed in Sec.
24.23 of this chapter.
* * * * *
Deborah J. Spero,
Acting Commissioner, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection.
Approved: July 24, 2006.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. E6-12067 Filed 7-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P