Subordinated Debt Securities and Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock, 37862-37868 [E6-10341]
Download as PDF
37862
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7231–7237 and 7931 et
seq.; 15 U.S.C. 714b and 714c.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Subpart A—General
10 CFR Parts 20 and 32
2. Revise § 1421.13 to read as follows:
§ 1421.13 Special marketing assistance
loans and loan deficiency payments.
(a) Commodities stored in an
unapproved storage facility may be
pledged as collateral for a marketing
assistance loan if the producer:
(1) Makes request of the marketing
assistance loan and obtains the
commodity certificate to immediately
exchange for the requested loan
collateral at the same time at the county
office that, under part 718 of this title,
is responsible for administering the
programs for the farm on which the
commodity was produced.
(2) Submits the marketing assistance
loan request and the commodity
certificate exchange before or on the
date of delivery to the unapproved
facility.
(b) Eligible producers of hay and
silage derived from an eligible loan
commodity as provided in § 1421.5 are
eligible to request hay and silage
quantities for a loan deficiency payment
in accordance with § 1421.200.
Subpart B—Marketing Assistance
Loans
3. Revise § 1421.103(c) to read as
follows:
§ 1421.103
Approved storage.
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) Approved warehouse storage
consists of warehouses that are:
(i) If Federally-licensed, in
compliance with 7 CFR part 735; or
(ii) If not Federally-licensed, in
compliance with State laws and is a
warehouse that issues a warehouse
receipt that meets the criteria set forth
in § 1421.107.
(2) CCC may, on a case-by-case basis,
require a warehouse operator that is not
Federally-or State-licensed to enter into
an agreement with CCC that sets forth
requirements to adequately protect
CCC’s security interest in commodities
pledged as collateral for a loan in
accordance with this part.
4. Remove §§ 1421.5551 through
1421.5559.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_1
*
Signed in Washington, DC, on June 16,
2006.
Thomas B. Hofeller,
Acting Executive Vice President, Commodity
Credit Corporation.
[FR Doc. E6–10368 Filed 6–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
RIN 3150–AH48
National Source Tracking of Sealed
Sources: Extension of Comment
Period
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule: Extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On June 13, 2006, the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC)
published for public comment a
proposal to change the basis for the
national source tracking rule from the
NRC’s authority to promote the common
defense and security to protection of the
public health and safety. The comment
period for this proposed rule was to
have expired on July 3, 2006. Senator
Hillary Rodham Clinton and
Representative Edward Markey
requested an extension to the comment
period. The NRC has decided to extend
the comment period for an additional 25
days.
DATES: The comment period for the
proposed rule published on June 13,
2006 (71 FR 34024), has been extended
and now expires on July 28, 2006.
Comments received after this date will
be considered if it is practical to do so,
but the Commission is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
received before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any one of the following methods.
Please include the following number
(RIN 3150–AH48) in the subject line of
your comments. Comments on
rulemakings submitted in writing or in
electronic form will be made available
to the public in their entirety on the
NRC rulemaking Web site. Personal
information will not be removed from
your comments.
Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, ATTN:
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.
E-mail comments to: SECY@nrc.gov. If
you do not receive a reply e-mail
confirming that we have received your
comments, contact us directly at (301)
415–1966. You may also submit
comments via the NRC’s rulemaking
Web site at https://ruleforum.llnl.gov.
Address questions about our rulemaking
website to Carol Gallagher (301) 415–
5905; e-mail cag@nrc.gov. Comments
can also be submitted via the Federal
Rulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Hand deliver comments to: 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m.
Federal workdays. (Telephone (301)
415–1966).
Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission at (301)
415–1101.
Publicly available documents related
to this rulemaking may be examined
and copied for a fee at the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR), Public File Area
O1 F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
Selected documents, including
comments, can be viewed and
downloaded electronically via the NRC
rulemaking Web site at https://
ruleforum.llnl.gov.
Publicly available documents created
or received at the NRC after November
1, 1999, are available electronically at
the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at
https://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/
index.html. From this site, the public
can gain entry into the NRC’s
Agencywide Document Access and
Management System (ADAMS), which
provides text and image files of NRC’s
public documents. If you do not have
access to ADAMS or if there are
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, contact the NRC
Public Document Room (PDR) Reference
staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737
or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Merri Horn, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone (301) 415–
8126, e-mail, mlh1@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day
of June, 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette Vietti Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–10422 Filed 6–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision
12 CFR Part 563
[No. 2006–24]
RIN 1550–AC06
Subordinated Debt Securities and
Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred
Stock
Office of Thrift Supervision,
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
SUMMARY: A savings association must
obtain OTS approval (or non-objection)
before it may include subordinated debt
securities or mandatorily redeemable
preferred stock in supplementary (tier 2)
capital. OTS rules at 12 CFR 563.81 set
forth application and notice procedures,
requirements that securities must meet
in order to be included in
supplementary capital, and conditions
for OTS approval (or non-objection),
and also address other matters.
OTS is proposing to update this rule.
The proposed rule would delete several
unnecessary or outdated requirements
and would conform certain provisions,
such as maturity period requirements
and purchaser restrictions, to the rules
issued by the other federal banking
agencies. In addition, the proposed rule
would reconcile conflicting rules, add
appropriate statutory cross-references,
and rewrite the rule in plain language.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by No. 2006–24, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail address:
regs.comments@ots.treas.gov. Please
include No. 2006–24 in the subject line
of the message and include your name
and telephone number in the message.
• Fax: (202) 906–6518.
• Mail: Regulation Comments, Chief
Counsel’s Office, Office of Thrift
Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20552, Attention: No.
2006–24.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Guard’s
Desk, East Lobby Entrance, 1700 G
Street, NW., from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. on
business days, Attention: Regulation
Comments, Chief Counsel’s Office,
Attention: No. 2006–24.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted
without change to the OTS Internet Site
at https://www.ots.treas.gov/
pagehtml.cfm?catNumber=67&an=1,
including any personal information
provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.ots.treas.gov/
pagehtml.cfm?catNumber=67&an=1. In
addition, you may inspect comments at
the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street,
NW., by appointment. To make an
appointment for access, call (202) 906–
5922, send an e-mail to
public.info@ots.treas.gov, or send a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
facsimile transmission to (202) 906–
7755. (Prior notice identifying the
materials you will be requesting will
assist us in serving you.) We schedule
appointments on business days between
10 a.m. and 4 p.m. In most cases,
appointments will be available the next
business day following the date we
receive a request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David W. Riley, Senior Analyst, (202)
906–6669; Capital Policy, Karen
Osterloh, Special Counsel, (202) 906–
6639, Regulations and Legislation
Division, or Gary Jeffers, Senior
Attorney, (202) 906–6457, Business
Transactions Division, Office of Thrift
Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20552.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Discussion
A savings association must obtain
OTS approval (or non-objection) before
it may include subordinated debt
securities or mandatorily redeemable
preferred stock in supplementary (tier 2)
capital. OTS rules at 12 CFR 563.81 set
forth application and notice procedures,
requirements that securities must meet
in order to be included in
supplementary capital, and conditions
for OTS approval (or non-objection),
and also address other matters.
OTS is proposing to update this rule.
The proposed rule would delete several
unnecessary or outdated requirements
and would conform certain provisions,
such as maturity period requirements
and purchaser restrictions, to the rules
issued by the other federal banking
agencies. In addition, the proposed rule
would reconcile conflicting OTS rules,
add appropriate statutory crossreferences, and rewrite the rule in plain
language. A section-by-section
description of the proposed rule
follows.
Scope—Proposed § 563.81(a)
Paragraph (a) sets out the scope of the
proposed rule. This new paragraph
states that a savings association must
comply with § 563.81 if it wishes to
include covered securities in
supplementary capital under 12 CFR
567.5(b). Paragraph (a) also states that
§ 563.81 does not apply if a savings
association does not intend to include
covered securities in supplementary
capital. OTS notes that a savings
association that issues subordinated
debt securities must comply with the
general borrowing limitations at 12 CFR
563.80, whether or not the savings
association intends to include the
securities in supplementary capital.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37863
Application and Notice Procedures—
Proposed § 563.81(b)
OTS has substantially amended its
application processing rules in the past
years. As a result, 12 CFR part 516
contains various procedures that
overlap and duplicate the application
processing requirements set out in
existing § 563.81. Proposed paragraph
(b) would streamline the rule by crossreferencing the application and notice
filing procedures at part 516, subpart A.
The proposed rule would also clarify
that a savings association may file its
application or notice before or after it
issues covered securities, but may not
include the covered securities in
supplementary capital until OTS
approves the application or does not
object to the notice.
The proposed rule includes a new
provision at paragraph (b)(2). This
provision reminds savings associations
that they must comply with OTS
securities offering rules at 12 CFR part
563g by filing an offering circular for a
proposed issuance of covered securities,
unless the offering qualifies for an
exemption under that part.
Securities Requirements—Proposed
§ 563.81(c)
Proposed paragraph (c) addresses the
form of securities, maturity
requirements, mandatory prepayment
restrictions, and indenture agreements.
Form. The existing rule contains
various requirements regarding the form
of covered securities.1 Paragraph (c)(1)
of the proposed rule would restate these
requirements with certain
modifications. Under the proposed rule,
each certificate evidencing a covered
security must:
• Bear a legend indicating that the
security is not a savings account or
deposit, and is not insured by the
United States or any agency or fund of
the United States.
• State that the security is
subordinated on liquidation, as to
principal, interest, and premium, to all
claims against the savings association
that have the same priority as savings
accounts or a higher priority.
• State that the security is not secured
by the savings association’s assets or the
assets of any affiliate of the savings
association.
• State that the security is not eligible
collateral for a loan by the savings
association.
• Restate certain statutory
prohibitions. The existing rule requires
covered securities to restate the
prohibition on the payment of
1 12
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
CFR 563.81(d)(1).
03JYP1
37864
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_1
dividends or interest at 12 U.S.C.
1828(b) (prohibiting payments while an
insured depository institution is in
default on payment of its Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
assessment). The proposed rule adds
that subordinated debt securities must
restate the prohibition on the payment
of principal and interest at 12 U.S.C.
1831o(h) (prohibiting payments by a
critically undercapitalized insured
depository institution).2
• For subordinated debt securities,
state (or refer to a document stating) the
terms under which the savings
association may prepay the obligation.
• State (or refer to a document
stating) that the savings association
must obtain OTS approval before the
voluntarily prepayment of principal on
subordinated debt securities, the
acceleration of payment of principal on
subordinated debt securities, or the
voluntarily redemption of mandatorily
redeemable preferred stock (other than
scheduled redemptions), if the savings
association fails to meet certain capital
tests before or after the repayment. The
current rule refers to regulatory capital
standards at 12 CFR part 567. The
proposed rule adds that OTS approval is
required if the savings association is
undercapitalized, significantly
undercapitalized, or critically
undercapitalized under prompt
corrective action standards (PCA
standards) at 12 CFR part 565.
The proposed rule would delete three
provisions that are codified as form
requirements in the existing rule. First,
the proposed rule would delete various
purchaser prohibitions. Under the
existing rule, each certificate evidencing
covered securities must state that the
issuer is prohibited from selling the
covered securities to another savings
association or to a corporate affiliate of
a savings association, without the prior
written approval of OTS. The existing
rule, however, permits an issuer to sell
covered securities to its corporate
affiliates, or to a diversified savings and
loan holding company and its nonsavings association affiliates.3
The Federal Home Loan Bank Board
(FHLBB), as the operating head of the
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance
Corporation (FSLIC), originally
promulgated this provision. The
purchaser restriction was primarily
intended to protect FSLIC and was
based on the view that no risk is
2 OTS notes that certain prepayments may be
capital distributions that are subject to 12 CFR part
563, subpart E.
3 12 CFR 563.81(d)(1)(i)(B). This restriction is
restated in various forms in several other places in
the existing rule. See 12 CFR 563.81(d)(1)(vi)(C),
(d)(3)(ii), and (k)(3)(ii).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
transferred outside the group of
institutions with FSLIC-insured
accounts when the purchaser is another
insured savings association or its
affiliate.4 OTS questions whether it is
appropriate to continue to impose this
requirement on covered securities.
Neither FDIC, which is charged with the
primary responsibility of protecting the
Deposit Insurance Fund, nor the other
federal banking agencies impose this
requirement on other insured depository
institutions that issue similar securities.
Moreover, other existing OTS rules
provide some protection. For example,
OTS capital rules protect the Deposit
Insurance Fund by requiring savings
associations to deduct reciprocal
holdings of depository institution
capital instruments from total capital.5
Accordingly, OTS proposes to delete the
purchaser restriction.6
OTS also proposes to delete the
existing requirement that all certificates
evidencing subordinated debt must state
that the savings association retains the
right to prepay the subordinated debt,
without premium or other penalty,
during the 15 months immediately prior
to the maturity date.7 This requirement
ensures that a savings association has
the ability to repay early where, for
example, the savings association is able
to refinance the debt on more favorable
terms. The requirement, however, also
prevents a savings association from
bargaining away its right to prepay in
return for a lower interest rate or other
favorable terms. In recent years, savings
associations have frequently requested,
and OTS has granted, waivers of this 15month prepayment provision. As a
result, OTS proposes to eliminate this
provision as a requirement for
subordinated debt issuances.
Finally, the existing rule requires
certificates evidencing subordinated
debt to include certain provisions using
language prescribed in the regulation.8
Two of these provisions address various
issues related to FDIC’s obligations as
receiver for the issuer. A third provision
addresses the purchaser restrictions,
which are discussed above. The
proposed rule does not include
4 50
FR 20550 (May 17, 1985).
5 12 CFR 567.5(c)(2)(i). The Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB), and
FDIC have similar capital rules. See 12 CFR part 3,
Appendix A, § 2(c)(6)(ii) (OCC); 12 CFR part 208,
Appendix A, § II.B.(iii) and part 225, Appendix A,
§ II.B.(iii) (FRB); and 12 CFR part 325, Appendix A,
§ I.B.(4) (FDIC).
6 For similar reasons, OTS proposes to delete
existing 12 CFR 563.81(d)(3)(i), which prohibits the
sale of subordinated debt securities to a Federal
Home Loan Bank or to FDIC.
7 12 CFR 563.81(d)(1)(iii).
8 12 CFR 563.81(d)(1)(vi).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
prescribed language. Instead, OTS will
prescribe language for certificates and
related documents in its Application
Processing Handbook. This will permit
OTS to amend the required text
promptly to reflect revised laws and
regulations and other changed
circumstances. OTS specifically
requests comments on whether it should
revise the current language when it is
incorporated in the Application
Processing Handbook.
Maturity requirements. The proposed
rule at § 563.81(c)(2) addresses maturity
requirements. Under the existing OTS
rule, a covered security must have an
original period to maturity (or to
required redemption) of at least seven
years. In addition, OTS’s rule prescribes
a formula that limits the amount of
required sinking fund payments,
required prepayments, required
purchase-fund payments, required
reserve allocations, and required
redemptions that may occur during the
first six years that a covered security is
outstanding.9 By contrast, the other
banking agencies’ rules require that
subordinated debt securities and
mandatorily redeemable preferred stock
must have a five-year original weighted
average maturity to be included in Tier
2 capital.10
Depending upon the payment
schedule applicable to a particular
covered security and other factors,
OTS’s rules could require an original
weighted average maturity that is
shorter—or longer—than five years.
Ultimately, however, OTS believes that
the five-year original weighted average
maturity requirement may be more
flexible than its current rule because the
five-year requirement does not impose a
specific formula limiting the amount of
permissible repayments, payments, and
reserve allocations that may be made
during the first six years that the
covered security is outstanding.
Accordingly, OTS proposes to change
its rule to state that covered securities
must have an original weighted average
maturity (or period to required
redemption) of at least five years. OTS
9 12 CFR 563.81(d)(2). During the first six years
that a covered security is outstanding, these items
may not exceed the original principal amount or
original redemption price of the covered securities
multiplied by a specified fraction. The numerator
of the fraction is the number of years elapsed since
the issuance of the covered security. The
denominator of the fraction is the number of years
in the original period to maturity or required
redemption.
10 OCC and FRB rules use the phrase ‘‘original
weighted average maturity,’’ while FDIC rules use
the phrase ‘‘original average maturity.’’ See 12 CFR
3.100(f)(1) (OCC); 12 CFR part 208, Appendix A,
§ II.A.2.d.(ii) and part 225, Appendix A,
§ II.A.2.d.(i) (FRB); and 12 CFR part 325, Appendix
A, § I.A.2.(d) (FDIC).
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
notes that this change would conform
this aspect of its capital rules to the
capital rules of the other banking
agencies and is consistent with section
303 of the Riegle Community
Development and Regulatory
Improvement Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C.
4803). Section 303 directs the agencies
to work to make uniform regulations
and guidelines implementing common
statutory or supervisory policies,
consistent with the principles of safety
and soundness, statutory law and
policy, and the public interest.
Mandatory prepayment of principal.
The proposed rule at § 563.81(c)(3)
would restate the current rules
regarding mandatory prepayment of
subordinated debt.11 Specifically, the
proposed rule states that subordinated
debt securities may not provide events
of default or contain other provisions
that could result in a mandatory
prepayment of principal, other than
events of default that:
• Arise from the savings association’s
failure to make timely payment of
interest or principal.
• Arise from its failure to comply
with reasonable financial, operating,
and maintenance covenants of a type
that are customarily included in
indentures for publicly offered debt
securities,
• Relate to bankruptcy, insolvency,
receivership, or similar events.
As noted above, the proposed rule
would continue to state that any
acceleration of payment of principal on
a subordinated debt security by a
savings association that fails to meet
certain capital requirements would be
subject to OTS prior approval.
All of the banking agencies allow for
the mandatory prepayment or
acceleration of principal upon events of
default related to bankruptcy,
insolvency, receivership, and similar
events.12 However, there is no uniform
approach with respect to prepayment or
acceleration upon other events of
default.13 OTS seeks public comment
whether it should revise this provision.
Commenters should address whether
the rules issued by any other Federal
banking agency more appropriately
address events of default that may
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_1
11 12
CFR 563.81(b)(3).
CFR 250.166(b)(2) (FRB); and 12 CFR part
325, Appendix A, § I.A.2.(c)(2) and (d) (FDIC). See
Comptroller’s Licensing Manual, Subordinated Debt
(November 2003), pp 15–16.
13 12 CFR 250.166 (FRB); 12 CFR part 325,
Appendix A, § I.A.2.(d) (FDIC); and 12 CFR part 3,
Appendix A, § 2(b)(4) and Comptroller’s Licensing
Manual, Subordinated Debt (November 2003)
(OCC).
12 12
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
trigger mandatory prepayment or
acceleration of principal.
Indenture requirements. The current
rule requires savings associations to use
an indenture for subordinated debt
securities.14 OTS proposes to update the
monetary thresholds in these indenture
requirements to reflect statutory changes
in the Trust Indenture Act of 1939
(TIA). 15 U.S.C. 77aaa et seq.
In addition to these updates, OTS is
seeking public comment on additional
possible revisions to the indenture
requirements. For example, the current
rule requires a savings association to use
an indenture for all subordinated debt
security issuances. The TIA generally
requires indentures for debt
instruments, but does not require an
indenture where the underlying
securities are exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933
(Securities Act).15 One such exemption
is available for offerings made solely to
accredited investors.16 The Securities
Act and the TIA exempt such offerings
because accredited investors are
considered to have sufficient financial
and professional resources and
sophistication to analyze the offering,
make informed decisions, and defend
and exercise their rights.17 In recent
years, OTS has waived the indenture
requirement where subordinated debt
securities are issued to accredited
investors that are top-tier parent holding
companies of the issuer (or subsidiaries
of these holding companies), provided a
paying agent agreement is in place.
These waivers are conditioned upon the
savings association’s representation that
it will provide OTS with a draft
indenture before the debt holder sells or
assigns any of the debt securities to an
unaffiliated third party. In addition, the
savings association must agree that the
indenture will apply to all unaffiliated
third party debt holders. OTS is
considering exempting such issuances
from the indenture requirements in the
final rule and seeks comment on this
possible change. Commenters are
invited to address whether OTS should
exempt offerings to accredited investors
that are holding companies of the issuer
(or their subsidiaries) from the
14 12
CFR 563.81(d)(4).
U.S.C. 77ddd.
16 15 U.S.C. 77d(6).
17 For example, ‘‘accredited investors’’ include
such entities as: brokers or dealers registered under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; insurance
companies as defined in the Securities Act;
investment companies registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940; certain employee
benefit plans; directors, executive officers or general
partners of the issuer; natural persons with income
or net worth in excess of specified limits; and
certain trusts with assets in access of specified
limits. 17 CFR 230.501(a). See 15 U.S.C. 77(a)(15).
15 15
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37865
indenture requirement, and whether it
should also exempt offerings to
unaffiliated accredited investors.
OTS Review—Proposed § 563.81(d)
Proposed paragraph (d)(1) states that
OTS will review notices and
applications under the application
processing procedures at 12 CFR part
516, subpart E. In addition, proposed
paragraph (d)(2) sets out the factors that
OTS will consider in its review of a
notice or application. These criteria are
based on the existing rule with minor
changes.18 In reviewing notices and
applications under this section, OTS
will consider whether:
• The issuance of the covered
securities is authorized under
applicable laws and regulations, and is
consistent with the savings association’s
charter and bylaws.
• The savings association is at least
adequately capitalized under the PCA
standards and meets the regulatory
capital requirements. The current rule
refers only to the regulatory capital
requirements at 12 CFR part 567. The
proposed rule would add the reference
to the PCA standards at 12 CFR part
565.
• The savings association is or will be
able to service the covered securities.
• The covered securities are
consistent with the requirements
regarding the form of securities,
limitations on terms, prepayment
restrictions, use of an indenture, and
other requirements imposed under the
rule.
• The covered securities and related
transactions sufficiently transfer risk
from the Deposit Insurance Fund.
• OTS has no objection to the
issuance based on the savings
association’s overall policies, condition,
and operations.19
The existing rule states that issuances
of covered securities are subject to seven
standard conditions. OTS has decided
to delete most of these conditions. OTS
has determined that many of the
standard conditions are unnecessary
because they are stated elsewhere as
proposed regulatory requirements. For
example, reporting is addressed in
proposed paragraph (g),20 and
amendments to covered securities
following OTS review are addressed at
18 12
CFR 563.81(b).
existing rule states that OTS shall establish
non-exclusive guidelines identifying supervisory
bases that may be used to object to the inclusion
of covered securities in regulatory capital. 12 CFR
563.81(b)(2)(i). While OTS may establish such
guidance in the future, the proposed rule does not
require OTS to take this step.
20 12 CFR 563.81(k)(2) and (3).
19 The
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
37866
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
new paragraph (e).21 Other standard
conditions would be deleted because
they are contrary to current securities
law or refer to obsolete OTS
regulations.22
With these deletions, proposed
563.81(d)(3) would provide that OTS
approval or nonobjection is conditioned
upon no material changes to the
information disclosed in the application
or notice submitted to OTS.23 The
proposed rule would also expressly
state that OTS may impose such
additional requirements or conditions as
may be necessary to protect purchasers,
the savings association, OTS, or the
Deposit Insurance Fund.
Amendments—Proposed § 563.81(e)
The proposed rule would resolve an
inconsistency in the current rules
regarding amendments to covered
securities or related documents
following OTS review. One provision
appears to require a savings association
to seek OTS approval or nonobjection
only where an amendment would not
conform to OTS regulations governing
the form or content of the covered
securities and related documents, or
where the amended securities would
not sufficiently transfer risk from the
Deposit Insurance Fund.24 The other
provision requires a savings association
to seek OTS approval or nonobjection
for all amendments that occur after the
conclusion of the OTS review.25 OTS
believes that it should have the
opportunity to review all amendments
to covered securities and related
documents. Accordingly, the proposed
rule requires OTS approval or
nonobjection for all amendments after
OTS review.
Sale of Covered Securities—Proposed
§ 563.81(f)
The existing rule provides that a
savings association must complete the
sale of securities within one year of OTS
approval or nonobjection and that OTS
may extend this period upon a timely
request.26 Proposed paragraph (f)
restates this provision in plain language
without substantive change.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_1
Reports—Proposed § 563.81(g)
The existing rule requires savings
associations to submit various reports in
connection with the sale of covered
21 12
CFR 563.81(k)(5) and (6).
CFR 563.81(k)(1) and (7).
23 12 CFR 563.81(k)(4).
24 12 CFR 563.81(k)(5).
25 12 CFR 563.81(a).
26 12 CFR 563.81(g).
22 12
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Jun 30, 2006
securities.27 The proposed rule would
restate and consolidate all reporting
requirements in one provision. The
proposed rule does not modify the
substance of the reporting requirement.
Obsolete Provisions
In addition to the revisions discussed
above, OTS proposes to delete certain
obsolete provisions of the existing rules.
These existing provisions include:
• 12 CFR 563.81(b)(2)(i)(B), which
refers to non-existent OTS regulations at
12 CFR 563.160 and 563.172.
• 12 CFR 563.81(d) (introductory
paragraph), which states that OTS may
waive certain requirements. This
provision duplicates (and conflicts
with) OTS general waiver authority at
12 CFR 500.30(a).
• 12 CFR 563.81(k)(7). This section
conflicts with 12 CFR 563.76, which
prohibits the sale of debt securities on
the premises of a savings association.
II. Solicitation of Comments Regarding
the Use of Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-LeachBliley Act (12 U.S.C. 4809) requires
Federal banking agencies to use ‘‘plain
language’’ in all proposed and final
rules published after January 1, 2000.
OTS invites comments on how to make
this proposed rule easier to understand.
For example:
(1) Have we organized the material to
suit your needs? If not, how could the
material be better organized?
(2) Do we clearly state the
requirements in the rule? If not, how
could the rule be more clearly stated?
(3) Does the rule contain technical
language or jargon that is not clear? If
so, what language requires clarification?
(4) Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the rule easier to
understand? If so, what changes to the
format would make the rule easier to
understand?
III. Executive Order 12866
The Director of OTS has determined
that this proposed rule does not
constitute a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ for purposes of Executive Order
12866.
IV. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Today’s proposed rule merely revises
an existing rule to delete unnecessary,
outdated, and conflicting requirements,
to add appropriate statutory crossreferences, and to rewrite the rule in
plain language. Accordingly, OTS has
27 These reporting requirements are contained in
12 CFR 563.81(h) and in the standard conditions at
12 CFR 563.81(k)(2) and (3).
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
determined that the proposed rule will
not result in expenditures by state,
local, or tribal governments or by the
private sector of $100 million or more
and that a budgetary impact statement is
not required under section 202 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601), the Director certifies that
this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Today’s proposed rule merely revises an
existing rule to delete unnecessary,
outdated, and conflicting requirements,
to add appropriate statutory crossreferences, and to rewrite the rule in
plain language.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The information collection
requirements in the existing OTS rules
at 12 CFR 563.81 were previously
approved under OMB control number
1550–00xx. The proposed rule would
continue to incorporate these
requirements and does not make any
substantive changes that affect the
overall burden of compliance.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 563
Accounting, Administrative practice
and procedure, Advertising, Conflict of
interest, Crime, Currency, Holding
companies, Investments, Mortgages,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Savings associations,
Securities, Surety bond.
Accordingly, the Office of Thrift
Supervision proposes to amend 12 CFR
part 563 as set forth below:
PART 563—SAVINGS
ASSOCIATIONS—OPERATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 563
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 375b, 1462, 1462a,
1463, 1464, 1467a, 1468, 1817, 1820, 1828,
1831o, 3806; 31 U.S.C. 5318; 42 U.S.C. 4106.
2. Revise § 563.81 to read as follows:
§ 563.81 Inclusion of subordinated debt
securities and mandatorily redeemable
preferred stock as supplementary capital.
(a) Scope. A savings association must
comply with this section in order to
include subordinated debt securities or
mandatorily redeemable preferred stock
(‘‘covered securities’’) in supplementary
capital under 12 CFR 567.5(b). If a
savings association does not include
covered securities in supplementary
capital, it is not required to comply with
this section.
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(b) Application and notice
procedures. (1) A savings association
must file an application or notice under
12 CFR part 516, subpart A seeking OTS
approval of, or nonobjection to, the
inclusion of covered securities in
supplementary capital. The savings
association may file its application or
notice before or after it issues covered
securities, but may not include covered
securities in supplementary capital until
OTS approves the application or does
not object to the notice.
(2) A savings association must also
comply with the securities offering rules
at 12 CFR part 563g by filing an offering
circular for a proposed issuance of
covered securities, unless the offering
qualifies for an exemption under that
part.
(c) Securities requirements. To be
included in supplementary capital,
covered securities must meet the
following requirements:
(1) Form. (i) Each certificate
evidencing a covered security must:
(A) Bear the following legend on its
face, in bold type: ‘‘This security is not
a savings account or deposit and it is
not insured by the United States or any
agency or fund of the United States;’’
(B) State that the security is
subordinated on liquidation, as to
principal, interest, and premium, to all
claims against the savings association
that have the same priority as savings
accounts or a higher priority;
(C) State that the security is not
secured by the savings association’s
assets or the assets of any affiliate of the
savings association, as defined in 12
CFR 583.2;
(D) State that the security is not
eligible collateral for a loan by the
savings association;
(E) State the prohibition on the
payment of dividends or interest at 12
U.S.C. 1828(b) and, in the case of
subordinated debt securities, state the
prohibition on the payment of principal
and interest at 12 U.S.C. 1831o(h);
(F) For subordinated debt securities,
state or refer to a document stating the
terms under which the savings
association may prepay the obligation;
and
(G) State or refer to a document
stating that the savings association must
obtain OTS approval before the
voluntarily prepayment of principal on
subordinated debt securities, the
acceleration of payment of principal on
subordinated debt securities, or the
voluntarily redemption of mandatorily
redeemable preferred stock (other than
scheduled redemptions), if the savings
association is undercapitalized,
significantly undercapitalized, or
critically undercapitalized as described
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
in § 565.4(b) of this chapter, fails to
meet the regulatory capital requirements
at 12 CFR part 567, or would fail to meet
any of these standards following the
payment.
(ii) A savings association must
include such additional statements as
OTS may prescribe for certificates,
purchase agreements, indentures, and
other related documents. OTS will
prescribe the text of these additional
statements in its Application Processing
Handbook.
(2) Maturity requirements. Covered
securities must have an original
weighted average maturity or original
weighted average period to required
redemption of at least five years.
(3) Mandatory prepayment.
Subordinated debt securities and related
documents may not provide events of
default or contain other provisions that
could result in a mandatory prepayment
of principal, other than events of default
that:
(i) Arise from the savings association’s
failure to make timely payment of
interest or principal;
(ii) Arise from its failure to comply
with reasonable financial, operating,
and maintenance covenants of a type
that are customarily included in
indentures for publicly offered debt
securities; or
(iii) Relate to bankruptcy, insolvency,
receivership, or similar events.
(4) Indenture. A savings association
must use an indenture for subordinated
debt securities. If the aggregate amount
of subordinated debt securities that are
publicly offered (excluding sales in a
non-public offering as defined in 12
CFR 563g.4) and sold in any consecutive
12-month or 36-month period exceeds
$5,000,000 or $10,000,000 respectively
(or such lesser amount that the
Securities and Exchange Commission
shall establish by rule or regulation
under 15 U.S.C. 77ddd), the indenture
must provide for:
(i) The appointment of a trustee other
than the savings association or an
affiliate of the savings association (as
defined at 12 CFR 583.2); and
(ii) Collective enforcement of the
security holders’ rights and remedies.
(d) OTS review. (1) OTS will review
notices and applications under 12 CFR
part 516, subpart E.
(2) In reviewing notices and
applications under this section, OTS
will consider whether:
(i) The issuance of the covered
securities is authorized under
applicable laws and regulations and is
consistent with the savings association’s
charter and bylaws.
(ii) The savings association is at least
adequately capitalized under § 565.4(b)
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37867
of this chapter and meets the regulatory
capital requirements at § 567.2 of this
chapter.
(iii) The savings association is or will
be able to service the covered securities.
(iv) The covered securities are
consistent with the requirements of this
section.
(v) The covered securities and related
transactions sufficiently transfer risk
from the Deposit Insurance Fund.
(vi) OTS has no objection to the
issuance based on the savings
association’s overall policies, condition,
and operations.
(3) OTS approval or nonobjection is
conditioned upon no material changes
to the information disclosed in the
application or notice submitted to OTS.
OTS may impose such additional
requirements or conditions as it may
deem necessary to protect purchasers,
the savings association, OTS, or the
Deposit Insurance Fund.
(e) Amendments. If a savings
association amends the covered
securities or related documents
following the completion of OTS
review, it must obtain OTS approval or
nonobjection under this section before it
may include the amended securities in
supplementary capital.
(f) Sale of covered securities. The
savings association must complete the
sale of covered securities within one
year after OTS approval or nonobjection
under this section. A savings association
may request an extension of the offering
period by filing a written request with
OTS. The savings association must
demonstrate good cause for the
extension and file the request at least 30
days before the expiration of the offering
period or any extension of the offering
period.
(g) Reports. A savings association
must file the following information with
OTS within 30 days after the savings
association completes the sale of
covered securities includable as
supplementary capital. If the savings
association filed its application or
notice following the completion of the
sale, it must submit this information
with its application or notice:
(1) A written report indicating the
number of purchasers, the total dollar
amount of securities sold, the net
proceeds received by the savings
association from the issuance, and the
amount of covered securities, net of all
expenses, to be included as
supplementary capital;
(2) Three copies of an executed form
of the securities and a copy of any
related documents governing the
issuance or administration of the
securities; and
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
37868
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 127 / Monday, July 3, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(3) A certification by the appropriate
executive officer indicating that the
savings association complied with all
applicable laws and regulations in
connection with the offering, issuance,
and sale of the securities.
Dated: June 26, 2006.
By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
John M. Reich,
Director.
[FR Doc. E6–10341 Filed 6–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25232; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–106–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Model
BAe 146 and Avro 146–RJ Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Model BAe 146 and Avro 146–
RJ airplanes. This proposed AD would
require repetitive inspections of the
wing top skin under the rib 0 joint strap,
and related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. This proposed AD
results from a report of a significant
crack in the wing top skin under the rib
0 joint strap. We are proposing this AD
to detect and correct corrosion and
cracking in that area, which could result
in reduced structural integrity of the
wing.
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 2, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_1
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Jun 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact British Aerospace Regional
Aircraft American Support, 13850
Mclearen Road, Herndon, Virginia
20171, for service information identified
in this proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2125;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2006–25232; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–106–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) notified us that an unsafe
condition may exist on certain BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Model
BAe 146 and Avro 146–RJ airplanes.
The EASA advises that a significant
crack in the wing top skin under the rib
0 joint strap was found during a
scheduled inspection of adjacent
structure. This cracking may also occur
on other airplanes having top wing
skins made from the same aluminum
alloy as the top wing skin on the subject
airplane. Cracking in this area, if not
corrected, could result in reduced
structural integrity of the wing.
Relevant Service Information
The manufacturer has issued BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Alert
Inspection Service Bulletin (ISB)
ISB.57–a071, dated April 12, 2006. The
ISB describes procedures for repetitive
ultrasonic inspections for defects
(including corrosion and cracking) of
the wing top skin under the rib 0 joint
strap, at the outer row of fasteners. The
initial compliance time ranges from the
earlier of 500 flights or 3 months (for
airplanes with existing repairs and no
previous inspection of the subject area)
to the earlier of 4,000 flight cycles or 24
months (for airplanes previously
inspected). For any defect found, the
ISB specifies the related investigative
actions of a radiographic inspection of
the top wing skin to detect corrosion
and cracking, and a high frequency eddy
current inspection around the nuts of
the stringer flanges to detect cracking
and corrosion. The ISB describes the
corrective actions of repairing the cracks
or corrosion; alternatively, the ISB
specifies operators may obtain an
approved BAE Systems repair scheme.
Accomplishing the actions specified
in the ISB is intended to adequately
address the unsafe condition. The EASA
mandated the ISB and issued emergency
airworthiness directive 2006–0091–E,
dated April 20, 2006, to ensure the
continued airworthiness of these
airplanes in the European Union.
The ISB refers to BAe 146 Series/
AVRO–RJ Series Nondestructive Testing
Manual 57–10–12, Revision 23, dated
November 15, 2003, as an additional
source of service information for the
radiographic and high frequency eddy
current inspections. The ISB refers to
BAe Structural Repair Manual 57–10–
15–001 as an additional source of
service information for the repair.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
These airplane models are
manufactured in the United Kingdom
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 127 (Monday, July 3, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37862-37868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10341]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision
12 CFR Part 563
[No. 2006-24]
RIN 1550-AC06
Subordinated Debt Securities and Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred
Stock
AGENCY: Office of Thrift Supervision, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 37863]]
SUMMARY: A savings association must obtain OTS approval (or non-
objection) before it may include subordinated debt securities or
mandatorily redeemable preferred stock in supplementary (tier 2)
capital. OTS rules at 12 CFR 563.81 set forth application and notice
procedures, requirements that securities must meet in order to be
included in supplementary capital, and conditions for OTS approval (or
non-objection), and also address other matters.
OTS is proposing to update this rule. The proposed rule would
delete several unnecessary or outdated requirements and would conform
certain provisions, such as maturity period requirements and purchaser
restrictions, to the rules issued by the other federal banking
agencies. In addition, the proposed rule would reconcile conflicting
rules, add appropriate statutory cross-references, and rewrite the rule
in plain language.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by No. 2006-24, by any
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail address: regs.comments@ots.treas.gov. Please
include No. 2006-24 in the subject line of the message and include your
name and telephone number in the message.
Fax: (202) 906-6518.
Mail: Regulation Comments, Chief Counsel's Office, Office
of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552,
Attention: No. 2006-24.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Guard's Desk, East Lobby Entrance,
1700 G Street, NW., from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. on business days, Attention:
Regulation Comments, Chief Counsel's Office, Attention: No. 2006-24.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received will be
posted without change to the OTS Internet Site at https://
www.ots.treas.gov/pagehtml.cfm?catNumber=67&an=1, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.ots.treas.gov/
pagehtml.cfm?catNumber=67&an=1. In addition, you may inspect comments
at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., by appointment. To make
an appointment for access, call (202) 906-5922, send an e-mail to
public.info@ots.treas.gov, or send a facsimile transmission to (202)
906-7755. (Prior notice identifying the materials you will be
requesting will assist us in serving you.) We schedule appointments on
business days between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. In most cases, appointments
will be available the next business day following the date we receive a
request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David W. Riley, Senior Analyst, (202)
906-6669; Capital Policy, Karen Osterloh, Special Counsel, (202) 906-
6639, Regulations and Legislation Division, or Gary Jeffers, Senior
Attorney, (202) 906-6457, Business Transactions Division, Office of
Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Discussion
A savings association must obtain OTS approval (or non-objection)
before it may include subordinated debt securities or mandatorily
redeemable preferred stock in supplementary (tier 2) capital. OTS rules
at 12 CFR 563.81 set forth application and notice procedures,
requirements that securities must meet in order to be included in
supplementary capital, and conditions for OTS approval (or non-
objection), and also address other matters.
OTS is proposing to update this rule. The proposed rule would
delete several unnecessary or outdated requirements and would conform
certain provisions, such as maturity period requirements and purchaser
restrictions, to the rules issued by the other federal banking
agencies. In addition, the proposed rule would reconcile conflicting
OTS rules, add appropriate statutory cross-references, and rewrite the
rule in plain language. A section-by-section description of the
proposed rule follows.
Scope--Proposed Sec. 563.81(a)
Paragraph (a) sets out the scope of the proposed rule. This new
paragraph states that a savings association must comply with Sec.
563.81 if it wishes to include covered securities in supplementary
capital under 12 CFR 567.5(b). Paragraph (a) also states that Sec.
563.81 does not apply if a savings association does not intend to
include covered securities in supplementary capital. OTS notes that a
savings association that issues subordinated debt securities must
comply with the general borrowing limitations at 12 CFR 563.80, whether
or not the savings association intends to include the securities in
supplementary capital.
Application and Notice Procedures--Proposed Sec. 563.81(b)
OTS has substantially amended its application processing rules in
the past years. As a result, 12 CFR part 516 contains various
procedures that overlap and duplicate the application processing
requirements set out in existing Sec. 563.81. Proposed paragraph (b)
would streamline the rule by cross-referencing the application and
notice filing procedures at part 516, subpart A. The proposed rule
would also clarify that a savings association may file its application
or notice before or after it issues covered securities, but may not
include the covered securities in supplementary capital until OTS
approves the application or does not object to the notice.
The proposed rule includes a new provision at paragraph (b)(2).
This provision reminds savings associations that they must comply with
OTS securities offering rules at 12 CFR part 563g by filing an offering
circular for a proposed issuance of covered securities, unless the
offering qualifies for an exemption under that part.
Securities Requirements--Proposed Sec. 563.81(c)
Proposed paragraph (c) addresses the form of securities, maturity
requirements, mandatory prepayment restrictions, and indenture
agreements.
Form. The existing rule contains various requirements regarding the
form of covered securities.\1\ Paragraph (c)(1) of the proposed rule
would restate these requirements with certain modifications. Under the
proposed rule, each certificate evidencing a covered security must:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 12 CFR 563.81(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bear a legend indicating that the security is not a
savings account or deposit, and is not insured by the United States or
any agency or fund of the United States.
State that the security is subordinated on liquidation, as
to principal, interest, and premium, to all claims against the savings
association that have the same priority as savings accounts or a higher
priority.
State that the security is not secured by the savings
association's assets or the assets of any affiliate of the savings
association.
State that the security is not eligible collateral for a
loan by the savings association.
Restate certain statutory prohibitions. The existing rule
requires covered securities to restate the prohibition on the payment
of
[[Page 37864]]
dividends or interest at 12 U.S.C. 1828(b) (prohibiting payments while
an insured depository institution is in default on payment of its
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) assessment). The proposed
rule adds that subordinated debt securities must restate the
prohibition on the payment of principal and interest at 12 U.S.C.
1831o(h) (prohibiting payments by a critically undercapitalized insured
depository institution).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ OTS notes that certain prepayments may be capital
distributions that are subject to 12 CFR part 563, subpart E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For subordinated debt securities, state (or refer to a
document stating) the terms under which the savings association may
prepay the obligation.
State (or refer to a document stating) that the savings
association must obtain OTS approval before the voluntarily prepayment
of principal on subordinated debt securities, the acceleration of
payment of principal on subordinated debt securities, or the
voluntarily redemption of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock (other
than scheduled redemptions), if the savings association fails to meet
certain capital tests before or after the repayment. The current rule
refers to regulatory capital standards at 12 CFR part 567. The proposed
rule adds that OTS approval is required if the savings association is
undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically
undercapitalized under prompt corrective action standards (PCA
standards) at 12 CFR part 565.
The proposed rule would delete three provisions that are codified
as form requirements in the existing rule. First, the proposed rule
would delete various purchaser prohibitions. Under the existing rule,
each certificate evidencing covered securities must state that the
issuer is prohibited from selling the covered securities to another
savings association or to a corporate affiliate of a savings
association, without the prior written approval of OTS. The existing
rule, however, permits an issuer to sell covered securities to its
corporate affiliates, or to a diversified savings and loan holding
company and its non-savings association affiliates.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 12 CFR 563.81(d)(1)(i)(B). This restriction is restated in
various forms in several other places in the existing rule. See 12
CFR 563.81(d)(1)(vi)(C), (d)(3)(ii), and (k)(3)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB), as the operating head of
the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC), originally
promulgated this provision. The purchaser restriction was primarily
intended to protect FSLIC and was based on the view that no risk is
transferred outside the group of institutions with FSLIC-insured
accounts when the purchaser is another insured savings association or
its affiliate.\4\ OTS questions whether it is appropriate to continue
to impose this requirement on covered securities. Neither FDIC, which
is charged with the primary responsibility of protecting the Deposit
Insurance Fund, nor the other federal banking agencies impose this
requirement on other insured depository institutions that issue similar
securities. Moreover, other existing OTS rules provide some protection.
For example, OTS capital rules protect the Deposit Insurance Fund by
requiring savings associations to deduct reciprocal holdings of
depository institution capital instruments from total capital.\5\
Accordingly, OTS proposes to delete the purchaser restriction.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 50 FR 20550 (May 17, 1985).
\5\ 12 CFR 567.5(c)(2)(i). The Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(FRB), and FDIC have similar capital rules. See 12 CFR part 3,
Appendix A, Sec. 2(c)(6)(ii) (OCC); 12 CFR part 208, Appendix A,
Sec. II.B.(iii) and part 225, Appendix A, Sec. II.B.(iii) (FRB);
and 12 CFR part 325, Appendix A, Sec. I.B.(4) (FDIC).
\6\ For similar reasons, OTS proposes to delete existing 12 CFR
563.81(d)(3)(i), which prohibits the sale of subordinated debt
securities to a Federal Home Loan Bank or to FDIC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTS also proposes to delete the existing requirement that all
certificates evidencing subordinated debt must state that the savings
association retains the right to prepay the subordinated debt, without
premium or other penalty, during the 15 months immediately prior to the
maturity date.\7\ This requirement ensures that a savings association
has the ability to repay early where, for example, the savings
association is able to refinance the debt on more favorable terms. The
requirement, however, also prevents a savings association from
bargaining away its right to prepay in return for a lower interest rate
or other favorable terms. In recent years, savings associations have
frequently requested, and OTS has granted, waivers of this 15-month
prepayment provision. As a result, OTS proposes to eliminate this
provision as a requirement for subordinated debt issuances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 12 CFR 563.81(d)(1)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the existing rule requires certificates evidencing
subordinated debt to include certain provisions using language
prescribed in the regulation.\8\ Two of these provisions address
various issues related to FDIC's obligations as receiver for the
issuer. A third provision addresses the purchaser restrictions, which
are discussed above. The proposed rule does not include prescribed
language. Instead, OTS will prescribe language for certificates and
related documents in its Application Processing Handbook. This will
permit OTS to amend the required text promptly to reflect revised laws
and regulations and other changed circumstances. OTS specifically
requests comments on whether it should revise the current language when
it is incorporated in the Application Processing Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 12 CFR 563.81(d)(1)(vi).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maturity requirements. The proposed rule at Sec. 563.81(c)(2)
addresses maturity requirements. Under the existing OTS rule, a covered
security must have an original period to maturity (or to required
redemption) of at least seven years. In addition, OTS's rule prescribes
a formula that limits the amount of required sinking fund payments,
required prepayments, required purchase-fund payments, required reserve
allocations, and required redemptions that may occur during the first
six years that a covered security is outstanding.\9\ By contrast, the
other banking agencies' rules require that subordinated debt securities
and mandatorily redeemable preferred stock must have a five-year
original weighted average maturity to be included in Tier 2
capital.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 12 CFR 563.81(d)(2). During the first six years that a
covered security is outstanding, these items may not exceed the
original principal amount or original redemption price of the
covered securities multiplied by a specified fraction. The numerator
of the fraction is the number of years elapsed since the issuance of
the covered security. The denominator of the fraction is the number
of years in the original period to maturity or required redemption.
\10\ OCC and FRB rules use the phrase ``original weighted
average maturity,'' while FDIC rules use the phrase ``original
average maturity.'' See 12 CFR 3.100(f)(1) (OCC); 12 CFR part 208,
Appendix A, Sec. II.A.2.d.(ii) and part 225, Appendix A, Sec.
II.A.2.d.(i) (FRB); and 12 CFR part 325, Appendix A, Sec. I.A.2.(d)
(FDIC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depending upon the payment schedule applicable to a particular
covered security and other factors, OTS's rules could require an
original weighted average maturity that is shorter--or longer--than
five years. Ultimately, however, OTS believes that the five-year
original weighted average maturity requirement may be more flexible
than its current rule because the five-year requirement does not impose
a specific formula limiting the amount of permissible repayments,
payments, and reserve allocations that may be made during the first six
years that the covered security is outstanding. Accordingly, OTS
proposes to change its rule to state that covered securities must have
an original weighted average maturity (or period to required
redemption) of at least five years. OTS
[[Page 37865]]
notes that this change would conform this aspect of its capital rules
to the capital rules of the other banking agencies and is consistent
with section 303 of the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory
Improvement Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4803). Section 303 directs the
agencies to work to make uniform regulations and guidelines
implementing common statutory or supervisory policies, consistent with
the principles of safety and soundness, statutory law and policy, and
the public interest.
Mandatory prepayment of principal. The proposed rule at Sec.
563.81(c)(3) would restate the current rules regarding mandatory
prepayment of subordinated debt.\11\ Specifically, the proposed rule
states that subordinated debt securities may not provide events of
default or contain other provisions that could result in a mandatory
prepayment of principal, other than events of default that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 12 CFR 563.81(b)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arise from the savings association's failure to make
timely payment of interest or principal.
Arise from its failure to comply with reasonable
financial, operating, and maintenance covenants of a type that are
customarily included in indentures for publicly offered debt
securities,
Relate to bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership, or similar
events.
As noted above, the proposed rule would continue to state that any
acceleration of payment of principal on a subordinated debt security by
a savings association that fails to meet certain capital requirements
would be subject to OTS prior approval.
All of the banking agencies allow for the mandatory prepayment or
acceleration of principal upon events of default related to bankruptcy,
insolvency, receivership, and similar events.\12\ However, there is no
uniform approach with respect to prepayment or acceleration upon other
events of default.\13\ OTS seeks public comment whether it should
revise this provision. Commenters should address whether the rules
issued by any other Federal banking agency more appropriately address
events of default that may trigger mandatory prepayment or acceleration
of principal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 12 CFR 250.166(b)(2) (FRB); and 12 CFR part 325, Appendix
A, Sec. I.A.2.(c)(2) and (d) (FDIC). See Comptroller's Licensing
Manual, Subordinated Debt (November 2003), pp 15-16.
\13\ 12 CFR 250.166 (FRB); 12 CFR part 325, Appendix A, Sec.
I.A.2.(d) (FDIC); and 12 CFR part 3, Appendix A, Sec. 2(b)(4) and
Comptroller's Licensing Manual, Subordinated Debt (November 2003)
(OCC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indenture requirements. The current rule requires savings
associations to use an indenture for subordinated debt securities.\14\
OTS proposes to update the monetary thresholds in these indenture
requirements to reflect statutory changes in the Trust Indenture Act of
1939 (TIA). 15 U.S.C. 77aaa et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 12 CFR 563.81(d)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to these updates, OTS is seeking public comment on
additional possible revisions to the indenture requirements. For
example, the current rule requires a savings association to use an
indenture for all subordinated debt security issuances. The TIA
generally requires indentures for debt instruments, but does not
require an indenture where the underlying securities are exempt from
registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act).\15\ One
such exemption is available for offerings made solely to accredited
investors.\16\ The Securities Act and the TIA exempt such offerings
because accredited investors are considered to have sufficient
financial and professional resources and sophistication to analyze the
offering, make informed decisions, and defend and exercise their
rights.\17\ In recent years, OTS has waived the indenture requirement
where subordinated debt securities are issued to accredited investors
that are top-tier parent holding companies of the issuer (or
subsidiaries of these holding companies), provided a paying agent
agreement is in place. These waivers are conditioned upon the savings
association's representation that it will provide OTS with a draft
indenture before the debt holder sells or assigns any of the debt
securities to an unaffiliated third party. In addition, the savings
association must agree that the indenture will apply to all
unaffiliated third party debt holders. OTS is considering exempting
such issuances from the indenture requirements in the final rule and
seeks comment on this possible change. Commenters are invited to
address whether OTS should exempt offerings to accredited investors
that are holding companies of the issuer (or their subsidiaries) from
the indenture requirement, and whether it should also exempt offerings
to unaffiliated accredited investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 77ddd.
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 77d(6).
\17\ For example, ``accredited investors'' include such entities
as: brokers or dealers registered under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; insurance companies as defined in the Securities Act;
investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of
1940; certain employee benefit plans; directors, executive officers
or general partners of the issuer; natural persons with income or
net worth in excess of specified limits; and certain trusts with
assets in access of specified limits. 17 CFR 230.501(a). See 15
U.S.C. 77(a)(15).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTS Review--Proposed Sec. 563.81(d)
Proposed paragraph (d)(1) states that OTS will review notices and
applications under the application processing procedures at 12 CFR part
516, subpart E. In addition, proposed paragraph (d)(2) sets out the
factors that OTS will consider in its review of a notice or
application. These criteria are based on the existing rule with minor
changes.\18\ In reviewing notices and applications under this section,
OTS will consider whether:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 12 CFR 563.81(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The issuance of the covered securities is authorized under
applicable laws and regulations, and is consistent with the savings
association's charter and bylaws.
The savings association is at least adequately capitalized
under the PCA standards and meets the regulatory capital requirements.
The current rule refers only to the regulatory capital requirements at
12 CFR part 567. The proposed rule would add the reference to the PCA
standards at 12 CFR part 565.
The savings association is or will be able to service the
covered securities.
The covered securities are consistent with the
requirements regarding the form of securities, limitations on terms,
prepayment restrictions, use of an indenture, and other requirements
imposed under the rule.
The covered securities and related transactions
sufficiently transfer risk from the Deposit Insurance Fund.
OTS has no objection to the issuance based on the savings
association's overall policies, condition, and operations.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ The existing rule states that OTS shall establish non-
exclusive guidelines identifying supervisory bases that may be used
to object to the inclusion of covered securities in regulatory
capital. 12 CFR 563.81(b)(2)(i). While OTS may establish such
guidance in the future, the proposed rule does not require OTS to
take this step.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The existing rule states that issuances of covered securities are
subject to seven standard conditions. OTS has decided to delete most of
these conditions. OTS has determined that many of the standard
conditions are unnecessary because they are stated elsewhere as
proposed regulatory requirements. For example, reporting is addressed
in proposed paragraph (g),\20\ and amendments to covered securities
following OTS review are addressed at
[[Page 37866]]
new paragraph (e).\21\ Other standard conditions would be deleted
because they are contrary to current securities law or refer to
obsolete OTS regulations.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 12 CFR 563.81(k)(2) and (3).
\21\ 12 CFR 563.81(k)(5) and (6).
\22\ 12 CFR 563.81(k)(1) and (7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With these deletions, proposed 563.81(d)(3) would provide that OTS
approval or nonobjection is conditioned upon no material changes to the
information disclosed in the application or notice submitted to
OTS.\23\ The proposed rule would also expressly state that OTS may
impose such additional requirements or conditions as may be necessary
to protect purchasers, the savings association, OTS, or the Deposit
Insurance Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 12 CFR 563.81(k)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amendments--Proposed Sec. 563.81(e)
The proposed rule would resolve an inconsistency in the current
rules regarding amendments to covered securities or related documents
following OTS review. One provision appears to require a savings
association to seek OTS approval or nonobjection only where an
amendment would not conform to OTS regulations governing the form or
content of the covered securities and related documents, or where the
amended securities would not sufficiently transfer risk from the
Deposit Insurance Fund.\24\ The other provision requires a savings
association to seek OTS approval or nonobjection for all amendments
that occur after the conclusion of the OTS review.\25\ OTS believes
that it should have the opportunity to review all amendments to covered
securities and related documents. Accordingly, the proposed rule
requires OTS approval or nonobjection for all amendments after OTS
review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 12 CFR 563.81(k)(5).
\25\ 12 CFR 563.81(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sale of Covered Securities--Proposed Sec. 563.81(f)
The existing rule provides that a savings association must complete
the sale of securities within one year of OTS approval or nonobjection
and that OTS may extend this period upon a timely request.\26\ Proposed
paragraph (f) restates this provision in plain language without
substantive change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 12 CFR 563.81(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reports--Proposed Sec. 563.81(g)
The existing rule requires savings associations to submit various
reports in connection with the sale of covered securities.\27\ The
proposed rule would restate and consolidate all reporting requirements
in one provision. The proposed rule does not modify the substance of
the reporting requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ These reporting requirements are contained in 12 CFR
563.81(h) and in the standard conditions at 12 CFR 563.81(k)(2) and
(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Obsolete Provisions
In addition to the revisions discussed above, OTS proposes to
delete certain obsolete provisions of the existing rules. These
existing provisions include:
12 CFR 563.81(b)(2)(i)(B), which refers to non-existent
OTS regulations at 12 CFR 563.160 and 563.172.
12 CFR 563.81(d) (introductory paragraph), which states
that OTS may waive certain requirements. This provision duplicates (and
conflicts with) OTS general waiver authority at 12 CFR 500.30(a).
12 CFR 563.81(k)(7). This section conflicts with 12 CFR
563.76, which prohibits the sale of debt securities on the premises of
a savings association.
II. Solicitation of Comments Regarding the Use of Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (12 U.S.C. 4809) requires
Federal banking agencies to use ``plain language'' in all proposed and
final rules published after January 1, 2000. OTS invites comments on
how to make this proposed rule easier to understand. For example:
(1) Have we organized the material to suit your needs? If not, how
could the material be better organized?
(2) Do we clearly state the requirements in the rule? If not, how
could the rule be more clearly stated?
(3) Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that is not
clear? If so, what language requires clarification?
(4) Would a different format (grouping and order of sections, use
of headings, paragraphing) make the rule easier to understand? If so,
what changes to the format would make the rule easier to understand?
III. Executive Order 12866
The Director of OTS has determined that this proposed rule does not
constitute a ``significant regulatory action'' for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
IV. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Today's proposed rule merely revises an existing rule to delete
unnecessary, outdated, and conflicting requirements, to add appropriate
statutory cross-references, and to rewrite the rule in plain language.
Accordingly, OTS has determined that the proposed rule will not result
in expenditures by state, local, or tribal governments or by the
private sector of $100 million or more and that a budgetary impact
statement is not required under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601), the Director certifies that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Today's proposed rule merely revises an existing rule to
delete unnecessary, outdated, and conflicting requirements, to add
appropriate statutory cross-references, and to rewrite the rule in
plain language.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The information collection requirements in the existing OTS rules
at 12 CFR 563.81 were previously approved under OMB control number
1550-00xx. The proposed rule would continue to incorporate these
requirements and does not make any substantive changes that affect the
overall burden of compliance.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 563
Accounting, Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising,
Conflict of interest, Crime, Currency, Holding companies, Investments,
Mortgages, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Savings
associations, Securities, Surety bond.
Accordingly, the Office of Thrift Supervision proposes to amend 12
CFR part 563 as set forth below:
PART 563--SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS--OPERATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 563 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 375b, 1462, 1462a, 1463, 1464, 1467a, 1468,
1817, 1820, 1828, 1831o, 3806; 31 U.S.C. 5318; 42 U.S.C. 4106.
2. Revise Sec. 563.81 to read as follows:
Sec. 563.81 Inclusion of subordinated debt securities and mandatorily
redeemable preferred stock as supplementary capital.
(a) Scope. A savings association must comply with this section in
order to include subordinated debt securities or mandatorily redeemable
preferred stock (``covered securities'') in supplementary capital under
12 CFR 567.5(b). If a savings association does not include covered
securities in supplementary capital, it is not required to comply with
this section.
[[Page 37867]]
(b) Application and notice procedures. (1) A savings association
must file an application or notice under 12 CFR part 516, subpart A
seeking OTS approval of, or nonobjection to, the inclusion of covered
securities in supplementary capital. The savings association may file
its application or notice before or after it issues covered securities,
but may not include covered securities in supplementary capital until
OTS approves the application or does not object to the notice.
(2) A savings association must also comply with the securities
offering rules at 12 CFR part 563g by filing an offering circular for a
proposed issuance of covered securities, unless the offering qualifies
for an exemption under that part.
(c) Securities requirements. To be included in supplementary
capital, covered securities must meet the following requirements:
(1) Form. (i) Each certificate evidencing a covered security must:
(A) Bear the following legend on its face, in bold type: ``This
security is not a savings account or deposit and it is not insured by
the United States or any agency or fund of the United States;''
(B) State that the security is subordinated on liquidation, as to
principal, interest, and premium, to all claims against the savings
association that have the same priority as savings accounts or a higher
priority;
(C) State that the security is not secured by the savings
association's assets or the assets of any affiliate of the savings
association, as defined in 12 CFR 583.2;
(D) State that the security is not eligible collateral for a loan
by the savings association;
(E) State the prohibition on the payment of dividends or interest
at 12 U.S.C. 1828(b) and, in the case of subordinated debt securities,
state the prohibition on the payment of principal and interest at 12
U.S.C. 1831o(h);
(F) For subordinated debt securities, state or refer to a document
stating the terms under which the savings association may prepay the
obligation; and
(G) State or refer to a document stating that the savings
association must obtain OTS approval before the voluntarily prepayment
of principal on subordinated debt securities, the acceleration of
payment of principal on subordinated debt securities, or the
voluntarily redemption of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock (other
than scheduled redemptions), if the savings association is
undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically
undercapitalized as described in Sec. 565.4(b) of this chapter, fails
to meet the regulatory capital requirements at 12 CFR part 567, or
would fail to meet any of these standards following the payment.
(ii) A savings association must include such additional statements
as OTS may prescribe for certificates, purchase agreements, indentures,
and other related documents. OTS will prescribe the text of these
additional statements in its Application Processing Handbook.
(2) Maturity requirements. Covered securities must have an original
weighted average maturity or original weighted average period to
required redemption of at least five years.
(3) Mandatory prepayment. Subordinated debt securities and related
documents may not provide events of default or contain other provisions
that could result in a mandatory prepayment of principal, other than
events of default that:
(i) Arise from the savings association's failure to make timely
payment of interest or principal;
(ii) Arise from its failure to comply with reasonable financial,
operating, and maintenance covenants of a type that are customarily
included in indentures for publicly offered debt securities; or
(iii) Relate to bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership, or similar
events.
(4) Indenture. A savings association must use an indenture for
subordinated debt securities. If the aggregate amount of subordinated
debt securities that are publicly offered (excluding sales in a non-
public offering as defined in 12 CFR 563g.4) and sold in any
consecutive 12-month or 36-month period exceeds $5,000,000 or
$10,000,000 respectively (or such lesser amount that the Securities and
Exchange Commission shall establish by rule or regulation under 15
U.S.C. 77ddd), the indenture must provide for:
(i) The appointment of a trustee other than the savings association
or an affiliate of the savings association (as defined at 12 CFR
583.2); and
(ii) Collective enforcement of the security holders' rights and
remedies.
(d) OTS review. (1) OTS will review notices and applications under
12 CFR part 516, subpart E.
(2) In reviewing notices and applications under this section, OTS
will consider whether:
(i) The issuance of the covered securities is authorized under
applicable laws and regulations and is consistent with the savings
association's charter and bylaws.
(ii) The savings association is at least adequately capitalized
under Sec. 565.4(b) of this chapter and meets the regulatory capital
requirements at Sec. 567.2 of this chapter.
(iii) The savings association is or will be able to service the
covered securities.
(iv) The covered securities are consistent with the requirements of
this section.
(v) The covered securities and related transactions sufficiently
transfer risk from the Deposit Insurance Fund.
(vi) OTS has no objection to the issuance based on the savings
association's overall policies, condition, and operations.
(3) OTS approval or nonobjection is conditioned upon no material
changes to the information disclosed in the application or notice
submitted to OTS. OTS may impose such additional requirements or
conditions as it may deem necessary to protect purchasers, the savings
association, OTS, or the Deposit Insurance Fund.
(e) Amendments. If a savings association amends the covered
securities or related documents following the completion of OTS review,
it must obtain OTS approval or nonobjection under this section before
it may include the amended securities in supplementary capital.
(f) Sale of covered securities. The savings association must
complete the sale of covered securities within one year after OTS
approval or nonobjection under this section. A savings association may
request an extension of the offering period by filing a written request
with OTS. The savings association must demonstrate good cause for the
extension and file the request at least 30 days before the expiration
of the offering period or any extension of the offering period.
(g) Reports. A savings association must file the following
information with OTS within 30 days after the savings association
completes the sale of covered securities includable as supplementary
capital. If the savings association filed its application or notice
following the completion of the sale, it must submit this information
with its application or notice:
(1) A written report indicating the number of purchasers, the total
dollar amount of securities sold, the net proceeds received by the
savings association from the issuance, and the amount of covered
securities, net of all expenses, to be included as supplementary
capital;
(2) Three copies of an executed form of the securities and a copy
of any related documents governing the issuance or administration of
the securities; and
[[Page 37868]]
(3) A certification by the appropriate executive officer indicating
that the savings association complied with all applicable laws and
regulations in connection with the offering, issuance, and sale of the
securities.
Dated: June 26, 2006.
By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
John M. Reich,
Director.
[FR Doc. E6-10341 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P