Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Atlantic Ocean, Atlantic City, NJ, 38522-38523 [E6-10589]
Download as PDF
38522
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 130 / Friday, July 7, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
newspapers so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly.
(iii) When authorized to transit the
regulated area, all vessels shall proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course that minimizes
wake near the race course.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 6:30 a.m. to 12:30
p.m. on August 4, 2006, and from 10:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on August 6, 2006. If
either the speed trials or the races are
postponed due to weather, then the
temporary special local regulations will
be enforced during the same time period
the next day.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: June 16, 2006.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–10593 Filed 7–6–06; 8:45 am]
[CGD05–06–037]
On August 23, 2006, the Atlantic City
Chamber of Commerce will sponsor the
‘‘Thunder Over the Boardwalk
Airshow’’. The event will consist of
high performance jet aircraft performing
low altitude aerial maneuvers over the
waters of the Atlantic Ocean adjacent to
Atlantic City, New Jersey. A fleet of
spectator vessels is expected to gather
nearby to view the aerial demonstration.
Due to the need for vessel control
during the event, vessel traffic will be
temporarily restricted to provide for the
safety of spectators and transiting
vessels.
RIN 1625–AA08
Discussion of Comments and Changes
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Atlantic Ocean, Atlantic City,
NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing temporary special local
regulations for ‘‘Thunder Over the
Boardwalk Airshow’’, an aerial
demonstration to be held over the
waters of the Atlantic Ocean adjacent to
Atlantic City, New Jersey. These special
local regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event. This
proposed action would restrict vessel
traffic in portions of the Atlantic Ocean
adjacent to Atlantic City, New Jersey
during the aerial demonstration.
DATES: This rule is effective from 10:30
a.m. to 3 p.m. on August 23, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket (CGD05–06–
037) and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander (dpi), Fifth
Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford
Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704–
5004, between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Sens, Project Manager,
Inspections and Investigations Branch,
at (757) 398–6204.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Jul 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
Regulatory Information
On May 1, 2006, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Special Local Regulations for
Marine Events; Atlantic Ocean, Atlantic
City, NJ in the Federal Register (71 FR
25526). We received no letters
commenting on the proposed rule. No
public meeting was requested, and none
was held.
Small Entities
The Coast Guard did not receive
comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published
in the Federal Register. Accordingly,
the Coast Guard is establishing
temporary special local regulations on
specified waters of the Atlantic Ocean,
Atlantic City, New Jersey.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit this section
of the Atlantic Ocean adjacent to
Atlantic City, New Jersey during the
event.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. This rule will be in
effect for only a short period, from 10:30
a.m. to 3 p.m. on August 23, 2006.
Affected waterway users may pass
safely around the regulated area with
approval from the patrol commander.
Before the enforcement period, we will
issue maritime advisories so mariners
can adjust their plans accordingly.
Regulatory Evaluation
Assistance for Small Entities
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this temporary rule to be so minimal
that a full Regulatory Evaluation under
the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this regulation prevents
traffic from transiting a portion of the
Atlantic Ocean adjacent to Atlantic City,
New Jersey during the event, the effect
of this regulation will not be significant
due to the limited duration that the
regulated area will be in effect and the
extensive advance notifications that will
be made to the maritime community via
marine information broadcasts, local
commercial radio stations and area
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Background and Purpose
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
E:\FR\FM\07JYR1.SGM
07JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 130 / Friday, July 7, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
and direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Jul 06, 2006
Jkt 208001
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Special
local regulations issued in conjunction
with a marine event permit are
specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under those
sections. Under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction, an
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are not required for this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38523
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
I
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233, Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
I 2. Add a temporary section, § 100.35–
T05–037 to read as follows:
§ 100.35–T05–037
City, NJ.
Atlantic Ocean, Atlantic
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area
is established for the waters of the
Atlantic Ocean, adjacent to Atlantic
City, New Jersey, bounded by a line
drawn between the following points:
southeasterly from a point along the
shoreline at latitude 39°21′31″ N,
longitude 074°25′04″ W, thence to
latitude 39°21′08″ N, longitude
074°24′48″ W, thence southwesterly to
latitude 39°20′16″ N, longitude
074°27′17″ W, thence northwesterly to a
point along the shoreline at latitude
39°20′44″ N, longitude 074°27′31″ W,
thence northeasterly along the shoreline
to latitude 39°21′31″ N, longitude
074°25′04″ W. All coordinates reference
Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Delaware Bay.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay with
a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(c) Special local regulations. (1)
Except for participating vessels and
persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area must:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official
Patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 10:30 a.m. to 3
p.m. on August 23, 2006.
Dated: June 16, 2006.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–10589 Filed 7–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
E:\FR\FM\07JYR1.SGM
07JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 130 (Friday, July 7, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38522-38523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10589]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05-06-037]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Atlantic Ocean,
Atlantic City, NJ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing temporary special local
regulations for ``Thunder Over the Boardwalk Airshow'', an aerial
demonstration to be held over the waters of the Atlantic Ocean adjacent
to Atlantic City, New Jersey. These special local regulations are
necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during
the event. This proposed action would restrict vessel traffic in
portions of the Atlantic Ocean adjacent to Atlantic City, New Jersey
during the aerial demonstration.
DATES: This rule is effective from 10:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. on August 23,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket, are part of docket (CGD05-06-037) and are available for
inspection or copying at Commander (dpi), Fifth Coast Guard District,
431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704-5004, between 9 a.m.
and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Sens, Project Manager,
Inspections and Investigations Branch, at (757) 398-6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On May 1, 2006, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Atlantic Ocean,
Atlantic City, NJ in the Federal Register (71 FR 25526). We received no
letters commenting on the proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
On August 23, 2006, the Atlantic City Chamber of Commerce will
sponsor the ``Thunder Over the Boardwalk Airshow''. The event will
consist of high performance jet aircraft performing low altitude aerial
maneuvers over the waters of the Atlantic Ocean adjacent to Atlantic
City, New Jersey. A fleet of spectator vessels is expected to gather
nearby to view the aerial demonstration. Due to the need for vessel
control during the event, vessel traffic will be temporarily restricted
to provide for the safety of spectators and transiting vessels.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard did not receive comments in response to the notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register.
Accordingly, the Coast Guard is establishing temporary special local
regulations on specified waters of the Atlantic Ocean, Atlantic City,
New Jersey.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
It is not ``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures
of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this temporary rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this regulation prevents traffic from transiting a portion
of the Atlantic Ocean adjacent to Atlantic City, New Jersey during the
event, the effect of this regulation will not be significant due to the
limited duration that the regulated area will be in effect and the
extensive advance notifications that will be made to the maritime
community via marine information broadcasts, local commercial radio
stations and area newspapers so mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit this section of the Atlantic Ocean adjacent to Atlantic City,
New Jersey during the event.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule will be in effect for only a short period, from 10:30 a.m. to 3
p.m. on August 23, 2006. Affected waterway users may pass safely around
the regulated area with approval from the patrol commander. Before the
enforcement period, we will issue maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule would call for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
[[Page 38523]]
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial and direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government
and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Special local regulations issued in conjunction with a
marine event permit are specifically excluded from further analysis and
documentation under those sections. Under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction, an ``Environmental Analysis Check List''
and a ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are not required for this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233, Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add a temporary section, Sec. 100.35-T05-037 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35-T05-037 Atlantic Ocean, Atlantic City, NJ.
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area is established for the
waters of the Atlantic Ocean, adjacent to Atlantic City, New Jersey,
bounded by a line drawn between the following points: southeasterly
from a point along the shoreline at latitude 39[deg]21'31'' N,
longitude 074[deg]25'04'' W, thence to latitude 39[deg]21'08'' N,
longitude 074[deg]24'48'' W, thence southwesterly to latitude
39[deg]20'16'' N, longitude 074[deg]27'17'' W, thence northwesterly to
a point along the shoreline at latitude 39[deg]20'44'' N, longitude
074[deg]27'31'' W, thence northeasterly along the shoreline to latitude
39[deg]21'31'' N, longitude 074[deg]25'04'' W. All coordinates
reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay with a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(c) Special local regulations. (1) Except for participating vessels
and persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area must:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when directed to do so by any
Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official Patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 10:30
a.m. to 3 p.m. on August 23, 2006.
Dated: June 16, 2006.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6-10589 Filed 7-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P