Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; MULTIHANCE, 39120-39121 [E6-10796]
Download as PDF
39120
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Notices
health care efficiency; and an overview
of the National Healthcare Quality and
Disparities Reports. The final agenda
will be available on AHRQ’s Web site at
https://www.ahrq.gov no later than July
14, 2006.
The meeting will adjourn at 4 p.m.
Dated: July 5, 2006.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 06–6164 Filed 7–7–06; 2:05 pm]
Dated: July 3, 2006.
Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services
Office, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. E6–10774 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
BILLING CODE 4160–90–M
[Docket No. 2005E–0236]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; MULTIHANCE
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
AGENCY:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Disease, Disability, and Injury
Prevention and ControlSpecial
Emphasis Panel: Targeted Evaluation
of the President’s Emergency Plan for
AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Funded
Prevention of Mother-to-Child HIV
Transmission (PMTCT), and Adherence
to Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)
Programs, Contract Solicitation
Numbers (CSN) 2006–N–08428, 2006–
N–08429, and 2006–N–08430
Correction: This notice was published
in the Federal Register on June 9, 2006,
Volume 71, Number 111, page 33456.
The location of the meeting was
changed due to insufficient meeting
space at the Renaissance Concourse
Hotel—Marriott, One Hartsfield Center
Parkway, Atlanta, GA 30354. The
meeting was held at the Hilton Atlanta
Airport, 1031 Virginia Avenue, Atlanta,
Georgia 30354.
Titles: Targeted Evaluation of the
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS
Relief (PEPFAR) Funded Prevention of
Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission
(PMTCT), and Adherence to
Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Programs,
Contract Solicitation Numbers (CSN)
2006–N–08428, 2006–N–08429, and
2006–N–08430.
For Further Information Contact: Amy
L. Sandul, Health Scientist, National
Center for HIV, STD, and Tuberculosis
Prevention, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE.,
MS E–41, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone
404–639–6485.
The Director, Management Analysis
and Services Office, has been delegated
the authority to sign Federal Register
notices pertaining to announcements of
meetings and other committee
management activities, for both CDC
and the Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
MULTIHANCE and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required
by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent that claims that
human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–7), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the human drug
product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the human drug product and continues
until FDA grants permission to market
the product. Although only a portion of
a regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example,
half the testing phase must be
subtracted, as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product MULTIHANCE
(gadobenate dimeglumine).
MULTIHANCE is indicated for
intravenous use in magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) of the central nervous
system in adults to visualize lesions
with abnormal blood brain barrier or
abnormal vascularity of the brain, spine,
and associated tissues. Subsequent to
this approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received a patent term restoration
application for MULTIHANCE (U.S.
Patent No. 4,916,246) from Bracco
International B.V., and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated July 8, 2005, FDA advised
the Patent and Trademark Office that
this human drug product had undergone
a regulatory review period and that the
approval of MULTIHANCE represented
the first permitted commercial
marketing or use of the product.
Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark
Office requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
MULTIHANCE is 3,789 days. Of this
time, 2,482 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review
period, while 1,307 days occurred
during the approval phase. These
periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355) became effective: July 12, 1994.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the date the investigational new
drug application became effective was
on July 12, 1994.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Notices
505(b) of the act: April 27, 2001. FDA
has verified the applicant’s claim that
the new drug applications (NDA) for
Multihance (NDA 21–357 and NDA 21–
358) were initially submitted on April
27, 2001.
3. The date the applications were
approved: November 23, 2004. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claims that NDA
21–357 and NDA 21–358 were approved
on November 23, 2004.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 5 years of patent
term extension.Anyone with knowledge
that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
written or electronic comments and ask
for a redetermination by September 11,
2006. Furthermore, any interested
person may petition FDA for a
determination regarding whether the
applicant for extension acted with due
diligence during the regulatory review
period by January 8, 2007. To meet its
burden, the petition must contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1,
98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.)
Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document.
Comments and petitions may be seen
in the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Dated: June 13, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6–10796 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Toxicology Program (NTP),
Liaison and Scientific Review Office;
Meeting of the Scientific Advisory
Committee on Alternative
Toxicological Methods (SACATM)
National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences
(NIEHS), National Institutes of Health
(NIH), HHS.
AGENCY:
Meeting announcement and
request for comment.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given of a teleconference
meeting of the SACATM on August 3,
2006. The teleconference is scheduled
from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. and is open to the
public. At the teleconference, SACATM
will discuss the conclusions of a peer
review panel that met on May 23, 2006
to evaluate the validation status of the
in vitro 3T3 and normal human
keratinocyte (NHK) neutral red uptake
(NRU) basal cytotoxicity test methods
(see ‘‘Background’’ for more detail). The
public is invited to participate in the
teleconference and will be provided
with an opportunity to make oral
comments during the public comment
period. Participation is limited only by
the number of phone lines available.
In order to facilitate planning for
this meeting, persons wishing to make
an oral presentation are asked to notify
Dr. Kristina Thayer via phone or e-mail
by July 25, 2006, (see ADDRESSES below).
Please note that a request for written
comments on the peer review report is
being announced in a separate Federal
Register notice (available at https://
ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/frn).
DATES:
Correspondence should be
directed to Dr. Kristina Thayer,
Executive Secretary for SACATM (NTP
Liaison and Scientific Review Office,
NIEHS, P.O. Box 12233, MD A3–01,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709;
telephone: 919–541–5021, fax: 919–
541–0295; or e-mail:
thayer@niehs.nih.gov). Persons needing
special assistance to participate should
contact 919–541–2475 voice, 919–541–
4644 TTY (text telephone), through the
Federal TTY Relay System at 800–877–
8339, or by e-mail to
niehsoeeo@niehs.nih.gov. Requests
should be made at least 7 days in
advance of the event.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39121
Background
The National Toxicology Program
(NTP) Interagency Center for the
Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological
Methods (NICEATM), in collaboration
with the Interagency Coordinating
Committee on the Validation of
Alternative Methods (ICCVAM),
organized an independent, scientific
peer review meeting on May 23, 2006,
to evaluate the validation status of the
in vitro 3T3 and normal human
keratinocyte (NHK) neutral red uptake
(NRU) basal cytotoxicity test methods.
These two in vitro cytotoxicity test
methods are proposed as adjuncts (for
the purpose of determining the starting
dose) to in vivo acute oral toxicity tests.
The peer review panel prepared a report
that contains (1) a summary of the peer
review evaluation and (2) the peer
review panel’s conclusions on the draft
ICCVAM test method recommendations
regarding the proposed usefulness,
limitations, and validation status of the
3T3 and NHK cytotoxicity test methods.
The availability of the report, entitled
Peer Review Panel Evaluation of the Use
of In Vitro Basal Cytotoxicity Test
Methods for Estimating Starting Doses
for Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity
Testing, and a request for written public
comments on the peer review panel’s
conclusions regarding the draft ICCVAM
test method recommendations are
announced in a separate Federal
Register notice (available at https://
ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/frn). Copies of the
report may be obtained on the ICCVAM/
NICEATM Web site at https://
iccvam.niehs.nih.gov or by contacting
the Dr. Kristina Thayer (see ADDRESSES
above).
At the teleconference, SACATM will
discuss peer review panel’s report,
focusing on the panel’s conclusions
regarding the draft ICCVAM
recommendations for the proposed use
of these test methods, draft test method
protocols, draft performance standards,
and draft recommended future studies.
ICCVAM will consider the peer review
report, SACATM comments, and any
written public comments received on
that report as it prepares final ICCVAM
recommendations for the two in vitro
basal cytotoxicity test methods. An
ICCVAM test method evaluation report,
which will include the final ICCVAM
recommendations, will be forwarded to
the appropriate federal agencies for their
consideration and made available to the
public.
Request for Comments
Public input at the SACATM
teleconference is invited and time is set
aside for the presentation of public
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39120-39121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10796]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2005E-0236]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; MULTIHANCE
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for MULTIHANCE and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent that claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD-7), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the human drug product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the
initial submission of an application to market the human drug product
and continues until FDA grants permission to market the product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted, as well as any time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory
review period for a human drug product will include all of the testing
phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product
MULTIHANCE (gadobenate dimeglumine). MULTIHANCE is indicated for
intravenous use in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the central
nervous system in adults to visualize lesions with abnormal blood brain
barrier or abnormal vascularity of the brain, spine, and associated
tissues. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office
received a patent term restoration application for MULTIHANCE (U.S.
Patent No. 4,916,246) from Bracco International B.V., and the Patent
and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this
patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated
July 8, 2005, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this
human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that
the approval of MULTIHANCE represented the first permitted commercial
marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark
Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review
period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
MULTIHANCE is 3,789 days. Of this time, 2,482 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 1,307 days
occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived
from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355) became effective: July
12, 1994. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the date the
investigational new drug application became effective was on July 12,
1994.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section
[[Page 39121]]
505(b) of the act: April 27, 2001. FDA has verified the applicant's
claim that the new drug applications (NDA) for Multihance (NDA 21-357
and NDA 21-358) were initially submitted on April 27, 2001.
3. The date the applications were approved: November 23, 2004. FDA
has verified the applicant's claims that NDA 21-357 and NDA 21-358 were
approved on November 23, 2004.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 5 years of
patent term extension.Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as
published are incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by September 11, 2006. Furthermore, any interested
person may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the
applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory
review period by January 8, 2007. To meet its burden, the petition must
contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept.
857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should
be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document.
Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: June 13, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6-10796 Filed 7-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S