Federal Acquisition Regulation; Information Collection; Summary Subcontract Report, 42838 [06-6528]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
42838
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 145 / Friday, July 28, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0007]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Information Collection; Summary
Subcontract Report
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for comments
regarding an extension to an existing
OMB clearance (9000–0007).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Secretariat will be submitting to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve
an extension of a currently approved
information collection requirement
concerning summary subcontract report.
The OMB clearance currently expires on
October 31, 2006.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the FAR,
and whether it will have practical
utility; whether our estimate of the
public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on
valid assumptions and methodology;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, through the use of appropriate
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
September 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of the collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this
burden to the General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(VIR), 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035,
Washington, DC 20405.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rhonda Cundiff, Contract Policy
Division, GSA, (202) 501–0044.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
In accordance with the Small
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631, et seq.),
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:17 Jul 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
contractors receiving a contract for more
than $10,000 agree to have small and
small disadvantaged business concerns
participate in the performance of the
contract as far as practicable.
Contractors receiving a contract or a
modification to a contract expected to
exceed $500,000 ($1 million for
construction) must submit a
subcontracting plan that provides
maximum practicable opportunities for
small and small disadvantaged business
concerns. Specific elements required to
be included in the plan are specified in
section 8(d) of the Small Business Act
and are implemented in FAR Subpart
19.7.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Number of Respondents: 4,253.
Responses Per Respondent: 1.66.
Total Responses: 7,098.
Average Burden Hours Per Response:
15.90.
Total Burden Hours: 112,864.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat (VIR), Room
4035, Washington, DC 20405, telephone
(202) 501–4755. Please cite OMB
Control Number 9000–0007, Summary
Subcontract Report, in all
correspondence.
Dated: July 24, 2006.
Ralph De Stefano,
Director, Contract Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 06–6528 Filed 7–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (Eis)
for the Implementation of the Base
Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 2005
Decisions and Related Actions at Eglin
Air Force Base (AFB), FL
AGENCY:
Department of the Air Force,
DOD.
ACTION:
Notice of intent.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended (42 United States
Code 4321, et seq.), the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
implementing procedural provisions of
NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulation
(CFR) Parts 1500–1508), and Air Force
policy and procedures (32 CFR Part
989), the Air Force is issuing this notice
to advise the public of its intent to
prepare an EIS evaluating potential
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
environmental impacts associated with
implementation of the 2005 BRAC
Commission’s recommendations and
related actions for Eglin AFB, FL.
The 2005 BRAC Commission
identified establishment of a Joint Strike
Fighter (JSF) Integrated Training Center
(ITC), relocation of the Army 7th
Special Forces Group (Airborne)
[7SFG(A)] from Fort Bragg, North
Carolina, and creating an Air Integrated
Weapons and Armaments Research,
Development and Acquisition, Test and
Evaluation Center by relocating the
Weapons and Armaments In-Service
Engineering Research, Development and
Acquisition, and Test and Evaluation
from Hill AFB, UT and the Defense
Threat Reduction Agency from Fort
Belvoir, VA to Eglin AFB. The JSF ITC
would be the initial training site for
joint Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps
JSF training organizations, as well as the
United Kingdom, which is a full partner
in this program. The training site would
teach aviators and maintenance
technicians how to properly operate and
maintain 107 F–35 aircraft. As part of
this action, F–35 basing, facility
construction and renovation, on-site
maintenance and use of training
airspace are being analyzed. The 7SFG
(A)’s principal mission includes
planning and executing unconventional
warfare, combating terrorism operations,
direct action, special reconnaissance,
and foreign internal defense. Their
realignment to Eglin provides multiservice collocation, joint training
synergy with Air Force Special
Operations Command and places
7SFG(A) on training lands that match
their wartime area of responsibility in
Central and South America.
Approximately 4,600 personnel are
associated with the bed down of both
organizations. When including spouses
and children, the estimated total of
personnel coming to the Eglin AFB area
would be 10,000 people. As part of this
action, the Air Force is considering
various alternatives for facility
construction and renovation, land range
development, equipment storage and
operation, and land-based training/
maneuvering to be analyzed in the EIS.
The EIS may also include within its
scope the potential environmental
effects associated with socioeconomics,
transportation, noise, cultural resources,
water resources, wetlands, floodplains,
air quality, land use, infrastructure, and
biological resources. The Air Force will
conduct scoping meetings to solicit
public input concerning this proposal.
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 145 (Friday, July 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 42838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6528]
[[Page 42838]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000-0007]
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Information Collection; Summary
Subcontract Report
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for comments regarding an extension to an
existing OMB clearance (9000-0007).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Secretariat will be submitting to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve an extension of a currently
approved information collection requirement concerning summary
subcontract report. The OMB clearance currently expires on October 31,
2006.
Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
functions of the FAR, and whether it will have practical utility;
whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways in which we can minimize the
burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond,
through the use of appropriate technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Submit comments on or before September 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding this burden estimate or any other
aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for
reducing this burden to the General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (VIR), 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035, Washington, DC 20405.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rhonda Cundiff, Contract Policy
Division, GSA, (202) 501-0044.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
In accordance with the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631, et seq.),
contractors receiving a contract for more than $10,000 agree to have
small and small disadvantaged business concerns participate in the
performance of the contract as far as practicable. Contractors
receiving a contract or a modification to a contract expected to exceed
$500,000 ($1 million for construction) must submit a subcontracting
plan that provides maximum practicable opportunities for small and
small disadvantaged business concerns. Specific elements required to be
included in the plan are specified in section 8(d) of the Small
Business Act and are implemented in FAR Subpart 19.7.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Number of Respondents: 4,253.
Responses Per Respondent: 1.66.
Total Responses: 7,098.
Average Burden Hours Per Response: 15.90.
Total Burden Hours: 112,864.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from the General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (VIR), Room 4035, Washington, DC
20405, telephone (202) 501-4755. Please cite OMB Control Number 9000-
0007, Summary Subcontract Report, in all correspondence.
Dated: July 24, 2006.
Ralph De Stefano,
Director, Contract Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 06-6528 Filed 7-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-S
