TSCA Section 21 Petition; Response to Citizen's Petition, 42640-42642 [E6-12044]
Download as PDF
42640
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 144 / Thursday, July 27, 2006 / Notices
Dated: July 19, 2006.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E6–12052 Filed 7–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2006–0397; FRL–8079–7]
TSCA Section 21 Petition; Response to
Citizen’s Petition
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On April 21, 2006, the Sierra
Club petitioned EPA under section 21 of
the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA) to take four actions under TSCA
to mitigate risks from lead in toy
jewelry. The petitioner requested that
EPA: (1) Require TSCA section 8(d)
health and safety data reporting; (2)
submit a report to the Consumer
Product Safety Commission (CPSC)
under TSCA section 9; (3) issue a
significant new use rule pursuant to
TSCA section 5(a); and (4) issue quality
control orders under TSCA section 6(b).
Of the actions requested by the
petitioner, TSCA section 21 applies only
to the requests for actions under TSCA
sections 6(b) and 8(d). For the reasons
set forth in this notice, EPA has denied
the petition to initiate rulemaking under
these two sections.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator,
Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 554–1404; e-mail
address:TSCA-Hotline&epa.gov.
For technical information contact:
Doreen Cantor, National Program
Chemicals Division (7404T), Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(202) 566–0486; e-mail address:
cantor.doreen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me
You may potentially be affected by
this action if you manufacture, import,
or distribute in commerce toy jewelry
containing lead, or if you manufacture,
import, process, or distribute in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Jul 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
commerce lead. Potentially affected
entities may include, but are not limited
to:
• (NAICS code 339914) Costume
jewelry and novelty manufacturing
• (NAICS code 339932) Game, toy,
and children’s vehicle manufacturing
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding some of the
entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed
in this unit could also be affected. The
North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes
have been provided to assist you and
others in determining whether this
action might apply to certain entities. If
you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the technical
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Copies of this
Document and Other Related
Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification number EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2006–0397. The docket is available for
public viewing at the EPA Docket
Center, Rm. B102, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA
Docket Center is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The EPA
Docket Center Public Reading Room
telephone number is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPPT
Docket is (202) 566–0280.
2. Electronic access. You may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the Federal Register listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
Publicly available docket materials
are available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the OPPT docket.
II. Background
A. What is a TSCA Section 21 Petition
Section 21 of TSCA allows citizens to
petition EPA to initiate a proceeding for
the issuance, amendment, or repeal of a
rule under TSCA section 4, 6, or 8 or an
order under section 5(e) or 6(b)(2). A
TSCA section 21 petition must set forth
facts that the petitioner believes
establish the need for the action
requested. EPA is required to grant or
deny the petition within 90 days of its
filing. If EPA grants the petition, the
Agency must promptly commence an
appropriate proceeding. If EPA denies
the petition, the Agency must publish
its reasons for the denial in the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Register. Within 60 days of denial, or
the expiration of the 90–day period, if
no action is taken, the petitioners may
commence a civil action in a U.S.
district court to compel initiation of the
requested rulemaking proceeding.
B. What Action is Requested Under this
TSCA Section 21 Petition?
On April 21, 2006, the Sierra Club
petitioned EPA to take four actions
intended to reduce risks from toy
jewelry containing lead. The Sierra Club
defines toy jewelry as any item that
serves a decorative but no or minimal
functional purpose that is valued at less
than $20 per item. The requested
actions are:
• Require TSCA section 8(d) health
and safety data reporting for lead and
lead salts.
• Submit a TSCA section 9 report to
CPSC regarding lead and lead salts.
• Issue a TSCA section 5(a)
significant new use rule regarding lead
and lead salts in toy jewelry.
• Issue TSCA section 6(b) quality
control orders regarding production of
toy jewelry.
The petition also requested certain
actions by CPSC.
Again, of the actions requested by the
petitioner, TSCA section 21 applies only
to actions under TSCA sections 6(b) and
8(d), and these requests are addressed in
this notice.
III. Disposition of Petition
EPA does not believe that the actions
requested by the petitioner under TSCA
sections 6(b) and 8(d) would be helpful
in addressing the problem presented by
lead in toy jewelry, at this time. These
two requests are therefore denied. The
other two requests, for actions under
TSCA sections 5(a) and 9, are not
petitionable under TSCA section 21.
Section 21 enumerates specific sections
and subsections of TSCA under which
any person may petition the
Administrator to initiate a proceeding
for the issuance, amendment, or repeal
of a rule or an order. Sections 5(a) and
9 are not included.
A. Request to Issue Section 6(b) Quality
Control Order Regarding Production of
Toy Jewelry
EPA does not believe that section 6(b)
is an appropriate tool to address the
risks associated with lead in toy jewelry
at this time. The use of section 6(b)
would be most beneficial when the
Agency can identify a small number of
companies who, by their unique actions,
are causing unreasonable risks to be
present. In the case at hand, EPA
believes that this approach may be
inadequate and inefficient. Information
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 144 / Thursday, July 27, 2006 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
contained in several of the public
comments suggests that there may be
numerous instances where toy jewelry
containing lead is still available in the
marketplace. EPA is working in
coordination with CPSC to understand
the scope of the problem. A holistic and
proactive approach may be more
effective and less resource intensive
than the case-by-case approach
provided for under section 6(b).
Where the Administrator has a
reasonable basis to conclude that a
particular manufacturer or processor is
manufacturing or processing a chemical
substance or mixture in a manner which
unintentionally causes the chemical
substance or mixture to present an
unreasonable risk, TSCA section 6(b)(1)
allows the Administrator to require the
manufacturer or processor to provide
information regarding the relevant
quality control procedures followed in
the manufacturing or processing. If the
Administrator then determines such
procedures are inadequate, TSCA
section 6(b)(2) allows the Administrator
to require the manufacturer or processor
to revise its procedures. EPA notes that
only orders under section 6(b)(2) are
subject to TSCA section 21. The request
contained in this petition is for orders
to remedy quality control procedures
where necessary (section 6(b)(2)).
However, EPA is not in a position to
issue such orders at this time because it
has not issued any section 6(b)(1) orders
that could provide the basis for section
6(b)(2) orders.
The request that EPA identify and
issue section 6(b) orders to all
manufacturers and processors
producing toy jewelry with greater than
0.06% lead is therefore denied.
However, EPA is not foreclosing the
possibility of issuing section 6(b) orders
in the future should it conclude that
section 6(b) is an appropriate tool to
address risks presented by particular
manufacturers or processors.
possession of voluminous information
on the health hazards of lead, and has
undertaken numerous rulemakings and
other actions based on this information.
Along with the rest of the federal
government and many other bodies, the
Agency has concluded that lead can
cause multiple adverse health effects,
and has set a goal to eliminate lead
poisoning as a major health concern in
children by 2010. While the Agency is
always open to the receipt of additional
information on the health and safety of
various substances, it believes that the
health effects of lead are already wellknown and accepted. Over the course of
EPA’s many rulemaking and policy
development efforts to address lead
risks to children, including numerous
notice and comment proceedings,
public meetings, and other fora for
exchange of information, EPA believes
that it has assessed the most critical
existing lead health and safety studies
that EPA and/or CPSC would find most
valuable for regulatory purposes.
While it is possible some new
information could be obtained from a
section 8(d) rule, EPA does not consider
it likely that it would gain significant
new information through a section 8(d)
rule requiring the types of studies
identified by the petitioner. In addition,
it is not clear that EPA has authority to
obtain under section 8(d) all of the
information identified by the petitioner
(e.g., information on marketing and
patterns of use).
For the reasons described above, EPA
does not believe, at this time, that the
requested section 8(d) rule would be
helpful in assessing the risks to children
from lead in toy jewelry and is, thus,
denying this request. However, EPA is
continuing to work with CPSC, and
would consider doing a targeted section
8(d) rule should EPA conclude in the
future that it has a need for specific
information that could likely be
obtained through this mechanism.
B. Request to Require TSCA Section 8(d)
Health and Safety Data Reporting for
Lead and Lead Salts
TSCA section 8(d) authorizes the
Agency to promulgate rules requiring
that manufacturers, processors, and
distributors of chemical substances or
mixtures submit lists and copies of such
health and safety studies to the
Administrator. While this could allow
the Agency to require the submission of
health and safety studies on lead and
lead salts, the Agency does not believe
that a section 8(d) rule would provide
useful information, at this time.
Extensive and detailed information on
the toxicity of lead is already widely
available. The Agency is already in
IV. Related Issues
After receiving this petition, EPA
published a notice in theFederal
Register soliciting comments and
further information on the issues
associated with lead in toy jewelry (71
FR 30921, May 31, 2006) (FRL–8069–3).
EPA has carefully assessed this
information, along with the information
provided in the petition, and will
continue to evaluate this information
and conduct additional analyses to
better understand the scope and severity
of this issue.
Despite EPA’s reservations about the
specific approaches requested in this
petition, the Agency is concerned about
the continuing use of lead in toy jewelry
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jul 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42641
and is working with CPSC to develop
the most effective means to address this
issue. The two Agencies have met four
times since receiving this petition and
have established an interagency group
to identify the most effective steps to
move forward. In the short-term, EPA
will work with CPSC to examine
approaches to outreach to retailers.
V. Comments Received
EPA received 10 comments in
response to the Federal Register notice
published May 31, 2006 (71 FR 30921),
announcing EPA’s receipt of this TSCA
section 21 petition.
Five comments were received from
state and municipal governmental
agencies (Chicago, Minnesota,
Minneapolis/Hennepin County, New
York State, and Illinois), all of which
strongly supported the petition. Several
of these comments included survey data
and anecdotal information showing that
toy jewelry containing lead is available
and causes moderate to severe health
effects. These comments stressed the
need for Federal action to eliminate lead
from toy jewelry. Several comments also
stressed that Federal action is needed to
eliminate lead from other consumer and
children’s products as well.
Four comments were received from
other sources (a private citizen, the
Regulated Community Compliance
Project of Boston University, the Coastal
Health District, and Kids in Danger)
which were also supportive of the
petition, describing health risks to
children from lead in toy jewelry. These
comments did not include additional
data, except that one (from Kids In
Danger) included its 2004 report
‘‘Playing With Poison: Lead Poisoning
Hazards of Children’s Products, 19902004’’). These comments also urged
federal action to eliminate lead in toy
jewelry and in other products.
One trade association (the Association
of Battery Recyclers (ABR)) submitted
comments. This commenter opposed the
petition for the TSCA section 8(d)
request, on the bases that the petitioner
had not identified benefits to be derived
from the use of section 8(d), had not
demonstrated why EPA action is needed
given CPSC programs, and was overly
broad. The comment also opposed the
TSCA section 9 request on the basis of
being overly broad. This commenter had
no comment on the requests for action
under TSCA sections 5(a) and 6(b).
EPA has considered these comments
in responding to the petition.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, lead,
children’s health.
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
42642
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 144 / Thursday, July 27, 2006 / Notices
Dated: July 20, 2006.
James B. Gilliford
Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
[FR Doc. E6–12044 Filed 7–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Notices
Tuesday, August 1, 2006
at 10:00 a.m.
PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington,
DC.
STATUS: This meeting will be closed to
the public.
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
Compliance matters pursuant to 2
U.S.C. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2
U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in
civil actions or proceedings or
arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and
procedures or matters affecting a
particular employee.
DATE AND TIME: Thursday, August 3,
2006 at 10 a.m.
PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington,
DC (Ninth Floor).
STATUS: This meeting will be open to
the public.
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: Correction and
Approval of Minutes.
Final Audit Report—2004 Democratic
National Convention Committee, Inc.
(DNCC).
Routine Administrative Matters.
DATE AND TIME:
PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:
Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer.
Telephone: (202) 694–1220.
Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06–6565 Filed 7–25–06; 2:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715–01–M
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisition of Shares of Bank or Bank
Holding Companies
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank
holding company. The factors that are
considered in acting on the notices are
set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12
U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The notices are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jul 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices
also will be available for inspection at
the office of the Board of Governors.
Interested persons may express their
views in writing to the Reserve Bank
indicated for that notice or to the offices
of the Board of Governors. Comments
must be received not later than August
11, 2006.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of
Richmond (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice
President) 701 East Byrd Street,
Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
1. Richard Jarrell, Freda Jarrell, Carol
Jarrell, Robert Jarrell, and Robin Jarrell,
all of Whitesville, West Virginia; as a
group acting in concert to retain voting
shares of Big Coal River Bancorp, Inc.,
Whitesville, West Virginia, and thereby
indirectly retain voting shares of
Whitesville State Bank, Whitesville,
West Virginia.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, July 24, 2006.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E6–12011 Filed 7–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The application also will be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Additional information on all bank
holding companies may be obtained
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
from the National Information Center
Web site at https://www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than August 21,
2006.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King,
Community Affairs Officer) 90
Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55480-0291:
1. TCF Financial Corporation,
Wayzata, Minnesota; to acquire 100
percent of the voting shares of TCF
National Bank Arizona, Mesa, Arizona,
a de novo bank.
B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas
City (Donna J. Ward, Assistant Vice
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas
City, Missouri 64198-0001:
1. First Liberty Holdings, LLC,
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; to become a
bank holding company by acquiring 100
percent of the voting shares of Hazelton
Bancshares, Inc., Hazelton, Kansas; and
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares
of The Farmers State Bank, Meno,
Oklahoma.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, July 24, 2006.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E6–12012 Filed 7–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Federal Open Market Committee;
Domestic Policy Directive of June 28–
29, 2006
In accordance with § 271.25 of its
rules regarding availability of
information (12 CFR part 271), there is
set forth below the domestic policy
directive issued by the Federal Open
Market Committee at its meeting held
on June 28–29, 2006.1
The Federal Open Market Committee
seeks monetary and financial conditions
that will foster price stability and
promote sustainable growth in output.
To further its long-run objectives, the
Committee in the immediate future
seeks conditions in reserve markets
consistent with increasing the federal
funds rate to an average of around 51⁄4
percent.
1 Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open
Market Committee Meeting on June 28–29, 2006,
which includes the domestic policy directive issued
at the meeting, are available upon request to the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
Washington, DC 20551. The minutes are published
in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board’s
annual report.
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 144 (Thursday, July 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42640-42642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12044]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0397; FRL-8079-7]
TSCA Section 21 Petition; Response to Citizen's Petition
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On April 21, 2006, the Sierra Club petitioned EPA under
section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to take four
actions under TSCA to mitigate risks from lead in toy jewelry. The
petitioner requested that EPA: (1) Require TSCA section 8(d) health and
safety data reporting; (2) submit a report to the Consumer Product
Safety Commission (CPSC) under TSCA section 9; (3) issue a significant
new use rule pursuant to TSCA section 5(a); and (4) issue quality
control orders under TSCA section 6(b). Of the actions requested by the
petitioner, TSCA section 21 applies only to the requests for actions
under TSCA sections 6(b) and 8(d). For the reasons set forth in this
notice, EPA has denied the petition to initiate rulemaking under these
two sections.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator, Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (202) 554-1404; e-mail address:TSCA-
Hotline&epa.gov.
For technical information contact: Doreen Cantor, National Program
Chemicals Division (7404T), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 566-0486; e-mail
address: cantor.doreen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me
You may potentially be affected by this action if you manufacture,
import, or distribute in commerce toy jewelry containing lead, or if
you manufacture, import, process, or distribute in commerce lead.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
(NAICS code 339914) Costume jewelry and novelty
manufacturing
(NAICS code 339932) Game, toy, and children's vehicle
manufacturing
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding some of the entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this
unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you
and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain
entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
action to a particular entity, consult the technical person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established a docket for this action under
docket identification number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0397. The docket is
available for public viewing at the EPA Docket Center, Rm. B102, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room telephone number is
(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566-0280.
2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the Federal Register
listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the OPPT docket.
II. Background
A. What is a TSCA Section 21 Petition
Section 21 of TSCA allows citizens to petition EPA to initiate a
proceeding for the issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule under TSCA
section 4, 6, or 8 or an order under section 5(e) or 6(b)(2). A TSCA
section 21 petition must set forth facts that the petitioner believes
establish the need for the action requested. EPA is required to grant
or deny the petition within 90 days of its filing. If EPA grants the
petition, the Agency must promptly commence an appropriate proceeding.
If EPA denies the petition, the Agency must publish its reasons for the
denial in the Federal Register. Within 60 days of denial, or the
expiration of the 90-day period, if no action is taken, the petitioners
may commence a civil action in a U.S. district court to compel
initiation of the requested rulemaking proceeding.
B. What Action is Requested Under this TSCA Section 21 Petition?
On April 21, 2006, the Sierra Club petitioned EPA to take four
actions intended to reduce risks from toy jewelry containing lead. The
Sierra Club defines toy jewelry as any item that serves a decorative
but no or minimal functional purpose that is valued at less than $20
per item. The requested actions are:
Require TSCA section 8(d) health and safety data reporting
for lead and lead salts.
Submit a TSCA section 9 report to CPSC regarding lead and
lead salts.
Issue a TSCA section 5(a) significant new use rule
regarding lead and lead salts in toy jewelry.
Issue TSCA section 6(b) quality control orders regarding
production of toy jewelry.
The petition also requested certain actions by CPSC.
Again, of the actions requested by the petitioner, TSCA section 21
applies only to actions under TSCA sections 6(b) and 8(d), and these
requests are addressed in this notice.
III. Disposition of Petition
EPA does not believe that the actions requested by the petitioner
under TSCA sections 6(b) and 8(d) would be helpful in addressing the
problem presented by lead in toy jewelry, at this time. These two
requests are therefore denied. The other two requests, for actions
under TSCA sections 5(a) and 9, are not petitionable under TSCA section
21. Section 21 enumerates specific sections and subsections of TSCA
under which any person may petition the Administrator to initiate a
proceeding for the issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule or an
order. Sections 5(a) and 9 are not included.
A. Request to Issue Section 6(b) Quality Control Order Regarding
Production of Toy Jewelry
EPA does not believe that section 6(b) is an appropriate tool to
address the risks associated with lead in toy jewelry at this time. The
use of section 6(b) would be most beneficial when the Agency can
identify a small number of companies who, by their unique actions, are
causing unreasonable risks to be present. In the case at hand, EPA
believes that this approach may be inadequate and inefficient.
Information
[[Page 42641]]
contained in several of the public comments suggests that there may be
numerous instances where toy jewelry containing lead is still available
in the marketplace. EPA is working in coordination with CPSC to
understand the scope of the problem. A holistic and proactive approach
may be more effective and less resource intensive than the case-by-case
approach provided for under section 6(b).
Where the Administrator has a reasonable basis to conclude that a
particular manufacturer or processor is manufacturing or processing a
chemical substance or mixture in a manner which unintentionally causes
the chemical substance or mixture to present an unreasonable risk, TSCA
section 6(b)(1) allows the Administrator to require the manufacturer or
processor to provide information regarding the relevant quality control
procedures followed in the manufacturing or processing. If the
Administrator then determines such procedures are inadequate, TSCA
section 6(b)(2) allows the Administrator to require the manufacturer or
processor to revise its procedures. EPA notes that only orders under
section 6(b)(2) are subject to TSCA section 21. The request contained
in this petition is for orders to remedy quality control procedures
where necessary (section 6(b)(2)). However, EPA is not in a position to
issue such orders at this time because it has not issued any section
6(b)(1) orders that could provide the basis for section 6(b)(2) orders.
The request that EPA identify and issue section 6(b) orders to all
manufacturers and processors producing toy jewelry with greater than
0.06% lead is therefore denied. However, EPA is not foreclosing the
possibility of issuing section 6(b) orders in the future should it
conclude that section 6(b) is an appropriate tool to address risks
presented by particular manufacturers or processors.
B. Request to Require TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Data
Reporting for Lead and Lead Salts
TSCA section 8(d) authorizes the Agency to promulgate rules
requiring that manufacturers, processors, and distributors of chemical
substances or mixtures submit lists and copies of such health and
safety studies to the Administrator. While this could allow the Agency
to require the submission of health and safety studies on lead and lead
salts, the Agency does not believe that a section 8(d) rule would
provide useful information, at this time.
Extensive and detailed information on the toxicity of lead is
already widely available. The Agency is already in possession of
voluminous information on the health hazards of lead, and has
undertaken numerous rulemakings and other actions based on this
information. Along with the rest of the federal government and many
other bodies, the Agency has concluded that lead can cause multiple
adverse health effects, and has set a goal to eliminate lead poisoning
as a major health concern in children by 2010. While the Agency is
always open to the receipt of additional information on the health and
safety of various substances, it believes that the health effects of
lead are already well-known and accepted. Over the course of EPA's many
rulemaking and policy development efforts to address lead risks to
children, including numerous notice and comment proceedings, public
meetings, and other fora for exchange of information, EPA believes that
it has assessed the most critical existing lead health and safety
studies that EPA and/or CPSC would find most valuable for regulatory
purposes.
While it is possible some new information could be obtained from a
section 8(d) rule, EPA does not consider it likely that it would gain
significant new information through a section 8(d) rule requiring the
types of studies identified by the petitioner. In addition, it is not
clear that EPA has authority to obtain under section 8(d) all of the
information identified by the petitioner (e.g., information on
marketing and patterns of use).
For the reasons described above, EPA does not believe, at this
time, that the requested section 8(d) rule would be helpful in
assessing the risks to children from lead in toy jewelry and is, thus,
denying this request. However, EPA is continuing to work with CPSC, and
would consider doing a targeted section 8(d) rule should EPA conclude
in the future that it has a need for specific information that could
likely be obtained through this mechanism.
IV. Related Issues
After receiving this petition, EPA published a notice in theFederal
Register soliciting comments and further information on the issues
associated with lead in toy jewelry (71 FR 30921, May 31, 2006) (FRL-
8069-3). EPA has carefully assessed this information, along with the
information provided in the petition, and will continue to evaluate
this information and conduct additional analyses to better understand
the scope and severity of this issue.
Despite EPA's reservations about the specific approaches requested
in this petition, the Agency is concerned about the continuing use of
lead in toy jewelry and is working with CPSC to develop the most
effective means to address this issue. The two Agencies have met four
times since receiving this petition and have established an interagency
group to identify the most effective steps to move forward. In the
short-term, EPA will work with CPSC to examine approaches to outreach
to retailers.
V. Comments Received
EPA received 10 comments in response to the Federal Register notice
published May 31, 2006 (71 FR 30921), announcing EPA's receipt of this
TSCA section 21 petition.
Five comments were received from state and municipal governmental
agencies (Chicago, Minnesota, Minneapolis/Hennepin County, New York
State, and Illinois), all of which strongly supported the petition.
Several of these comments included survey data and anecdotal
information showing that toy jewelry containing lead is available and
causes moderate to severe health effects. These comments stressed the
need for Federal action to eliminate lead from toy jewelry. Several
comments also stressed that Federal action is needed to eliminate lead
from other consumer and children's products as well.
Four comments were received from other sources (a private citizen,
the Regulated Community Compliance Project of Boston University, the
Coastal Health District, and Kids in Danger) which were also supportive
of the petition, describing health risks to children from lead in toy
jewelry. These comments did not include additional data, except that
one (from Kids In Danger) included its 2004 report ``Playing With
Poison: Lead Poisoning Hazards of Children's Products, 1990-2004'').
These comments also urged federal action to eliminate lead in toy
jewelry and in other products.
One trade association (the Association of Battery Recyclers (ABR))
submitted comments. This commenter opposed the petition for the TSCA
section 8(d) request, on the bases that the petitioner had not
identified benefits to be derived from the use of section 8(d), had not
demonstrated why EPA action is needed given CPSC programs, and was
overly broad. The comment also opposed the TSCA section 9 request on
the basis of being overly broad. This commenter had no comment on the
requests for action under TSCA sections 5(a) and 6(b).
EPA has considered these comments in responding to the petition.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, lead, children's health.
[[Page 42642]]
Dated: July 20, 2006.
James B. Gilliford
Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances.
[FR Doc. E6-12044 Filed 7-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S