Defense Science Board; Meetings, 38389-38390 [06-6009]

Download as PDF jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 129 / Thursday, July 6, 2006 / Notices the SBA’s definition of ‘‘small business concern’’ for the purpose of paying reduced patent fees as the definition of ‘‘small business concern’’ for Regulatory Flexibility Act purposes for patentrelated regulations. Comment Deadline Date: To be ensured of consideration, written comments must be received on or before August 7, 2006. No public hearing will be held. ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent by electronic mail message over the Internet addressed to rfapatents.comments@uspto.gov. Comments may also be submitted by mail addressed to: Mail Stop Comments—Patents, Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA, 22313–1450, or by facsimile to (571) 273–7735, marked to the attention of Christina T. Donnell. Although comments may be submitted by mail or facsimile, the Office prefers to receive comments via the Internet. Comments may also be sent by electronic mail message over the Internet via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. See the Federal eRulemaking Portal Web site (https:// www.regulations.gov) for additional instructions on providing comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. The comments will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Commissioner for Patents, located in Madison East, Tenth Floor, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia, and will be available via the Office Internet Web site (address: https://www.uspto.gov). Because comments will be made available for public inspection, information that is not desired to be made public, such as an address or phone number, should not be included in the comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina T. Donnell, Senior Petition Attorney, Office of Petitions, Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, by telephone at (571) 272–3211, by mail addressed to: Mail Stop Comments—Patents, Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA, 22313–1450, or by facsimile to (571) 273–7735, marked to the attention of Christina T. Donnell. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The patent statute provides that ‘‘fees charged under [35 U.S.C. 41](a), (b) and (d)(1) shall be reduced by 50 percent with respect to their application to any small business concern as defined under section 3 of the Small Business Act, and to any independent inventor or nonprofit organization as defined in regulations issued by the Director.’’ 35 U.S.C. 41(h)(1). The SBA defines a small VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:01 Jul 05, 2006 Jkt 208001 business concern for the purpose of paying reduced patent fees as one: ‘‘(a) Whose number of employees, including affiliates, does not exceed 500 persons; and (b) Which has not assigned, granted, conveyed, or licensed (and is under no obligation to do so) any rights in the invention to any person who made it and could not be classified as an independent inventor, or to any concern which would not qualify as a non-profit organization or a small business concern under this section.’’ 13 CFR 121.802. The USPTO uses the SBA size standard for the purpose of paying reduced patent fees in 13 CFR 121.802 as the size standard when conducting an analysis or making a certification under the Regulatory Flexibility Act for patentrelated regulations. See e.g., Changes To Support Implementation of the United States Patent and Trademark Office 21st Century Strategic Plan, 69 FR 56481, 56530 (Sept 21, 2004) (discussion indicating that small entities for purposes of Regulatory Flexibility Act are considered a subset of the small entities for purposes of paying reduced patent fees). The SBA-Advocacy, however, has questioned whether the USPTO’s size standard is underinclusive because it excludes ‘‘any business concern that has assigned, granted, conveyed, or licensed (and is under no obligation to do so) any rights in the invention to any person who made it and could not be classified as an independent inventor, or to any concern which would not qualify as a non-profit organization or a small business concern under [13 CFR 121.802].’’ 13 CFR 121.802(b). The size standard set forth in 13 CFR 121.802 is the size standard ‘‘for the purpose of paying reduced patent fees’’ and thus appears to be limited to payment of patent fees. See 13 CFR 121.801. The SBA small business size standards are set forth in 13 CFR 121.201. The USPTO uses the SBA size standard for the purpose of paying reduced patent fees as its size standard when conducting an analysis or making a certification under the Regulatory Flexibility Act because the USPTO has no business need (other than to conduct an analysis or make a certification under the Regulatory Flexibility Act) to collect information from patentees and patent applicants concerning whether they are a small business concern using the size standards set forth in 13 CFR 121.201, and thus, the USPTO does not collect this information. The USPTO is proposing to use the size standard set forth in 13 CFR 121.802 as its size standard when conducting an analysis or making a certification under the Regulatory Flexibility Act to avoid the PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38389 need to collect information from patentees and patent applicants concerning whether they are a small business concern using the size standards set forth in 13 CFR 121.201. The Regulatory Flexibility Act permits an agency head to establish, for purposes of Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis and certification, one or more definitions of ‘‘small business concern’’ that are appropriate to the activities of the agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and after opportunity for public comment. See 5 U.S.C. 601(3) and 13 CFR 121.903(c). Therefore, the USPTO is publishing for comment a definition of small business concern for purposes of the USPTO conducting an analysis or making a certification under the Regulatory Flexibility Act for patent-related regulations. Specifically, the USPTO’s definition of small business concern for Regulatory Flexibility Act purposes is a business or other concern that: (1) Meets the SBA’s definition of a ‘‘business concern or concern’’ set forth in 13 CFR 121.105; and (2) meets the size standards set forth in 13 CFR 121.802 for the purpose of paying reduced patent fees, namely an entity: (a) Whose number of employees, including affiliates, does not exceed 500 persons; and (b) which has not assigned, granted, conveyed, or licensed (and is under no obligation to do so) any rights in the invention to any person who made it and could not be classified as an independent inventor, or to any concern which would not qualify as a non-profit organization or a small business concern under this definition. Dated: June 28, 2006. Jon W. Dudas, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [FR Doc. E6–10564 Filed 7–5–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–16–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary Defense Science Board; Meetings Department of Defense. Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Technology Vectors will meet in closed session on July 11 and 12, 2006: at Strategic Analysis, Inc. (SAI), 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 500, Arlington, VA. This meeting will continue to map the study’s direction E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM 06JYN1 38390 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 129 / Thursday, July 6, 2006 / Notices and begin discussion on what will be the Technology Vectors DoD will need for the 21st century. The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: review previous attempts by DoD to identify critical technologies in order to derive lessons that would help illuminate the current challenge; identify the National Security objectives for the 21st century and the operational missions that U.S. military will be called upoon to support these objectives; identify new operational capabilities needed for the proposed missions; identify the critical science technology, and other related enablers of the desired capabilities; assess current S&T investment plans’ relevance to the needed operational capabilities and enablers and recommend needed changes to the plans; identify mechanisms to accelerate and assure the transition of technology into U.S. military capabilities; and review and recommend changes as needed, the current processes by which national security objectives and needed operational capabilities are used to develop and prioritize science, technology, and other related enablers, and how those enablers are then developed. In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. No. 92–463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the meetings will be closed to the public. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LCDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301– 3140, via e-mail at clifton.phillips@osd.mil, or via phone at (703) 571–0083. Due to scheduling and work burden difficulties, there is insufficient time to provide timely notice required by section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and § 102–3.150(b) of the GSA Final Rule on Federal Advisory Committee Management, 41 CFR 102– 3.150(b), which further requires VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:01 Jul 05, 2006 Jkt 208001 publication at least 15 calendar days prior to the meeting. C.R. Choate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 06–6009 Filed 7–5–06; 8:45am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–M DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary Defense Science Board; Meetings AGENCY: Department of Defense. Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings. ACTION: SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on VTOL/STOL will meet in closed session on July 20–21, 2006; at Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA. This meeting continues the task force’s work and will consist of a FOUO briefing and the remaining is executive session on current technologies and programs. The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: assess the features and capabilities VTOL/STOL aircraft should have in order to support the nation’s defense needs through at least the first half of the 21st century. In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92–463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the meetings will be closed to the public. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LCDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301– 3140, via e-mail at clifton.phillips@osd.mil, or via phone at (703) 571–0083. C.R. Choate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 06–6010 Filed 7–5–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–M PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Agency Information Collection Extension Department of Energy. Submission for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review; comment request. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) has submitted an information collection package to the OMB for extension under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The package requests a three-year extension of the information collection listed at the end of this notice. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the extended information collections are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information has practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the information collections, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the information collections on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Comments regarding this collection must be received on or before August 7, 2006. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, please advise the OMB Desk Officer of your intention to make a submission as soon as possible. The Desk Officer may be telephoned at 202–395–4650. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Jeffrey Martus, IM–11/ Germantown Building, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave, SW., Washington, DC 20585–1290; or by fax at 301–903–9061 or by e-mail at Jeffrey.martus@hq.doe.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should be directed to Jeffrey Martus at the address listed above in ADDRESSES. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information collection package listed in this notice for public comment include the following: (1) OMB No.: 1910–1000. (2) Package Title: Personal Property. (3) Type of Review: Renewal. (4) Purpose: This information collection provides the Department with the information necessary for the management, control, reutilization, and E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM 06JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 129 (Thursday, July 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38389-38390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6009]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board; Meetings

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Technology Vectors 
will meet in closed session on July 11 and 12, 2006: at Strategic 
Analysis, Inc. (SAI), 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 500, Arlington, VA. 
This meeting will continue to map the study's direction

[[Page 38390]]

and begin discussion on what will be the Technology Vectors DoD will 
need for the 21st century.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: review previous 
attempts by DoD to identify critical technologies in order to derive 
lessons that would help illuminate the current challenge; identify the 
National Security objectives for the 21st century and the operational 
missions that U.S. military will be called upoon to support these 
objectives; identify new operational capabilities needed for the 
proposed missions; identify the critical science technology, and other 
related enablers of the desired capabilities; assess current S&T 
investment plans' relevance to the needed operational capabilities and 
enablers and recommend needed changes to the plans; identify mechanisms 
to accelerate and assure the transition of technology into U.S. 
military capabilities; and review and recommend changes as needed, the 
current processes by which national security objectives and needed 
operational capabilities are used to develop and prioritize science, 
technology, and other related enablers, and how those enablers are then 
developed.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the 
meetings will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LCDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense 
Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-
3140, via e-mail at clifton.phillips@osd.mil, or via phone at (703) 
571-0083.
    Due to scheduling and work burden difficulties, there is 
insufficient time to provide timely notice required by section 10(a) of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act and Sec.  102-3.150(b) of the GSA 
Final Rule on Federal Advisory Committee Management, 41 CFR 102-
3.150(b), which further requires publication at least 15 calendar days 
prior to the meeting.

C.R. Choate,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-6009 Filed 7-5-06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.