Civil Penalty Factors, 39248-39249 [E6-10963]
Download as PDF
39248
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; ROUTES;
AND REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9N,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated September 1, 2005, and
effective, September 15, 2005, is
amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
*
*
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
AWP HI E5 Honolulu International
Airport, HI [Amended]
Honolulu International Airport
(Lat. 21°19′07″ N., long. 157°55′21″ W.)
Kalaeloa John Rodgers Field
(Lat. 21°18′26″ N., long. 158°04′13″ W.)
Honolulu VORTAC
(Lat. 21°18′30″ N., long. 157°55′50″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface south and southwest of
Honolulu International Airport beginning at
lat. 21°20′19″ N, long. 157°49′00″ W., thence
southeast to lat. 21°16′20″ N, long. 157°45′00″
W., thence east along the shoreline to where
the shoreline intercepts the Honolulu
VORTAC 15-mile radius, then clockwise
along the 15-mile radius of the Honolulu
VORTAC to intercept the Honolulu VORTAC
241° radial, then northeast bound along the
Honolulu VORTAC 241° radial to intercept
the 4.3-mile radius south of Kalaeloe John
Rodgers Field, then counterclockwise along
the arc of the 4.3-mile radius of Kalaeloe John
Rodgers Field to and counterclockwise along
the a 5-mile radius of the Honolulu VORTAC
to the Honolulu VORTAC 106° radial, then
westbound along the Honolulu 106° radial to
the 4-mile radius of the Honolulu VORTAC,
then counterclockwise along the 4-mile
radius to intercept the Honolulu VORTAC
071° radial, thence to a point of beginning
and that airspace beginning at lat. 21°10′35″
N., long. 158°11′22″ W.; to lat. 21°16′05″ N.,
long. 158°14′35″ W.; to lat. 21°16′30″ N.,
long. 158°13′46″ W.; to lat. 21°16′50″ N.,
long. 158°00′00″ W.; to the point of
beginning.
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
18:09 Jul 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
Issued in Los Angeles, California, on June
22, 2006.
John Clancy
Area Director, Western Terminal Operations.
[FR Doc. 06–6143 Filed 7–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 1119
Civil Penalty Factors
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed new interpretative
rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Sections 20(b) and (c) of the
Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C.
2069(b), (c), require certain factors to be
considered in assessing and
compromising penalties. A new
interpretative rule is proposed that
identifies and explains other factors that
may be considered by the Commission
and staff in evaluating the
appropriateness and amount of a civil
penalty.1
DATES: The Office of the Secretary must
receive written comments not later than
August 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be captioned ‘‘Civil Penalties’’ and emailed to the Office of the Secretary at
cpsc-os@cpsc.gov. Written comments
may also be sent to the Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814 or by
facsimile at (301) 504–0127.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Gibson Mullan, Assistant Executive
Director, Compliance and Field
Operations at 301–504–7626.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposed
new part 1119 describes factors the
Commission and staff may consider in
determining the appropriateness and
amount of a civil penalty for violations
of section 19(a), which includes the
failure to furnish information required
by section 15(b).
The CPSA provides that a knowing
violation of the prohibited acts
enumerated in section 19(a) could
subject a firm to a civil penalty under
section 20 of the CPSA. In determining
the amount of a civil penalty by
commencing an action pursuant to
section 20(b) or compromising a civil
penalty claim under section 20(c), the
1 Commissioner Thomas H. Moore filed a
statement which is available from the Office of the
Secretary or on the Commission’s Web site at https://
www.cpsc.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Commission and staff consider five
statutory factors set forth in the CPSA:
The nature of the product defect, the
severity of the risk of injury, the number
of defective products distributed, the
occurrence or absence of injury, and the
appropriateness of the penalty in
relation to the size of the business of the
person charged. The proposed
regulation describes that the
Commission and staff may also
consider, as appropriate, one or more of
the following factors in determining the
appropriateness and amount of a civil
penalty: (1) A firm’s previous record of
compliance with CPSA requirements;
(2) timeliness of a firm’s response to
relevant information; (3) safety and
compliance monitoring; (4) cooperation
and good faith; (5) economic gain from
any delay or non-compliance with CPSC
safety or reporting requirements; (6) a
product’s failure rate; and (7) any other
pertinent factors.
The Commission is proposing this
section to provide further clarity and
transparency in how it determines civil
penalty amounts in individual civil
penalty determinations. The
Commission believes that adoption of
this proposed regulation will result in a
better understanding by the public of
the Commission’s approach to
determining the appropriateness and
amount of a civil penalty.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 1119
Administrative practice and
procedure, Business and Industry,
Consumer protection, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, 16 CFR part 1119 is
proposed to be added to read as follows:
PART 1119—CIVIL PENALTY
FACTORS
Sec.
§ 1119.1 Factors considered in determining
civil penalties.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2058, 2063, 2064,
2067(b), 2068, 2069, 2076(e), 2084.
§ 1119.1 Factors considered in
determining civil penalties.
(a) Statutory Factors. Section 20 of the
Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA)
specifies five factors that shall be
considered by the Commission in
determining the amount of a civil
penalty to be sought for violations of
section 19(a), which includes failure to
furnish information to the Commission
as required by section 15(b). Those
factors are: The nature of the product
defect, the severity of the risk of injury,
the number of defective products
distributed, the occurrence or absence of
injury, and the appropriateness of [the]
E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM
12JYP1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules
penalty in relation to the size of the
business of the person charged. The Act
also allows the Commission to
compromise any civil penalty under
section 20. In determining the amount
of a penalty settlement, the Commission
is instructed to consider the same five
factors.
(b) Other factors. In determining the
appropriateness and the amount of any
civil penalty to be pursued in
negotiations when a violation of the
reporting requirements of section 15(b)
or other requirements of section 19(a)
have occurred, in addition to the
statutory factors set forth in section 20
of the CPSA, the Commission and the
staff may consider, as appropriate, one
or more of the following:
(1) Previous record of compliance.
The Commission and the staff may
consider whether the firm has had
previous safety, reporting or other
violations, and, if so, whether the firm
has taken action to address previous
violations and to improve compliance
with applicable CPSC safety
requirements.
(2) Timeliness of response. With
regard to the matter under review, the
Commission and the staff may consider
how quickly the firm responded to
relevant information it obtained (or
reasonably should have obtained), and
the extent to which any injuries might
reasonably have been prevented by
more timely reporting or other required
action.
(3) Safety and compliance monitoring.
The Commission and the staff may
consider the extent to which the firm
has adopted a system for collecting and
analyzing safety information and for
evaluating reporting issues (including
such system’s application in the matter
under review).
(4) Cooperation and good faith. The
Commission and the staff may consider
the degree to which the firm cooperated
and acted in good faith to address
reporting or other product safety
violations or other issues, both generally
and with regard to the specific matter
under review.
(5) Economic gain from noncompliance. The Commission and the
staff may consider the extent to which
the firm profited or otherwise benefitted
from an improper delay in reporting or
complying with other applicable CPSC
safety requirements.
(6) Product failure rate. With regard to
the product and matter under review,
the Commission and the staff may
consider the reasonably expected rate of
failure for that type of product over
time.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:09 Jul 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
(7) Any other pertinent factors. The
Commission and staff may consider any
other pertinent factors.
Dated: July 7, 2006.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–10963 Filed 7–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
16 CFR Parts 1500 and 1507
Amendment to Fireworks Safety
Standards; Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking; Request for
Comments and Information
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission is
considering whether there may be a
need to update and strengthen its
regulation of fireworks devices. This
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
(‘‘ANPR’’) initiates a rulemaking
proceeding under the Federal
Hazardous Substances Act (‘‘FHSA’’).
The Commission is soliciting written
comments concerning the risks of injury
associated with fireworks that do not
comply with the current fireworks
device regulations, the regulatory
options discussed in this notice, other
possible ways to address these risks,
and the economic impacts of the various
regulatory alternatives. The Commission
also invites interested persons to submit
an existing standard, or a statement of
intent to modify or develop a voluntary
standard, to address the risk of injury
described in this notice.1
DATES: Written comments and
submissions in response to this notice
must be received by September 11,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be emailed to cpsc-os@cpsc.gov. Comments
should be captioned ‘‘FIREWORKS
ANPR.’’ Comments may also be mailed,
preferably in five copies, to the Office of
the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, Room 502, 4330 East-West
Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, or
delivered to the same address
(telephone (301) 504–0800). Comments
also may be filed by facsimile to
(301)504–0127.
1 Commissioner Thomas H. Moore filed a
statement which is available from the Office of the
Secretary or on the Commission’s Web site at https://
www.cpsc.gov.
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara E. Parisi, Office of General
Counsel, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East-West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814; telephone
(301) 504–7879 or e-mail:
bparisi@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
PO 00000
39249
Sfmt 4702
On May 14, 1973, the Consumer
Product Safety Commission, pursuant to
section 30(a) of the Consumer Product
Safety Act (CPSA) (15 U.S.C. 2079(a)),
assumed responsibility for and
administration of the FHSA. On
September 27, 1973 (38 FR 27012), the
Commission transferred existing
fireworks regulations under the FHSA
from 21 CFR parts 191 and 191d to 16
CFR parts 1500 and 1507.
In addition to these mandatory CPSC
regulations, the American Fireworks
Standards Laboratory (AFSL) has
developed voluntary standards
pertaining to fireworks. The AFSL
standards incorporate both CPSC and
Department of Transportation
regulations as well as a number of
standards developed by AFSL that are
in addition to Federal requirements.
AFSL is an independent, non-profit
corporation that was established in 1989
by members of the fireworks industry. It
is administered by a 12-member Board
of Directors representing companies that
manufacture or import fireworks into
the United States. Currently, AFSL has
approximately 140 U.S. importer
members in its program. AFSL tests
fireworks in China for its members prior
to exportation to the United States.
Other testing organizations offer similar
services in China, generally following
the AFSL standards or close variation.
B. The Product
A firecracker is a device consisting of
an explosive pyrotechnic composition
in a fused container with the primary
function of producing an audible effect.
The term ‘‘fireworks devices’’ includes
firecrackers and other devices using a
pyrotechnic composition which when
ignited produce visual and sometimes
audible effects. Fireworks devices
include consumer fireworks, which are
regulated by the CPSC, and
professional/display fireworks, which
fall under the jurisdiction of the Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and
Explosives. Consumer fireworks
generally fall into the following twelve
device classifications: (1) Combination
items; (2) Comets, Mines and Shells; (3)
Firecrackers; (4) Fountains; (5) Ground
Spinners and Chasers; (6) Specialty
Items; (7) Party, Trick and Toy Smoke
E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM
12JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 12, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39248-39249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10963]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 1119
Civil Penalty Factors
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Proposed new interpretative rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Sections 20(b) and (c) of the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15
U.S.C. 2069(b), (c), require certain factors to be considered in
assessing and compromising penalties. A new interpretative rule is
proposed that identifies and explains other factors that may be
considered by the Commission and staff in evaluating the
appropriateness and amount of a civil penalty.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Commissioner Thomas H. Moore filed a statement which is
available from the Office of the Secretary or on the Commission's
Web site at https://www.cpsc.gov.
DATES: The Office of the Secretary must receive written comments not
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
later than August 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be captioned ``Civil Penalties'' and
e-mailed to the Office of the Secretary at cpsc-os@cpsc.gov. Written
comments may also be sent to the Office of the Secretary, Consumer
Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland
20814 or by facsimile at (301) 504-0127.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Gibson Mullan, Assistant
Executive Director, Compliance and Field Operations at 301-504-7626.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposed new part 1119 describes factors the
Commission and staff may consider in determining the appropriateness
and amount of a civil penalty for violations of section 19(a), which
includes the failure to furnish information required by section 15(b).
The CPSA provides that a knowing violation of the prohibited acts
enumerated in section 19(a) could subject a firm to a civil penalty
under section 20 of the CPSA. In determining the amount of a civil
penalty by commencing an action pursuant to section 20(b) or
compromising a civil penalty claim under section 20(c), the Commission
and staff consider five statutory factors set forth in the CPSA: The
nature of the product defect, the severity of the risk of injury, the
number of defective products distributed, the occurrence or absence of
injury, and the appropriateness of the penalty in relation to the size
of the business of the person charged. The proposed regulation
describes that the Commission and staff may also consider, as
appropriate, one or more of the following factors in determining the
appropriateness and amount of a civil penalty: (1) A firm's previous
record of compliance with CPSA requirements; (2) timeliness of a firm's
response to relevant information; (3) safety and compliance monitoring;
(4) cooperation and good faith; (5) economic gain from any delay or
non-compliance with CPSC safety or reporting requirements; (6) a
product's failure rate; and (7) any other pertinent factors.
The Commission is proposing this section to provide further clarity
and transparency in how it determines civil penalty amounts in
individual civil penalty determinations. The Commission believes that
adoption of this proposed regulation will result in a better
understanding by the public of the Commission's approach to determining
the appropriateness and amount of a civil penalty.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 1119
Administrative practice and procedure, Business and Industry,
Consumer protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, 16 CFR part 1119 is proposed to be added to read as
follows:
PART 1119--CIVIL PENALTY FACTORS
Sec.
Sec. 1119.1 Factors considered in determining civil penalties.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2058, 2063, 2064, 2067(b), 2068, 2069,
2076(e), 2084.
Sec. 1119.1 Factors considered in determining civil penalties.
(a) Statutory Factors. Section 20 of the Consumer Product Safety
Act (CPSA) specifies five factors that shall be considered by the
Commission in determining the amount of a civil penalty to be sought
for violations of section 19(a), which includes failure to furnish
information to the Commission as required by section 15(b). Those
factors are: The nature of the product defect, the severity of the risk
of injury, the number of defective products distributed, the occurrence
or absence of injury, and the appropriateness of [the]
[[Page 39249]]
penalty in relation to the size of the business of the person charged.
The Act also allows the Commission to compromise any civil penalty
under section 20. In determining the amount of a penalty settlement,
the Commission is instructed to consider the same five factors.
(b) Other factors. In determining the appropriateness and the
amount of any civil penalty to be pursued in negotiations when a
violation of the reporting requirements of section 15(b) or other
requirements of section 19(a) have occurred, in addition to the
statutory factors set forth in section 20 of the CPSA, the Commission
and the staff may consider, as appropriate, one or more of the
following:
(1) Previous record of compliance. The Commission and the staff may
consider whether the firm has had previous safety, reporting or other
violations, and, if so, whether the firm has taken action to address
previous violations and to improve compliance with applicable CPSC
safety requirements.
(2) Timeliness of response. With regard to the matter under review,
the Commission and the staff may consider how quickly the firm
responded to relevant information it obtained (or reasonably should
have obtained), and the extent to which any injuries might reasonably
have been prevented by more timely reporting or other required action.
(3) Safety and compliance monitoring. The Commission and the staff
may consider the extent to which the firm has adopted a system for
collecting and analyzing safety information and for evaluating
reporting issues (including such system's application in the matter
under review).
(4) Cooperation and good faith. The Commission and the staff may
consider the degree to which the firm cooperated and acted in good
faith to address reporting or other product safety violations or other
issues, both generally and with regard to the specific matter under
review.
(5) Economic gain from non-compliance. The Commission and the staff
may consider the extent to which the firm profited or otherwise
benefitted from an improper delay in reporting or complying with other
applicable CPSC safety requirements.
(6) Product failure rate. With regard to the product and matter
under review, the Commission and the staff may consider the reasonably
expected rate of failure for that type of product over time.
(7) Any other pertinent factors. The Commission and staff may
consider any other pertinent factors.
Dated: July 7, 2006.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-10963 Filed 7-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P