Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines, 39154-39185 [06-5968]
Download as PDF
39154
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 60, 85, 89, 94, 1039, 1065,
and 1068
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–0029, FRL–8190–7]
RIN 2060–AM82
Standards of Performance for
Stationary Compression Ignition
Internal Combustion Engines
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is promulgating
standards of performance for stationary
compression ignition (CI) internal
combustion engines (ICE). The
standards will implement section 111(b)
of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and are
based on the Administrator’s
determination that stationary CI ICE
cause, or contribute significantly to, air
pollution that may reasonably be
anticipated to endanger public health or
welfare. The intended effect of the
standards is to require all new,
modified, and reconstructed stationary
CI ICE to use the best demonstrated
system of continuous emission
reduction, considering costs, non-air
quality health, and environmental and
energy impacts, not just with add-on
controls, but also by eliminating or
reducing the formation of these
pollutants. The final standards will
reduce nitrogen oxides (NOX) by an
estimated 38,000 tons per year (tpy),
particulate matter (PM) by an estimated
3,000 tpy, sulfur dioxide (SO2) by an
estimated 9,000 tpy, non-methane
hydrocarbons (NMHC) by an estimated
600 tpy, and carbon monoxide (CO) by
an estimated 18,000 tpy in the year
2015.
DATES: The final rule is effective on
September 11, 2006. The incorporation
by reference of a certain publication
listed in the final rule is approved by
the Director of the Federal Register as of
September 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–0029. We also
rely on documents in Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0012 and
incorporate that docket into the record
for the final rule. All documents in the
docket are listed on the
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., confidential
business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
NAICS 1
Category
Any manufacturer that produces or any industry using a stationary internal combustion engine as defined in the final rule.
2211
622110
335312
33391
333992
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
1 North
the Air and Radiation Docket, EPA/DC,
EPA West, Room B102, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Docket Facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
Docket telephone number is (202) 566–
1742. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for EPA
Docket Center is (202) 566–1742. As of
the date of signature, the physical
docket is temporarily unavailable due to
flooding, but interested members of the
public can receive the list of documents
in the docket or any particular
documents electronically by accessing
the electronic docket or by calling the
contact person. We hope that the
physical docket will be accessible again
before publication.
Mr.
´
Jaime Pagan, Energy Strategies Group,
Sector Policies and Programs Division
(D243–01), U.S. EPA, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone
number (919) 541–5340; facsimile
number (919) 541–5450; electronic mail
address pagan.jaime@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulated Entities. Categories and
entities potentially regulated by this
action include:
Examples of regulated entities
Electric power generation, transmission, or distribution.
Medical and surgical hospitals.
Motor and generator manufacturing.
Pump and compressor manufacturing.
Welding and soldering equipment manufacturing.
American Industry Classification System.
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
regulated by this action. To determine
whether your engine is regulated by this
action, you should examine the
applicability criteria in § 60.4200 of the
final rule. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the person
listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Worldwide Web (WWW). In addition
to being available in the docket, an
electronic copy of the final rule will be
available on the WWW through the
Technology Transfer Network Web site
(TTN). Following signature, EPA will
post a copy of the final rule on the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
TTN’s policy and guidance page for
newly proposed or promulgated rules at
https://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg. The TTN
provides information and technology
exchange in various areas of air
pollution control.
Judicial Review. Under CAA section
307(b)(1), judicial review of the final
rule is available only by filing a petition
for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia by
September 11, 2006. Under CAA section
307(d)(7)(B), only an objection to the
final rule that was raised with
reasonable specificity during the period
for public comment can be raised during
judicial review. Moreover, under CAA
section 307(b)(2), the requirements
established by this final action may not
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
be challenged separately in any civil or
criminal proceedings brought by EPA to
enforce these requirements.
Section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA
further provides that ‘‘[o]nly an
objection to a rule or procedure which
was raised with reasonable specificity
during the period for public comment
(including any public hearing) may be
raised during judicial review.’’ This
section also provides a mechanism for
EPA to convene a proceeding for
reconsideration, ‘‘[i]f the person raising
an objection can demonstrate to EPA
that it was impracticable to raise such
objection within [the period for public
comment] or if the grounds for such
objection arose after the period for
public comment (but within the same
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
time specified for judicial review) and if
such objection is of central relevance to
the outcome of the rule.’’ Any person
seeking to make such a demonstration to
EPA should submit a Petition for
Reconsideration to the Office of the
Administrator, U.S. EPA, Room 3000,
Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, with
a copy to both the person(s) listed in the
preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section, and the Director of the
Air and Radiation Law Office, Office of
General Counsel (Mail Code 2344A),
U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20004.
Background Information Document.
EPA proposed new source performance
standards (NSPS) for CI ICE on July 11,
2005 (70 FR 39870), and received 47
comment letters on the proposal. A
background information document (BID)
(‘‘Response to Public Comments on
Proposed Standards of Performance for
Stationary Compression Ignition
Internal Combustion Engines,’’)
containing EPA’s responses to each
public comment and the Economic
Impact Analysis Report are available in
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–
0029.
Organization of This Document. The
following outline is provided to aid in
locating information in the preamble.
I. Background
II. Summary of the Final Rule
A. What is the source category regulated by
the final rule?
B. What are the pollutants regulated by the
final rule?
C. What sources are subject to the final
rule?
D. What are the final standards?
E. What are the requirements for sources
that are modified or reconstructed?
F. What are the requirements for
demonstrating compliance?
G. What are the monitoring requirements?
H. What are the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements?
III. Summary of Significant Changes Since
Proposal
A. Applicability
B. Fuel Requirements
C. Maintenance and Testing
D. Emission Standards
E. Recordkeeping
IV. Summary of Responses to Major
Comments
A. Applicability/Effective Date
B. Modeling Mobile Source Program
C. Fuel Requirements
D. Maintenance and Testing
E. Emission Standards
F. Military Training Engines
V. Summary of Environmental, Energy and
Economic Impacts
A. What are the air quality impacts?
B. What are the cost impacts?
C. What are the economic impacts?
D. What are the non-air health,
environmental and energy impacts?
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
E. What are the benefits?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
J. Congressional Review Act
I. Background
This action promulgates NSPS that
will apply to new stationary CI ICE.
New source performance standards
implement section 111(b) of the CAA,
and are issued for categories of sources
which cause, or contribute significantly
to, air pollution which may reasonably
be anticipated to endanger public health
or welfare. The standards apply to new
stationary sources of emissions, i.e.,
sources whose construction,
reconstruction, or modification begins
after a standard for those sources is
proposed. NSPS require these sources to
control emissions to the level achievable
by best demonstrated technology (BDT),
considering costs and any non-air
quality health and environmental
impacts and energy requirements.
II. Summary of the Final Rule
A. What is the source category regulated
by the final rule?
The final rule applies to stationary CI
ICE. A stationary internal combustion
engine means any internal combustion
engine, except combustion turbines, that
converts heat energy into mechanical
work and is not mobile. Stationary ICE
differ from mobile ICE in that a
stationary internal combustion engine is
not a nonroad engine as defined at 40
CFR 1068.30 (excluding paragraph
(2)(ii) of that definition), and is not used
to propel a motor vehicle or a vehicle
used solely for competition. Stationary
ICE include reciprocating ICE, rotary
ICE, and other ICE, except combustion
turbines. A CI engine means a type of
stationary internal combustion engine
that is not a spark ignition (SI) engine.
A SI engine means a gasoline, natural
gas, or liquefied petroleum gas fueled
engine or any other type of engine with
a spark plug (or other sparking device)
and with operating characteristics
significantly similar to the theoretical
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39155
Otto combustion cycle. Spark ignition
engines usually use a throttle to regulate
intake air flow to control power during
normal operation. Dual-fuel engines in
which a liquid fuel (typically diesel
fuel) is used for CI and gaseous fuel
(typically natural gas) is used as the
primary fuel at an annual average ratio
of less than 2 parts diesel fuel to 100
parts total fuel on an energy equivalent
basis are SI engines.
B. What are the pollutants regulated by
the final rule?
The pollutants to be regulated by the
final rule are NOX, PM, CO, and
NMHC.1 Emissions of sulfur oxides
(SOX) will also be reduced through the
use of lower sulfur fuel. Smoke
emissions will also be reduced through
the implementation of the final
standards. Emissions of hazardous air
pollutants (HAP) from these engines
have been, or will be, regulated in
separate rulemakings promulgated
under CAA section 112.2
C. What sources are subject to the final
rule?
The affected source for the CI ICE
NSPS is each stationary CI internal
combustion engine whose construction,
modification or reconstruction
commenced after July 11, 2005. The
date of construction is the date the
engine is ordered by the owner or
operator. Stationary CI ICE
manufactured prior to April 1, 2006,
that are not fire pump engines are not
subject to the final rule, unless the
engines are modified or reconstructed
after July 11, 2005. Stationary fire pump
CI ICE manufactured prior to July 1,
2006, are not subject to the final rule
either, unless the engines are modified
or reconstructed after July 11, 2005.
Manufacturers of 2007 and later model
year stationary CI ICE that are not fire
pumps are subject to the final rule. For
fire pump engines, the date of
manufacturing is the date the engine is
built into a certified National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) fire
pump engine. Manufacturers of fire
1 Primarily for reasons of testing ease and because
engine manufacturers are familiar with testing for
NMHC, this rule, as with previous rules
promulgating emission standards for mobile source
internal combustion engines, uses NMHC rather
than VOC as the metric for measuring organic
compounds that can contribute to ozone formation.
C.f. 40 CFR part 60, Method 25 (Determination of
Total Gaseous Nonmethane Organic Emissions as
Carbon.)
2 Emissions of HAP from stationary reciprocating
internal combustion engines (RICE) located at major
sources were the subject of a final rule published
on June 15, 2004 (69 FR 33473). Emissions of HAP
from other stationary RICE will be the subject of
another rulemaking that will be promulgated no
later than December 20, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
39156
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
pump engines are subject to the final
rule beginning with the first model year
that new fire pump engines in a
particular horsepower class must meet
standards more stringent than Tier 1
standards, which can be any model year
from 2008 to 2011, depending on the
horsepower of the engine.
Owners and operators of new
stationary CI ICE who are subject to the
final rule (as discussed above) must
meet the requirements of § 60.4208 of
the final rule, which restricts the
installation of engines subject to
outdated emission standards. This
restriction applies only to the
installation of new engines subject to
the final rule, and does not apply to the
installation of previously used engines.
D. What are the final standards?
1. Overview
The format of the final standard is an
output-based emission standard for PM,
NOX, CO, and NMHC in units of
emissions mass per unit work
performed (grams per kilowatt-hour (g/
KW-hr)) and smoke standards as a
percentage. The emission standards are
generally modeled after EPA’s standards
for nonroad and marine diesel engines.
The nonroad diesel engine standards are
phased in over several years and have
Tiers with increasing levels of
stringency. The engine model year in
which the Tiers take effect varies for
different size ranges of engines. The Tier
1 standards were phased in for nonroad
diesel engines beginning in 1996 to
2000. The Tier 2 nonroad CI standards
are phased in starting from 2001 to
2006, and the Tier 3 limits are phased
in starting from 2006 to 2008. The Tier
3 limits apply for engines greater than
or equal to 50 and less than or equal to
750 horsepower (HP) only. Tier 4 limits
for nonroad engines are phased in
beginning in 2008.
2. Final Standards for Engine
Manufacturers
Engine manufacturers must meet the
emission standards of the rule during
the useful life of the engine. a. 2007
Model Year and Later Non-Emergency
Stationary CI ICE ≤3,000 HP and With
a Displacement <10 Liters per Cylinder.
The standards require that engine
manufacturers certify their 2007 model
year and later non-emergency stationary
CI ICE with a maximum engine power
less than or equal to 3,000 HP and a
displacement of less than 10 liters per
cylinder to the Tier 2 through Tier 4
nonroad diesel engine standards as
shown in table 1 of this preamble, as
applicable, for all pollutants, for the
same model year and maximum engine
power.
TABLE 1.—NOX, NMHC, CO, AND PM EMISSION STANDARDS IN G/KW-HR (G/HP-HR) FOR 2007 MODEL YEAR AND
LATER NON-EMERGENCY ENGINES ≤3,000 HP AND WITH A DISPLACEMENT <10 LITERS PER CYLINDER AND 2011
MODEL YEAR AND LATER NON-EMERGENCY ENGINES >3,000 HP AND WITH A DISPLACEMENT <10 LITERS PER CYLINDER a
Maximum engine power
Model
year(s)
NMHC +
NOX
NMHC
NOX
CO
PM
KW<8 (HP<11) .................................................................
2007
2008+
2007
2008+
2007
2008–2012
2013+
2007
2008–2012
2013+
2007
2008–2011
2012–2013
2014+
2007
2008–2011
2012–2013
2014+
2007–2010
2011–2013
2014+
2007–2010
2011–2014
2015+
2007–2010
2011–2014
2015+
2007–2010
2011–2014
2015+
7.5 (5.6)
....................
....................
....................
7.5 (5.6)
....................
4.7 (3.5)
7.5 (5.6)
4.7 (3.5)
....................
7.5 (5.6)
4.7 (3.5)
....................
....................
4.0 (3.0)
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
b 0.19 (0.14)
0.19 (0.14)
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
b 0.40 (0.30)
0.40 (0.30)
....................
8.0 (6.0)
....................
6.6 (4.9)
....................
5.5 (4.1)
....................
....................
5.0 (3.7)
....................
....................
....................
....................
5.0 (3.7)
0.80 (0.60)
0.40 (0.30)
0.80 (0.60)
0.40 (0.30)
0.60 (0.45)
0.30 (0.22)
0.03 (0.02)
0.40 (0.30)
a 0.30 (0.22)
0.03 (0.02)
0.40 (0.30)
....................
0.02 (0.01)
....................
0.30 (0.22)
....................
....................
4.0 (3.0)
....................
....................
6.4 (4.8)
....................
....................
6.4 (4.8)
....................
....................
6.4 (4.8)
....................
....................
b 0.19
b 0.40
5.0 (3.7)
0.02 (0.01)
3.5 (2.6)
....................
0.20 (0.15)
0.02 (0.01)
3.5 (2.6)
....................
....................
3.5 (2.6)
....................
....................
3.5 (2.6)
....................
....................
0.20 (0.15)
0.10 (0.075)
0.04 (0.03)
0.20 (0.15)
0.10 (0.075)
0.03 (0.02)
0.20 (0.15)
0.10 (0.075)
0.03 (0.02)
8≤KW<19 .........................................................................
(11≤HP<25) ......................................................................
19≤KW<37 (25≤HP<50) ...................................................
37≤KW<56 (50≤HP<75) ...................................................
56≤KW<75 (75≤HP<100) .................................................
75≤KW<130 (100≤HP<175) .............................................
130≤KW<560 (175≤HP<750) ...........................................
KW>560 (HP>750) ...........................................................
Except generator sets ......................................................
Generator sets 560900 (HP>1200) ...............................
(0.14)
0.19 (0.14)
....................
b 0.19 (0.14)
0.19 (0.14)
....................
0.40 (0.30)
0.19 (0.14)
....................
0.40 (0.30)
0.19 (0.14)
....................
0.40 (0.30)
0.19 (0.14)
(0.30)
0.40 (0.30)
....................
b 0.40 (0.30)
0.40 (0.30)
....................
3.5 (2.6)
3.5 (2.6)
....................
3.5 (2.6)
0.67 (0.50)
....................
0.67 (0.50)
....................
a A manufacturer has the option of skipping the 0.30 g/KW-hr PM standard for all 37–56 KW (50–75 HP) engines. The 0.03 g/KW-hr standard
would then take effect 1 year earlier for all 37–56 KW (50–75 HP) engines, in 2012. The Tier 3 standard (0.40 g/KW-hr) would be in effect until
2012.
b 50 percent of the engines produced have to meet the NO + NMHC standard, and 50 percent have to meet the separate NO and NMHC
X
X
limits.
b. 2007 Model Year and Later NonEmergency Stationary CI ICE >3,000 HP
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:45 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
and With a Displacement <10 Liters per
Cylinder. The standards require that
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
engine manufacturers certify their 2007
through 2010 model year non-
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
39157
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
emergency stationary CI ICE with a
maximum engine power greater than
3,000 HP and a displacement of less
than 10 liters per cylinder to the
emission standards shown in table 2 of
this preamble. For 2011 model year and
later non-emergency stationary CI ICE
with a maximum engine power greater
than 3,000 HP and a displacement of
less than 10 liters per cylinder,
manufacturers must certify these
engines to the Tier 4 nonroad diesel
engine standards as shown in table 1 of
this preamble, as applicable, for all
pollutants, for the same model year and
maximum engine power.
TABLE 2.—NOX, NMHC, CO, AND PM EMISSION STANDARDS IN G/KW-HR (G/HP-HR) FOR PRE-2007 MODEL YEAR ENGINES WITH A DISPLACEMENT <10 LITERS PER CYLINDER AND 2007–2010 MODEL YEAR ENGINES >3,000 HP AND
WITH A DISPLACEMENT <10 LITERS PER CYLINDER
Maximum engine power
NMHC + NOX
HC
NOX
CO
PM
KW<8 (HP<11) .....................................................................................
8≤KW<19 (11≤HP<25) .........................................................................
19≤KW<37 (25≤HP<50) .......................................................................
37≤KW<56 (50≤HP<75) .......................................................................
56≤KW<75 (75≤HP<100) .....................................................................
75≤KW<130 (100≤HP<175) .................................................................
130≤KW<225 (175≤HP<300) ...............................................................
225≤KW<450 (300≤HP<600) ...............................................................
450≤KW≤560 (600≤HP≤750) ...............................................................
KW>560 (HP>750) ...............................................................................
10.5 (7.8)
9.5 (7.1)
9.5 (7.1)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
1.3 (1.0)
1.3 (1.0)
1.3 (1.0)
1.3 (1.0)
....................
....................
....................
9.2 (6.9)
9.2 (6.9)
9.2 (6.9)
9.2 (6.9)
9.2 (6.9)
9.2 (6.9)
9.2 (6.9)
8.0 (6.0)
6.6 (4.9)
5.5 (4.1)
....................
....................
....................
11.4 (8.5)
11.4 (8.5)
11.4 (8.5)
11.4 (8.5)
1.0 (0.75)
0.80 (0.60)
0.80 (0.60)
....................
....................
....................
0.54 (0.40)
0.54 (0.40)
0.54 (0.40)
0.54 (0.40)
c. 2007 Model Year and Later NonEmergency Stationary CI ICE with a
Displacement ≥10 and <30 Liters per
Cylinder. The standards require that
engine manufacturers certify their 2007
model year and later non-emergency
stationary CI ICE with a displacement of
greater than or equal to 10 liters per
cylinder and less than 30 liters per
cylinder to the certification emission
standards for new marine CI engines in
40 CFR 94.8, as applicable, for all
pollutants, for the same displacement
and maximum engine power. These
emission standards are shown in table 3
of this preamble.
TABLE 3.— NOX, THC, CO, AND PM EMISSION STANDARDS IN G/KW-HR FOR 2007 MODEL YEAR AND LATER
STATIONARY CI ICE WITH A DISPLACEMENT ≥10 AND <30 LITERS PER CYLINDER
Engine size—liters per cylinder, rated power
THC + NOX
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
5.0≤displacement<15.0 All Power Levels ................................................................................................................
15.0≤displacement<20.0 <3,300 KW ......................................................................................................................
15.0≤displacement<20.0 ≥3,300 KW .......................................................................................................................
20.0≤displacement<25.0 All Power Levels ..............................................................................................................
25.0≤displacement<30.0 All Power Levels ..............................................................................................................
d. 2007 Model Year and Later
Emergency Stationary CI ICE <30 Liters
per Cylinder. The standards require that
manufacturers certify their 2007 model
year and later emergency stationary CI
ICE less than or equal to 3,000 HP and
with a displacement of less than 10
liters per cylinder that are not fire pump
engines to Tier 2 through Tier 3 nonroad
CI engine emission standards, and Tier
4 nonroad CI engine standards that do
not require add-on control, according to
the nonroad diesel engine schedule.
Manufacturers must certify their 2007
through 2010 model year emergency
stationary CI ICE greater than 3,000 HP
and with a displacement less than 10
liters per cylinder that are not fire pump
engines to the emission standards
shown in table 2 of this preamble.
Manufacturers must certify their 2011
model year and later emergency
stationary CI ICE that are greater than
3,000 HP and with a displacement less
than 10 liters per cylinder that are not
fire pumps to Tier 2 and Tier 3 nonroad
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:45 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
CI engine standards, and to Tier 4
nonroad CI engine standards that do not
require add-on control. Manufacturers
are required to certify their 2007 model
year and later emergency stationary CI
ICE with a displacement of greater than
or equal to 10 liters per cylinder and
less than 30 liters per cylinder to the
certification emission standards for new
marine CI engines in 40 CFR 94.8.
Manufacturers must certify their postTier 1 emergency fire pumps to the
emission standards shown in table 4 of
this preamble.
3. Final Standards for Owners and
Operators
Owners and operators of stationary CI
ICE are required to meet the emission
standards in the final rule over the
entire life of the engine.
a. Stationary CI ICE with a
Displacement <30 Liters per Cylinder.
Owners and operators that purchase
pre-2007 model year stationary CI ICE
with a displacement of less than 10
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
7.8
8.7
9.8
9.8
11.0
CO
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
PM
0.27
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
liters per cylinder that are not fire pump
engines must meet the emission
standards for pre-2007 model year
engines, which are shown in table 2 of
this preamble. Owners and operators
that purchase pre-2007 model year
stationary CI ICE with a displacement of
greater than or equal to 10 and less than
30 liters per cylinder that are not fire
pump engines must meet the emissions
standards in 40 CFR 94.8(a)(1). Section
94.8(a)(1) specifies the following NOX
limits: 17.0 g/KW-hr (12.7 g/HP-hr)
when the maximum test speed is less
than 130 revolutions per minute (rpm);
45.0 × N¥0.20 when maximum test speed
is at least 130 but less than 2000 rpm,
where N is the maximum test speed of
the engine in rpm; and 9.8 g/KW-hr (7.3
g/HP-hr) when maximum test speed is
2000 rpm or more.
Owners and operators that purchase
fire pump engines must meet the
emission standards in table 4 to the final
rule.
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
39158
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Owners and operators that purchase
2007 model year and later stationary CI
ICE with a displacement of less than 30
liters per cylinder that are not fire pump
engines, and post-Tier 1 fire pump
engines, must purchase an engine that is
certified by the manufacturer according
to the provisions of the rule.
b. Stationary CI ICE with a
Displacement ≥30 Liters per Cylinder.
Owners and operators of stationary CI
ICE with a displacement of greater than
or equal to 30 liters per cylinder are
required to reduce NOX emissions by 90
percent or more, or alternatively they
must limit the emissions of NOX in the
stationary CI internal combustion
engine exhaust to 1.6 g/KW-hr (1.2 g/
HP-hr). Owners and operators of
stationary CI ICE with a displacement of
greater than or equal to 30 liters per
cylinder are also required to reduce PM
emissions by 60 percent or more, or
alternatively they must limit the
emissions of PM in the stationary CI
internal combustion engine exhaust to
0.15 grams per KW-hour (0.11 grams per
HP-hour).
4. Final Standards for Manufacturers
and Owners and Operators of
Emergency Stationary Fire Pump
Engines
The rule requires that owners and
operators of emergency fire pump
engines meet the emission standards
shown in table 4 of this preamble, for
all pollutants, for the same model year
and NFPA nameplate engine power.
Starting with the model year in which
the most stringent standards begin for
each HP range, emergency fire pumps
must be certified to the emission
standards shown in table 4 of this
preamble. Emergency fire pump engines
between 50 and 600 HP with a rated
speed of greater than 2,650 rpm have
been given an additional 3 years to meet
the most stringent emission standards.
TABLE 4.—NOX, NMHC, CO, AND PM EMISSION STANDARDS IN G/KW-HR (G/HP-HR) FOR EMERGENCY FIRE PUMP
ENGINES
Maximum engine power
KW<8 (HP<11) .....................................................
8≤KW<19 (11≤HP<25) .........................................
19≤KW<37 (25≤HP<50) .......................................
37≤KW<56 (50≤HP<75) .......................................
56≤KW<75 (75≤HP<100) .....................................
75≤KW<130 (100≤HP<175) .................................
130≤KW<225 (175≤HP<300) ...............................
225≤KW<450 (300≤HP<600) ...............................
450≤KW≤560 (600≤HP≤750) ................................
KW>560 (HP>750) ...............................................
a Emergency
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
2010
2011
2010
2011
2010
2011
2010
2011
2010
2011
2009
2010
2008
2009
2008
2009
2008
2009
2007
2008
and earlier ...................................................
+ ..................................................................
and earlier ...................................................
+ ..................................................................
and earlier ...................................................
+ ..................................................................
and earlier ...................................................
+ a ................................................................
and earlier ...................................................
+ a ................................................................
and earlier ...................................................
+ a ................................................................
and earlier ...................................................
+ a ................................................................
and earlier ...................................................
+ a ................................................................
and earlier ...................................................
+ ..................................................................
and earlier ...................................................
+ ..................................................................
10.5
7.5
9.5
7.5
9.5
7.5
10.5
4.7
10.5
4.7
10.5
4.0
10.5
4.0
10.5
4.0
10.5
4.0
10.5
6.4
(7.8)
(5.6)
(7.1)
(5.6)
(7.1)
(5.6)
(7.8)
(3.5)
(7.8)
(3.5)
(7.8)
(3.0)
(7.8)
(3.0)
(7.8)
(3.0)
(7.8)
(3.0)
(7.8)
(4.8)
CO
8.0 (6.0)
....................
6.6 (4.9)
....................
5.5 (4.1)
....................
5.0 (3.7)
....................
5.0 (3.7)
....................
5.0 (3.7)
....................
3.5 (2.6)
....................
3.5 (2.6)
....................
3.5 (2.6)
....................
3.5 (2.6)
....................
PM
1.0
0.40
0.80
0.40
0.80
0.30
0.80
0.40
0.80
0.40
0.80
0.30
0.54
0.20
0.54
0.20
0.54
0.20
0.54
0.20
(0.75)
(0.30)
(0.60)
(0.30)
(0.60)
(0.22)
(0.60)
(0.30)
(0.60)
(0.30)
(0.60)
(0.22)
(0.40)
(0.15)
(0.40)
(0.15)
(0.40)
(0.15)
(0.40)
(0.15)
fire pump engines with a rated speed of greater than 2,650 rpm are allowed an additional 3 years to meet these standards.
5. Fuel Requirements
In addition to emission standards, the
final rule requires that beginning
October 1, 2007, owners and operators
of stationary CI ICE that use diesel fuel
must only use diesel fuel meeting the
requirements of 40 CFR 80.510(a),
which requires that diesel fuel have a
maximum sulfur content of 500 parts
per million (ppm) and either a
minimum cetane index of 40 or a
maximum aromatic content of 35
volume percent. Beginning October 1,
2010, owners and operators of stationary
CI ICE with a displacement of less than
30 liters per cylinder that use diesel fuel
must only use diesel fuel meeting the
requirements of 40 CFR 80.510(b) for
nonroad diesel fuel, which requires that
diesel fuel have a maximum sulfur
content of 15 ppm and either a
minimum cetane index of 40 or a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
NMHC +
NOX
Model year(s)
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
maximum aromatic content of 35
volume percent. The final rule does not
contain a standard for SO2; the use of
low sulfur diesel fuel will result in
lower emissions of SO2. EPA does not
expect that the lubricity of the ultra low
sulfur diesel (ULSD) will be an issue
because additives can be added to ULSD
to achieve a sufficient lubricity.
Manufacturers of stationary CI ICE
with a displacement of 30 liters per
cylinder or more indicated that they are
able to operate their engines on 500
ppm sulfur fuel, but they do not have
any experience operating their engines
on 15 ppm sulfur fuel, and they need to
perform testing to ensure there are no
problems with the lubricity of the ULSD
fuel. The use of ULSD is not required for
owners and operators of these engines.
The fuel requirements of this rule
only apply to engines that are subject to
this rule, i.e., those engines that meet
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the applicability provisions of § 60.4200
of the final rule.
E. What are the requirements for sources
that are modified or reconstructed?
The final standards apply to
stationary CI ICE that are modified or
reconstructed after July 11, 2005. The
guidelines for determining whether a
source is modified or reconstructed are
given in 40 CFR 60.14 and 40 CFR
60.15, respectively. Stationary CI ICE
that are modified or reconstructed must
meet the emission standards for the
model year in which the engine was
originally new, not the year the engine
was modified or reconstructed.
Therefore, a pre-2007 model year engine
modified after 2007 must meet the
emission standards for pre-2007 model
year engines.
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
F. What are the requirements for
demonstrating compliance?
1. Engine Manufacturers
Manufacturers of stationary CI ICE
must demonstrate compliance with the
final rule by certifying that their 2007
model year and later stationary CI ICE
with displacement less than 30 liters per
cylinder meet the emission standards in
the final rule using the certification
procedures in subpart B of 40 CFR part
89, subpart C of 40 CFR part 94, or
subpart C of 40 CFR part 1039, as
applicable, and must test their engines
as specified in those parts.
Manufacturers of fire pump engines do
not have to certify Tier 1 engines and,
for post-Tier 1 engines, may use the
optional test cycle provided in table 6
to the final rule. Manufacturers of
certified stationary CI ICE that must
meet the emission standards of 40 CFR
part 1039 must also meet the emissionrelated warranty requirements of 40 CFR
1039.120; the provisions in 40 CFR
1039.125 and 40 CFR 1039.130, which
require the engine manufacturer to
provide engine installation and
maintenance instructions to buyers; the
engine labeling requirements in 40 CFR
1039.135; and the general compliance
provisions in 40 CFR part 1068.
Manufacturers of certified stationary CI
ICE that must meet the emission
standards of 40 CFR part 89 or 40 CFR
part 94 must meet the corresponding
provisions of 40 CFR part 89 or 40 CFR
part 94 for engines that would be
covered by that part if they were
nonroad (including marine) engines.
After the Tier 4 standards take effect,
manufacturers of emergency stationary
CI ICE that do not meet the standards for
non-emergency engines must add to
each such emergency engine a
permanent label which states that the
engine is for emergency use only.
Engine manufacturers must also specify
in the owner’s manual that operation of
emergency engines is limited to
emergency operations and required
maintenance and testing.
Engine manufacturers that certify an
engine family or families to standards
under the final rule that are identical to
standards applicable under 40 CFR part
89, 40 CFR part 94, or 40 CFR part 1039
for that model year may certify any such
family that contains both nonroad
(including marine) and stationary
engines as a single engine family and/
or may include any such family
containing stationary engines in the
averaging, banking and trading (ABT)
provisions applicable for such engines
under those parts.
EPA has used ABT often in the
context of the nonroad engine program.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
The averaging provisions basically
allow manufacturers to certify certain
engine families to emission levels more
stringent than required and to certify
other engine families to levels less
stringent than required, as long as the
average emission levels to which these
engine families are certified are at least
equal to the appropriate standards. The
banking program allows manufacturers
to generate credits by certifying engine
families to more stringent standards
than required in a particular year and to
use such credits in later years. The
trading provisions allow engine
manufacturers to trade credits with
other engine manufacturers covered by
the same requirements. The ABT
provisions include significant
restrictions and compliance
requirements, including upper limits on
the level to which any engine family
may certify.
Under the nonroad engine program,
the ABT provisions, where applied, are
important elements in our
determination of the standards of
performance that represent ‘‘the greatest
degree of emission reduction achievable
through the application of technology
which the Administrator determines
will be available for the engines * * *
to which the standards apply, giving
appropriate consideration to the cost of
applying such technology within the
period of time available to
manufacturers and to noise, energy and
safety factors * * *.’’ See CAA section
213(a)(3) and Natural Resources Defense
Council v. Thomas, 805 F.2d 410, 425
(D.C. Cir. 1986) (upholding EPA
regulations allowing manufacturers to
meet emission standards for heavy-duty
engines by averaging among engine
families); see also discussions at 69 FR
38996 (June 29, 2004) and 55 FR 30584,
93–99 (July 26, 1990).
Similarly, we believe that these ABT
provisions are essential elements in our
determination that the final standards
reflect best BDT. The flexibility
provided by the ABT provisions allows
the manufacturer to adjust its
compliance for engine families for
which coming into compliance with the
standards will be particularly difficult
or costly, without special delays or
exceptions having to be written into the
final rule. Emission-credit programs also
create an incentive for the early
introduction of new technology (for
example, to generate credits in early
years to create compliance flexibility for
later engines), which allows certain
engine families to act as trailblazers for
new technology. This improves the
feasibility of achieving the standards for
the entire population of regulated
engines. EPA has concluded as a factual
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39159
matter, as reflected in this final rule,
that an ABT program, operated at the
level of the manufacturer, represents the
best system of emissions reductions,
considering all relevant factors.
We believe the ABT provisions are
appropriate for this program. The ABT
provisions are applicable to engine
manufacturers, who manufacture
numerous engines for use in all areas of
the country, as opposed to the final
owner/operators of the units. These
standards will apply to hundreds of
different engine families that will be
used in tens of thousands of different
engines. The flexibility provided by the
ABT program is an important
instrument for manufacturers to use in
meeting the stringent standards of this
program affecting a large number of
engine families.
We are finalizing minor revisions to
several existing mobile source
regulations to help incorporate several
of these provisions.
EPA is requiring that manufacturers of
stationary CI ICE that are seeking
certificates of conformity be subject to
the same fee provisions as those
promulgated for comparable land-based
and marine nonroad engines in EPA’s
most recent fees rulemaking (see 69 FR
26222, May 11, 2004) and be required to
comply with the fees rule in the same
manner as manufacturers already
subject to the fees regulations. Because
EPA will be providing certificates of
conformity to stationary CI ICE
manufacturers and, thus is providing a
service or thing of value to the
manufacturers, the Independent Offices
Appropriations Act (31 U.S.C. 9701)
authorizes such a fee collection. Having
reviewed the recent fees rule for the
motor vehicle and engine compliance
program, and its associated cost study
which examined EPA’s incurred cost of
compliance services, we believe that the
fees provided in that rule are
appropriate for the comparable costs of
administering the compliance program
for the engines associated with this final
rule. These engines are subject to the
same general compliance regime as
land-based nonroad CI engines and, for
those with a displacement between 10
and 30 liters per cylinder, marine
engines covered by the existing fees
rule. We believe fees for each respective
request for certification of conformity
for stationary CI ICE should have the
same fee amount as for those engines.
Under the provisions of the existing
fees rule, the initial fees for certification
applications received in the 2004 and
2005 calendar years (for example,
$1,822 and $826, respectively, for landbased nonroad CI engines and marine
engines) are adjusted on an annual basis
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
based on several factors, including any
changes in the number of certificates in
the respective fee categories. Thus, the
number of certificates that EPA issues
for the engines covered by this final rule
will be included in the respective fee
categories when EPA conducts its
annual calculation for the purposes of
adjusting fees based on the existing
regulatory formula. Please note that the
fee amounts for calendar year 2006 have
slightly increased from the fee amounts
for the 2004 and 2005 calendar year
fees. See EPA’s Guidance Letter CCD–
05–05 at https://www.epa.gov/otaq/cert/
dearmfr/dearmfr.htm. Finally, EPA
believes it appropriate to commence the
collection of fees immediately for each
certification of conformity request once
the final rule becomes effective.
2. Owners and Operators
All engines and control devices must
be installed, configured, operated, and
maintained according to the
specifications and instructions provided
by the engine manufacturer. EPA has
also included the option for owners and
operators to follow procedures
developed by the owner or operator that
have been approved by the engine
manufacturer for cases where sitespecific conditions may require changes
to the manufacturer’s typical guidelines.
Other compliance requirements for
owners and operators of stationary CI
ICE depend on the displacement and
model year of the engine. Owners and
operators of pre-2007 model year
engines with a displacement less than
30 liters per cylinder and Tier 1 fire
pump engines can demonstrate
compliance by purchasing an engine
that is certified to meet the nonroad
emission standards for the model year
and maximum engine power of the
engine. Other information such as
performance test results for each
pollutant for a test conducted on a
similar engine; data from the engine
manufacturer; data from the control
device vendor; or conducting a
performance test can also be used to
demonstrate compliance with the
emission standards. The records which
indicate that the engine is complying
with the emission standards of the final
rule must be kept on file by the owner
or operator of the engine and be
available for inspection by the enforcing
agency. Engine manufacturers and/or
control device vendors may provide
such information at the time of sale.
Manufacturers that provide such
information to their customers may also
choose to place a label on the engine
that indicates the engine meets the
applicable standards for stationary CI
ICE under 40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
as long as the label does not violate or
otherwise interfere with other labels or
requirements mandated by other
regulations. If the owner or operator
chooses to conduct a performance test to
demonstrate compliance with the final
rule, the test must be conducted
according to the in-use testing
procedures of 40 CFR 1039, subpart F.
Starting with 2007 model year engines
with a displacement of less than 30
liters per cylinder, owners and operators
of engines that are not fire pump
engines are required to demonstrate
compliance by purchasing an engine
certified to meet the applicable emission
standard for the model year and
maximum engine power of the engine.
Certified fire pump engines will be
available between 2008 and 2011,
depending on the size of the engine. For
2007 model year and later fire pump
engines that are not required to be
certified, owners and operators can
demonstrate compliance using the
procedures specified for pre-2007 model
year engines. Beginning with the model
years shown in table 3 to the final rule,
owners and operators of fire pump
engines must purchase certified engines.
If in-use testing is conducted, the
owner and operator of engines with a
displacement of less than 30 liters per
cylinder would be required to meet notto-exceed (NTE) emission standards
instead of the standards in tables 1 and
2 of this preamble. Engines that are
complying with the emission standards
in 40 CFR part 1039 (Tier 4 standards)
must not exceed the NTE standards for
the same model year and maximum
engine power as required in 40 CFR
1039.101(e) and 40 CFR 1039.102(g)(1),
except as specified in 40 CFR
1039.104(d) starting when NTE
requirements take effect for nonroad
diesel engines under 40 CFR part 1039.
Engines that are complying with the
emission standards in 40 CFR 89.112
(Tier 2/3 standards), and engines that
are pre-2007 model year engines must
meet the NTE standards in Equation 1
of this preamble:
NTE = (STD) × (M)
(Eq. 1)
Where:
NTE = The NTE emission standard for
each pollutant.
STD = The certification emission
standard specified for each
pollutant in table 1 or 2 of this
preamble for the same model year
and maximum engine power.
M = 1.25
Alternatively, stationary CI ICE that
are complying with the emission
standards in 40 CFR 89.112 or that are
pre-2007 model year engines may use
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the testing procedures specified for
engines with a displacement of greater
than or equal to 30 liters per cylinder,
described in the next paragraph, instead
of the NTE provisions discussed above.
Owners and operators of stationary CI
ICE with a displacement of greater than
or equal to 30 liters per cylinder must
conduct an initial performance test to
demonstrate compliance with the
emissions reductions requirements,
establish operating parameters and
monitor operating parameters
continuously. Non-emergency engines
with a displacement of greater than or
equal to 30 liters per cylinder must also
conduct annual performance tests. The
NTE standards do not apply to engines
that have a displacement of greater than
or equal to 30 liters per cylinder.
Testing conducted on these engines
must be performed to demonstrate that
NOX and PM emission standards are
achieved, and the tests must be
conducted within 10 percent of 100
percent peak (or the highest achievable)
load.
G. What are the monitoring
requirements?
Owners and operators of stationary CI
ICE that are equipped with catalyzed
diesel particulate filters (CDPF) must
install a backpressure monitor that will
notify the operator when the high
backpressure limit of the engine is
approached. All emergency stationary
CI ICE must have a non-resettable hour
meter to track the number of hours
operated during any type of operation.
H. What are the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements?
The owner or operator of nonemergency stationary CI ICE that are
greater than 3,000 HP or with a
displacement of greater than or equal to
10 liters per cylinder, and nonemergency stationary CI ICE pre-2007
model year engines greater than 175 HP
and not certified, must submit an initial
notification. The initial notification
must contain information identifying
the owner or operator, the engine and
control device, and the fuel used. As
mentioned, engines that are not certified
have various options for demonstrating
initial compliance, which would be
documented in records available on-site.
Also, all owners and operators must
keep records of all information
necessary to demonstrate compliance
with the emission standards such as
records of all notifications submitted,
any maintenance conducted on the
engine, any performance tests
conducted on the engine (or
performance tests conducted on a
similar engine that is used to
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
ER11JY06.008
39160
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
demonstrate compliance), engine
manufacturer or control device vendor
information, etc. Owners and operators
of certified engines must keep records of
documentation from the manufacturer
that the engine is certified to meet the
emission standards. Owners and
operators of engines that are equipped
with CDPF must install a backpressure
monitor and are required to maintain
records of any corrective action taken
after the backpressure monitor has
notified the owner or operator that the
backpressure limit is approached. These
records must be available for viewing
upon request by the enforcing agency.
Owners and operators of emergency
engines are not required to submit
initial notifications. However, these
engines must have a non-resettable hour
meter. Owners and operators of
emergency engines are required to keep
records of their hours of operation.
Owners and operators must record the
time of operation of the engine and the
reason the engine was in operation
during that time.
III. Summary of Significant Changes
Since Proposal
Most of the rationale used to develop
the proposed rule remains the same for
the final rule. Therefore, the rationale
previously provided in the rule, as
proposed, is not repeated in the final
rule, and the rationale sections of the
rule, as proposed, should be referred to.
Changes that have been made to the rule
since proposal are discussed in this
section with rationale following in the
Summary of Responses to Major
Comments section.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
A. Applicability
The final rule includes an exemption
for engines used at test cells/stands.
The final rule also exempts area
sources from title V permit
requirements.
B. Fuel Requirements
The proposed rule required the same
fuel requirements for all engines, except
engines used in Guam, American
Samoa, or the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands. The final rule
does not require owners and operators
of stationary CI ICE with a displacement
of greater than or equal to 30 liters per
cylinder subject to the rule that use
diesel fuel to meet the 15 ppm fuel
sulfur requirements. Owners and
operators of these engines are subject to
the 500 ppm fuel requirements only,
starting October 1, 2007.
In addition, EPA received comments
on the proposal requesting that EPA
delay the sulfur requirements for diesel
fuel intended for stationary ICE in rural
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
areas of Alaska until 2010, consistent
with the approach that was expected to
be proposed for nonroad and highway
engines in rural Alaska. EPA believes it
is appropriate to address stationary,
highway and nonroad fuel requirements
in one rule where all issues can be
addressed and resolved. Therefore, on
October 13, 2005 (70 FR 59690), EPA
proposed to revise the provisions of 40
CFR part 69 (Special Exemptions from
the CAA) to delay low sulfur fuel
requirements for rural areas of Alaska
until December 1, 2010, except that
certain engines, including any 2011
model year and later stationary CI
engines operating in rural Alaska prior
to December 1, 2010, would be required
to meet the 15 ppm sulfur requirement
for diesel fuel. EPA has included a
special section in the final rule that
specifies that until December 1, 2010,
owners and operators of stationary CI
engines located in Alaska should refer
to 40 CFR part 69 to determine the
diesel fuel requirements applicable to
such engines.
In addition, the final regulations
include language that allows Alaska to
submit for EPA approval through
rulemaking process, by no later than
January 11, 2008, an alternative plan for
implementing the requirements of this
regulation for public-sector electrical
utilities located in rural areas of Alaska
not accessible by the Federal Aid
Highway System. The alternative plan
must be based on the requirements of
section 111 of the CAA including any
increased risks to human health and the
environment and must also be based on
the unique circumstances related to
remote power generation, climatic
conditions, and serious economic
impacts resulting from implementation
of 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart IIII.
EPA has included an option in the
final rule for owners and operators of
pre-2011 model year engines located in
remote areas of Alaska to petition the
Administrator to use any fuels mixed
with used oil that do not meet the fuel
requirements in § 60.4207 of the final
rule beyond the required fuel deadlines.
The owner or operator must show that
there is no other place to burn the used
oil. Each petition, if approved, is valid
for a period of up to 6 months.
EPA has clarified that the fuel
requirements in § 60.4207 of the final
rule only apply to stationary CI ICE that
are subject to the rule, and do not apply
to new engines manufactured prior to
April 1, 2006, unless they have been
modified or reconstructed after July 15,
2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39161
C. Maintenance and Testing
The proposed rule limited the use of
emergency engines for the purpose of
maintenance and testing to 30 hours per
year. This limit has been increased in
the final rule to 100 hours per year. EPA
has also included a provision that
allows anyone to petition the
Administrator for additional hours,
beyond the allowed 100 hours per year,
if such additional hours should prove to
be necessary for maintenance and
testing reasons. EPA will not require a
petition for additional hours if the hours
beyond 100 hours per year for
maintenance and testing purposes are
mandated by regulation such as State or
local requirements.
D. Emission Standards
The emission standards for engines
with a displacement of greater than or
equal to 30 liters per cylinder in the
final rule are different than in the rule,
as proposed. EPA received comments
that the proposed PM standards and the
proposed NOX g/KW-hr standard were
not achievable. EPA revised the
standards for the final rule and believes
the final levels are achievable through
the use of on-engine controls,
aftertreatment, and lower sulfur fuel.
E. Recordkeeping
For emergency engines, EPA proposed
that owners and operators record the
use of the engine during non-emergency
operation. These hours would be
recorded through the non-resettable
hour meter. Based on comments
received on the rule, as proposed, EPA
has determined that it is appropriate to
require records of all operation,
including hours operated during nonemergencies and hours operated during
emergencies. The owner must also
record the time of operation of the
engine and the reason the engine was in
operation during that time.
IV. Summary of Responses to Major
Comments
A more detailed summary of
comments and EPA’s responses can be
found in the Summary of Public
Comments document, which is available
from the rulemaking docket (see
ADDRESSES section).
A. Applicability/Effective Date
Comment: One commenter expressed
that the 6-month installation date
deadlines in § 60.4208 of the proposed
rule are problematic and unworkable.
The period of time between the
manufacture of a stationary CI engine
and its installation is regularly in excess
of 6 months. The NSPS should
incorporate the relevant anti-stockpiling
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
39162
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
from the nonroad rule (40 CFR
89.1003(b)(4)) instead.
Another commenter said that
§ 60.4208(a) of the proposed rule does
not exclude fire pumps (emergency CI
ICE), but § 60.4208(c) through (f) of the
proposed rule does. A 6-month time
limitation will become problematic, the
commenter said. Due to construction
project complexities, size and delays,
NFPA certified fire pump engines may
not be installed for as long as 1 year
after the date of sale by the NFPA
certifier. The NFPA certified fire pump
engines are typically not purchased for
inventory, and therefore, are self
regulated by the date of manufacturer.
The commenter stated that fire pump
engines should be exempt from this
fixed time restriction.
Response: EPA agrees with the
commenters that the 6-month deadline
for installing engines of a previous tier
is not long enough to allow for the time
that typically elapses between order and
installation of an engine and may
prevent engine manufacturers from
using up existing inventories of engines.
Therefore, EPA increased the time limit
to 24 months after the beginning of the
model year. EPA has also included antistockpiling provisions similar to those
used for nonroad engines to prohibit
stockpiling of previous tier engines in
the final rule. Also, EPA was concerned
about imports of non-compliant
stationary CI engines and has made it
clear in § 60.4208 of the final rule that
the limitations of that section apply to
imports of engines with a displacement
of less than 30 liters per cylinder also.
Engines with a displacement greater
than or equal to 30 liters per cylinder
are not included in this provision since
compliance with the emission standards
for those engines can only be
demonstrated through on-site stack
testing. Finally, EPA has exempted
stationary emergency fire pump engines
from the deadlines in § 60.4208(a) and
(b) of the final rule to account for the
fact that fire pumps have different
timing requirements for the emission
standards they have to meet.
Comment: One commenter requested
that the rule exempt area sources from
the requirement to have a title V permit
solely because of the presence of an
affected engine.
Response: Section 502(a) of the CAA
specifies the sources that are required to
obtain operating permits under title V.
These sources include (1) any affected
source subject to the acid deposition
provisions of title IV of the CAA, (2) any
major source, (3) any source required to
have a permit under parts C or D of title
I of the CAA, (4) ‘‘any other source
(including an area source) subject to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
standards under section 111 (new
source performance standards) or 112
(national emissions standards for
hazardous air pollutants),’’ and (5) any
other stationary source in a category
designated by regulations promulgated
by the Administrator.
Section 502(a) of the CAA also
provides that the Administrator may
‘‘promulgate regulations to exempt one
or more source categories (in whole or
in part) from the requirements of this
subsection if the Administrator finds
that compliance with such requirements
is impracticable, infeasible, or
unnecessarily burdensome on such
categories, except that the Administrator
may not exempt any major source from
such requirements.’’ EPA has exempted
many area sources subject to section 111
or 112 standards from title V
requirements in prior rulemakings, in
particular see a recent final rule, 70 FR
75320, December 19, 2005, that provides
additional background information and
rationale for such exemptions for a large
number of area sources subject to CAA
section 112 standards.
In the case of affected stationary CI
engines located at area sources, EPA
believes compliance with permit
requirements under title V would be
impracticable, infeasible and
unnecessarily burdensome for the
reasons explained below.
First, title V permits would be
unnecessarily burdensome for area
sources subject to this final rule because
title V would not result in significant
improvements to compliance with the
CAA section 111(b) standard for the area
sources. (The term ‘‘title V permits’’
used here refers to permits issued under
40 CFR parts 70 or 71 by either a State
or local agency or EPA.) For a great
number of these area sources, these
engines are the only emission source
and the owner/operator (often a hospital
or a school) will not be at all familiar
with the requirements for permits. To
demonstrate compliance with these
section 111(b) standards, the final rule
requires the owner or operator of the
area source to purchase a certified
stationary CI engine. Certification that
the engine meets the emission reduction
requirements of this final rule is done
by the manufacturer of the engine,
rather than the area source that owns or
operates the engine. This strategy places
a significant amount of responsibility
for compliance with the standard on the
manufacturer, compared to many other
emission standards that place the
compliance responsibility on the owner
or operator. EPA believes this strategy is
the most effective way to ensure that the
standard is met during the useful life of
the engine. Also, title V would not
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
result in significant improvements to
compliance with the standard for these
area sources because the section 111(b)
standard itself contains adequate
compliance requirements for these area
sources, consistent with the CAA,
without relying on title V.
Second, title V would impose certain
burdens and costs on area sources
subject to this final rule that EPA does
not believe are justified when compared
to the potential for title V permits to
improve compliance with the CAA
section 111(b) standards for such
sources. This is so because EPA believes
the costs and burdens of title V permits
for the typical area sources subject to
this final rule would be significant. This
assessment is not based on any
particular empirical data or study but on
a review of the types of stand-alone area
sources that would be subject to the
final rule, for example, small farming
operations using diesel engines for
irrigation purposes and small businesses
and residential homeowners using
diesel engines for back-up electrical
power generation. (See current ICR for
40 CFR part 70, EPA ICR # 1587.06 and
OMB control number 2060–0243 for
EPA’s best estimate of the burdens and
costs of title V for sources subject to 40
CFR part 70 on a national, aggregate
basis.) Also, as explained above, EPA’s
judgment is that requiring operating
permits for these area sources would not
result in significant improvements to
compliance over that already required
by this final rule. Thus, the burdens and
cost of title V permits for these area
sources would be significant, and in any
case, they will be unnecessary and not
justified, when compared to the low
potential for title V permits to improve
compliance, consistent with the
‘‘unnecessarily burdensome’’ criterion
of section 502(a) of the CAA.
The strategy of this final rule,
requiring the manufacture of cleaner
burning emission sources
(manufacturer-based controls), has been
employed in other CAA section 111
standards, for example, the NSPS for
new residential woodstoves (subpart
AAA of 40 CFR part 60). We exempted
area sources subject to the woodstove
NSPS in the final rule for 40 CFR part
70 (57 FR 32250, July 21, 1992) for
reasons similar to those we describe
today for stationary CI IC engines. (40
CFR 70.3(b)(4) and 40 CFR 71.3(b)(4).)
Thus, we have decided to exempt area
sources subject to this final rule from
title V operating permit requirements
under 40 CFR part 70 and 40 CFR part
71, and we have changed the
applicability language in the final
regulations to specify this. Under this
approach, title V exemptions are
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
allowed for an area source, provided the
area source is not required to obtain a
permit under 40 CFR 70.3(a) or 40 CFR
71.3(a) for another reason, such as when
the source becomes a major source. Also
note that this exemption only affects
whether an area source is required to
obtain an operating permit, it has no
bearing on any other requirements of
this final rule.
B. Modeling Mobile Source Program
Comment: Two commenters stated
that the proposed standard layers
mobile source requirements with similar
40 CFR part 60 requirements. These
mobile legacy provisions, such as the
General Provisions and testing
requirements for nonroad engines, are
foreign to stationary source operators.
Two commenters said that a rule
modeled after mobile standards is
unnecessarily complex and includes
requirements that are inconsistent with
the legacy of stationary sources affected
under 40 CFR part 60. One commenter
was concerned that an array of
unforeseen implementation issues could
arise in translating the mobile source
criteria to stationary sources.
One commenter said that the limits
are based upon the engine model year
and could lead to confusion. Limits for
stationary sources have in the past been
based upon the date of construction or
operation. Two adjacent facilities may
install identical engines manufactured
by different companies and are of
different model years. These engines
could be subject to different limits. The
facility that is subject to the more
stringent limits may challenge the
fairness of the limits and the cost to
comply with the more stringent limits.
This can be avoided by establishing
limits based upon the date a source
commences operation. The commenter
added that compliance with NSPS
limits is primarily based upon
manufacturer guarantees. This is a new
regulatory strategy for stationary
sources. The New York (NY)
Department of Environmental
Conservation (DEC) issues permits to
facility owners/operators, which are
contracts whereby the permittee agrees
to comply with all applicable
provisions. Manufacturers are not
parties to permits issued by the NY
DEC. Any violation of a permit
condition is, therefore, the
responsibility of the permittee. Any
enforcement action initiated by the NY
DEC would be against the permittee, not
the manufacturer. The NY DEC’s
distributed generation rule (6 NYCRR
part 222) is structured in this way. If an
engine is not in compliance with the
limits, the owner/operator may have
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
legal recourse against the manufacturer
depending upon the conditions of a
warranty. The NY DEC, not being a
party to a warranty, would not have
legal recourse against the manufacturer.
This commenter recommended that the
owner/operator be responsible for
compliance with emission limits under
the NSPS.
Response: EPA disagrees with these
commenters on certain issues. EPA
agrees that aligning the NSPS with
mobile standards and placing significant
responsibility with manufacturer is
somewhat unusual, but it is not an
unprecedented regulatory strategy for
stationary sources (40 CFR part 60,
subpart AAA, Standards of Performance
for New Residential Wood Heaters).
EPA has determined that it is
appropriate to develop a regulatory
strategy for internal combustion engines
that is generally directed towards engine
manufacturers. EPA recognizes that the
proposed approach is different than the
strategy typically followed in NSPS
rulemaking for stationary sources,
which is often aimed at the owners and
operators of stationary sources.
However, EPA has worked with engine
manufacturers throughout the rule
development process, and it was
determined that developing a rule that
will affect engines at the manufacturing
level, will achieve the best system of
emission reduction while taking into
account the cost of achieving such
reductions. The certification of nonroad
diesel engines is a well-established
program that engine manufacturers are
familiar with. Engine manufacturers
have indicated that they often design
and manufacture the same engines for
nonroad use as for stationary use. As
mentioned in the preamble to the
proposed rule, the vast majority of
stationary CI engines are consumer
products produced in mass quantities.
Internal combustion engines have
traditionally been regulated through the
manufacturer for purposes of meeting
mobile source regulations.
Manufacturers have extensive
experience with complying with such
standards. It is also simpler, more
reliable, and comparatively inexpensive
to regulate stationary CI engines
employing the same approach as for
mobile sources than to create a new
approach based on testing by every
owner and operator.
Moreover, EPA believes this method
of regulation will be much easier for
owners and operators (represented by
the commenters) than a set of
regulations aimed primarily at owners
and operators. The commenters note
that the proposed standards layer
mobile source requirements on 40 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39163
part 60 requirements, but EPA’s mobile
source regulations are directed towards
manufacturers, so they will not
substantially affect owners and
operators. In general, owners and
operators will be required to purchase
certified engines, which are likely to be
the only new engines available, since
manufacturers will not be able to sell
uncertified engines. This would seem to
be preferable from an owner/operator’s
perspective than having to individually
test all of its new engines initially and
periodically thereafter to show
compliance with the standards, and to
engage in all of the other compliance
procedures normally required for
stationary sources. While EPA
acknowledges that this approach is one
with which stationary source owners
and operators may not be accustomed,
EPA believes that this approach will
provide less burden to owners and
operators than a more standard NSPS
approach. Regarding the comments from
NY DEC, EPA believes that because the
owner/operator will be purchasing
certified engines, it will know prior to
purchase and installation the emission
limits and costs for the engine. A
manufacturer would not be selling
identical engines for different model
years unless the engine met the
standards for both model years, so there
would be no increased cost for the user.
Unlike in other regulations, the
emission-related costs are known from
the outset, because they are inherent in
the cost of the certified engine. The
NSPS should have no effect on the
manner in which NY DEC ensures
compliance with its distributed
generation rule. However, as discussed
below, owners and operators do have
responsibilities under the NSPS,
compliance with which can be readily
determined. EPA agrees that it would be
appropriate to specify what parts of the
General Provisions apply to engines
subject to subpart IIII of 40 CFR part 60.
In the final rule, EPA has included a
table listing which General Provisions
from 40 CFR part 60, subpart A, apply
to stationary CI engines subject to this
subpart.
C. Fuel Requirements
Comment: One commenter stated that
no operating experience currently exists
for engines with a displacement of
greater than or equal to 30 liters per
cylinder with 15 ppm sulfur fuel, and
therefore, an alternative should be
worked out. The use of ULSD may have
impacts on safety, reliability and
durability of the stationary engine. At
the current stage of technology, engine
manufacturers will not be able to
guarantee an engine operating
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
39164
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
exclusively on ULSD. According to the
European Union (EU) Directive 1999/
32/EC, the maximum sulfur content of
heavy fuel oil is a maximum of 1 weight
percent (10,000 ppm) from January 1,
2003, and in gas oil a maximum of 0.1
weight percent (1,000 ppm) from
January 1, 2008. These fuels can be used
in stationary CI engine plants without
installed flue-gas desulfurization.
According to the EU 2001/80/EC
Directive, a maximum of 0.5 weight
percent sulfur (850 milligrams per
Normal (273.15 °Kelvin, 101.3 kilo
Pascal (kPa)) cubic meters (mg/Nm3)
SO2 at 3 percent oxygen (O2) and 280
mg/Nm3 SO2 at 15 percent O2 fuel oil
can be used in 50 to 100 megawatt (MW)
boiler plants. Large CI engines are
designed to operate on heavy fuel oil
and the use of ultra clean light fuel oils
(with different density, viscosity, etc.,
properties) may cause operation
problems. The commenter requested
that for large engines the requirement
should be equivalent to 500 ppm after
2010 on the U.S. mainland. The
commenter also stated it was reasonable
for EPA to exempt Guam, American
Samoa and the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands from fuel
limits.
Another commenter expressed that
additional time may be necessary to
phase in the use of ULSD with respect
to new engines with a displacement of
30 liters per cylinder or greater.
Response: EPA requested comments
on whether ownes and operators of
stationary CI engines with a
displacement of greater than or equal to
30 liters per cylinder should be required
to use ULSD fuel. There is no
information regarding the effect of
burning 15 ppm sulfur fuel in stationary
CI engines with a displacement of
greater than or equal to 30 liters per
cylinder and operators of these engines
have expressed concerns with burning
such fuel. Manufacturers of engines
with high displacement have told EPA
that there is a large variety of fuels used
in these engines and that the fuel used
can contain a high sulfur content. The
fuels used in large displacement engines
are of a different grade than the fuels
used in nonroad engines. Information
EPA has received indicates that engines
with a displacement of greater than or
equal to 30 liters per cylinder are often
designed to operate on residual fuels
containing up to 5 percent sulfur, but
that these engines can also operate on
fuels with lower fuel content. Further
information on this subject can be found
in the docket (EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–
0029–0146). EPA believes it would be
inappropriate to require owners and
operators of these engines to use ULSD
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
as the impacts of using such fuel are
unknown. However, EPA does believe it
is appropriate to require these engines
to utilize fuel containing 500 ppm sulfur
or less, consistent with the commenter’s
statement. The final rule has been
written to require owners and operators
of stationary CI engines with a
displacement of greater than or equal to
30 liters per cylinder to use 500 ppm
sulfur fuel starting October 1, 2007.
Owners and operators of stationary CI
engines with a displacement of greater
than or equal to 30 liters per cylinder
are not required to use 15 ppm sulfur
fuel, but must use 500 ppm fuel from
October 1, 2007, and beyond.
Comment: One commenter expressed
that the proposed fuel requirements
would be burdensome to some facilities
that store and use large inventories of
diesel fuel. To comply with the
proposed fuel requirements, an owner
or operator of stationary CI engines with
large fuel inventories may have to
dilute/blend existing diesel fuel
inventories with fuel that is virtually
sulfur-free prior to each compliance
date in § 60.4207 of the proposed rule,
and sample/analyze the blended fuel for
sulfur content, and cetane index or
aromatic content to document
compliance with the fuel content
requirements. Sources with large fuel
inventories may require dilution
quantities that exceed the existing
storage tank capacities, and diluting/
blending would be an expensive task.
Diluting/blending fuel to meet these
requirements would require the
procurement of diesel fuel that has a
sulfur content and cetane index or
aromatic content that would be much
more stringent than the specified fuel
sulfur content standards. As an
alternative, owners/operators would
have to deplete existing diesel fuel
inventories completely prior to each
compliance date and then purchase fuel
that meets the requirements of 40 CFR
80.510(a) and (b) for just-in-time fuel
delivery prior to each compliance date.
This alternative is not reasonable for
owners/operators that operate 24 hours
a day. Also, depleting inventories to
zero potentially would cause owners/
operators to have to clean/remove tank
bottoms to prevent fouling of fuel lines
and equipment, and to have to dispose
of off-specification diesel fuel,
producing additional costs. The
commenter requested that EPA include
a grandfather clause that would allow
owners/operators to continue to use up
existing fuel inventories after October 1,
2007, and October 1, 2010.
Alternatively, EPA could revise
§ 60.4207(a) and (b) of the proposed rule
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
by replacing the word ‘‘use’’ with
‘‘purchase.’’
Response: EPA believes it is providing
sufficient time for owners and operators
to switch to using lower sulfur fuel.
Substantial amounts of fuel meeting the
fuel requirements will be available in
the years and months prior to
implementation of the fuel
requirements. However, EPA
understands that there may be cases
where sources may be unable to use up
existing non-compliant fuel inventories
prior to the fuel compliance dates of the
rule. EPA does not think it would be
appropriate to include an open-ended
provision allowing owners and
operators to use up existing noncompliant fuel inventories after October
1, 2007 and October 1, 2010. Also, EPA
does not believe it would be appropriate
to use the word ‘‘purchase’’ instead of
‘‘use’’ in § 60.4207 of the rule. A more
reasonable provision, which takes into
account that there may be varying
volumes of existing fuels from site to
site, would be for the owners and
operators to petition the Administrator
for additional time beyond the schedule
set in the final rule to use up existing
non-compliant fuels. EPA believes that
a case-by-case approach to dealing with
existing fuel inventories is more
appropriate and will incorporate the
uniqueness of each source’s fuel
inventory situation. EPA has
incorporated a provision into the final
rule that allows owners and operators
that have stationary CI engines subject
to the rule to petition the Administrator
for additional time to use up existing
fuel inventories. If approved, the
petition is valid for a period of up to 6
months. If additional time is needed
beyond that, the owner or operator
would have to submit another petition
to the Administrator. Also, EPA does
not believe such a provision should be
included for engines built after 2011 as
these stationary CI engines will require
the use of ULSD in order to operate
properly. Therefore, the final rule
includes the provision to petition the
Administrator to use up existing noncompliant fuel for a period of 6 months
only for pre-2011 model year stationary
CI engines.
D. Maintenance and Testing
Comment: Several commenters said
that the testing and maintenance
allowance for emergency engines in the
proposed rule was not sufficient. Many
commenters recommended revising the
definition of emergency engines to be
consistent with 40 CFR part 63, subpart
ZZZZ, for stationary RICE. Commenters
recommended various maintenance and
testing allowances. One commenter
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
recommended a minimum of 8 hours
per month or 96 hours per year. One
commenter encouraged EPA to either
exempt hospitals, categorically from the
restrictions, or apply a reasonable
allowance of combined total operations
of all emergency generators per hospital
facility to 2,000 hours per year. Four
commenters recommended that EPA
specify 100 hours per year instead, as a
maximum for maintenance and
readiness testing. Some commenters
recommended that regulatory agencies
could establish site-specific limits for
maintenance checks and readiness
testing. One commenter recommended
allowing hospitals to petition for an
exemption raising the limit beyond 100
hours as a permanent exemption or a
one-time exemption. One commenter
recommended limiting maintenance and
testing activities to 78 hours per year.
One commenter said that the operation
of an emergency engine should be at the
discretion of the owner or operator,
based on the engine manufacturer’s
recommendations and any applicable
health and safety codes. The commenter
believed this requirement is
unnecessary because non-emergency
engines will be allowed to operate
without any hourly limitations.
Response: As summarized above and
in more detail in the Summary of Public
Comments document, EPA received
several comments on the issue of
maintenance and testing of stationary
emergency engines. EPA proposed to
limit the time emergency engines spend
during maintenance and testing to 30
hours per year, based on information
available at the time of proposal
indicating that 30 hours per year would
be sufficient to address operation for
such activities. For example, NFPA
requirements stipulated 30 minutes per
week (27 hours per year) for
maintenance and testing purposes to
ensure that the engine would respond
properly in the event of an emergency.
A survey conducted by the California
(CA) Air Resources Board (ARB)
indicated that emergency engines spend
on average of about 30 hours per year
for all operation. The proposed limit of
30 hours per year for maintenance and
testing for stationary emergency CI
engines was also consistent with the CA
Airborne Toxic Control Measure
(ATCM). Since the proposal of the rule,
CA increased the maintenance and
testing limit based on new information
it had received, which indicated that
more frequent testing was required by
certain healthcare regulatory bodies.
Local air districts in CA are allowed to
approve additional hours of operation
for maintenance and testing beyond 30
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
hours per year, and the ATCM also
includes a sliding scale based on the PM
levels the engine emits, of up to 100
hours per year. Considering the extent
to which commenters provided
information indicating that the
proposed 30 hours per year allowance
was not sufficient for most emergency
engines, EPA has determined that it is
appropriate to allow emergency engines
to operate 100 hours per year during
maintenance and testing. It is crucial to
allow owners and operators of
emergency engines to sufficiently test
and maintain their emergency engines
to ensure the engines will respond
properly and as expected during an
emergency situation. The engines must
respond without failure and without
lengthy periods of startup and adequate
testing and maintenance must therefore
be performed. Based on the comments
received, EPA believes that 100 hours
per year is a sufficient amount to ensure
readiness of emergency engines in most
cases. The final rule has been written to
limit operation of emergency engines to
100 hours per year during maintenance
and testing operation. In addition, EPA
believes that there may be cases where
it is necessary for an owner or operator
of emergency engines to operate their
emergency engines beyond 100 hours
per year to ensure their engines will
respond as needed during an
emergency. Additionally, Federal, State
or local safety standards may require
maintenance and testing beyond 100
hours per year. Therefore, EPA has
incorporated a provision into the final
rule that allows owners and operators to
petition the Administrator for approval
to operate their emergency engines for
more than 100 hours per year for
maintenance and testing purposes. If a
sufficient case is presented, the
Administrator may approve such
petitions for additional time to conduct
maintenance checks and readiness
testing to ensure that emergency engines
can be used for their intended
application during emergency
situations. A petition is not required if
an owner or operator can show that
operation beyond 100 hours is required
by regulation such as State or local
requirements. EPA does not believe it is
generally appropriate to allow unlimited
hours for maintenance and testing, or
hours well in excess of 100 hours, as
suggested by some commenters, given
the substantial emissions that can occur
from these engines during their
operation and the ability of owners and
operators to meet their maintenance and
testing needs under the final provisions.
The California ARB presented in Table
IV–1 of their Staff Report from 2003 that
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39165
PM and NOX emissions from emergency
standby engines in 2002 were 0.3 and
6.4 tons per day, respectively. The
maintenance and testing allowance in
the final rule would include training for
and simulation of emergency situations
and EPA believes the 100 hours per year
would be sufficient to account for such
operation. Documented engine repair
would also be considered maintenance
and testing and the change from 30 to
100 hours per year should provide
enough hours to make necessary repairs.
Finally, peak shaving is not considered
emergency use and EPA has clarified
this in the definition of emergency
engine in the final rule.
E. Emission Standards
Comment: One commenter stated that
as was the case with the nonroad
engines from which stationary CI
engines are derived, it remains the case
that less stringent standards are
necessary for non-generator engines
greater than 750 HP.
One commenter said that EPA should
set stringent NOX emissions standards
for all engines greater than 750 HP that
are based on the use of add-on control
technologies. The commenter estimated
that stationary diesel engines greater
than 750 HP make up about 20 percent
of the total stationary engine
population, but account for more than
half the total emissions of NOX. The
commenter has seen enough successful
examples of the use of selective catalytic
reduction (SCR) to control NOX
emissions from stationary engines to
conclude that EPA should base its NOX
emissions standards for these engines
on the use of add-on controls. EPA
describes in docket information that
SCR has been successfully installed in
several applications based on State and
vendor information. Several additional
add-on NOX controls that are under
development are described in the docket
as well; NOX adsorbers, ozone injection
and lean NOX catalysts. While these
technologies are not commercially
available yet, they could become viable
options within the timeframe of these
standards. The commenter believed the
current use of SCR and the other
available options for add-on NOX
control support the more stringent
standards. The commenter is not aware
of any special issues with add-on
controls on non-generator stationary
engines. The commenter believed the
issues would be no different than those
associated with stationary generator sets
and, therefore, saw no reason to set
more lenient standards.
One commenter believed that NOX
standards for non-generator, stationary
engines with HP ratings of greater than
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
39166
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
750 should be equivalent to NOX
standards proposed for generators.
Selective catalytic reduction systems
have already been installed on
stationary engines in this size range and
can provide high efficiency NOX
reductions in a cost effective manner.
The commenter believed that
installation issues with SCR on nongenerator engines are no different than
those associated with generator engines.
One commenter strongly urged EPA to
set aftertreatment forcing NOX standards
for all non-emergency engines with a
displacement of less than 10 liters per
cylinder and greater than 750 HP. The
rationale for setting less stringent
standards for nonroad engines other
than generator sets were concerns about
designing NOX adsorbers for the space
constraints and physical stresses
associated with mobile heavy
equipment. These conditions do not
apply to stationary engines. In the July
2004 nonroad rulemaking, EPA noted
the use of SCR on stationary engines as
a rationale for aftertreatment forcing
NOX standards for mobile generator set
engines.
Regarding EPA’s request for
comments on whether the generator
standards for NOX should be applied for
non-emergency engines greater than 750
HP, one commenter believed that the
non-emergency generator engines
should be limited to the same levels of
emissions as other available ways to
generate electricity from fossil fuel. The
commenter recommended that limits for
engines greater than 750 HP be as
stringent as limits for non-emergency
engines in sizes between 75 HP and 750
HP, because the larger engines should
be able to achieve the same limit as
smaller engines, and there is sufficient
time to transfer technology to engines
greater than 750 HP. If a large engine
cannot achieve comparable emission
levels, then cleaner equipment, such as
turbines, should be used.
Two commenters made the comment
that the requirement for add-on controls
for engines above 750 HP with a
displacement below 10 liters per
cylinder should apply solely to
continuously operating non-emergency
generators.
Response: EPA proposed emission
standards for non-emergency nongenerators above 750 HP that were not
based on the use of add-on controls for
NOX and were less stringent than the
proposed standards for generator sets
above 750 HP. These standards were
consistent with nonroad standards for
the same size engines. EPA solicited
comments on this issue in the preamble
to the proposed rule and received the
comments as summarized above. Based
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
on available information and comments
received on this issue, EPA still believes
it is appropriate to distinguish between
non-generators and generators when
finalizing standards for non-emergency
stationary CI engines above 750 HP.
EPA did not receive any specific
information or data demonstrating that
the standards applicable to generator
sets are feasible for engines above 750
HP that are not generator sets. Engine
manufacturers have repeatedly
expressed that less stringent standards
are necessary for non-generator set
engines greater than 750 HP. Engine
manufacturers have also repeatedly
expressed the need to have standards for
stationary engines that are consistent
with the standards for nonroad engines.
No change has been made to the final
rule, which includes, as proposed,
emission standards consistent with
nonroad standards. The standards
distinguish between non-generator sets
and generator sets, and require less
stringent levels for non-emergency
engines that are not generator sets,
based on improved combustion systems
and engine-based NOX control
technologies. (It should be noted that
the PM standards for engines above 750
HP, both for generators and nongenerators, will likely require
particulate traps.)
Comment: As summarized in more
detail in the Summary of Public
Comments document, EPA received
several comments on the proposed
standards for engines with a
displacement of greater than or equal to
30 liters per cylinder. One commenter
said that the NOX standards for these
engines would incur significant costs for
the owner and operator, and for
emergency engines make it impossible
to operate the unit reliably when
actually needed. The cost of installing
and maintaining an SCR system for large
CI engines is outrageously high,
especially for applications in Alaska,
according to the commenter. These
control systems are only marginally cost
effective for Alaska units that are meant
to be operated continuously. The cost of
SCR controls for emergency units
outweighs the benefit of having large
reliable emergency power available. A
recent prevention of significant
deterioration project rejected SCR due to
high costs. Selective catalytic reduction
subsystems must be kept instantly ready
over a long period of time in standby
mode. One important aspect is having
the urea/water mixture heated to
prevent freeze up during extremely low
temperatures. The system is not simple
and operators/mechanics have to be
well trained. In most areas of Alaska,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
such skilled labor is not available.
Unless such large units are simple to
maintain/operate, they will quickly fall
into disrepair or become unusable in an
emergency. For emergency engines, the
technology that is proven to have the
highest reliability while in standby
mode should be used. Fuel Injection
Timing Retard (FITR) is the technology.
It reduces NOX by 15 to 20 percent, and
has been demonstrated as the most cost
effective for arctic conditions. FITR
technology should also be allowed for
engines with a displacement of greater
than 10 liters per cylinder unless/until
manufacturers establish a proven record
of reliable readiness from cold start
conditions. This may require delay of
emission control requirements for an
additional 3 years beyond current
implementation dates.
This commenter also said that the PM
limits in the proposed rule for engines
with a displacement of greater than or
equal to 30 liters per cylinder are
unrealistic, and there are no current
control technologies that are ‘‘available’’
to meet these standards. There have
been no applications of electrostatic
precipitators (ESP) to stationary sources
in the U.S. to date (based on RACT/
BACT/LAER Clearinghouse, September
1, 2005). A currently available
technology, particulate filter traps, is
suited to these large units, although PM
removal is less than 60 percent. The
commenter noted that PM emissions
will already be reduced considerably by
the use of low sulfur diesel (LSD) and
ULSD. When the reduction from using
low sulfur fuel is considered, an
additional 50 percent overall reduction
from particulate trap technology will
meet EPA’s goal of reducing PM
emissions nationwide. Requiring the use
of ESP for emergency units undermines
unit reliability and would increase unit
size. Approximately 10 percent of the
power generated by an emergency CI
ICE would be used solely to power an
ESP. This would cause all such
emergency units to be resized at an
increased capacity. The commenter
recommended a 50 percent PM
reduction or an emission limit of 0.15 g/
KW-hr (0.113 g/HP-hr).
Another commenter provided several
comments on the proposed standards
for engines with high displacement. The
commenter stated that environmental
impacts and cost effects have not been
evaluated and efficient add-on
abatement techniques (SCR for NOX,
etc.) will always be needed as a result
of the proposal. Only a small number of
large CI ICE are sold per year to the U.S.
and, therefore, one can forecast that the
environmental impact of these engines
with respect to the total emissions in the
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
U.S. is small. The commenter said that
in the U.S. territories there are several
of these engines, e.g., in Puerto Rico
there is a 20 MW electric (MWe) plant
and in Guam there is an 80 MWe plant.
The proposed limits will raise the
electricity produced in these power
plants considerably. This might have
impacts on the small governmental
jurisdiction area flexibility and have
significant adverse affect on the supply
of energy. This would be in
contradiction to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and Executive Order
13211: Actions Concerning Regulations
that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use. The commenter
said that the proposed NOX limit of 0.4
g/KW-hr (0.30 g/HP-hr) equates to about
50 mg/Nm3 (at 15 percent oxygen (O2))
and is very strict. This limit is much
stricter than World Bank Guidelines or
the United Kingdom (UK) limits as
referred to in the proposed text. The
World Bank NOX limit for non degraded
air-sheds is 2,000 milligram per normal
cubic meter (mg/Nm3) and in degraded
air-sheds 400 mg/Nm3 (at 15 percent O2)
(about 3.1 g/KW-hr). In the UK, the NOX
limits are: 1,300/1,400 mg/Nm3 (at 15
percent O2) (about 10.1/10.9 g/KW-hr)
(light fuel/heavy fuel oils) for plants less
than 50 MW and 200–300 mg/Nm3 (at
15 percent O2) (about 1.6–2.3 g/KW-hr)
for oil fired plants greater than 50 MW.
Extensive research and development
work with NOX emissions from large
liquid fired CI ICE has reduced
emissions remarkably by primary
measures (typically 30 to 35 percent)
during the last decade. Primary methods
are low NOX combustion focusing on
optimizing: Closing timing of inlet
valve, design of fuel injection
equipment on the engine, new camshaft,
etc. The proposed limit means in
practice that SCR is always needed.
Selective catalytic reduction needs a
reagent aqueous urea/ammonia or pure
ammonia to work, and lack of the
reagent delivery infrastructure in certain
areas will make the proper use of SCR
impossible. In order to give industry an
incentive to develop new cost-effective
primary methods and to continue the
positive development in the past
decade, the proposed limit should be
more realistic based on the zoning
approach (attainment/non-attainment
area, mainland U.S./other areas). This
commenter made some
recommendations for acceptable NOX
and PM emission limits, which can be
found in the Summary of Public
Comments document. The commenter
stated that the proposed PM limit of
0.12 g/KW-hr (0.09 g/HP-hr) equals
about 16 mg/Nm3 (at 15 percent O2).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
This is a very strict limit, much stricter
than the British and World Bank limits,
which are 50 mg/Nm3 (at 15 percent O2)
(about 0.38 g/KW-hr) for large CI plants
and 100 mg/Nm3 (at 15 percent O2)
(about 0.75 g/KW-hr) for smaller CI
plants. The ESP is bulky and has a high
investment cost. In the Integrated
Pollution Prevention and Control
Reference Document on Best Available
Techniques for Large Combustion Power
Plants (BREF) document for large
combustion installations, it states that
‘‘Due to the different temperature and
oxygen content of the diesel flue-gas,
the electrical properties of the diesel
particulates (e.g., resistivity, etc.,) are
different compared to particulates from
a boiler flue-gas, and proper testing of
the ESP (electrical precipitator) is
needed to commercial release.’’ Only a
few CI plants are equipped with ESP,
and the technical availability of ESP
needs to be evaluated case-by-case. In
the European Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control, the best
available technique is considered to be
the use of low ash and low sulfur fuel.
Particulate matter limits range from 30
to 50 mg/Nm3 (at 15 percent O2) (about
0.23 to 0.38 g/KW-hr) depending on
whether heavy or light fuel oil is used.
The commenter recommended PM
limits in line with the EU BREF
document for large CI ICE plant stations
(greater than 50 MW). For smaller CI ICE
plants, the commenter recommended a
PM limit according to the UK approach.
One commenter said that EPA must
require stringent PM emissions limits
for engines with a displacement of
greater than or equal to 30 liters per
cylinder. Particulate matter emissions
from stationary diesel engines are
associated with extremely serious health
impacts, including premature mortality
and cancer. It would be clearly arbitrary
and capricious for EPA to exempt the
very largest engines, which it recognizes
as operating for thousands of hours per
year, from protective control
requirements for PM emissions. EPA is
correct in its assessment that the cost of
SCR to reduce NOX emissions from
these engines is justified because they
are so large and because the cost of SCR
would be manageable in comparison to
the cost of the engines themselves.
Similarly, the size of these engines and
the hazard posed by their emissions
compels EPA to require them to achieve
PM reductions that are at least as
protective, if not greater than, those for
smaller engines. EPA’s proposal for
these very large engines fails to meet the
most basic requirement of section 111 of
the CAA, that stringent emissions
standards be applied to all sources
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39167
within the designated category. There is
no evidence that a thorough technical
analysis of cost or feasibility was
performed for these large engines. EPA
does not explain why particulate filters
could not be developed to apply to these
engines. Nor does it explain why ESP,
the technology on which the 60 percent
control requirement is based, could not
be designed to work as effectively in
this application as they are known to do
in many others, and achieve reductions
far in excess of 60 percent. The
commenter urged EPA to remedy this
deficiency in the final rule by
promulgating more stringent control
requirements for this class of very large,
very highly polluting engines.
Response: EPA does not agree with
the commenter that SCR control systems
are not a feasible option for engines
located in Alaska. There are at least
three facilities in Alaska that have
stationary engines equipped with SCR,
see the memorandum entitled
‘‘Emission Standards for Engines with a
Displacement of ≥30 Liters per
Cylinder,’’ available from the
rulemaking docket. EPA does not expect
that there will be any emergency
engines with a displacement greater
than 30 liters per cylinder; however, to
the extent that such units exist, they
will be very substantial emitters during
use and should be required to use the
best technology available. In response to
the commenter’s statement regarding
readiness testing, EPA has increased the
maintenance and testing allowance for
emergency engines from 30 to 100 hours
per year in the final rule, with the
option to submit a petition for
additional hours. EPA agrees in general
with the comments regarding the
proposed emission limitation for PM.
The final rule has been written
considering the comments received and
requires 60 percent PM reduction or an
emission limit of 0.15 g/KW-hr (0.11 g/
HP-hr). EPA believes the PM standard
will be achievable through the use of
lower sulfur fuel, on-engine controls,
and aftertreatment. EPA believes that
the PM percent reduction requirement is
feasible through application of ESP.
Based on information EPA has received,
the technology is capable of reducing
PM by 60 percent. Other information
indicates that the technology could
reduce PM by even more; from 55 to 85
percent when operating on heavy fuel
oil, see information in the docket.
EPA does not agree with the
commenter that EPA did not evaluate
costs and environmental impacts. EPA
has provided detailed analyses of the
expected costs of this regulation and the
expected emission reductions and
benefits and evaluated the technology
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
39168
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
for this rule based on best demonstrated
technology, not lowest achievable
emission rate. EPA evaluated the
environmental and economic impacts of
the best demonstrated control
technologies, which are documented in
a memorandum included in the docket
entitled ‘‘Emission Standards for
Engines with a Displacement of ≥30
Liters per Cylinder.’’ While there are
few CI ICE with a displacement of
greater than or equal to 30 liters per
cylinder, they are individually very
large emitters of pollutants. Moreover,
in regulating criteria pollutants such as
ozone and PM, it is assumed that the
emissions come from numerous
different sources whose individual
contribution may be relatively small.
Further, as noted in the analyses, there
are benefits from these standards in
attainment areas, and these national
regulations are designed to provide
protection from pollution occurring in
all areas of the country, not merely
nonattainment areas. EPA does not
believe that the final emission standards
will have a significant adverse effect on
the price of electricity and the supply of
energy, and the commenters did not
provide any data to support this
assertion. While EPA disagrees with
much of the commenter’s statements,
EPA has evaluated all comments
received on this matter and agrees with
the comments that the proposed NOX
g/KW-hr emission limitation and the
proposed PM emission standards were
too stringent. The final rule requires
engines with a displacement greater
than 30 liters per cylinder to reduce
NOX emissions by at least 90 percent or
meet a NOX emission limitation of 1.6
g/KW-hr (1.2 g/HP-hr), and to reduce
PM emissions by at least 60 percent or
meet a PM emission limitation of 0.15
g/KW-hr (0.11 g/HP-hr). There are
several facilities worldwide that are
successfully using ESP for PM control
and specific examples of such
installations can be found in the
Summary of Public Comments
document. Sources can also use other
approaches, including traps, the use of
lower sulfur fuel, and on-engine
controls. The PM emission limit is
consistent with comments received from
one of the commenters. Regarding the
NOX standard, SCR has been
demonstrated as feasible for stationary
CI ICE and is in use on several engines
in the U.S. SCR technology is capable of
achieving emission reductions of 90
percent or greater in many cases. EPA
reviewed emission rates of stationary CI
engines with a displacement of greater
than or equal to 30 liters per cylinder
and based on an average uncontrolled
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
NOX emission rate from these engines of
about 11.8 g/HP-hr, applying SCR with
a reduction efficiency of 90 percent
yields a controlled NOX emission rate of
1.2 g/HP-hr. EPA therefore believes the
final standards for NOX are appropriate.
Also note, that the commenter seems to
concede that these standards are
feasible, because the commenter accepts
the proposed (more stringent) standards
in nonattainment areas. EPA notes that
this regulation applies only to new
engines, not existing engines. The only
engines manufactured prior to April 1,
2006, covered by this regulation are
engines that are modified or
reconstructed, as is required under the
CAA. For further discussion regarding
EPA’s final standards for engines with a
displacement greater than 30 liters per
cylinder, see the memorandum entitled
‘‘Emission Standards for Engines with a
Displacement of ≥30 Liters per
Cylinder.’’
F. Military Training Engines
Comment: One commenter
recommended that the rule exempt
engines used in training and testing of
military personnel in the operation,
maintenance and repair of engines.
These engines may have to be
configured similarly to engines used by
the U.S. or its allies in combat
operations, which may make it difficult
or impossible for them to comply with
the NSPS.
Response: EPA agrees that it is
appropriate to exempt engines used for
military purposes. A national security
exemption exists already (see, e.g., 40
CFR part 89 subpart J). Engines meeting
the conditions specified in 40 CFR
89.908, and the corresponding
provisions in parts 94 and 1068, will be
considered exempt from the regulations
for stationary CI ICE. An engine that
receives the national security exemption
under the non-road engine provisions
when purchased will continue to be
exempt if used as a stationary ICE, as
long as it continues to be used for
national security purposes. In addition,
engines that receive a national security
exemption will also be exempt from the
fuel requirements in section 60.4207 of
the final regulations. EPA believes that
these provisions address the
commenter’s concerns.
V. Summary of Environmental, Energy
and Economic Impacts
A. What are the air quality impacts?
The final rule will reduce NOX
emissions from stationary CI ICE by an
estimated 38,000 tpy, PM emissions by
about 3,000 tpy, non-methane
hydrocarbon (NMHC) emissions by
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
about 600 tpy, SO2 emissions by an
estimated 9,000 tpy, and CO emissions
by approximately 18,000 tpy in the year
2015. Reductions are presented for the
year 2015 because it is the model year
for which certified stationary CI ICE
would have to meet the final Tier 4
emission standards. EPA estimates that
approximately 81,500 stationary CI ICE
will be affected by the final rule in the
year 2015. Of these, EPA estimates that
20 percent are used in non-emergency
applications. EPA expects very few
stationary CI ICE with a displacement of
30 liters per cylinder or more to be
installed per year, and no emissions or
emissions reductions have been
estimated for these engines. A
secondary impact of the final rule is the
reduction of HAP that will result from
the use of CDPF. EPA estimates that
emissions of HAP will be reduced by
approximately 93 tons in the year 2015.
The final rule will reduce NOX
emissions from stationary CI ICE by an
estimated 270,000 tpy, PM emissions by
about 17,000 tpy, NMHC emissions by
about 8,000 tpy, SO2 emissions by an
estimated 24,000 tpy, and CO emissions
by approximately 95,000 tpy in the year
2030. EPA estimated emissions
reductions for the year 2030 because it
is expected that almost all of the air
quality impacts will be incorporated by
that year, given turnover of old engines.
B. What are the cost impacts?
The total costs of the final rule are
mostly based on the cost associated with
purchasing and installing NOX adsorber
and CDPF controls on non-emergency
stationary CI ICE. A smaller portion of
the total costs are attributed to the cost
of reporting and the cost for
performance testing for a portion of the
pre-2007 model year engines. The cost
of NOX adsorber and CDPF were based
on information developed for the
nonroad rule for diesel engines. EPA
expects that very few stationary CI ICE
with a displacement of 30 cylinders or
more would be installed in the U.S. and,
therefore, no costs have been estimated.
However, if stationary CI ICE of such
displacement are installed, there would
be associated notification and
compliance testing costs. Further
information on how EPA estimated the
total costs of the final rule can be found
in a memorandum included in the
docket (Docket ID. No. EPA–HQ–OAR–
2005–0029).
The total national capital cost for the
final rule is estimated to be
approximately $67 million in the year
2015, with a total national annual cost
of $57 million in the year 2015. The
year 2015 is the model year for which
all stationary CI ICE would have to meet
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
the final Tier 4 emission standards. The
total national capital and annual costs
in the year 2030 are estimated to be $93
and $286 million, respectively.
C. What are the economic impacts?
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
The final rule affects new sources of
stationary diesel engines as part of
generator sets and welding equipment,
pump and compressor equipment, and
irrigation equipment. We performed an
economic impact analysis, whose
methodology is based on that for the
nonroad diesel engine rule promulgated
by EPA in 2004 that estimates changes
in prices and output for affected sources
using the annual compliance costs
estimated for the final rule. All
estimates are for year 2015, since this is
the year for which the compliance cost
impacts are estimated.
The increases in price estimated for
this equipment are the following: 2.3
percent—irrigation systems, 4.3
percent—pumps and compressors, and
10.0 percent—generator sets and
welding equipment. While these price
increases appear substantial, the
corresponding reductions in output are
quite small. They are: 0.01 percent—
irrigation systems, 0.03 percent—pumps
and compressors, and 0.42 percent—
generator sets and welding equipment.
The price increases and reductions in
output were larger for smaller sized
engines when compared to larger sized
ones. These small reductions in output
are due to limited change in demand
from consumers in response to the
estimated price changes as based on
market data utilized in the nonroad rule
economic impact analysis. The overall
total annual social costs, which reflect
changes in consumer and producer
behavior in response to the compliance
costs, are $39.1 million (2002$) or
almost identical to the compliance
costs.
The economic impacts are relatively
small since the change in expected
output from affected industries will be
quite small. Thus, the industries
producing the affected engines and the
consumers who would use these
engines will experience little or no
impact as a result of the final rule.
For more information, refer to the
economic impact analysis report that is
in the public docket.
D. What are the non-air health,
environmental and energy impacts.
EPA does not anticipate any
significant non-air health,
environmental or energy impacts as a
result of the final rule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
E. What are the benefits?
We estimate the benefits of this rule
to be $1.36 billion (2000$) in the year
2015. We base this estimate on the
approach and methodology laid out in
EPA’s 2004 benefits analysis supporting
the regulation of emissions from
nonroad diesel engines (included in the
Final Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA):
Control of Emissions from Nonroad
Diesel Engines, May 2004). We chose
this analysis as the basis since most of
the elements in that rule are similar to
those covered here. The engine type, the
controls applied, and the pollutants
affected are similar to those covered by
the Nonroad Diesel engine rule. In
addition, EPA believes that these types
of engines are broadly distributed across
the country similar in distribution to
nonroad diesel engines. These four
factors lead us to believe is appropriate
to use the benefits transfer approach and
values in the Nonroad Diesel engine
rule analysis for estimating the benefits
of this rule. Specifically, these estimates
are based on application of the benefits
scaling approach derived from the
benefits analyses completed for that
rulemaking. The methodology is laid
out in the Nonroad Diesel RIA.
For this RIA, we did not go through
the detailed uncertainty assessment
used in the Nonroad Diesel RIA because
we lack the necessary air quality input
data to run the benefits model.
However, the results of a Monte Carlo
analysis of the health and welfare
benefits presented in Appendix B of the
Nonroad Diesel RIA can provide some
evidence of the uncertainty surrounding
the benefits results presented in this
analysis. At the 5th percentile, the
monetized benefits are roughly one
quarter of the mean benefits estimate
and at the 95th percentile they are
roughly double the mean. We also used
an approach for estimating benefits in
which we applied an expert elicitation
approach. An expert elicitation
approach uses a probabilistic approach
that provides quantitative measures of
uncertainty from multiple sources as
integrated by experts. For the expert
elicitation based approach, the 95th
percentile of total benefits is
approximately three times the mean,
while the 5th percentile is
approximately one-twentieth of the
mean. The overall range from 5th to
95th is somewhat wider than that of the
statistical based approach.
Using these values as a guide, we
assumed that the distribution of values
for this rule would be similar. Thus, at
the 5th percentile, monetized benefits
would be roughly $340 million (2000$)
and at the 95th percentile, monetized
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39169
benefits would be roughly $2.7 billion
(2000$) assuming a 3 percent discount
rate. This is the same discount rate we
apply in our benefits estimate listed
above. Using estimates derived from the
expert elicitation approach and again
assuming a 3 percent discount rate,
monetized benefits at the 5th percentile
would be roughly $68 million (2000$)
and at the 95th percentile, monetized
benefits would be roughly $4.4 billion
(2000$).
With the annualized costs of this
rulemaking estimated at $57 million
(2000$) in 2015 and with benefits of
$1.36 billion (2000$) for that same year,
EPA believes that the benefits are likely
to exceed the costs. Please refer to the
Nonroad diesel RIA for a detailed
discussion of the uncertainties
considered in EPA’s benefit analyses.
For more information, please refer to
the RIA for this rule that is available in
the docket.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), we must
determine whether a regulatory action is
‘‘significant’’ and, therefore, subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) and the requirements of
the Executive Order. The Executive
Order defines ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ as one that is likely to result in
a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
Pursuant to the terms of Executive
Order 12866, OMB has notified EPA
that it considers this a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ within the meaning
of the Executive Order. EPA has
submitted this action to OMB for
review. Changes made in response to
OMB suggestions or recommendations
will be documented in the public
record.
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
39170
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements in the final rule have been
submitted for approval to OMB under
the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq. The Information Collection
Request (ICR) document prepared by
EPA has been assigned EPA ICR number
2196.01.
The information requirements are
based on notification, recordkeeping,
and reporting requirements in the NSPS
General Provisions (40 CFR part 60,
subpart A), which are mandatory for all
operators subject to national emission
standards. These recordkeeping and
reporting requirements are specifically
authorized by section 114 of the CAA
(42 U.S.C. 7414). All information
submitted to EPA pursuant to the
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements for which a claim of
confidentiality is made is safeguarded
according to Agency policies set forth in
40 CFR part 2, subpart B.
The final rule will require
maintenance inspections of the control
devices but will not require any
notifications or reports beyond those
required by the General Provisions. The
recordkeeping requirements require
only the specific information needed to
determine compliance.
The annual monitoring, reporting, and
recordkeeping burden for this collection
(averaged over the first 3 years after the
effective date of the final rule) is
estimated to be 145,000 labor hours per
year at a total annual cost of $9,593,700.
This estimate includes a one-time
notification, engine certification, and
recordkeeping. There are no capital/
start-up costs associated with the
monitoring requirements over the 3-year
period of the ICR. The operation and
maintenance costs for the monitoring
requirements over the 3-year period of
the ICR are estimated to be $242,300 per
year.
Burden means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons
to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose
or provide information to or for a
Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop,
acquire, install, and utilize technology
and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements; train personnel to be able
to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in 40
CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
generally requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, small not-forprofit enterprises, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
For the purposes of assessing the
impacts of the final rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as a
small business based on the following
Small Business Administration small
business size definitions that are based
on employee size: NAICS 335312—
Motor and Generator Manufacturing—
1,000 employees; NAICS 333911—
Pump and Pumping Equipment
Manufacturing—500 employees; NAICS
333912—Air and Gas Compressor
Manufacturing—500 employees; NAICS
333992—Welding and Soldering
Equipment Manufacturing—500
employees. In addition, a small
governmental jurisdiction is defined as
a government of a city, county, town,
school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000, and a
small organization is defined as any notfor-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and
is not dominant in its field.
After considering the economic
impacts of this final rule on small
entities, I conclude that this final action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The small entities directly
regulated by the final rule are
businesses within the NAICS codes
mentioned above. There are 104
ultimate parent businesses that will be
affected by the final rule. Sixty of these
businesses are small according to the
SBA small business size standards. Four
of these sixty firms will have an
annualized compliance cost of more
than 1 percent of sales associated with
meeting the requirements of the final
rule, and one of these four will have a
compliance cost of more than 3 percent
of sales. For more information on the
small entity impacts, refer to the
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
economic impact and small business
analyses in the rulemaking docket.
Although the final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
EPA nonetheless tried to reduce the
impact of the final rule on small
entities. A majority of the affected
facilities are primarily small entities
(e.g., small businesses). When
developing the rule, EPA took special
steps to ensure that the burdens
imposed on small entities were
reasonable.
EPA is including the same provisions
for small manufacturers and small
refiners that the nonroad CI engine rule
does. EPA is helping small entities by
providing a lead time for the required
emission standards and fuel
requirements. Owners and operators of
non-emergency stationary CI ICE are
subject to minimum reporting and
owners and operators of emergency
stationary CI ICE do not have to submit
any reports. EPA has also specifically
worked with industry to provide special
provisions for emergency fire pump
engine manufacturers, some of which
are small businesses, to develop a rule
that is achievable for this segment.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
EPA generally must prepare a written
statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules
with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may
result in expenditures by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million
or more in any 1 year. Before
promulgating an EPA rule for which a
written statement is needed, section 205
of the UMRA generally requires EPA to
identify and consider a reasonable
number of regulatory alternatives and
adopt the least-costly, most costeffective, or least-burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule. The provisions of section
205 do not apply when they are
inconsistent with applicable law.
Moreover, section 205 allows EPA to
adopt an alternative other than the leastcostly, most cost-effective, or leastburdensome alternative if the
Administrator publishes with the final
rule an explanation why that alternative
was not adopted. Before EPA establishes
any regulatory requirements that may
significantly or uniquely affect small
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
governments, including tribal
governments, it must have developed
under section 203 of the UMRA a small
government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially
affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments
to have meaningful and timely input in
the development of EPA regulatory
proposals with significant Federal
intergovernmental mandates, and
informing, educating, and advising
small governments on compliance with
the regulatory requirements.
EPA has determined that this final
rule does not contain a Federal mandate
that may result in expenditures of $100
million or more for State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
the private sector in any 1 year. Thus,
this final rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
the UMRA. In addition, EPA has
determined that the final rule contains
no regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments because it contains no
requirements that apply to such
governments or impose obligations
upon them. Therefore, the final rule is
not subject to the requirements of
section 203 of the UMRA.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) requires us to develop an
accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ are defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’
The final rule does not have
federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. The final rule
primarily affects private industry, and
does not impose significant economic
costs on State or local governments.
Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not
apply to the final rule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000) requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’
The final rule does not have tribal
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on tribal governments, on
the relationship between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to the final rule.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045, entitled
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
applies to any rule that: (1) Is
determined to be ‘‘economically
significant’’ as defined under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that
we have reason to believe may have a
disproportionate effect on children. If
the regulatory action meets both criteria,
we must evaluate the environmental
health or safety effects of the planned
rule on children, and explain why the
planned regulation is preferable to other
potentially effective and reasonably
feasible alternatives considered by the
Agency.
We interpret Executive Order 13045
as applying only to those regulatory
actions that are based on health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required
under section 5–501 of the Executive
Order has the potential to influence the
regulation. The final rule is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 because it is
based on technology performance and
not on health or safety risks.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
The final rule is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ as defined in Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because it is
not likely to have a significant adverse
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39171
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The basis for this
determination is provided below.
The economic impact analysis (EIA)
estimates changes in prices and
production levels for all energy markets
(i.e., petroleum, natural gas, electricity,
and coal). We also estimate how
changes in the energy markets will
impact other users of energy, with a
focus on those that would employ the
non-emergency stationary CI engines
affected by the final rule. The estimated
increase in demand for ULSD in 2015
(the year for which the impacts of the
final rule are estimated) associated with
the final rule is 63.2 million gallons, or
1.505 million barrels for that year. This
amount is equivalent to 4,123 barrels
per day additional demand of ULSD.
The expected increase in demand for
ULSD will not likely be a difficulty for
refiners to meet in 2015. Hence, no
significant adverse effect on the supply
of this fuel is expected from
implementation of the final rule. All
impact estimates for other types of
energy are below the thresholds that
must be evaluated under this Executive
Order, and no adverse effects are
expected to the distribution and use of
energy. The estimates contained within
the EIA thus show that there is no
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy associated
with the final rule.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–113,
Section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in their regulatory and
procurement activities unless to do so
would be inconsistent with applicable
law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
test methods, sampling procedures,
business practices) developed or
adopted by one or more voluntary
consensus bodies. The NTTAA directs
EPA to provide Congress, through
annual reports to OMB, with
explanations when an agency does not
use available and applicable voluntary
consensus standards.
This final rule involves technical
standards. EPA cites the standard test
procedures in 40 CFR part 1039, subpart
F, which in turn cites the procedures in
40 CFR part 1065, 40 CFR 86.1310 for
full flow dilution, 40 CFR 89.412 to
89.418 for raw-gas sampling using
steady-state tests, 40 CFR 89.112(c) for
partial-flow sampling for gaseous
emissions during steady-state tests,
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
39172
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
California Regulations for New 1996 and
Later Heavy-duty Off-Road Diesel Cycle
Engines, 40 CFR 89.112(c), 40 CFR part
86, subpart N (7/1/99), and 40 CFR
86.1309 for non-petroleum diesel fuel.
The procedures in 40 CFR part 1065
also allow any CA ARB or International
Organization for Standardization (ISO)
standard if shown to be equivalent.
Consistent with the NTTAA, EPA
conducted searches to identify
voluntary consensus standards in
addition to these methods. One
voluntary consensus standard was
found that is potentially applicable to
the methods cited. This standard is not
acceptable as an alternative for the
indicated test procedures, as discussed
below.
The voluntary consensus standard
ISO IS0 8178–l:1996, ‘‘Reciprocating
Internal Combustion Engines—Exhaust
Emission Measurement—Part 1: Testbed Measurement of Gaseous and
Particulate Exhaust Emissions,’’ is not
acceptable as an alternative to the test
procedures in §§ 60.4212 and 60.4213 of
the final rule (specifically 40 CFR
86.1310) for the following reasons.
Although ISO 8178–1:1996 has many of
the features of EPA test procedures, the
ISO standard allows the gaseous
measurements to be made in an
undiluted sample whereas EPA
procedures in 40 CFR 86.1310 require at
least one dilution of the sample. The
ISO method does allow the gaseous
measurements to be made during the
double diluted sampling procedures for
PM, but it is not required by the ISO
method. Also, in the measurement of
hydrocarbons, the ISO method only
specifies that the sample lines are to be
maintained above 70°C and advises that
the flow capacity of the sample lines is
used to prevent condensation. In EPA
procedures in 40 CFR 86.1310, the
sample lines must be maintained at
191°C during the hydrocarbon tests to
prevent condensation.
Sections 60.4212 and 60.4213 of the
final rule list the testing method
included in the regulation. Under
§ 63.7(f) and § 63.8(f) of subpart A of the
General Provisions, a source may apply
to EPA for permission to use alternative
test methods or alternative monitoring
requirements in place of any required
testing methods, performance
specifications, or procedures.
J. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this final rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The
final rule will be effective on September
11, 2006.
40 CFR Part 60
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
40 CFR Part 85
Imports, Labeling, Motor vehicle
pollution, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Research, Warranties.
40 CFR Part 89
Administrative practice and
procedure, Imports, Labeling, Motor
vehicle pollution, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Research,
Vessels, Warranties.
40 CFR Part 94
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control,
Imports, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Vessels,
Warranties.
40 CFR Part 1039
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control.
40 CFR Part 1065
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Research.
40 CFR Part 1068
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control,
Imports, Motor vehicle pollution,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Warranties.
Dated: June 28, 2006.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
title 40, chapter I, of the Code of Federal
Regulations is amended to read as
follows:
Fmt 4701
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart A—[AMENDED]
2. Section 60.17(a) is amended by
redesignating paragraphs (a)(84) through
(a)(91) as paragraphs (a)(85) through
(a)(92), respectively and adding a new
paragraph (a)(84) to read as follows:
I
§ 60.17
Incorporations by Reference.
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(84) ASTM D6348–03, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Gaseous
Compounds by Extractive Direct
Interface Fourier Transform Infrared
(FTIR) Spectroscopy, IBR approved for
table 7 of Subpart IIII of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Part 60 is amended by adding
subpart IIII to read as follows:
I
Subpart IIII—Standards of Performance
for Stationary Compression Ignition
Internal Combustion Engines
What This Subpart Covers
Sec.
60.4200
Am I subject to this subpart?
Emission Standards for Manufacturers
60.4201 What emission standards must I
meet for non-emergency engines if I am
a stationary CI internal combustion
engine manufacturer?
60.4202 What emission standards must I
meet for emergency engines if I am a
stationary CI internal combustion engine
manufacturer?
60.4203 How long must my engines meet
the emission standards if I am a
stationary CI internal combustion engine
manufacturer?
Emission Standards for Owners and
Operators
60.4204 What emission standards must I
meet for non-emergency engines if I am
an owner or operator of a stationary CI
internal combustion engine?
60.4205 What emission standards must I
meet for emergency engines if I am an
owner or operator of a stationary CI
internal combustion engine?
60.4206 How long must I meet the emission
standards if I am an owner or operator
of a stationary CI internal combustion
engine?
Fuel Requirements for Owners and
Operators
I
Frm 00020
1. The authority citation for part 60
continues to read as follows:
I
*
List of Subjects
PO 00000
PART 60—[AMENDED]
Sfmt 4700
60.4207 What fuel requirements must I
meet if I am an owner or operator of a
stationary CI internal combustion engine
subject to this subpart?
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Other Requirements for Owners and
Operators
60.4208 What is the deadline for importing
and installing stationary CI ICE produced
in the previous model year?
60.4209 What are the monitoring
requirements if I am an owner or
operator of a stationary CI internal
combustion engine?
Compliance Requirements
60.4210 What are my compliance
requirements if I am a stationary CI
internal combustion engine
manufacturer?
60.4211 What are my compliance
requirements if I am an owner or
operator of a stationary CI internal
combustion engine?
Testing Requirements for Owners and
Operators
60.4212 What test methods and other
procedures must I use if I am an owner
or operator of a stationary CI internal
combustion engine with a displacement
of less than 30 liters per cylinder?
60.4213 What test methods and other
procedures must I use if I am an owner
or operator of a stationary CI internal
combustion engine with a displacement
of greater than or equal to 30 liters per
cylinder?
Notification, Reports, and Records for
Owners and Operators
60.4214 What are my notification,
reporting, and recordkeeping
requirements if I am an owner or
operator of a stationary CI internal
combustion engine?
Special Requirements
60.4215 What requirements must I meet for
engines used in Guam, American Samoa,
or the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands?
60.4216 What requirements must I meet for
engines used in Alaska?
60.4217 What emission standards must I
meet if I am an owner or operator of a
stationary internal combustion engine
using special fuels?
General Provisions
60.4218 What parts of the General
Provisions apply to me?
Definitions
60.4219 What definitions apply to this
subpart?
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
Tables to Subpart IIII of Part 60
Table 1 to Subpart IIII of Part 60—Emission
Standards for Stationary Pre-2007 Model
Year Engines with a displacement of <10
liters per cylinder and 2007–2010 Model
Year Engines >2,237 KW (3,000 HP) and
with a displacement of <10 liters per
cylinder
Table 2 to Subpart IIII of Part 60—Emission
Standards for 2008 Model Year and Later
Emergency Stationary CI ICE <37 KW (50
HP) and with a Displacement of <10 liters
per cylinder
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Table 3 to Subpart IIII of Part 60—
Certification Requirements for Stationary
Fire Pump Engines
Table 4 to Subpart IIII of Part 60—Emission
Standards for Stationary Fire Pump
Engines
Table 5 to Subpart IIII of Part 60—Labeling
and Recordkeeping Requirements for New
Stationary Emergency Engines
Table 6 to Subpart IIII of Part 60—Optional
3-Mode Test Cycle for Stationary Fire
Pump Engines
Table 7 to Subpart IIII of Part 60—
Requirements for Performance Tests for
Stationary CI ICE with a displacement of
≥30 liters per cylinder
Table 8 to Subpart IIII of Part 60—
Applicability of General Provisions to
Subpart IIII
Subpart IIII—Standards of Performance
for Stationary Compression Ignition
Internal Combustion Engines
What This Subpart Covers
§ 60.4200
Am I subject to this subpart?
(a) The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to manufacturers, owners,
and operators of stationary compression
ignition (CI) internal combustion
engines (ICE) as specified in paragraphs
(a)(1) through (3) of this section. For the
purposes of this subpart, the date that
construction commences is the date the
engine is ordered by the owner or
operator.
(1) Manufacturers of stationary CI ICE
with a displacement of less than 30
liters per cylinder where the model year
is:
(i) 2007 or later, for engines that are
not fire pump engines,
(ii) The model year listed in table 3
to this subpart or later model year, for
fire pump engines.
(2) Owners and operators of stationary
CI ICE that commence construction after
July 11, 2005 where the stationary CI
ICE are:
(i) Manufactured after April 1, 2006
and are not fire pump engines, or
(ii) Manufactured as a certified
National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) fire pump engine after July 1,
2006.
(3) Owners and operators of stationary
CI ICE that modify or reconstruct their
stationary CI ICE after July 11, 2005.
(b) The provisions of this subpart are
not applicable to stationary CI ICE being
tested at a stationary CI ICE test cell/
stand.
(c) If you are an owner or operator of
an area source subject to this subpart,
you are exempt from the obligation to
obtain a permit under 40 CFR part 70 or
40 CFR part 71, provided you are not
required to obtain a permit under 40
CFR 70.3(a) or 40 CFR 71.3(a) for a
reason other than your status as an area
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39173
source under this subpart.
Notwithstanding the previous sentence,
you must continue to comply with the
provisions of this subpart applicable to
area sources.
(d) Stationary CI ICE may be eligible
for exemption from the requirements of
this subpart as described in 40 CFR part
1068, subpart C (or the exemptions
described in 40 CFR part 89, subpart J
and 40 CFR part 94, subpart J, for
engines that would need to be certified
to standards in those parts), except that
owners and operators, as well as
manufacturers, may be eligible to
request an exemption for national
security.
Emission Standards for Manufacturers
§ 60.4201 What emission standards must I
meet for non-emergency engines if I am a
stationary CI internal combustion engine
manufacturer?
(a) Stationary CI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must certify their
2007 model year and later nonemergency stationary CI ICE with a
maximum engine power less than or
equal to 2,237 kilowatt (KW) (3,000
horsepower (HP)) and a displacement of
less than 10 liters per cylinder to the
certification emission standards for new
nonroad CI engines in 40 CFR 89.112,
40 CFR 89.113, 40 CFR 1039.101, 40
CFR 1039.102, 40 CFR 1039.104, 40 CFR
1039.105, 40 CFR 1039.107, and 40 CFR
1039.115, as applicable, for all
pollutants, for the same model year and
maximum engine power.
(b) Stationary CI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must certify their
2007 through 2010 model year nonemergency stationary CI ICE with a
maximum engine power greater than
2,237 KW (3,000 HP) and a
displacement of less than 10 liters per
cylinder to the emission standards in
table 1 to this subpart, for all pollutants,
for the same maximum engine power.
(c) Stationary CI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must certify their
2011 model year and later nonemergency stationary CI ICE with a
maximum engine power greater than
2,237 KW (3,000 HP) and a
displacement of less than 10 liters per
cylinder to the certification emission
standards for new nonroad CI engines in
40 CFR 1039.101, 40 CFR 1039.102, 40
CFR 1039.104, 40 CFR 1039.105, 40 CFR
1039.107, and 40 CFR 1039.115, as
applicable, for all pollutants, for the
same maximum engine power.
(d) Stationary CI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must certify their
2007 model year and later nonemergency stationary CI ICE with a
displacement of greater than or equal to
10 liters per cylinder and less than 30
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
39174
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
liters per cylinder to the certification
emission standards for new marine CI
engines in 40 CFR 94.8, as applicable,
for all pollutants, for the same
displacement and maximum engine
power.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
§ 60.4202 What emission standards must I
meet for emergency engines if I am a
stationary CI internal combustion engine
manufacturer?
(a) Stationary CI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must certify their
2007 model year and later emergency
stationary CI ICE with a maximum
engine power less than or equal to 2,237
KW (3,000 HP) and a displacement of
less than 10 liters per cylinder that are
not fire pump engines to the emission
standards specified in paragraphs (a)(1)
through (2) of this section.
(1) For engines with a maximum
engine power less than 37 KW (50 HP):
(i) The certification emission
standards for new nonroad CI engines
for the same model year and maximum
engine power in 40 CFR 89.112 and 40
CFR 89.113 for all pollutants for model
year 2007 engines, and
(ii) The certification emission
standards for new nonroad CI engines in
40 CFR 1039.104, 40 CFR 1039.105, 40
CFR 1039.107, 40 CFR 1039.115, and
table 2 to this subpart, for 2008 model
year and later engines.
(2) For engines with a maximum
engine power greater than or equal to 37
KW (50 HP), the certification emission
standards for new nonroad CI engines
for the same model year and maximum
engine power in 40 CFR 89.112 and 40
CFR 89.113 for all pollutants beginning
in model year 2007.
(b) Stationary CI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must certify their
2007 model year and later emergency
stationary CI ICE with a maximum
engine power greater than 2,237 KW
(3,000 HP) and a displacement of less
than 10 liters per cylinder that are not
fire pump engines to the emission
standards specified in paragraphs (b)(1)
through (2) of this section.
(1) For 2007 through 2010 model
years, the emission standards in table 1
to this subpart, for all pollutants, for the
same maximum engine power.
(2) For 2011 model year and later, the
certification emission standards for new
nonroad CI engines for engines of the
same model year and maximum engine
power in 40 CFR 89.112 and 40 CFR
89.113 for all pollutants.
(c) Stationary CI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must certify their
2007 model year and later emergency
stationary CI ICE with a displacement of
greater than or equal to 10 liters per
cylinder and less than 30 liters per
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
cylinder that are not fire pump engines
to the certification emission standards
for new marine CI engines in 40 CFR
94.8, as applicable, for all pollutants, for
the same displacement and maximum
engine power.
(d) Beginning with the model years in
table 3 to this subpart, stationary CI
internal combustion engine
manufacturers must certify their fire
pump stationary CI ICE to the emission
standards in table 4 to this subpart, for
all pollutants, for the same model year
and NFPA nameplate power.
§ 60.4203 How long must my engines meet
the emission standards if I am a stationary
CI internal combustion engine
manufacturer?
Engines manufactured by stationary
CI internal combustion engine
manufacturers must meet the emission
standards as required in §§ 60.4201 and
60.4202 during the useful life of the
engines.
Emission Standards for Owners and
Operators
§ 60.4204 What emission standards must I
meet for non-emergency engines if I am an
owner or operator of a stationary CI internal
combustion engine?
(a) Owners and operators of pre-2007
model year non-emergency stationary CI
ICE with a displacement of less than 10
liters per cylinder must comply with the
emission standards in table 1 to this
subpart. Owners and operators of pre2007 model year non-emergency
stationary CI ICE with a displacement of
greater than or equal to 10 liters per
cylinder and less than 30 liters per
cylinder must comply with the emission
standards in 40 CFR 94.8(a)(1).
(b) Owners and operators of 2007
model year and later non-emergency
stationary CI ICE with a displacement of
less than 30 liters per cylinder must
comply with the emission standards for
new CI engines in § 60.4201 for their
2007 model year and later stationary CI
ICE, as applicable.
(c) Owners and operators of nonemergency stationary CI ICE with a
displacement of greater than or equal to
30 liters per cylinder must meet the
requirements in paragraphs (c)(1) and
(2) of this section.
(1) Reduce nitrogen oxides (NOX)
emissions by 90 percent or more, or
limit the emissions of NOX in the
stationary CI internal combustion
engine exhaust to 1.6 grams per KWhour (g/KW-hr) (1.2 grams per HP-hour
(g/HP-hr)).
(2) Reduce particulate matter (PM)
emissions by 60 percent or more, or
limit the emissions of PM in the
stationary CI internal combustion
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
engine exhaust to 0.15 g/KW-hr (0.11 g/
HP-hr).
§ 60.4205 What emission standards must I
meet for emergency engines if I am an
owner or operator of a stationary CI internal
combustion engine?
(a) Owners and operators of pre-2007
model year emergency stationary CI ICE
with a displacement of less than 10
liters per cylinder that are not fire pump
engines must comply with the emission
standards in table 1 to this subpart.
Owners and operators of pre-2007
model year non-emergency stationary CI
ICE with a displacement of greater than
or equal to 10 liters per cylinder and
less than 30 liters per cylinder that are
not fire pump engines must comply
with the emission standards in 40 CFR
94.8(a)(1).
(b) Owners and operators of 2007
model year and later emergency
stationary CI ICE with a displacement of
less than 30 liters per cylinder that are
not fire pump engines must comply
with the emission standards for new
nonroad CI engines in § 60.4202, for all
pollutants, for the same model year and
maximum engine power for their 2007
model year and later emergency
stationary CI ICE.
(c) Owners and operators of fire pump
engines with a displacement of less than
30 liters per cylinder must comply with
the emission standards in table 4 to this
subpart, for all pollutants.
(d) Owners and operators of
emergency stationary CI ICE with a
displacement of greater than or equal to
30 liters per cylinder must meet the
requirements in paragraphs (d)(1) and
(2) of this section.
(1) Reduce NOX emissions by 90
percent or more, or limit the emissions
of NOX in the stationary CI internal
combustion engine exhaust to 1.6 grams
per KW-hour (1.2 grams per HP-hour).
(2) Reduce PM emissions by 60
percent or more, or limit the emissions
of PM in the stationary CI internal
combustion engine exhaust to 0.15 g/
KW-hr (0.11 g/HP-hr).
§ 60.4206 How long must I meet the
emission standards if I am an owner or
operator of a stationary CI internal
combustion engine?
Owners and operators of stationary CI
ICE must operate and maintain
stationary CI ICE that achieve the
emission standards as required in
§§ 60.4204 and 60.4205 according to the
manufacturer’s written instructions or
procedures developed by the owner or
operator that are approved by the engine
manufacturer, over the entire life of the
engine.
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Fuel Requirements for Owners and
Operators
§ 60.4207 What fuel requirements must I
meet if I am an owner or operator of a
stationary CI internal combustion engine
subject to this subpart?
(a) Beginning October 1, 2007, owners
and operators of stationary CI ICE
subject to this subpart that use diesel
fuel must use diesel fuel that meets the
requirements of 40 CFR 80.510(a).
(b) Beginning October 1, 2010, owners
and operators of stationary CI ICE
subject to this subpart with a
displacement of less than 30 liters per
cylinder that use diesel fuel must use
diesel fuel that meets the requirements
of 40 CFR 80.510(b) for nonroad diesel
fuel.
(c) Owners and operators of pre-2011
model year stationary CI ICE subject to
this subpart may petition the
Administrator for approval to use
remaining non-compliant fuel that does
not meet the fuel requirements of
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section
beyond the dates required for the
purpose of using up existing fuel
inventories. If approved, the petition
will be valid for a period of up to 6
months. If additional time is needed, the
owner or operator is required to submit
a new petition to the Administrator.
(d) Owners and operators of pre-2011
model year stationary CI ICE subject to
this subpart that are located in areas of
Alaska not accessible by the Federal Aid
Highway System may petition the
Administrator for approval to use any
fuels mixed with used lubricating oil
that do not meet the fuel requirements
of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
Owners and operators must demonstrate
in their petition to the Administrator
that there is no other place to use the
lubricating oil. If approved, the petition
will be valid for a period of up to 6
months. If additional time is needed, the
owner or operator is required to submit
a new petition to the Administrator.
(e) Stationary CI ICE that have a
national security exemption under
§ 60.4200(d) are also exempt from the
fuel requirements in this section.
Other Requirements for Owners and
Operators
CI ICE with a maximum engine power
of less than 19 KW (25 HP) (excluding
fire pump engines) that do not meet the
applicable requirements for 2008 model
year engines.
(c) After December 31, 2014, owners
and operators may not install nonemergency stationary CI ICE with a
maximum engine power of greater than
or equal to 19 KW (25 HP) and less than
56 KW (75 HP) that do not meet the
applicable requirements for 2013 model
year non-emergency engines.
(d) After December 31, 2013, owners
and operators may not install nonemergency stationary CI ICE with a
maximum engine power of greater than
or equal to 56 KW (75 HP) and less than
130 KW (175 HP) that do not meet the
applicable requirements for 2012 model
year non-emergency engines.
(e) After December 31, 2012, owners
and operators may not install nonemergency stationary CI ICE with a
maximum engine power of greater than
or equal to 130 KW (175 HP), including
those above 560 KW (750 HP), that do
not meet the applicable requirements for
2011 model year non-emergency
engines.
(f) After December 31, 2016, owners
and operators may not install nonemergency stationary CI ICE with a
maximum engine power of greater than
or equal to 560 KW (750 HP) that do not
meet the applicable requirements for
2015 model year non-emergency
engines.
(g) In addition to the requirements
specified in §§ 60.4201, 60.4202,
60.4204, and 60.4205, it is prohibited to
import stationary CI ICE with a
displacement of less than 30 liters per
cylinder that do not meet the applicable
requirements specified in paragraphs (a)
through (f) of this section after the dates
specified in paragraphs (a) through (f) of
this section.
(h) The requirements of this section
do not apply to owners or operators of
stationary CI ICE that have been
modified, reconstructed, and do not
apply to engines that were removed
from one existing location and
reinstalled at a new location.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
§ 60.4208 What is the deadline for
importing or installing stationary CI ICE
produced in the previous model year?
§ 60.4209 What are the monitoring
requirements if I am an owner or operator
of a stationary CI internal combustion
engine?
(a) After December 31, 2008, owners
and operators may not install stationary
CI ICE (excluding fire pump engines)
that do not meet the applicable
requirements for 2007 model year
engines.
(b) After December 31, 2009, owners
and operators may not install stationary
If you are an owner or operator, you
must meet the monitoring requirements
of this section. In addition, you must
also meet the monitoring requirements
specified in § 60.4211.
(a) If you are an owner or operator of
an emergency stationary CI internal
combustion engine, you must install a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39175
non-resettable hour meter prior to
startup of the engine.
(b) If you are an owner or operator of
a stationary CI internal combustion
engine equipped with a diesel
particulate filter to comply with the
emission standards in § 60.4204, the
diesel particulate filter must be installed
with a backpressure monitor that
notifies the owner or operator when the
high backpressure limit of the engine is
approached.
Compliance Requirements
§ 60.4210 What are my compliance
requirements if I am a stationary CI internal
combustion engine manufacturer?
(a) Stationary CI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must certify their
stationary CI ICE with a displacement of
less than 10 liters per cylinder to the
emission standards specified in
§ 60.4201(a) through (c) and
§ 60.4202(a), (b) and (d) using the
certification procedures required in 40
CFR part 89, subpart B, or 40 CFR part
1039, subpart C, as applicable, and must
test their engines as specified in those
parts. For the purposes of this subpart,
engines certified to the standards in
table 1 to this subpart shall be subject
to the same requirements as engines
certified to the standards in 40 CFR part
89. For the purposes of this subpart,
engines certified to the standards in
table 4 to this subpart shall be subject
to the same requirements as engines
certified to the standards in 40 CFR part
89, except that engines with NFPA
nameplate power of less than 37 KW (50
HP) certified to model year 2011 or later
standards shall be subject to the same
requirements as engines certified to the
standards in 40 CFR part 1039.
(b) Stationary CI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must certify their
stationary CI ICE with a displacement of
greater than or equal to 10 liters per
cylinder and less than 30 liters per
cylinder to the emission standards
specified in § 60.4201(d) and
§ 60.4202(c) using the certification
procedures required in 40 CFR part 94
subpart C, and must test their engines as
specified in 40 CFR part 94.
(c) Stationary CI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must meet the
requirements of 40 CFR 1039.120, 40
CFR 1039.125, 40 CFR 1039.130, 40 CFR
1039.135, and 40 CFR part 1068 for
engines that are certified to the emission
standards in 40 CFR part 1039.
Stationary CI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must meet the
corresponding provisions of 40 CFR part
89 or 40 CFR part 94 for engines that
would be covered by that part if they
were nonroad (including marine)
engines. Labels on such engines must
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
39176
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
refer to stationary engines, rather than
or in addition to nonroad or marine
engines, as appropriate. Stationary CI
internal combustion engine
manufacturers must label their engines
according to paragraphs (c)(1) through
(3) of this section.
(1) Stationary CI internal combustion
engines manufactured from January 1,
2006 to March 31, 2006 (January 1, 2006
to June 30, 2006 for fire pump engines),
other than those that are part of certified
engine families under the nonroad CI
engine regulations, must be labeled
according to 40 CFR 1039.20.
(2) Stationary CI internal combustion
engines manufactured from April 1,
2006 to December 31, 2006 (or, for fire
pump engines, July 1, 2006 to December
31 of the year preceding the year listed
in table 3 to this subpart) must be
labeled according to paragraphs (c)(2)(i)
through (iii) of this section:
(i) Stationary CI internal combustion
engines that are part of certified engine
families under the nonroad regulations
must meet the labeling requirements for
nonroad CI engines, but do not have to
meet the labeling requirements in 40
CFR 1039.20.
(ii) Stationary CI internal combustion
engines that meet Tier 1 requirements
(or requirements for fire pumps) under
this subpart, but do not meet the
requirements applicable to nonroad CI
engines must be labeled according to 40
CFR 1039.20. The engine manufacturer
may add language to the label clarifying
that the engine meets Tier 1
requirements (or requirements for fire
pumps) of this subpart.
(iii) Stationary CI internal combustion
engines manufactured after April 1,
2006 that do not meet Tier 1
requirements of this subpart, or fire
pumps engines manufactured after July
1, 2006 that do not meet the
requirements for fire pumps under this
subpart, may not be used in the U.S. If
any such engines are manufactured in
the U.S. after April 1, 2006 (July 1, 2006
for fire pump engines), they must be
exported or must be brought into
compliance with the appropriate
standards prior to initial operation. The
export provisions of 40 CFR 1068.230
would apply to engines for export and
the manufacturers must label such
engines according to 40 CFR 1068.230.
(3) Stationary CI internal combustion
engines manufactured after January 1,
2007 (for fire pump engines, after
January 1 of the year listed in table 3 to
this subpart, as applicable) must be
labeled according to paragraphs (c)(3)(i)
through (iii) of this section.
(i) Stationary CI internal combustion
engines that meet the requirements of
this subpart and the corresponding
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
requirements for nonroad (including
marine) engines of the same model year
and HP must be labeled according to the
provisions in part 89, 94 or 1039, as
appropriate.
(ii) Stationary CI internal combustion
engines that meet the requirements of
this subpart, but are not certified to the
standards applicable to nonroad
(including marine) engines of the same
model year and HP must be labeled
according to the provisions in part 89,
94 or 1039, as appropriate, but the
words ‘‘stationary’’ must be included
instead of ‘‘nonroad’’ or ‘‘marine’’ on
the label. In addition, such engines must
be labeled according to 40 CFR 1039.20.
(iii) Stationary CI internal combustion
engines that do not meet the
requirements of this subpart must be
labeled according to 40 CFR 1068.230
and must be exported under the
provisions of 40 CFR 1068.230.
(d) An engine manufacturer certifying
an engine family or families to
standards under this subpart that are
identical to standards applicable under
parts 89, 94, or 1039 for that model year
may certify any such family that
contains both nonroad (including
marine) and stationary engines as a
single engine family and/or may include
any such family containing stationary
engines in the averaging, banking and
trading provisions applicable for such
engines under those parts.
(e) Manufacturers of engine families
discussed in paragraph (d) of this
section may meet the labeling
requirements referred to in paragraph (c)
of this section for stationary CI ICE by
either adding a separate label containing
the information required in paragraph
(c) of this section or by adding the
words ‘‘and stationary’’ after the word
‘‘nonroad’’ or ‘‘marine,’’ as appropriate,
to the label.
(f) Starting with the model years
shown in table 5 to this subpart,
stationary CI internal combustion
engine manufacturers must add a
permanent label stating that the engine
is for stationary emergency use only to
each new emergency stationary CI
internal combustion engine greater than
or equal to 19 KW (25 HP) that meets
all the emission standards for
emergency engines in § 60.4202 but
does not meet all the emission standards
for non-emergency engines in § 60.4201.
The label must be added according to
the labeling requirements specified in
40 CFR 1039.135(b). Engine
manufacturers must specify in the
owner’s manual that operation of
emergency engines is limited to
emergency operations and required
maintenance and testing.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(g) Manufacturers of fire pump
engines may use the test cycle in table
6 to this subpart for testing fire pump
engines and may test at the NFPA
certified nameplate HP, provided that
the engine is labeled as ‘‘Fire Pump
Applications Only’’.
(h) Engine manufacturers, including
importers, may introduce into
commerce uncertified engines or
engines certified to earlier standards
that were manufactured before the new
or changed standards took effect until
inventories are depleted, as long as such
engines are part of normal inventory.
For example, if the engine
manufacturers’ normal industry practice
is to keep on hand a one-month supply
of engines based on its projected sales,
and a new tier of standards starts to
apply for the 2009 model year, the
engine manufacturer may manufacture
engines based on the normal inventory
requirements late in the 2008 model
year, and sell those engines for
installation. The engine manufacturer
may not circumvent the provisions of
§§ 60.4201 or 60.4202 by stockpiling
engines that are built before new or
changed standards take effect.
Stockpiling of such engines beyond
normal industry practice is a violation
of this subpart.
(i) The replacement engine provisions
of 40 CFR 89.1003(b)(7), 40 CFR
94.1103(b)(3), 40 CFR 94.1103(b)(4) and
40 CFR 1068.240 are applicable to
stationary CI engines replacing existing
equipment that is less than 15 years old.
§ 60.4211 What are my compliance
requirements if I am an owner or operator
of a stationary CI internal combustion
engine?
(a) If you are an owner or operator and
must comply with the emission
standards specified in this subpart, you
must operate and maintain the
stationary CI internal combustion
engine and control device according to
the manufacturer’s written instructions
or procedures developed by the owner
or operator that are approved by the
engine manufacturer. In addition,
owners and operators may only change
those settings that are permitted by the
manufacturer. You must also meet the
requirements of 40 CFR parts 89, 94
and/or 1068, as they apply to you.
(b) If you are an owner or operator of
a pre-2007 model year stationary CI
internal combustion engine and must
comply with the emission standards
specified in §§ 60.4204(a) or 60.4205(a),
or if you are an owner or operator of a
CI fire pump engine that is
manufactured prior to the model years
in table 3 to this subpart and must
comply with the emission standards
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(1) Conducting an initial performance
test to demonstrate initial compliance
with the emission standards as specified
in § 60.4213.
(2) Establishing operating parameters
to be monitored continuously to ensure
the stationary internal combustion
engine continues to meet the emission
standards. The owner or operator must
petition the Administrator for approval
of operating parameters to be monitored
continuously. The petition must include
the information described in paragraphs
(d)(2)(i) through (v) of this section.
(i) Identification of the specific
parameters you propose to monitor
continuously;
(ii) A discussion of the relationship
between these parameters and NOX and
PM emissions, identifying how the
emissions of these pollutants change
with changes in these parameters, and
how limitations on these parameters
will serve to limit NOX and PM
emissions;
(iii) A discussion of how you will
establish the upper and/or lower values
for these parameters which will
establish the limits on these parameters
in the operating limitations;
(iv) A discussion identifying the
methods and the instruments you will
use to monitor these parameters, as well
as the relative accuracy and precision of
these methods and instruments; and
(v) A discussion identifying the
frequency and methods for recalibrating
the instruments you will use for
monitoring these parameters.
(3) For non-emergency engines with a
displacement of greater than or equal to
30 liters per cylinder, conducting
annual performance tests to demonstrate
continuous compliance with the
emission standards as specified in
§ 60.4213.
(e) Emergency stationary ICE may be
operated for the purpose of maintenance
checks and readiness testing, provided
that the tests are recommended by
Federal, State, or local government, the
manufacturer, the vendor, or the
insurance company associated with the
engine. Maintenance checks and
readiness testing of such units is limited
to 100 hours per year. There is no time
limit on the use of emergency stationary
ICE in emergency situations. Anyone
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
NTE requirement for each pollutant = (1.25) × (STD)
Where:
STD = The standard specified for that
pollutant in 40 CFR 89.112 or 40
CFR 94.8, as applicable.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Alternatively, stationary CI ICE that
are complying with the emission
standards for new CI engines in 40 CFR
89.112 or 40 CFR 94.8 may follow the
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
may petition the Administrator for
approval of additional hours to be used
for maintenance checks and readiness
testing, but a petition is not required if
the owner or operator maintains records
indicating that Federal, State, or local
standards require maintenance and
testing of emergency ICE beyond 100
hours per year. For owners and
operators of emergency engines meeting
standards under § 60.4205 but not
§ 60.4204, any operation other than
emergency operation, and maintenance
and testing as permitted in this section,
is prohibited.
Testing Requirements for Owners and
Operators
§ 60.4212 What test methods and other
procedures must I use if I am an owner or
operator of a stationary CI internal
combustion engine with a displacement of
less than 30 liters per cylinder?
Owners and operators of stationary CI
ICE with a displacement of less than 30
liters per cylinder who conduct
performance tests pursuant to this
subpart must do so according to
paragraphs (a) through (d) of this
section.
(a) The performance test must be
conducted according to the in-use
testing procedures in 40 CFR part 1039,
subpart F.
(b) Exhaust emissions from stationary
CI ICE that are complying with the
emission standards for new CI engines
in 40 CFR part 1039 must not exceed the
not-to-exceed (NTE) standards for the
same model year and maximum engine
power as required in 40 CFR
1039.101(e) and 40 CFR 1039.102(g)(1),
except as specified in 40 CFR
1039.104(d). This requirement starts
when NTE requirements take effect for
nonroad diesel engines under 40 CFR
part 1039.
(c) Exhaust emissions from stationary
CI ICE that are complying with the
emission standards for new CI engines
in 40 CFR 89.112 or 40 CFR 94.8, as
applicable, must not exceed the NTE
numerical requirements, rounded to the
same number of decimal places as the
applicable standard in 40 CFR 89.112 or
40 CFR 94.8, as applicable, determined
from the following equation:
(Eq. 1)
testing procedures specified in
§ 60.4213 of this subpart, as appropriate.
(d) Exhaust emissions from stationary
CI ICE that are complying with the
emission standards for pre-2007 model
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
ER11JY06.000
specified in § 60.4205(c), you must
demonstrate compliance according to
one of the methods specified in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this
section.
(1) Purchasing an engine certified
according to 40 CFR part 89 or 40 CFR
part 94, as applicable, for the same
model year and maximum engine
power. The engine must be installed
and configured according to the
manufacturer’s specifications.
(2) Keeping records of performance
test results for each pollutant for a test
conducted on a similar engine. The test
must have been conducted using the
same methods specified in this subpart
and these methods must have been
followed correctly.
(3) Keeping records of engine
manufacturer data indicating
compliance with the standards.
(4) Keeping records of control device
vendor data indicating compliance with
the standards.
(5) Conducting an initial performance
test to demonstrate compliance with the
emission standards according to the
requirements specified in § 60.4212, as
applicable.
(c) If you are an owner or operator of
a 2007 model year and later stationary
CI internal combustion engine and must
comply with the emission standards
specified in § 60.4204(b) or § 60.4205(b),
or if you are an owner or operator of a
CI fire pump engine that is
manufactured during or after the model
year that applies to your fire pump
engine power rating in table 3 to this
subpart and must comply with the
emission standards specified in
§ 60.4205(c), you must comply by
purchasing an engine certified to the
emission standards in § 60.4204(b), or
§ 60.4205(b) or (c), as applicable, for the
same model year and maximum (or in
the case of fire pumps, NFPA
nameplate) engine power. The engine
must be installed and configured
according to the manufacturer’s
specifications.
(d) If you are an owner or operator
and must comply with the emission
standards specified in § 60.4204(c) or
§ 60.4205(d), you must demonstrate
compliance according to the
requirements specified in paragraphs
(d)(1) through (3) of this section.
39177
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
17:39 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
(Eq. 3)
Where:
Cadj = Calculated NOX or PM concentration
adjusted to 15 percent O2.
Cd = Measured concentration of NOX or PM,
uncorrected.
5.9 = 20.9 percent O2¥15 percent O2, the
defined O2 correction value, percent.
%O2 = Measured O2 concentration, dry basis,
percent.
(3) If pollutant concentrations are to
be corrected to 15 percent O2 and CO2
concentration is measured in lieu of O2
concentration measurement, a CO2
correction factor is needed. Calculate
the CO2 correction factor as described in
paragraphs (d)(3)(i) through (iii) of this
section.
(i) Calculate the fuel-specific Fo value
for the fuel burned during the test using
ER =
VerDate Aug<31>2005
5.9
20.9 − % O 2
Cd × 1.912 × 10−3 × Q × T
KW-hour
Cadj × Q × T
KW-hour
(Eq. 8)
Where:
Fo = Fuel factor based on the ratio of O2
volume to the ultimate CO2 volume
produced by the fuel at zero percent
excess air.
0.209 = Fraction of air that is O2, percent/
100.
Fd = Ratio of the volume of dry effluent gas
to the gross calorific value of the fuel
from Method 19, dsm3/J (dscf/106 Btu).
Fc = Ratio of the volume of CO2 produced to
the gross calorific value of the fuel from
Method 19, dsm3/J (dscf/106 Btu).
(ii) Calculate the CO2 correction factor
for correcting measurement data to 15
percent O2, as follows:
X CO2 =
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(Eq. 5)
Where:
XCO2 = CO2 correction factor, percent.
5.9 = 20.9 percent O2¥15 percent O2, the
defined O2 correction value, percent.
(iii) Calculate the NOX and PM gas
concentrations adjusted to 15 percent O2
using CO2 as follows:
Cadj = Cd
X CO2
%CO 2
(Eq. 6)
Where:
Cadj = Calculated NOX or PM concentration
adjusted to 15 percent O2.
Cd = Measured concentration of NOX or PM,
uncorrected.
%CO2 = Measured CO2 concentration, dry
basis, percent.
(e) To determine compliance with the
NOX mass per unit output emission
limitation, convert the concentration of
NOX in the engine exhaust using
Equation 7 of this section:
ER = Emission rate in grams per KW-hour.
Cadj = Calculated PM concentration in grams
per standard cubic meter.
Q = Stack gas volumetric flow rate, in
standard cubic meter per hour.
T = Time of test run, in hours.
KW-hour = Energy output of the engine, in
KW.
Where:
PO 00000
5.9
Fo
(Eq. 7)
(f) To determine compliance with the
PM mass per unit output emission
limitation, convert the concentration of
PM in the engine exhaust using
Equation 8 of this section:
ER =
(Eq. 4)
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
ER11JY06.007
Cadj = Cd
Fc
ER11JY06.006
Owners and operators of stationary CI
ICE with a displacement of greater than
or equal to 30 liters per cylinder must
conduct performance tests according to
paragraphs (a) through (d) of this
section.
(a) Each performance test must be
conducted according to the
requirements in § 60.8 and under the
specific conditions that this subpart
specifies in table 7. The test must be
conducted within 10 percent of 100
percent peak (or the highest achievable)
load.
(b) You may not conduct performance
tests during periods of startup,
shutdown, or malfunction, as specified
in § 60.8(c).
(c) You must conduct three separate
test runs for each performance test
required in this section, as specified in
§ 60.8(f). Each test run must last at least
1 hour.
(2) You must normalize the NOX or
PM concentrations at the inlet and
outlet of the control device to a dry
basis and to 15 percent oxygen (O2)
using Equation 3 of this section, or an
equivalent percent carbon dioxide (CO2)
using the procedures described in
paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
0.209Fd
ER11JY06.005
Where:
Ci = concentration of NOX or PM at the
control device inlet,
Co = concentration of NOX or PM at the
control device outlet, and
R = percent reduction of NOX or PM
emissions.
§ 60.4213 What test methods and other
procedures must I use if I am an owner or
operator of a stationary CI internal
combustion engine with a displacement of
greater than or equal to 30 liters per
cylinder?
Where:
ER = Emission rate in grams per KW-hour.
Cd = Measured NOX concentration in ppm.
1.912x10¥3 = Conversion constant for ppm
NOX to grams per standard cubic meter
at 25 degrees Celsius.
Q = Stack gas volumetric flow rate, in
standard cubic meter per hour.
T = Time of test run, in hours.
KW-hour = Brake work of the engine, in KWhour.
(Eq. 2)
Fo =
ER11JY06.004
Ci − C o
× 100 = R
Ci
values obtained from Method 19,
Section 5.2, and the following equation:
11JYR2
ER11JY06.003
Where:
STD = The standard specified for that
pollutant in § 60.4204(a),
§ 60.4205(a), or § 60.4205(c).
Alternatively, stationary CI ICE that
are complying with the emission
standards for pre-2007 model year
engines in § 60.4204(a), § 60.4205(a), or
§ 60.4205(c) may follow the testing
procedures specified in § 60.4213, as
appropriate.
(d) To determine compliance with the
percent reduction requirement, you
must follow the requirements as
specified in paragraphs (d)(1) through
(3) of this section.
(1) You must use Equation 2 of this
section to determine compliance with
the percent reduction requirement:
ER11JY06.002
year engines in § 60.4204(a),
§ 60.4205(a), or § 60.4205(c) must not
exceed the NTE numerical
requirements, rounded to the same
number of decimal places as the
applicable standard in § 60.4204(a),
§ 60.4205(a), or § 60.4205(c), determined
from the equation in paragraph (c) of
this section.
ER11JY06.001
39178
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Notification, Reports, and Records for
Owners and Operators
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
§ 60.4214 What are my notification,
reporting, and recordkeeping requirements
if I am an owner or operator of a stationary
CI internal combustion engine?
(a) Owners and operators of nonemergency stationary CI ICE that are
greater than 2,237 KW (3,000 HP), or
have a displacement of greater than or
equal to 10 liters per cylinder, or are
pre-2007 model year engines that are
greater than 130 KW (175 HP) and not
certified, must meet the requirements of
paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) Submit an initial notification as
required in § 60.7(a)(1). The notification
must include the information in
paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (v) of this
section.
(i) Name and address of the owner or
operator;
(ii) The address of the affected source;
(iii) Engine information including
make, model, engine family, serial
number, model year, maximum engine
power, and engine displacement;
(iv) Emission control equipment; and
(v) Fuel used.
(2) Keep records of the information in
paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (iv) of this
section.
(i) All notifications submitted to
comply with this subpart and all
documentation supporting any
notification.
(ii) Maintenance conducted on the
engine.
(iii) If the stationary CI internal
combustion is a certified engine,
documentation from the manufacturer
that the engine is certified to meet the
emission standards.
(iv) If the stationary CI internal
combustion is not a certified engine,
documentation that the engine meets
the emission standards.
(b) If the stationary CI internal
combustion engine is an emergency
stationary internal combustion engine,
the owner or operator is not required to
submit an initial notification. Starting
with the model years in table 5 to this
subpart, if the emergency engine does
not meet the standards applicable to
non-emergency engines in the
applicable model year, the owner or
operator must keep records of the
operation of the engine in emergency
and non-emergency service that are
recorded through the non-resettable
hour meter. The owner must record the
time of operation of the engine and the
reason the engine was in operation
during that time.
(c) If the stationary CI internal
combustion engine is equipped with a
diesel particulate filter, the owner or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
operator must keep records of any
corrective action taken after the
backpressure monitor has notified the
owner or operator that the high
backpressure limit of the engine is
approached.
Special Requirements
§ 60.4215 What requirements must I meet
for engines used in Guam, American
Samoa, or the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands?
(a) Stationary CI ICE that are used in
Guam, American Samoa, or the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands are required to meet the
applicable emission standards in
§ 60.4205. Non-emergency stationary CI
ICE with a displacement of greater than
or equal to 30 liters per cylinder, must
meet the applicable emission standards
in § 60.4204(c).
(b) Stationary CI ICE that are used in
Guam, American Samoa, or the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands are not required to meet the fuel
requirements in § 60.4207.
§ 60.4216 What requirements must I meet
for engines used in Alaska?
(a) Prior to December 1, 2010, owners
and operators of stationary CI engines
located in areas of Alaska not accessible
by the Federal Aid Highway System
should refer to 40 CFR part 69 to
determine the diesel fuel requirements
applicable to such engines.
(b) The Governor of Alaska may
submit for EPA approval, by no later
than January 11, 2008, an alternative
plan for implementing the requirements
of 40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII, for
public-sector electrical utilities located
in rural areas of Alaska not accessible by
the Federal Aid Highway System. This
alternative plan must be based on the
requirements of section 111 of the Clean
Air Act including any increased risks to
human health and the environment and
must also be based on the unique
circumstances related to remote power
generation, climatic conditions, and
serious economic impacts resulting from
implementation of 40 CFR part 60,
subpart IIII. If EPA approves by
rulemaking process an alternative plan,
the provisions as approved by EPA
under that plan shall apply to the diesel
engines used in new stationary internal
combustion engines subject to this
paragraph.
§ 60.4217 What emission standards must I
meet if I am an owner or operator of a
stationary internal combustion engine
using special fuels?
(a) Owners and operators of stationary
CI ICE that do not use diesel fuel, or
who have been given authority by the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39179
Administrator under § 60.4207(d) of this
subpart to use fuels that do not meet the
fuel requirements of paragraphs (a) and
(b) of § 60.4207, may petition the
Administrator for approval of
alternative emission standards, if they
can demonstrate that they use a fuel that
is not the fuel on which the
manufacturer of the engine certified the
engine and that the engine cannot meet
the applicable standards required in
§ 60.4202 or § 60.4203 using such fuels.
(b) [Reserved]
General Provisions
§ 60.4218 What parts of the General
Provisions apply to me?
Table 8 to this subpart shows which
parts of the General Provisions in
§§ 60.1 through 60.19 apply to you.
Definitions
§ 60.4219
subpart?
What definitions apply to this
As used in this subpart, all terms not
defined herein shall have the meaning
given them in the CAA and in subpart
A of this part.
Combustion turbine means all
equipment, including but not limited to
the turbine, the fuel, air, lubrication and
exhaust gas systems, control systems
(except emissions control equipment),
and any ancillary components and subcomponents comprising any simple
cycle combustion turbine, any
regenerative/recuperative cycle
combustion turbine, the combustion
turbine portion of any cogeneration
cycle combustion system, or the
combustion turbine portion of any
combined cycle steam/electric
generating system.
Compression ignition means relating
to a type of stationary internal
combustion engine that is not a spark
ignition engine.
Diesel fuel means any liquid obtained
from the distillation of petroleum with
a boiling point of approximately 150 to
360 degrees Celsius. One commonly
used form is number 2 distillate oil.
Diesel particulate filter means an
emission control technology that
reduces PM emissions by trapping the
particles in a flow filter substrate and
periodically removes the collected
particles by either physical action or by
oxidizing (burning off) the particles in a
process called regeneration.
Emergency stationary internal
combustion engine means any stationary
internal combustion engine whose
operation is limited to emergency
situations and required testing and
maintenance. Examples include
stationary ICE used to produce power
for critical networks or equipment
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
39180
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(including power supplied to portions
of a facility) when electric power from
the local utility (or the normal power
source, if the facility runs on its own
power production) is interrupted, or
stationary ICE used to pump water in
the case of fire or flood, etc. Stationary
CI ICE used to supply power to an
electric grid or that supply power as
part of a financial arrangement with
another entity are not considered to be
emergency engines.
Engine manufacturer means the
manufacturer of the engine. See the
definition of ‘‘manufacturer’’ in this
section.
Fire pump engine means an
emergency stationary internal
combustion engine certified to NFPA
requirements that is used to provide
power to pump water for fire
suppression or protection.
Manufacturer has the meaning given
in section 216(1) of the Act. In general,
this term includes any person who
manufactures a stationary engine for
sale in the United States or otherwise
introduces a new stationary engine into
commerce in the United States. This
includes importers who import
stationary engines for sale or resale.
Maximum engine power means
maximum engine power as defined in
40 CFR 1039.801.
Model year means either:
(1) The calendar year in which the
engine was originally produced, or
(2) The annual new model production
period of the engine manufacturer if it
is different than the calendar year. This
must include January 1 of the calendar
year for which the model year is named.
It may not begin before January 2 of the
previous calendar year and it must end
by December 31 of the named calendar
year. For an engine that is converted to
a stationary engine after being placed
into service as a nonroad or other nonstationary engine, model year means the
calendar year or new model production
period in which the engine was
originally produced.
Other internal combustion engine
means any internal combustion engine,
except combustion turbines, which is
not a reciprocating internal combustion
engine or rotary internal combustion
engine.
Reciprocating internal combustion
engine means any internal combustion
engine which uses reciprocating motion
to convert heat energy into mechanical
work.
Rotary internal combustion engine
means any internal combustion engine
which uses rotary motion to convert
heat energy into mechanical work.
Spark ignition means relating to a
gasoline, natural gas, or liquefied
petroleum gas fueled engine or any
other type of engine with a spark plug
(or other sparking device) and with
operating characteristics significantly
similar to the theoretical Otto
combustion cycle. Spark ignition
engines usually use a throttle to regulate
intake air flow to control power during
normal operation. Dual-fuel engines in
which a liquid fuel (typically diesel
fuel) is used for CI and gaseous fuel
(typically natural gas) is used as the
primary fuel at an annual average ratio
of less than 2 parts diesel fuel to 100
parts total fuel on an energy equivalent
basis are spark ignition engines.
Stationary internal combustion engine
means any internal combustion engine,
except combustion turbines, that
converts heat energy into mechanical
work and is not mobile. Stationary ICE
differ from mobile ICE in that a
stationary internal combustion engine is
not a nonroad engine as defined at 40
CFR 1068.30 (excluding paragraph
(2)(ii) of that definition), and is not used
to propel a motor vehicle or a vehicle
used solely for competition. Stationary
ICE include reciprocating ICE, rotary
ICE, and other ICE, except combustion
turbines.
Subpart means 40 CFR part 60,
subpart IIII.
Useful life means the period during
which the engine is designed to
properly function in terms of reliability
and fuel consumption, without being
remanufactured, specified as a number
of hours of operation or calendar years,
whichever comes first. The values for
useful life for stationary CI ICE with a
displacement of less than 10 liters per
cylinder are given in 40 CFR
1039.101(g). The values for useful life
for stationary CI ICE with a
displacement of greater than or equal to
10 liters per cylinder and less than 30
liters per cylinder are given in 40 CFR
94.9(a).
Tables to Subpart IIII of Part 60
TABLE 1 TO SUBPART IIII OF PART 60.—EMISSION STANDARDS FOR STATIONARY PRE-2007 MODEL YEAR ENGINES WITH
A DISPLACEMENT OF <10 LITERS PER CYLINDER AND 2007–2010 MODEL YEAR ENGINES >2,237 KW (3,000 HP)
AND WITH A DISPLACEMENT OF <10 LITERS PER CYLINDER
[As stated in §§ 60.4201(b), 60.4202(b), 60.4204(a), and 60.4205(a), you must comply with the following emission standards]
Emission standards for stationary pre-2007 model year engines with a
displacement of <10 liters per cylinder and 2007–2010 model year engines >2,237 KW (3,000 HP) and with a displacement of <10 liters per
cylinder in g/KW-hr (g/HP-hr)
Maximum engine power
NMHC +
NOX
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
KW<8 (HP<11) ........................................................................................
8≤KW<19 (11≤HP<25) .............................................................................
19≤KW<37 (25≤HP<50) ...........................................................................
37≤KW<56 (50≤HP<75) ...........................................................................
56≤KW<75 (75≤HP<100) .........................................................................
75≤KW<130 (100≤HP<175) .....................................................................
130≤KW<225 (175≤HP<300) ...................................................................
225≤KW<450 (300≤HP<600) ...................................................................
450≤KW≤560 (600≤HP≤750) ...................................................................
KW>560 (HP>750) ..................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
HC
NOX
CO
PM
10.5 (7.8)
9.5 (7.1)
9.5 (7.1)
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
1.3 (1.0)
1.3 (1.0)
1.3 (1.0)
1.3 (1.0)
....................
....................
....................
9.2 (6.9)
9.2 (6.9)
9.2 (6.9)
9.2 (6.9)
9.2 (6.9)
9.2 (6.9)
9.2 (6.9)
8.0 (6.0)
6.6 (4.9)
5.5 (4.1)
....................
....................
....................
11.4 (8.5)
11.4 (8.5)
11.4 (8.5)
11.4 (8.5)
1.0 (0.75)
0.80 (0.60)
0.80 (0.60)
....................
....................
....................
0.54 (0.40)
0.54 (0.40)
0.54 (0.40)
0.54 (0.40)
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
39181
TABLE 2 TO SUBPART IIII OF PART 60.—EMISSION STANDARDS FOR 2008 MODEL YEAR AND LATER EMERGENCY
STATIONARY CI ICE <37 KW (50 HP) WITH A DISPLACEMENT OF <10 LITERS PER CYLINDER
[As stated in § 60.4202(a)(1), you must comply with the following emission standards]
Emission standards for 2008 model year and later
emergency stationary CI ICE <37 KW (50 HP) with a
displacement of <10 liters per cylinder in g/KW-hr (g/
HP-hr)
Engine power
Model
year(s)
KW<8 (HP<11) ................................................................................................................
8≤KW<19 (11≤HP<25) .....................................................................................................
19≤KW<37 (25≤HP<50) ...................................................................................................
2008+
2008+
2008+
NOX +
NMHC
7.5 (5.6)
7.5 (5.6)
7.5 (5.6)
CO
8.0 (6.0)
6.6 (4.9)
5.5 (4.1)
PM
0.40 (0.30)
0.40 (0.30)
0.30 (0.22)
TABLE 3 TO SUBPART IIII OF PART 60.—CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR STATIONARY FIRE PUMP ENGINES
[As stated in § 60.4202(d), you must certify new stationary fire pump engines beginning with the following model years:]
Starting model year engine manufacturers must
certify new stationary
fire pump engines according to § 60.4202(d)
Engine power
KW<75 (HP<100) ................................................................................................................................................................
75≤KW<130 (100≤HP<175) ................................................................................................................................................
130≤KW≤560 (175≤HP≤750) ...............................................................................................................................................
KW>560 (HP>750) ..............................................................................................................................................................
2011
2010
2009
2008
TABLE 4 TO SUBPART IIII OF PART 60.—EMISSION STANDARDS FOR STATIONARY FIRE PUMP ENGINES
[As stated in §§ 60.4202(d) and 60.4205(c), you must comply with the following emission standards for stationary fire pump engines]
NMHC +
NOX
Maximum engine power
Model year(s)
KW<8 (HP<11) .....................................................
2010 and earlier ...................................................
2011+ ....................................................................
2010 and earlier ...................................................
2011+ ....................................................................
2010 and earlier ...................................................
2011+ ....................................................................
2010 and earlier ...................................................
2011+ 1 .................................................................
2010 and earlier ...................................................
2011+ 1 .................................................................
2009 and earlier ...................................................
2010+ 2 .................................................................
2008 and earlier ...................................................
2009+ 3 .................................................................
2008 and earlier ...................................................
2009+ 3 .................................................................
2008 and earlier ...................................................
2009+ ....................................................................
2007 and earlier ...................................................
2008+ ....................................................................
8≤KW<19 (11≤HP<25) .........................................
19≤KW<37 (25≤HP<50) .......................................
37≤KW<56 (50≤HP<75) .......................................
56≤KW<75 (75≤HP<100) .....................................
75≤KW<130 (100≤HP<175) .................................
130≤KW<225 (175≤HP<300) ...............................
225≤KW<450 (300≤HP<600) ...............................
450≤KW≤560 (600≤HP≤750) ................................
KW>560 (HP>750) ...............................................
10.5
7.5
9.5
7.5
9.5
7.5
10.5
4.7
10.5
4.7
10.5
4.0
10.5
4.0
10.5
4.0
10.5
4.0
10.5
6.4
(7.8)
(5.6)
(7.1)
(5.6)
(7.1)
(5.6)
(7.8)
(3.5)
(7.8)
(3.5)
(7.8)
(3.0)
(7.8)
(3.0)
(7.8)
(3.0)
(7.8)
(3.0)
(7.8)
(4.8)
CO
8.0 (6.0)
....................
6.6 (4.9)
....................
5.5 (4.1)
....................
5.0 (3.7)
....................
5.0 (3.7)
....................
5.0 (3.7)
....................
3.5 (2.6)
....................
3.5 (2.6)
....................
3.5 (2.6)
....................
3.5 (2.6)
....................
PM
1.0
0.40
0.80
0.40
0.80
0.30
0.80
0.40
0.80
0.40
0.80
0.30
0.54
0.20
0.54
0.20
0.54
0.20
0.54
0.20
(0.75)
(0.30)
(0.60)
(0.30)
(0.60)
(0.22)
(0.60)
(0.30)
(0.60)
(0.30)
(0.60)
(0.22)
(0.40)
(0.15)
(0.40)
(0.15)
(0.40)
(0.15)
(0.40)
(0.15)
1 For model years 2011–2013, manufacturers, owners and operators of fire pump stationary CI ICE in this engine power category with a rated
speed of greater than 2,650 revolutions per minute (rpm) may comply with the emission limitations for 2010 model year engines.
2 For model years 2010–2012, manufacturers, owners and operators of fire pump stationary CI ICE in this engine power category with a rated
speed of greater than 2,650 rpm may comply with the emission limitations for 2009 model year engines.
3 In model years 2009–2011, manufacturers of fire pump stationary CI ICE in this engine power category with a rated speed of greater than
2,650 rpm may comply with the emission limitations for 2008 model year engines.
TABLE 5 TO SUBPART IIII OF PART 60.—LABELING AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW STATIONARY
EMERGENCY ENGINES
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
[You must comply with the labeling requirements in § 60.4210(f) and the recordkeeping requirements in § 60.4214(b) for new emergency
stationary CI ICE beginning in the following model years:]
Engine power
Starting model year
19≤KW<56 (25≤HP<75) ......................................................................................................................................................
56≤KW<130 (75≤HP<175) ..................................................................................................................................................
KW≥130 (HP≥175) ...............................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
2013
2012
2011
39182
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 6 TO SUBPART IIII OF PART 60.—OPTIONAL 3-MODE TEST CYCLE FOR STATIONARY FIRE PUMP ENGINES
[As stated in § 60.4210(g), manufacturers of fire pump engines may use the following test cycle for testing fire pump engines:]
Torque
(percent) 2
Weighting
factors
Mode No.
Engine speed 1
1 ....................................................................................
Rated ............................................................................
100
0.30
2 ....................................................................................
Rated ............................................................................
75
0.50
3 ....................................................................................
Rated ............................................................................
50
0.20
1 Engine speed:
2 Torque: NFPA
±2 percent of point.
certified nameplate HP for 100 percent point. All points should be ±2 percent of engine percent load value.
TABLE 7 TO SUBPART IIII OF PART 60.—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS FOR STATIONARY CI ICE WITH A
DISPLACEMENT OF ≥30 LITERS PER CYLINDER
[As stated in § 60.4213, you must comply with the following requirements for performance tests for stationary CI ICE with a displacement of ≥30
liters per cylinder:]
For each
Complying with the
requirement to
You must
1. Stationary CI internal
combustion engine with
a displacement of ≥30 liters per cylinder.
a. Reduce NOX emissions
by 90 percent or more.
i. Select the sampling port
location and the number
of traverse points;
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A.
ii. Measure O2 at the inlet
and outlet of the control
device;
(2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B of
40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
iii. If necessary, measure
moisture content at the
inlet and outlet of the
control device; and,
(3) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A,
Method 320 of 40 CFR
part 63, appendix A, or
ASTM D 6348–03 (incorporated by reference,
see § 60.17).
(4) Method 7E of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A,
Method 320 of 40 CFR
part 63, appendix A, or
ASTM D 6348–03 (incorporated by reference,
see § 60.17).
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40
CFR part 60, Appendix
A.
Using
iv. Measure NOX at the
inlet and outlet of the
control device.
b. Limit the concentration
of NOX in the stationary
CI internal combustion
engine exhaust.
i. Select the sampling port
location and the number
of traverse points;
ii. Determine the O2 concentration of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at
the sampling port location; and,
iii. If necessary, measure
moisture content of the
stationary internal combustion engine exhaust
at the sampling port location; and,
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
iv. Measure NOX at the
exhaust of the stationary
internal combustion engine.
c. Reduce PM emissions
by 60 percent or more.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:45 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
i. Select the sampling port
location and the number
of traverse points;
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B of
40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
(3) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A,
Method 320 of 40 CFR
part 63, appendix A, or
ASTM D 6348–03 (incorporated by reference,
see § 60.17).
(4) Method 7E of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A,
Method 320 of 40 CFR
part 63, appendix A, or
ASTM D 6348–03 (incorporated by reference,
see § 60.17).
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A.
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
According to the following
requirements
(a) Sampling sites must be
located at the inlet and
outlet of the control device.
(b) Measurements to determine O2 concentration
must be made at the
same time as the measurements for NOX concentration.
(c) Measurements to determine moisture content
must be made at the
same time as the measurements for NOX concentration.
(d) NOX concentration
must be at 15 percent
O2, dry basis. Results of
this test consist of the
average of the three 1hour or longer runs.
(a) If using a control device, the sampling site
must be located at the
outlet of the control device.
(b) Measurements to determine O2 concentration
must be made at the
same time as the measurement for NOX concentration.
(c) Measurements to determine moisture content
must be made at the
same time as the measurement for NOX concentration.
(d) NOX concentration
must be at 15 percent
O2, dry basis. Results of
this test consist of the
average of the three 1hour or longer runs.
(a) Sampling sites must be
located at the inlet and
outlet of the control device.
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
39183
TABLE 7 TO SUBPART IIII OF PART 60.—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS FOR STATIONARY CI ICE WITH A
DISPLACEMENT OF ≥30 LITERS PER CYLINDER—Continued
[As stated in § 60.4213, you must comply with the following requirements for performance tests for stationary CI ICE with a displacement of ≥30
liters per cylinder:]
Complying with the
requirement to
You must
According to the following
requirements
(2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B of
40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
iii. If necessary, measure
moisture content at the
inlet and outlet of the
control device; and
(3) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A.
iv. Measure PM at the inlet
and outlet of the control
device.
(4) Method 5 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A.
i. Select the sampling port
location and the number
of traverse points;
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40
CFR part 60, Appendix
A.
ii. Determine the O2 concentration of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at
the sampling port location; and
iii. If necessary, measure
moisture content of the
stationary internal combustion engine exhaust
at the sampling port location; and
iv. Measure PM at the exhaust of the stationary
internal combustion engine.
d. Limit the concentration
of PM in the stationary
CI internal combustion
engine exhaust.
Using
ii. Measure O2 at the inlet
and outlet of the control
device;
For each
(2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B of
40 CFR part 60, appendix A.
(b) Measurements to determine O2 concentration
must be made at the
same time as the measurements for PM concentration.
(c) Measurements to determine and moisture
content must be made
at the same time as the
measurements for PM
concentration.
(d) PM concentration must
be at 15 percent O2, dry
basis. Results of this
test consist of the average of the three 1-hour
or longer runs.
(a) If using a control device, the sampling site
must be located at the
outlet of the control device.
(b) Measurements to determine O2 concentration
must be made at the
same time as the measurements for PM concentration.
(c) Measurements to determine moisture content
must be made at the
same time as the measurements for PM concentration.
(d) PM concentration must
be at 15 percent O2, dry
basis. Results of this
test consist of the average of the three 1-hour
or longer runs.
(3) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A.
(4) Method 5 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A.
TABLE 8 TO SUBPART IIII OF PART 60.—APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART IIII
[As stated in § 60.4218, you must comply with the following applicable General Provisions:]
Subject of citation
Applies
to
subpart
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
General applicability of the General Provisions ...
Definitions .............................................................
Units and abbreviations ........................................
Address ................................................................
Determination of construction or modification ......
Review of plans ....................................................
Notification and Recordkeeping ...........................
Yes.
Yes ................
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes ................
§ 60.8 .............................
Performance tests ................................................
Yes ................
§ 60.9 .............................
§ 60.10 ...........................
§ 60.11 ...........................
Availability of information .....................................
State Authority ......................................................
Compliance with standards and maintenance requirements.
Circumvention .......................................................
Yes.
Yes.
No ..................
General Provisions
citation
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
§ 60.1
§ 60.2
§ 60.3
§ 60.4
§ 60.5
§ 60.6
§ 60.7
§ 60.12 ...........................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:45 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Explanation
Additional terms defined in § 60.4219.
Except that § 60.7 only applies as specified in
§ 60.4214(a).
Except that § 60.8 only applies to stationary CI
ICE with a displacement of (≥30 liters per cylinder and engines that are not certified.
Requirements are specified in subpart IIII.
Yes.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
39184
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 8 TO SUBPART IIII OF PART 60.—APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS TO SUBPART IIII—Continued
[As stated in § 60.4218, you must comply with the following applicable General Provisions:]
General Provisions
citation
Subject of citation
Applies
to
subpart
§ 60.13 ...........................
Monitoring requirements .......................................
Yes ................
§ 60.14
§ 60.15
§ 60.16
§ 60.17
§ 60.18
§ 60.19
Modification ..........................................................
Reconstruction ......................................................
Priority list .............................................................
Incorporations by reference .................................
General control device requirements ...................
General notification and reporting requirements ..
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
No.
Yes.
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
§ 85.2405
PART 85—[AMENDED]
4. The authority citation for part 85
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.
5. Section 85.2401 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(6), (a)(11), and
(a)(12) and adding paragraph (a)(13) to
read as follows:
I
§ 85.2401
apply?
To whom do these requirements
(a) * * *
(6) Nonroad compression-ignition
engines (See 40 CFR parts 89 and 1039);
*
*
*
*
*
(11) Heavy-duty highway gasoline
vehicles (evaporative emissions
certification only) (See 40 CFR part 86);
(12) Large nonroad spark-ignition
engines (engines >19 KW) (See 40 CFR
part 1048); and
(13) Stationary internal combustion
engines (See 40 CFR part 60, subpart
IIII).
*
*
*
*
*
I 6. Section 85.2403 is amended by
revising the definition for ‘‘Federal
certificate’’ in paragraph (a), revising
paragraphs (b)(8) and (b)(9), and adding
paragraphs (b)(10) and (b)(11) to read as
follows:
§ 85.2403
subpart?
What definitions apply to this
(a) * * *
*
*
*
*
Federal certificate is a Certificate of
Conformity issued by EPA which
signifies compliance with emission
requirements in any of the parts
specified in paragraph (b) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(8) 40 CFR part 1039;
(9) 40 CFR part 1048;
(10) 40 CFR part 1051; and
(11) 40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII.
I 7. Section 85.2405 is amended by
adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:45 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
How much are the fees?
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Fees for stationary CI internal
combustion engine certificate requests
shall be calculated in the same manner
as for NR CI certificate requests for
engines with a displacement less than
10 liters per cylinder, and in the same
manner as for marine engine certificate
requests for engines with a
displacement greater than or equal to 10
liters per cylinder. Fees for certificate
requests where the certificate would
apply to stationary and mobile engines
shall be calculated in the same manner
as fees for the certificate requests for the
applicable mobile source engines.
8. The authority citation for part 89
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.
9. Section 89.1 is amended by adding
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
I
Applicability.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) This part applies as specified in 40
CFR part 60 subpart IIII, to compressionignition engines subject to the standards
of 40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII.
I 10. Section 89.115 is amended by
adding paragraph (d)(11) to read as
follows:
§ 89.115
Application for certificate.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(11) A statement indicating whether
the engine family contains only nonroad
engines, only stationary engines, or
both.
I 11. Section 89.201 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 89.201
Applicability.
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
subpart. To the extent specified in 40
CFR part 60, subpart IIII, stationary
engines certified under this part and
subject to the standards of 40 CFR part
60, subpart IIII, may participate in the
averaging, banking, and trading program
described in this subpart.
PART 94—[AMENDED]
12. The authority citation for part 94
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.
13. Section 94.1 is amended by adding
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
I
§ 94.1
Applicability.
*
*
*
*
(d) This part applies as specified in 40
CFR part 60, subpart IIII, to
compression-ignition engines subject to
the standards of 40 CFR part 60, subpart
IIII.
I 14. Section 94.301 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 94.301
Applicability.
Marine engine families subject to the
standards of subpart A of this part are
eligible to participate in the certification
averaging, banking, and trading program
described in this subpart. The
provisions of this subpart apply to
manufacturers of new engines that are
subject to the emission standards of
§ 94.8. To the extent specified in 40 CFR
part 60, subpart IIII, stationary engines
certified under this part and subject to
the standards of 40 CFR part 60, subpart
IIII, may participate in the averaging,
banking, and trading program described
in this subpart.
PART 1039—[AMENDED]
15. The authority citation for part
1039 continues to read as follows:
I
Nonroad compression-ignition
engines subject to the provisions of
subpart A of this part are eligible to
participate in the averaging, banking,
and trading program described in this
PO 00000
Except that § 60.13 only applies to stationary CI
ICE with a displacement of (≥30 liters per cylinder.
*
PART 89—[AMENDED]
§ 89.1
Explanation
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.
16. Section 1039.1 is amended by
revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
I
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
§ 1039.1 Does this part apply for my
engines?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The definition of nonroad engine
in 40 CFR 1068.30 excludes certain
engines used in stationary applications.
These engines may be required by
subpart IIII of 40 CFR part 60 to comply
with some of the provisions of this part
1039; otherwise, these engines are only
required to comply with the
requirements in § 1039.20. In addition,
the prohibitions in 40 CFR 1068.101
restrict the use of stationary engines for
nonstationary purposes unless they are
certified under this part 1039, or under
the provisions of 40 CFR part 89 or 40
CFR part 94, to the same standards that
would apply to nonroad engines for the
same model year.
*
*
*
*
*
I 17. Section 1039.20 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (b) and
adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 1039.20 What requirements from this
part apply to excluded stationary engines?
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(a) You must add a permanent label
or tag to each new engine you produce
or import that is excluded under
§ 1039.1(c) as a stationary engine and is
not required by 40 CFR part 60, subpart
IIII, to meet the requirements of this part
1039, or the requirements of parts 89 or
94, that are equivalent to the
requirements applicable to nonroad or
marine engines for the same model year.
To meet labeling requirements, you
must do the following things:
(1) Attach the label or tag in one piece
so no one can remove it without
destroying or defacing it.
(2) Secure it to a part of the engine
needed for normal operation and not
normally requiring replacement.
(3) Make sure it is durable and
readable for the engine’s entire life.
(4) Write it in English.
(5) Follow the requirements in
§ 1039.135(g) regarding duplicate labels
if the engine label is obscured in the
final installation.
(b) Engine labels or tags required
under this section must have the
following information:
(1) Include the heading ‘‘EMISSION
CONTROL INFORMATION.’’
(2) Include your full corporate name
and trademark. You may instead
include the fill corporate name and
trademark of another company you
choose to designate.
(3) State the engine displacement (in
liters) and maximum engine power (or
in the case of fire pumps, NFPA
nameplate engine power).
(4) State: ‘‘THIS ENGINE IS
EXEMPTED FROM THE
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Jul 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
REQUIREMENTS OF 40 CFR PARTS 89
AND 1039 AS A ‘‘STATIONARY
ENGINE.’’ INSTALLING OR USING
THIS ENGINE IN ANY OTHER
APPLICATION MAY BE A VIOLATION
OF FEDERAL LAW SUBJECT TO CIVIL
PENALTY.’’
(c) Stationary engines required by 40
CFR part 60, subpart IIII, to meet the
requirements of this part 1039, or parts
89 or 94, must meet the labeling
requirements of 40 CFR 60.4210.
I 18. Section 1039.205 is amended by
revising paragraph (v) to read as follows:
§ 1039.205 What must I include in my
application?
*
*
*
*
*
(v) State whether your certification is
intended to include engines used in
stationary applications. State whether
your certification is limited for certain
engines. If this is the case, describe how
you will prevent use of these engines in
applications for which they are not
certified. This applies for engines such
as the following:
(1) Constant-speed engines.
(2) Engines used for transportation
refrigeration units that you certify under
the provisions of § 1039.645.
(3) Hand-startable engines certified
under the provisions of § 1039.101(c).
(4) Engines above 560 KW that are not
certified to emission standards for
generator-set engines.
*
*
*
*
*
I 19. Section 1039.705 is amended by
revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 1039.705 How do I generate and
calculate emission credits?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) In your application for
certification, base your showing of
compliance on projected production
volumes for engines whose point of first
retail sale is in the United States. As
described in § 1039.730, compliance
with the requirements of this subpart is
determined at the end of the model year
based on actual production volumes for
engines whose point of first retail sale
is in the United States. Do not include
any of the following engines to calculate
emission credits:
(1) Engines exempted under subpart G
of this part or under 40 CFR part 1068.
(2) Exported engines.
(3) Engines not subject to the
requirements of this part, such as those
excluded under § 1039.5.
(4) Engines in families that include
only stationary engines, except for
engines in families certified to standards
that are identical to standards
applicable under this part 1039 to
nonroad engines of the same type for the
same model year.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39185
(5) Any other engines, where we
indicate elsewhere in this part 1039 that
they are not to be included in the
calculations of this subpart.
PART 1065—[AMENDED]
20. The authority citation for part
1065 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.
21. Section 1065.1 is amended by
adding paragraph (a)(5) to read as
follows:
I
§ 1065.1
Applicability.
(a) * * *
(5) Stationary compression-ignition
engines certified using the provisions of
40 CFR part 1039, as indicated under 40
CFR part 60, subpart IIII, the standardsetting part for these engines.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 1068—[AMENDED]
22. The authority citation for part
1068 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.
23. Section 1068.1 is amended by
adding paragraph (a)(4) to read as
follows:
I
§ 1068.1
Does this part apply to me?
(a) * * *
(4) Stationary compression-ignition
engines certified to the provisions of 40
CFR part 1039, as indicated under 40
CFR part 60, subpart IIII.
*
*
*
*
*
I 24. Section 1068.310 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 1068.310 What are the exclusions for
imported engines?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Stationary engines. The definition
of nonroad engine in 40 CFR 1068.30
does not include certain engines used in
stationary applications. Such engines
may be subject to the standards of 40
CFR part 60. Engines that are excluded
from the definition of nonroad engine in
this part and not required to be certified
to standards under 40 CFR part 60 are
not subject to the restrictions on imports
in § 1068.301(b), but only if they are
properly labeled. Section 1068.101
restricts the use of stationary engines for
non-stationary purposes unless they are
certified under 40 CFR Part 60 to the
same standards that would apply to
nonroad engines for the same model
year.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 06–5968 Filed 7–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\11JYR2.SGM
11JYR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 11, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39154-39185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5968]
[[Page 39153]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Environmental Protection Agency
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
40 CFR Parts 60, 85 et al.
Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal
Combustion Engines; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 11, 2006 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 39154]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 60, 85, 89, 94, 1039, 1065, and 1068
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0029, FRL-8190-7]
RIN 2060-AM82
Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition
Internal Combustion Engines
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is promulgating standards of performance for stationary
compression ignition (CI) internal combustion engines (ICE). The
standards will implement section 111(b) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and
are based on the Administrator's determination that stationary CI ICE
cause, or contribute significantly to, air pollution that may
reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. The
intended effect of the standards is to require all new, modified, and
reconstructed stationary CI ICE to use the best demonstrated system of
continuous emission reduction, considering costs, non-air quality
health, and environmental and energy impacts, not just with add-on
controls, but also by eliminating or reducing the formation of these
pollutants. The final standards will reduce nitrogen oxides
(NOX) by an estimated 38,000 tons per year (tpy),
particulate matter (PM) by an estimated 3,000 tpy, sulfur dioxide
(SO2) by an estimated 9,000 tpy, non-methane hydrocarbons
(NMHC) by an estimated 600 tpy, and carbon monoxide (CO) by an
estimated 18,000 tpy in the year 2015.
DATES: The final rule is effective on September 11, 2006. The
incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in the final
rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of
September 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0029. We also rely on documents in Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0012 and incorporate that docket into the record for
the final rule. All documents in the docket are listed on the
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air
and Radiation Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
Docket telephone number is (202) 566-1742. The Public Reading Room is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for EPA Docket Center is (202)
566-1742. As of the date of signature, the physical docket is
temporarily unavailable due to flooding, but interested members of the
public can receive the list of documents in the docket or any
particular documents electronically by accessing the electronic docket
or by calling the contact person. We hope that the physical docket will
be accessible again before publication.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jaime Pagan, Energy Strategies
Group, Sector Policies and Programs Division (D243-01), U.S. EPA,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number (919)
541-5340; facsimile number (919) 541-5450; electronic mail address
pagan.jaime@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulated Entities. Categories and entities potentially regulated
by this action include:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of regulated
Category NAICS \1\ entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any manufacturer that produces or 2211 Electric power
any industry using a stationary generation,
internal combustion engine as transmission, or
defined in the final rule. distribution.
622110 Medical and surgical
hospitals.
335312 Motor and generator
manufacturing.
33391 Pump and compressor
manufacturing.
333992 Welding and soldering
equipment
manufacturing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System.
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
action. To determine whether your engine is regulated by this action,
you should examine the applicability criteria in Sec. 60.4200 of the
final rule. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed in the
preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Worldwide Web (WWW). In addition to being available in the docket,
an electronic copy of the final rule will be available on the WWW
through the Technology Transfer Network Web site (TTN). Following
signature, EPA will post a copy of the final rule on the TTN's policy
and guidance page for newly proposed or promulgated rules at https://
www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg. The TTN provides information and technology
exchange in various areas of air pollution control.
Judicial Review. Under CAA section 307(b)(1), judicial review of
the final rule is available only by filing a petition for review in the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia by September 11,
2006. Under CAA section 307(d)(7)(B), only an objection to the final
rule that was raised with reasonable specificity during the period for
public comment can be raised during judicial review. Moreover, under
CAA section 307(b)(2), the requirements established by this final
action may not be challenged separately in any civil or criminal
proceedings brought by EPA to enforce these requirements.
Section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA further provides that ``[o]nly an
objection to a rule or procedure which was raised with reasonable
specificity during the period for public comment (including any public
hearing) may be raised during judicial review.'' This section also
provides a mechanism for EPA to convene a proceeding for
reconsideration, ``[i]f the person raising an objection can demonstrate
to EPA that it was impracticable to raise such objection within [the
period for public comment] or if the grounds for such objection arose
after the period for public comment (but within the same
[[Page 39155]]
time specified for judicial review) and if such objection is of central
relevance to the outcome of the rule.'' Any person seeking to make such
a demonstration to EPA should submit a Petition for Reconsideration to
the Office of the Administrator, U.S. EPA, Room 3000, Ariel Rios
Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, with a
copy to both the person(s) listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section, and the Director of the Air and Radiation
Law Office, Office of General Counsel (Mail Code 2344A), U.S. EPA, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20004.
Background Information Document. EPA proposed new source
performance standards (NSPS) for CI ICE on July 11, 2005 (70 FR 39870),
and received 47 comment letters on the proposal. A background
information document (BID) (``Response to Public Comments on Proposed
Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal
Combustion Engines,'') containing EPA's responses to each public
comment and the Economic Impact Analysis Report are available in Docket
ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0029.
Organization of This Document. The following outline is provided to
aid in locating information in the preamble.
I. Background
II. Summary of the Final Rule
A. What is the source category regulated by the final rule?
B. What are the pollutants regulated by the final rule?
C. What sources are subject to the final rule?
D. What are the final standards?
E. What are the requirements for sources that are modified or
reconstructed?
F. What are the requirements for demonstrating compliance?
G. What are the monitoring requirements?
H. What are the reporting and recordkeeping requirements?
III. Summary of Significant Changes Since Proposal
A. Applicability
B. Fuel Requirements
C. Maintenance and Testing
D. Emission Standards
E. Recordkeeping
IV. Summary of Responses to Major Comments
A. Applicability/Effective Date
B. Modeling Mobile Source Program
C. Fuel Requirements
D. Maintenance and Testing
E. Emission Standards
F. Military Training Engines
V. Summary of Environmental, Energy and Economic Impacts
A. What are the air quality impacts?
B. What are the cost impacts?
C. What are the economic impacts?
D. What are the non-air health, environmental and energy
impacts?
E. What are the benefits?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
J. Congressional Review Act
I. Background
This action promulgates NSPS that will apply to new stationary CI
ICE. New source performance standards implement section 111(b) of the
CAA, and are issued for categories of sources which cause, or
contribute significantly to, air pollution which may reasonably be
anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. The standards apply
to new stationary sources of emissions, i.e., sources whose
construction, reconstruction, or modification begins after a standard
for those sources is proposed. NSPS require these sources to control
emissions to the level achievable by best demonstrated technology
(BDT), considering costs and any non-air quality health and
environmental impacts and energy requirements.
II. Summary of the Final Rule
A. What is the source category regulated by the final rule?
The final rule applies to stationary CI ICE. A stationary internal
combustion engine means any internal combustion engine, except
combustion turbines, that converts heat energy into mechanical work and
is not mobile. Stationary ICE differ from mobile ICE in that a
stationary internal combustion engine is not a nonroad engine as
defined at 40 CFR 1068.30 (excluding paragraph (2)(ii) of that
definition), and is not used to propel a motor vehicle or a vehicle
used solely for competition. Stationary ICE include reciprocating ICE,
rotary ICE, and other ICE, except combustion turbines. A CI engine
means a type of stationary internal combustion engine that is not a
spark ignition (SI) engine. A SI engine means a gasoline, natural gas,
or liquefied petroleum gas fueled engine or any other type of engine
with a spark plug (or other sparking device) and with operating
characteristics significantly similar to the theoretical Otto
combustion cycle. Spark ignition engines usually use a throttle to
regulate intake air flow to control power during normal operation.
Dual-fuel engines in which a liquid fuel (typically diesel fuel) is
used for CI and gaseous fuel (typically natural gas) is used as the
primary fuel at an annual average ratio of less than 2 parts diesel
fuel to 100 parts total fuel on an energy equivalent basis are SI
engines.
B. What are the pollutants regulated by the final rule?
The pollutants to be regulated by the final rule are
NOX, PM, CO, and NMHC.\1\ Emissions of sulfur oxides
(SOX) will also be reduced through the use of lower sulfur
fuel. Smoke emissions will also be reduced through the implementation
of the final standards. Emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAP)
from these engines have been, or will be, regulated in separate
rulemakings promulgated under CAA section 112.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Primarily for reasons of testing ease and because engine
manufacturers are familiar with testing for NMHC, this rule, as with
previous rules promulgating emission standards for mobile source
internal combustion engines, uses NMHC rather than VOC as the metric
for measuring organic compounds that can contribute to ozone
formation. C.f. 40 CFR part 60, Method 25 (Determination of Total
Gaseous Nonmethane Organic Emissions as Carbon.)
\2\ Emissions of HAP from stationary reciprocating internal
combustion engines (RICE) located at major sources were the subject
of a final rule published on June 15, 2004 (69 FR 33473). Emissions
of HAP from other stationary RICE will be the subject of another
rulemaking that will be promulgated no later than December 20, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. What sources are subject to the final rule?
The affected source for the CI ICE NSPS is each stationary CI
internal combustion engine whose construction, modification or
reconstruction commenced after July 11, 2005. The date of construction
is the date the engine is ordered by the owner or operator. Stationary
CI ICE manufactured prior to April 1, 2006, that are not fire pump
engines are not subject to the final rule, unless the engines are
modified or reconstructed after July 11, 2005. Stationary fire pump CI
ICE manufactured prior to July 1, 2006, are not subject to the final
rule either, unless the engines are modified or reconstructed after
July 11, 2005. Manufacturers of 2007 and later model year stationary CI
ICE that are not fire pumps are subject to the final rule. For fire
pump engines, the date of manufacturing is the date the engine is built
into a certified National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) fire pump
engine. Manufacturers of fire
[[Page 39156]]
pump engines are subject to the final rule beginning with the first
model year that new fire pump engines in a particular horsepower class
must meet standards more stringent than Tier 1 standards, which can be
any model year from 2008 to 2011, depending on the horsepower of the
engine.
Owners and operators of new stationary CI ICE who are subject to
the final rule (as discussed above) must meet the requirements of Sec.
60.4208 of the final rule, which restricts the installation of engines
subject to outdated emission standards. This restriction applies only
to the installation of new engines subject to the final rule, and does
not apply to the installation of previously used engines.
D. What are the final standards?
1. Overview
The format of the final standard is an output-based emission
standard for PM, NOX, CO, and NMHC in units of emissions
mass per unit work performed (grams per kilowatt-hour (g/KW-hr)) and
smoke standards as a percentage. The emission standards are generally
modeled after EPA's standards for nonroad and marine diesel engines.
The nonroad diesel engine standards are phased in over several years
and have Tiers with increasing levels of stringency. The engine model
year in which the Tiers take effect varies for different size ranges of
engines. The Tier 1 standards were phased in for nonroad diesel engines
beginning in 1996 to 2000. The Tier 2 nonroad CI standards are phased
in starting from 2001 to 2006, and the Tier 3 limits are phased in
starting from 2006 to 2008. The Tier 3 limits apply for engines greater
than or equal to 50 and less than or equal to 750 horsepower (HP) only.
Tier 4 limits for nonroad engines are phased in beginning in 2008.
2. Final Standards for Engine Manufacturers
Engine manufacturers must meet the emission standards of the rule
during the useful life of the engine. a. 2007 Model Year and Later Non-
Emergency Stationary CI ICE <=3,000 HP and With a Displacement <10
Liters per Cylinder. The standards require that engine manufacturers
certify their 2007 model year and later non-emergency stationary CI ICE
with a maximum engine power less than or equal to 3,000 HP and a
displacement of less than 10 liters per cylinder to the Tier 2 through
Tier 4 nonroad diesel engine standards as shown in table 1 of this
preamble, as applicable, for all pollutants, for the same model year
and maximum engine power.
Table 1.--NOX, NMHC, CO, and PM Emission Standards in g/KW-hr (g/HP-hr) for 2007 Model Year and Later Non-
Emergency Engines <=3,000 HP and With a Displacement <10 Liters per Cylinder and 2011 Model Year and Later Non-
Emergency Engines >3,000 HP and With a Displacement <10 Liters per Cylinder a
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model
Maximum engine power year(s) NMHC + NOX NMHC NOX CO PM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KW<8 (HP<11)...................... 2007 7.5 (5.6) ........... ........... 8.0 (6.0) 0.80 (0.60)
2008+ ........... ........... ........... ........... 0.40 (0.30)
8<=KW<19.......................... 2007 ........... ........... ........... 6.6 (4.9) 0.80 (0.60)
(11<=HP<25)....................... 2008+ ........... ........... ........... ........... 0.40 (0.30)
19<=KW<37 (25<=HP<50)............. 2007 7.5 (5.6) ........... ........... 5.5 (4.1) 0.60 (0.45)
2008-2012 ........... ........... ........... ........... 0.30 (0.22)
2013+ 4.7 (3.5) ........... ........... ........... 0.03 (0.02)
37<=KW<56 (50<=HP<75)............. 2007 7.5 (5.6) ........... ........... 5.0 (3.7) 0.40 (0.30)
2008-2012 4.7 (3.5) ........... ........... ........... \a\ 0.30
(0.22)
2013+ ........... ........... ........... ........... 0.03 (0.02)
56<=KW<75 (75<=HP<100)............ 2007 7.5 (5.6) ........... ........... ........... 0.40 (0.30)
2008-2011 4.7 (3.5) ........... ........... ........... ...........
2012-2013 ........... \b\ 0.19 \b\ 0.40 5.0 (3.7) 0.02 (0.01)
(0.14) (0.30)
2014+ ........... 0.19 (0.14) 0.40 (0.30)
75<=KW<130 (100<=HP<175).......... 2007 4.0 (3.0) ........... ........... ........... 0.30 (0.22)
2008-2011
2012-2013 ........... \b\ 0.19 \b\ 0.40 5.0 (3.7) 0.02 (0.01)
(0.14) (0.30)
2014+ ........... 0.19 (0.14) 0.40 (0.30)
130<=KW<560 (175<=HP<750)......... 2007-2010 4.0 (3.0) ........... ........... 3.5 (2.6) 0.20 (0.15)
2011-2013 ........... \b\ 0.19 \b\ 0.40 ........... 0.02 (0.01)
(0.14) (0.30)
2014+ ........... 0.19 (0.14) 0.40 (0.30)
KW>560 (HP>750)................... 2007-2010 6.4 (4.8) ........... ........... 3.5 (2.6) 0.20 (0.15)
Except generator sets............. 2011-2014 ........... 0.40 (0.30) 3.5 (2.6) ........... 0.10
(0.075)
2015+ ........... 0.19 (0.14) 3.5 (2.6) ........... 0.04 (0.03)
Generator sets 560900 (HP>1200)... 2007-2010 6.4 (4.8) ........... ........... 3.5 (2.6) 0.20 (0.15)
2011-2014 ........... 0.40 (0.30) 0.67 (0.50) ........... 0.10
(0.075)
2015+ ........... 0.19 (0.14) ........... ........... 0.03 (0.02)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ A manufacturer has the option of skipping the 0.30 g/KW-hr PM standard for all 37-56 KW (50-75 HP) engines.
The 0.03 g/KW-hr standard would then take effect 1 year earlier for all 37-56 KW (50-75 HP) engines, in 2012.
The Tier 3 standard (0.40 g/KW-hr) would be in effect until 2012.
\b\ 50 percent of the engines produced have to meet the NOX + NMHC standard, and 50 percent have to meet the
separate NOX and NMHC limits.
b. 2007 Model Year and Later Non-Emergency Stationary CI ICE >3,000
HP and With a Displacement <10 Liters per Cylinder. The standards
require that engine manufacturers certify their 2007 through 2010 model
year non-
[[Page 39157]]
emergency stationary CI ICE with a maximum engine power greater than
3,000 HP and a displacement of less than 10 liters per cylinder to the
emission standards shown in table 2 of this preamble. For 2011 model
year and later non-emergency stationary CI ICE with a maximum engine
power greater than 3,000 HP and a displacement of less than 10 liters
per cylinder, manufacturers must certify these engines to the Tier 4
nonroad diesel engine standards as shown in table 1 of this preamble,
as applicable, for all pollutants, for the same model year and maximum
engine power.
Table 2.--NOX, NMHC, CO, and PM Emission Standards in g/KW-hr (g/HP-hr) for Pre-2007 Model Year Engines With a
Displacement <10 Liters per Cylinder and 2007-2010 Model Year Engines >3,000 HP and With a Displacement <10
Liters per Cylinder
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum engine power NMHC + NOX HC NOX CO PM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KW<8 (HP<11)................................ 10.5 (7.8) ........... ........... 8.0 (6.0) 1.0 (0.75)
8<=KW<19 (11<=HP<25)........................ 9.5 (7.1) ........... ........... 6.6 (4.9) 0.80 (0.60)
19<=KW<37 (25<=HP<50)....................... 9.5 (7.1) ........... ........... 5.5 (4.1) 0.80 (0.60)
37<=KW<56 (50<=HP<75)....................... .............. ........... 9.2 (6.9) ........... ...........
56<=KW<75 (75<=HP<100)...................... .............. ........... 9.2 (6.9) ........... ...........
75<=KW<130 (100<=HP<175).................... .............. ........... 9.2 (6.9) ........... ...........
130<=KW<225 (175<=HP<300)................... .............. 1.3 (1.0) 9.2 (6.9) 11.4 (8.5) 0.54 (0.40)
225<=KW<450 (300<=HP<600)................... .............. 1.3 (1.0) 9.2 (6.9) 11.4 (8.5) 0.54 (0.40)
450<=KW<=560 (600<=HP<=750)................. .............. 1.3 (1.0) 9.2 (6.9) 11.4 (8.5) 0.54 (0.40)
KW>560 (HP>750)............................. .............. 1.3 (1.0) 9.2 (6.9) 11.4 (8.5) 0.54 (0.40)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c. 2007 Model Year and Later Non-Emergency Stationary CI ICE with
a Displacement >=10 and <30 Liters per Cylinder. The standards require
that engine manufacturers certify their 2007 model year and later non-
emergency stationary CI ICE with a displacement of greater than or
equal to 10 liters per cylinder and less than 30 liters per cylinder to
the certification emission standards for new marine CI engines in 40
CFR 94.8, as applicable, for all pollutants, for the same displacement
and maximum engine power. These emission standards are shown in table 3
of this preamble.
Table 3.-- NOX, THC, CO, and PM Emission Standards in g/KW-hr for 2007
Model Year and Later Stationary CI ICE With a Displacement >=10 and <30
Liters per Cylinder
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engine size--liters per cylinder, rated
power THC + NOX CO PM
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.0<=displacement<15.0 All Power Levels.. 7.8 5.0 0.27
15.0<=displacement<20.0 <3,300 KW........ 8.7 5.0 0.50
15.0<=displacement<20.0 >=3,300 KW....... 9.8 5.0 0.50
20.0<=displacement<25.0 All Power Levels. 9.8 5.0 0.50
25.0<=displacement<30.0 All Power Levels. 11.0 5.0 0.50
------------------------------------------------------------------------
d. 2007 Model Year and Later Emergency Stationary CI ICE <30 Liters
per Cylinder. The standards require that manufacturers certify their
2007 model year and later emergency stationary CI ICE less than or
equal to 3,000 HP and with a displacement of less than 10 liters per
cylinder that are not fire pump engines to Tier 2 through Tier 3
nonroad CI engine emission standards, and Tier 4 nonroad CI engine
standards that do not require add-on control, according to the nonroad
diesel engine schedule. Manufacturers must certify their 2007 through
2010 model year emergency stationary CI ICE greater than 3,000 HP and
with a displacement less than 10 liters per cylinder that are not fire
pump engines to the emission standards shown in table 2 of this
preamble. Manufacturers must certify their 2011 model year and later
emergency stationary CI ICE that are greater than 3,000 HP and with a
displacement less than 10 liters per cylinder that are not fire pumps
to Tier 2 and Tier 3 nonroad CI engine standards, and to Tier 4 nonroad
CI engine standards that do not require add-on control. Manufacturers
are required to certify their 2007 model year and later emergency
stationary CI ICE with a displacement of greater than or equal to 10
liters per cylinder and less than 30 liters per cylinder to the
certification emission standards for new marine CI engines in 40 CFR
94.8. Manufacturers must certify their post-Tier 1 emergency fire pumps
to the emission standards shown in table 4 of this preamble.
3. Final Standards for Owners and Operators
Owners and operators of stationary CI ICE are required to meet the
emission standards in the final rule over the entire life of the
engine.
a. Stationary CI ICE with a Displacement <30 Liters per Cylinder.
Owners and operators that purchase pre-2007 model year stationary CI
ICE with a displacement of less than 10 liters per cylinder that are
not fire pump engines must meet the emission standards for pre-2007
model year engines, which are shown in table 2 of this preamble. Owners
and operators that purchase pre-2007 model year stationary CI ICE with
a displacement of greater than or equal to 10 and less than 30 liters
per cylinder that are not fire pump engines must meet the emissions
standards in 40 CFR 94.8(a)(1). Section 94.8(a)(1) specifies the
following NOX limits: 17.0 g/KW-hr (12.7 g/HP-hr) when the
maximum test speed is less than 130 revolutions per minute (rpm); 45.0
x N-0.20 when maximum test speed is at least 130 but less
than 2000 rpm, where N is the maximum test speed of the engine in rpm;
and 9.8 g/KW-hr (7.3 g/HP-hr) when maximum test speed is 2000 rpm or
more.
Owners and operators that purchase fire pump engines must meet the
emission standards in table 4 to the final rule.
[[Page 39158]]
Owners and operators that purchase 2007 model year and later
stationary CI ICE with a displacement of less than 30 liters per
cylinder that are not fire pump engines, and post-Tier 1 fire pump
engines, must purchase an engine that is certified by the manufacturer
according to the provisions of the rule.
b. Stationary CI ICE with a Displacement >=30 Liters per Cylinder.
Owners and operators of stationary CI ICE with a displacement of
greater than or equal to 30 liters per cylinder are required to reduce
NOX emissions by 90 percent or more, or alternatively they
must limit the emissions of NOX in the stationary CI
internal combustion engine exhaust to 1.6 g/KW-hr (1.2 g/HP-hr). Owners
and operators of stationary CI ICE with a displacement of greater than
or equal to 30 liters per cylinder are also required to reduce PM
emissions by 60 percent or more, or alternatively they must limit the
emissions of PM in the stationary CI internal combustion engine exhaust
to 0.15 grams per KW-hour (0.11 grams per HP-hour).
4. Final Standards for Manufacturers and Owners and Operators of
Emergency Stationary Fire Pump Engines
The rule requires that owners and operators of emergency fire pump
engines meet the emission standards shown in table 4 of this preamble,
for all pollutants, for the same model year and NFPA nameplate engine
power. Starting with the model year in which the most stringent
standards begin for each HP range, emergency fire pumps must be
certified to the emission standards shown in table 4 of this preamble.
Emergency fire pump engines between 50 and 600 HP with a rated speed of
greater than 2,650 rpm have been given an additional 3 years to meet
the most stringent emission standards.
Table 4.--NOX, NMHC, CO, and PM Emission Standards in g/KW-hr (g/HP-hr) for Emergency Fire Pump Engines
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum engine power Model year(s) NMHC + NOX CO PM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KW<8 (HP<11).............................. 2010 and earlier............. 10.5 (7.8) 8.0 (6.0) 1.0 (0.75)
2011 +....................... 7.5 (5.6) ........... 0.40 (0.30)
8<=KW<19 (11<=HP<25)...................... 2010 and earlier............. 9.5 (7.1) 6.6 (4.9) 0.80 (0.60)
2011 +....................... 7.5 (5.6) ........... 0.40 (0.30)
19<=KW<37 (25<=HP<50)..................... 2010 and earlier............. 9.5 (7.1) 5.5 (4.1) 0.80 (0.60)
2011 +....................... 7.5 (5.6) ........... 0.30 (0.22)
37<=KW<56 (50<=HP<75)..................... 2010 and earlier............. 10.5 (7.8) 5.0 (3.7) 0.80 (0.60)
2011 + \a\................... 4.7 (3.5) ........... 0.40 (0.30)
56<=KW<75 (75<=HP<100).................... 2010 and earlier............. 10.5 (7.8) 5.0 (3.7) 0.80 (0.60)
2011 + \a\................... 4.7 (3.5) ........... 0.40 (0.30)
75<=KW<130 (100<=HP<175).................. 2009 and earlier............. 10.5 (7.8) 5.0 (3.7) 0.80 (0.60)
2010 + \a\................... 4.0 (3.0) ........... 0.30 (0.22)
130<=KW<225 (175<=HP<300)................. 2008 and earlier............. 10.5 (7.8) 3.5 (2.6) 0.54 (0.40)
2009 + \a\................... 4.0 (3.0) ........... 0.20 (0.15)
225<=KW<450 (300<=HP<600)................. 2008 and earlier............. 10.5 (7.8) 3.5 (2.6) 0.54 (0.40)
2009 + \a\................... 4.0 (3.0) ........... 0.20 (0.15)
450<=KW<=560 (600<=HP<=750)............... 2008 and earlier............. 10.5 (7.8) 3.5 (2.6) 0.54 (0.40)
2009 +....................... 4.0 (3.0) ........... 0.20 (0.15)
KW>560 (HP>750)........................... 2007 and earlier............. 10.5 (7.8) 3.5 (2.6) 0.54 (0.40)
2008 +....................... 6.4 (4.8) ........... 0.20 (0.15)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Emergency fire pump engines with a rated speed of greater than 2,650 rpm are allowed an additional 3 years
to meet these standards.
5. Fuel Requirements
In addition to emission standards, the final rule requires that
beginning October 1, 2007, owners and operators of stationary CI ICE
that use diesel fuel must only use diesel fuel meeting the requirements
of 40 CFR 80.510(a), which requires that diesel fuel have a maximum
sulfur content of 500 parts per million (ppm) and either a minimum
cetane index of 40 or a maximum aromatic content of 35 volume percent.
Beginning October 1, 2010, owners and operators of stationary CI ICE
with a displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder that use diesel
fuel must only use diesel fuel meeting the requirements of 40 CFR
80.510(b) for nonroad diesel fuel, which requires that diesel fuel have
a maximum sulfur content of 15 ppm and either a minimum cetane index of
40 or a maximum aromatic content of 35 volume percent. The final rule
does not contain a standard for SO2; the use of low sulfur
diesel fuel will result in lower emissions of SO2. EPA does
not expect that the lubricity of the ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD)
will be an issue because additives can be added to ULSD to achieve a
sufficient lubricity.
Manufacturers of stationary CI ICE with a displacement of 30 liters
per cylinder or more indicated that they are able to operate their
engines on 500 ppm sulfur fuel, but they do not have any experience
operating their engines on 15 ppm sulfur fuel, and they need to perform
testing to ensure there are no problems with the lubricity of the ULSD
fuel. The use of ULSD is not required for owners and operators of these
engines.
The fuel requirements of this rule only apply to engines that are
subject to this rule, i.e., those engines that meet the applicability
provisions of Sec. 60.4200 of the final rule.
E. What are the requirements for sources that are modified or
reconstructed?
The final standards apply to stationary CI ICE that are modified or
reconstructed after July 11, 2005. The guidelines for determining
whether a source is modified or reconstructed are given in 40 CFR 60.14
and 40 CFR 60.15, respectively. Stationary CI ICE that are modified or
reconstructed must meet the emission standards for the model year in
which the engine was originally new, not the year the engine was
modified or reconstructed. Therefore, a pre-2007 model year engine
modified after 2007 must meet the emission standards for pre-2007 model
year engines.
[[Page 39159]]
F. What are the requirements for demonstrating compliance?
1. Engine Manufacturers
Manufacturers of stationary CI ICE must demonstrate compliance with
the final rule by certifying that their 2007 model year and later
stationary CI ICE with displacement less than 30 liters per cylinder
meet the emission standards in the final rule using the certification
procedures in subpart B of 40 CFR part 89, subpart C of 40 CFR part 94,
or subpart C of 40 CFR part 1039, as applicable, and must test their
engines as specified in those parts. Manufacturers of fire pump engines
do not have to certify Tier 1 engines and, for post-Tier 1 engines, may
use the optional test cycle provided in table 6 to the final rule.
Manufacturers of certified stationary CI ICE that must meet the
emission standards of 40 CFR part 1039 must also meet the emission-
related warranty requirements of 40 CFR 1039.120; the provisions in 40
CFR 1039.125 and 40 CFR 1039.130, which require the engine manufacturer
to provide engine installation and maintenance instructions to buyers;
the engine labeling requirements in 40 CFR 1039.135; and the general
compliance provisions in 40 CFR part 1068. Manufacturers of certified
stationary CI ICE that must meet the emission standards of 40 CFR part
89 or 40 CFR part 94 must meet the corresponding provisions of 40 CFR
part 89 or 40 CFR part 94 for engines that would be covered by that
part if they were nonroad (including marine) engines. After the Tier 4
standards take effect, manufacturers of emergency stationary CI ICE
that do not meet the standards for non-emergency engines must add to
each such emergency engine a permanent label which states that the
engine is for emergency use only. Engine manufacturers must also
specify in the owner's manual that operation of emergency engines is
limited to emergency operations and required maintenance and testing.
Engine manufacturers that certify an engine family or families to
standards under the final rule that are identical to standards
applicable under 40 CFR part 89, 40 CFR part 94, or 40 CFR part 1039
for that model year may certify any such family that contains both
nonroad (including marine) and stationary engines as a single engine
family and/or may include any such family containing stationary engines
in the averaging, banking and trading (ABT) provisions applicable for
such engines under those parts.
EPA has used ABT often in the context of the nonroad engine
program. The averaging provisions basically allow manufacturers to
certify certain engine families to emission levels more stringent than
required and to certify other engine families to levels less stringent
than required, as long as the average emission levels to which these
engine families are certified are at least equal to the appropriate
standards. The banking program allows manufacturers to generate credits
by certifying engine families to more stringent standards than required
in a particular year and to use such credits in later years. The
trading provisions allow engine manufacturers to trade credits with
other engine manufacturers covered by the same requirements. The ABT
provisions include significant restrictions and compliance
requirements, including upper limits on the level to which any engine
family may certify.
Under the nonroad engine program, the ABT provisions, where
applied, are important elements in our determination of the standards
of performance that represent ``the greatest degree of emission
reduction achievable through the application of technology which the
Administrator determines will be available for the engines * * * to
which the standards apply, giving appropriate consideration to the cost
of applying such technology within the period of time available to
manufacturers and to noise, energy and safety factors * * *.'' See CAA
section 213(a)(3) and Natural Resources Defense Council v. Thomas, 805
F.2d 410, 425 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (upholding EPA regulations allowing
manufacturers to meet emission standards for heavy-duty engines by
averaging among engine families); see also discussions at 69 FR 38996
(June 29, 2004) and 55 FR 30584, 93-99 (July 26, 1990).
Similarly, we believe that these ABT provisions are essential
elements in our determination that the final standards reflect best
BDT. The flexibility provided by the ABT provisions allows the
manufacturer to adjust its compliance for engine families for which
coming into compliance with the standards will be particularly
difficult or costly, without special delays or exceptions having to be
written into the final rule. Emission-credit programs also create an
incentive for the early introduction of new technology (for example, to
generate credits in early years to create compliance flexibility for
later engines), which allows certain engine families to act as
trailblazers for new technology. This improves the feasibility of
achieving the standards for the entire population of regulated engines.
EPA has concluded as a factual matter, as reflected in this final rule,
that an ABT program, operated at the level of the manufacturer,
represents the best system of emissions reductions, considering all
relevant factors.
We believe the ABT provisions are appropriate for this program. The
ABT provisions are applicable to engine manufacturers, who manufacture
numerous engines for use in all areas of the country, as opposed to the
final owner/operators of the units. These standards will apply to
hundreds of different engine families that will be used in tens of
thousands of different engines. The flexibility provided by the ABT
program is an important instrument for manufacturers to use in meeting
the stringent standards of this program affecting a large number of
engine families.
We are finalizing minor revisions to several existing mobile source
regulations to help incorporate several of these provisions.
EPA is requiring that manufacturers of stationary CI ICE that are
seeking certificates of conformity be subject to the same fee
provisions as those promulgated for comparable land-based and marine
nonroad engines in EPA's most recent fees rulemaking (see 69 FR 26222,
May 11, 2004) and be required to comply with the fees rule in the same
manner as manufacturers already subject to the fees regulations.
Because EPA will be providing certificates of conformity to stationary
CI ICE manufacturers and, thus is providing a service or thing of value
to the manufacturers, the Independent Offices Appropriations Act (31
U.S.C. 9701) authorizes such a fee collection. Having reviewed the
recent fees rule for the motor vehicle and engine compliance program,
and its associated cost study which examined EPA's incurred cost of
compliance services, we believe that the fees provided in that rule are
appropriate for the comparable costs of administering the compliance
program for the engines associated with this final rule. These engines
are subject to the same general compliance regime as land-based nonroad
CI engines and, for those with a displacement between 10 and 30 liters
per cylinder, marine engines covered by the existing fees rule. We
believe fees for each respective request for certification of
conformity for stationary CI ICE should have the same fee amount as for
those engines.
Under the provisions of the existing fees rule, the initial fees
for certification applications received in the 2004 and 2005 calendar
years (for example, $1,822 and $826, respectively, for land-based
nonroad CI engines and marine engines) are adjusted on an annual basis
[[Page 39160]]
based on several factors, including any changes in the number of
certificates in the respective fee categories. Thus, the number of
certificates that EPA issues for the engines covered by this final rule
will be included in the respective fee categories when EPA conducts its
annual calculation for the purposes of adjusting fees based on the
existing regulatory formula. Please note that the fee amounts for
calendar year 2006 have slightly increased from the fee amounts for the
2004 and 2005 calendar year fees. See EPA's Guidance Letter CCD-05-05
at https://www.epa.gov/otaq/cert/dearmfr/dearmfr.htm. Finally, EPA
believes it appropriate to commence the collection of fees immediately
for each certification of conformity request once the final rule
becomes effective.
2. Owners and Operators
All engines and control devices must be installed, configured,
operated, and maintained according to the specifications and
instructions provided by the engine manufacturer. EPA has also included
the option for owners and operators to follow procedures developed by
the owner or operator that have been approved by the engine
manufacturer for cases where site-specific conditions may require
changes to the manufacturer's typical guidelines. Other compliance
requirements for owners and operators of stationary CI ICE depend on
the displacement and model year of the engine. Owners and operators of
pre-2007 model year engines with a displacement less than 30 liters per
cylinder and Tier 1 fire pump engines can demonstrate compliance by
purchasing an engine that is certified to meet the nonroad emission
standards for the model year and maximum engine power of the engine.
Other information such as performance test results for each pollutant
for a test conducted on a similar engine; data from the engine
manufacturer; data from the control device vendor; or conducting a
performance test can also be used to demonstrate compliance with the
emission standards. The records which indicate that the engine is
complying with the emission standards of the final rule must be kept on
file by the owner or operator of the engine and be available for
inspection by the enforcing agency. Engine manufacturers and/or control
device vendors may provide such information at the time of sale.
Manufacturers that provide such information to their customers may also
choose to place a label on the engine that indicates the engine meets
the applicable standards for stationary CI ICE under 40 CFR part 60,
subpart IIII, as long as the label does not violate or otherwise
interfere with other labels or requirements mandated by other
regulations. If the owner or operator chooses to conduct a performance
test to demonstrate compliance with the final rule, the test must be
conducted according to the in-use testing procedures of 40 CFR 1039,
subpart F.
Starting with 2007 model year engines with a displacement of less
than 30 liters per cylinder, owners and operators of engines that are
not fire pump engines are required to demonstrate compliance by
purchasing an engine certified to meet the applicable emission standard
for the model year and maximum engine power of the engine. Certified
fire pump engines will be available between 2008 and 2011, depending on
the size of the engine. For 2007 model year and later fire pump engines
that are not required to be certified, owners and operators can
demonstrate compliance using the procedures specified for pre-2007
model year engines. Beginning with the model years shown in table 3 to
the final rule, owners and operators of fire pump engines must purchase
certified engines.
If in-use testing is conducted, the owner and operator of engines
with a displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder would be
required to meet not-to-exceed (NTE) emission standards instead of the
standards in tables 1 and 2 of this preamble. Engines that are
complying with the emission standards in 40 CFR part 1039 (Tier 4
standards) must not exceed the NTE standards for the same model year
and maximum engine power as required in 40 CFR 1039.101(e) and 40 CFR
1039.102(g)(1), except as specified in 40 CFR 1039.104(d) starting when
NTE requirements take effect for nonroad diesel engines under 40 CFR
part 1039. Engines that are complying with the emission standards in 40
CFR 89.112 (Tier 2/3 standards), and engines that are pre-2007 model
year engines must meet the NTE standards in Equation 1 of this
preamble:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR11JY06.008
Where:
NTE = The NTE emission standard for each pollutant.
STD = The certification emission standard specified for each pollutant
in table 1 or 2 of this preamble for the same model year and maximum
engine power.
M = 1.25
Alternatively, stationary CI ICE that are complying with the
emission standards in 40 CFR 89.112 or that are pre-2007 model year
engines may use the testing procedures specified for engines with a
displacement of greater than or equal to 30 liters per cylinder,
described in the next paragraph, instead of the NTE provisions
discussed above.
Owners and operators of stationary CI ICE with a displacement of
greater than or equal to 30 liters per cylinder must conduct an initial
performance test to demonstrate compliance with the emissions
reductions requirements, establish operating parameters and monitor
operating parameters continuously. Non-emergency engines with a
displacement of greater than or equal to 30 liters per cylinder must
also conduct annual performance tests. The NTE standards do not apply
to engines that have a displacement of greater than or equal to 30
liters per cylinder. Testing conducted on these engines must be
performed to demonstrate that NOX and PM emission standards
are achieved, and the tests must be conducted within 10 percent of 100
percent peak (or the highest achievable) load.
G. What are the monitoring requirements?
Owners and operators of stationary CI ICE that are equipped with
catalyzed diesel particulate filters (CDPF) must install a backpressure
monitor that will notify the operator when the high backpressure limit
of the engine is approached. All emergency stationary CI ICE must have
a non-resettable hour meter to track the number of hours operated
during any type of operation.
H. What are the reporting and recordkeeping requirements?
The owner or operator of non-emergency stationary CI ICE that are
greater than 3,000 HP or with a displacement of greater than or equal
to 10 liters per cylinder, and non-emergency stationary CI ICE pre-2007
model year engines greater than 175 HP and not certified, must submit
an initial notification. The initial notification must contain
information identifying the owner or operator, the engine and control
device, and the fuel used. As mentioned, engines that are not certified
have various options for demonstrating initial compliance, which would
be documented in records available on-site. Also, all owners and
operators must keep records of all information necessary to demonstrate
compliance with the emission standards such as records of all
notifications submitted, any maintenance conducted on the engine, any
performance tests conducted on the engine (or performance tests
conducted on a similar engine that is used to
[[Page 39161]]
demonstrate compliance), engine manufacturer or control device vendor
information, etc. Owners and operators of certified engines must keep
records of documentation from the manufacturer that the engine is
certified to meet the emission standards. Owners and operators of
engines that are equipped with CDPF must install a backpressure monitor
and are required to maintain records of any corrective action taken
after the backpressure monitor has notified the owner or operator that
the backpressure limit is approached. These records must be available
for viewing upon request by the enforcing agency. Owners and operators
of emergency engines are not required to submit initial notifications.
However, these engines must have a non-resettable hour meter. Owners
and operators of emergency engines are required to keep records of
their hours of operation. Owners and operators must record the time of
operation of the engine and the reason the engine was in operation
during that time.
III. Summary of Significant Changes Since Proposal
Most of the rationale used to develop the proposed rule remains the
same for the final rule. Therefore, the rationale previously provided
in the rule, as proposed, is not repeated in the final rule, and the
rationale sections of the rule, as proposed, should be referred to.
Changes that have been made to the rule since proposal are discussed in
this section with rationale following in the Summary of Responses to
Major Comments section.
A. Applicability
The final rule includes an exemption for engines used at test
cells/stands.
The final rule also exempts area sources from title V permit
requirements.
B. Fuel Requirements
The proposed rule required the same fuel requirements for all
engines, except engines used in Guam, American Samoa, or the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The final rule does not
require owners and operators of stationary CI ICE with a displacement
of greater than or equal to 30 liters per cylinder subject to the rule
that use diesel fuel to meet the 15 ppm fuel sulfur requirements.
Owners and operators of these engines are subject to the 500 ppm fuel
requirements only, starting October 1, 2007.
In addition, EPA received comments on the proposal requesting that
EPA delay the sulfur requirements for diesel fuel intended for
stationary ICE in rural areas of Alaska until 2010, consistent with the
approach that was expected to be proposed for nonroad and highway
engines in rural Alaska. EPA believes it is appropriate to address
stationary, highway and nonroad fuel requirements in one rule where all
issues can be addressed and resolved. Therefore, on October 13, 2005
(70 FR 59690), EPA proposed to revise the provisions of 40 CFR part 69
(Special Exemptions from the CAA) to delay low sulfur fuel requirements
for rural areas of Alaska until December 1, 2010, except that certain
engines, including any 2011 model year and later stationary CI engines
operating in rural Alaska prior to December 1, 2010, would be required
to meet the 15 ppm sulfur requirement for diesel fuel. EPA has included
a special section in the final rule that specifies that until December
1, 2010, owners and operators of stationary CI engines located in
Alaska should refer to 40 CFR part 69 to determine the diesel fuel
requirements applicable to such engines.
In addition, the final regulations include language that allows
Alaska to submit for EPA approval through rulemaking process, by no
later than January 11, 2008, an alternative plan for implementing the
requirements of this regulation for public-sector electrical utilities
located in rural areas of Alaska not accessible by the Federal Aid
Highway System. The alternative plan must be based on the requirements
of section 111 of the CAA including any increased risks to human health
and the environment and must also be based on the unique circumstances
related to remote power generation, climatic conditions, and serious
economic impacts resulting from implementation of 40 CFR Part 60,
Subpart IIII.
EPA has included an option in the final rule for owners and
operators of pre-2011 model year engines located in remote areas of
Alaska to petition the Administrator to use any fuels mixed with used
oil that do not meet the fuel requirements in Sec. 60.4207 of the
final rule beyond the required fuel deadlines. The owner or operator
must show that there is no other place to burn the used oil. Each
petition, if approved, is valid for a period of up to 6 months.
EPA has clarified that the fuel requirements in Sec. 60.4207 of
the final rule only apply to stationary CI ICE that are subject to the
rule, and do not apply to new engines manufactured prior to April 1,
2006, unless they have been modified or reconstructed after July 15,
2005.
C. Maintenance and Testing
The proposed rule limited the use of emergency engines for the
purpose of maintenance and testing to 30 hours per year. This limit has
been increased in the final rule to 100 hours per year. EPA has also
included a provision that allows anyone to petition the Administrator
for additional hours, beyond the allowed 100 hours per year, if such
additional hours should prove to be necessary for maintenance and
testing reasons. EPA will not require a petition for additional hours
if the hours beyond 100 hours per year for maintenance and testing
purposes are mandated by regulation such as State or local
requirements.
D. Emission Standards
The emission standards for engines with a displacement of greater
than or equal to 30 liters per cylinder in the final rule are different
than in the rule, as proposed. EPA received comments that the proposed
PM standards and the proposed NOX g/KW-hr standard were not
achievable. EPA revised the standards for the final rule and believes
the final levels are achievable through the use of on-engine controls,
aftertreatment, and lower sulfur fuel.
E. Recordkeeping
For emergency engines, EPA proposed that owners and operators
record the use of the engine during non-emergency operation. These
hours would be recorded through the non-resettable hour meter. Based on
comments received on the rule, as proposed, EPA has determined that it
is appropriate to require records of all operation, including hours
operated during non-emergencies and hours operated during emergencies.
The owner must also record the time of operation of the engine and the
reason the engine was in operation during that time.
IV. Summary of Responses to Major Comments
A more detailed summary of comments and EPA's responses can be
found in the Summary of Public Comments document, which is available
from the rulemaking docket (see ADDRESSES section).
A. Applicability/Effective Date
Comment: One commenter expressed that the 6-month installation date
deadlines in Sec. 60.4208 of the proposed rule are problematic and
unworkable. The period of time between the manufacture of a stationary
CI engine and its installation is regularly in excess of 6 months. The
NSPS should incorporate the relevant anti-stockpiling
[[Page 39162]]
from the nonroad rule (40 CFR 89.1003(b)(4)) instead.
Another commenter said that Sec. 60.4208(a) of the proposed rule
does not exclude fire pumps (emergency CI ICE), but Sec. 60.4208(c)
through (f) of the proposed rule does. A 6-month time limitation will
become problematic, the commenter said. Due to construction project
complexities, size and delays, NFPA certified fire pump engines may not
be installed for as long as 1 year after the date of sale by the NFPA
certifier. The NFPA certified fire pump engines are typically not
purchased for inventory, and therefore, are self regulated by the date
of manufacturer. The commenter stated that fire pump engines should be
exempt from this fixed time restriction.
Response: EPA agrees with the commenters that the 6-month deadline
for installing engines of a previous tier is not long enough to allow
for the time that typically elapses between order and installation of
an engine and may prevent engine manufacturers from using up existing
inventories of engines. Therefore, EPA increased the time limit to 24
months after the beginning of the model year. EPA has also included
anti-stockpiling provisions similar to those used for nonroad engines
to prohibit stockpiling of previous tier engines in the final rule.
Also, EPA was concerned about imports of non-compliant stationary CI
engines and has made it clear in Sec. 60.4208 of the final rule that
the limitations of that section apply to imports of engines with a
displacement of less than 30 liters per cylinder also. Engines with a
displacement greater than or equal to 30 liters per cylinder are not
included in this provision since compliance with the emission standards
for those engines can only be demonstrated through on-site stack
testing. Finally, EPA has exempted stationary emergency fire pump
engines from the deadlines in Sec. 60.4208(a) and (b) of the final
rule to account for the fact that fire pumps have different timing
requirements for the emission standards they have to meet.
Comment: One commenter requested that the rule exempt area sources
from the requirement to have a title V permit solely because of the
presence of an affected engine.
Response: Section 502(a) of the CAA specifies the sources that are
required to obtain operating permits under title V. These sources
include (1) any affected source subject to the acid deposition
provisions of title IV of the CAA, (2) any major source, (3) any source
required to have a permit under parts C or D of title I of the CAA, (4)
``any other source (including an area source) subject to standards
under section 111 (new source performance standards) or 112 (national
emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants),'' and (5) any other
stationary source in a category designated by regulations promulgated
by the Administrator.
Section 502(a) of the CAA also provides that the Administrator may
``promulgate regulations to exempt one or more source categories (in
whole or in part) from the requirements of this subsection if the
Administrator finds that compliance with such requirements is
impracticable, infeasible, or unnecessarily burdensome on such
categories, except that the Administrator may not exempt any major
source from such requirements.'' EPA has exempted many area sources
subject to section 111 or 112 standards from title V requirements in
prior rulemakings, in particular see a recent final rule, 70 FR 75320,
December 19, 2005, that provides additional background information and
rationale for such exemptions for a large number of area sources
subject to CAA section 112 standards.
In the case of affected stationary CI engines located at area
sources, EPA believes compliance with permit requirements under title V
would be impracticable, infeasible and unnecessarily burdensome for the
reasons explained below.
First, title V permits would be unnecessarily burdensome for area
sources subject to this final rule because title V would not result in
significant improvements to compliance with the CAA section 111(b)
standard for the area sources. (The term ``title V permits'' used here
refers to permits issued under 40 CFR parts 70 or 71 by either a State
or local agency or EPA.) For a great number of these area sources,
these engines are the only emission source and the owner/operator
(often a hospital or a school) will not be at all familiar with the
requirements for permits. To demonstrate compliance with these section
111(b) standards, the final rule requires the owner or operator of the
area source to purchase a certified stationary CI engine. Certification
that the engine meets the emission reduction requirements of this final
rule is done by the manufacturer of the engine, rather than the area
source that owns or operates the engine. This strategy places a
significant amount of responsibility for compliance with the standard
on the manufacturer, compared to many other emission standards that
place the compliance responsibility on the owner or operator. EPA
believes this strategy is the most effective way to ensure that the
standard is met during the useful life of the engine. Also, title V
would not result in significa