Pipeline Safety: Grant of Waiver; Alliance Pipeline L.P., 39145-39148 [06-6106]
Download as PDF
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Notices
reassessed according to subpart O and
the American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME) standard B31.8S
requirements. Each anomaly not
repaired must have a corrosion growth
rate and ILI tool tolerance assigned to it
per the Gas Integrity Management
Program (IMP) to determine the
maximum re-inspection interval.
b. Rockies Express must confirm the
remaining strength (R–STRENG)
effective area method, R–STRENG—
0.85dL, and ASME standard B31G
assessment methods are valid for their
pipe diameter, wall thickness, grade,
operating pressure, operating stress
level, and operating temperature. If it is
not valid, Rockies Express must confirm
a valid evaluation method to PHMSA.
Until confirmation of the previously
mentioned anomaly assessment
calculations has been performed,
Rockies Express must use the most
conservative of the calculations for
anomaly evaluation.
c. Dents must be evaluated and
repaired per § 192.309(b)(ii) and
§ 192.933(d)(l)(ii).
44. Preliminary Criteria Reporting: A
preliminary report describing the
results, completion dates and status of
the supplementary requirements must
be completed for the western and
eastern segments of the pipeline and
submitted to PHMSA Headquarters and
the appropriate PHMSA regional office
prior to commencing construction of
each segment.
45. Criteria Completion Reporting: A
report describing results, completion
dates and status of the outstanding
supplementary requirements must be
submitted to PHMSA Headquarters and
the appropriate regional office within
180 days after completion of the western
pipeline segment. A similar report must
be completed within 180 days of
completion of the eastern segment and
submitted to PHMSA Headquarters and
the appropriate PHMSA regional office.
A follow-up report must be submitted
for the western and eastern segments
after the baseline ILI run has been
performed with assessment and
integration of the results. A final report
must be submitted upon completion of
the second ILI run for the western and
eastern segments. These reports must be
submitted to PHMSA Headquarters and
the appropriate PHMSA regional office.
46. Potential Impact Radius
Calculation Updates: If the pipeline
operating pressures and gas quality are
determined to be outside the parameters
of the C–FER Study, a new study with
the uprated parameters must be
incorporated into the IMP.
If at anytime PHMSA determines the
effect of the waiver is inconsistent with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
pipeline safety, PHMSA will revoke the
waiver at its sole discretion.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60118 (c) and 49 CFR
1.53.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 5, 2006.
Theodore L. Willke,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline
Safety.
[FR Doc. 06–6105 Filed 7–6–06; 9:10 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2006–23387; Notice 2]
Pipeline Safety: Grant of Waiver;
Alliance Pipeline L.P.
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA); DOT.
ACTION: Grant of Waiver.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: PHMSA is granting Alliance
Pipeline L.P. (APL) a waiver of
compliance from certain PHMSA
regulations for the United States portion
of its pipeline system. This waiver
increases the maximum allowable
operating pressure (MAOP) for its
pipeline. It also increases the design
factor for its compressor station piping,
grants relief from the hydrostatic testing
requirements for its compressor station
piping, and grants relief from equipment
requirements for pressure relieving and
limiting stations.
Before granting the waiver, PHMSA
performed a thorough technical review
of APL’s application for waiver and
supporting documents. PHMSA
requested and received supplementary
information pertaining to numerous
technical aspects of APL’s design,
engineering, operations, and
maintenance practices. PHMSA also
sought comments from the public and
received positive feedback from the
impacted States along the pipeline and
the Technical Pipeline Safety Standards
Committee.
The waiver is subject to and
conditional upon supplemental safety
criteria set forth in this notice. The
supplemental safety criteria address the
life cycle management of the subject
pipeline and require the operator to
adhere to maintenance, inspection,
monitoring, control, and reporting
standards exceeding existing regulatory
requirements.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The United States portion of APL’s
system was commissioned in 2000 and
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39145
consists of approximately 888 miles of
transmission pipeline in North Dakota,
Minnesota, Iowa, and Illinois. APL
transports natural gas from the
Canadian/United States border near
Minot, North Dakota to the Aux Sable
Delivery Meter Station near Chicago,
Illinois where natural gas liquids such
as ethane, butane, propane, and other
liquids are separated out from the gas
stream. The natural gas is then
transported about 13 miles to various
metering facilities. The APL system
includes seven compressor stations.
The APL system is constructed from
36-inch, Grade X70 high pressure steel
pipe with three wall thicknesses: 0.622
inches, 0.746 inches, and 0.895 inches.
The pipelines are mechanically welded,
coated with multi-layered, fusionbonded, non-shielding epoxy, and are
protected by an impressed current
cathodic protection system.
During construction of the APL
pipeline, all girth welds were subjected
to volumetric inspection to verify weld
quality. Further, in 2005, APL inspected
the pipeline using a high-resolution
Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) in-line
inspection (ILI) tool. The operator used
this technology to look for anomalies
that could impact the integrity and
safety of the pipeline. No anomalies
were found.
APL’s Waiver Requests
APL requests a waiver of compliance
from the following regulatory
requirements:
49 CFR 192.111—Design Factor (F) for
Steel Pipe;
49 CFR 192.201—Required Capacity of
Pressure Relieving and Limiting
Stations;
49 CFR 192.505—Strength Test
Requirements for Steel Pipeline to
Operate at a Hoop Stress of 30
percent or more of SMYS; and
49 CFR 192.619—Maximum Allowable
Operating Pressure: Steel or Plastic
Pipelines.
The waiver request is for
approximately 874.7 miles of 36-inch
diameter pipe located in the United
States between the Canadian border at
Milepost 0.0 and the inlet of Aux Sable
Deliver Meter Station near Chicago,
Illinois at Milepost 874.7. In the
document, we refer to this segment as
the area of waiver.
The waiver application involves six
specific requests:
(1) Increase the stress level from 72
percent of SMYS, corresponding to 1740
psig, to 80 percent of SMYS,
corresponding to 1935.1 psig from the
Canadian border at Milepost 0.0 to the
inlet of the Aux Sable Delivery Meter
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
39146
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Notices
Station near Chicago, Illinois, at mile
post 874.7. This segment of the APL
pipeline, including the compressor
stations, is referred to as the waiver
area.
(2) Provide relief from regulations
which require that compressor station
piping be subjected to Class 3 testing
requirements by increasing the stress
level in the compressor station piping
from 50 percent of SMYS,
corresponding to 1814 psig, to 54
percent of SMYS, corresponding to
1961.4 psig. This request results in
increasing the design factor for the
station piping from 0.50 to 0.54.
(3) Provide relief from regulations
requiring all Class 1 locations to comply
with strength test factor requirements.
The minimum test pressure obtained in
pipelines located in Class 1 locations
was 2229 psig. This resulted in a 1.15
test factor for operation at 1935.1 psig
(80 percent of SMYS).
(4) Provide relief from regulations
requiring all Class 2 locations to comply
with strength test factor and the design
factor requirements. Two Class 2
locations totaling 966 linear feet (LF) are
affected by this request and include a
379 LF section located downstream of
mile post 764.6 and a 587 LF section
located downstream of mile post 819.8.
These two Class 2 locations will
increase the design factor to 80 percent
of SMYS and operate up to the proposed
MAOP of 1935.1 psig.
(5) Allow use of the American Society
of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
standard B31.8 requirement to
hydrostatically test compressor station
piping to 1.4 times the MAOP, in lieu
of the regulatory requirements to test to
1.5 times the MAOP. As a result, piping
in one of APL’s compressor stations will
be hydrostatically re-tested; however,
the remaining six stations will not
require additional station piping
hydrostatic tests.
(6) Relief from regulations governing
compressor station design MAOP and
overpressure protection set points, and
be permitted to operate the system at the
compressor stations at less than or equal
to 1961.4 psig. This corresponds to a
compressor station MAOP of 54 percent
SMYS (81.07 percent of SMYS of the
mainline pipe), which is 26.3 psig above
the proposed 1935.1 psig (80 percent of
SMYS operating pressure). The
overpressure protection set point
exceeds the regulatory requirement of
75 percent of SMYS, but is less than 110
percent of the mainline MAOP of 1935.1
psig.
Pipeline System Analysis
APL established feasibility criteria to
assess the safety and reliability of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
pipeline to operate at stress levels up to
80 percent of SMYS. These criteria
include:
• Developing operational
commitments that would improve safety
for any person residing, working, or
vacationing near the United States
portion of its pipeline, including
approximately 15 miles of pipeline
located in high consequence areas.
• Performing in-depth assessments of
its existing pipeline equipment to
ensure there is no impact on the
reliability of the pipeline. APL
performed reviews to verify that the
equipment is capable of sustaining
operations at increased pressures.
• Providing environmental benefits
versus other delivery alternatives for the
additional gas being provided.
• Creating economic benefits to
natural gas suppliers and shippers.
• Creating incremental economic
benefits to end use customers.
APL also performed technical reviews
and assessments of its pipeline and
compressor stations facilities that
currently operate at 72 percent of SMYS
and in the future will operate at 80
percent of SMYS. APL compared the
threats associated with a pipeline
operating at 72 percent of SMYS with
the threats associated with a pipeline
operating at 80 percent of SMYS. APL
analyzed the following nine threats: (1)
Excavation damage; (2) external
corrosion; (3) internal corrosion; (4)
stress corrosion cracking; (5) pipe
manufacturing; (6) construction; (7)
equipment; (8) weather and outside
factors; and (9) incorrect operations.
In response to these technical reviews
and assessments, APL proposed several
programs to mitigate the increased risks
to its pipeline. APL will implement
preventive measures as part of its
Integrity Management Program (IMP) to
mitigate the threats imposed by
excavation damage. APL also will
develop an external corrosion mitigation
plan to address the threat of external
corrosion, and APL will rely on the
integrity reassessment intervals of IMP
to mitigate the threat of internal
corrosion. To manage the threat of stress
corrosion cracking, APL will implement
magnetic particle examinations at any
location(s) along its pipeline where
damage to its fusion bond epoxy (FBE)
coating is detected. APL also will
perform external corrosion direct
assessment (ECDA) in the Class 2 areas
prior to increasing pressure with the
exception of the pipeline segment
located under the Mississippi River
where ECDA is impractical.
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Grant of Waiver
On March 22, 2006, PHMSA
published its notice of intent to consider
the waiver and solicited comments from
the public (71 FR 14572). We received
two comments: One concerning ‘‘open’’
communications, and the other
supporting the waiver.
• One commenter indicated that
although APL has proven to be a good
neighbor, he expressed reservations
about APL’s openness in
communications.
• The other commenter supported the
waiver because the benefits of granting
the waiver will at least include (1) an
increase in available natural gas
pipeline capacity on APL’s pipeline,
thereby increasing the amount of natural
gas that can be delivered to customer
markets throughout the United States;
(2) an improvement in fuel efficiency
through a reduction in required fuel gas,
which will lead to fuel cost savings; and
(3) a reduction in capital expenditures
by APL, particularly for expanding its
facilities and building new pipelines.
PHMSA reviewed the documentation
submitted by APL prior to proposing
action on the waiver petition. PHMSA
also requested additional information as
a part of its technical review. APL
responded to information requests from
PHMSA and other stakeholders to
clarify technical details of the petition.
APL’s responses to our supplementary
questions are available in docket
PHMSA–2006–23387 at https://
dms.dot.gov.
PHMSA evaluated APL’s studies that
technically justified the waiver petition.
PHMSA also recognized the superior
materials used to construct the APL
system and the full-scale testing
sponsored by APL to verify the fracture
control characteristics of the pipe
material. APL proposed operational
commitments, when combined with the
PHMSA required safety criteria
discussed later in this document,
enhance the safety of the pipeline
system and offset the risk of increasing
the operating stress level from 72
percent to 80 percent of SMYS. APL’s
commitments and PHMSA’s
supplementary safety criteria require the
APL system to be more rigorously
monitored than other pipelines not
covered by a similar waiver.
PHMSA considered APL’s waiver
request and whether its proposal will
yield an equivalent or greater degree of
safety than that currently provided by
the pipeline safety regulations. PHMSA
also reviewed additional information
provided by APL in response to a
PHMSA information request. After
reviewing all submitted information,
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Notices
PHMSA also developed safety criteria
that APL must comply with as a
condition of the waiver. The criteria,
listed below, together with the programs
proposed by APL in the waiver petition,
would be the basis for the life-cycle
management of the APL pipeline subject
to the waiver.
PHMSA received positive comments
and conducted a thorough technical
review of APL’s application for waiver,
supporting documents, and comments
received. In addition, PHMSA sought
comments and received positive
feedback from the impacted States along
the pipeline and the Technical Pipeline
Safety Standards Committee. PHMSA
hereby grants APL’s waiver request
provided APL, or a successor operator,
complies with the following
supplemental safety criteria:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Pipe and Material Quality
1. Fracture Control Plan: APL must
implement an overall fracture control
plan to address fracture initiation,
propagation and Charpy arrest (stop)
values. The fracture initiation,
propagation and arrest plan must
account for the entire range of
temperatures, pressures and gas
compositions that the pipeline will
experience.
2. Fittings: All pressure rated fittings
and components (including flanges,
valves, gaskets, pressure vessels and
compressors) must be rated for a
pressure commensurate with the MAOP
and class location of the pipeline.
Designed fittings (including tees,
elbows, and caps) must have the same
design factors as the adjacent pipe.
3. Station Design Factor: APL may use
a design factor not exceeding 0.54 for
existing compressor and meter stations.
New compressor and meter stations
must be designed using a design factor
of 0.50 per § 192.111.
4. Temperature Control: The
compressor station discharge
temperature must be limited to 120°
Fahrenheit or a temperature below the
maximum long-term operating
temperature for the pipe coating.
5. Overpressure Protection: Mainline
pipeline overpressure protection must
be limited to a maximum of 104 percent
of MAOP.
Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition (SCADA)
6. SCADA System: APL must use a
SCADA system to provide remote
monitoring and control of the entire
pipeline system.
7. Mainline Valve Control: Mainline
valves that reside on either side of
pipeline segment containing a High
Consequence Area (HCA) where
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
personnel response time to the valve
exceeds one (1) hour must be remotely
controlled by the SCADA system. The
SCADA system must be capable of
opening and closing the valve and
monitoring the valve position, upstream
pressure and downstream pressure. As
an alternative to remote control of
mainline valves, APL may implement a
leak detection system.
8. SCADA Set Point Review: APL
must implement a detailed procedure to
establish and maintain accurate SCADA
set points to ensure the pipeline is
operating within acceptable design
limits at all times.
Operations and Maintenance
9. Leak Reporting: APL must notify
the PHMSA Central Region Office as
soon as practicable of any nonreportable leaks occurring on the
pipeline covered by the waiver.
10. Annual Reporting: Annually,
following approval of the waiver, APL
must report the following:
• The results of any ILI or direct
assessments performed within the
waiver area during the previous year.
• Any new integrity threats identified
within the waiver area during the
previous year.
• Any encroachment in the waiver
area, including the number of new
residences or public gathering areas.
• Any reportable incidents within the
waiver area that occurred during the
previous year.
• Any leaks on the pipeline in the
waiver area that occurred during the
previous year.
• A list of all repairs on the pipeline
in the waiver area made during the
previous year.
• On-going damage prevention
initiatives on the pipeline in the waiver
area and a discussion of their success.
• Any company mergers,
acquisitions, transfers of assets, or other
events affecting the regulatory
responsibility of the company operating
the pipeline to which this waiver
applies.
11. Pipeline Inspection: The pipeline
must be capable of passing ILI. All
headers and other segments covered
under the waiver that do not allow the
passage of an internal inspection device
must have a corrosion mitigation plan.
12. Gas Quality Monitoring and
Control: APL’s gas quality monitoring
and mitigation program must have the
ability to restrict constituents that
promote internal corrosion to not
exceed the following limits:
• H2S (4 grains maximum);
• CO2 (3 percent maximum);
• H2O (less than or equal to 7 pounds
per million standard cubic feet and no
free water); and
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39147
• Other deleterious constituents that
may impact the integrity of the pipeline
must be minimized.
13. Gas Quality Control Equipment:
Filters/separators must be installed at
locations where needed to comply with
the above gas quality requirements and
meet APL’s gas tariff.
14. Control of Liquids: Gas quality
monitoring equipment must be installed
to permit the operator to manage the
introduction of contaminants and free
liquids into the pipeline.
15. Corrosion Mitigation Plan: APL
must submit an external corrosion
mitigation plan as summarized in its
waiver petition, Appendix N.
16. Initial Close Interval Survey: An
initial baseline close interval survey
(CIS) must be completed in concert with
the baseline ILI indicated in criteria 24
and as indicated in the operational
commitments of APL’s waiver petition.
17. Verification of Cathodic
Protection: A CIS must be performed in
concert with an ILI in accordance with
subpart O reassessment intervals for all
HCA pipeline mileage. If any annual test
point readings fall below subpart I
requirements, remediation must be
performed and must include a CIS on
either side of the affected test point.
18. Pipeline Markers: APL must
employ line-of-sight marking on the
pipeline in the waiver area except in
agricultural areas subject to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission permits
or environmental permits and local
restrictions.
19. Pipeline Patrolling: APL must
patrol the pipeline at least monthly to
inspect for excavation activities, ground
movement, wash-outs, leakage, and/or
other activities and conditions affecting
the safe operation of the pipeline.
20. Monitoring of Ground Movement:
An effective monitoring/mitigation plan
must be in place to monitor for and
mitigate issues of unstable soil and
ground movement.
21. Uprating Plan Review and
Approval: The uprating
(commissioning) plan must be
submitted to the PHMSA Central Region
Office for review and approval before
increasing the pressure on the pipeline.
22. Preliminary Criteria Reporting: A
preliminary report describing the
results, completion dates and status of
actions required under supplemental
safety criteria contained herein must be
completed and submitted to PHMSA
Headquarters and PHMSA Central
Region Office prior to increasing the
pressure on the pipeline system.
23. Criteria Completion Reporting: A
report describing results, completion
dates and status of the outstanding
criteria must be submitted to PHMSA
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
39148
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Headquarters and PHMSA Central
Region Office within 180 days after
completion of uprating.
A final report must be submitted to
PHMSA Headquarters and PHMSA
Central Regional Office upon
completion of the second ILI run for the
pipeline.
Integrity Management
24. Initial ILI: A baseline ILI must be
performed in association with this
waiver on the pipeline using a highresolution inline inspection technology
capable of detecting metal loss and
mechanical damage. The results of the
baseline ILI must be integrated with the
baseline CIS as described in criteria
number 16.
25. Future ILI: A second high
resolution MFL inspection must be
performed on the pipe subject to the
waiver following the baseline ILI and be
completed within the first reassessment
interval required by subpart O,
regardless of HCA classification. Future
ILI must be performed on a frequency
consistent with subpart O for the entire
pipeline covered by this waiver.
26. Direct Assessment Plan: Headers,
mainline valve bypasses, and other
sections covered by this waiver that
cannot accommodate ILI tools must be
part of a Direct Assessment plan or
other acceptable integrity monitoring
method.
27. Damage Prevention Program:
Common Ground Alliance’s damage
prevention best practices must be
incorporated into APL’s damage
prevention program.
28. Anomaly Evaluation and Repair:
Anomaly evaluations and repairs must
be performed based upon the following:
• For purposes of this criterion, the
Failure Pressure Ratio (FPR) is an
indication of the pipeline’s remaining
strength from an anomaly and is equal
to the predicted failure pressure divided
by the MAOP.
• Anomaly Response Time.
Æ Any anomaly with a FPR equal to
or less than 1.1 must be treated as an
‘‘immediate repair’’ per subpart O.
Æ Any anomaly with a FPR equal to
or less than 1.25 must be remediated
within 12 months per subpart O.
Æ Any anomaly with an FPR greater
than 1.25 must have a remediation
schedule per subpart O.
• Anomaly Repair Criteria.
Æ Segments operating at MAOP equal
to 80 percent stress level—Any anomaly
evaluated and found to have an FPR
equal to or less than 1.25 must be
repaired.
Æ Segments operating at MAOP equal
to 66 percent stress level—Any anomaly
evaluated and found to have an FPR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
equal to or less than 1.50 must be
repaired.
Æ Segments operating at MAOP equal
to 56 percent stress level—Any anomaly
evaluated and found to have an FPR
equal to or less than 1.80 must be
repaired.
a. All other pipe segments with
anomalies that are not repaired must be
reassessed according to subpart O and
ASME Standard B31.8S requirements.
Each anomaly not repaired must have a
corrosion growth rate and an ILI
tolerance assigned to it per the Gas IMP
to determine the maximum reinspection interval.
b. APL must confirm that the
remaining strength (R-STRENG)
effective area method, RSTRENG¥0.85dL, and B31G assessment
methods are valid for the pipe diameter,
wall thickness, grade, operating
pressure, operating stress level, and
operating temperature covered under
this waiver. If the assessment methods
are not valid, APL must submit a valid
method to PHMSA Central Region
Office. Until confirmation of the
previously mentioned anomaly
assessment calculations have been
performed, APL must use the most
conservative of the calculations for
anomaly evaluation.
c. Dents must be evaluated and
repaired in accordance with
§§ 192.309(b)(ii) and 192.933(d)(l)(ii).
29. Potential Impact Radius
Calculation Updates: If the pipeline
operating pressures and gas quality are
determined to be outside the parameters
of the C–FER Study, a new study with
the updated parameters must be
incorporated into the IMP.
If at anytime PHMSA determines the
effect of the waiver is inconsistent with
pipeline safety, PHMSA will revoke the
waiver at its sole discretion.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60118 (c) and 49 CFR
1.53.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 5, 2006.
Theodore L. Willke,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline
Safety.
[FR Doc. 06–6106 Filed 7–6–06; 9:10 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2006–23448; Notice 2]
Pipeline Safety: Grant of Waiver;
Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA); DOT.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Grant of waiver.
SUMMARY: PHMSA is granting Maritimes
& Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. (M&N) a
waiver of compliance from certain
PHMSA regulations for the United
States portion of its pipeline system.
This waiver increases the maximum
allowable operating pressure (MAOP)
for the pipeline. This waiver decision
also authorizes M&N to increase the
design factor for its compressor station
piping, grants relief from the strength
testing requirements for M&N’s
compressor station piping, grants relief
in establishing the MAOP of pipelines
operating above prescribed hoop
stresses, grants relief from the capacity
requirements of pressure limiting
stations, and authorizes M&N to
maintain the pressure rating of portions
of the waiver area subject to a change in
class location.
Before granting the waiver, PHMSA
performed a thorough technical review
of M&N’s application and supporting
documents. PHMSA requested and
received supplementary information on
numerous technical aspects of M&N’s
design, engineering, operations, and
maintenance practices. The materials
are available in docket PHMSA–2006–
23448 at https://dms.dot.gov. PHMSA
also sought comments from the public
and received positive feedback from
States along the pipeline and the
Technical Pipeline Safety Standards
Committee.
The waiver is subject to and
conditional upon supplemental safety
criteria set forth in this notice. The
supplemental safety criteria address the
life-cycle management of the subject
pipeline and require M&N to adhere to
maintenance, inspection, monitoring,
control, and reporting standards
exceeding existing regulatory
requirements.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
M&N requested a waiver of
compliance for the United States
portion of its pipeline system in Class
1, 2, and 3 locations to operate at stress
levels up to 80 percent, 67 percent, and
56 percent, respectively, of the
pipeline’s specified minimum yield
strength (SMYS). The current MAOP of
the pipeline system is 1,440 pounds per
square inch gauge (psig) and the waiver
would increase it to 1,600 psig.
Specifically, M&N requests a waiver of
compliance from the following
regulatory requirements:
• 49 CFR 192.111—Design factor (F)
for steel pipe;
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39145-39148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6106]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA-2006-23387; Notice 2]
Pipeline Safety: Grant of Waiver; Alliance Pipeline L.P.
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA);
DOT.
ACTION: Grant of Waiver.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: PHMSA is granting Alliance Pipeline L.P. (APL) a waiver of
compliance from certain PHMSA regulations for the United States portion
of its pipeline system. This waiver increases the maximum allowable
operating pressure (MAOP) for its pipeline. It also increases the
design factor for its compressor station piping, grants relief from the
hydrostatic testing requirements for its compressor station piping, and
grants relief from equipment requirements for pressure relieving and
limiting stations.
Before granting the waiver, PHMSA performed a thorough technical
review of APL's application for waiver and supporting documents. PHMSA
requested and received supplementary information pertaining to numerous
technical aspects of APL's design, engineering, operations, and
maintenance practices. PHMSA also sought comments from the public and
received positive feedback from the impacted States along the pipeline
and the Technical Pipeline Safety Standards Committee.
The waiver is subject to and conditional upon supplemental safety
criteria set forth in this notice. The supplemental safety criteria
address the life cycle management of the subject pipeline and require
the operator to adhere to maintenance, inspection, monitoring, control,
and reporting standards exceeding existing regulatory requirements.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The United States portion of APL's system was commissioned in 2000
and consists of approximately 888 miles of transmission pipeline in
North Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, and Illinois. APL transports natural gas
from the Canadian/United States border near Minot, North Dakota to the
Aux Sable Delivery Meter Station near Chicago, Illinois where natural
gas liquids such as ethane, butane, propane, and other liquids are
separated out from the gas stream. The natural gas is then transported
about 13 miles to various metering facilities. The APL system includes
seven compressor stations.
The APL system is constructed from 36-inch, Grade X70 high pressure
steel pipe with three wall thicknesses: 0.622 inches, 0.746 inches, and
0.895 inches. The pipelines are mechanically welded, coated with multi-
layered, fusion-bonded, non-shielding epoxy, and are protected by an
impressed current cathodic protection system.
During construction of the APL pipeline, all girth welds were
subjected to volumetric inspection to verify weld quality. Further, in
2005, APL inspected the pipeline using a high-resolution Magnetic Flux
Leakage (MFL) in-line inspection (ILI) tool. The operator used this
technology to look for anomalies that could impact the integrity and
safety of the pipeline. No anomalies were found.
APL's Waiver Requests
APL requests a waiver of compliance from the following regulatory
requirements:
49 CFR 192.111--Design Factor (F) for Steel Pipe;
49 CFR 192.201--Required Capacity of Pressure Relieving and Limiting
Stations;
49 CFR 192.505--Strength Test Requirements for Steel Pipeline to
Operate at a Hoop Stress of 30 percent or more of SMYS; and
49 CFR 192.619--Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure: Steel or Plastic
Pipelines.
The waiver request is for approximately 874.7 miles of 36-inch
diameter pipe located in the United States between the Canadian border
at Milepost 0.0 and the inlet of Aux Sable Deliver Meter Station near
Chicago, Illinois at Milepost 874.7. In the document, we refer to this
segment as the area of waiver.
The waiver application involves six specific requests:
(1) Increase the stress level from 72 percent of SMYS,
corresponding to 1740 psig, to 80 percent of SMYS, corresponding to
1935.1 psig from the Canadian border at Milepost 0.0 to the inlet of
the Aux Sable Delivery Meter
[[Page 39146]]
Station near Chicago, Illinois, at mile post 874.7. This segment of the
APL pipeline, including the compressor stations, is referred to as the
waiver area.
(2) Provide relief from regulations which require that compressor
station piping be subjected to Class 3 testing requirements by
increasing the stress level in the compressor station piping from 50
percent of SMYS, corresponding to 1814 psig, to 54 percent of SMYS,
corresponding to 1961.4 psig. This request results in increasing the
design factor for the station piping from 0.50 to 0.54.
(3) Provide relief from regulations requiring all Class 1 locations
to comply with strength test factor requirements. The minimum test
pressure obtained in pipelines located in Class 1 locations was 2229
psig. This resulted in a 1.15 test factor for operation at 1935.1 psig
(80 percent of SMYS).
(4) Provide relief from regulations requiring all Class 2 locations
to comply with strength test factor and the design factor requirements.
Two Class 2 locations totaling 966 linear feet (LF) are affected by
this request and include a 379 LF section located downstream of mile
post 764.6 and a 587 LF section located downstream of mile post 819.8.
These two Class 2 locations will increase the design factor to 80
percent of SMYS and operate up to the proposed MAOP of 1935.1 psig.
(5) Allow use of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers
(ASME) standard B31.8 requirement to hydrostatically test compressor
station piping to 1.4 times the MAOP, in lieu of the regulatory
requirements to test to 1.5 times the MAOP. As a result, piping in one
of APL's compressor stations will be hydrostatically re-tested;
however, the remaining six stations will not require additional station
piping hydrostatic tests.
(6) Relief from regulations governing compressor station design
MAOP and overpressure protection set points, and be permitted to
operate the system at the compressor stations at less than or equal to
1961.4 psig. This corresponds to a compressor station MAOP of 54
percent SMYS (81.07 percent of SMYS of the mainline pipe), which is
26.3 psig above the proposed 1935.1 psig (80 percent of SMYS operating
pressure). The overpressure protection set point exceeds the regulatory
requirement of 75 percent of SMYS, but is less than 110 percent of the
mainline MAOP of 1935.1 psig.
Pipeline System Analysis
APL established feasibility criteria to assess the safety and
reliability of the pipeline to operate at stress levels up to 80
percent of SMYS. These criteria include:
Developing operational commitments that would improve
safety for any person residing, working, or vacationing near the United
States portion of its pipeline, including approximately 15 miles of
pipeline located in high consequence areas.
Performing in-depth assessments of its existing pipeline
equipment to ensure there is no impact on the reliability of the
pipeline. APL performed reviews to verify that the equipment is capable
of sustaining operations at increased pressures.
Providing environmental benefits versus other delivery
alternatives for the additional gas being provided.
Creating economic benefits to natural gas suppliers and
shippers.
Creating incremental economic benefits to end use
customers.
APL also performed technical reviews and assessments of its
pipeline and compressor stations facilities that currently operate at
72 percent of SMYS and in the future will operate at 80 percent of
SMYS. APL compared the threats associated with a pipeline operating at
72 percent of SMYS with the threats associated with a pipeline
operating at 80 percent of SMYS. APL analyzed the following nine
threats: (1) Excavation damage; (2) external corrosion; (3) internal
corrosion; (4) stress corrosion cracking; (5) pipe manufacturing; (6)
construction; (7) equipment; (8) weather and outside factors; and (9)
incorrect operations.
In response to these technical reviews and assessments, APL
proposed several programs to mitigate the increased risks to its
pipeline. APL will implement preventive measures as part of its
Integrity Management Program (IMP) to mitigate the threats imposed by
excavation damage. APL also will develop an external corrosion
mitigation plan to address the threat of external corrosion, and APL
will rely on the integrity reassessment intervals of IMP to mitigate
the threat of internal corrosion. To manage the threat of stress
corrosion cracking, APL will implement magnetic particle examinations
at any location(s) along its pipeline where damage to its fusion bond
epoxy (FBE) coating is detected. APL also will perform external
corrosion direct assessment (ECDA) in the Class 2 areas prior to
increasing pressure with the exception of the pipeline segment located
under the Mississippi River where ECDA is impractical.
Grant of Waiver
On March 22, 2006, PHMSA published its notice of intent to consider
the waiver and solicited comments from the public (71 FR 14572). We
received two comments: One concerning ``open'' communications, and the
other supporting the waiver.
One commenter indicated that although APL has proven to be
a good neighbor, he expressed reservations about APL's openness in
communications.
The other commenter supported the waiver because the
benefits of granting the waiver will at least include (1) an increase
in available natural gas pipeline capacity on APL's pipeline, thereby
increasing the amount of natural gas that can be delivered to customer
markets throughout the United States; (2) an improvement in fuel
efficiency through a reduction in required fuel gas, which will lead to
fuel cost savings; and (3) a reduction in capital expenditures by APL,
particularly for expanding its facilities and building new pipelines.
PHMSA reviewed the documentation submitted by APL prior to
proposing action on the waiver petition. PHMSA also requested
additional information as a part of its technical review. APL responded
to information requests from PHMSA and other stakeholders to clarify
technical details of the petition. APL's responses to our supplementary
questions are available in docket PHMSA-2006-23387 at https://
dms.dot.gov.
PHMSA evaluated APL's studies that technically justified the waiver
petition. PHMSA also recognized the superior materials used to
construct the APL system and the full-scale testing sponsored by APL to
verify the fracture control characteristics of the pipe material. APL
proposed operational commitments, when combined with the PHMSA required
safety criteria discussed later in this document, enhance the safety of
the pipeline system and offset the risk of increasing the operating
stress level from 72 percent to 80 percent of SMYS. APL's commitments
and PHMSA's supplementary safety criteria require the APL system to be
more rigorously monitored than other pipelines not covered by a similar
waiver.
PHMSA considered APL's waiver request and whether its proposal will
yield an equivalent or greater degree of safety than that currently
provided by the pipeline safety regulations. PHMSA also reviewed
additional information provided by APL in response to a PHMSA
information request. After reviewing all submitted information,
[[Page 39147]]
PHMSA also developed safety criteria that APL must comply with as a
condition of the waiver. The criteria, listed below, together with the
programs proposed by APL in the waiver petition, would be the basis for
the life-cycle management of the APL pipeline subject to the waiver.
PHMSA received positive comments and conducted a thorough technical
review of APL's application for waiver, supporting documents, and
comments received. In addition, PHMSA sought comments and received
positive feedback from the impacted States along the pipeline and the
Technical Pipeline Safety Standards Committee. PHMSA hereby grants
APL's waiver request provided APL, or a successor operator, complies
with the following supplemental safety criteria:
Pipe and Material Quality
1. Fracture Control Plan: APL must implement an overall fracture
control plan to address fracture initiation, propagation and Charpy
arrest (stop) values. The fracture initiation, propagation and arrest
plan must account for the entire range of temperatures, pressures and
gas compositions that the pipeline will experience.
2. Fittings: All pressure rated fittings and components (including
flanges, valves, gaskets, pressure vessels and compressors) must be
rated for a pressure commensurate with the MAOP and class location of
the pipeline. Designed fittings (including tees, elbows, and caps) must
have the same design factors as the adjacent pipe.
3. Station Design Factor: APL may use a design factor not exceeding
0.54 for existing compressor and meter stations. New compressor and
meter stations must be designed using a design factor of 0.50 per Sec.
192.111.
4. Temperature Control: The compressor station discharge
temperature must be limited to 120[deg] Fahrenheit or a temperature
below the maximum long-term operating temperature for the pipe coating.
5. Overpressure Protection: Mainline pipeline overpressure
protection must be limited to a maximum of 104 percent of MAOP.
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA)
6. SCADA System: APL must use a SCADA system to provide remote
monitoring and control of the entire pipeline system.
7. Mainline Valve Control: Mainline valves that reside on either
side of pipeline segment containing a High Consequence Area (HCA) where
personnel response time to the valve exceeds one (1) hour must be
remotely controlled by the SCADA system. The SCADA system must be
capable of opening and closing the valve and monitoring the valve
position, upstream pressure and downstream pressure. As an alternative
to remote control of mainline valves, APL may implement a leak
detection system.
8. SCADA Set Point Review: APL must implement a detailed procedure
to establish and maintain accurate SCADA set points to ensure the
pipeline is operating within acceptable design limits at all times.
Operations and Maintenance
9. Leak Reporting: APL must notify the PHMSA Central Region Office
as soon as practicable of any non-reportable leaks occurring on the
pipeline covered by the waiver.
10. Annual Reporting: Annually, following approval of the waiver,
APL must report the following:
The results of any ILI or direct assessments performed
within the waiver area during the previous year.
Any new integrity threats identified within the waiver
area during the previous year.
Any encroachment in the waiver area, including the number
of new residences or public gathering areas.
Any reportable incidents within the waiver area that
occurred during the previous year.
Any leaks on the pipeline in the waiver area that occurred
during the previous year.
A list of all repairs on the pipeline in the waiver area
made during the previous year.
On-going damage prevention initiatives on the pipeline in
the waiver area and a discussion of their success.
Any company mergers, acquisitions, transfers of assets, or
other events affecting the regulatory responsibility of the company
operating the pipeline to which this waiver applies.
11. Pipeline Inspection: The pipeline must be capable of passing
ILI. All headers and other segments covered under the waiver that do
not allow the passage of an internal inspection device must have a
corrosion mitigation plan.
12. Gas Quality Monitoring and Control: APL's gas quality
monitoring and mitigation program must have the ability to restrict
constituents that promote internal corrosion to not exceed the
following limits:
H2S (4 grains maximum);
CO2 (3 percent maximum);
H2O (less than or equal to 7 pounds per million
standard cubic feet and no free water); and
Other deleterious constituents that may impact the
integrity of the pipeline must be minimized.
13. Gas Quality Control Equipment: Filters/separators must be
installed at locations where needed to comply with the above gas
quality requirements and meet APL's gas tariff.
14. Control of Liquids: Gas quality monitoring equipment must be
installed to permit the operator to manage the introduction of
contaminants and free liquids into the pipeline.
15. Corrosion Mitigation Plan: APL must submit an external
corrosion mitigation plan as summarized in its waiver petition,
Appendix N.
16. Initial Close Interval Survey: An initial baseline close
interval survey (CIS) must be completed in concert with the baseline
ILI indicated in criteria 24 and as indicated in the operational
commitments of APL's waiver petition.
17. Verification of Cathodic Protection: A CIS must be performed in
concert with an ILI in accordance with subpart O reassessment intervals
for all HCA pipeline mileage. If any annual test point readings fall
below subpart I requirements, remediation must be performed and must
include a CIS on either side of the affected test point.
18. Pipeline Markers: APL must employ line-of-sight marking on the
pipeline in the waiver area except in agricultural areas subject to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission permits or environmental permits
and local restrictions.
19. Pipeline Patrolling: APL must patrol the pipeline at least
monthly to inspect for excavation activities, ground movement, wash-
outs, leakage, and/or other activities and conditions affecting the
safe operation of the pipeline.
20. Monitoring of Ground Movement: An effective monitoring/
mitigation plan must be in place to monitor for and mitigate issues of
unstable soil and ground movement.
21. Uprating Plan Review and Approval: The uprating (commissioning)
plan must be submitted to the PHMSA Central Region Office for review
and approval before increasing the pressure on the pipeline.
22. Preliminary Criteria Reporting: A preliminary report describing
the results, completion dates and status of actions required under
supplemental safety criteria contained herein must be completed and
submitted to PHMSA Headquarters and PHMSA Central Region Office prior
to increasing the pressure on the pipeline system.
23. Criteria Completion Reporting: A report describing results,
completion dates and status of the outstanding criteria must be
submitted to PHMSA
[[Page 39148]]
Headquarters and PHMSA Central Region Office within 180 days after
completion of uprating.
A final report must be submitted to PHMSA Headquarters and PHMSA
Central Regional Office upon completion of the second ILI run for the
pipeline.
Integrity Management
24. Initial ILI: A baseline ILI must be performed in association
with this waiver on the pipeline using a high-resolution inline
inspection technology capable of detecting metal loss and mechanical
damage. The results of the baseline ILI must be integrated with the
baseline CIS as described in criteria number 16.
25. Future ILI: A second high resolution MFL inspection must be
performed on the pipe subject to the waiver following the baseline ILI
and be completed within the first reassessment interval required by
subpart O, regardless of HCA classification. Future ILI must be
performed on a frequency consistent with subpart O for the entire
pipeline covered by this waiver.
26. Direct Assessment Plan: Headers, mainline valve bypasses, and
other sections covered by this waiver that cannot accommodate ILI tools
must be part of a Direct Assessment plan or other acceptable integrity
monitoring method.
27. Damage Prevention Program: Common Ground Alliance's damage
prevention best practices must be incorporated into APL's damage
prevention program.
28. Anomaly Evaluation and Repair: Anomaly evaluations and repairs
must be performed based upon the following:
For purposes of this criterion, the Failure Pressure Ratio
(FPR) is an indication of the pipeline's remaining strength from an
anomaly and is equal to the predicted failure pressure divided by the
MAOP.
Anomaly Response Time.
[cir] Any anomaly with a FPR equal to or less than 1.1 must be
treated as an ``immediate repair'' per subpart O.
[cir] Any anomaly with a FPR equal to or less than 1.25 must be
remediated within 12 months per subpart O.
[cir] Any anomaly with an FPR greater than 1.25 must have a
remediation schedule per subpart O.
Anomaly Repair Criteria.
[cir] Segments operating at MAOP equal to 80 percent stress level--
Any anomaly evaluated and found to have an FPR equal to or less than
1.25 must be repaired.
[cir] Segments operating at MAOP equal to 66 percent stress level--
Any anomaly evaluated and found to have an FPR equal to or less than
1.50 must be repaired.
[cir] Segments operating at MAOP equal to 56 percent stress level--
Any anomaly evaluated and found to have an FPR equal to or less than
1.80 must be repaired.
a. All other pipe segments with anomalies that are not repaired
must be reassessed according to subpart O and ASME Standard B31.8S
requirements. Each anomaly not repaired must have a corrosion growth
rate and an ILI tolerance assigned to it per the Gas IMP to determine
the maximum re-inspection interval.
b. APL must confirm that the remaining strength (R-STRENG)
effective area method, R-STRENG-0.85dL, and B31G assessment methods are
valid for the pipe diameter, wall thickness, grade, operating pressure,
operating stress level, and operating temperature covered under this
waiver. If the assessment methods are not valid, APL must submit a
valid method to PHMSA Central Region Office. Until confirmation of the
previously mentioned anomaly assessment calculations have been
performed, APL must use the most conservative of the calculations for
anomaly evaluation.
c. Dents must be evaluated and repaired in accordance with
Sec. Sec. 192.309(b)(ii) and 192.933(d)(l)(ii).
29. Potential Impact Radius Calculation Updates: If the pipeline
operating pressures and gas quality are determined to be outside the
parameters of the C-FER Study, a new study with the updated parameters
must be incorporated into the IMP.
If at anytime PHMSA determines the effect of the waiver is
inconsistent with pipeline safety, PHMSA will revoke the waiver at its
sole discretion.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60118 (c) and 49 CFR 1.53.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 5, 2006.
Theodore L. Willke,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 06-6106 Filed 7-6-06; 9:10 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P