WTO Agricultural Safeguard Trigger Levels, 41756-41758 [06-6406]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
41756
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 141 / Monday, July 24, 2006 / Notices
Advisory Committee, which asked AMS
to identify commodities that needed
grade standards developed to facilitate
commerce. The proposed standards
would provide industry with a common
language and uniform basis for trading,
thus promoting the orderly and efficient
marketing of peppers that are not sweet
peppers.
DATES: Comments must be received by
September 22, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments to
the Standardization Section, Fresh
Products Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
1400 Independence Ave. SW., Room
1661, South Building, Stop 0240,
Washington, DC 20250–0240, fax (202)
720–8871, e-mail
FPB.DocketClerk@usda.gov. Comments
should make reference to the dates and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for
public inspection in the above office
during regular business hours and on
the Internet.
The draft of the proposed United
States Standards for Grades of Peppers
(Other Than Sweet Peppers) is available
either from the above address or by
accessing AMS, Fresh Products Branch
website at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/
fpbdocketlist.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cheri L. Emery, at the above address or
call (202) 720–2185, e-mail
Cheri.Emery@usda.gov.
Section
203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing Act
of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621–1627), as
amended, directs and authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture ‘‘To develop
and improve standards of quality,
condition, quantity, grade and
packaging and recommend and
demonstrate such standards in order to
encourage uniformity and consistency
in commercial practices.’’ AMS is
committed to carrying out this authority
in a manner that facilitates the
marketing of agricultural commodities
and makes copies of official standards
available upon request. The United
States Standards for Grades of Fruits
and Vegetables that are not
requirements of Federal Marketing
Orders or U.S. Import Requirements, no
longer appear in the Code of Federal
Regulations, but are maintained by
USDA, AMS, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs.
AMS is proposing to establish
voluntary United States Standards for
Grades of Peppers (Other Than Sweet
Peppers) using the procedures that
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Jul 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
appear in Part 36, Title 7 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (7 CFR part 36).
Background
At a meeting of the Fruit and
Vegetable Industry Advisory Committee,
AMS was asked to identify fresh fruit
and vegetables that may be better served
if grade standards are developed. As a
result, AMS identified peppers that
were not sweet peppers as possibly in
need of official grade standards. Such
standards are used by the fresh produce
industry to describe the product they
are trading, thus facilitating the
marketing of the product.
Prior to undertaking research and
other work associated to develop the
standards, AMS published a notice in
the Federal Register (71 FR 9514), on
February 24, 2006, soliciting comments
on the possible development of United
States Standards for Grades of Peppers
(Other Than Sweet Peppers). In
response to the request for comments,
AMS received two comments, one
comment was from an industry group,
and one from a pepper shipper. Both
comments were in support of
developing the standards. The
comments are available by accessing
AMS, Fresh Products Branch Web site:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fvfpbdocketlist.htm.
Based on the comments received and
information gathered, AMS has
developed proposed grade standards for
peppers other than sweet peppers. This
proposal would establish the following
grades, as well as a tolerance for each
grade: U.S. Fancy, U.S. No. 1 and U.S.
No. 2. In addition, there are proposed
‘‘Tolerances,’’ ‘‘Application of
Tolerances,’’ and ‘‘Size’’ sections. AMS
is proposing to define ‘‘Injury,’’
‘‘Damage,’’ and ‘‘Serious Damage,’’ with
specific basic requirements and
definitions for defects, along with
definitions for color, diameter, and
length. AMS is soliciting comments on
the proposed voluntary United States
Standards for Grades of Peppers (Other
Than Sweet Peppers).
The adoption of these proposed
standards would provide industry with
U.S. grade standards similar to those
extensively in use by the fresh produce
industry to assist in orderly marketing
of other commodities.
The official grade of a lot or shipment
of fresh vegetables covered by U.S.
standards is determined by the
procedures set forth in the Regulations
Governing Inspection, Certification, and
Standards of Fresh Fruits, Vegetables
and Other Products (Sec. 51.1 to 51.61).
This notice provides for a 60-day
comment period for interested parties to
comment on the proposed United States
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Standards for Grades of Peppers (Other
Than Sweet Peppers).
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
Dated: July 18, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E6–11740 Filed 7–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Foreign Agricultural Service
WTO Agricultural Safeguard Trigger
Levels
Foreign Agricultural Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice of product coverage and
trigger levels for safeguard measures
provided for in the World Trade
Organization (WTO) Agreement on
Agriculture.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice lists updated
quantity trigger levels for products,
which may be subject to additional
import duties under the safeguard
provisions of the WTO Agreement on
Agriculture. This notice also includes
the relevant period applicable for the
trigger levels on each of the listed
products.
Efffective Date: July 24, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles R. Bertsch, Multilateral Trade
Negotiations Division, Foreign
Agricultural Service, Room 5524—
South Building, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250
–1022, telephone at (202) 720–6278, or
e-mail charles.bertsch@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Article 5
of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture
provides that additional import duties
may be imposed on imports of products
subject to tariffication as a result of the
Uruguay Round if certain conditions are
met. The agreement permits additional
duties to be charged if the price of an
individual shipment of imported
products falls below the average price
for similar goods imported during the
years 1986–88 by a specified percentage.
It also permits additional duties to be
imposed if the volume of imports of an
article exceeds the average of the most
recent 3 years for which data are
available by 5, 10, or 25 percent,
depending on the article. These
additional duties may not be imposed
on quantities for which minimum or
current access commitments were made
during the Uruguay Round negotiations,
and only one type of safeguard, price or
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 141 / Monday, July 24, 2006 / Notices
quantity, may be applied at any given
time to an article.
Section 405 of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act requires that the
President cause to be published in the
Federal Register information regarding
the price and quantity safeguards,
including the quantity trigger levels,
which must be updated annually based
upon import levels during the most
recent 3 years. the President delegated
this duty to the Secretary of Agriculture
in Presidential Proclamation No. 6763,
QUANTITY-BASED SAFEGUARD
TRIGGER, dated December 23, 1994.
The Secretary of Agriculture further
delegated the duty to the Administrator
of the Foreign Agricultural Service (7
CFR 2.43 (a)(2)). The Annex to this
notice contains the updated quantity
trigger levels.
Additional information on the
products subject to safeguards and the
additional duties which may apply can
be found in subchapter IV of Chapter 99
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States and in the Secretary
of Agriculture’s Notice of Safeguard
Action, published in the Federal
Register at 60 FR 427, January 4, 1995.
Notice: As provided in section 405 of the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act, consistent
with Article 5 of the Agreement on
agriculture, the safeguard quantity trigger
levels previously notified are superceded by
the levels indicated in the Annex to this
notice. The definitions of these products
were provided in the Notice of Safeguard
Action published in the Federal Register, at
60 FR 427, January 4, 1995.
Issued at Washington, DC this 3rd day of
July, 2006.
Michael W. Yost.
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
ANNEX: QUANTITY-BASED SAFEGUARD TRIGGER
Product
Trigger level
Beef ...................................................................................
Mutton ...............................................................................
Cream ...............................................................................
Evaporated or Condensed Milk ........................................
Nonfat Dry Milk .................................................................
Dried Whole Milk ..............................................................
Dried Cream .....................................................................
Dried Whey/Buttermilk ......................................................
Butter ................................................................................
Butter Oil and Butter Substitutes ......................................
Dairy Mixtures ...................................................................
Blue Cheese .....................................................................
Cheddar Cheese ...............................................................
American-Type Cheese ....................................................
Edam/Gouda Cheese .......................................................
Italian-Type Cheese ..........................................................
Swiss Cheese with Eye Formation ...................................
Gruyere Process Cheese .................................................
Lowfat Cheese ..................................................................
NSPF Cheese ...................................................................
Peanuts .............................................................................
Peanut Butter/Paste ..........................................................
Raw Cane Sugar ..............................................................
447,684 mt .........................
3,242 mt .............................
4,298,187 liters ...................
6,930,879 kilograms ...........
898,525 kilograms ..............
3,987,868 kilograms ...........
40,235 kilograms ................
70,736 kilograms ................
11,548,913 kilograms .........
8,745,001 kilograms ...........
37,038,485 kilograms .........
5,047,654 kilograms ...........
12,356,363 kilograms .........
15,606,654 kilograms .........
8,318,776 kilograms ...........
23,130,918 kilograms .........
34,767,209 kilograms .........
8,355,381 kilograms ...........
3,603,811 kilograms ...........
55,111,280 kilograms .........
15,699 mt ...........................
3,637 mt .............................
1,096,324 mt ......................
1,172,199 mt ......................
36,661 mt ...........................
73,889 ................................
59 mt ..................................
36 mt ..................................
170 mt ................................
358 mt ................................
12,067 mt ...........................
18,297 mt ...........................
660 mt ................................
1,008 mt .............................
8,542,963 kilograms ...........
229,080 kilograms ..............
53,153 kilograms ................
78 mt ..................................
101 mt ................................
98 mt ..................................
0 mt ....................................
1,636, 297 liters .................
157,978 kilograms ..............
20,042 kilograms ................
29,945 kilograms ................
0 mt ....................................
0 mt ....................................
1,571,375 kilograms ...........
2,361,931 kilograms ...........
9,736,417 kilograms ...........
8,109,615 kilograms ...........
5,125 kilograms ..................
7,692 kilograms ..................
80,208 kilograms ................
Refined Sugar and Syrups ...............................................
Blended Syrups ................................................................
Articles Over 65% Sugar ..................................................
Articles Over 10% Sugar ..................................................
Sweetened Cocoa Powder ...............................................
Chocolate Crumb ..............................................................
Lowfat Chocolate Crumb ..................................................
Infant Formula Containing Oligosaccharides ....................
Mixes and Doughs ............................................................
Mixed Condiments and Seasonings .................................
Ice Cream .........................................................................
Animal Feed Containing Milk ............................................
Short Staple Cotton ..........................................................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Harsh or Rough Cotton ....................................................
Medium Staple Cotton ......................................................
Extra Long Staple Cotton .................................................
Cotton Waste ....................................................................
Cotton, Processed, Not Spun ...........................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Jul 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41757
Period
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006.
October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007.
October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006.
October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007.
October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006.
October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007.
October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006.
October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007.
October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006.
October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007.
October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006.
October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006.
October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007.
October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006.
October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
September 20, 2005 to September 19, 2006.
September 20, 2006 to September 19, 2007.
August 1, 2005 to July 31, 2006.
August 1, 2006 to July 31, 2007.
August 1, 2005 to July 31, 2006.
August 1, 2006 to July 31, 2007.
August 1, 2005 to July 31, 2006.
August 1, 2006 to July 31, 2007.
September 20, 2005 to September 19, 2006.
Sepember 20, 2006 to September 19, 2007.
September 11, 2005 to September 10, 2006.
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
41758
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 141 / Monday, July 24, 2006 / Notices
ANNEX: QUANTITY-BASED SAFEGUARD TRIGGER—Continued
Product
Trigger level
Period
26,883 kilograms ................
[FR Doc. 06–6406 Filed 7–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–10–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Information Collection; Request for
Comment; Public Attitudes, Beliefs,
and Values About National Forest
System Land Management
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice.
AGENCY:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Forest Service is seeking comments
from all interested individuals and
organizations on the new information
collection—Public Attitudes, Beliefs,
and Values About National Forest
System Land Management.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing on or before September 22, 2006
to be assured of consideration.
Comments received after that date will
be considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this
notice should be addressed to: Dr.
Daniel W. McCollum, Rocky Mountain
Research Station, 2150–A Centre Ave.,
Suite 350, Fort Collins, CO 80526.
Comments also may be submitted via
facsimile to (970) 295–5959 or by e-mail
to: dmccollum@fs.fed.us.
The public may inspect comments
received at Rocky Mountain Research
Station, 2150–A Centre Ave., Suite 350,
Fort Collins, CO 80526, Room 347
during normal business hours. Visitors
are encouraged to call ahead to (970)
295–5951 to facilitate entry to the
building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Daniel W. McCollum, Rocky Mountain
Research Station, (970) 295–5962.
Individuals who use TDD may call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–
877–8339, 24 hours a day, every day of
the year, including holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Public Attitudes, Beliefs, and
Values About National Forest System
Land Management.
OMB Number: 0596–New.
Type of Request: New.
Abstract: Surveys have been
developed for the purpose of providing
natural forest land managers and
planners with scientifically credible
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Jul 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
September 11, 2006 to September 10, 2007.
information from a broad and diverse
representation of the public, as well as
from specific stakeholder groups. The
intent of this collection is to obtain
information on public attitudes, beliefs,
and values that people have for public
land and public land use, how those
values are affected by public land
management, and acceptable tradeoffs
in developing alternative management
plans. This information is critical to
planning and implementing public
policy related to national forests in the
Southwestern Region.
Legal authority for information
collection in support of the forest plan
revision process in the Southwestern
Region comes from several sources: The
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, the National Forest Management
Act of 1976, and the 2005 NFMA
Planning Rule.
While social science and economic
analyses are not explicitly mentioned in
very many places, their use and
relevance is implied in many places in
natural resource management related
legislation. Social science and
economics can provide information
about public values, preferences, and
expectations that needs to be
incorporated into the planning and
decision making process. Further, social
science and economics can provide
qualitative and quantitative metrics
with which management alternatives
and agency performance can be
evaluated.
Data collected with these survey
instruments will provide a baseline
from which to monitor national forest
use and management as affected by
changes in social and economic
conditions. In addition, a comparison
between response rates to mail-based
and web-based surveys will be studied.
Estimate of Annual Burden: Mail or
web-based survey—30 minutes (20,000
respondents); telephone survey of nonrespondents to mail and web-based
survey—8 minutes (200 respondents).
Type of Respondents: General public
in two different geographical areas. A
region-wide survey (Regional Survey)
will be administered to the general
public within the administrative
boundaries of the Forest Service, Region
3 (New Mexico, Arizona, and a few
counties in Texas and Oklahoma). The
second survey (Test Survey) will be
administered to the general public in
areas specifically adjacent to four
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
national forests (two in New Mexico,
two in Arizona).
Estimated Annual Number of
Respondents: 20,200.
Estimated Annual Number of
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 10,027 burden hours
annually.
Comment is invited on: (1) Whether
this collection of information is
necessary for the stated purposes and
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical or
scientific utility; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
All comments received in response to
this notice, including names and
addresses when provided, will be a
matter of public record. Comments will
be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget approval.
Dated: July 17, 2006.
Frederick Norbury,
Associate Deputy Chief, NFS.
[FR Doc. E6–11677 Filed 7–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Information Collection; Request for
Comment; Visitor Permit and Visitor
Registration Card
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Forest Service is seeking comments
from all interested individuals and
organizations on the extension of
information collection 0596–0019
(Visitor Permit and Visitor Registration
Card). This information will help the
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 141 (Monday, July 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41756-41758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6406]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Foreign Agricultural Service
WTO Agricultural Safeguard Trigger Levels
AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of product coverage and trigger levels for safeguard
measures provided for in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement
on Agriculture.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice lists updated quantity trigger levels for
products, which may be subject to additional import duties under the
safeguard provisions of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture. This notice
also includes the relevant period applicable for the trigger levels on
each of the listed products.
DATES: Efffective Date: July 24, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles R. Bertsch, Multilateral Trade
Negotiations Division, Foreign Agricultural Service, Room 5524--South
Building, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250 -1022,
telephone at (202) 720-6278, or e-mail charles.bertsch@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Article 5 of the WTO Agreement on
Agriculture provides that additional import duties may be imposed on
imports of products subject to tariffication as a result of the Uruguay
Round if certain conditions are met. The agreement permits additional
duties to be charged if the price of an individual shipment of imported
products falls below the average price for similar goods imported
during the years 1986-88 by a specified percentage. It also permits
additional duties to be imposed if the volume of imports of an article
exceeds the average of the most recent 3 years for which data are
available by 5, 10, or 25 percent, depending on the article. These
additional duties may not be imposed on quantities for which minimum or
current access commitments were made during the Uruguay Round
negotiations, and only one type of safeguard, price or
[[Page 41757]]
quantity, may be applied at any given time to an article.
Section 405 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act requires that the
President cause to be published in the Federal Register information
regarding the price and quantity safeguards, including the quantity
trigger levels, which must be updated annually based upon import levels
during the most recent 3 years. the President delegated this duty to
the Secretary of Agriculture in Presidential Proclamation No. 6763,
QUANTITY-BASED SAFEGUARD TRIGGER, dated December 23, 1994. The
Secretary of Agriculture further delegated the duty to the
Administrator of the Foreign Agricultural Service (7 CFR 2.43 (a)(2)).
The Annex to this notice contains the updated quantity trigger levels.
Additional information on the products subject to safeguards and
the additional duties which may apply can be found in subchapter IV of
Chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States and
in the Secretary of Agriculture's Notice of Safeguard Action, published
in the Federal Register at 60 FR 427, January 4, 1995.
Notice: As provided in section 405 of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act, consistent with Article 5 of the Agreement on
agriculture, the safeguard quantity trigger levels previously
notified are superceded by the levels indicated in the Annex to this
notice. The definitions of these products were provided in the
Notice of Safeguard Action published in the Federal Register, at 60
FR 427, January 4, 1995.
Issued at Washington, DC this 3rd day of July, 2006.
Michael W. Yost.
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
Annex: Quantity-Based Safeguard Trigger
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product Trigger level Period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beef.......................... 447,684 mt....... January 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006.
Mutton........................ 3,242 mt......... January 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006.
Cream......................... 4,298,187 liters. January 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006.
Evaporated or Condensed Milk.. 6,930,879 January 1, 2006 to
kilograms. December 31, 2006.
Nonfat Dry Milk............... 898,525 kilograms January 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006.
Dried Whole Milk.............. 3,987,868 January 1, 2006 to
kilograms. December 31, 2006.
Dried Cream................... 40,235 kilograms. January 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006.
Dried Whey/Buttermilk......... 70,736 kilograms. January 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006.
Butter........................ 11,548,913 January 1, 2006 to
kilograms. December 31, 2006.
Butter Oil and Butter 8,745,001 January 1, 2006 to
Substitutes. kilograms. December 31, 2006.
Dairy Mixtures................ 37,038,485 January 1, 2006 to
kilograms. December 31, 2006.
Blue Cheese................... 5,047,654 January 1, 2006 to
kilograms. December 31, 2006.
Cheddar Cheese................ 12,356,363 January 1, 2006 to
kilograms. December 31, 2006.
American-Type Cheese.......... 15,606,654 January 1, 2006 to
kilograms. December 31, 2006.
Edam/Gouda Cheese............. 8,318,776 January 1, 2006 to
kilograms. December 31, 2006.
Italian-Type Cheese........... 23,130,918 January 1, 2006 to
kilograms. December 31, 2006.
Swiss Cheese with Eye 34,767,209 January 1, 2006 to
Formation. kilograms. December 31, 2006.
Gruyere Process Cheese........ 8,355,381 January 1, 2006 to
kilograms. December 31, 2006.
Lowfat Cheese................. 3,603,811 January 1, 2006 to
kilograms. December 31, 2006.
NSPF Cheese................... 55,111,280 January 1, 2006 to
kilograms. December 31, 2006.
Peanuts....................... 15,699 mt........ April 1, 2006 to
March 31, 2007.
Peanut Butter/Paste........... 3,637 mt......... January 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006.
Raw Cane Sugar................ 1,096,324 mt..... October 1, 2005 to
September 30, 2006.
1,172,199 mt..... October 1, 2006 to
September 30, 2007.
Refined Sugar and Syrups...... 36,661 mt........ October 1, 2005 to
September 30, 2006.
73,889........... October 1, 2006 to
September 30, 2007.
Blended Syrups................ 59 mt............ October 1, 2005 to
September 30, 2006.
36 mt............ October 1, 2006 to
September 30, 2007.
Articles Over 65% Sugar....... 170 mt........... October 1, 2005 to
September 30, 2006.
358 mt........... October 1, 2006 to
September 30, 2007.
Articles Over 10% Sugar....... 12,067 mt........ October 1, 2005 to
September 30, 2006.
18,297 mt........ October 1, 2006 to
September 30, 2007.
Sweetened Cocoa Powder........ 660 mt........... October 1, 2005 to
September 30, 2006.
1,008 mt......... October 1, 2006 to
September 30, 2007.
Chocolate Crumb............... 8,542,963 January 1, 2006 to
kilograms. December 31, 2006.
Lowfat Chocolate Crumb........ 229,080 kilograms January 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006.
Infant Formula Containing 53,153 kilograms. January 1, 2006 to
Oligosaccharides. December 31, 2006.
Mixes and Doughs.............. 78 mt............ October 1, 2005 to
September 30, 2006.
101 mt........... October 1, 2006 to
September 30, 2007.
Mixed Condiments and 98 mt............ October 1, 2005 to
Seasonings. September 30, 2006.
0 mt............. October 1, 2006 to
September 30, 2007.
Ice Cream..................... 1,636, 297 liters January 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006.
Animal Feed Containing Milk... 157,978 kilograms January 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006.
Short Staple Cotton........... 20,042 kilograms. September 20, 2005 to
September 19, 2006.
29,945 kilograms. September 20, 2006 to
September 19, 2007.
Harsh or Rough Cotton......... 0 mt............. August 1, 2005 to
July 31, 2006.
0 mt............. August 1, 2006 to
July 31, 2007.
Medium Staple Cotton.......... 1,571,375 August 1, 2005 to
kilograms. July 31, 2006.
2,361,931 August 1, 2006 to
kilograms. July 31, 2007.
Extra Long Staple Cotton...... 9,736,417 August 1, 2005 to
kilograms. July 31, 2006.
8,109,615 August 1, 2006 to
kilograms. July 31, 2007.
Cotton Waste.................. 5,125 kilograms.. September 20, 2005 to
September 19, 2006.
7,692 kilograms.. Sepember 20, 2006 to
September 19, 2007.
Cotton, Processed, Not Spun... 80,208 kilograms. September 11, 2005 to
September 10, 2006.
[[Page 41758]]
26,883 kilograms. September 11, 2006 to
September 10, 2007.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 06-6406 Filed 7-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-M
