Safety Zone; Lignelli Wedding Fireworks, Atlantic Ocean, Water Mill, NY, 38089-38091 [E6-10472]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD01–06–067]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Lignelli Wedding
Fireworks, Atlantic Ocean, Water Mill,
NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
the Lignelli Wedding Fireworks in the
Atlantic Ocean off of 381 Dune Road,
Water Mill, NY. The safety zone is
necessary to protect the life and
property of the maritime community
from the hazards posed by the fireworks
display. Entry into or movement within
this safety zone during the enforcement
period is prohibited without approval of
the Captain of the Port, Long Island
Sound.
This rule is effective from 8 p.m.
to 10:10 p.m. on July 8, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket CGD01–06–
067 and will be available for inspection
or copying at Sector Long Island Sound,
New Haven, CT, between 9 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Junior Grade D. Miller,
Assistant Chief, Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard
Sector Long Island Sound at (203) 468–
4596.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The Coast
Guard did not receive an Application
for Approval of Marine Event for this
event until April 8, 2006, thereby
making an NPRM impracticable and
contrary to the pubic interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Any delay encountered in this
regulation’s effective date would be
impracticable and contrary to public
interest since immediate action is
needed to prevent traffic from transiting
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:23 Jul 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
a portion of the Atlantic Ocean off of
Water Mill, NY and to protect the
maritime public from the hazards
associated with this fireworks event.
The temporary zone should have
minimal negative impact on the public
and navigation because it is only
effective for a 2 hour and 10 minute
period and the area closed by the safety
zone is minimal, allowing vessels to
transit around the zone in the Atlantic
Ocean off of Water Mill, NY.
Background and Purpose
The Lignelli Wedding Fireworks
display will be taking place in the
Atlantic Ocean off of Water Mill, NY
from 8 p.m. to 10:10 p.m. on July 8,
2006. This safety zone is necessary to
protect the life and property of the
maritime public from the hazards posed
by the fireworks display. It will protect
the maritime public by prohibiting entry
into or movement within this portion of
the Atlantic Ocean one hour prior to,
during and one hour after the stated
event.
Discussion of Rule
This regulation establishes a
temporary safety zone on the waters of
the Atlantic Ocean, off of 381 Dune
Road, Water Mill, NY within a 1200-foot
radius of the fireworks barge located at
approximate position 40°53′27.99″ N,
072°19′14.10″ W. The temporary safety
zone will be outlined by temporary
marker buoys installed by the event
organizers.
This action is intended to prohibit
vessel traffic in a portion of the Atlantic
Ocean off of Water Mill, NY to provide
for the protection of life and property of
the maritime public. The safety zone
will be enforced from 8 p.m. until 10:10
p.m. on July 8, 2006. Marine traffic may
transit safely outside of the safety zone
during the event thereby allowing
navigation of the rest of the Atlantic
Ocean except for the portion delineated
by this rule.
The Captain of the Port anticipates
minimal negative impact on vessel
traffic due to this event due to the
limited area and duration covered by
this safety zone. Public notifications
will be made prior to the effective
period via local notice to mariners and
marine information broadcasts.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38089
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule will be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. This regulation
may have some impact on the public,
but the potential impact will be
minimized for the following reasons:
Vessels will only be excluded from the
area of the safety zone for 2 hours and
ten (10) minutes; and vessels will be
able to operate in other areas of the
Atlantic Ocean off of Water Mill, NY
during the enforcement period.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
those portions of Long Island Sound
covered by the safety zone. For the
reasons outlined in the Regulatory
Evaluation section above, this rule will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under subsection 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 [Pub. L. 104–121],
the Coast Guard wants to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so
that they can better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking. If this rule will affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call
Lieutenant Junior Grade D. Miller,
Assistant Chief, Waterways
E:\FR\FM\05JYR1.SGM
05JYR1
38090
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Management Division, Sector Long
Island Sound, at (203) 468–4596.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:23 Jul 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
will not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it will not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. It has not been designated by the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it
does not require a Statement of Energy
Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of the categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1225, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T01–067 to
read as follows:
I
§ 165.T01–067 Safety Zone: Lignelli
Wedding Fireworks, Atlantic Ocean, Water
Mill, NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the Atlantic
Ocean in a 1200-foot radius of a
fireworks barge site located off of 381
Dune Road, Water Mill, NY at
approximate position 40°53′27.99″ N,
072°19′14.10″ W. All coordinates are
North American Datum 1983.
(b) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8 p.m. to 10:10
p.m. on Saturday, July 8, 2006.
(c) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained
in 33 CFR 165.23 apply.
(2) In accordance with the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
into or movement within this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Long Island Sound.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the Coast Guard Captain of
the Port or designated on-scene patrol
personnel. These personnel comprise
commissioned, warrant and petty
officers of the U.S. Coast Guard. Upon
being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or
other means, the operator of the vessel
shall proceed as directed.
E:\FR\FM\05JYR1.SGM
05JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: June 22, 2006.
J.J. Plunkett,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port, Long Island Sound, Acting.
[FR Doc. E6–10472 Filed 7–3–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1, 22, 24, and 64
[ET Docket No. 04–295; RM–10865; FCC 06–
56]
Communications Assistance for Law
Enforcement Act and Broadband
Access and Services
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document addresses the
assistance capabilities required,
pursuant to section 103 of the
Communications Assistance for Law
Enforcement Act (CALEA) for facilitiesbased broadband Internet access
providers and providers of
interconnected Voice over Internet
Protocol (VoIP). More generally, the
Second Report and Order and
Memorandum Opinion and Order
(Second R&O and MO&O) specifies
mechanisms to ensure that
telecommunications carriers comply
with CALEA. The MO&O denies in part
and grants in part a petition for
reconsideration and clarification filed
by the United States Telecom
Association (USTelecom) relating to the
compliance date for broadband Internet
access providers and providers of
interconnected VoIP.
DATES: Effective August 4, 2006, except
for §§ 1.20004 and 1.20005, which
contain information collection
requirements that have not been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget. The Federal
Communications Commission will
publish a document in the Federal
Register announcing the effective date
of these sections.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rodney Small, Office of Engineering
and Technology, (202) 418–2452, email: Rodney.Small@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Second
Report and Order and Memorandum
Opinion and Order, ET Docket No. 04–
295, FCC 06–56, adopted May 3, 2006,
and released May 12, 2006. The full text
of this document is available for
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC Reference
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:23 Jul 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
Center (Room CY–A257), 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. The
full text of this document also may be
purchased from the Commission’s copy
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.,
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room
CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554,
telephone (202) 488–5300; fax (202)
488–5563; e-mail at
FCC@BCPIWEB.COM.
Summary of the Second Report and
Order and Memorandum Opinion and
Order
Overview
1. Telecommunications industry
standard-setting bodies, working in
concert with law enforcement agencies
(LEAs) and other interested parties, are
developing technical requirements and
solutions for facilities-based broadband
Internet access providers and providers
of interconnected VoIP. We conclude
that, absent the filing of a deficiency
petition under CALEA section 107(b), it
would be premature for the FCC to
intervene in the standards development
process. Additionally, we permit all
carriers providing facilities-based
broadband Internet access and
interconnected VoIP services until May
14, 2007 to come into compliance with
CALEA. Further, we require that all
carriers providing facilities-based
broadband Internet access and
interconnected VoIP service to submit
interim reports to the Commission to
ensure that they will be CALEAcompliant by May 14, 2007. We also
require that all facilities-based
broadband Internet access and
interconnected VoIP providers to whom
CALEA obligations were extended in
the First Report and Order (First R&O)
in this proceeding come into
compliance with the system security
requirements in our rules within 90
days of the effective date of this Second
R&O.
2. More generally, we specify
mechanisms to ensure that
telecommunications carriers comply
with CALEA. Specifically, under the
express terms of the statute, all carriers
subject to CALEA are obliged to become
CALEA-compliant. We find that
sections 107(c) and 109(b) of CALEA
provide only limited and temporary
relief from compliance requirements,
and that they are complementary
provisions that serve different purposes,
which are, respectively: (1) Extension of
the CALEA section 103 compliance
deadline for equipment, facility, or
service deployed before October 25,
1998; and (2) recovery of CALEAimposed costs. We also conclude that,
in addition to the enforcement remedies
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38091
through the courts available to LEAs
under CALEA section 108, we may take
separate enforcement action against
carriers that fail to comply with CALEA.
Moreover, we conclude that carriers are
generally responsible for CALEA
development and implementation costs
for post-January 1, 1995 equipment and
facilities.
Background
3. In March 2004, the Department of
Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI), and the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA)
(collectively, Law Enforcement) filed
with the Commission a petition for
expedited rulemaking, requesting that
we initiate a proceeding to resolve
various outstanding issues associated
with the implementation of CALEA. We
responded in August 2004 by issuing a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
(69 FR 56976, September 23, 2004) and
Declaratory Ruling in this proceeding.
The NPRM examined issues relating to
the scope of CALEA’s applicability to
packet-mode services, such as
broadband Internet access, and
implementation and enforcement issues.
4. In September 2005, the First R&O
(70 FR 59664, October 13, 2005)
concluded that CALEA applies to
facilities-based broadband Internet
access providers and providers of
interconnected VoIP service, and the
concurrent Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (70 FR 59704, October 13,
2005) sought comment on whether
CALEA obligations should be extended
to providers of other types of VoIP
services and on whether something less
than full CALEA compliance should be
required of certain classes or categories
of facilities-based broadband Internet
access providers. The First R&O stated:
‘‘In the coming months, we will release
another order that will address separate
questions regarding the assistance
capabilities required of the providers
covered by today’s Order pursuant to
section 103 of CALEA. This subsequent
order will include other important
issues under CALEA, such as
compliance extensions and exemptions,
cost recovery, identification of future
services and entities subject to CALEA,
and enforcement.’’ The Second R&O
addresses these questions and issues
and specifies what telecommunications
providers must do to facilitate electronic
surveillance of their equipment,
facilities, and services by LEAs,
pursuant to court orders or other lawful
authorization.
5. In this Second R&O, we first
examine the obligations of facilitiesbased broadband Internet access and
interconnected VoIP providers to
E:\FR\FM\05JYR1.SGM
05JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 5, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38089-38091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10472]
[[Page 38089]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD01-06-067]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Lignelli Wedding Fireworks, Atlantic Ocean, Water
Mill, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
the Lignelli Wedding Fireworks in the Atlantic Ocean off of 381 Dune
Road, Water Mill, NY. The safety zone is necessary to protect the life
and property of the maritime community from the hazards posed by the
fireworks display. Entry into or movement within this safety zone
during the enforcement period is prohibited without approval of the
Captain of the Port, Long Island Sound.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 p.m. to 10:10 p.m. on July 8,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket, are part of docket CGD01-06-067 and will be available for
inspection or copying at Sector Long Island Sound, New Haven, CT,
between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Junior Grade D. Miller,
Assistant Chief, Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard Sector Long
Island Sound at (203) 468-4596.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The Coast Guard did not
receive an Application for Approval of Marine Event for this event
until April 8, 2006, thereby making an NPRM impracticable and contrary
to the pubic interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Any delay encountered in this
regulation's effective date would be impracticable and contrary to
public interest since immediate action is needed to prevent traffic
from transiting a portion of the Atlantic Ocean off of Water Mill, NY
and to protect the maritime public from the hazards associated with
this fireworks event.
The temporary zone should have minimal negative impact on the
public and navigation because it is only effective for a 2 hour and 10
minute period and the area closed by the safety zone is minimal,
allowing vessels to transit around the zone in the Atlantic Ocean off
of Water Mill, NY.
Background and Purpose
The Lignelli Wedding Fireworks display will be taking place in the
Atlantic Ocean off of Water Mill, NY from 8 p.m. to 10:10 p.m. on July
8, 2006. This safety zone is necessary to protect the life and property
of the maritime public from the hazards posed by the fireworks display.
It will protect the maritime public by prohibiting entry into or
movement within this portion of the Atlantic Ocean one hour prior to,
during and one hour after the stated event.
Discussion of Rule
This regulation establishes a temporary safety zone on the waters
of the Atlantic Ocean, off of 381 Dune Road, Water Mill, NY within a
1200-foot radius of the fireworks barge located at approximate position
40[deg]53'27.99'' N, 072[deg]19'14.10'' W. The temporary safety zone
will be outlined by temporary marker buoys installed by the event
organizers.
This action is intended to prohibit vessel traffic in a portion of
the Atlantic Ocean off of Water Mill, NY to provide for the protection
of life and property of the maritime public. The safety zone will be
enforced from 8 p.m. until 10:10 p.m. on July 8, 2006. Marine traffic
may transit safely outside of the safety zone during the event thereby
allowing navigation of the rest of the Atlantic Ocean except for the
portion delineated by this rule.
The Captain of the Port anticipates minimal negative impact on
vessel traffic due to this event due to the limited area and duration
covered by this safety zone. Public notifications will be made prior to
the effective period via local notice to mariners and marine
information broadcasts.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule will be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and
procedures of DHS is unnecessary. This regulation may have some impact
on the public, but the potential impact will be minimized for the
following reasons: Vessels will only be excluded from the area of the
safety zone for 2 hours and ten (10) minutes; and vessels will be able
to operate in other areas of the Atlantic Ocean off of Water Mill, NY
during the enforcement period.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in those portions of Long Island Sound covered by the safety
zone. For the reasons outlined in the Regulatory Evaluation section
above, this rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under subsection 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 [Pub. L. 104-121], the Coast Guard
wants to assist small entities in understanding this rule so that they
can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the
rulemaking. If this rule will affect your small business, organization,
or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please call Lieutenant Junior
Grade D. Miller, Assistant Chief, Waterways
[[Page 38090]]
Management Division, Sector Long Island Sound, at (203) 468-4596.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and will not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of the
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1225, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T01-067 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-067 Safety Zone: Lignelli Wedding Fireworks, Atlantic
Ocean, Water Mill, NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Atlantic Ocean in a 1200-foot radius of a fireworks barge site
located off of 381 Dune Road, Water Mill, NY at approximate position
40[deg]53'27.99'' N, 072[deg]19'14.10'' W. All coordinates are North
American Datum 1983.
(b) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8 p.m.
to 10:10 p.m. on Saturday, July 8, 2006.
(c) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23 apply.
(2) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 165.23 of
this part, entry into or movement within this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Long Island Sound.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or designated on-scene patrol personnel. These
personnel comprise commissioned, warrant and petty officers of the U.S.
Coast Guard. Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren,
radio, flashing light or other means, the operator of the vessel shall
proceed as directed.
[[Page 38091]]
Dated: June 22, 2006.
J.J. Plunkett,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Long Island Sound,
Acting.
[FR Doc. E6-10472 Filed 7-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P