Special Local Regulation; Annual Greater Jacksonville Kingfish Tournament; Jacksonville, FL, 40012-40014 [E6-10585]

Download as PDF 40012 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 135 / Friday, July 14, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 3. In appendix C to part 4022, Rate Set 154, as set forth below, is added to the table. I Appendix C to Part 4022—Lump Sum Interest Rates for Private-Sector Payments * * For plans with a valuation date * * On or after Rate set * 154 .................................... Before * 9–1–06 Deferred annuities (percent) Immediate annuity rate (percent) * * 3.50 8–1–06 i1 i2 i3 4.00 * 4.00 4.00 * n1 * n2 * 7 8 Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1301(a), 1302(b)(3), 1341, 1344, 1362. PART 4044—ALLOCATION OF ASSETS IN SINGLE-EMPLOYER PLANS Appendix B to Part 4044—Interest Rates Used to Value Benefits 5. In appendix B to part 4044, a new entry for August 2006, as set forth below, is added to the table. * I 4. The authority citation for part 4044 continues to read as follows: I * * * * The values of it are: For valuation dates occurring in the month— it * * * August 2006 ...................................................................... Issued in Washington, DC, on this 7th day of July 2006. Vincent K. Snowbarger, Acting Executive Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. [FR Doc. E6–11101 Filed 7–13–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7709–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 100 [CGD07–06–108] RIN 1625–AA08 Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule. AGENCY: cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES SUMMARY: This rule temporarily suspends the current special local regulations, established for the Annual Greater Jacksonville Kingfish Tournament, Jacksonville, Florida, and adds a temporary final rule for the event due to changes in the tournament this year. This special local regulation is necessary to reflect the changes made to the tournament by the sponsor and to ensure the safety of participating vessels and spectators within the regulated area. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:14 Jul 13, 2006 Jkt 208001 it for t = 1–20 * .0475 >20 * .0640 This rule is effective from July 17, 2006 to July 22, 2006. ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket are part of docket [CGD 07–06– 108] and are available for inspection and copying at Coast Guard Sector Jacksonville Prevention Department, 7820 Arlington Expressway, Suite 400, Jacksonville, Florida, 32211, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ensign Kira Peterson at Coast Guard Sector Jacksonville Prevention Department, Florida, tel: (904) 232– 2640, ext. 108. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DATES: Regulatory Information Special Local Regulation; Annual Greater Jacksonville Kingfish Tournament; Jacksonville, FL ACTION: for t = We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a NPRM. The changes to this event were not relayed to the Coast Guard with enough time to allow for public comment. Publishing a NPRM with a comment period would delay the rule’s effective date and is contrary to public interest because immediate action is necessary to protect the public and waters of the United States. For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 it * for t = * N/A N/A Coast Guard will issue a broadcast notice to mariners and Coast Guard or local law enforcement vessels will be in the vicinity of this zone to advise mariners of the restriction. Background and Purpose The Greater Jacksonville Kingfish Tournament is held annually the second full week of July along the waters of the St. Johns River and the Atlantic Ocean. This regulation will temporarily change the eastern boundary of the regulated area found in paragraph (a) of Section 100.710 from Lighted Buoy 7 (LLNR 7145) in approximate position 30– 23.56N, 081–23.04W, and Lighted Buoy 8 (LLNR 7150) in position 30–24.03N, 081–23.01W, to Lighted Buoy 10 (LLNR 2190) at approximate position 30– 24.376N, 081–24.998W. Changes are also being made to the effective dates found in paragraph (c) of Section 100.710 as the tournament will now take place the second full week after July 4th. Additionally, a new paragraph (b) is being added to define ‘‘Minimum Safe Speed’’ and existing paragraphs (b) and (c) are being redesignated (c) and (d) accordingly. Coast Guard Sector Jacksonville will issue a Local Notice to Mariners announcing times and dates the regulated area is in effect. Vessels transiting within the regulated area must travel at a Minimum Safe Speed. Discussion of Rule This temporary rule is necessary to accommodate the changes by the E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM 14JYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 135 / Friday, July 14, 2006 / Rules and Regulations sponsor to the Annual Greater Jacksonville Kingfish Tournament. The regulated area found in 33 CFR 100.710 paragraph (a) will be revised to reflect the new eastern boundary set at Lighted Buoy 10 (LLNR 2190) at approximate position 30–24.376N, 081–24.998W. The tournament date found in paragraph (c) will reflect the new tournament date set for the second full week after July 4th (July 17 through July 22, 2006). Additionally, a new paragraph (b) will be added to define ‘‘Minimum Safe Speed’’. ‘‘Minimum Safe Speed’’ is the new speed restriction which will replace the current ‘‘No Wake Speed’’. Vessels transiting within the regulated area must travel at a Minimum Safe Speed. The regulated area is needed to control vessel traffic during the event to enhance the safety of participants and transiting vessels. cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES Regulatory Evaluation This rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because the regulation only requires that vessels operate at a minimum safe speed within the zone, and does not prohibit any vessel or person from entering the zone. If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:14 Jul 13, 2006 Jkt 208001 significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it. Assistance for Small Entities Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact ENS Kira Peterson Sector Jacksonville Prevention Department, at (904) 232–2640, Ext. 108. Collection of Information This rule would call for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.). Federalism A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for federalism. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. Taking of Private Property This rule would not effect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. Civil Justice Reform This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 40013 Protection of Children We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might disproportionately affect children. Indian Tribal Governments This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Energy Effects We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under that order because it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211. Technical Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM 14JYR1 40014 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 135 / Friday, July 14, 2006 / Rules and Regulations which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h) of the Instruction from further environmental documentation. Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’ is not required for this rule. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Waterways. I For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows: PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS which vessels of different sizes and configurations may travel while in compliance with this definition, no specific speed is assigned to minimum safe speed. In no instance should minimum safe speed be interpreted as a speed less than that required for a particular vessel to maintain steerageway. A vessel is not proceeding at minimum safe speed if it is: (1) On a plane; (2) In the process of coming up onto or coming off a plane; or (3) Creating an excessive wake. (c) Regulations. Vessels operating in the regulated area must operate at Minimum Safe Speed. (d) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 5 a.m. to 10 p.m. on July 17 to July 22, 2006. Dated: June 12, 2006. D.W. Kunkel, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. E6–10585 Filed 7–13–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P 1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. § 100.710 [Suspended] cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES (a) Regulated Area. A regulated area is established for the waters of the St. Johns River lying between an eastern boundary of the St. Johns River Lighted Buoy 10 (LLNR 2190) in approximate position 30–24.376N, 081–24.998W, and the western boundary formed by Lighted Buoy 25 (LLNR 7305) in approximate position 30–23.40N, 081– 28.26W, and Short Cut Light 26 (LLNR 7130) in approximate position 30– 23.46N, 081–28.16W with the northern and southern boundaries formed by the banks of the St. Johns and extended north from the boundary formed by the St. Johns River and the Intracoastal Waterway, Sisters Creek, to Lighted Buoy 83 (LLNR 38330) on the Intracoastal Waterway. (b) Definition. The following definition applies to this section: Minimum Safe Speed means the speed at which a vessel proceeds when it is fully off plane, completely settled in the water and not creating excessive wake. Due to the different speeds at Jkt 208001 Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Rhode Island Update to Materials Incorporated by Reference Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule; Notice of administrative change. AGENCY: § 100.T07–108 Annual Greater Jacksonville Kingfish Tournament; Jacksonville, Florida. 15:14 Jul 13, 2006 40 CFR Part 52 [RI–44–1222c; FRL–8185–1] 2. From July 17 to 22, 2006, suspend § 100.710. I 3. From July 17 to 22, 2006, add a new temporary § 100.T07–108 to read as follows: I VerDate Aug<31>2005 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY SUMMARY: EPA is publishing this action to provide the public with notice of the update to the Rhode Island State Implementation Plan (SIP) compilation. In particular, materials submitted by Rhode Island that are incorporated by reference (IBR) into the Rhode Island SIP are being updated to reflect EPAapproved revisions to Rhode Island’s SIP that have occurred since the last update. In this action, EPA is also notifying the public of the correction of typographical errors within the table in the regulations, and modification of the Federal Register citations to reflect the first page of the applicable Federal Register document. DATES: This action is effective July 14, 2006. ADDRESSES: SIP materials which are incorporated by reference into 40 CFR part 52 are available for inspection at the following locations: Environmental Protection Agency, New England PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Regional Office (Region 1), One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02114–2023; the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Room B–108, Washington, DC 20460; or the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal_register/ code_of_federal_regulations/ ibr_locations.html. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Donald Cooke, Environmental Scientist, at the above EPA New England Region address or at (617) 918–1668 or by email at cooke.donald@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The State Implementation Plan (SIP) is a living document which the State can revise as necessary to address its unique air pollution problems. Therefore, EPA from time to time must take action on SIP revisions containing new and/or revised regulations as being part of the SIP. On May 22, 1997, (62 FR 27968), EPA revised the procedures for incorporation by reference (IBR) federally-approved SIPs, as a result of consultations between EPA and the Office of Federal Register (OFR). The description of the revised SIP document, IBR procedures and ‘‘Identification of plan’’ format are discussed in further detail in the May 22, 1997 Federal Register document. On August 9, 1999 (64 FR 43083), EPA published a Federal Register beginning the new IBR procedure for Rhode Island. In this document, EPA is doing the following: 1. Announcing the update to the Rhode Island IBR material as of June 2, 2006. 2. Making a correction in the table to § 52.2070(c), nineteenth entry ‘‘Air Pollution Control Regulation 19.’’— Explanations column, corrected reference to Air Pollution Control Regulation 35, Control of VOCs and Volatile Hazardous Air ants from Wood Products Manufacturing Operations. 3. Making a correction in the table to § 52.2070(c), twentieth entry ‘‘Air Pollution Control Regulation 21.’’— Explanations column, replace the word ‘‘on’’ with the word ‘‘of’’ in the third sentence. 4. Making a correction in the table to § 52.2070(d), second entry ‘‘Stanley Bostitch Division, Bostitch Division of Textron.’’—Explanations column, reinsert the two deleted words, ‘‘must meet,’’ at the end of the last sentence. 5. Making a correction in the table to § 52.2070(d), third entry ‘‘Keene E:\FR\FM\14JYR1.SGM 14JYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 135 (Friday, July 14, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40012-40014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10585]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD07-06-108]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulation; Annual Greater Jacksonville Kingfish 
Tournament; Jacksonville, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule temporarily suspends the current special local 
regulations, established for the Annual Greater Jacksonville Kingfish 
Tournament, Jacksonville, Florida, and adds a temporary final rule for 
the event due to changes in the tournament this year. This special 
local regulation is necessary to reflect the changes made to the 
tournament by the sponsor and to ensure the safety of participating 
vessels and spectators within the regulated area.

DATES: This rule is effective from July 17, 2006 to July 22, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in 
the docket are part of docket [CGD 07-06-108] and are available for 
inspection and copying at Coast Guard Sector Jacksonville Prevention 
Department, 7820 Arlington Expressway, Suite 400, Jacksonville, 
Florida, 32211, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ensign Kira Peterson at Coast Guard 
Sector Jacksonville Prevention Department, Florida, tel: (904) 232-
2640, ext. 108.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this 
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a NPRM. The changes to this event were 
not relayed to the Coast Guard with enough time to allow for public 
comment. Publishing a NPRM with a comment period would delay the rule's 
effective date and is contrary to public interest because immediate 
action is necessary to protect the public and waters of the United 
States.
    For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard 
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 
30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The Coast Guard will 
issue a broadcast notice to mariners and Coast Guard or local law 
enforcement vessels will be in the vicinity of this zone to advise 
mariners of the restriction.

Background and Purpose

    The Greater Jacksonville Kingfish Tournament is held annually the 
second full week of July along the waters of the St. Johns River and 
the Atlantic Ocean. This regulation will temporarily change the eastern 
boundary of the regulated area found in paragraph (a) of Section 
100.710 from Lighted Buoy 7 (LLNR 7145) in approximate position 30-
23.56N, 081-23.04W, and Lighted Buoy 8 (LLNR 7150) in position 30-
24.03N, 081-23.01W, to Lighted Buoy 10 (LLNR 2190) at approximate 
position 30-24.376N, 081-24.998W. Changes are also being made to the 
effective dates found in paragraph (c) of Section 100.710 as the 
tournament will now take place the second full week after July 4th. 
Additionally, a new paragraph (b) is being added to define ``Minimum 
Safe Speed'' and existing paragraphs (b) and (c) are being redesignated 
(c) and (d) accordingly. Coast Guard Sector Jacksonville will issue a 
Local Notice to Mariners announcing times and dates the regulated area 
is in effect. Vessels transiting within the regulated area must travel 
at a Minimum Safe Speed.

Discussion of Rule

    This temporary rule is necessary to accommodate the changes by the

[[Page 40013]]

sponsor to the Annual Greater Jacksonville Kingfish Tournament. The 
regulated area found in 33 CFR 100.710 paragraph (a) will be revised to 
reflect the new eastern boundary set at Lighted Buoy 10 (LLNR 2190) at 
approximate position 30-24.376N, 081-24.998W. The tournament date found 
in paragraph (c) will reflect the new tournament date set for the 
second full week after July 4th (July 17 through July 22, 2006). 
Additionally, a new paragraph (b) will be added to define ``Minimum 
Safe Speed''. ``Minimum Safe Speed'' is the new speed restriction which 
will replace the current ``No Wake Speed''.
    Vessels transiting within the regulated area must travel at a 
Minimum Safe Speed. The regulated area is needed to control vessel 
traffic during the event to enhance the safety of participants and 
transiting vessels.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does 
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the 
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS).
    We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a 
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures 
of DHS is unnecessary.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities because the regulation only requires that vessels 
operate at a minimum safe speed within the zone, and does not prohibit 
any vessel or person from entering the zone.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule 
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or 
options for compliance, please contact ENS Kira Peterson Sector 
Jacksonville Prevention Department, at (904) 232-2640, Ext. 108.

Collection of Information

    This rule would call for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule would not result in such an expenditure, we 
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule would not effect a taking of private property or 
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, 
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected 
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,

[[Page 40014]]

which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit 
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the 
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under 
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h) of the Instruction from further 
environmental documentation.
    Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an 
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' is not required for this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Waterways.


0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1.


Sec.  100.710  [Suspended]

0
2. From July 17 to 22, 2006, suspend Sec.  100.710.

0
3. From July 17 to 22, 2006, add a new temporary Sec.  100.T07-108 to 
read as follows:


Sec.  100.T07-108  Annual Greater Jacksonville Kingfish Tournament; 
Jacksonville, Florida.

    (a) Regulated Area. A regulated area is established for the waters 
of the St. Johns River lying between an eastern boundary of the St. 
Johns River Lighted Buoy 10 (LLNR 2190) in approximate position 30-
24.376N, 081-24.998W, and the western boundary formed by Lighted Buoy 
25 (LLNR 7305) in approximate position 30-23.40N, 081-28.26W, and Short 
Cut Light 26 (LLNR 7130) in approximate position 30-23.46N, 081-28.16W 
with the northern and southern boundaries formed by the banks of the 
St. Johns and extended north from the boundary formed by the St. Johns 
River and the Intracoastal Waterway, Sisters Creek, to Lighted Buoy 83 
(LLNR 38330) on the Intracoastal Waterway.
    (b) Definition. The following definition applies to this section:
    Minimum Safe Speed means the speed at which a vessel proceeds when 
it is fully off plane, completely settled in the water and not creating 
excessive wake. Due to the different speeds at which vessels of 
different sizes and configurations may travel while in compliance with 
this definition, no specific speed is assigned to minimum safe speed. 
In no instance should minimum safe speed be interpreted as a speed less 
than that required for a particular vessel to maintain steerageway. A 
vessel is not proceeding at minimum safe speed if it is:
    (1) On a plane;
    (2) In the process of coming up onto or coming off a plane; or
    (3) Creating an excessive wake.
    (c) Regulations. Vessels operating in the regulated area must 
operate at Minimum Safe Speed.
    (d) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 5 a.m. 
to 10 p.m. on July 17 to July 22, 2006.

    Dated: June 12, 2006.
D.W. Kunkel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard 
District.
 [FR Doc. E6-10585 Filed 7-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.