Office of Community Oriented Policing Services; Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested, 37607 [E6-10279]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 126 / Friday, June 30, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Community Oriented Policing
Services; Agency Information
Collection Activities: Proposed
Collection; Comments Requested
60-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: Monitoring
Information Collections.
ACTION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_1
The Department of Justice (DOJ)
Office of Community Oriented Policing
Services (COPS), has submitted the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed
information collection is published to
obtain comments from the public and
affected agencies.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for 60 days for public comment until
August 29, 2006. This process is
conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Rebekah Dorr,
Department of Justice Office of
Community Oriented Policing Services,
1100 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Jun 29, 2006
Jkt 208001
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Proposed collection; comments
requested.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Monitoring Information Collections.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
None. U.S. Department of Justice Office
of Community Oriented Policing
Services.
Affected public who will be asked or
required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: COPS Office hiring grantees
that are selected for in-depth monitoring
of their grant implementation and
equipment grantees that report using
COPS funds to implement a criminal
intelligence system will be required to
respond. The Monitoring Information
Collections include two types of
information collections: the Monitoring
Request for Documentation and the 28
CFR part 23 Monitoring Kit.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond/reply: It is estimated that 140
respondents annually will complete the
collections: 40 respondents to the
Monitoring Request for Documentation
at 3 hours per respondent; 100
respondents to the 28 CFR part 23
Monitoring Kit at 2 hours per response.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are an estimated 320
total annual burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Lynn Bryant, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building,
Suite 1600, 601 D Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: June 26, 2006.
Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA,
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. E6–10279 Filed 6–29–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–AT–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 03–39]
D & S Sales, Revocation of
Registration; Introduction and
Procedural History
On June 30, 2003, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37607
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), issued an Order
to Show Cause proposing to revoke
Respondent D & S Sales’ DEA
Certification of Registration,
003884DSY, as a distributor of List I
chemicals, and to deny any pending
applications for renewal or modification
of that registration under 21 U.S.C.
824(a) (4) and 823(h). The Show Cause
Order alleged that the continuation of
Respondent’s registration would be
inconsistent with the public interest as
that term is defined in 21 U.S.C. 823(h).
Specifically, the Show Cause Order
alleged that Respondent’s ‘‘product mix
and sales of combination ephedrine
products are inconsistent with the
known legitimate market and known
end user demand for products of this
type,’’ that D & S’s owner, Mr. Dean
Call, knew ‘‘that his ephedrine sales are
not for legitimate uses,’’ ALJ Exh. 1, at
6, and that the ephedrine products he
distributed were being purchased for
use in the illicit manufacture of
methamphetamine.
Respondent requested a hearing. The
matter was assigned to Administrative
Law Judge Gail Randall, who conducted
a hearing in Fort Wayne, Indiana, on
June 15, 2004. Following the hearing,
the Government filed Proposed Findings
of Fact, Conclusions of Law and
Argument, and Respondent filed its
Proposed Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law.
On February 11, 2005, the ALJ
submitted her decision. The ALJ
concluded that the Government had
proved that the continuation of
Respondent’s registration would be
inconsistent with the public interest.
See ALJ at 35. The ALJ further
recommended that Respondent’s
registration be revoked and that its
pending application for renewal of its
registration be denied. See id. at 36.
Thereafter, the Government filed
exceptions on the ground that the ALJ
had erred in holding that the statistical
evidence it introduced through its
expert witness did not provide
‘‘conclusive evidence of diversion or
fault on the part of Respondent.’’
Government’s Exceptions to the
Recommended Findings of Fact,
Conclusions of Law, and Decision of the
ALJ, at 2 (quoting ALJ Dec. at 33).
Having considered the record as a
whole, I hereby issue this decision and
final order adopting the ALJ’s findings
of fact and conclusions of law except as
expressly rejected herein. I further grant
the Government’s exception and hold
that the Government has established by
a preponderance of the evidence that
diversion occurred. For the reasons set
forth below, I concur with the ALJ’s
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 126 (Friday, June 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 37607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10279]
[[Page 37607]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services; Agency
Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments
Requested
ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review:
Monitoring Information Collections.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Community Oriented
Policing Services (COPS), has submitted the following information
collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain
comments from the public and affected agencies.
The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days for public
comment until August 29, 2006. This process is conducted in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with instructions or additional
information, please contact Rebekah Dorr, Department of Justice Office
of Community Oriented Policing Services, 1100 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following
four points:
--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
--Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Overview of This Information Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection: Proposed collection; comments
requested.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: Monitoring Information
Collections.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection: None. U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well
as a brief abstract:
Primary: COPS Office hiring grantees that are selected for in-depth
monitoring of their grant implementation and equipment grantees that
report using COPS funds to implement a criminal intelligence system
will be required to respond. The Monitoring Information Collections
include two types of information collections: the Monitoring Request
for Documentation and the 28 CFR part 23 Monitoring Kit.
(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond/reply: It is
estimated that 140 respondents annually will complete the collections:
40 respondents to the Monitoring Request for Documentation at 3 hours
per respondent; 100 respondents to the 28 CFR part 23 Monitoring Kit at
2 hours per response.
(6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: There are an estimated 320 total annual burden
hours associated with this collection.
If additional information is required contact: Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice,
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry
Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street NW., Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: June 26, 2006.
Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA, Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. E6-10279 Filed 6-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-AT-P
