Effect of the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act on the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income, 38401-38402 [06-6020]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 129 / Thursday, July 6, 2006 / Notices
550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20429.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
Effect of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Reform Act on the Consolidated
Reports of Condition and Income
Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency (OCC), Treasury; Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (Board); and Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Joint notice.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: On May 8, 2006, the agencies,
under the auspices of the Federal
Financial Institutions Examination
Council (FFIEC), published a joint
notice, with a request for comment,
announcing the effect of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Reform Act on the
reporting of certain deposit-related data
in the Consolidated Reports of
Condition and Income (Call Report;
FFIEC 031 and 041). The notice
described regulatory reporting revisions
being made to the Call Report effective
June 30, 2006, primarily in response to
an increase in the deposit insurance
coverage for certain retirement plan
deposits from $100,000 to $250,000.
After considering the comments
received on the agencies’ notice, the
agencies are providing additional
information concerning the
implementation of the regulatory
reporting changes related to retirement
plan deposits eligible for $250,000 in
insurance coverage.
DATES: The regulatory reporting
revisions related to certain retirement
plan deposits take effect June 30, 2006,
subject to transition guidance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OCC: Mary Gottlieb, OCC Clearance
Officer, or Camille Dickerson, (202)
874–5090, Legislative and Regulatory
Activities Division, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219.
Board: Michelle E. Long, Board
Clearance Officer, (202) 452–3829,
Division of Research and Statistics,
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th and C Streets,
NW., Washington, DC 20551.
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf
(TDD) users may call (202) 263–4869.
FDIC: Steven F. Hanft, (202) 898–
3907, Room MB–3064, Legal Division,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Jul 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
Banks file Call Report data with the
agencies each quarter for the agencies’
use in monitoring the condition,
performance, and risk profile of
reporting banks and the industry as a
whole. In addition, Call Report data
provide the most current statistical data
available for evaluating bank corporate
applications such as mergers, for
identifying areas of focus for both onsite and off-site examinations, and for
monetary and other public policy
purposes. Call Report data are also used
to calculate all banks’ deposit insurance
and Financing Corporation assessments
and national banks’ semiannual
assessment fees.
II. Current Actions
The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform
Act of 2005 (Reform Act) (Pub. L. 109–
171), enacted in February 2006,
increased the deposit insurance limit for
certain retirement plan deposit accounts
from $100,000 to $250,000. The basic
insurance limit for other depositor—
individuals, joint accountholders,
businesses, government entities, and
trusts—remains at $100,000. The FDIC
issued an interim rule to implement this
increase in coverage and other
provisions of the Reform Act pertaining
to deposit insurance coverage effective
April 1, 2006 (71 FR 14629).
Because the deposit insurance
coverage for certain retirement plan
deposits has increased while the
insurance limit for deposit accounts in
other ownership capacities has not
changed, the agencies announced on
May 8, 2006 (71 FR 26809), that data on
the number and amount of retirement
deposit accounts with balances within
and in excess of the new $250,000
insurance limit will begin to be reported
separately in the Call Report from data
on the number and amount of other
deposit accounts within and in excess of
the $100,000 insurance limit (Schedule
RC–O, Memorandum item 1). The
agencies also stated that the Call Report
instructions for reporting estimated
uninsured deposits by banks with $1
billion or more in total assets (Schedule
RC–O, Memorandum item 2) and for
reporting fully insured brokered
deposits (Schedule RC–E, Memorandum
item 1.c) will be revised to reflect the
new insurance limit for retirement
deposit accounts. The agencies’
announcement also advised that these
reporting revisions would take effect
June 30, 2006, the first report date
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38401
following the effective date of the
FDIC’s interim rule and that, for the
June 30 report date only, banks may
provide reasonable estimates for any
new or revised Call Report item for
which the requested information is not
readily available. After banks make any
necessary changes to their systems and
records, the agencies estimated that
these deposit-related reporting changes
would produce an average net increase
of 0.5 hours per bank per year in the
ongoing reporting burden of the Call
Report.
The agencies received comments on
their notice from America’s Community
Bankers (ACB), the Independent
Community Bankers of America (ICBA),
and the American Bankers Association
(ABA).
ACB supported the Call Report
revisions but expressed concern about
the short amount of time for banks to
implement the items. ACB urged the
agencies to waive any penalties for
reporting errors specific to the new or
revised items in the June 30, 2006, Call
Report. The agencies do not anticipate
imposing monetary penalties on banks
for such reporting errors in that Call
Report.
The ICBA commented that the
reporting revisions are not overly
burdensome and the ability to report
reasonable estimates in the June 30,
2006, Call Report is helpful. The ICBA
added, however, that once necessary
systems changes are made, the ongoing
reporting burden from the revised
reporting requirements would be 20 to
30 minutes per quarter rather than the
30 minutes per year that the agencies
had estimated. The agencies will revise
their estimate of the effect of the
deposit-related reporting changes to an
average net increase of 1.33 hours per
bank per year in the ongoing reporting
burden of the Call Report.
The ABA urged the agencies to delay
the reporting revisions until the FDIC
finalizes its interim rule on retirement
deposit account insurance and banks
have had time to make necessary
systems changes. The ABA noted that
the amount of time that banks have to
prepare for these reporting revisions is
shorter than usual and indicated that
bank deposit records and systems do not
clearly distinguish the types of
retirement deposit accounts eligible for
the higher insurance coverage from
other accounts. It also asserted that
there is uncertainty in the banking
industry as to which retirement deposit
accounts are eligible for the higher
insurance coverage. To address these
concerns, the agencies will implement
the following transitional approach to
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
38402
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 129 / Thursday, July 6, 2006 / Notices
the Call Report revisions related to
retirement deposit accounts.
First, because banks have long
reported the total amount of deposits
held in Individual Retirement Accounts
(IRAs) and Keogh Plan accounts in Call
Report Schedule RC–E, Memorandum
item 1.a, these two types of retirement
deposit accounts should already be
identified in banks’ deposit records and
systems. All deposits held in IRAs and
those deposits held in Keogh Plan
accounts that are ‘‘self-directed’’ are
eligible for the $250,000 insurance
coverage. For IRAs, banks may provide
reasonable estimates for the information
to be reported in the revised Schedule
RC–O and Schedule RC–E
Memorandum items in their June 30 and
September 30, 2006, Call Reports. For
Keogh Plan accounts, banks may
provide reasonable estimates of the
portion of these accounts eligible for the
$250,000 insurance coverage in the
revised Schedule RC–O and Schedule
RC–E Memorandum items in their June
30 and September 30, 2006, Call
Reports. If a bank’s existing deposit
records and systems for Keogh Plan
accounts provide insufficient
information to allow the bank to make
a reasonable estimate, the bank may
treat all deposits held in Keogh Plan
accounts as eligible for the $250,000
insurance coverage in these two Call
Reports (even though some of these
accounts may not be ‘‘self-directed’’
and, therefore, would not be eligible for
the increased coverage).
Second, banks should determine
whether they have other retirement
deposit accounts eligible for the
$250,000 insurance coverage (i.e.,
accounts other than IRAs and Keogh
Plan accounts). Banks may provide
reasonable estimates for the information
to be reported in the revised Schedule
RC–O and Schedule RC–E
Memorandum items in their June 30 and
September 30, 2006, Call Reports. If a
bank’s existing deposit records and
systems for these other retirement
deposit accounts provide insufficient
information to allow the bank to make
a reasonable estimate, the bank may
treat all of these deposit accounts as
eligible for the $100,000 insurance
coverage in these two Call Reports.
For the December 31, 2006, Call
Report, banks would be expected to
have made appropriate systems changes
to enable them to report reasonably
accurate data on all types of retirement
deposit accounts eligible for the
$250,000 insurance coverage. Therefore,
banks would no longer be permitted to
elect to treat all Keogh Plan accounts as
eligible for the $250,000 insurance
coverage and all other retirement
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Jul 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
deposit accounts as eligible for the
$100,000 insurance coverage in the
revised Schedule RC–O and Schedule
RC–E Memorandum items in their
December 31, 2006, Call Report.
Thereafter, banks’ deposit records and
systems should enable them to report
information on all retirement deposit
accounts in these Call Report items in
accordance with the applicable
instructions.
In addition, the agencies have
received inquiries concerning the
reporting of brokered certificates of
deposit issued in $1,000 amounts under
a master certificate of deposit in the
revised Schedule RC–O and Schedule
RC–E Memorandum items. For these socalled ‘‘retail brokered deposits,’’
multiple purchases by individual
depositors from an individual bank
normally do not exceed the applicable
deposit insurance limit (either $100,000
or $250,000), but under current deposit
insurance rules the deposit broker is not
required to provide information
routinely on these purchasers and their
account ownership capacity to the bank
issuing the deposits. For purposes of
reporting in the Call Report, these
brokered certificates of deposit in
$1,000 amounts are rebuttably
presumed to be fully insured brokered
deposits and should be reported in
Schedule RC–E, Memorandum item
1.c.(1), ‘‘Issued in denominations of less
than $100,000.’’ These deposits should
also be included in Schedule RC–E,
Memorandum item 2.b, ‘‘Total time
deposits of less than $100,000.’’ For
purposes of revised Schedule RCO,
Memorandum item 1, the instructions
state that multiple accounts of the same
depositor should not be aggregated.
Therefore, in the absence of information
on account ownership capacity for retail
brokered certificates of deposit in
$1,000 amounts, which are rebuttably
presumed to be fully insured brokered
deposits, banks issuing these brokered
deposits should include them in
Schedule RC–O, Memorandum item 1,
as ‘‘Deposit accounts of $100,000 or
less.’’
Dated: June 27, 2006.
James Gillespie,
Deputy Chief Counsel, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, June 29, 2006.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 27th day of
June, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–6020 Filed 7–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P; 6210–01–P; 6714–01–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
Establishment of a Transaction Fee for
Transportation Services Provided for
the GSA, Office of Global Supply
Federal Supply Service, GSA.
Notice in response to comments
on proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: GSA published a notice in the
Federal Register at 70 FR 73248 on
December 9, 2005, and an extension to
that notice at 70 FR 76455 on December
27, 2005, soliciting comments on the
establishment of a 4% transaction fee
for transportation services provided for
the GSA, Office of Global Supply.
Subsequent meetings were held with
transportation service provider
industries and the GSA, Office of Global
Supply. This notice is in response to the
comments GSA received.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Ms.
Mary Anne Sykes, Transportation
Programs Branch, by telephone at 703–
605–2889 or via email at
maryanne.sykes@gsa.gov.
The
proposed rule is applicable to the
Freight Management Program (FMP),
Standard Tender of Service (STOS), for
transportation services provided to the
Eastern Distribution Center (EDC),
Burlington, NJ; Western Distribution
Center (WDC), French Camp, CA; and
the National Industries for the Blind
(NIB) and National Industries for the
Severely Handicapped (NISH). It applies
to all transportation service providers
(TSPs) transporting these shipments.
Comments were received from the
following individual transportation
service providers, their representatives,
and various industry associations:
Associations
American Trucking Associations
National Motor Freight Traffic
Association
Transportation Intermediaries
Association
NYP, Inc.
Fiore Associates
Transportation Service Providers
Crossroad Carriers
Economy Transport, Inc.
Landstar System, Inc.
Tucker Company
General comments and issues raised
were centered on the following topics:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 129 (Thursday, July 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38401-38402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6020]
[[Page 38401]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Effect of the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act on the
Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income
AGENCIES: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Treasury;
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board); and Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Joint notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On May 8, 2006, the agencies, under the auspices of the
Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), published a
joint notice, with a request for comment, announcing the effect of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act on the reporting of certain
deposit-related data in the Consolidated Reports of Condition and
Income (Call Report; FFIEC 031 and 041). The notice described
regulatory reporting revisions being made to the Call Report effective
June 30, 2006, primarily in response to an increase in the deposit
insurance coverage for certain retirement plan deposits from $100,000
to $250,000. After considering the comments received on the agencies'
notice, the agencies are providing additional information concerning
the implementation of the regulatory reporting changes related to
retirement plan deposits eligible for $250,000 in insurance coverage.
DATES: The regulatory reporting revisions related to certain retirement
plan deposits take effect June 30, 2006, subject to transition
guidance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OCC: Mary Gottlieb, OCC Clearance Officer, or Camille Dickerson,
(202) 874-5090, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20219.
Board: Michelle E. Long, Board Clearance Officer, (202) 452-3829,
Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) users may call (202) 263-
4869.
FDIC: Steven F. Hanft, (202) 898-3907, Room MB-3064, Legal
Division, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20429.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Banks file Call Report data with the agencies each quarter for the
agencies' use in monitoring the condition, performance, and risk
profile of reporting banks and the industry as a whole. In addition,
Call Report data provide the most current statistical data available
for evaluating bank corporate applications such as mergers, for
identifying areas of focus for both on-site and off-site examinations,
and for monetary and other public policy purposes. Call Report data are
also used to calculate all banks' deposit insurance and Financing
Corporation assessments and national banks' semiannual assessment fees.
II. Current Actions
The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (Reform Act) (Pub.
L. 109-171), enacted in February 2006, increased the deposit insurance
limit for certain retirement plan deposit accounts from $100,000 to
$250,000. The basic insurance limit for other depositor--individuals,
joint accountholders, businesses, government entities, and trusts--
remains at $100,000. The FDIC issued an interim rule to implement this
increase in coverage and other provisions of the Reform Act pertaining
to deposit insurance coverage effective April 1, 2006 (71 FR 14629).
Because the deposit insurance coverage for certain retirement plan
deposits has increased while the insurance limit for deposit accounts
in other ownership capacities has not changed, the agencies announced
on May 8, 2006 (71 FR 26809), that data on the number and amount of
retirement deposit accounts with balances within and in excess of the
new $250,000 insurance limit will begin to be reported separately in
the Call Report from data on the number and amount of other deposit
accounts within and in excess of the $100,000 insurance limit (Schedule
RC-O, Memorandum item 1). The agencies also stated that the Call Report
instructions for reporting estimated uninsured deposits by banks with
$1 billion or more in total assets (Schedule RC-O, Memorandum item 2)
and for reporting fully insured brokered deposits (Schedule RC-E,
Memorandum item 1.c) will be revised to reflect the new insurance limit
for retirement deposit accounts. The agencies' announcement also
advised that these reporting revisions would take effect June 30, 2006,
the first report date following the effective date of the FDIC's
interim rule and that, for the June 30 report date only, banks may
provide reasonable estimates for any new or revised Call Report item
for which the requested information is not readily available. After
banks make any necessary changes to their systems and records, the
agencies estimated that these deposit-related reporting changes would
produce an average net increase of 0.5 hours per bank per year in the
ongoing reporting burden of the Call Report.
The agencies received comments on their notice from America's
Community Bankers (ACB), the Independent Community Bankers of America
(ICBA), and the American Bankers Association (ABA).
ACB supported the Call Report revisions but expressed concern about
the short amount of time for banks to implement the items. ACB urged
the agencies to waive any penalties for reporting errors specific to
the new or revised items in the June 30, 2006, Call Report. The
agencies do not anticipate imposing monetary penalties on banks for
such reporting errors in that Call Report.
The ICBA commented that the reporting revisions are not overly
burdensome and the ability to report reasonable estimates in the June
30, 2006, Call Report is helpful. The ICBA added, however, that once
necessary systems changes are made, the ongoing reporting burden from
the revised reporting requirements would be 20 to 30 minutes per
quarter rather than the 30 minutes per year that the agencies had
estimated. The agencies will revise their estimate of the effect of the
deposit-related reporting changes to an average net increase of 1.33
hours per bank per year in the ongoing reporting burden of the Call
Report.
The ABA urged the agencies to delay the reporting revisions until
the FDIC finalizes its interim rule on retirement deposit account
insurance and banks have had time to make necessary systems changes.
The ABA noted that the amount of time that banks have to prepare for
these reporting revisions is shorter than usual and indicated that bank
deposit records and systems do not clearly distinguish the types of
retirement deposit accounts eligible for the higher insurance coverage
from other accounts. It also asserted that there is uncertainty in the
banking industry as to which retirement deposit accounts are eligible
for the higher insurance coverage. To address these concerns, the
agencies will implement the following transitional approach to
[[Page 38402]]
the Call Report revisions related to retirement deposit accounts.
First, because banks have long reported the total amount of
deposits held in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and Keogh Plan
accounts in Call Report Schedule RC-E, Memorandum item 1.a, these two
types of retirement deposit accounts should already be identified in
banks' deposit records and systems. All deposits held in IRAs and those
deposits held in Keogh Plan accounts that are ``self-directed'' are
eligible for the $250,000 insurance coverage. For IRAs, banks may
provide reasonable estimates for the information to be reported in the
revised Schedule RC-O and Schedule RC-E Memorandum items in their June
30 and September 30, 2006, Call Reports. For Keogh Plan accounts, banks
may provide reasonable estimates of the portion of these accounts
eligible for the $250,000 insurance coverage in the revised Schedule
RC-O and Schedule RC-E Memorandum items in their June 30 and September
30, 2006, Call Reports. If a bank's existing deposit records and
systems for Keogh Plan accounts provide insufficient information to
allow the bank to make a reasonable estimate, the bank may treat all
deposits held in Keogh Plan accounts as eligible for the $250,000
insurance coverage in these two Call Reports (even though some of these
accounts may not be ``self-directed'' and, therefore, would not be
eligible for the increased coverage).
Second, banks should determine whether they have other retirement
deposit accounts eligible for the $250,000 insurance coverage (i.e.,
accounts other than IRAs and Keogh Plan accounts). Banks may provide
reasonable estimates for the information to be reported in the revised
Schedule RC-O and Schedule RC-E Memorandum items in their June 30 and
September 30, 2006, Call Reports. If a bank's existing deposit records
and systems for these other retirement deposit accounts provide
insufficient information to allow the bank to make a reasonable
estimate, the bank may treat all of these deposit accounts as eligible
for the $100,000 insurance coverage in these two Call Reports.
For the December 31, 2006, Call Report, banks would be expected to
have made appropriate systems changes to enable them to report
reasonably accurate data on all types of retirement deposit accounts
eligible for the $250,000 insurance coverage. Therefore, banks would no
longer be permitted to elect to treat all Keogh Plan accounts as
eligible for the $250,000 insurance coverage and all other retirement
deposit accounts as eligible for the $100,000 insurance coverage in the
revised Schedule RC-O and Schedule RC-E Memorandum items in their
December 31, 2006, Call Report. Thereafter, banks' deposit records and
systems should enable them to report information on all retirement
deposit accounts in these Call Report items in accordance with the
applicable instructions.
In addition, the agencies have received inquiries concerning the
reporting of brokered certificates of deposit issued in $1,000 amounts
under a master certificate of deposit in the revised Schedule RC-O and
Schedule RC-E Memorandum items. For these so-called ``retail brokered
deposits,'' multiple purchases by individual depositors from an
individual bank normally do not exceed the applicable deposit insurance
limit (either $100,000 or $250,000), but under current deposit
insurance rules the deposit broker is not required to provide
information routinely on these purchasers and their account ownership
capacity to the bank issuing the deposits. For purposes of reporting in
the Call Report, these brokered certificates of deposit in $1,000
amounts are rebuttably presumed to be fully insured brokered deposits
and should be reported in Schedule RC-E, Memorandum item 1.c.(1),
``Issued in denominations of less than $100,000.'' These deposits
should also be included in Schedule RC-E, Memorandum item 2.b, ``Total
time deposits of less than $100,000.'' For purposes of revised Schedule
RCO, Memorandum item 1, the instructions state that multiple accounts
of the same depositor should not be aggregated. Therefore, in the
absence of information on account ownership capacity for retail
brokered certificates of deposit in $1,000 amounts, which are
rebuttably presumed to be fully insured brokered deposits, banks
issuing these brokered deposits should include them in Schedule RC-O,
Memorandum item 1, as ``Deposit accounts of $100,000 or less.''
Dated: June 27, 2006.
James Gillespie,
Deputy Chief Counsel, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 29, 2006.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 27th day of June, 2006.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-6020 Filed 7-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P; 6210-01-P; 6714-01-P