Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Airplanes, 41744-41745 [E6-11722]
Download as PDF
41744
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 141 / Monday, July 24, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034, February 26, 1979).
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Withdrawal
Accordingly, we withdraw the NPRM,
Docket No. FAA–2005–23007,
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–013–
AD, which was published in the Federal
Register on November 21, 2005 (70 FR
70048).
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 14,
2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–11711 Filed 7–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25421; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–074–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A310 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A310 airplanes. This
proposed AD would require revising the
Limitations section of the airplane flight
manual by incorporating restrictions for
high altitude operations. This proposed
AD results from several incidents of
pitch oscillations with high vertical
loads that occurred during turbulence at
high altitudes. We are proposing this
AD to prevent pitch oscillations during
turbulence, which could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 23, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:57 Jul 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France,
for service information identified in this
proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Backman, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055–4056; telephone
(425) 227–2797; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Comments Invited
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Temporary
Revision (TR) 2.03.00/21 to the Airbus
A310 Airplane Flight Manual (AFM).
The TR, dated April 11, 2005, defines
limitations on the flight envelope at
high altitudes in order to reduce the
risks of pitch over-control in case of
heavy turbulence. The DGAC approved
the TR and issued French airworthiness
directive F–2005–114, dated July 6,
2005, to ensure the continued
airworthiness of these airplanes in
France.
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2006–25421; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–074–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Discussion
´ ´
The Direction Generale de l’Aviation
Civile (DGAC), which is the
airworthiness authority for France,
notified us that an unsafe condition may
exist on all A310 airplanes. The DGAC
advises that several incidents of pitch
oscillations with high vertical loads
occurred during turbulence at high
altitudes. Investigation revealed that
this is due to a combination of certain
altitude and weight conditions when the
autopilot is disconnected or severe
turbulence is encountered. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in reduced controllability of the
airplane.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This airplane model is manufactured
in France and is type certificated for
operation in the United States under the
provisions of section 21.29 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.29) and the applicable bilateral
airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to
this bilateral airworthiness agreement,
the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. We
have examined the DGAC’s findings,
evaluated all pertinent information, and
determined that we need to issue an AD
for airplanes of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United
States.
Therefore, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the
actions specified in the service
information described previously,
except as discussed under ‘‘Difference
Between the Proposed AD and French
Airworthiness Directive.’’
Difference Between the Proposed AD
and French Airworthiness Directive
The proposed AD would differ from
the parallel French airworthiness
E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM
24JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 141 / Monday, July 24, 2006 / Proposed Rules
directive in that it would require
revising the AFM within 10 days after
the effective date of this AD. In
developing an appropriate compliance
time for this AD, the FAA considered
not only the DGAC’s recommendation of
revising the AFM as of the effective date
of the French airworthiness directive,
but the degree of urgency associated
with addressing the subject unsafe
condition, the average utilization of the
affected fleet, and the time necessary to
perform the revision (less than one
hour). In light of all of these factors, the
FAA finds a 10-day compliance time for
completing the required AFM revision
to be warranted, in that it represents an
appropriate interval of time allowable
for affected airplanes to continue to
operate without compromising safety.
Costs of Compliance
This proposed AD would affect about
62 airplanes of U.S. registry, it would
take approximately 1 work hour per
airplane to accomplish the proposed
AFM revision, at an average labor rate
of $80 per work hour. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the
proposed AD for U.S. operators is
$4,960, or $80 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:57 Jul 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2006–25421;
Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–074–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by August 23, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Airbus Model
A310 airplanes, certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from several incidents
of pitch oscillations with high vertical loads
that occurred during turbulence at high
altitudes. We are issuing this AD to prevent
pitch oscillations during turbulence, which
could result in reduced controllability of the
airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Revision of Airplane Flight Manual (AFM)
(f) Within 10 days after the effective date
of this AD, revise the Limitations section of
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41745
the Airbus A310 AFM to include the
information in Temporary Revision (TR)
2.03.00/21, dated April 11, 2005. This may be
done by inserting a copy of the TR into the
AFM. When the TR has been included in the
general revisions of the AFM, those general
revisions may be inserted into the AFM,
provided the relevant information in the
general revisions is identical to that in the
TR.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Related Information
(h) French airworthiness directive F–2005–
114, dated July 6, 2005, also addresses the
subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 14,
2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–11722 Filed 7–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25422; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–095–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model EMB–135 and
EMB–145, –145ER, –145MR, –145LR,
–145XR, –145MP, and –145EP
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
EMBRAER Model EMB–135 and EMB–
145, –145ER, –145MR, –145LR, –145XR,
–145MP, and –145EP airplanes. This
proposed AD would require inspecting
the fuel quantity indication system
(FQIS) wire harness and the DC fuel
pump wire harness to determine if the
harnesses are properly attached at their
respective attachment points and
E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM
24JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 141 (Monday, July 24, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41744-41745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11722]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-25421; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-074-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Airbus Model A310 airplanes. This proposed AD would require
revising the Limitations section of the airplane flight manual by
incorporating restrictions for high altitude operations. This proposed
AD results from several incidents of pitch oscillations with high
vertical loads that occurred during turbulence at high altitudes. We
are proposing this AD to prevent pitch oscillations during turbulence,
which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 23, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France, for service information identified in this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Backman, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2797; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2006-
25421; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-074-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after the Docket Management System
receives them.
Discussion
The Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC),
which is the airworthiness authority for France, notified us that an
unsafe condition may exist on all A310 airplanes. The DGAC advises that
several incidents of pitch oscillations with high vertical loads
occurred during turbulence at high altitudes. Investigation revealed
that this is due to a combination of certain altitude and weight
conditions when the autopilot is disconnected or severe turbulence is
encountered. This condition, if not corrected, could result in reduced
controllability of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Temporary Revision (TR) 2.03.00/21 to the Airbus
A310 Airplane Flight Manual (AFM). The TR, dated April 11, 2005,
defines limitations on the flight envelope at high altitudes in order
to reduce the risks of pitch over-control in case of heavy turbulence.
The DGAC approved the TR and issued French airworthiness directive F-
2005-114, dated July 6, 2005, to ensure the continued airworthiness of
these airplanes in France.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This airplane model is manufactured in France and is type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. We have examined the DGAC's findings,
evaluated all pertinent information, and determined that we need to
issue an AD for airplanes of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing the actions specified in the service information
described previously, except as discussed under ``Difference Between
the Proposed AD and French Airworthiness Directive.''
Difference Between the Proposed AD and French Airworthiness Directive
The proposed AD would differ from the parallel French airworthiness
[[Page 41745]]
directive in that it would require revising the AFM within 10 days
after the effective date of this AD. In developing an appropriate
compliance time for this AD, the FAA considered not only the DGAC's
recommendation of revising the AFM as of the effective date of the
French airworthiness directive, but the degree of urgency associated
with addressing the subject unsafe condition, the average utilization
of the affected fleet, and the time necessary to perform the revision
(less than one hour). In light of all of these factors, the FAA finds a
10-day compliance time for completing the required AFM revision to be
warranted, in that it represents an appropriate interval of time
allowable for affected airplanes to continue to operate without
compromising safety.
Costs of Compliance
This proposed AD would affect about 62 airplanes of U.S. registry,
it would take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish the
proposed AFM revision, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour.
Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the proposed AD for U.S.
operators is $4,960, or $80 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2006-25421; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-
074-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by August
23, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Airbus Model A310 airplanes,
certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from several incidents of pitch oscillations
with high vertical loads that occurred during turbulence at high
altitudes. We are issuing this AD to prevent pitch oscillations
during turbulence, which could result in reduced controllability of
the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Revision of Airplane Flight Manual (AFM)
(f) Within 10 days after the effective date of this AD, revise
the Limitations section of the Airbus A310 AFM to include the
information in Temporary Revision (TR) 2.03.00/21, dated April 11,
2005. This may be done by inserting a copy of the TR into the AFM.
When the TR has been included in the general revisions of the AFM,
those general revisions may be inserted into the AFM, provided the
relevant information in the general revisions is identical to that
in the TR.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Related Information
(h) French airworthiness directive F-2005-114, dated July 6,
2005, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 14, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-11722 Filed 7-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P