Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, 42270-42271 [E6-11917]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
42270
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) The request must relate to
information that constitutes trade
secrets or other confidential commercial
or financial information regarding the
business transactions of an interested
person, the disclosure of which would
cause substantial harm to the
competitive position of that person;
(iv) The request must set forth the
reasons why the information should not
be disclosed, including the reasons the
disclosure of the information would
prejudice the competitive position of
the interested person; and
(v) The request must be supported by
a signed statement by the interested
person, or by an authorized officer or
employee of that person, certifying that
the information in question is a trade
secret or other confidential commercial
or financial information and that the
information is not already in the public
domain.
Signed: February 16, 2006.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: March 16, 2006.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. E6–11872 Filed 7–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under
the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
Department of the Navy, DOD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy
is amending its certifications and
exemptions under the International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that
the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law)
has determined that USS GRIDLEY
(DDG 101) is a vessel of the Navy which,
due to its special construction and
purpose, cannot fully comply with
certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS
without interfering with its special
function as a naval ship. The intended
effect of this rule is to warn mariners in
waters where 72 COLREGS apply.
DATES: Effective Date: July 17, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commander Gregg A. Cervi, JAGC, U.S.
Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law),
Office of the Judge Advocate General,
Department of the Navy, 1322 Patterson
Ave., SE., Suite 3000, Washington Navy
Yard, DC 20374–5066, telephone 202–
685–5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C.
1605, the Department of the Navy
amends 32 CFR part 706. This
amendment provides notice that the
Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law),
under authority delegated by the
Secretary of the Navy, has certified that
USS GRIDLEY (DDG 101) is a vessel of
the Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
comply with the following specific
provisions of 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a
naval ship: Annex I, paragraph 2(f)(i),
pertaining to the placement of the
masthead light or lights above and clear
of all other lights and obstructions;
Annex I, paragraph 2(f)(ii), pertaining to
the vertical placement of task lights;
Annex I, paragraph 3(a), pertaining to
the location of the forward masthead
light in the forward quarter of the ship,
and the horizontal distance between the
forward and after masthead lights; and
Annex I, paragraph 3(c), pertaining to
placement of task lights not less than
two meters from the fore and aft
centerline of the ship in the athwartship
direction. The Deputy Assistant Judge
Advocate General (Admiralty and
Maritime Law) has also certified that the
lights involved are located in closest
possible compliance with the applicable
72 COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in
accordance with 32 CFR parts 296 and
701, that publication of this amendment
for public comment prior to adoption is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on technical findings that the
placement of lights on this vessel in a
manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel’s
ability to perform its military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water), and
Vessels.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, amend part 706 of title 32 of
the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
I
PART 706—CERTIFICATIONS AND
EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE
INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR
PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA,
1972
1. The authority citation for part 706
continues to read:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
2. Table Four, Paragraph 15 of § 706.2
is amended by adding, in numerical
order, the following entry for USS
GRIDLEY:
I
§ 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of
the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and
33 U.S.C. 1605.
*
Number
*
*
*
*
USS GRIDLEY ...........................................................................................................
*
DDG 101 ..........
*
*
3. Table Four, Paragraph 16 of § 706.2
is amended by adding, in numerical
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_1
I
*
order, the following entry for USS
GRIDLEY:
16:29 Jul 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
1.86 meters.
*
*
*
*
§ 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of
the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and
33 U.S.C. 1605.
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
Horizontal distance from the fore and aft
centerline of the vessel in the
athwartship direction
Vessel
*
*
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
*
*
26JYR1
*
*
42271
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 143 / Wednesday, July 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Obstruction angle relative ship’s
headings
Vessel
Number
*
*
*
*
USS GRIDLEY ...........................................................................................................
*
DDG 101 ..........
*
107.25° thru 112.50°.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
4. Table Five of § 706.2 is amended by
adding, in numerical order, the
following entry for USS GRIDLEY:
I
*
§ 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of
the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and
33 U.S.C. 1605.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE FIVE
Vessel
Number
Masthead
lights not over
all other lights
and obstructions. Annex I,
sec. 2(f)
*
*
*
USS GRIDLEY ........................................................................
*
DDG 101 .....
X
*
*
*
Approved: July 17, 2006.
Gregg A. Cervi,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy
Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty
and Maritime Law).
[FR Doc. E6–11917 Filed 7–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under
the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
Department of the Navy, DOD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_1
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy
is amending its certifications and
exemptions under the International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that
the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law)
has determined that USS KIDD (DDG
100) is a vessel of the Navy which, due
to its special construction and purpose,
cannot fully comply with certain
provisions of the 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a
naval ship. The intended effect of this
rule is to warn mariners in waters where
72 COLREGS apply.
DATES: Effective Date: July 14, 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:29 Jul 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
*
*
Fmt 4700
*
X
*
Commander Gregg A. Cervi, JAGC, U.S.
Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law),
Office of the Judge Advocate General,
Department of the Navy, 1322 Patterson
Ave., SE., Suite 3000, Washington Navy
Yard, DC 20374–5066, telephone 202–
685–5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C.
1605, the Department of the Navy
amends 32 CFR part 706. This
amendment provides notice that the
Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law),
under authority delegated by the
Secretary of the Navy, has certified that
USS KIDD (DDG 100) is a vessel of the
Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
comply with the following specific
provisions of 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a
naval ship: Annex I, paragraph 2(f)(i),
pertaining to the placement of the
masthead light or lights above and clear
of all other lights and obstructions;
Annex I, paragraph 2(f)(ii), pertaining to
the vertical placement of task lights;
Annex I, paragraph 3(a), pertaining to
the location of the forward masthead
light in the forward quarter of the ship,
and the horizontal distance between the
forward and after masthead lights; and
Annex I, paragraph 3(c), pertaining to
placement of task lights not less than
two meters from the fore and aft
Frm 00031
Sfmt 4700
After masthead light less
than 1⁄2 ship’s
length aft of
forward masthead light.
Annex I,
sec. 3(a)
X
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Forward masthead light not
in forward
quarter of
ship. Annex I,
sec. 3(a)
*
Percentage
horizontal
separation
attained
*
14.5
*
centerline of the ship in the athwartship
direction. The Deputy Assistant Judge
Advocate General (Admiralty and
Maritime Law) has also certified that the
lights involved are located in closest
possible compliance with the applicable
72 COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in
accordance with 32 CFR parts 296 and
701, that publication of this amendment
for public comment prior to adoption is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on technical findings that the
placement of lights on this vessel in a
manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel’s
ability to perform its military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water), and
Vessels.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, amend part 706 of title 32 of
the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
I
PART 706—CERTIFICATIONS AND
EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE
INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR
PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA,
1972
1. The authority citation for part 706
continues to read:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
E:\FR\FM\26JYR1.SGM
26JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 26, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42270-42271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11917]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations
for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy is amending its certifications and
exemptions under the International Regulations for Preventing
Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that the Deputy
Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law) has
determined that USS GRIDLEY (DDG 101) is a vessel of the Navy which,
due to its special construction and purpose, cannot fully comply with
certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS without interfering with its
special function as a naval ship. The intended effect of this rule is
to warn mariners in waters where 72 COLREGS apply.
DATES: Effective Date: July 17, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commander Gregg A. Cervi, JAGC, U.S.
Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime
Law), Office of the Judge Advocate General, Department of the Navy,
1322 Patterson Ave., SE., Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-
5066, telephone 202-685-5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority granted in 33
U.S.C. 1605, the Department of the Navy amends 32 CFR part 706. This
amendment provides notice that the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law), under authority delegated by the
Secretary of the Navy, has certified that USS GRIDLEY (DDG 101) is a
vessel of the Navy which, due to its special construction and purpose,
cannot fully comply with the following specific provisions of 72
COLREGS without interfering with its special function as a naval ship:
Annex I, paragraph 2(f)(i), pertaining to the placement of the masthead
light or lights above and clear of all other lights and obstructions;
Annex I, paragraph 2(f)(ii), pertaining to the vertical placement of
task lights; Annex I, paragraph 3(a), pertaining to the location of the
forward masthead light in the forward quarter of the ship, and the
horizontal distance between the forward and after masthead lights; and
Annex I, paragraph 3(c), pertaining to placement of task lights not
less than two meters from the fore and aft centerline of the ship in
the athwartship direction. The Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General
(Admiralty and Maritime Law) has also certified that the lights
involved are located in closest possible compliance with the applicable
72 COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in accordance with 32 CFR parts
296 and 701, that publication of this amendment for public comment
prior to adoption is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to public
interest since it is based on technical findings that the placement of
lights on this vessel in a manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel's ability to perform its
military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water), and Vessels.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, amend part 706 of title 32
of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 706--CERTIFICATIONS AND EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL
REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA, 1972
0
1. The authority citation for part 706 continues to read:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
0
2. Table Four, Paragraph 15 of Sec. 706.2 is amended by adding, in
numerical order, the following entry for USS GRIDLEY:
Sec. 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of the Navy under
Executive Order 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Horizontal
distance from
the fore and aft
Vessel Number centerline of
the vessel in
the athwartship
direction
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
USS GRIDLEY................... DDG 101............... 1.86 meters.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
3. Table Four, Paragraph 16 of Sec. 706.2 is amended by adding, in
numerical order, the following entry for USS GRIDLEY:
Sec. 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of the Navy under
Executive Order 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605.
* * * * *
[[Page 42271]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Obstruction
Vessel Number angle relative
ship's headings
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
USS GRIDLEY................... DDG 101............... 107.25[deg] thru
112.50[deg].
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
4. Table Five of Sec. 706.2 is amended by adding, in numerical order,
the following entry for USS GRIDLEY:
Sec. 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of the Navy under
Executive Order 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605.
* * * * *
Table Five
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After mast-head
Masthead lights Forward light less than
not over all masthead light \1/2\ ship's Percentage
other lights not in forward length aft of horizontal
Vessel Number and quarter of forward separation
obstructions. ship. Annex I, masthead light. attained
Annex I, sec. sec. 3(a) Annex I, sec.
2(f) 3(a)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
USS GRIDLEY.................................... DDG 101............................ X X X 14.5
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved: July 17, 2006.
Gregg A. Cervi,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General
(Admiralty and Maritime Law).
[FR Doc. E6-11917 Filed 7-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
