Pipeline Safety: Petition for Waiver; Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company, 39698-39699 [E6-11011]
Download as PDF
39698
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 134 / Thursday, July 13, 2006 / Notices
information on respondents, including
using automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Issued on: July 3, 2006.
John H. Hill,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–11005 Filed 7–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety;
Notice of Delays in Processing of
Special Permit Applications
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: List of applications delayed
more than 180 days.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c),
PHMSA is publishing the following list
of special permit applications that have
been in process for 180 days or more.
The reasons(s) for delay and the
expected completion date for action on
each application is provided in
association with each identified
application.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann
Mazzullo, Office of Hazardous Materials
Special Permits and Approvals, Pipeline
and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20590–0001, (202)
366–4535.
Key to ‘‘Reason for Delay’’
1. Awaiting additional information
from applicant.
2. Extensive public comment under
review.
3. Application is technically complex
and is of significant impact or
precedent-setting and requires extensive
analysis.
4. Staff review delayed by other
priority issues or volume of special
permit applications.
Meaning of Application Number
Suffixes
N—New application.
M—Modification request.
X—Renewal.
PM—Party to applicant with
modification request.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 10,
2006.
R. Ryan Posten,
Chief, Special Permits Program, Office of
Hazardous Materials Safety, Special Permits
& Approvals.
NEW SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATIONS
Application No.
13563–N
14184–N
14229–N
14239–N
14257–N
14266–N
14277–N
14285–N
14289–N
14301–N
14298–N
14283–N
14237–N
14232–N
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
Reason for
delay
Applicant
Applied Companies, Valencia, CA ......................................................................................
Global Refrigerants, Inc., Denver, CO ................................................................................
Senex Explosives, Inc., Cuddy, PA ....................................................................................
Marlin Gas Transport, Inc., Odessa, FL .............................................................................
Origin Energy American Samoa, Inc., Pago Pago, AS ......................................................
NCF Industries, Inc., Santa Maria, CA ...............................................................................
Ascus Technologies, Ltd., Cleveland, OH ..........................................................................
INO Therapeutics LLC, Port Allen, LA ...............................................................................
City Machine & Welding, Inc., Amarillo, TX .......................................................................
Triple S Gas Tanks (PTY) Ltd dba, Gascon, Elsieriver, South Africa ...............................
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, PA ..............................................................
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Washington, DC ........................................................
Advanced Technology Materials, Inc., (ATMI), Danbury, CT .............................................
Luxfer Gas Cylinders—Composite, Cyclinder Division, Riverside, CA ..............................
1
4
4
1
4
3
3, 4
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
Estimated date
of completion
07–31–2006
07–31–2006
07–31–2006
07–31–2006
07–31–2006
08–31–2006
08–31–2006
08–31–2006
08–31–2006
08–31–2006
08–31–2006
07–31–2006
08–31–2006
07–31–2006
MODIFICATION TO SPECIAL PERMIT
Application No.
11903–M
13583–M
11691–M
12677–M
................
................
................
................
Reason for
delay
Applicant
Comptank Corporation, Bothwell, ON ................................................................................
Structural Composites Industries, Pomona, CA .................................................................
Sensient Flavors, Inc., Indianapolis, IN ..............................................................................
Austin Powder Illinois Company, Cleveland, OH ...............................................................
[FR Doc. 06–6196 Filed 7–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
[Docket No. PHMSA–04–19091; Grant 2]
Pipeline Safety: Petition for Waiver;
Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Grant; petition for waiver.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:35 Jul 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4
3, 4
4
1
Estimated date
of completion
07–31–2006
07–31–2006
07–31–2006
08–31–2006
SUMMARY: Tuscarora Gas Transmission
Company (Tuscarora) requests a waiver
of the pipeline safety regulation on
valve spacing from PHMSA. The
pipeline safety regulation requires each
point on a pipeline in a Class 1 location
be within 10 miles of a block valve. This
document grants Tuscarora’s request for
waiver.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The pipeline safety regulation at 49
CFR 192.179(a)(4) requires each point
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 134 / Thursday, July 13, 2006 / Notices
on a pipeline in a Class 1 location be
within 10 miles of a block valve, the
maximum not to exceed 20 miles.
PHMSA, however, reserves the right to
approve an alternative spacing, which
will provide an equivalent level of
safety.
During a review of its records,
Tuscarora discovered that the upstream
portions of its pipeline in Lassen
County, CA, were slightly re-routed
during construction to avoid a sensitive
environmental habitat. As a result, the
valve spacing between main line valve
(MLV) 8 and MLV–9 exceeds the
PHMSA mandated maximum valve
space of 20 miles by 1,065 feet. Due to
this excessive valve space, Tuscarora
requests a waiver of the valve spacing
requirement for this section of line.
As part of its review, PHMSA has
taken the following information into
consideration in regards to Tuscarora’s
waiver request:
• The pipeline was re-routed during
construction to avoid a sensitive
environmental habitat;
• All mainline block valves on the
Tuscarora system are equipped with
automatic line break detection and
automatic closure devices;
• An existing dirt roadway provides
ease of access to the affected valve
location; and
• The pipeline segment from MLV–8
to MLV–10 is designed, operated, and
maintained to Class 1 requirements in
accordance with 49 CFR part 192.
On October 26, 2004, PHMSA
published a notice in the Federal
Register requesting public comment on
Tuscarora’s waiver request (69 FR
62516). No comments were received.
Grant of Waiver
Based on the information above,
PHMSA finds that a waiver from the
requirement of § 192.179(a)(4) is not
inconsistent with pipeline safety and
does provide an equivalent level of
safety to that required by the regulation.
Specifically, Tuscarora’s entire mainline
block valves are equipped with
automatic line break detection and
automatic closure devices. Therefore,
Tuscarora’s request for waiver from the
regulatory requirements of
§ 192.179(a)(4) is granted between
MLV–8 and MLV–9.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60118(c) and 49 CFR
1.53.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 6, 2006.
Joy Kadnar,
Director-Engineering Services, Security, and
Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. E6–11011 Filed 7–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:46 Jul 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Research and Innovative Technology
Administration
Agency Information Collection;
Activity Under OMB Review;
Confidential Close Call Reporting
System
Research & Innovative
Technology Administration (RITA),
Bureau of Transportation Statistics
(BTS), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) described
below is being forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
approval for a new information
collection in support of a five-year
research study aiming at improving rail
safety by analyzing information on close
calls and other unsafe occurrences in
the rail industry. The ICR describes the
nature of the information collection and
its expected burden. The Federal
Register notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the
following collection of information was
published on April 27, 2006 (71 FR
24913) and the comment period ended
on June 26, 2006. The 60-day notice
produced no comments.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted by August 14, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Demetra V. Collia, Room 3430, RITA,
BTS, Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001. Telephone (202) 366–1610,
Fax (202) 493–0568 or e-mail
demetera.collia@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Confidential Close Call
Reporting System.
Type of Request: Approval of a new
information collection.
OMB Control Number: New.
Affected Public: Workers in the
railroad industry.
Number of Respondents: 350.
Number of Responses: 350.
Total Annual Burden: 175 hours
(Average estimate of 30 minutes to
complete the survey resulting in a total
of 175 hours).
Abstract: Collecting data on the
nation’s transportation system is an
important component of BTS’s
responsibility to the transportation
community and is authorized in BTS
statutory authority (49 U.S.C. 111(c)(1)
and (2) and 49 U.S.C. 111(c)(5) (j)). BTS
and FRA share a common interest in
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39699
promoting rail safety based on better
data. To that end, FRA’s Office of
Research and Development is
sponsoring the Confidential Close Call
Reporting System (C3RS) Demonstration
Project to investigate the effectiveness of
such system in improving rail safety.
A close call represents a situation in
which an ongoing sequence of events
was stopped from developing further,
preventing the occurrence of potentially
serious safety-related consequences.
This might include the following: (1)
Events that happen frequently, but have
low safety consequences; (2) events that
happen infrequently but have the
potential for high consequences (e.g., a
train in dark territory proceeds beyond
its authority); (3) events that are below
the FRA reporting threshold (e.g., an
event that causes a minor injury); and
(4) events that are reportable to FRA but
have the potential for a far greater
accident than the one reported (e.g., a
slow speed collision with minor damage
to the equipment and no injuries.).
Employees involved in a close call
will be asked to fill out a reporting form
which will be made available on the
Web and at their work site and mail it
to BTS. The close call reporting form
will ask the respondent to provide
information on: (1) Name and contact
information; (2) time and location of the
incident; (3) a short description of the
event; (4) contributing factors to the
close call; and (5) any other information
that might be useful in determining a
root cause of such event.
BTS will collect close call reports
submitted by railroad employees,
develop an analytical database
containing the reported data and other
pertinent information, and protect the
confidentiality of these data through its
own statute (49 U.S.C. 111(i)) and the
Confidential Information Protection and
Statistical Efficiency Act of 2002
(CIPSEA). Accordingly, only statistical
and non-sensitive information will be
made available through publications
and reports. Through the analysis of
close calls the FRA and the railroad
community will receive information
about factors that may contribute to
unsafe events and use that information
to develop new training programs and
identify root causes of potentially
adverse events. The database will also
provide other users such as rail safety
researchers with valuable data regarding
precursors to safety risks and contribute
to research and development of
intervention programs aimed at
preventing accidents and fatalities.
It is estimated that the close call
reporting form will take no more than
30 minutes to complete for a maximum
total burden of 175 hours (350
E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM
13JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 134 (Thursday, July 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39698-39699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11011]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA-04-19091; Grant 2]
Pipeline Safety: Petition for Waiver; Tuscarora Gas Transmission
Company
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.
ACTION: Grant; petition for waiver.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company (Tuscarora) requests a
waiver of the pipeline safety regulation on valve spacing from PHMSA.
The pipeline safety regulation requires each point on a pipeline in a
Class 1 location be within 10 miles of a block valve. This document
grants Tuscarora's request for waiver.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The pipeline safety regulation at 49 CFR 192.179(a)(4) requires
each point
[[Page 39699]]
on a pipeline in a Class 1 location be within 10 miles of a block
valve, the maximum not to exceed 20 miles. PHMSA, however, reserves the
right to approve an alternative spacing, which will provide an
equivalent level of safety.
During a review of its records, Tuscarora discovered that the
upstream portions of its pipeline in Lassen County, CA, were slightly
re-routed during construction to avoid a sensitive environmental
habitat. As a result, the valve spacing between main line valve (MLV) 8
and MLV-9 exceeds the PHMSA mandated maximum valve space of 20 miles by
1,065 feet. Due to this excessive valve space, Tuscarora requests a
waiver of the valve spacing requirement for this section of line.
As part of its review, PHMSA has taken the following information
into consideration in regards to Tuscarora's waiver request:
The pipeline was re-routed during construction to avoid a
sensitive environmental habitat;
All mainline block valves on the Tuscarora system are
equipped with automatic line break detection and automatic closure
devices;
An existing dirt roadway provides ease of access to the
affected valve location; and
The pipeline segment from MLV-8 to MLV-10 is designed,
operated, and maintained to Class 1 requirements in accordance with 49
CFR part 192.
On October 26, 2004, PHMSA published a notice in the Federal
Register requesting public comment on Tuscarora's waiver request (69 FR
62516). No comments were received.
Grant of Waiver
Based on the information above, PHMSA finds that a waiver from the
requirement of Sec. 192.179(a)(4) is not inconsistent with pipeline
safety and does provide an equivalent level of safety to that required
by the regulation. Specifically, Tuscarora's entire mainline block
valves are equipped with automatic line break detection and automatic
closure devices. Therefore, Tuscarora's request for waiver from the
regulatory requirements of Sec. 192.179(a)(4) is granted between MLV-8
and MLV-9.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60118(c) and 49 CFR 1.53.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 6, 2006.
Joy Kadnar,
Director-Engineering Services, Security, and Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. E6-11011 Filed 7-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P