Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 7X Airplane, Windshield Coating in Lieu of Wipers, 39235-39237 [E6-10894]

Download as PDF 39235 Proposed Rules Federal Register Vol. 71, No. 133 Wednesday, July 12, 2006 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION 12 CFR Part 615 RIN 3052–AC23 Funding and Fiscal Affairs, Loan Policies and Operations, and Funding Operations; Investments in Farmers’ Notes Farm Credit Administration. ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. AGENCY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA or Agency) withdraws its proposed rule to amend regulations governing investments in farmers’ notes (Farmers’ Notes), and terminates this rulemaking. This notice informs the public that this rulemaking has ended. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dawn Johnson, Policy Analyst, Office of Regulatory Policy, Farm Credit Administration, Aurora, CO (303) 696–9737, TTY (303) 696–9259. or Richard A. Katz, Senior Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102– 5090, (703) 883–4020, TTY (703) 883– 4020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FCA terminates this rulemaking by withdrawing its proposed rule to amend the Farmers’ Notes regulation. This rulemaking began on April 20, 2000 (65 FR 21151), when the FCA published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking that asked the public questions about ways to improve the funding and discount relationship between Farm Credit banks and other financing institutions (OFIs).1 In addition to recommendations for improving the OFI program, some commenters suggested that the FCA also explore other ways for the Farm Credit System (System or FCS) to provide funding and liquidity to nonSystem agricultural lenders. In response to these comments, the FCA held a public meeting in Des Moines, Iowa on wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: 1 See August 3, 2001, that addressed both OFIs and ‘‘other types of partnering relationships between System and nonSystem lending institutions that would increase the availability of funds to agriculture and rural America.’’ 2 At the public meeting, System and non-System commenters encouraged the FCA to promote other arrangements, in addition to the OFI program, that would make it easier for the FCS to provide funding and liquidity to non-System agricultural lenders. Many commenters expressed their desire for more flexible and informal arrangements between FCS and non-System agricultural lenders. On August 11, 2003, the FCA adopted a proposed rule (original proposed rule) on OFIs and Farmers’ Notes.3 The FCA received 105 comment letters from both System and non-System lenders that specifically addressed Farmers’ Notes. All 98 non-System commenters opposed the original proposed rule primarily because they believed that it would give System associations a competitive advantage over commercial banks. Seven System commenters expressed the view that revising the Farmers’ Note program could strengthen cooperation between the FCS and non-System lenders and increase the flow of credit to agriculture. However, many FCS commenters sought significant changes to the proposal. Based on these comments, the FCA adopted a final rule on OFIs, but reproposed the Farmers’ Notes rule.4 The second proposed rule (reproposed rule) that the FCA issued on September 14, 2004, sought to address the concerns of both System and non-System commenters.5 The FCA received 776 comment letters in response to the reproposed rule. Six FCS commenters told the FCA that the reproposed rule would dissuade System associations from investing in Farmers’ Notes because it was too restrictive. The remaining 770 comment letters came from commercial bankers or their trade associations who opposed the reproposed rule for the same reasons that they opposed the original proposed rule. These comment letters lead the FCA to conclude that enacting a final rule on Farmers’ Notes is unlikely to achieve 65 FR 21151 (April 20, 2000). VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:09 Jul 11, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 2 See 66 FR 35428 (July 5, 2001). 68 FR 47502 (August 11, 2003). 4 See 69 FR 29852 (May 26, 2004). 5 See 69 FR 55362 (September 14, 2004). 3 See Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 the Agency’s objectives of increasing cooperation between System and nonSystem lenders so more credit is available for agriculture and rural America. For this reason, the FCA withdraws the proposed rule and terminates this rulemaking. Dated: July 6, 2006. Roland E. Smith, Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. [FR Doc. E6–10940 Filed 7–11–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6705–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 25 [Docket No. NM348; Notice No. 25–06–07– SC] Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 7X Airplane, Windshield Coating in Lieu of Wipers Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for the Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 7X airplane. This airplane will have a novel or unusual design feature(s) associated with use of a hydrophobic coating, rather than windshield wipers, as the means to maintain a clear portion of the windshield during precipitation conditions, as required by the airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These proposed special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards. DATES: We must receive your comments by August 28, 2006. ADDRESSES: You must mail two copies of your comments to: Federal Aviation Administration, Transport Airplane Directorate, Attn: Rules Docket (ANM– 113), Docket No. NM348, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356. You may deliver two copies to the Transport Airplane E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM 12JYP1 39236 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules Directorate at the above address. You must mark your comments: Docket No. NM348 You can inspect comments in the Rules Docket weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John McConnell, Airplane and Flight Crew Interface Branch, ANM–111, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–1365; facsimile (425) 227–1320, e-mail john.mcconnell@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS Comments Invited We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. We ask that you send us two copies of written comments. We will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning these special conditions. You can inspect the docket before and after the comment closing date. If you wish to review the docket in person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change these special conditions based on the comments we receive. If you want the FAA to acknowledge receipt of your comments on this proposal, include with your comments a pre-addressed, stamped postcard on which the docket number appears. We will stamp the date on the postcard and mail it back to you. Background On June 4, 2002, Dassault Aviation applied for a type certificate for its new Model Falcon 7X airplane. The Model Falcon 7X is a 19 passenger transport category airplane, powered by three aft mounted Pratt & Whitney PW307A high bypass ratio turbofan engines. Operation of the airplane is accomplished using a fly-by-wire (FBW) primary flight control system. This will be the first application of a FBW primary flight control system in a private/corporate use airplane. The Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 7X flightdeck design incorporates a VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:09 Jul 11, 2006 Jkt 208001 hydrophobic coating to provide adequate pilot compartment view in the presence of precipitation. Primary reliance on such a coating, without windshield wipers, constitutes a novel or unusual design feature for which the applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards. Therefore, special conditions are required that provide the level of safety equivalent to that established by the regulations. Type Certification Basis Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Dassault Aviation must show that the Model Falcon 7X airplane meets the applicable provisions of part 25, as amended by Amendment 25–1 through Amendment 25–108 thereto. If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for the Model Falcon 7X because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under the provisions of § 21.16. In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special conditions, the Model Falcon 7X must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36 and the FAA must issue a finding of regulatory adequacy under § 611 of Public Law 92– 574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’ The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in § 11.19, under § 11.38, and they become part of the type certification basis under § 21.17(a)(2). Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the other model under § 21.101. Novel or Unusual Design Features The Model Falcon 7X will incorporate the following novel or unusual design feature: Hydrophobic windshield coating as the primary means to maintain a clear portion of the windshield, during precipitation conditions, sufficient for both pilots to have a sufficiently extensive view along the flight path. Discussion Section 25.773(b)(1) requires that both pilots of a transport category airplane be provided a means to maintain a sufficiently clear portion of the windshield during precipitation PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 conditions, and that this clear portion of the windshield must have a sufficiently extensive view along the flight path. The regulations require this means to maintain such an area during precipitation in heavy rain at speeds up to 1.5 VSR1. This requirement has existed in principle since 1953 in Part 4b of the Civil Air Regulations (CAR). Section 4b.351(b)(1) of CAR 4b required that ‘‘Means shall be provided for maintaining a sufficient portion of the windshield clear so that both pilots are afforded a sufficiently extensive view along the flight path in all normal flight attitudes of the airplane. Such means shall be designed to function under the following conditions without continuous attention on the part of the crew: (i) In heavy rain at speeds up to 1.6 VS1, flaps retracted.’’ Effective December 26, 2002, Amendment 25–108 changed the speed for effectiveness of the means to maintain an area of clear vision from up to 1.6 VS1 to 1.5 VSR1 to accommodate the redefinition of the reference stall speed from the minimum speed in the stall, VS1, to greater than or equal to the 1-g stall speed, VSR1, as the 1-g stall speed. As noted in the preamble to the final rule for that amendment, the reduced factor of 1.5 on VSR1 is to maintain approximately the same speed as the 1.6 factor on VS1. The requirement that the means to maintain a clear area of forward vision must function at high speeds and high precipitation rates is based on the use of windshield wipers as the means to maintain an adequate area of clear vision in precipitation conditions. The requirement in 14 CFR 121.313(b), and in 14 CFR 125.213(b), to provide ‘‘a windshield wiper or equivalent for each pilot station’’ has remained unchanged since at least 1953. The effectiveness of windshield wipers to maintain an area of clear vision normally degrades as airspeed and precipitation rates increase. It is assumed that because high speeds and high precipitation rates represent limiting conditions for windshield wipers, they will also be effective at lower speeds and precipitation levels. Accordingly, § 25.773(b)(1)(i) does not require maintenance of a clear area of forward vision at lower speeds or lower precipitation rates. A forced airflow blown directly over the windshield has also been used to maintain an area of clear vision in precipitation. The limiting conditions for this technology are comparable to those for windshield wipers. Accordingly, introduction of this technology did not present a need for special conditions to maintain the level E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM 12JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 12, 2006 / Proposed Rules wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS of safety embodied in the existing regulations. Hydrophobic windshield coatings may depend to some degree on airflow directly over the windshield to maintain a clear vision area. The heavy rain and high-speed conditions specified in the current rule do not necessarily represent the limiting conditions for this new technology. For example, airflow over the windshield, which may be necessary to remove moisture from the windshield, may not be adequate to maintain a sufficiently clear area of the windshield in low speed flight or during ground operations. Alternatively, airflow over the windshield may be disturbed during such critical times as the approach to land, where the airplane is at a higher than normal pitch attitude. In these cases, areas of airflow disturbance or separation on the windshield could cause failure to maintain a clear vision area on the windshield. In addition to potentially depending on airflow to function effectively, hydrophobic coatings may also be dependent on water droplet size for effective precipitation removal. For example, precipitation in the form of a light mist may not be sufficient for the coating’s properties to result in maintaining a clear area of vision. In summary, the current regulations identify speed and precipitation rate requirements that represent limiting conditions for windshield wipers and blowers, but not for hydrophobic coatings, so it is necessary to issue special conditions to maintain the level of safety represented by the current regulations. These special conditions provide an appropriate safety standard for the hydrophobic coating technology as the means to maintain a clear area of vision by requiring it to be effective at low speeds and precipitation rates as well as the higher speeds and precipitation rates identified in the current regulation. These are the only new or changed requirements relative to those in § 25.773(b)(1) at Amendment 25–108. Applicability As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the Model Falcon 7X. Should Dassault Aviation apply at a later date for a change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as well. Conclusion This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features on one model VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:09 Jul 11, 2006 Jkt 208001 of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25 Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704. The Proposed Special Conditions Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the following special conditions as part of the type certification basis for Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 7X airplanes. Pilot Compartment View—Hydrophobic Coatings in Lieu of Windshield Wipers The airplane must have a means to maintain a clear portion of the windshield, during precipitation conditions, enough for both pilots to have a sufficiently extensive view along the flight path in normal flight attitudes of the airplane. This means must be designed to function, without continuous attention on the part of the crew, in conditions from light misting precipitation to heavy rain at speeds from fully stopped in still air, to 1.5 VSR1 with lift and drag devices retracted. Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 3, 2006. Kalene C. Yanamura, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E6–10894 Filed 7–11–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2005–22559; Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–076–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain Bombardier Model CL–600–2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes. The existing AD currently requires repetitive inspections for PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 39237 cracks, sealant damage, and corrosion of the main fittings of the main landing gear (MLG), and corrective actions if necessary. This proposed AD would reduce the compliance times for inspecting certain low-utilization airplanes, and provide a terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This proposed AD results from a report of a cracked main fitting of the MLG. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the main fitting of the MLG and consequent failure of the main fitting, which could result in the collapse of the MLG. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 11, 2006. ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on this proposed AD. • DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Contact Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087, Station Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3G9, Canada, for service information identified in this proposed AD. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Beckwith, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE– 171, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–7302; fax (516) 794–5531. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– 2005–22559; Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–076–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the E:\FR\FM\12JYP1.SGM 12JYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 12, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39235-39237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10894]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. NM348; Notice No. 25-06-07-SC]


Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 7X Airplane, 
Windshield Coating in Lieu of Wipers

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for the Dassault 
Aviation Model Falcon 7X airplane. This airplane will have a novel or 
unusual design feature(s) associated with use of a hydrophobic coating, 
rather than windshield wipers, as the means to maintain a clear portion 
of the windshield during precipitation conditions, as required by the 
airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes. The 
applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or 
appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These proposed 
special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the 
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety 
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.

DATES: We must receive your comments by August 28, 2006.

ADDRESSES: You must mail two copies of your comments to: Federal 
Aviation Administration, Transport Airplane Directorate, Attn: Rules 
Docket (ANM-113), Docket No. NM348, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
Washington 98057-3356. You may deliver two copies to the Transport 
Airplane

[[Page 39236]]

Directorate at the above address. You must mark your comments: Docket 
No. NM348 You can inspect comments in the Rules Docket weekdays, except 
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John McConnell, Airplane and Flight 
Crew Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-1365; facsimile (425) 227-
1320, e-mail john.mcconnell@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by 
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments 
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the 
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. We ask 
that you send us two copies of written comments.
    We will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as a 
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel 
concerning these special conditions. You can inspect the docket before 
and after the comment closing date. If you wish to review the docket in 
person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.
    We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing 
date for comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is 
possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change 
these special conditions based on the comments we receive.
    If you want the FAA to acknowledge receipt of your comments on this 
proposal, include with your comments a pre-addressed, stamped postcard 
on which the docket number appears. We will stamp the date on the 
postcard and mail it back to you.

Background

    On June 4, 2002, Dassault Aviation applied for a type certificate 
for its new Model Falcon 7X airplane. The Model Falcon 7X is a 19 
passenger transport category airplane, powered by three aft mounted 
Pratt & Whitney PW307A high bypass ratio turbofan engines. Operation of 
the airplane is accomplished using a fly-by-wire (FBW) primary flight 
control system. This will be the first application of a FBW primary 
flight control system in a private/corporate use airplane.
    The Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 7X flightdeck design 
incorporates a hydrophobic coating to provide adequate pilot 
compartment view in the presence of precipitation. Primary reliance on 
such a coating, without windshield wipers, constitutes a novel or 
unusual design feature for which the applicable airworthiness 
regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards. 
Therefore, special conditions are required that provide the level of 
safety equivalent to that established by the regulations.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Dassault Aviation must show 
that the Model Falcon 7X airplane meets the applicable provisions of 
part 25, as amended by Amendment 25-1 through Amendment 25-108 thereto.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness 
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or 
appropriate safety standards for the Model Falcon 7X because of a novel 
or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under the 
provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special 
conditions, the Model Falcon 7X must comply with the fuel vent and 
exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise 
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36 and the FAA must issue a 
finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec.  611 of Public Law 92-574, 
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec.  11.19, under 
Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type certification basis under 
Sec.  21.17(a)(2).
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which 
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended 
later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar 
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also 
apply to the other model under Sec.  21.101.

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    The Model Falcon 7X will incorporate the following novel or unusual 
design feature:
    Hydrophobic windshield coating as the primary means to maintain a 
clear portion of the windshield, during precipitation conditions, 
sufficient for both pilots to have a sufficiently extensive view along 
the flight path.

Discussion

    Section 25.773(b)(1) requires that both pilots of a transport 
category airplane be provided a means to maintain a sufficiently clear 
portion of the windshield during precipitation conditions, and that 
this clear portion of the windshield must have a sufficiently extensive 
view along the flight path. The regulations require this means to 
maintain such an area during precipitation in heavy rain at speeds up 
to 1.5 VSR1.
    This requirement has existed in principle since 1953 in Part 4b of 
the Civil Air Regulations (CAR). Section 4b.351(b)(1) of CAR 4b 
required that ``Means shall be provided for maintaining a sufficient 
portion of the windshield clear so that both pilots are afforded a 
sufficiently extensive view along the flight path in all normal flight 
attitudes of the airplane. Such means shall be designed to function 
under the following conditions without continuous attention on the part 
of the crew: (i) In heavy rain at speeds up to 1.6 VS1, 
flaps retracted.'' Effective December 26, 2002, Amendment 25-108 
changed the speed for effectiveness of the means to maintain an area of 
clear vision from up to 1.6 VS1 to 1.5 VSR1 to 
accommodate the redefinition of the reference stall speed from the 
minimum speed in the stall, VS1, to greater than or equal to 
the 1-g stall speed, VSR1, as the 1-g stall speed. As noted 
in the preamble to the final rule for that amendment, the reduced 
factor of 1.5 on VSR1 is to maintain approximately the same 
speed as the 1.6 factor on VS1.
    The requirement that the means to maintain a clear area of forward 
vision must function at high speeds and high precipitation rates is 
based on the use of windshield wipers as the means to maintain an 
adequate area of clear vision in precipitation conditions. The 
requirement in 14 CFR 121.313(b), and in 14 CFR 125.213(b), to provide 
``a windshield wiper or equivalent for each pilot station'' has 
remained unchanged since at least 1953.
    The effectiveness of windshield wipers to maintain an area of clear 
vision normally degrades as airspeed and precipitation rates increase. 
It is assumed that because high speeds and high precipitation rates 
represent limiting conditions for windshield wipers, they will also be 
effective at lower speeds and precipitation levels. Accordingly, Sec.  
25.773(b)(1)(i) does not require maintenance of a clear area of forward 
vision at lower speeds or lower precipitation rates.
    A forced airflow blown directly over the windshield has also been 
used to maintain an area of clear vision in precipitation. The limiting 
conditions for this technology are comparable to those for windshield 
wipers. Accordingly, introduction of this technology did not present a 
need for special conditions to maintain the level

[[Page 39237]]

of safety embodied in the existing regulations.
    Hydrophobic windshield coatings may depend to some degree on 
airflow directly over the windshield to maintain a clear vision area. 
The heavy rain and high-speed conditions specified in the current rule 
do not necessarily represent the limiting conditions for this new 
technology. For example, airflow over the windshield, which may be 
necessary to remove moisture from the windshield, may not be adequate 
to maintain a sufficiently clear area of the windshield in low speed 
flight or during ground operations. Alternatively, airflow over the 
windshield may be disturbed during such critical times as the approach 
to land, where the airplane is at a higher than normal pitch attitude. 
In these cases, areas of airflow disturbance or separation on the 
windshield could cause failure to maintain a clear vision area on the 
windshield.
    In addition to potentially depending on airflow to function 
effectively, hydrophobic coatings may also be dependent on water 
droplet size for effective precipitation removal. For example, 
precipitation in the form of a light mist may not be sufficient for the 
coating's properties to result in maintaining a clear area of vision.
    In summary, the current regulations identify speed and 
precipitation rate requirements that represent limiting conditions for 
windshield wipers and blowers, but not for hydrophobic coatings, so it 
is necessary to issue special conditions to maintain the level of 
safety represented by the current regulations.
    These special conditions provide an appropriate safety standard for 
the hydrophobic coating technology as the means to maintain a clear 
area of vision by requiring it to be effective at low speeds and 
precipitation rates as well as the higher speeds and precipitation 
rates identified in the current regulation. These are the only new or 
changed requirements relative to those in Sec.  25.773(b)(1) at 
Amendment 25-108.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the 
Model Falcon 7X. Should Dassault Aviation apply at a later date for a 
change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating 
the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would 
apply to that model as well.

Conclusion

    This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features 
on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.

The Proposed Special Conditions

    Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the 
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis 
for Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 7X airplanes.

Pilot Compartment View--Hydrophobic Coatings in Lieu of Windshield 
Wipers

    The airplane must have a means to maintain a clear portion of the 
windshield, during precipitation conditions, enough for both pilots to 
have a sufficiently extensive view along the flight path in normal 
flight attitudes of the airplane. This means must be designed to 
function, without continuous attention on the part of the crew, in 
conditions from light misting precipitation to heavy rain at speeds 
from fully stopped in still air, to 1.5 VSR1 with lift and 
drag devices retracted.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 3, 2006.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-10894 Filed 7-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.