Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Duwamish Waterway, Seattle, WA, 40916-40918 [E6-11378]
Download as PDF
40916
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Inner Harbor from shoreline to
shoreline, bounded on the east by a line
drawn along longitude 076°36′30″ West.
All coordinates reference Datum NAD
1983.
(b) Special local regulations: (1)
Except for event participants and
persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area shall: (i) Stop the vessel
immediately when directed to do so by
any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official
Patrol.
(iii) When authorized to transit the
regulated area, all vessels shall proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course that minimizes
wake near the race course.
(c) Effective period. This section will
be enforced from 5:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.
on September 9, 2006.
Dated: July 6, 2006.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–11377 Filed 7–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD13–06–015]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Duwamish Waterway, Seattle, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
temporarily revising the operating
regulations for the First Avenue South
dual drawbridges across the Duwamish
Waterway, mile 2.5, at Seattle,
Washington. The change will enable the
bridge owner to keep the bridges closed
during night hours for a period longer
than 60 days. This will facilitate
painting the structure while properly
containing debris and paint.
DATES: This temporary rule is effective
from July 15 to September 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket CG13–06–015
and are available for inspection or
copying at the office of Commander
(dpw), 13th Coast Guard District, 915
Second Avenue, Seattle, WA 98174–
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Jul 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
Background and Purpose
the channel spans. When the drawspans
are open there is unlimited vertical
clearance for the central 120 feet of the
spans. An adjacent, parallel bascule
bridge was constructed and completed
in 1999. Drawbridge openings are
provided for recreational vessels, large
barges, and floating construction
equipment. The operating regulations
currently in effect for these drawbridges
at 33 Code of Federal Regulations
117.1041 provide that the spans need
not open for the passage of vessels from
6 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 3 p.m. to 6
p.m. Monday through Friday, except for
Federal holidays. The draws shall open
at any time for a vessel of 5,000 gross
tons and over and for a vessel towing
such a vessel or en route to take in tow
a vessel of that size.
The temporary rule will enable the
owner to paint the structure after
preparing the surfaces of the steel truss
beneath the roadway. All of this work
must be accomplished within a
containment system that permits no
material to fall into the waterway. This
containment system will have to be
modified for drawspan openings.
The temporary closed period is from
9 p.m. to 5 a.m. Sunday through Friday
from July 15 to September 30, 2006.
This operating scheme was authorized
last year for the same purpose and
generated no objections or complaints
from waterway users.
Our previous analysis indicated that
most vessel operators will not be
inconvenienced by the hours of
temporary closure. This conclusion
seems to have been borne out as no
complaints were received during the
previous season of work. Others would
receive enough notice to plan trips at
other hours. Vessel traffic includes
tugboats, barges, derrick barges,
sailboats and motorized recreational
boats including large yachts. The
majority of vessels pass through the
dual bascule spans during hours other
than those affected night hours.
First Avenue South is a heavily
traveled commuter arterial that serves
Boeing Company plants and other
industrial facilities in south Seattle. The
dual bascule spans need not open for
the passage of vessels from 6 a.m. to 9
a.m. and from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. Monday
through Friday. Vessels of 5000 gross
tons or more are exempted from these
closed periods. However, vessels of this
size infrequently ply this reach of the
waterway. The dual spans open an
average of four times a day.
The dual First Avenue South
drawbridges provide 32 feet of vertical
clearance at mean high water for the
central 100 feet of horizontal distance in
Discussion of Comments and Changes
No comments or letters were received
in response to the NPRM. No changes to
the proposed regulation were made.
1067 between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Austin Pratt, Chief Bridge Section,
Commander (dpw), 13th Coast Guard
District, 915 Second Avenue, Seattle,
WA 98174–1067, (206) 220–7282.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On May 24, 2006, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Drawbridge Operation
Regulations; Duwamish River, Seattle,
Washington’’ in the Federal Register (71
FR 29871). We received no letters
commenting on the proposed rule. No
public meeting was requested, and none
was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication of this temporary
final rule in the Federal Register, as is
normally required by the Administrative
Procedure Act. The Coast Guard
experienced administrative problems
that made compliance with the 30-day
rule impracticable within the work
schedule that the bridge owner had
previously set. Compliance with the 30day rule would require rescheduling the
repair work, perhaps for a significant
amount of time. Timely maintenance of
the heavily-used First Avenue South
bridges helps preserve the safety of
these spans. Thus, a delay of scheduled
maintenance would be contrary to the
public interest. Moreover, compliance
with the 30-day rule at the expense of
delaying scheduled maintenance is
unnecessary. Temporary deviations
from drawbridge schedules for repair or
maintenance are already authorized, for
periods not to exceed 60 days, by 33
CFR 117.35(d). In this case, the bridge
repairs will not pass the 60-day mark
until mid-September, by which time
this temporary final rule will have been
published for far more than 30 days. In
addition, our May 24, 2006 NPRM
alerted the public to our intention to
modify the drawbridge schedule, and
the NPRM received no adverse
comment. Vessels large enough to
require opening of these spans use the
Duwamish Waterway only infrequently.
Steps have been taken to notify affected
vessels that the drawbridge schedule is
being altered, via publication in a local
notice to mariners.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19JYR1.SGM
19JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. Most vessels will
be able to plan transits to avoid the
closed periods. Most commercial vessel
owners have indicated that they can
tolerate the proposed hours by working
around them. Saturdays will enjoy
normal operations, lessening
inconvenience to sailboats.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This may affect some recreational
sailboat owners insofar as they must
return by 9 p.m. or wait until 5 a.m. to
regain moorage above the drawbridges.
We expect these to be few in number.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with RULES
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Jul 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Austin Pratt,
Chief, Bridge Section, at (206) 220–
7282.
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule would not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40917
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
not designated this as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e) of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. There are no expected
environmental consequences of the
proposed action that would require
further analysis and documentation.
E:\FR\FM\19JYR1.SGM
19JYR1
40918
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
I
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
Stat. 5039.
2. From 9 p.m. July 15 to 5 a.m.
September 30, 2006, in § 117.1041,
suspend paragraph (a)(1) and add a new
paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:
I
§ 117.1041
Duwamish Waterway.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) From Monday through Friday,
except all Federal holidays but
Columbus Day, the draws of the First
Avenue South Bridges, mile 2.5, need
not be opened for the passage of vessels
from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 3 p.m.
to 6 p.m., except during these hours:
The draws shall open at any time for a
vessel of 5000 gross tons and over, a
vessel towing a 5000 gross tons and
over, and a vessel proceeding to pick up
for towing a vessel of 5000 gross tons
and over. From July 15 to September 30,
2006, Sunday through Friday, the draws
need not be opened for the passage of
any vessels from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 10, 2006.
R.R. Houck,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, District
Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–11378 Filed 7–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP St. Petersburg 06–089]
RIN 1625–AA00
mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with RULES
Safety Zone; John’s Pass, Tampa Bay,
FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of Tampa Bay, Florida in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Jul 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
vicinity of the John’s Pass Bascule
Bridge. This safety zone is being
established to protect mariners from the
hazards associated with the blasting
demolition of the concrete portions of
the John’s Pass Bascule Bridge. This rule
is necessary to provide for the safety of
life on the navigable waters of the
United States.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m.
on July 10, 2006 through 7 p.m. on
September 15, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of the docket [COTP St.
Petersburg 06–089] and are available for
inspection or copying at Coast Guard
Sector St. Petersburg, Prevention
Department, 155 Columbia Drive,
Tampa, Florida 33606–3598 between
7:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Waterways Management Division at
Coast Guard Sector St. Petersburg,
Prevention Department, (813) 228–2191
Ext. 8307.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The
necessary details for the blasting
demolition of the John’s Pass Bascule
Bridge were not provided with
sufficient time remaining to publish an
NPRM. Publishing an NPRM and
delaying its effective date would be
contrary to the public interest since
immediate action is needed to minimize
potential danger to the public during the
blasting demolition of the John’s Pass
Bascule Bridge. The Coast Guard will
issue a broadcast notice to mariners to
advise mariners of the restriction along
with Coast Guard assets and/or Pinellas
County Sheriff marine unit on scene
who will also provide notice of the
safety zone to mariners.
For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
Flatiron Construction was contracted
to build a new Bascule at John’s Pass
and remove the existing Bridge. A
meeting was held on April 13, 2006 to
address the blasting of the concrete
supports of the Bascule Bridge directly
adjacent to the navigation channel.
Flatiron will conduct two separate
blasts on two different days to break the
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
concrete supports into smaller sections
for removal. The blasts are tentatively
scheduled for July 28, 2006 at
approximately 8 a.m., and August 25,
2006 at approximately 8 a.m. Both blasts
will fracture the remaining concrete
portions of the bridge supports below
the waterline. The use of explosives and
the proximity of the supports to the
navigable channel present a hazard to
mariners transiting the area. This safety
zone is being established to ensure the
safety of life on the navigable waters of
the United States and, as such, the
safety zone will be enforced for
approximately two hours on days on
which blasts will take place.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone will extend out from
the John’s Pass Bascule Bridge in a
1,000-foot radius. Vessels and persons
not under contract or employees of
Flatiron are prohibited from entering,
anchoring or transiting within this zone,
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg or his designated
representative. This safety zone is
effective from 7 a.m. on July 10, 2006
through 7 p.m. on September 15, 2006.
The Coast Guard does not know the
exact dates that this safety zone will be
enforced at this time, although tentative
plans are for blasts to occur on July 28,
2006 and August 25, 2006. It is
estimated that the safety zone will be
enforced for approximately two hours
on days on which a blast occurs. Coast
Guard Sector St Petersburg will give
notice of the enforcement of the safety
zone by issuing a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners beginning 24 to 48 hours
before the blasting is scheduled to
begin. On-scene notice will be provided
by local Coast Guard and Pinellas
County Sheriff marine units enforcing
the safety zone.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). The Coast Guard expects the
economic impact of this proposal to be
so minimal that a full Regulatory
Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary
because the safety zone will be in effect
for a limited period of time and vessels
may enter with the express permission
E:\FR\FM\19JYR1.SGM
19JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 138 (Wednesday, July 19, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40916-40918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11378]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD13-06-015]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Duwamish Waterway, Seattle, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is temporarily revising the operating
regulations for the First Avenue South dual drawbridges across the
Duwamish Waterway, mile 2.5, at Seattle, Washington. The change will
enable the bridge owner to keep the bridges closed during night hours
for a period longer than 60 days. This will facilitate painting the
structure while properly containing debris and paint.
DATES: This temporary rule is effective from July 15 to September 30,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket CG13-06-015 and are available for
inspection or copying at the office of Commander (dpw), 13th Coast
Guard District, 915 Second Avenue, Seattle, WA 98174-1067 between 7:30
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Austin Pratt, Chief Bridge Section,
Commander (dpw), 13th Coast Guard District, 915 Second Avenue, Seattle,
WA 98174-1067, (206) 220-7282.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On May 24, 2006, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Duwamish River,
Seattle, Washington'' in the Federal Register (71 FR 29871). We
received no letters commenting on the proposed rule. No public meeting
was requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication of this temporary final rule in the Federal Register, as is
normally required by the Administrative Procedure Act. The Coast Guard
experienced administrative problems that made compliance with the 30-
day rule impracticable within the work schedule that the bridge owner
had previously set. Compliance with the 30-day rule would require
rescheduling the repair work, perhaps for a significant amount of time.
Timely maintenance of the heavily-used First Avenue South bridges helps
preserve the safety of these spans. Thus, a delay of scheduled
maintenance would be contrary to the public interest. Moreover,
compliance with the 30-day rule at the expense of delaying scheduled
maintenance is unnecessary. Temporary deviations from drawbridge
schedules for repair or maintenance are already authorized, for periods
not to exceed 60 days, by 33 CFR 117.35(d). In this case, the bridge
repairs will not pass the 60-day mark until mid-September, by which
time this temporary final rule will have been published for far more
than 30 days. In addition, our May 24, 2006 NPRM alerted the public to
our intention to modify the drawbridge schedule, and the NPRM received
no adverse comment. Vessels large enough to require opening of these
spans use the Duwamish Waterway only infrequently. Steps have been
taken to notify affected vessels that the drawbridge schedule is being
altered, via publication in a local notice to mariners.
Background and Purpose
The dual First Avenue South drawbridges provide 32 feet of vertical
clearance at mean high water for the central 100 feet of horizontal
distance in the channel spans. When the drawspans are open there is
unlimited vertical clearance for the central 120 feet of the spans. An
adjacent, parallel bascule bridge was constructed and completed in
1999. Drawbridge openings are provided for recreational vessels, large
barges, and floating construction equipment. The operating regulations
currently in effect for these drawbridges at 33 Code of Federal
Regulations 117.1041 provide that the spans need not open for the
passage of vessels from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except for Federal holidays. The draws shall
open at any time for a vessel of 5,000 gross tons and over and for a
vessel towing such a vessel or en route to take in tow a vessel of that
size.
The temporary rule will enable the owner to paint the structure
after preparing the surfaces of the steel truss beneath the roadway.
All of this work must be accomplished within a containment system that
permits no material to fall into the waterway. This containment system
will have to be modified for drawspan openings.
The temporary closed period is from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. Sunday through
Friday from July 15 to September 30, 2006. This operating scheme was
authorized last year for the same purpose and generated no objections
or complaints from waterway users.
Our previous analysis indicated that most vessel operators will not
be inconvenienced by the hours of temporary closure. This conclusion
seems to have been borne out as no complaints were received during the
previous season of work. Others would receive enough notice to plan
trips at other hours. Vessel traffic includes tugboats, barges, derrick
barges, sailboats and motorized recreational boats including large
yachts. The majority of vessels pass through the dual bascule spans
during hours other than those affected night hours.
First Avenue South is a heavily traveled commuter arterial that
serves Boeing Company plants and other industrial facilities in south
Seattle. The dual bascule spans need not open for the passage of
vessels from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. Monday through
Friday. Vessels of 5000 gross tons or more are exempted from these
closed periods. However, vessels of this size infrequently ply this
reach of the waterway. The dual spans open an average of four times a
day.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
No comments or letters were received in response to the NPRM. No
changes to the proposed regulation were made.
[[Page 40917]]
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary. Most vessels will be able to plan transits to
avoid the closed periods. Most commercial vessel owners have indicated
that they can tolerate the proposed hours by working around them.
Saturdays will enjoy normal operations, lessening inconvenience to
sailboats.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This may affect some recreational sailboat owners
insofar as they must return by 9 p.m. or wait until 5 a.m. to regain
moorage above the drawbridges. We expect these to be few in number.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact Austin Pratt,
Chief, Bridge Section, at (206) 220-7282.
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of Information and Regulatory Affairs has
not designated this as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does
not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. There are no expected environmental
consequences of the proposed action that would require further analysis
and documentation.
[[Page 40918]]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.
0
2. From 9 p.m. July 15 to 5 a.m. September 30, 2006, in Sec. 117.1041,
suspend paragraph (a)(1) and add a new paragraph (a)(3) to read as
follows:
Sec. 117.1041 Duwamish Waterway.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(3) From Monday through Friday, except all Federal holidays but
Columbus Day, the draws of the First Avenue South Bridges, mile 2.5,
need not be opened for the passage of vessels from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. and
from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m., except during these hours: The draws shall open
at any time for a vessel of 5000 gross tons and over, a vessel towing a
5000 gross tons and over, and a vessel proceeding to pick up for towing
a vessel of 5000 gross tons and over. From July 15 to September 30,
2006, Sunday through Friday, the draws need not be opened for the
passage of any vessels from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m.
* * * * *
Dated: July 10, 2006.
R.R. Houck,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, District Commander, Thirteenth Coast
Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6-11378 Filed 7-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P