Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Redesignation of the City of Weirton PM-10 Nonattainment Area to Attainment and Approval of the Maintenance Plan, 40023-40025 [E6-11107]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 135 / Friday, July 14, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
40023
RHODE ISLAND NON REGULATORY—Continued
Name of non regulatory
SIP provision
Applicable geographic or
nonattainment area
State submittal date/effective date
EPA approved date
September 20, 2001 letter
from Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management.
Statewide ............................
Submitted 09/20/01 ..........
06/20/03, 68 FR 36921 ......
NOX State Implementation
Plan (SIP) Call Narrative, revised September 2001.
Statewide ............................
Submitted 09/20/01 ..........
06/20/03, 68 FR 36921.
[FR Doc. E6–11108 Filed 7–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R03–OAR–2005–0480; FRL–8197–1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; Redesignation of the City of
Weirton PM–10 Nonattainment Area to
Attainment and Approval of the
Maintenance Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a
redesignation request and a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of West Virginia.
This revision requests that EPA
redesignate the Weirton nonattainment
area (Weirton Area) to attainment for the
national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS) for particulate matter with an
aerodynamic diameter less than or equal
to a nominal 10 micrometers (PM–10),
and concurrently requests approval of a
limited maintenance plan (LMP) as a
revision to the West Virginia State
Implementation (SIP). In this action,
EPA is approving the State’s request to
redesignate the area from nonattainment
to attainment, as well as approving the
LMP for the Weirton Area.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on August 14, 2006.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2005–0480. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
Explanations
Submitting the ‘‘NOX
State Implementation
Plan (SIP) Call Narrative,’’ revised September 2001.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the West Virginia
Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601
57th Street, SE., Charleston, WV 25304.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Miller, (215) 814–2068, or by email at miller.linda@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
EPA’s proposed action are explained in
the NPR and will not be restated here.
EPA received one comment in support
of the proposed approval.
I. Background
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
On May 11, 2006 (71 FR 27440), EPA
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of West
Virginia. The NPR proposed approval of
the LMP for the Weirton Area in West
Virginia and the State’s request to
redesignate the area from nonattainment
to attainment. EPA also proposed to
determine that, because the Weirton
Area has continued to attain the PM–10
NAAQS, certain attainment
demonstration requirements, along with
other related requirements of the CAA,
are not applicable to the Weirton Area.
West Virginia submitted a request to
redesignate the Weirton Area to
attainment for PM–10 and a SIP
submittal for the related maintenance
plan on May 24, 2004.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On May 16, 2001 (66 FR 27034), EPA
promulgated a final rule entitled,
‘‘Determination of Attainment of the
NAAQS for PM–10 in the Weirton, West
Virginia Nonattainment Area’’ finding
that the Weirton PM–10 nonattainment
had attained the NAAQS for PM–10 by
its applicable December 31, 2000
attainment date. In order to be
redesignated from nonattainment to
attainment, West Virginia requested, in
a letter dated October 14, 2003, that EPA
apply its clean data policy to the
Weirton Area. The redesignation
request, dated May 24, 2004, included
the associated SIP submittal of the
maintenance plan for the Weirton area.
Other specific requirements of the
request for redesignation and the
associated rationale and the rationale for
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the PM–10
redesignation request for the Weirton
Area, and also approving the associated
limited maintenance plan as a revision
to the West Virginia SIP.
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
40024
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 135 / Friday, July 14, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal requirement, and does not alter
the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established
in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action to approve the redesignation
request for the Weirton nonattainment
area and approve the associated
maintenance plan as a revision to the
SIP must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 12, 2006. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
State submittal
date
Name of non-regulatory SIP
revision
Applicable geographic area
*
*
City of Weirton PM–10 Maintenance Plan.
*
Hancock and Brooke Counties
(part)—the City of Weirton.
*
4/24/04
1. The authority citation for Part 81
continues to read as follows:
I
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and Recordkeeping
requirements, Particulate matter.
40 CFR Part 81
Air Pollution Control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: July 6, 2006.
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 are amended
as follows:
I
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR
part 52 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart XX—West Virginia
2. In § 52.2520, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding an entry for
the City of Weirton PM–10 Maintenance
Plan at the end of the table to read as
follows:
I
§ 52.2520
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
Additional explanation
*
*
*
7/14/06 [Insert page number
Limited maintenance plan.
where the document begins].
§ 81.349
*
I 2. In § 81.349, the table for ‘‘West
Virginia—PM–10’’ is amended by
revising the entry for Hancock and
Brooke Counties (part): The City of
Weirton to read as follows:
Subpart C—Section 107 Attainment
Status Designations
List of Subjects
EPA
approval
date
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PART 81—[AMENDED]
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
*
West Virginia.
*
*
*
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
WEST VIRGINIA—PM–10
Designation
Classification
Designated Area
Date
*
*
*
*
Hancock and Brooke Counties (part): The City of Weirton ...............................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
9/12/06
Type
Date
*
Attainment.
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
Type
*
40025
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 135 / Friday, July 14, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
WEST VIRGINIA—PM–10—Continued
Designation
Classification
Designated Area
Date
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–11107 Filed 7–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 206
[Docket ID FEMA–2006–0028]
RIN 1660–AA45
Public Assistance Eligibility
Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA),
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This interim rule will allow
FEMA to reimburse State, Tribal and
local governments within an area
designated under a Presidential
emergency or major disaster declaration
for sheltering and evacuation costs
incurred outside of the designated area.
Under this rule, FEMA may also directly
provide sheltering and evacuation
assistance outside of the designated
area.
Effective: This rule is effective
July 14, 2006. Comments: Comments
due on or before September 12, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket ID FEMA–2006–
0028, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: FEMA–RULES@dhs.gov.
Include Docket ID FEMA–2006–0028 in
the subject line of the message.
Fax: 202–646–4536
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Rules
Docket Clerk, Office of General Counsel,
Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Room 835, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472.
Instructions: All Submissions
received must include the agency name
and Docket ID (if available) for this
interim final rule. All comments
received will be posted without change
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
*
Type
*
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Submitted
comments may also be inspected at
FEMA, Office of General Counsel, 500 C
Street, SW., Room 835, Washington, DC
20472.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James A. Walke, FEMA, 500 C Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20472, or call
(202) 646–2751, or e-mail
james.walke@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or
arguments on all aspects of the interim
rule. FEMA also invites comments that
relate to the economic, environmental,
or federalism affects that might result
from this interim rule. Comments that
will provide the most assistance to
FEMA in developing these procedures
will reference a specific portion of the
interim rule, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include data,
information, or authority that support
such recommended change.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket ID for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submitted
comments may also be inspected at
Office of General Counsel, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street, SW., Room 835, Washington, DC
20472.
Background
In response to Hurricanes Katrina and
Rita in 2005, pre- and post-storm
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Date
*
Type
*
evacuations created a significant need
for evacuation and sheltering outside of
the counties and States that were
initially designated eligible for
assistance under the emergency and
major disaster declarations. State and
local governmental entities outside of
the designated areas provided
transportation and shelter for evacuees
and, as a result, incurred significant
costs. However, FEMA’s existing
regulation required that the eligible
work be performed within the
designated disaster (or emergency) area.
44 CFR 206.223(a)(2). Therefore, in
order for the non-designated State and
local governments to recoup their
eligible costs, the States were required
to request and obtain approval for a
separate emergency declaration.
Otherwise, there was no mechanism
whereby FEMA could provide
assistance to those entities that provided
evacuation and sheltering services
outside the designated areas.
Discussion of Interim Rule
This interim rule implements a
change to 44 CFR 206.223(a)(2). This
rule will allow FEMA to reimburse for
sheltering and evacuation costs incurred
outside of the area designated under a
Presidential emergency or major disaster
declaration, if the costs are otherwise
eligible for Public Assistance funding.
Under this rule, an eligible applicant (as
defined in 44 CFR 206.222) within the
designated disaster area may request an
entity outside of the designated area to
provide evacuation and sheltering
services for its citizens. In such
circumstances, the entity that provides
the evacuation or sheltering services
may seek reimbursement under a
mutual aid or similar agreement 1 from
the eligible applicant within the
designated area that requested the
services. The eligible applicant will
reimburse the providing entity and
FEMA will then reimburse the eligible
applicant. Alternatively, FEMA may
request an entity outside of the
designated area to provide evacuation
and sheltering services for the affected
1 Mutual aid agreements where one State or local
government reimburses another State or local
government for services provided take many forms,
including the Emergency Management Assistance
Compact, Public Law 104–321.
E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM
14JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 135 (Friday, July 14, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40023-40025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11107]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA-R03-OAR-2005-0480; FRL-8197-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
West Virginia; Redesignation of the City of Weirton PM-10 Nonattainment
Area to Attainment and Approval of the Maintenance Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a redesignation request and a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of West
Virginia. This revision requests that EPA redesignate the Weirton
nonattainment area (Weirton Area) to attainment for the national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter with an
aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers
(PM-10), and concurrently requests approval of a limited maintenance
plan (LMP) as a revision to the West Virginia State Implementation
(SIP). In this action, EPA is approving the State's request to
redesignate the area from nonattainment to attainment, as well as
approving the LMP for the Weirton Area.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on August 14, 2006.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2005-0480. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Publicly available docket materials
are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in
hard copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601 57th Street,
SE., Charleston, WV 25304.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Miller, (215) 814-2068, or by e-
mail at miller.linda@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On May 11, 2006 (71 FR 27440), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of West Virginia. The NPR proposed
approval of the LMP for the Weirton Area in West Virginia and the
State's request to redesignate the area from nonattainment to
attainment. EPA also proposed to determine that, because the Weirton
Area has continued to attain the PM-10 NAAQS, certain attainment
demonstration requirements, along with other related requirements of
the CAA, are not applicable to the Weirton Area. West Virginia
submitted a request to redesignate the Weirton Area to attainment for
PM-10 and a SIP submittal for the related maintenance plan on May 24,
2004.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On May 16, 2001 (66 FR 27034), EPA promulgated a final rule
entitled, ``Determination of Attainment of the NAAQS for PM-10 in the
Weirton, West Virginia Nonattainment Area'' finding that the Weirton
PM-10 nonattainment had attained the NAAQS for PM-10 by its applicable
December 31, 2000 attainment date. In order to be redesignated from
nonattainment to attainment, West Virginia requested, in a letter dated
October 14, 2003, that EPA apply its clean data policy to the Weirton
Area. The redesignation request, dated May 24, 2004, included the
associated SIP submittal of the maintenance plan for the Weirton area.
Other specific requirements of the request for redesignation and
the associated rationale and the rationale for EPA's proposed action
are explained in the NPR and will not be restated here. EPA received
one comment in support of the proposed approval.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the PM-10 redesignation request for the Weirton
Area, and also approving the associated limited maintenance plan as a
revision to the West Virginia SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
[[Page 40024]]
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal requirement, and does not alter the relationship
or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action to approve the redesignation request for
the Weirton nonattainment area and approve the associated maintenance
plan as a revision to the SIP must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 12, 2006. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and Recordkeeping requirements, Particulate
matter.
40 CFR Part 81
Air Pollution Control, National parks, Wilderness areas.
Dated: July 6, 2006.
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 are amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR part 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart XX--West Virginia
0
2. In Sec. 52.2520, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
entry for the City of Weirton PM-10 Maintenance Plan at the end of the
table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2520 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of non-regulatory SIP Applicable submittal EPA approval date Additional
revision geographic area date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
City of Weirton PM-10 Maintenance Hancock and Brooke 4/24/04 7/14/06 [Insert page Limited maintenance
Plan. Counties (part)-- number where the plan.
the City of Weirton. document begins].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART 81--[AMENDED]
Subpart C--Section 107 Attainment Status Designations
0
1. The authority citation for Part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 81.349, the table for ``West Virginia--PM-10'' is amended
by revising the entry for Hancock and Brooke Counties (part): The City
of Weirton to read as follows:
Sec. 81.349 West Virginia.
* * * * *
West Virginia--PM-10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation Classification
Designated Area --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Type Date Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Hancock and Brooke Counties (part): 9/12/06 Attainment...............
The City of Weirton.
[[Page 40025]]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-11107 Filed 7-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P