Home Schooling and Educational Institution, 39616-39618 [E6-10969]
Download as PDF
39616
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 134 / Thursday, July 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
September 23, 2006 to 4:30 p.m. on
September 24, 2006.
Dated: June 29, 2006.
L.L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–10982 Filed 7–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900–AM37
Home Schooling and Educational
Institution
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
adjudication regulation regarding the
definition of a child for purposes of
establishing entitlement to additional
monetary benefits for a child who is
home-schooled. VA proposes to define
educational institutions to include
home-school programs that meet the
legal requirements of the States (by
complying with the compulsory
attendance laws of the States) in which
they are located.
DATES: Comments must be received by
VA on or before September 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted by: mail or hand-delivery to
the Director, Regulations Management
(00REG1), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave., NW., Room
1068, Washington, DC 20420; fax to
(202) 273–9026; or, through https://
www.Regulations.gov. Comments
should indicate that they are submitted
in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AM37.’’ All
comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Office of
Regulation Policy and Management,
Room 1063B, between the hours of 8
a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through
Friday (except holidays). Please call
(202) 273–9515 for an appointment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maya Ferrandino, Regulations Staff,
Compensation and Pension Service,
Veterans Benefits Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 273–7210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A veteran
who is entitled to compensation under
the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1114 or 1134
is also entitled, under certain
circumstances, to additional
compensation for dependents, including
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:46 Jul 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
a child. A veteran who is entitled to
pension under the provisions of 38
U.S.C. 1521 also is entitled to a higher
annual rate of pension because of his or
her dependents, including a child.
Additional dependency and indemnity
compensation and death pension may
also be payable based on the number of
the surviving spouse’s dependent
children. In addition, under certain
circumstances, a deceased veteran’s
children may be entitled to these
benefits in their own right.
A child is defined in 38 U.S.C.
101(4)(A)(iii) to include a person who is
unmarried, and, after attaining the age
of eighteen years and until completion
of education or training (but not after
attaining the age of twenty-three years),
is pursuing a course of instruction at an
approved educational institution. The
implementing regulation is at 38 CFR
3.57(a)(1)(iii).
Section 104(a) of title 38, United
States Code, provides that, for the
purpose of determining whether
benefits are payable (except those under
chapter 35, title 38, United States Code)
for a child over age eighteen and under
the age of twenty-three years who is
attending a school, college, academy,
seminary, technical institute, university
or other educational institution, the
Secretary may approve or disapprove
such educational institutions.
In a precedent opinion dated March
19, 1998 (VAOPGCPREC 3–98), VA’s
General Counsel interpreted the term
‘‘educational institution’’ to include
only institutions that are similar in type
to the institutions specifically
enumerated in 38 U.S.C. 104(a). The
General Counsel discussed the
definition of ‘‘institution’’ and
additionally concluded that a person
who is receiving instruction in a homeschool program is not pursuing a course
of instruction at an educational
institution and therefore does not
qualify as a child within the meaning of
38 U.S.C. 101(4)(A)(iii).
On March 8, 2000, VA published a
final rule amending 38 CFR
3.57(a)(1)(iii) to provide a definition of
education institution, and specifically
excluded home-school programs from
the scope of the term ‘‘educational
institution.’’ In publishing the
amendment as a final rule rather than
going through notice and comment
under the Administrative Procedure
Act, VA stated that the rule interpreted
statutory provisions and made nonsubstantive changes.
In Theiss v. Principi, 18 Vet. App. 204
(2004), the United States Court of
Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court)
invalidated VAOPGCPREC 3–98 and the
March 8, 2000 rulemaking that excluded
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
home-school programs from the
definition of ‘‘educational institution.’’
Although the holding in Theiss was
based on the Veterans Court’s
disagreement with VA’s decision to
publish the amendment to
§ 3.57(a)(1)(iii) as a final rule without
first inviting public comment, the Court
also discussed the underlying validity of
the rule’s exclusion of home-school
programs. The Court raised concerns
regarding the basis for the General
Counsel’s interpretation of ‘‘educational
institution’’ in VAOPGCPREC 3–98 and
the focus in that precedent opinion on
the characteristics that differentiated a
home-school program from the
specifically enumerated educational
institutions found in section 104(a) of
title 38. According to the Court, home
schooling has important aspects in
common with the enumerated programs
in section 104(a): ‘‘They are all
educational programs; they all have
instructors and instructional material;
and they all involve some form of
accreditation.’’ 18 Vet. App. at 211.
We propose to amend 38 CFR 3.57 to
define educational institution, and to
include home-school programs as
educational institutions. We propose
that the definition will apply to this
section and to 38 CFR 3.667, School
attendance, which is a corresponding
regulation regarding effective dates for
awards based on a child’s school
attendance.
The Court in Theiss discussed various
dictionary definitions for the term
‘‘educational institution.’’ ‘‘Educational
institution’’ has been defined as ‘‘[a]
school, seminary, college, university, or
other educational facility.’’ It is also
defined as ‘‘[a]n institution for the
teaching and improvement of its
students or pupils; a school, seminary,
college, or university * * * Art
galleries, museums, public libraries,
even labor union buildings have at
times been held to be educational
institutions.’’ A ‘‘facility’’ is defined as
‘‘a building, special room, etc. that
facilitates or makes possible some
activity.’’ The Court also noted that
‘‘institution’’ has been variously defined
as: an established organization or
corporation (as a college or university)
especially of a public character;
something that has been established,
particularly a place where an
educational or charitable enterprise is
conducted; and an ‘‘establishment
* * *devoted to the promotion of a
particular object.’’ The Court noted that
certain dictionaries define
‘‘establishment’’ to include ‘‘a
household’’, and define ‘‘organization’’
to include a group of persons organized
for a particular purpose. The Court
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 134 / Thursday, July 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
noted that the word ‘‘organization’’ has
also been defined to refer to a group of
people with more or less constant
membership. The Court cited
Ballentine’s Law Dictionary at 390 (3rd
Ed. 1969), Black’s Law Dictionary 546
(6th Ed. 1990), Black’s Law Dictionary
at 532 (7th Ed. 1999), Webster’s Third
New International Dictionary 1590
(1976), Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate
Dictionary 627 (1990), The American
Heritage Dictionary of The English
Language at 936, 1275 (3rd Edition), and
The Random House Dictionary of the
English Language at 737 (1967), as
support for these definitions. Theiss, 18
Vet. App. 209–211.
The references in the various
definitions to ‘‘establishments’’ and
‘‘established organizations’’ and to
examples such as schools, colleges, and
universities suggest that educational
institutions are most commonly
characterized by a degree of permanence
in time and location and by the
provision of education to a group of
individuals. As suggested in Theiss,
however, it also may be reasonable to
construe the term ‘‘educational
institution’’ to include some programs,
such as home-school programs, that do
not meet those general standards of
permanence or numerosity, but which
are established in accordance with State
law for the specific purpose of
providing educational instruction. We
believe it is appropriate that home
schools that operate in compliance with
the compulsory attendance laws of the
States in which they are located,
whether treated as private schools or
home schools under State law,
constitute ‘‘educational institutions’’.
Accordingly, we propose to establish
a two-part definition of ‘‘educational
institution.’’ First, we propose to state
that the term ‘‘educational institution’’
means ‘‘a permanent organization that
offers courses of instruction to a group
of students who meet its enrollment
criteria, including schools, colleges,
academies, seminaries, technical
institutes, and universities.’’ Second, we
propose to state that the term ‘‘also
includes home schools that operate in
compliance with the compulsory
attendance laws of the States in which
they are located, whether treated as
private schools or home schools under
State law.’’ Third, in order to clarify that
home schools are distinct entities from
post-secondary institutions, such as
colleges and universities, we propose to
state that the term ‘‘home schools’’ is
limited to courses of instruction for
grades kindergarten through 12.
Lastly, we note that 38 CFR part 3
does not include a regulation describing
VA’s criteria for approving educational
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:46 Jul 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
39617
institutions. We plan to promulgate
such a rule in the near future and allow
notice and comment in accordance with
the Administrative Procedures Act.
one year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, and
tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
All collections of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501–3521) referenced in this proposed
rule has an existing OMB approval as a
form. The form is VA Form 21–674,
Request for Approval of School
Attendance, OMB approval number
2900–0049. No changes are made in this
proposed rule to the collection of
information.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
proposed rule would not affect any
small entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this proposed rule is
exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
Order classifies a rule as a significant
regulatory action requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget if
it meets any one of a number of
specified conditions, including: having
an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, creating a serious
inconsistency or interfering with an
action of another agency, materially
altering the budgetary impact of
entitlements or the rights of entitlement
recipients, or raising novel legal or
policy issues. VA has examined the
economic, legal, and policy implications
of this proposed rule and has concluded
that it is a significant regulatory action
because it raises novel policy issues.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program numbers and titles
for this proposal are 64.104 Pension for
Non-Service-Connected Disability for
Veterans, 64.105 Pension to Veterans
Surviving Spouses, and Children,
64.109 Veterans Compensation for
Service-Connected Disability, and
64.110 Veterans Dependency and
Indemnity Compensation for ServiceConnected Death.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive
materials, Veterans, Vietnam.
Approved: March 17, 2006.
Gordon H. Mansfield,
Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 3 as follows:
PART 3—ADJUDICATION
1. The authority citation for part 3,
subpart A continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless
otherwise noted.
2. Revise § 3.57(a)(1)(iii) to read as
follows:
§ 3.57
Child.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Who, after reaching the age of 18
years and until completion of education
or training (but not after reaching the
age of 23 years) is pursuing a course of
instruction at an educational institution
approved by the Department of Veterans
Affairs. For the purposes of this section
and § 3.667, the term ‘‘educational
institution’’ means a permanent
organization that offers courses of
instruction to a group of students who
meet its enrollment criteria, including
schools, colleges, academies,
seminaries, technical institutes, and
universities. The term also includes
home schools that operate in
compliance with the compulsory
attendance laws of the States in which
they are located, whether treated as
private schools or home schools under
State law. The term ‘‘home schools’’ is
limited to courses of instruction for
grades kindergarten through 12.
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
39618
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 134 / Thursday, July 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101(4)(A), 104(a))
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–10969 Filed 7–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0485; FRL–8196–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; Redesignation of the
Huntington, WV Portion of the
Huntington-Ashland 8-Hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area to Attainment and
Approval of the Maintenance Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
a redesignation request and a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for
the Huntington portion of the
Huntington-Ashland, WV–KY (herein
referred to as the ‘‘Huntington-Ashland
area’’) interstate area from
nonattainment to attainment of the 8hour ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS). The West
Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection (WVDEP) is requesting that
the Cabell and Wayne County, West
Virginia (Huntington) portion of the
Huntington-Ashland area be
redesignated as attainment for the 8hour ozone NAAQS. The interstate
Huntington-Ashland 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area is comprised of
three counties (Cabell and Wayne
Counties, West Virginia and Boyd
County, Kentucky). EPA is proposing to
approve the ozone redesignation request
for the Huntington portion of the
Huntington-Ashland area. In
conjunction with its redesignation
request, the WVDEP submitted a SIP
revision consisting of a maintenance
plan for Huntington that provides for
continued attainment of the 8-hour
ozone NAAQS for the next 12 years.
EPA is proposing to make a
determination that Huntington has
attained the 8-hour ozone NAAQS based
upon three years of complete, qualityassured ambient air quality ozone
monitoring data for 2003–2005. EPA’s
proposed approval of the 8-hour ozone
redesignation request is based on its
determination that Huntington has met
the criteria for redesignation to
attainment specified in the Clean Air
Act (CAA). EPA is providing
information on the status of its
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:46 Jul 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
adequacy determination for the motor
vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) that
are identified in the Huntington
maintenance plan for purposes of
transportation conformity, and is also
proposing to approve those MVEBs.
EPA is proposing approval of the
redesignation request and of the
maintenance plan revision to the West
Virginia SIP in accordance with the
requirements of the CAA.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 14, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2006–0485 by one of the
following methods:
A. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail: morris.makeba@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPAR03–OAR–2006–0485,
Makeba Morris, Chief, Air Quality
Planning Branch, D. Mailcode 3AP21,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
E. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2006–
0485. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.epa.gov/edocket
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the West Virginia
Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601
57th Street SE, Charleston, WV 25304.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Caprio, (215) 814–2156, or by email at caprio.amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’, or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What Actions Is EPA Proposing To Take?
II. What Is the Background for These
Proposed Actions?
III. What Are the Criteria for Redesignation
to Attainment?
IV. Why Is EPA Taking These Actions?
V. What Would Be the Effect of These
Actions?
VI. What Is EPA’s Analysis of the State’s
Request?
VII. Are the Motor Vehicle Emissions
Budgets Established and Identified in the
Huntington Maintenance Plan Adequate
and Approvable?
VIII. Proposed Action
IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
1. What Actions Is EPA Proposing To
Take?
On May 17, 2006, WVDEP formally
submitted a request to redesignate
Huntington from nonattainment to
attainment of the 8-hour NAAQS for
ozone. On May 17, 2006, West Virginia
submitted a maintenance plan for
Huntington as a SIP revision, to ensure
continued attainment over the next 12
years. Huntington is comprised of
Cabell and Wayne Counties. Huntington
is currently designated as a basic 8-hour
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 134 (Thursday, July 13, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39616-39618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10969]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900-AM37
Home Schooling and Educational Institution
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
adjudication regulation regarding the definition of a child for
purposes of establishing entitlement to additional monetary benefits
for a child who is home-schooled. VA proposes to define educational
institutions to include home-school programs that meet the legal
requirements of the States (by complying with the compulsory attendance
laws of the States) in which they are located.
DATES: Comments must be received by VA on or before September 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted by: mail or hand-delivery
to the Director, Regulations Management (00REG1), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave., NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; fax to (202) 273-9026; or, through https://www.Regulations.gov.
Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response to ``RIN
2900-AM37.'' All comments received will be available for public
inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room
1063B, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday
(except holidays). Please call (202) 273-9515 for an appointment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maya Ferrandino, Regulations Staff,
Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 273-7210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A veteran who is entitled to compensation
under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1114 or 1134 is also entitled, under
certain circumstances, to additional compensation for dependents,
including a child. A veteran who is entitled to pension under the
provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1521 also is entitled to a higher annual rate
of pension because of his or her dependents, including a child.
Additional dependency and indemnity compensation and death pension may
also be payable based on the number of the surviving spouse's dependent
children. In addition, under certain circumstances, a deceased
veteran's children may be entitled to these benefits in their own
right.
A child is defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(4)(A)(iii) to include a person
who is unmarried, and, after attaining the age of eighteen years and
until completion of education or training (but not after attaining the
age of twenty-three years), is pursuing a course of instruction at an
approved educational institution. The implementing regulation is at 38
CFR 3.57(a)(1)(iii).
Section 104(a) of title 38, United States Code, provides that, for
the purpose of determining whether benefits are payable (except those
under chapter 35, title 38, United States Code) for a child over age
eighteen and under the age of twenty-three years who is attending a
school, college, academy, seminary, technical institute, university or
other educational institution, the Secretary may approve or disapprove
such educational institutions.
In a precedent opinion dated March 19, 1998 (VAOPGCPREC 3-98), VA's
General Counsel interpreted the term ``educational institution'' to
include only institutions that are similar in type to the institutions
specifically enumerated in 38 U.S.C. 104(a). The General Counsel
discussed the definition of ``institution'' and additionally concluded
that a person who is receiving instruction in a home-school program is
not pursuing a course of instruction at an educational institution and
therefore does not qualify as a child within the meaning of 38 U.S.C.
101(4)(A)(iii).
On March 8, 2000, VA published a final rule amending 38 CFR
3.57(a)(1)(iii) to provide a definition of education institution, and
specifically excluded home-school programs from the scope of the term
``educational institution.'' In publishing the amendment as a final
rule rather than going through notice and comment under the
Administrative Procedure Act, VA stated that the rule interpreted
statutory provisions and made non-substantive changes.
In Theiss v. Principi, 18 Vet. App. 204 (2004), the United States
Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) invalidated VAOPGCPREC 3-
98 and the March 8, 2000 rulemaking that excluded home-school programs
from the definition of ``educational institution.'' Although the
holding in Theiss was based on the Veterans Court's disagreement with
VA's decision to publish the amendment to Sec. 3.57(a)(1)(iii) as a
final rule without first inviting public comment, the Court also
discussed the underlying validity of the rule's exclusion of home-
school programs. The Court raised concerns regarding the basis for the
General Counsel's interpretation of ``educational institution'' in
VAOPGCPREC 3-98 and the focus in that precedent opinion on the
characteristics that differentiated a home-school program from the
specifically enumerated educational institutions found in section
104(a) of title 38. According to the Court, home schooling has
important aspects in common with the enumerated programs in section
104(a): ``They are all educational programs; they all have instructors
and instructional material; and they all involve some form of
accreditation.'' 18 Vet. App. at 211.
We propose to amend 38 CFR 3.57 to define educational institution,
and to include home-school programs as educational institutions. We
propose that the definition will apply to this section and to 38 CFR
3.667, School attendance, which is a corresponding regulation regarding
effective dates for awards based on a child's school attendance.
The Court in Theiss discussed various dictionary definitions for
the term ``educational institution.'' ``Educational institution'' has
been defined as ``[a] school, seminary, college, university, or other
educational facility.'' It is also defined as ``[a]n institution for
the teaching and improvement of its students or pupils; a school,
seminary, college, or university * * * Art galleries, museums, public
libraries, even labor union buildings have at times been held to be
educational institutions.'' A ``facility'' is defined as ``a building,
special room, etc. that facilitates or makes possible some activity.''
The Court also noted that ``institution'' has been variously defined
as: an established organization or corporation (as a college or
university) especially of a public character; something that has been
established, particularly a place where an educational or charitable
enterprise is conducted; and an ``establishment * * *devoted to the
promotion of a particular object.'' The Court noted that certain
dictionaries define ``establishment'' to include ``a household'', and
define ``organization'' to include a group of persons organized for a
particular purpose. The Court
[[Page 39617]]
noted that the word ``organization'' has also been defined to refer to
a group of people with more or less constant membership. The Court
cited Ballentine's Law Dictionary at 390 (3rd Ed. 1969), Black's Law
Dictionary 546 (6th Ed. 1990), Black's Law Dictionary at 532 (7th Ed.
1999), Webster's Third New International Dictionary 1590 (1976),
Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary 627 (1990), The American
Heritage Dictionary of The English Language at 936, 1275 (3rd Edition),
and The Random House Dictionary of the English Language at 737 (1967),
as support for these definitions. Theiss, 18 Vet. App. 209-211.
The references in the various definitions to ``establishments'' and
``established organizations'' and to examples such as schools,
colleges, and universities suggest that educational institutions are
most commonly characterized by a degree of permanence in time and
location and by the provision of education to a group of individuals.
As suggested in Theiss, however, it also may be reasonable to construe
the term ``educational institution'' to include some programs, such as
home-school programs, that do not meet those general standards of
permanence or numerosity, but which are established in accordance with
State law for the specific purpose of providing educational
instruction. We believe it is appropriate that home schools that
operate in compliance with the compulsory attendance laws of the States
in which they are located, whether treated as private schools or home
schools under State law, constitute ``educational institutions''.
Accordingly, we propose to establish a two-part definition of
``educational institution.'' First, we propose to state that the term
``educational institution'' means ``a permanent organization that
offers courses of instruction to a group of students who meet its
enrollment criteria, including schools, colleges, academies,
seminaries, technical institutes, and universities.'' Second, we
propose to state that the term ``also includes home schools that
operate in compliance with the compulsory attendance laws of the States
in which they are located, whether treated as private schools or home
schools under State law.'' Third, in order to clarify that home schools
are distinct entities from post-secondary institutions, such as
colleges and universities, we propose to state that the term ``home
schools'' is limited to courses of instruction for grades kindergarten
through 12.
Lastly, we note that 38 CFR part 3 does not include a regulation
describing VA's criteria for approving educational institutions. We
plan to promulgate such a rule in the near future and allow notice and
comment in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act.
Paperwork Reduction Act
All collections of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) referenced in this proposed rule has an existing
OMB approval as a form. The form is VA Form 21-674, Request for
Approval of School Attendance, OMB approval number 2900-0049. No
changes are made in this proposed rule to the collection of
information.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. This proposed rule would not affect any small entities.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this proposed rule is exempt
from the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements
of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Order
classifies a rule as a significant regulatory action requiring review
by the Office of Management and Budget if it meets any one of a number
of specified conditions, including: having an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, creating a serious inconsistency or
interfering with an action of another agency, materially altering the
budgetary impact of entitlements or the rights of entitlement
recipients, or raising novel legal or policy issues. VA has examined
the economic, legal, and policy implications of this proposed rule and
has concluded that it is a significant regulatory action because it
raises novel policy issues.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and
titles for this proposal are 64.104 Pension for Non-Service-Connected
Disability for Veterans, 64.105 Pension to Veterans Surviving Spouses,
and Children, 64.109 Veterans Compensation for Service-Connected
Disability, and 64.110 Veterans Dependency and Indemnity Compensation
for Service-Connected Death.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive materials, Veterans, Vietnam.
Approved: March 17, 2006.
Gordon H. Mansfield,
Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 3 as follows:
PART 3--ADJUDICATION
1. The authority citation for part 3, subpart A continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless otherwise noted.
2. Revise Sec. 3.57(a)(1)(iii) to read as follows:
Sec. 3.57 Child.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Who, after reaching the age of 18 years and until completion
of education or training (but not after reaching the age of 23 years)
is pursuing a course of instruction at an educational institution
approved by the Department of Veterans Affairs. For the purposes of
this section and Sec. 3.667, the term ``educational institution''
means a permanent organization that offers courses of instruction to a
group of students who meet its enrollment criteria, including schools,
colleges, academies, seminaries, technical institutes, and
universities. The term also includes home schools that operate in
compliance with the compulsory attendance laws of the States in which
they are located, whether treated as private schools or home schools
under State law. The term ``home schools'' is limited to courses of
instruction for grades kindergarten through 12.
[[Page 39618]]
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101(4)(A), 104(a))
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-10969 Filed 7-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P