Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Sunset Lake, Wildwood Crest, NJ, 39609-39611 [E6-10975]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 134 / Thursday, July 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
V. Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
For the reasons set forth above, we
hereby withdraw the notice of proposed
rulemaking imposing the fifth special
measure authorized by 31 U.S.C.
5318A(b)(5) against Multibanka for
purposes of section 5318A as published
in the Federal Register on April 26,
2005 (70 FR 21362).
Dated: May 12, 2006.
Robert W. Werner,
Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network.
[FR Doc. E6–10941 Filed 7–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–06–066]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Sunset Lake, Wildwood Crest,
NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish permanent special local
regulations during the ‘‘Sunset Lake
Hydrofest’’, a marine event to be held
annually on the last weekend in
September or the first weekend in
October on the waters of Sunset Lake,
Wildwood Crest, New Jersey. For 2006
this marine event will be held on
September 30 and October 1, 2006.
These special local regulations are
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in portions of Sunset Lake during
the event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
August 14, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(dpi), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia
23704–5004, hand-deliver them to
Room 415 at the same address between
9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays, or fax
them to (757) 398–6203. The
Inspections and Investigations Branch,
Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:46 Jul 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the above
address between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Sens, Project Manager,
Inspections and Investigations Branch,
at (757) 398–6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD05–06–066),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
39609
weekend in September or the first
weekend in October, and will restrict
general navigation in the regulated area
during the event. Determination of the
weekend schedule for this event is
dependent on tide cycles that will
provide safe race conditions. The Coast
Guard will publish a Notice of
Enforcement in the Federal Register and
in the Fifth Coast Guard District Local
Notice to Mariners that announces the
dates and times this rule is in effect. For
2006, the enforcement period of the
regulation would be on September 30
and October 1, 2006. Except for
participants and vessels authorized by
the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel will be allowed to enter
or remain in the regulated area. These
regulations are needed to control vessel
traffic during the event to enhance the
safety of participants, spectators and
transiting vessels.
Background and Purpose
Annually, the Sunset Lake Hydrofest
Association sponsors the ‘‘Sunset Lake
Hydrofest’’, on the waters of Sunset
Lake near Wildwood Crest, New Jersey.
The event consists of approximately 100
inboard hydroplanes, Jersey speed skiffs
and flat-bottom ski boats racing in heats
counter-clockwise around an oval
racecourse. A fleet of approximately 100
spectator vessels is anticipated to gather
nearby to view the competition. Due to
the need for vessel control during the
event, vessel traffic will be temporarily
restricted to provide for the safety of
participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
Although this proposed permanent
rule will prevent traffic from transiting
a portion of Sunset Lake during the
event, the effect of this regulation would
not be significant due to the limited
duration that the regulated area will be
in effect. Extensive advance
notifications will be made to the
maritime community via Local Notice to
Mariners, marine information
broadcasts, and area newspapers, so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly. Additionally, the proposed
regulated area has been narrowly
tailored to impose the least impact on
general navigation yet provide the level
of safety deemed necessary. Vessel
traffic will be able to transit Sunset Lake
by navigating around the regulated area.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
this permanent special local regulation
on specified waters of Sunset Lake. This
rule would be enforced annually from
8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on the last
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to the address
listed under ADDRESSES explaining why
one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
39610
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 134 / Thursday, July 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of Sunset Lake
during the event.
This proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This proposed
rule would be in effect for only a limited
period. Vessel traffic could pass safely
around the proposed regulated area.
Before the enforcement period, we will
issue maritime advisories so mariners
can adjust their plans accordingly.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the proposed rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact
the address listed under ADDRESSES. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this proposed rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:46 Jul 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Protection of Children
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, and Department of
Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, which guides the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f),
and have concluded that there are no
factors in this case that would limit the
use of a categorical exclusion under
section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Special
local regulations issued in conjunction
with a regatta or marine parade permit
are specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under that
section.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h),
of the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we
make the final decision on whether to
categorically exclude this rule from
further environmental review.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 134 / Thursday, July 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 100.535 to read as follows:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
§ 100.535,
NJ.
Sunset Lake, Wildwood Crest,
(a) Definitions: The following
definitions apply to this section; (1)
Coast Guard Patrol Commander means
a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer of the Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Commander, Coast
Guard Sector Delaware Bay.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay with
a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(3) Participant includes all vessels
participating in the Sunset Lake
Hydrofest under the auspices of the
Marine Event Permit issued to the event
sponsor and approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay.
(b) Regulated area: Includes all waters
of Sunset Lake, New Jersey, from
shoreline to shoreline, south of latitude
38°58′32″ N. All coordinates reference
Datum: NAD 1983.
(c) Special local regulations: (1)
Except for event participants and
persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area must: (i) Stop the vessel
immediately when directed to do so by
any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official
Patrol.
(iii) When authorized to transit the
regulated area, all vessels shall proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course that minimizes
wake near the race course.
(d) Enforcement period: This section
will be enforced annually from 8:30 a.m.
to 5:30 p.m. on the last weekend in
September or the first weekend in
October. The Commander, Fifth Coast
Guard District will publish a Notice of
Enforcement in the Federal Register and
in the Fifth Coast Guard District Local
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:46 Jul 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Notice to Mariners every year
announcing the dates and times this
section is in effect. In 2006 this section
will be enforced from 8:30 a.m. on
September 30, 2006 to 5:30 p.m. on
October 1, 2006.
Dated: June 29, 2006.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–10975 Filed 7–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–06–069]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Choptank River, Cambridge,
MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish permanent special local
regulations during the ‘‘Chesapeakeman
Ultra Triathlon’’, a marine event to be
held annually on the last Saturday in
September on the waters of the
Choptank River at Cambridge, MD. For
2006 this marine event will be held on
September 30, 2006. These special local
regulations are necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters
during the event. This action is
intended to temporarily restrict vessel
traffic in a portion of the Choptank
River during the Chesapeakeman Ultra
Triathlon swim.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
August 14, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(dpi), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia
23704–5004, hand-deliver them to
Room 416 at the same address between
9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays, or fax
them to (757) 391–8149. The
Inspections and Investigations Branch,
Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the above
address between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39611
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Sens, Project Manager,
Inspections and Investigations Branch,
at (757) 398–6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD05–06–069),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to the address
listed under ADDRESSES explaining why
one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
Annually, the Columbia Triathlon
Association sponsors the
‘‘Chesapeakeman Ultra Triathlon’’ on
the waters of the Choptank River near
Cambridge, Maryland. The swimming
segment of the event will consist of
approximately 300 swimmers
competing across a 2.4-mile course
along the Choptank River between the
Hyatt Regency Chesapeake Bay Resort
Beach and Great Marsh Park,
Cambridge, Maryland. The competition
will begin at the Hyatt Regency Beach.
The participants will swim across to the
finish line located at Great Marsh Park,
swimming approximately 100 yards off
shore, parallel with the shoreline.
Approximately 20 support vessels will
accompany the swimmers. Due to the
need for vessel control during the
swimming event, the Coast Guard will
temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the
event area to provide for the safety of
participants, support craft and other
transiting vessels.
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 134 (Thursday, July 13, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39609-39611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10975]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05-06-066]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Sunset Lake,
Wildwood Crest, NJ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish permanent special local
regulations during the ``Sunset Lake Hydrofest'', a marine event to be
held annually on the last weekend in September or the first weekend in
October on the waters of Sunset Lake, Wildwood Crest, New Jersey. For
2006 this marine event will be held on September 30 and October 1,
2006. These special local regulations are necessary to provide for the
safety of life on navigable waters during the event. This action is
intended to restrict vessel traffic in portions of Sunset Lake during
the event.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before August 14, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander
(dpi), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth,
Virginia 23704-5004, hand-deliver them to Room 415 at the same address
between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays, or fax them to (757) 398-6203. The Inspections and
Investigations Branch, Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the public
docket for this rulemaking. Comments and material received from the
public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part of this docket and will be
available for inspection or copying at the above address between 9 a.m.
and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Sens, Project Manager,
Inspections and Investigations Branch, at (757) 398-6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD05-06-
066), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to the address listed under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would
aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
Annually, the Sunset Lake Hydrofest Association sponsors the
``Sunset Lake Hydrofest'', on the waters of Sunset Lake near Wildwood
Crest, New Jersey. The event consists of approximately 100 inboard
hydroplanes, Jersey speed skiffs and flat-bottom ski boats racing in
heats counter-clockwise around an oval racecourse. A fleet of
approximately 100 spectator vessels is anticipated to gather nearby to
view the competition. Due to the need for vessel control during the
event, vessel traffic will be temporarily restricted to provide for the
safety of participants, spectators and transiting vessels.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish this permanent special local
regulation on specified waters of Sunset Lake. This rule would be
enforced annually from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on the last weekend in
September or the first weekend in October, and will restrict general
navigation in the regulated area during the event. Determination of the
weekend schedule for this event is dependent on tide cycles that will
provide safe race conditions. The Coast Guard will publish a Notice of
Enforcement in the Federal Register and in the Fifth Coast Guard
District Local Notice to Mariners that announces the dates and times
this rule is in effect. For 2006, the enforcement period of the
regulation would be on September 30 and October 1, 2006. Except for
participants and vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel will be allowed to enter or remain in
the regulated area. These regulations are needed to control vessel
traffic during the event to enhance the safety of participants,
spectators and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this proposed permanent rule will prevent traffic from
transiting a portion of Sunset Lake during the event, the effect of
this regulation would not be significant due to the limited duration
that the regulated area will be in effect. Extensive advance
notifications will be made to the maritime community via Local Notice
to Mariners, marine information broadcasts, and area newspapers, so
mariners can adjust their plans accordingly. Additionally, the proposed
regulated area has been narrowly tailored to impose the least impact on
general navigation yet provide the level of safety deemed necessary.
Vessel traffic will be able to transit Sunset Lake by navigating around
the regulated area.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
[[Page 39610]]
The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in a portion of
Sunset Lake during the event.
This proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
proposed rule would be in effect for only a limited period. Vessel
traffic could pass safely around the proposed regulated area. Before
the enforcement period, we will issue maritime advisories so mariners
can adjust their plans accordingly.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact the address listed
under ADDRESSES. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive
5100.1, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Special local regulations issued in
conjunction with a regatta or marine parade permit are specifically
excluded from further analysis and documentation under that section.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we make the final decision on whether
to categorically exclude this rule from further environmental review.
[[Page 39611]]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 100.535 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.535, Sunset Lake, Wildwood Crest, NJ.
(a) Definitions: The following definitions apply to this section;
(1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay with a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(3) Participant includes all vessels participating in the Sunset
Lake Hydrofest under the auspices of the Marine Event Permit issued to
the event sponsor and approved by Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Delaware Bay.
(b) Regulated area: Includes all waters of Sunset Lake, New Jersey,
from shoreline to shoreline, south of latitude 38[deg]58[min]32[sec] N.
All coordinates reference Datum: NAD 1983.
(c) Special local regulations: (1) Except for event participants
and persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area must: (i) Stop
the vessel immediately when directed to do so by any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official Patrol.
(iii) When authorized to transit the regulated area, all vessels
shall proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course
that minimizes wake near the race course.
(d) Enforcement period: This section will be enforced annually from
8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on the last weekend in September or the first
weekend in October. The Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District will
publish a Notice of Enforcement in the Federal Register and in the
Fifth Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners every year
announcing the dates and times this section is in effect. In 2006 this
section will be enforced from 8:30 a.m. on September 30, 2006 to 5:30
p.m. on October 1, 2006.
Dated: June 29, 2006.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6-10975 Filed 7-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P