Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement on Transit Improvements for the Gold Line Corridor, 41508-41509 [E6-11629]
Download as PDF
41508
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 140 / Friday, July 21, 2006 / Notices
SYSTEMS EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS
OF THE ACT:
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(6)
records in this system of records may be
exempted from 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3).(d).(e)(l).(e)(4)(G). (H). and (I)
and (f). L/LM will review at clearance
per Brian Egan.
[FR Doc. E6–11632 Filed 7–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Preparation of an Environmental
Impact Statement on Transit
Improvements for the Gold Line
Corridor
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), U.S. Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of intent to Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_1
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) and the Denver
Regional Transportation District (RTD),
in cooperation with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the
Colorado Department of Transportation
(CDOT), will prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the
impacts of rail transit improvements for
the Gold Line Corridor which extends
from downtown Denver, Colorado west
to Ward Road in Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
The EIS will be prepared in accordance
with regulations implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), as well as provisions of the
recently enacted Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act: A Legacy of Users. The purpose of
this Notice of Intent is to alert interested
parties regarding the plan to prepare the
EIS, to provide information on the
nature of the proposed transit project, to
invite participation in the EIS process,
including comments on the scope of the
EIS proposed in this notice, and to
announce that public scoping meetings
will be conducted.
DATES: Written comments on the scope
of the EIS should be sent to Dave Hollis,
RTD Project Manager, by September 25,
2006. Public scoping meetings will be
held on August 22nd and 23rd from
5:30 p.m. to 8:15 p.m. at the locations
indicated below.
An interagency scoping meeting will
be scheduled after agencies with an
interest in the proposed project have
been identified.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
scope of the EIS should be sent to Dave
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:59 Jul 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
Hollis, Gold Line Corridor Project
Manager, Denver Regional
Transportation District (RTD), 1560
Broadway, Suite 700, Denver, CO 80202.
Comments may also be offered at the
public scoping meetings. The addresses
for the public scoping meetings are as
follows:
Tuesday, August 22, Arvada Center,
6901 Wadsworth Blvd., Arvada, CO
80003.
Wednesday, August 23, Highlands
Masonic Center, 3550 Federal Blvd.,
Denver, CO 80211.
For more information for special
assistance needs for the scoping
meetings, please contact Dave Hollis at
(303) 299–2404 at least 48 hours before
the meeting. All meetings will be
conducted in wheelchair accessible
locations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David Beckhouse, Community Planner,
Federal Transit Administration, Region
VIII, 12300 West Dakota Ave., Suite 310,
Lakewood, CO 80228–2583, (720) 963–
3306.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Proposed Project: The project
extends 11 miles from Denver Union
Station (DUS) in downtown Denver to
Wheat Ridge. The project proposes
stations at W. 38th Avenue, Pecos
Street, Federal Boulevard, Sheridan
Boulevard, Olde Town, Arvada Ridge,
and Ward Road.
Purposes of and Need for the
Proposed Project: The Gold Line area is
forecast to be one of the fastest growing
areas of the region over the next 20
years. Growth rates for both population
and employment are forecast to increase
significantly by 2030. Congestion along
north I–25 and I–70 West is already
severe, with forecasts indicating
increasing severity and duration of
congestion. In addition to increasing
congestion, access through and from the
corridor area to other areas in the metro
region is difficult. Many roadways are
not continuous, requiring circuitous
travel. Existing transit service in the
area is minimal and often requires a
transfer in Downtown Denver for service
to other areas. The project will provide
a new rail transportation facility to
improve local and regional mobility and
accessibility for the west metropolitan
area.
This transit project is included as part
of RTD’s FasTracks Program, a 12-year
comprehensive plan for transit service
and facilities in the Denver region. The
FasTracks Plan is a $4.7 billion program
that was endorsed by the voters of the
Denver metropolitan area in 2004. The
voters of the region approved an
increase in the regional sales and use
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
tax from 0.6% to 1.0% in order to
provide for the expedited build out of
the transit system. FasTracks includes a
funding plan for 119 new miles of rail
transit, 18 miles of bus rapid transit,
21,000 new spaces in park n Rides and
significant improvements to the bus
system. The FasTracks projects have
been adopted in the current Denver area
Regional Transportation Plan.
Alternatives: The NEPA scoping
process will include an evaluation of
the results of the MIS conducted by RTD
between 1998 and 2000 as well as the
Three Corridors Scoping Study that was
completed in October 2005. The locally
preferred alternative (LPA) of the MIS
was LRT on the BNSF alignment (or
Gold Line alignment) from DUS to Ward
Road. These recommendations were
approved by the Denver Regional
Council of Governments and included
in the fiscally constrained Regional
Transportation Plan (RTP) and the
MetroVision 2030 Master Plan.
FTA and RTD propose that the EIS
evaluate the following alternatives:
The No-Action alternative is the
option of implementing nothing more
than the existing and committed road
and transit improvements.
The Transportation System
Management (TSM) alternative includes
various transportation improvements
beyond the existing and committed
projects plus enhanced bus transit
service in the Gold Line Corridor.
The MIS LPA will be evaluated as the
proposed project. The EIS will also
consider any additional reasonable
alternatives identified during scoping
that provide similar transportation
benefits while reducing or avoiding
adverse impacts.
The EIS Process and the Role of
Participating Agencies and the Public:
The purpose of the EIS process is to
explore in a public setting potentially
significant effects of implementing the
proposed action and alternatives on the
physical, human, and natural
environment. Areas of investigation
include, but are not limited to, land use,
development potential, land acquisition
and displacements, historic resources,
visual and aesthetic qualities, air
quality, noise and vibration, energy use,
safety and security, and ecosystems,
including threatened and endangered
species. Measures to avoid, minimize, or
mitigate any significant adverse impacts
will be identified. Regulations
implementing NEPA, as well as
provisions of the recently enacted Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU), call for public
involvement in the EIS process. Section
6002 of SAFETEA–LU requires that FTA
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 140 / Friday, July 21, 2006 / Notices
and RTD do the following: (1) Extend an
invitation to other Federal and nonFederal agencies and Indian tribes that
may have an interest in the proposed
project to become ‘‘participating
agencies,’’ (2) provide an opportunity
for involvement by participating
agencies and the public in helping to
define the purpose and need for a
proposed project, as well as the range of
alternatives for consideration in the
impact statement, and (3) establish a
plan for coordinating public and agency
participation in and comment on the
environmental review process. An
invitation to become a participating
agency, with the scoping information
packet appended, will be extended to
other Federal and non-Federal agencies
and Indian tribes that may have an
interest in the proposed project. It is
possible that we may not be able to
identify all Federal and non-Federal
agencies and Indian tribes that may
have such an interest. Any Federal or
non-Federal agency or Indian tribe
interested in the proposed project that
does not receive an invitation to become
a participating agency should notify at
the earliest opportunity the Project
Manager identified above under
ADDRESSES.
A comprehensive public involvement
program will be developed and a public
and agency involvement Coordination
Plan will be created. The program will
include outreach to local and county
officials and community and civic
groups; a public scoping process to
define the issues of concern among all
parties interested in the project;
organizing periodic meetings with
various local agencies, organizations
and committees; a public hearing on
release of the draft environmental
impact statement (DEIS); and
development and distribution of project
newsletters.
The purposes of and need for the
proposed project have been
preliminarily identified in this notice.
We invite the public and participating
agencies to consider the preliminary
statement of purposes of and need for
the proposed project, as well as the
alternatives proposed for consideration.
Suggestions for modifications to the
statement of purposes of and need for
the proposed project and any other
alternatives that meet the purposes of
and need for the proposed project are
welcomed and will be given serious
consideration. Comments on potentially
significant environmental impacts that
may be associated with the proposed
project and alternatives are also
welcomed. There will be additional
opportunities to participate in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:59 Jul 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
scoping process at the public meetings
announced in this notice.
In accordance with 23 CFR 771.105(a)
and 771.133, FTA will comply with all
Federal environmental laws,
regulations, and executive orders
applicable to the proposed project
during the environmental review
process to the maximum extent
practicable. These requirements
include, but are not limited to, the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality and FTA
implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts
1500–1508, and 23 CFR part 771), the
project-level air quality conformity
regulation of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) (40 CFR part
93), the section 404(b)(1) guidelines of
EPA (40 CFR part 230), the regulation
implementing section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (36
CFR part 800), the regulation
implementing section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (50 CFR part
402), section 4(f) of the DOT Act (23
CFR 771.135), and Executive Orders
12898 on environmental justice, 11988
on floodplain management, and 11990
on wetlands.
In accordance with 36 CFR 800.8(c),
RTD will utilize the NEPA/Section 106
merger process for documentation to
comply with section 106. RTD will
utilize the Memorandum of Agreement
between the FTA, Region VIII and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),
dated January, 2006 for documentation
to comply with section 404 mandates.
In addition, RTD may seek Section
5309 New Starts funding for the project.
As provided in the FTA New Starts
regulation (49 CFR part 611), New Starts
funding requires the submission of
certain specific information to FTA to
support a request to initiate preliminary
engineering, which is normally done in
conjunction with the NEPA process.
Issued on: July 13, 2006.
Lee O. Waddleton,
Regional Administrator, Region VIII, Federal
Transit Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–11629 Filed 7–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41509
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket Nos. NHTSA–2003–15428 and
NHTSA–2003–16401]
Decision That Nonconforming 2002
Through 2004 Smart Car Fortwo Coupe
and Cabriolet (Including Trim Levels
Passion, Pulse and Pure) Passenger
Cars Are Eligible for Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of decision by the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration that nonconforming
2002 through 2004 Smart Car Fortwo
Coupe and Cabriolet (including trim
levels Passion, Pulse and Pure)
passenger cars are eligible for
importation.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
decision by NHTSA that 2002 through
2004 Smart Car Fortwo Coupe and
Cabriolet (including trim levels Passion,
Pulse and Pure) passenger cars not
originally manufactured to comply with
all applicable Federal motor vehicle
safety standards (FMVSS) are eligible
for importation into the United States
because they have safety features that
comply with, or are capable of being
altered to comply with, all applicable
FMVSS.
This decision was effective
January 1, 2004. The agency notified the
petitioners at that time that the subject
vehicles are eligible for importation.
This document provides public notice
of the eligibility decision.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for importation into and sale in the
United States, certified as required
under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same
model year as the model of the motor
vehicle to be compared, and is capable
of being readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
Where there is no substantially
similar U.S.-certified motor vehicle, 49
U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) permits a
nonconforming motor vehicle to be
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 140 (Friday, July 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41508-41509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11629]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement on Transit
Improvements for the Gold Line Corridor
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), U.S. Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Denver
Regional Transportation District (RTD), in cooperation with the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Colorado Department of
Transportation (CDOT), will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) to evaluate the impacts of rail transit improvements for the Gold
Line Corridor which extends from downtown Denver, Colorado west to Ward
Road in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The EIS will be prepared in accordance
with regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), as well as provisions of the recently enacted Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy of
Users. The purpose of this Notice of Intent is to alert interested
parties regarding the plan to prepare the EIS, to provide information
on the nature of the proposed transit project, to invite participation
in the EIS process, including comments on the scope of the EIS proposed
in this notice, and to announce that public scoping meetings will be
conducted.
DATES: Written comments on the scope of the EIS should be sent to Dave
Hollis, RTD Project Manager, by September 25, 2006. Public scoping
meetings will be held on August 22nd and 23rd from 5:30 p.m. to 8:15
p.m. at the locations indicated below.
An interagency scoping meeting will be scheduled after agencies
with an interest in the proposed project have been identified.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope of the EIS should be sent to
Dave Hollis, Gold Line Corridor Project Manager, Denver Regional
Transportation District (RTD), 1560 Broadway, Suite 700, Denver, CO
80202. Comments may also be offered at the public scoping meetings. The
addresses for the public scoping meetings are as follows:
Tuesday, August 22, Arvada Center, 6901 Wadsworth Blvd., Arvada, CO
80003.
Wednesday, August 23, Highlands Masonic Center, 3550 Federal Blvd.,
Denver, CO 80211.
For more information for special assistance needs for the scoping
meetings, please contact Dave Hollis at (303) 299-2404 at least 48
hours before the meeting. All meetings will be conducted in wheelchair
accessible locations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Beckhouse, Community
Planner, Federal Transit Administration, Region VIII, 12300 West Dakota
Ave., Suite 310, Lakewood, CO 80228-2583, (720) 963-3306.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Proposed Project: The project extends 11 miles from Denver
Union Station (DUS) in downtown Denver to Wheat Ridge. The project
proposes stations at W. 38th Avenue, Pecos Street, Federal Boulevard,
Sheridan Boulevard, Olde Town, Arvada Ridge, and Ward Road.
Purposes of and Need for the Proposed Project: The Gold Line area
is forecast to be one of the fastest growing areas of the region over
the next 20 years. Growth rates for both population and employment are
forecast to increase significantly by 2030. Congestion along north I-25
and I-70 West is already severe, with forecasts indicating increasing
severity and duration of congestion. In addition to increasing
congestion, access through and from the corridor area to other areas in
the metro region is difficult. Many roadways are not continuous,
requiring circuitous travel. Existing transit service in the area is
minimal and often requires a transfer in Downtown Denver for service to
other areas. The project will provide a new rail transportation
facility to improve local and regional mobility and accessibility for
the west metropolitan area.
This transit project is included as part of RTD's FasTracks
Program, a 12-year comprehensive plan for transit service and
facilities in the Denver region. The FasTracks Plan is a $4.7 billion
program that was endorsed by the voters of the Denver metropolitan area
in 2004. The voters of the region approved an increase in the regional
sales and use tax from 0.6% to 1.0% in order to provide for the
expedited build out of the transit system. FasTracks includes a funding
plan for 119 new miles of rail transit, 18 miles of bus rapid transit,
21,000 new spaces in park n Rides and significant improvements to the
bus system. The FasTracks projects have been adopted in the current
Denver area Regional Transportation Plan.
Alternatives: The NEPA scoping process will include an evaluation
of the results of the MIS conducted by RTD between 1998 and 2000 as
well as the Three Corridors Scoping Study that was completed in October
2005. The locally preferred alternative (LPA) of the MIS was LRT on the
BNSF alignment (or Gold Line alignment) from DUS to Ward Road. These
recommendations were approved by the Denver Regional Council of
Governments and included in the fiscally constrained Regional
Transportation Plan (RTP) and the MetroVision 2030 Master Plan.
FTA and RTD propose that the EIS evaluate the following
alternatives:
The No-Action alternative is the option of implementing nothing
more than the existing and committed road and transit improvements.
The Transportation System Management (TSM) alternative includes
various transportation improvements beyond the existing and committed
projects plus enhanced bus transit service in the Gold Line Corridor.
The MIS LPA will be evaluated as the proposed project. The EIS will
also consider any additional reasonable alternatives identified during
scoping that provide similar transportation benefits while reducing or
avoiding adverse impacts.
The EIS Process and the Role of Participating Agencies and the
Public: The purpose of the EIS process is to explore in a public
setting potentially significant effects of implementing the proposed
action and alternatives on the physical, human, and natural
environment. Areas of investigation include, but are not limited to,
land use, development potential, land acquisition and displacements,
historic resources, visual and aesthetic qualities, air quality, noise
and vibration, energy use, safety and security, and ecosystems,
including threatened and endangered species. Measures to avoid,
minimize, or mitigate any significant adverse impacts will be
identified. Regulations implementing NEPA, as well as provisions of the
recently enacted Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation
Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), call for public
involvement in the EIS process. Section 6002 of SAFETEA-LU requires
that FTA
[[Page 41509]]
and RTD do the following: (1) Extend an invitation to other Federal and
non-Federal agencies and Indian tribes that may have an interest in the
proposed project to become ``participating agencies,'' (2) provide an
opportunity for involvement by participating agencies and the public in
helping to define the purpose and need for a proposed project, as well
as the range of alternatives for consideration in the impact statement,
and (3) establish a plan for coordinating public and agency
participation in and comment on the environmental review process. An
invitation to become a participating agency, with the scoping
information packet appended, will be extended to other Federal and non-
Federal agencies and Indian tribes that may have an interest in the
proposed project. It is possible that we may not be able to identify
all Federal and non-Federal agencies and Indian tribes that may have
such an interest. Any Federal or non-Federal agency or Indian tribe
interested in the proposed project that does not receive an invitation
to become a participating agency should notify at the earliest
opportunity the Project Manager identified above under ADDRESSES.
A comprehensive public involvement program will be developed and a
public and agency involvement Coordination Plan will be created. The
program will include outreach to local and county officials and
community and civic groups; a public scoping process to define the
issues of concern among all parties interested in the project;
organizing periodic meetings with various local agencies, organizations
and committees; a public hearing on release of the draft environmental
impact statement (DEIS); and development and distribution of project
newsletters.
The purposes of and need for the proposed project have been
preliminarily identified in this notice. We invite the public and
participating agencies to consider the preliminary statement of
purposes of and need for the proposed project, as well as the
alternatives proposed for consideration. Suggestions for modifications
to the statement of purposes of and need for the proposed project and
any other alternatives that meet the purposes of and need for the
proposed project are welcomed and will be given serious consideration.
Comments on potentially significant environmental impacts that may be
associated with the proposed project and alternatives are also
welcomed. There will be additional opportunities to participate in the
scoping process at the public meetings announced in this notice.
In accordance with 23 CFR 771.105(a) and 771.133, FTA will comply
with all Federal environmental laws, regulations, and executive orders
applicable to the proposed project during the environmental review
process to the maximum extent practicable. These requirements include,
but are not limited to, the regulations of the Council on Environmental
Quality and FTA implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508, and 23 CFR
part 771), the project-level air quality conformity regulation of the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (40 CFR part 93), the
section 404(b)(1) guidelines of EPA (40 CFR part 230), the regulation
implementing section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (36
CFR part 800), the regulation implementing section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act (50 CFR part 402), section 4(f) of the DOT Act (23 CFR
771.135), and Executive Orders 12898 on environmental justice, 11988 on
floodplain management, and 11990 on wetlands.
In accordance with 36 CFR 800.8(c), RTD will utilize the NEPA/
Section 106 merger process for documentation to comply with section
106. RTD will utilize the Memorandum of Agreement between the FTA,
Region VIII and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), dated
January, 2006 for documentation to comply with section 404 mandates.
In addition, RTD may seek Section 5309 New Starts funding for the
project. As provided in the FTA New Starts regulation (49 CFR part
611), New Starts funding requires the submission of certain specific
information to FTA to support a request to initiate preliminary
engineering, which is normally done in conjunction with the NEPA
process.
Issued on: July 13, 2006.
Lee O. Waddleton,
Regional Administrator, Region VIII, Federal Transit Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-11629 Filed 7-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P