Sweet Cherries Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Removal of Container Regulations, 41723-41725 [E6-11736]
Download as PDF
41723
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 141
Monday, July 24, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 923
[Docket No. FV06–923–1 FIR]
Sweet Cherries Grown in Designated
Counties in Washington; Removal of
Container Regulations
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
final rule that removed the container
regulations prescribed under the
Washington sweet cherry marketing
order. Specifically, this rule finalizes
the removal of the requirement that
dark-colored sweet cherries be handled
in containers having a certain net
weight. The marketing order regulates
the handling of fresh sweet cherries
grown in designated counties in the
State of Washington, and is
administered locally by the Washington
Cherry Marketing Committee
(Committee). By eliminating the
container requirements, this regulatory
relaxation provides handlers with the
ability to meet the rapidly changing
wholesale, retail, and consumer demand
for innovative product packaging. This
is expected to enhance industry
marketing flexibility and efficiency.
DATES: Effective Date: August 23, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Curry or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue,
Suite 385, Portland, Oregon 97204–
2807; Telephone: (503) 326–2724; Fax:
(503) 326–7440.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Jul 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone (202) 720–
2491; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
923 (7 CFR part 923) regulating the
handling of sweet cherries grown in
designated counties in Washington,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule finalizes the removal of the
requirement that dark-colored sweet
cherries be handled in containers
having a certain net weight. This
relaxation in the regulations provides
handlers with the ability to meet the
rapidly changing wholesale, retail, and
consumer demand for innovative
product packaging, thereby enhancing
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
industry marketing flexibility and
efficiency.
Section 923.52 of the order authorizes
the issuance of regulations for grade,
size, quality, maturity, pack, and
container for any variety of sweet
cherries grown in the production area.
Section 923.52(a)(3) specifically
authorizes the establishment of the
container regulations found in
§ 923.322. Section 923.53 authorizes the
modification, suspension, or
termination of regulations issued
pursuant to § 923.52.
Authority to regulate the size,
capacity, weight, dimension, markings
or pack of containers used in the
handling of fresh sweet cherries was
included in the order when
promulgated in 1957. This authority
was included in the order to facilitate
container standardization and thus help
establish orderly marketing conditions
and increase producer returns.
The Committee meets prior to each
season to consider recommendations for
modification, suspension, or
termination of any regulatory
requirements for Washington sweet
cherries that are issued on a continuing
basis. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
The USDA reviews the Committee
recommendations along with any
supportive information submitted by the
Committee, as well as information from
other available resources, and
determines whether modification,
suspension, or termination of the
regulatory requirements would tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
At its February 28, 2006, meeting, the
Committee recommended that the
container regulations be entirely
removed from the handling regulations.
The Committee recommended that this
rule be effective as early as May 1, 2006,
to ensure that the earliest shipments of
sweet cherries benefit from the relaxed
regulations, and that container
manufacturers have adequate time prior
to the beginning of the shipping season
to retool if new containers are ordered
by the industry.
The container requirements provide
the Washington cherry industry with
container standardization to help ensure
orderly marketing conditions and
increased producer returns. Section
923.322(d) provided that: ‘‘No handler
shall handle any lot of cherries, except
E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM
24JYR1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
41724
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 141 / Monday, July 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
cherries of the Rainier, Royal Anne, and
similar varieties commonly referred to
as ‘‘light sweet cherries’’, unless such
cherries are in containers which meet
each of the following applicable
requirements:
(1) The net weight of loose packed
(jumble-filled) cherries in any container
shall be 12 pounds or less, or 20 pounds
or more. The net weight of face packed
cherries in any container shall be 15
pounds, or 12 pounds or less: Provided,
That containers with a net weight of 12
pounds or less may be packed together
with like containers in a master
shipping container.
(2) Subject to the provisions of
paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (ii) of this
section, shipments of cherries may be
handled in such experimental
containers as have been approved by the
Washington Cherry Marketing
Committee.’’
Paragraph (2) above refers to the
provisions of § 923.322(b)(2)(i) and (ii),
which specified that: ‘‘(i) All shipments
handled in such containers shall be
under the supervision of the committee;
and (ii) at least 90 percent, by count, of
the cherries in any lot of such
containers shall measure not less than
54/64 inch in diameter, and not more
than 5 percent, by count, may be less
than 52/64 inch in diameter.’’ Since the
provisions of (b)(2)(i) and (ii) referred to
experimental containers exempt under
923.322(d)(2), this rule also finalizes the
removal of both paragraphs from the
handling regulations.
Comments made at the public meeting
indicate that container standardization
has contributed to orderly marketing in
the past. Due to the changing dynamics
in the fresh produce industry, however,
buyers—at the wholesale, retail and
consumer level—are seeking many more
packaging options than have been
available in the past. Handlers report
that buyers are increasingly interested
in non-traditional packaging options
designed for better handling and greater
consumer acceptance. Handlers also
desire greater latitude in choosing the
optimum weight for a particular type of
pack. Of specific concern to this
industry is the ability to pack cherries
in containers with net weights of
between 12 and 20 pounds—a weight
range specifically barred under the
removed container regulation.
Although § 923.322(d)(2) provided for
experimental container exemptions,
those handlers who have utilized this
exemption in the past felt that the
process was too cumbersome and timeconsuming, thus failing to provide the
optimal flexibility they need under
current marketing conditions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Jul 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
Regardless of the size, capacity, or
type containers the industry may
eventually use, the Committee believes
that the Washington cherry industry
desires flexibility in packaging darkcolored sweet cherries. This action
provides the industry with needed
flexibility.
This rule not only finalizes the
removal of the container regulations
(§ 923.322(d)), but also finalizes
necessary conforming changes through
the removal of § 923.322(b)(2)(i) and (ii),
as well as references to container
requirements in § 923.322(f)(1)(ii) and
§ 923.322(g).
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 1,500 cherry
producers within the regulated
production area and approximately 53
regulated handlers. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $6,500,000.
For the 2005 shipping season, the
Washington Agricultural Statistics
Service prepared a preliminary report
showing that the total 113,000 ton fresh
market sweet cherry utilization sold for
an average of $2,830 per ton. Based on
the number of producers in the
production area, the average producer
revenue from the sale of sweet cherries
in 2005 is estimated at approximately
$213,200 per year. In addition, the
Committee reports that most of the
industry’s 53 handlers would have each
averaged gross receipts of less than
$6,500,000 from the sale of fresh sweet
cherries last season. Thus, the majority
of producers and handlers of
Washington sweet cherries may be
classified as small entities.
At its February 28, 2006, meeting the
Committee recommended that the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
container regulations in § 923.322(d) be
removed from the order’s rules and
regulations. Section 923.52(a)(3) of the
order specifically authorizes the
establishment of container regulations.
Further, § 923.53 authorizes the
modification, suspension, or
termination of regulations issued
pursuant to § 923.52. This relaxation in
the regulations provides handlers with
the ability to meet the rapidly changing
wholesale, retail, and consumer demand
for innovative product packaging, thus
enhancing industry marketing flexibility
and efficiency.
The Committee anticipates that this
rule will not negatively impact small
businesses. This rule finalizes the
removal of the container requirements
found under § 923.322(d) of the order’s
rules and regulations, and, thus, should
provide the industry with greater
marketing opportunities. The
Committee believes that any additional
costs this action may have on the
industry would be associated with the
development and use of new containers.
Such costs would likely be offset by
new marketing opportunities.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to its recommendation to remove the
container regulations. The Committee
explored the option of leaving the
container regulations intact without
change. This option was rejected as
being an inadequate response to the
demand for greater flexibility in the
packaging of fresh cherries. Temporary
suspension of the regulations was
considered, and then discarded, as also
being inadequate for the current
marketing situation.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
cherry handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.
AMS is committed to compliance
with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires
Government agencies in general to
provide the public the option of
submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible.
The Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Washington
cherry industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee
E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM
24JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 141 / Monday, July 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
meetings, the February 28, 2006,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express their views on this issue.
An interim final rule regarding this
action was published in the Federal
Register on April 10, 2006. Committee
staff ensured that copies of the rule were
made available to Committee members
and Washington sweet cherry industry
members. In addition, the rule was
made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. The interim final rule provided
for a 60-day comment period that ended
June 9, 2006. No comments were
received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Committee’s recommendation, and
other information, it is found that
finalization of the interim final rule,
without change, as published in the
Federal Register (71 FR 17982, April 10,
2006) will tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 923
Cherries, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 923—SWEET CHERRIES
GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES
IN WASHINGTON
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR part 923 which was
published at 71 FR 17982 on April 10,
2006, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
I
Dated: July 18, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E6–11736 Filed 7–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
7 CFR Part 1250
[Docket No. PY–06–001]
Amendment to Egg Research and
Promotion Rules and Regulations
AGENCY:
Agricultural Marketing Service.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Jul 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
Interim final rule with request
for comments.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This action will amend the
Egg Research and Promotion Rules and
Regulations by changing the State
composition of the six geographic areas
on the American Egg Board. The Board
approved this change and requested that
the Secretary amend the Rules and
Regulations accordingly. This
adjustment is based on changing
geographic trends in egg production and
would become effective beginning with
the 2007–08 membership term.
DATES: Effective July 25, 2006.
Comments must be received by August
23, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments are to be
mailed to Angela C. Snyder, Chief,
Research and Promotion, Poultry
Programs, AMS, USDA, Stop 0256, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20090–6456; or by fax
to (202) 720–5631. Alternatively,
comments may be submitted
electronically to:
angie.snyder@usda.gov. Comments may
also be submitted electronically to:
AMSPYDockets@usda.gov or https://
www.regulations.gov. State that your
comments refer to Docket No. PY–06–
001. Comments should be submitted in
duplicate. Comments received may be
inspected at this location between 8
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. Comments
received also will be made available
over the Internet in the rulemaking
section of the AMS Web site https://
www.ams.usda.gov/rulemaking. A copy
of this interim final rule may be found
at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/poultry/
regulations/rulemaking/index.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela C. Snyder, (202) 720–5131.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Egg
Research and Promotion Order (Order)
is issued under the Egg Research and
Consumer Information Act (Act), as
amended [7 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.].
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
has waived the review process required
by Executive Order 12866 for this
action.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have a retroactive effect. This rule
would not preempt any State or local
laws, regulations, or policies, unless
they present an irreconcilable conflict
with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
41725
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 14 of the Act, a person subject
to an order may file provisions of such
Order or any obligations imposed in
connection with such Order are not in
accordance with law; and requesting a
modification of the Order or an
exemption there from. Such person is
afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After a hearing, the
Secretary would rule on the petition.
The Act provides that the district court
of the United States in any district in
which such person is an inhabitant, or
has his principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review the Secretary’s
ruling on the petition, if a complaint is
filed within 20 days after date of the
entry of the ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Agricultural Marketing Service
has determined that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities,
as defined by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The rule
imposes no new burden on the industry
but merely adjusts area distribution to
reflect geographic shifts in production
since the last review. In accordance
with the provisions of the Act and
section 1250.328 of the Order, the area
grouping of the 48 contiguous States are
to be reviewed by the Board at least
every 5 years. Based on the latest
review, the Board has recommended
adjustment of area distribution to reflect
sustained geographic shifts in egg
production. Total United States table
egg production was 76.98 billion in
2005, representing a 9% increase in
exports and continued increases in
domestic per capita consumption.
There are approximately 260 egg
producers required to pay assessments
to the Board under the Act. The Act
exempts producers owning less than
75,000 laying hens from paying
assessments; therefore, the nation’s
smallest producers are exempt from the
program. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) [13 CFR 121.201]
defines small agricultural producers as
those having receipts of $750,000 or less
annually and small agricultural service
firms as those having receipts of $6.5
million or less annually. None of the
260 producers subject to the Act are
believed to be categorized by the SBA as
small agricultural producers.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Information collection requirements
and recordkeeping provisions contained
in 7 CFR part 1250 have been previously
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget and assigned OMB Control
E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM
24JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 141 (Monday, July 24, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41723-41725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11736]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 141 / Monday, July 24, 2006 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 41723]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 923
[Docket No. FV06-923-1 FIR]
Sweet Cherries Grown in Designated Counties in Washington;
Removal of Container Regulations
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, without change, an interim final rule that removed the container
regulations prescribed under the Washington sweet cherry marketing
order. Specifically, this rule finalizes the removal of the requirement
that dark-colored sweet cherries be handled in containers having a
certain net weight. The marketing order regulates the handling of fresh
sweet cherries grown in designated counties in the State of Washington,
and is administered locally by the Washington Cherry Marketing
Committee (Committee). By eliminating the container requirements, this
regulatory relaxation provides handlers with the ability to meet the
rapidly changing wholesale, retail, and consumer demand for innovative
product packaging. This is expected to enhance industry marketing
flexibility and efficiency.
DATES: Effective Date: August 23, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Curry or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue,
Suite 385, Portland, Oregon 97204-2807; Telephone: (503) 326-2724; Fax:
(503) 326-7440.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone (202) 720-
2491; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 923 (7 CFR part 923) regulating the handling of sweet cherries
grown in designated counties in Washington, hereinafter referred to as
the ``order.'' The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter
referred to as the ``Act.''
USDA is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule finalizes the removal of the requirement that dark-
colored sweet cherries be handled in containers having a certain net
weight. This relaxation in the regulations provides handlers with the
ability to meet the rapidly changing wholesale, retail, and consumer
demand for innovative product packaging, thereby enhancing industry
marketing flexibility and efficiency.
Section 923.52 of the order authorizes the issuance of regulations
for grade, size, quality, maturity, pack, and container for any variety
of sweet cherries grown in the production area. Section 923.52(a)(3)
specifically authorizes the establishment of the container regulations
found in Sec. 923.322. Section 923.53 authorizes the modification,
suspension, or termination of regulations issued pursuant to Sec.
923.52.
Authority to regulate the size, capacity, weight, dimension,
markings or pack of containers used in the handling of fresh sweet
cherries was included in the order when promulgated in 1957. This
authority was included in the order to facilitate container
standardization and thus help establish orderly marketing conditions
and increase producer returns.
The Committee meets prior to each season to consider
recommendations for modification, suspension, or termination of any
regulatory requirements for Washington sweet cherries that are issued
on a continuing basis. Committee meetings are open to the public and
interested persons may express their views at these meetings. The USDA
reviews the Committee recommendations along with any supportive
information submitted by the Committee, as well as information from
other available resources, and determines whether modification,
suspension, or termination of the regulatory requirements would tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
At its February 28, 2006, meeting, the Committee recommended that
the container regulations be entirely removed from the handling
regulations. The Committee recommended that this rule be effective as
early as May 1, 2006, to ensure that the earliest shipments of sweet
cherries benefit from the relaxed regulations, and that container
manufacturers have adequate time prior to the beginning of the shipping
season to retool if new containers are ordered by the industry.
The container requirements provide the Washington cherry industry
with container standardization to help ensure orderly marketing
conditions and increased producer returns. Section 923.322(d) provided
that: ``No handler shall handle any lot of cherries, except
[[Page 41724]]
cherries of the Rainier, Royal Anne, and similar varieties commonly
referred to as ``light sweet cherries'', unless such cherries are in
containers which meet each of the following applicable requirements:
(1) The net weight of loose packed (jumble-filled) cherries in any
container shall be 12 pounds or less, or 20 pounds or more. The net
weight of face packed cherries in any container shall be 15 pounds, or
12 pounds or less: Provided, That containers with a net weight of 12
pounds or less may be packed together with like containers in a master
shipping container.
(2) Subject to the provisions of paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (ii) of
this section, shipments of cherries may be handled in such experimental
containers as have been approved by the Washington Cherry Marketing
Committee.''
Paragraph (2) above refers to the provisions of Sec.
923.322(b)(2)(i) and (ii), which specified that: ``(i) All shipments
handled in such containers shall be under the supervision of the
committee; and (ii) at least 90 percent, by count, of the cherries in
any lot of such containers shall measure not less than 54/64 inch in
diameter, and not more than 5 percent, by count, may be less than 52/64
inch in diameter.'' Since the provisions of (b)(2)(i) and (ii) referred
to experimental containers exempt under 923.322(d)(2), this rule also
finalizes the removal of both paragraphs from the handling regulations.
Comments made at the public meeting indicate that container
standardization has contributed to orderly marketing in the past. Due
to the changing dynamics in the fresh produce industry, however,
buyers--at the wholesale, retail and consumer level--are seeking many
more packaging options than have been available in the past. Handlers
report that buyers are increasingly interested in non-traditional
packaging options designed for better handling and greater consumer
acceptance. Handlers also desire greater latitude in choosing the
optimum weight for a particular type of pack. Of specific concern to
this industry is the ability to pack cherries in containers with net
weights of between 12 and 20 pounds--a weight range specifically barred
under the removed container regulation.
Although Sec. 923.322(d)(2) provided for experimental container
exemptions, those handlers who have utilized this exemption in the past
felt that the process was too cumbersome and time-consuming, thus
failing to provide the optimal flexibility they need under current
marketing conditions.
Regardless of the size, capacity, or type containers the industry
may eventually use, the Committee believes that the Washington cherry
industry desires flexibility in packaging dark-colored sweet cherries.
This action provides the industry with needed flexibility.
This rule not only finalizes the removal of the container
regulations (Sec. 923.322(d)), but also finalizes necessary conforming
changes through the removal of Sec. 923.322(b)(2)(i) and (ii), as well
as references to container requirements in Sec. 923.322(f)(1)(ii) and
Sec. 923.322(g).
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 1,500 cherry producers within the regulated
production area and approximately 53 regulated handlers. Small
agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration
(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000,
and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual
receipts are less than $6,500,000.
For the 2005 shipping season, the Washington Agricultural
Statistics Service prepared a preliminary report showing that the total
113,000 ton fresh market sweet cherry utilization sold for an average
of $2,830 per ton. Based on the number of producers in the production
area, the average producer revenue from the sale of sweet cherries in
2005 is estimated at approximately $213,200 per year. In addition, the
Committee reports that most of the industry's 53 handlers would have
each averaged gross receipts of less than $6,500,000 from the sale of
fresh sweet cherries last season. Thus, the majority of producers and
handlers of Washington sweet cherries may be classified as small
entities.
At its February 28, 2006, meeting the Committee recommended that
the container regulations in Sec. 923.322(d) be removed from the
order's rules and regulations. Section 923.52(a)(3) of the order
specifically authorizes the establishment of container regulations.
Further, Sec. 923.53 authorizes the modification, suspension, or
termination of regulations issued pursuant to Sec. 923.52. This
relaxation in the regulations provides handlers with the ability to
meet the rapidly changing wholesale, retail, and consumer demand for
innovative product packaging, thus enhancing industry marketing
flexibility and efficiency.
The Committee anticipates that this rule will not negatively impact
small businesses. This rule finalizes the removal of the container
requirements found under Sec. 923.322(d) of the order's rules and
regulations, and, thus, should provide the industry with greater
marketing opportunities. The Committee believes that any additional
costs this action may have on the industry would be associated with the
development and use of new containers. Such costs would likely be
offset by new marketing opportunities.
The Committee discussed alternatives to its recommendation to
remove the container regulations. The Committee explored the option of
leaving the container regulations intact without change. This option
was rejected as being an inadequate response to the demand for greater
flexibility in the packaging of fresh cherries. Temporary suspension of
the regulations was considered, and then discarded, as also being
inadequate for the current marketing situation.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large cherry handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sector agencies.
In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires Government agencies in general
to provide the public the option of submitting information or
transacting business electronically to the maximum extent possible.
The Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the
Washington cherry industry and all interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. Like all
Committee
[[Page 41725]]
meetings, the February 28, 2006, meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able to express their views on
this issue.
An interim final rule regarding this action was published in the
Federal Register on April 10, 2006. Committee staff ensured that copies
of the rule were made available to Committee members and Washington
sweet cherry industry members. In addition, the rule was made available
through the Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register.
The interim final rule provided for a 60-day comment period that ended
June 9, 2006. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the Committee's recommendation, and other information, it is found that
finalization of the interim final rule, without change, as published in
the Federal Register (71 FR 17982, April 10, 2006) will tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 923
Cherries, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 923--SWEET CHERRIES GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 923 which was
published at 71 FR 17982 on April 10, 2006, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
Dated: July 18, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E6-11736 Filed 7-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P