2H-Azepin-2-one, 1-Ethenylhexahydro-, Homopolymer I; Tolerance Exemption, 42288-42291 [E6-11953]
Download as PDF
42288
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of section
408(n)(4) of the FFDCA. For these same
reasons, the Agency has determined that
this rule does not have any ‘‘tribal
implications’’ as described in Executive
Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November
6, 2000). Executive Order 13175,
requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by tribal officials in the
development of regulatorypolicies that
have tribal implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that
have tribal implications’’ is defined in
the Executive order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
rule will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
XII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of this rule in
the Federal Register. This rule is not a
‘‘major rule ’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_1
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: July 17, 2006.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:27 Jul 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
PART 180—AMENDED
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.960 is amended in the
table by removing the entry for ‘‘aButyl-w-hydroxypoly(oxypropylene)
block polymer with poly(oxyethylene);
molecular weight (in amu) 2,400—
3,500’’ and by alphabetically adding a
polymer to read as follows:
I
§ 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
*
*
*
*
*
Polymer
*
*
*
CAS No.
*
Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with
Oxirane, Monobutyl Ether
*
*
*
*
*
9038–95–3
*
[FR Doc. E6–11952 Filed 7–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0551; FRL–8075–7]
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0551. All documents in the
docket are listed in the index for the
docket. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive,
Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bipin Gandhi, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 308–8380; e-mail address:
gandhi.bipin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
2H-Azepin-2-one, 1-Ethenylhexahydro-,
Homopolymer I; Tolerance Exemption
I. General Information
AGENCY:
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of 2H-azepin-2one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer; when used as an inert
ingredient in a pesticide chemical
formulation BASF AG submitted a
petition to EPA under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as
amended by the Food Quality Protection
Act of 1996 (FQPA) requesting an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the
need to establish a maximum
permissible level for residues of 2Hazepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer.
DATES: This regulation is effective July
26, 2006. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
September 25, 2006, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111)
• Animal production (NAICS code
112)
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311)
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532)
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic
copy of this Federal Register document
through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access
this ‘‘Federal Register’’ document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may
also access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s pilot e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_1
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as
amended by the FQPA, any person may
file an objection to any aspect of this
regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. The EPA
procedural regulations which govern the
submission of objections and requests
for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.
You must file your objection or request
a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0551 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
on or before September 25, 2006.
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket that is described in
ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your
copies, identified by docket ID number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0551, by one of
the following methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S.
Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:29 Jul 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of March 1,
2006 (71 FR 10505) (FRL–7762–2), EPA
issued a notice pursuant to section 408
of the FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a, as
amended by the FQPA (Public Law 104–
170), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 6E7026) by BASF
AG, 67052 Ludwigshafen, Germany. The
petition requested that 40 CFR 180.960
be amended by establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of 2H-azepin-2one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer; CAS Reg. No. 25189–83–
7. That notice included a summary of
the petition prepared by the petitioner.
There were no comments in response to
the notice of filing.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA requires EPA
to give special consideration to
exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in
establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance and to
‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate
exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue...’’ and specifies factors EPA is
to consider in establishing an
exemption.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients
that are not active ingredients as defined
in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are
not limited to, the following types of
ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own):
Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as
polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and
diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose;
wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42289
dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not
intended to imply nontoxicity; the
ingredient may or may not be
chemically active. Generally, EPA has
exempted inert ingredients from the
requirement of a tolerance based on the
low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Risk Assessment and Statutory
Findings
EPA establishes exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance only in those
cases where it can be shown that the
risks from aggregate exposure to
pesticide chemical residues under
reasonably foreseeable circumstances
will pose no appreciable risks to human
health. In order to determine the risks
from aggregate exposure to pesticide
inert ingredients, the Agency considers
the toxicity of the inert in conjunction
with possible exposure to residues of
the inert ingredient through food,
drinking water, and through other
exposures that occur as a result of
pesticide use in residential settings. If
EPA is able to determine that a finite
tolerance is not necessary to ensure that
there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the inert ingredient, an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance may be established.
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D)
of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
action and considered its validity,
completeness and reliability and the
relationship of this information to
human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the
variability of the sensitivities of major
identifiable subgroups of consumers,
including infants and children. In the
case of certain chemical substances that
are defined as polymers, the Agency has
established a set of criteria to identify
categories of polymers that should
present minimal or no risk. The
definition of a polymer is given in 40
CFR 723.250(b). The following
exclusion criteria for identifying these
low risk polymers are described in 40
CFR 723.250(d).
1. The polymer, 2H-azepin-2-one, 1ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer, is
not a cationic polymer nor is it
reasonably anticipated to become a
cationic polymer in a natural aquatic
environment.
2. The polymer does contain as an
integral part of its composition the
atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, and
oxygen.
3. The polymer does not contain as an
integral part of its composition, except
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
42290
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_1
as impurities, any element other than
those listed in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii).
4. The polymer is neither designed
nor can it be reasonably anticipated to
substantially degrade, decompose, or
depolymerize.
5. The polymer is manufactured or
imported from monomers and/or
reactants that are already included on
the TSCA Chemical Substance
Inventory or manufactured under an
applicable TSCA section 5 exemption.
6. The polymer is not a water
absorbing polymer with a number
average molecular weight (MW) greater
than or equal to 10,000 daltons.
Additionally, the polymer, 2H-azepin2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer, also meets as required
the following exemption criteria
specified in 40 CFR 723.250(e).
7. The polymer’s number average
molecular weight (MW) of 4,500 is
greater than 1,000 and less than 10,000
daltons. The polymer contains less than
10% oligomeric material below MW 500
and less than 25% oligomeric material
below MW 1,000, and the polymer does
not contain any reactive functional
groups.
Thus, 2H-azepin-2-one, 1ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer meet
all the criteria for a polymer to be
considered low risk under 40 CFR
723.250. Based on its conformance to
the above criteria, no mammalian
toxicity is anticipated from dietary,
inhalation, or dermal exposure to 2Hazepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer.
V. Aggregate Exposures
For the purposes of assessing
potential exposure under this
exemption, EPA considered that 2Hazepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer could be present in all
raw and processed agricultural
commodities and drinking water, and
that non-occupational non-dietary
exposure was possible. The number
average MW of 2H-azepin-2-one, 1ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer is
4500 daltons. Generally, a polymer of
this size would be poorly absorbed
through the intact gastrointestinal tract
or through intact human skin. Since 2Hazepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer conform to the criteria
that identify a low risk polymer, there
are no concerns for risks associated with
any potential exposure scenarios that
are reasonably foreseeable. The Agency
has determined that a tolerance is not
necessary to protect the public health.
VI. Cumulative Effects
Section 408 (b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:29 Jul 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance or tolerance exemption, the
Agency consider ‘‘available
information’’ concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular chemical’s
residues and ‘‘other substances that
have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA does not have, at this time,
available data to determine whether 2Hazepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer has a common
mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. Unlike other pesticides for
which EPA has followed a cumulative
risk approach based on a common
mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not
made a common mechanism of toxicity
finding as to 2H-azepin-2-one, 1ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer and
any other substances and 2H-azepin-2one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by
other substances. For the purposes of
this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has
not assumed that 2H-azepin-2-one, 1ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer has a
common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances. For information
regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see the policy statements
released by EPA’s Office of Pesticide
Programs concerning common
mechanism determinations and
procedures for cumulating effects from
substances found to have a common
mechanism on EPA’s website at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
VII. Additional Safety Factor for the
Protection of Infants and Children
Section 408 of the FFDCA provides
that EPA shall apply an additional
tenfold margin of safety for infants and
children in the case of threshold effects
to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the
data base unless EPA concludes that a
different margin of safety will be safe for
infants and children. Due to the
expected low toxicity of 2H-azepin-2one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer, EPA has not used a
safety factor analysis to assess the risk.
For the same reasons the additional
tenfold safety factor is unnecessary.
VIII. Determination of Safety
Based on the conformance to the
criteria used to identify a low risk
polymer, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty of no harm to the
U.S. population, including infants and
children, from aggregate exposure to
residues of 2H-azepin-2-one, 1ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IX. Other Considerations
A. Endocrine Disruptors
There is no available evidence that
2H-azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer is an endocrine disruptor.
B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
without any numerical limitation.
C. International Tolerances
The Agency is not aware of any
country requiring a tolerance for 2Hazepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer nor have any CODEX
Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) been
established for any food crops at this
time.
X. Conclusion
Accordingly, EPA finds that
exempting residues of 2H-azepin-2-one,
1-ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer
from the requirement of a tolerance will
be safe.
XI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes an
exemption from the tolerance
requirement under section 408(d) of the
FFDCA in response to a petition
submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866,
entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993).
Because this rule has been exempted
from review under Executive Order
12866 due to its lack of significance,
this rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose
any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public
Law 104–4). Nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994); or OMB review or any Agency
action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are
established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of the FFDCA,
such as the exemption in this final rule,
do not require the issuance of a
proposed rule, the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. In
addition, the Agency has determined
that this action will not have a
substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism(64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Executive Order 13132 requires
EPA to develop an accountable process
to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies
that have federalism implications’’ is
defined in the Executive order to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ This final rule
directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers and food
retailers, not States. This action does not
alter the relationships or distribution of
power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption
provisions of section 408(n)(4) of the
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the
Agency has determined that this rule
does not have any ‘‘tribal implications’’
as described in Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000). Executive
Order 13175, requires EPA to develop
an accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal
officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal
implications’’ is defined in the
Executive order to include regulations
that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:29 Jul 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
rule will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
XII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of this rule in
the Federal Register. This rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: July 10, 2006.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371
2. In § 180.960 the table is amended
by alphabetically adding a polymer to
read as follow:
I
§ 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
*
*
*
*
Polymer
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00051
CAS No.
*
2H-Azepin-2-one, 1ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer
*
*
Fmt 4700
[FR Doc. E6–11953 Filed 7–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0556; FRL–8077–5]
2-Propenoic Acid, 2-Methyl-, Polymer
with Ethenylbenzene, 2-Ethylhexyl 2Propenoate, 2-Hydroxyethyl 2Propenoate, N-(Hydroxymethyl) -2Methyl-2-Propenamide and Methyl 2Methyl-2-Propenoate, Ammonium Salt;
Tolerance Exemption
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of 2-propenoic
acid, 2- methyl-, polymer with
ethenylbenzene, 2-ethylhexyl 2propenoate, 2-hydroxyethyl 2propenoate, N-(hydroxymethyl) -2methyl-2-propenamide and methyl 2methyl-2-propenoate, ammonium salt
when used as an inert ingredient in a
pesticide chemical formulation. E. I. du
Pont de Nemours and Company, Inc.
submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), as amended by the Food
Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA)
requesting an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of 2-propenoic acid, 2methyl-, polymer with ethenylbenzene,
2-ethylhexyl 2-propenoate, 2hydroxyethyl 2-propenoate, N(hydroxymethyl) -2-methyl-2propenamide and methyl 2-methyl-2propenoate, ammonium salt.
DATES: This regulation is effective July
26, 2006. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
September 25, 2006, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0556. All documents in the
docket are listed in the index for the
docket. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
ADDRESSES:
*
*
*
25189–83–7
*
Sfmt 4700
*
*
42291
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 26, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42288-42291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11953]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0551; FRL-8075-7]
2H-Azepin-2-one, 1-Ethenylhexahydro-, Homopolymer I; Tolerance
Exemption
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of 2H-azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer; when used as an inert ingredient in a pesticide chemical
formulation BASF AG submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality
Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA) requesting an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of 2H-azepin-2-one,
1-ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer.
DATES: This regulation is effective July 26, 2006. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before September 25, 2006,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0551. All documents in the
docket are listed in the index for the docket. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or,
if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in
Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive,
Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone
number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bipin Gandhi, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 308-8380; e-mail address: gandhi.bipin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111)
Animal production (NAICS code 112)
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311)
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532)
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
[[Page 42289]]
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access this ``Federal Register'' document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a
frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the
Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or
request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by
EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0551 in the
subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be
in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or
before September 25, 2006.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0551, by one of the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of March 1, 2006 (71 FR 10505) (FRL-7762-
2), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408 of the FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a, as amended by the FQPA (Public Law 104-170), announcing the
filing of a pesticide petition (PP 6E7026) by BASF AG, 67052
Ludwigshafen, Germany. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.960 be
amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of 2H-azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer; CAS Reg. No. 25189-83-7. That notice included a summary of
the petition prepared by the petitioner. There were no comments in
response to the notice of filing.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA
defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other
exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This includes
exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does
not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA
requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and
children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children
from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue...'' and
specifies factors EPA is to consider in establishing an exemption.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active.
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Risk Assessment and Statutory Findings
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be shown that the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably foreseeable
circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human health. In order
to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert
ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in
conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to
determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the requirement of
a tolerance may be established.
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed
the available scientific data and other relevant information in support
of this action and considered its validity, completeness and
reliability and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA
has also considered available information concerning the variability of
the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers,
including infants and children. In the case of certain chemical
substances that are defined as polymers, the Agency has established a
set of criteria to identify categories of polymers that should present
minimal or no risk. The definition of a polymer is given in 40 CFR
723.250(b). The following exclusion criteria for identifying these low
risk polymers are described in 40 CFR 723.250(d).
1. The polymer, 2H-azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer,
is not a cationic polymer nor is it reasonably anticipated to become a
cationic polymer in a natural aquatic environment.
2. The polymer does contain as an integral part of its composition
the atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.
3. The polymer does not contain as an integral part of its
composition, except
[[Page 42290]]
as impurities, any element other than those listed in 40 CFR
723.250(d)(2)(ii).
4. The polymer is neither designed nor can it be reasonably
anticipated to substantially degrade, decompose, or depolymerize.
5. The polymer is manufactured or imported from monomers and/or
reactants that are already included on the TSCA Chemical Substance
Inventory or manufactured under an applicable TSCA section 5 exemption.
6. The polymer is not a water absorbing polymer with a number
average molecular weight (MW) greater than or equal to 10,000 daltons.
Additionally, the polymer, 2H-azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer, also meets as required the following exemption criteria
specified in 40 CFR 723.250(e).
7. The polymer's number average molecular weight (MW) of 4,500 is
greater than 1,000 and less than 10,000 daltons. The polymer contains
less than 10% oligomeric material below MW 500 and less than 25%
oligomeric material below MW 1,000, and the polymer does not contain
any reactive functional groups.
Thus, 2H-azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer meet all
the criteria for a polymer to be considered low risk under 40 CFR
723.250. Based on its conformance to the above criteria, no mammalian
toxicity is anticipated from dietary, inhalation, or dermal exposure to
2H-azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer.
V. Aggregate Exposures
For the purposes of assessing potential exposure under this
exemption, EPA considered that 2H-azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer could be present in all raw and processed agricultural
commodities and drinking water, and that non-occupational non-dietary
exposure was possible. The number average MW of 2H-azepin-2-one, 1-
ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer is 4500 daltons. Generally, a polymer of
this size would be poorly absorbed through the intact gastrointestinal
tract or through intact human skin. Since 2H-azepin-2-one, 1-
ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer conform to the criteria that identify a
low risk polymer, there are no concerns for risks associated with any
potential exposure scenarios that are reasonably foreseeable. The
Agency has determined that a tolerance is not necessary to protect the
public health.
VI. Cumulative Effects
Section 408 (b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance or tolerance
exemption, the Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular chemical's residues and ``other
substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.'' EPA does not
have, at this time, available data to determine whether 2H-azepin-2-
one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer has a common mechanism of
toxicity with other substances. Unlike other pesticides for which EPA
has followed a cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of
toxicity, EPA has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to
2H-azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer and any other
substances and 2H-azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer does
not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances.
For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not
assumed that 2H-azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer has a
common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For information
regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see the policy statements released by EPA's Office of
Pesticide Programs concerning common mechanism determinations and
procedures for cumulating effects from substances found to have a
common mechanism on EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/
cumulative.
VII. Additional Safety Factor for the Protection of Infants and
Children
Section 408 of the FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the
case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the data base unless EPA concludes
that a different margin of safety will be safe for infants and
children. Due to the expected low toxicity of 2H-azepin-2-one, 1-
ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer, EPA has not used a safety factor
analysis to assess the risk. For the same reasons the additional
tenfold safety factor is unnecessary.
VIII. Determination of Safety
Based on the conformance to the criteria used to identify a low
risk polymer, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty of no
harm to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from
aggregate exposure to residues of 2H-azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-,
homopolymer.
IX. Other Considerations
A. Endocrine Disruptors
There is no available evidence that 2H-azepin-2-one, 1-
ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer is an endocrine disruptor.
B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance without any numerical limitation.
C. International Tolerances
The Agency is not aware of any country requiring a tolerance for
2H-azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer nor have any CODEX
Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) been established for any food crops at
this time.
X. Conclusion
Accordingly, EPA finds that exempting residues of 2H-azepin-2-one,
1-ethenylhexahydro-, homopolymer from the requirement of a tolerance
will be safe.
XI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes an exemption from the tolerance
requirement under section 408(d) of the FFDCA in response to a petition
submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993). Because this rule has been exempted from review under Executive
Order 12866 due to its lack of significance, this rule is not subject
to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001). This final rule does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4). Nor
does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994);
or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
[[Page 42291]]
This action does not involve any technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to
section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the
basis of a petition under section 408(d) of the FFDCA, such as the
exemption in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has
determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132,
entitled Federalism(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order
13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' This final
rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers and
food retailers, not States. This action does not alter the
relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of the
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this rule
does not have any ``tribal implications'' as described in Executive
Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000). Executive Order 13175,
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal
implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.'' This rule will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
XII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of this rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 10, 2006.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371
0
2. In Sec. 180.960 the table is amended by alphabetically adding a
polymer to read as follow:
Sec. 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Polymer CAS No. /BOXHD>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
2H-Azepin-2-one, 1-ethenylhexahydro-, 25189-83-7
homopolymer
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. E6-11953 Filed 7-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S