Organization and Operations of Federal Credit Unions, 36667-36671 [E6-10134]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
provide a written determination within
the 45-day period the request is deemed
denied. A credit union may appeal any
part of the determination to the NCUA
Board. Appeals must be submitted
through the regional director within 30
days of the date of the determination.
(4) For purposes of paragraph (h) of
this section:
(i) The term ‘‘third-party servicer’’
means any entity, other than a federallyinsured depository institution or a
wholly-owned subsidiary of a federallyinsured depository institution, that
receives any scheduled, periodic
payments from a borrower pursuant to
the terms of a loan and distributes
payments of principal and interest and
any other payments with respect to the
amounts received from the borrower as
may be required pursuant to the terms
of the loan. The term also excludes any
servicing entity that meets the following
three requirements:
(A) Has a majority of its voting
interests owned by federally-insured
credit unions;
(B) Includes in its servicing
agreements with credit unions a
provision that the servicer will provide
NCUA with complete access to its books
and records and the ability to review its
internal controls as deemed necessary
by NCUA in carrying out NCUA’s
responsibilities under the Act; and
(C) Has its credit union clients
provide a copy of the servicing
agreement to their regional directors.
(ii) The term ‘‘its affiliates,’’ as it
relates to the third-party servicer, means
any entities that:
(A) Control, are controlled by, or are
under common control with, that thirdparty servicer; or
(B) Are under contract with that thirdparty servicer or other entity described
in paragraph (h)(4)(ii)(A) of this section.
(iii) The term ‘‘vehicle loan’’ means
any installment vehicle sales contract or
its equivalent that is reported as an asset
under generally accepted accounting
principles. The term does not include:
(A) Loans made directly by a credit
union to a member, or
(B) Loans in which neither the thirdparty servicer nor any of its affiliates are
involved in the origination,
underwriting, or insuring of the loan or
the process by which the credit union
acquires its interest in the loan.
(iv) The term ‘‘net worth’’ means the
retained earnings balance of the credit
union at quarter end as determined
under generally accepted accounting
principles. For low income-designated
credit unions, net worth also includes
secondary capital accounts that are
uninsured and subordinate to all other
claims, including claims of creditors,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:04 Jun 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
shareholders, and the National Credit
Union Share Insurance Fund.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 741—REQUIREMENTS FOR
INSURANCE
3. The authority citation for part 741
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1757, 1766, 1781–
1790, and 1790d. Section 741.4 is also
authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3717.
4. Add a new paragraph (c) to
§ 741.203 to read as follows:
I
§ 741.203 Minimum loan policy
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Adhere to the requirements stated
in § 701.21(h) of this chapter concerning
third-party servicing of indirect vehicle
loans. Before a state-chartered credit
union applies to a regional director for
a waiver under § 701.21(h)(2), it must
first notify its state supervisory
authority. The regional director will not
grant a waiver unless the appropriate
state official concurs in the waiver. The
45-day period for the regional director
to act on a waiver request, as described
§ 701.21(h)(3), will not begin until the
regional director has received the state
official’s concurrence and any other
necessary information.
[FR Doc. E6–10137 Filed 6–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 701
Organization and Operations of
Federal Credit Unions
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NCUA is amending its field of
membership rules regarding service to
underserved areas to limit underserved
area additions to multiple commonbond credit unions and revise facility
requirements for underserved areas.
These amendments are being made after
a comprehensive review of chartering
policy based upon NCUA’s experience
addressing field of membership issues
and the uncertainty resulting from
recent litigation challenging service to
underserved areas in Utah and the
current ambiguity in the Federal Credit
Union Act on this issue. This final rule
will ensure continued reliable and
efficient service to federal credit union
members located in approved
underserved areas and continue to allow
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36667
multiple common-bond credit unions to
add underserved areas to their charters.
The final rule generally adopts the
amendments as proposed. In addition,
the final rule retains the definition of
service facility as a credit union owned
facility where shares are accepted for
members’ accounts, loan applications
are accepted, and loans are disbursed.
DATES: Effective July 28, 2006
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael J. McKenna, Deputy General
Counsel, John K. Ianno, Senior Trial
Attorney, or Regina Metz, Staff
Attorney, Office of General Counsel,
1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia
22314 or telephone (703) 518–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
NCUA’s chartering and field of
membership policy is set out in NCUA’s
Chartering and Field of Membership
Manual (Chartering Manual),
Interpretive Ruling and Policy
Statement 03–1. 68 FR 18333, Apr. 15,
2003. The policy is incorporated by
reference in NCUA’s regulations at 12
CFR 701.1. On December 29, 2005, the
NCUA Board issued a moratorium
suspending that portion of its chartering
policy allowing non-multiple-commonbond credit unions to add new
underserved areas. After establishing a
moratorium, the NCUA conducted a
comprehensive review of its
underserved area policy.
On January 19, 2006, the NCUA Board
approved a proposed rule regarding
service to underserved areas. 71 FR
4530, Jan. 27, 2006. The NCUA
proposed two amendments that would
apply only prospectively. The first
proposed change was to limit the
addition of new underserved areas to
only multiple common-bond credit
unions. The second proposed change
was to the definition and location of the
service facility. When adding
underserved areas, NCUA proposed
requiring a physical presence in the
underserved areas to assure better
service to members in these locations
and deleting the choice of a credit union
owned electronic facility with certain
functions as a service facility.
B. Comments
NCUA welcomed general comments
on the proposed rule and also on all
aspects of NCUA’s rules on credit
unions serving underserved areas. In
addition to seeking general comments
on the proposed rule, the Board
specifically sought comments on a
series of questions related to the impact
of the proposed changes on consumers
and credit unions. The comments were
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
36668
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
intended to assist the Board in
understanding what, if any, impact the
proposed changes would have on credit
unions that have expended resources
investing in underserved areas. The
Board is concerned that there is both
financial and reputation risk if credit
unions, previously authorized to operate
in underserved areas, are prohibited
from continuing to do so. The Board is
also concerned that the proposed
changes could limit the ability of credit
unions to grow and expand services into
underserved areas and provide needed
financial assistance to consumers of
modest means who do not currently
have access to low cost financial
services and undermine the viability of
the federal credit union charter.
NCUA received 49 comment letters in
response to the proposed rule: 31 from
federal credit unions, one from a statechartered credit union, 12 from credit
union trade organizations, three from
bank trade organizations, one from an
individual, and one from an institute.
Most credit union commenters opposed
the proposal and support the status quo.
One commenter believes the proposal
contradicts congressional intent by only
allowing multiple common-bond credit
unions to add underserved areas. In
contrast, some credit union commenters
appreciated NCUA’s concerns and
supported the proposal. Whether
opposed to or in favor of the proposal,
most credit union commenters support
a legislative solution amending the
Federal Credit Union Act to expressly
state that all federal credit unions may
add underserved areas. Bank trade
group commenters generally supported
the proposal and, in some cases,
recommended further requirements for
credit unions serving underserved areas.
The NCUA Board asked for specific
comments on the following five
questions.
(1) NCUA’s authority to permit
expansions into underserved areas for
all three federal charter types.
With the exception of the bank trade
groups, almost all commenters
expressed the opinion that NCUA has
the authority to allow all three charter
types to add underserved areas. Six
commenters support the continuation of
the moratorium and understand the
basis for NCUA’s proposal in this area
given the current litigation. Almost all
credit union commenters suggest that
NCUA seek a statutory change to the
Federal Credit Union Act in order to
insert express language authorizing this
activity.
Credit unions are leaders among
financial institutions in providing
affordable financial services to persons
within their specific field of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:04 Jun 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
membership, including people of
modest means. The Board is committed
to assuring that credit unions have the
regulatory tools necessary to perform
this important role. One of the primary
purposes of the Credit Union
Membership Access Act (CUMAA) was
to codify the legality of multiple
common-bond credit unions. CUMAA
also reflects Congress’ intent to clarify
that this new charter type was
authorized to add underserved areas.
Unfortunately, the statutory language
does not expressly provide that
authority to the other two charter types
although there is legislative history that
indicates Congress intended that all
types of federal credit unions should be
able to add underserved areas. This
absence of specific statutory language,
when considered together with the
specific authorization for multiple
common-bond credit unions, creates
uncertainty about the continued
authority of non-multiple common-bond
credit unions to serve underserved
areas. Though most commenters argued
that the Board has the authority to
authorize the other charter types to
serve underserved areas, they provided
no persuasive argument to address the
issue created by the absence of any
specific statutory language. In addition,
recently the American Bankers
Association and others have filed
litigation challenging the authority of a
non-multiple common-bond credit
union to serve underserved areas in
Utah.
In light of this uncertainty, the Board
is amending its chartering policies to
allow only multiple common-bond
credit unions to serve underserved areas
pending clarification of the language
contained in the Federal Credit Union
Act that authorizes the addition of
underserved areas. The amendments to
the chartering policy will apply only
prospectively. The NCUA Board agrees
a statutory change is necessary.
(2) The impact of limiting expansions
into underserved areas to only multiple
common-bond credit unions.
Several credit union commenters
described the negative impact on both
credit unions and consumers of limiting
underserved expansions to multiple
common bond credit unions.
Commenters wrote that low-income
individuals and those who most need
credit union service will receive less
service. A couple of commenters wrote
that there will be less competition. One
commenter said there will be a negative
impact on the dual chartering system
and that some federal credit unions will
convert to state charters.
The Board agrees that restricting
further expansions has the potential to
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
limit the availability of credit union
services to some consumers.
Nevertheless, the Board has concluded
that there are many opportunities for
continued growth and expanded service
to consumers within existing fields of
membership, even with a change to
chartering policies limiting prospective
addition of underserved areas to
multiple common-bond credit unions.
The Board concludes that the ambiguity
arising from the statute as well as the
current litigation outweighs the
potential harm to credit unions and
potential members.
(3) Whether, if only multiple common
bond credit unions are permitted to add
underserved areas, they should be
permitted to retain these areas in the
event they change charter type.
Almost all credit union commenters
who commented on this issue support
permitting multiple common-bond
credit unions to retain their underserved
areas if they change charter types. The
banking trade group commenters oppose
credit unions retaining the areas.
Given that the final rule will not
permit non-multiple common-bond
credit unions to serve underserved
areas, the Board concludes that, upon
conversion to another charter type, the
restrictions applicable to the new
charter type must apply. Therefore, a
multiple common-bond credit union
converting to either a single commonbond or community charter would be
required to give up its underserved
areas. The credit union could continue
to serve its existing members. This
approach is faithful to the requirements
of this final rule which prospectively
permits only multiple common-bond
credit unions to serve underserved
areas. It is also consistent with the
approach taken when a multiple
common-bond credit union converts to
a community credit union. In those
circumstances, a credit union must
comply with the requirements of the
new charter type and relinquish its
select employee groups.
The Board is aware that certain
unpredictable factors, such as economic
downturns and plant closings, could
cause a multiple common-bond credit
union to convert its charter type. While
the loss of underserved areas in these
circumstances may seem harsh, the
Board concludes that the credit union
must balance the potential impact of the
loss with other factors relevant to a
decision on its charter type. Part of the
consideration regarding whether a
charter change makes good business
sense should necessarily include the
fact that, once a multiple common-bond
credit union changes its charter, it will
lose its underserved areas.
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(4) The type and extent of existing
investment by non-multiple common
bond credit unions in underserved areas
including for example, capital
investment, loans, share deposits, and
other programs targeting low income
people.
The Credit Union National
Association, a credit union trade group,
provided a comprehensive list of
investments by non-multiple commonbond credit unions in underserved
areas. Credit unions described
investments in branch offices and
ATMs, their involvement through loans,
deposit products, services, and
community involvement and charitable
services in underserved areas. This
information is discussed further in
connection with question 5 below.
(5) The impact to members of
underserved areas, and non-multiple
common-bond credit unions, of
restrictions on the addition of new
members in underserved areas they are
currently serving.
Almost all credit union commenters
on this question believe the restrictions
would have a negative impact. A few
credit unions wrote they might have to
close branches and would suffer
economic loss. Several credit unions
requested they be ‘‘grandfathered’’ so
that they can continue to add new
members from the underserved areas
they currently serve.
The information provided establishes
that many credit unions have invested
significant funds, totaling in excess of
400 million dollars, and other resources
into serving more than 800 underserved
areas. This investment includes the
establishment of hundreds of branches
in and near underserved areas. Activity
by credit unions in these areas indicates
the significance of their services to their
financial well being and the needs of
their membership. It includes billions of
dollars in loans and share deposits.
Generally, regulations are prospective
in nature. Bowen v. Georgetown
Hospital, 488 U.S. 204, 216 (1988)
(Scalia, J., concurring). In considering
the equities of applying a rule
retroactively courts will consider such
factors as the degree of hardship parties
would experience, whether reliance on
past regulation was justifiable and any
statutory interest in retroactive
application of the new rule. See, e.g.,
Consolidated Freightways v. N.L.R.B.,
892 F.2d 1052, 1058 (D.C. Cir. 1989)
citing Tennesee Gas Pipeline Co. v.
FERC, 606 F.2d 1094, 1115, 1116 n.77
(D.C. Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S.
920 (1980).
Application of these principles to this
rule demonstrate that the equities favor
prospective application.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:04 Jun 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
The comments received demonstrate
that there has been significant financial
investment by credit unions in reliance
on NCUA’s existing rule. These
investments were made with the
expectation that service would be
available to all potential members in the
underserved areas. Prohibiting the
addition of new members would limit
growth in these areas, expose the
institutions to significant hardship
through increased financial and
reputation risk, and could cause safety
and soundness concerns. Existing
members would also suffer as a result of
the diminished services that would
result if further membership growth was
prohibited.
It is also clear that reliance by credit
unions on NCUA’s regulation permitting
these expansions was justified. NCUA
has authorized all federal credit unions,
regardless of charter type, to add
underserved areas since 1994. Prior to
the passage of the CUMAA in 1998
these areas were referred to as
underserved communities.
With the passage of CUMAA, NCUA
made significant changes to its
chartering policies but again reiterated
that all charter types were permitted to
add underserved areas. In the preamble
to the regulatory changes implementing
CUMAA, the Board noted that the new
legislation specifically authorized
flexible policies regarding multiple
common-bond credit unions providing
service to underserved areas. At that
time we also encouraged all credit
unions to continue service to poor and
disadvantaged areas and indicated that
previous policy permitting all charter
types to serve underserved areas would
continue. IRPS 99–1, 63 FR 71998,
72016 (Dec. 30, 1998). Credit unions
reasonably relied on these policy
statements by this Board.
In short, investment by credit unions
in underserved areas has occurred in
reliance on long-standing NCUA
policies that authorized and indeed
encouraged such activity. Members in
underserved areas have benefited from
low cost financial services made
available as a result of these efforts.
They have become members in reliance
upon NCUA policy that authorized
credit union expansion into these areas.
Credit unions that have invested in
these areas have done so based on
economic assumptions that included
continued growth in membership. If
continued growth is no longer possible,
credit unions will be unable to sustain
the current level of services provided in
these areas. This could result in
diminished or lost services to existing
members.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36669
On balance therefore, the Board
concludes that the equities support only
prospective application of this rule.
Credit unions, regardless of charter type,
that were serving underserved areas at
the time the proposed rule was issued
should be permitted to continue to serve
those areas to include adding new
members. To require them to do
otherwise, given their reasonable
reliance on NCUA’s policy as well as
their substantial investments, would
cause substantial harm to the credit
unions, their members, and potential
members in the underserved area.
Regarding the service facility location,
many commenters opposed NCUA’s
proposal to require a physical presence
in the underserved area and recommend
keeping the status quo. Some opposing
commenters believe NCUA has the
authority to require a credit union to
locate a service facility in or near an
underserved area. Some commenters
believe the location of a branch is a
business decision for the credit union to
decide. Some commenters believe
NCUA should focus on the level of
service to the underserved area, not
whether the branch is within the area,
and one commenter noted that the
Community Reinvestment Act does not
require branches in an area and allows
banks to provide service via ATMs and
computers. Another commenter
supported a specified distance from the
underserved area to the service facility’s
location rather than requiring it to be in
the underserved area.
A commenter wrote that the service
facility should not have to be in an
underserved area within two years if
there is public transportation to the
service facility or is an acceptable
distance from the underserved area. The
same commenter suggested the
proposed definition of local community
should be revised to be 50 miles for
heavily populated urban areas and 200
miles for lightly populated rural areas.
The commenter believes common
interests and interaction should be
removed as they are no longer valid or
necessary due to credit reports.
Several commenters supported the
service facility requirement as proposed,
requiring a service facility be within the
underserved area. A couple of
commenters specifically mentioned that
a physical presence ensures a credit
union is serving the area.
A banking trade group commenter
wrote that NCUA should require credit
unions serving underserved areas to
establish a service facility in that area
within one year. Another banking trade
group wrote that NCUA should require
a credit union to establish the service
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
36670
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
facility in the area upon approval of the
expansion.
The NCUA Board finds that a service
facility physically located in the
underserved area assures better service
to members in these locations. A credit
union can build a better relationship
and understanding of the needs of the
community by having a physical
presence in the area. By doing so the
credit union will be better able to assess
the needs of the underserved area and
provide needed services to its members.
NCUA believes requiring establishment
of a service facility within two years of
the credit union’s addition of the area is
reasonable and is retaining it. In
addition, the Board has decided to
retain as an option for an acceptable
type of service facility within the
underserved area, a credit union owned
facility where shares are accepted for
member accounts, loan applications are
accepted, and loans are disbursed.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires NCUA to prepare an analysis to
describe any significant economic
impact a regulation may have on a
substantial number of small credit
unions (primarily those under $10
million in assets). The final
amendments will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small credit unions and
therefore, a regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Office of Management and Budget
control numbers assigned to Section
701.1 are 3133–0015 and 3133–0116.
NCUA has determined that the
amendments will not increase
paperwork requirements and a
paperwork reduction analysis is not
required.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on
state and local interests. In adherence to
fundamental federalism principles,
NCUA, an independent regulatory
agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5),
voluntarily complies with the executive
order. The final rule would not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the connection between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this rule does not
constitute a policy that has federalism
implications for purposes of the
executive order.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:04 Jun 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
The Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999—Assessment
of Federal Regulations and Policies on
Families
The NCUA has determined that this
rule would not affect family well-being
within the meaning of section 654 of the
Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act of 1999, Pub. L.
105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub.
L. 104–121) provides generally for
congressional review of agency rules. A
reporting requirement is triggered in
instances where NCUA issues a final
rule as defined by Section 551 of the
Administrative Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C.
551. NCUA is recommending the Office
of Management and Budget determined
that this rule is not a major rule for
purposes of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 701
Credit, Credit unions, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on June 22, 2006.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
the National Credit Union
Administration amends 12 CFR part 701
as follows:
I
PART 701—ORGANIZATION AND
OPERATION OF FEDERAL CREDIT
UNIONS
1. The authority citation for part 701
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1755, 1756,
1757, 1759, 1761a, 1761b, 1766, 1767, 1782,
1784, 1787, 1789. Section 701.6 is also
authorized by 15 U.S.C. 3717. Section 701.31
is also authorized by 15 U.S.C. 1601, et seq.,
42 U.S.C. 1981 and 3601–3610. Section
701.35 is also authorized by 12 U.S.C. 4311–
4312.
2. Section 701.1 is revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 701.1 Federal credit union chartering,
field of membership modifications, and
conversions.
National Credit Union Administration
policies concerning chartering, field of
membership modifications, and
conversions are set forth in Interpretive
Ruling and Policy Statement 03–1,
Chartering and Field of Membership
Manual, as amended by IRPS 06–1,
Copies may be obtained on NCUA’s
Web site, https://www.ncua.gov, or by
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
contacting NCUA at the address found
in Section 790.2(c) of this chapter.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 3133–0015 and
3133–0116.)
3. IRPS 03–1, Chapter 3, Section III.A
is revised to read as follows:
I
Note: The text of the IRPS 06–1 does not
appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.
A multiple common-bond federal
credit union may include in its field of
membership, without regard to location,
communities satisfying the definition of
underserved areas in the Federal Credit
Union Act. Adding an underserved area
will not change the charter type of the
multiple common-bond federal credit
union. More than one multiple
common-bond federal credit union can
serve the same underserved area. The
Federal Credit Union Act defines an
underserved area as a local community,
neighborhood, or rural district that is an
‘‘investment area’’ as defined in Section
103(16) of the Community Development
Banking and Financial Institutions Act
of 1994.
For an underserved area, the welldefined local community,
neighborhood, or rural district
requirement is met if:
• The area to be served is in a
recognized single political jurisdiction,
i.e., a city, county, or their political
equivalent, or any contiguous portion
thereof;
• The area to be served is in multiple
contiguous political jurisdictions, i.e. a
city, county, or their political
equivalent, or any contiguous portion
thereof and if the population of the
requested well-defined area does not
exceed 500,000; or
• The area to be served is a
Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or
its equivalent, or a portion thereof,
where the population of the MSA or its
equivalent does not exceed 1,000,000.
If the area to be served does not meet
the MSA or multiple political
jurisdiction requirements outlined
above, the application must include
documentation to support that it is a
well-defined local community,
neighborhood, or rural district.
For an underserved area, an
investment area includes any of the
following, as reported in the most
recently completed decennial census or
equivalent government data:
• An area that wholly consists of or
is wholly located within an
Empowerment Zone or Enterprise
Community designated under section
1391 of the Internal Revenue Code (26
U.S.C. 1391);
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
• An area where the percentage of the
population living in poverty is at least
20 percent;
• An area in a Metropolitan Area
where the median family income is at or
below 80 percent of the Metropolitan
Area median family income or the
national Metropolitan Area median
family income, whichever is greater;
• An area outside of a Metropolitan
Area, where the median family income
is at or below 80 percent of the
statewide non-Metropolitan Area
median family income or the national
non-Metropolitan Area median family
income, whichever is greater;
• An area where the unemployment
rate is at least 1.5 times the national
average;
• An area meeting the criteria for
economic distress that may be
established by the Community
Development Financial Institutions
Fund (CDFI) of the United States
Department of the Treasury.
In addition, the local community,
neighborhood, or rural district must be
underserved, based on data considered
by the NCUA Board and the Federal
banking agencies.
Once an underserved area is added to
a Federal credit union’s field of
membership, the credit union must
establish and maintain an office or
service facility in the community within
two years. A service facility is defined
as a place where shares are accepted for
members’ accounts, loan applications
are accepted and loans are disbursed.
This definition includes a credit union
owned branch, a shared branch, a
mobile branch, an office operated on a
regularly scheduled weekly basis, or a
credit union owned facility that meets,
at a minimum, these requirements. This
definition does not include an ATM or
the credit union’s Internet Web site.
The Federal credit union adding the
underserved community must
document that the community meets the
definition for serving underserved areas
in the Federal Credit Union Act. Adding
an underserved community does not
change the charter type of a multiple
common-bond federal credit union. In
order to receive the benefits afforded to
low-income designated credit unions,
such as expanded use of nonmember
deposits and access to the Community
Development Revolving Loan Program
for Credit Unions, a credit union must
receive low-income designation
pursuant to 12 CFR 701.34.
A Federal credit union that desires to
include an underserved community in
its field of membership must first
develop a business plan specifying how
it will serve the community. The
business plan, at a minimum, must
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:04 Jun 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
identify the credit and depository needs
of the community and detail how the
credit union plans to serve those needs.
The credit union will be expected to
review the business plan regularly to
determine if the community is being
adequately served. The regional director
may require periodic service status
reports from a credit union about the
underserved area to ensure that the
needs of the community are being met
as well as requiring such reports before
NCUA allows a multiple common-bond
Federal credit union to add an
additional underserved area.
[FR Doc. E6–10134 Filed 6–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25175; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–099–AD; Amendment
39–14670; AD 2006–13–17]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 757–200 Series Airplanes
Modified by Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC) SA979NE
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 757–200 series airplanes.
This AD requires a one-time
deactivation of the auxiliary fuel
system, repetitive venting and draining
of the auxiliary fuel tank sumps, and
revising the Limitations section of the
airplane flight manual to limit the
maximum cargo weight. This AD results
from a re-evaluation of the floor
structure and cargo barriers conducted
by the STC holder. We are issuing this
AD to prevent structural overload of the
auxiliary fuel tank support structure,
which could cause the floor beams to
fail, damaging the primary flight
controls and the auxiliary power unit
fuel lines that pass through the floor
beams, resulting in loss of control of the
airplane. We are also issuing this AD to
prevent structural overload of the cargo
barriers, which could cause the barriers
to fail, allowing the cargo to shift,
resulting in damage to the auxiliary fuel
tanks, residual fuel leakage, and
consequent increased risk of a fire.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36671
This AD becomes effective July
13, 2006.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of July 13, 2006.
We must receive comments on this
AD by August 28, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact PATS Aircraft, LLC, Product
Support, 21652 Nanticoke Avenue,
Georgetown, DE 19947, for service
information identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon
Hjelm, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
and Propulsion Branch, ANE–171, FAA,
New York Aircraft Certification Office,
1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone
(516) 228–7323; fax (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Discussion
PATS Aircraft (holder of
Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
SA979NE) notified us that it has
determined that Model 757–200 series
airplanes equipped with auxiliary fuel
tank systems installed by STC SA979NE
have insufficient structural strength in
the auxiliary fuel tank support structure.
The STC holder has also determined
that the cargo barriers have insufficient
structural strength if subjected to
emergency landing loads with more
than 2,000 pounds of cargo in the cargo
compartment. These determinations
were based on a new structural analysis
resulting from a re-evaluation of the
floor structure and cargo barriers
conducted by the STC holder. Structural
overload of the auxiliary fuel tank
support structure could cause the floor
beams to fail, damaging the primary
flight controls and the auxiliary power
unit fuel lines that pass through the
floor beams; this condition, if not
corrected, could result in loss of control
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 28, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36667-36671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10134]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 701
Organization and Operations of Federal Credit Unions
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NCUA is amending its field of membership rules regarding
service to underserved areas to limit underserved area additions to
multiple common-bond credit unions and revise facility requirements for
underserved areas. These amendments are being made after a
comprehensive review of chartering policy based upon NCUA's experience
addressing field of membership issues and the uncertainty resulting
from recent litigation challenging service to underserved areas in Utah
and the current ambiguity in the Federal Credit Union Act on this
issue. This final rule will ensure continued reliable and efficient
service to federal credit union members located in approved underserved
areas and continue to allow multiple common-bond credit unions to add
underserved areas to their charters. The final rule generally adopts
the amendments as proposed. In addition, the final rule retains the
definition of service facility as a credit union owned facility where
shares are accepted for members' accounts, loan applications are
accepted, and loans are disbursed.
DATES: Effective July 28, 2006
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. McKenna, Deputy General
Counsel, John K. Ianno, Senior Trial Attorney, or Regina Metz, Staff
Attorney, Office of General Counsel, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314 or telephone (703) 518-6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
NCUA's chartering and field of membership policy is set out in
NCUA's Chartering and Field of Membership Manual (Chartering Manual),
Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement 03-1. 68 FR 18333, Apr. 15,
2003. The policy is incorporated by reference in NCUA's regulations at
12 CFR 701.1. On December 29, 2005, the NCUA Board issued a moratorium
suspending that portion of its chartering policy allowing non-multiple-
common-bond credit unions to add new underserved areas. After
establishing a moratorium, the NCUA conducted a comprehensive review of
its underserved area policy.
On January 19, 2006, the NCUA Board approved a proposed rule
regarding service to underserved areas. 71 FR 4530, Jan. 27, 2006. The
NCUA proposed two amendments that would apply only prospectively. The
first proposed change was to limit the addition of new underserved
areas to only multiple common-bond credit unions. The second proposed
change was to the definition and location of the service facility. When
adding underserved areas, NCUA proposed requiring a physical presence
in the underserved areas to assure better service to members in these
locations and deleting the choice of a credit union owned electronic
facility with certain functions as a service facility.
B. Comments
NCUA welcomed general comments on the proposed rule and also on all
aspects of NCUA's rules on credit unions serving underserved areas. In
addition to seeking general comments on the proposed rule, the Board
specifically sought comments on a series of questions related to the
impact of the proposed changes on consumers and credit unions. The
comments were
[[Page 36668]]
intended to assist the Board in understanding what, if any, impact the
proposed changes would have on credit unions that have expended
resources investing in underserved areas. The Board is concerned that
there is both financial and reputation risk if credit unions,
previously authorized to operate in underserved areas, are prohibited
from continuing to do so. The Board is also concerned that the proposed
changes could limit the ability of credit unions to grow and expand
services into underserved areas and provide needed financial assistance
to consumers of modest means who do not currently have access to low
cost financial services and undermine the viability of the federal
credit union charter.
NCUA received 49 comment letters in response to the proposed rule:
31 from federal credit unions, one from a state-chartered credit union,
12 from credit union trade organizations, three from bank trade
organizations, one from an individual, and one from an institute. Most
credit union commenters opposed the proposal and support the status
quo. One commenter believes the proposal contradicts congressional
intent by only allowing multiple common-bond credit unions to add
underserved areas. In contrast, some credit union commenters
appreciated NCUA's concerns and supported the proposal. Whether opposed
to or in favor of the proposal, most credit union commenters support a
legislative solution amending the Federal Credit Union Act to expressly
state that all federal credit unions may add underserved areas. Bank
trade group commenters generally supported the proposal and, in some
cases, recommended further requirements for credit unions serving
underserved areas.
The NCUA Board asked for specific comments on the following five
questions.
(1) NCUA's authority to permit expansions into underserved areas
for all three federal charter types.
With the exception of the bank trade groups, almost all commenters
expressed the opinion that NCUA has the authority to allow all three
charter types to add underserved areas. Six commenters support the
continuation of the moratorium and understand the basis for NCUA's
proposal in this area given the current litigation. Almost all credit
union commenters suggest that NCUA seek a statutory change to the
Federal Credit Union Act in order to insert express language
authorizing this activity.
Credit unions are leaders among financial institutions in providing
affordable financial services to persons within their specific field of
membership, including people of modest means. The Board is committed to
assuring that credit unions have the regulatory tools necessary to
perform this important role. One of the primary purposes of the Credit
Union Membership Access Act (CUMAA) was to codify the legality of
multiple common-bond credit unions. CUMAA also reflects Congress'
intent to clarify that this new charter type was authorized to add
underserved areas. Unfortunately, the statutory language does not
expressly provide that authority to the other two charter types
although there is legislative history that indicates Congress intended
that all types of federal credit unions should be able to add
underserved areas. This absence of specific statutory language, when
considered together with the specific authorization for multiple
common-bond credit unions, creates uncertainty about the continued
authority of non-multiple common-bond credit unions to serve
underserved areas. Though most commenters argued that the Board has the
authority to authorize the other charter types to serve underserved
areas, they provided no persuasive argument to address the issue
created by the absence of any specific statutory language. In addition,
recently the American Bankers Association and others have filed
litigation challenging the authority of a non-multiple common-bond
credit union to serve underserved areas in Utah.
In light of this uncertainty, the Board is amending its chartering
policies to allow only multiple common-bond credit unions to serve
underserved areas pending clarification of the language contained in
the Federal Credit Union Act that authorizes the addition of
underserved areas. The amendments to the chartering policy will apply
only prospectively. The NCUA Board agrees a statutory change is
necessary.
(2) The impact of limiting expansions into underserved areas to
only multiple common-bond credit unions.
Several credit union commenters described the negative impact on
both credit unions and consumers of limiting underserved expansions to
multiple common bond credit unions. Commenters wrote that low-income
individuals and those who most need credit union service will receive
less service. A couple of commenters wrote that there will be less
competition. One commenter said there will be a negative impact on the
dual chartering system and that some federal credit unions will convert
to state charters.
The Board agrees that restricting further expansions has the
potential to limit the availability of credit union services to some
consumers. Nevertheless, the Board has concluded that there are many
opportunities for continued growth and expanded service to consumers
within existing fields of membership, even with a change to chartering
policies limiting prospective addition of underserved areas to multiple
common-bond credit unions. The Board concludes that the ambiguity
arising from the statute as well as the current litigation outweighs
the potential harm to credit unions and potential members.
(3) Whether, if only multiple common bond credit unions are
permitted to add underserved areas, they should be permitted to retain
these areas in the event they change charter type.
Almost all credit union commenters who commented on this issue
support permitting multiple common-bond credit unions to retain their
underserved areas if they change charter types. The banking trade group
commenters oppose credit unions retaining the areas.
Given that the final rule will not permit non-multiple common-bond
credit unions to serve underserved areas, the Board concludes that,
upon conversion to another charter type, the restrictions applicable to
the new charter type must apply. Therefore, a multiple common-bond
credit union converting to either a single common-bond or community
charter would be required to give up its underserved areas. The credit
union could continue to serve its existing members. This approach is
faithful to the requirements of this final rule which prospectively
permits only multiple common-bond credit unions to serve underserved
areas. It is also consistent with the approach taken when a multiple
common-bond credit union converts to a community credit union. In those
circumstances, a credit union must comply with the requirements of the
new charter type and relinquish its select employee groups.
The Board is aware that certain unpredictable factors, such as
economic downturns and plant closings, could cause a multiple common-
bond credit union to convert its charter type. While the loss of
underserved areas in these circumstances may seem harsh, the Board
concludes that the credit union must balance the potential impact of
the loss with other factors relevant to a decision on its charter type.
Part of the consideration regarding whether a charter change makes good
business sense should necessarily include the fact that, once a
multiple common-bond credit union changes its charter, it will lose its
underserved areas.
[[Page 36669]]
(4) The type and extent of existing investment by non-multiple
common bond credit unions in underserved areas including for example,
capital investment, loans, share deposits, and other programs targeting
low income people.
The Credit Union National Association, a credit union trade group,
provided a comprehensive list of investments by non-multiple common-
bond credit unions in underserved areas. Credit unions described
investments in branch offices and ATMs, their involvement through
loans, deposit products, services, and community involvement and
charitable services in underserved areas. This information is discussed
further in connection with question 5 below.
(5) The impact to members of underserved areas, and non-multiple
common-bond credit unions, of restrictions on the addition of new
members in underserved areas they are currently serving.
Almost all credit union commenters on this question believe the
restrictions would have a negative impact. A few credit unions wrote
they might have to close branches and would suffer economic loss.
Several credit unions requested they be ``grandfathered'' so that they
can continue to add new members from the underserved areas they
currently serve.
The information provided establishes that many credit unions have
invested significant funds, totaling in excess of 400 million dollars,
and other resources into serving more than 800 underserved areas. This
investment includes the establishment of hundreds of branches in and
near underserved areas. Activity by credit unions in these areas
indicates the significance of their services to their financial well
being and the needs of their membership. It includes billions of
dollars in loans and share deposits.
Generally, regulations are prospective in nature. Bowen v.
Georgetown Hospital, 488 U.S. 204, 216 (1988) (Scalia, J., concurring).
In considering the equities of applying a rule retroactively courts
will consider such factors as the degree of hardship parties would
experience, whether reliance on past regulation was justifiable and any
statutory interest in retroactive application of the new rule. See,
e.g., Consolidated Freightways v. N.L.R.B., 892 F.2d 1052, 1058 (D.C.
Cir. 1989) citing Tennesee Gas Pipeline Co. v. FERC, 606 F.2d 1094,
1115, 1116 n.77 (D.C. Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 920 (1980).
Application of these principles to this rule demonstrate that the
equities favor prospective application.
The comments received demonstrate that there has been significant
financial investment by credit unions in reliance on NCUA's existing
rule. These investments were made with the expectation that service
would be available to all potential members in the underserved areas.
Prohibiting the addition of new members would limit growth in these
areas, expose the institutions to significant hardship through
increased financial and reputation risk, and could cause safety and
soundness concerns. Existing members would also suffer as a result of
the diminished services that would result if further membership growth
was prohibited.
It is also clear that reliance by credit unions on NCUA's
regulation permitting these expansions was justified. NCUA has
authorized all federal credit unions, regardless of charter type, to
add underserved areas since 1994. Prior to the passage of the CUMAA in
1998 these areas were referred to as underserved communities.
With the passage of CUMAA, NCUA made significant changes to its
chartering policies but again reiterated that all charter types were
permitted to add underserved areas. In the preamble to the regulatory
changes implementing CUMAA, the Board noted that the new legislation
specifically authorized flexible policies regarding multiple common-
bond credit unions providing service to underserved areas. At that time
we also encouraged all credit unions to continue service to poor and
disadvantaged areas and indicated that previous policy permitting all
charter types to serve underserved areas would continue. IRPS 99-1, 63
FR 71998, 72016 (Dec. 30, 1998). Credit unions reasonably relied on
these policy statements by this Board.
In short, investment by credit unions in underserved areas has
occurred in reliance on long-standing NCUA policies that authorized and
indeed encouraged such activity. Members in underserved areas have
benefited from low cost financial services made available as a result
of these efforts. They have become members in reliance upon NCUA policy
that authorized credit union expansion into these areas. Credit unions
that have invested in these areas have done so based on economic
assumptions that included continued growth in membership. If continued
growth is no longer possible, credit unions will be unable to sustain
the current level of services provided in these areas. This could
result in diminished or lost services to existing members.
On balance therefore, the Board concludes that the equities support
only prospective application of this rule. Credit unions, regardless of
charter type, that were serving underserved areas at the time the
proposed rule was issued should be permitted to continue to serve those
areas to include adding new members. To require them to do otherwise,
given their reasonable reliance on NCUA's policy as well as their
substantial investments, would cause substantial harm to the credit
unions, their members, and potential members in the underserved area.
Regarding the service facility location, many commenters opposed
NCUA's proposal to require a physical presence in the underserved area
and recommend keeping the status quo. Some opposing commenters believe
NCUA has the authority to require a credit union to locate a service
facility in or near an underserved area. Some commenters believe the
location of a branch is a business decision for the credit union to
decide. Some commenters believe NCUA should focus on the level of
service to the underserved area, not whether the branch is within the
area, and one commenter noted that the Community Reinvestment Act does
not require branches in an area and allows banks to provide service via
ATMs and computers. Another commenter supported a specified distance
from the underserved area to the service facility's location rather
than requiring it to be in the underserved area.
A commenter wrote that the service facility should not have to be
in an underserved area within two years if there is public
transportation to the service facility or is an acceptable distance
from the underserved area. The same commenter suggested the proposed
definition of local community should be revised to be 50 miles for
heavily populated urban areas and 200 miles for lightly populated rural
areas. The commenter believes common interests and interaction should
be removed as they are no longer valid or necessary due to credit
reports.
Several commenters supported the service facility requirement as
proposed, requiring a service facility be within the underserved area.
A couple of commenters specifically mentioned that a physical presence
ensures a credit union is serving the area.
A banking trade group commenter wrote that NCUA should require
credit unions serving underserved areas to establish a service facility
in that area within one year. Another banking trade group wrote that
NCUA should require a credit union to establish the service
[[Page 36670]]
facility in the area upon approval of the expansion.
The NCUA Board finds that a service facility physically located in
the underserved area assures better service to members in these
locations. A credit union can build a better relationship and
understanding of the needs of the community by having a physical
presence in the area. By doing so the credit union will be better able
to assess the needs of the underserved area and provide needed services
to its members. NCUA believes requiring establishment of a service
facility within two years of the credit union's addition of the area is
reasonable and is retaining it. In addition, the Board has decided to
retain as an option for an acceptable type of service facility within
the underserved area, a credit union owned facility where shares are
accepted for member accounts, loan applications are accepted, and loans
are disbursed.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires NCUA to prepare an analysis
to describe any significant economic impact a regulation may have on a
substantial number of small credit unions (primarily those under $10
million in assets). The final amendments will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small credit unions and
therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Office of Management and Budget control numbers assigned to
Section 701.1 are 3133-0015 and 3133-0116. NCUA has determined that the
amendments will not increase paperwork requirements and a paperwork
reduction analysis is not required.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on state and local interests. In
adherence to fundamental federalism principles, NCUA, an independent
regulatory agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5), voluntarily complies
with the executive order. The final rule would not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the connection between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this rule does not constitute a policy that has
federalism implications for purposes of the executive order.
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999--
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
The NCUA has determined that this rule would not affect family
well-being within the meaning of section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations Act of 1999, Pub. L. 105-277, 112
Stat. 2681 (1998).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(Pub. L. 104-121) provides generally for congressional review of agency
rules. A reporting requirement is triggered in instances where NCUA
issues a final rule as defined by Section 551 of the Administrative
Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. 551. NCUA is recommending the Office of
Management and Budget determined that this rule is not a major rule for
purposes of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 701
Credit, Credit unions, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
By the National Credit Union Administration Board on June 22,
2006.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the National Credit Union
Administration amends 12 CFR part 701 as follows:
PART 701--ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION OF FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 701 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1755, 1756, 1757, 1759, 1761a,
1761b, 1766, 1767, 1782, 1784, 1787, 1789. Section 701.6 is also
authorized by 15 U.S.C. 3717. Section 701.31 is also authorized by
15 U.S.C. 1601, et seq., 42 U.S.C. 1981 and 3601-3610. Section
701.35 is also authorized by 12 U.S.C. 4311-4312.
0
2. Section 701.1 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 701.1 Federal credit union chartering, field of membership
modifications, and conversions.
National Credit Union Administration policies concerning
chartering, field of membership modifications, and conversions are set
forth in Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement 03-1, Chartering and
Field of Membership Manual, as amended by IRPS 06-1, Copies may be
obtained on NCUA's Web site, https://www.ncua.gov, or by contacting NCUA
at the address found in Section 790.2(c) of this chapter.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 3133-0015 and 3133-0116.)
0
3. IRPS 03-1, Chapter 3, Section III.A is revised to read as follows:
Note: The text of the IRPS 06-1 does not appear in the Code of
Federal Regulations.
A multiple common-bond federal credit union may include in its
field of membership, without regard to location, communities satisfying
the definition of underserved areas in the Federal Credit Union Act.
Adding an underserved area will not change the charter type of the
multiple common-bond federal credit union. More than one multiple
common-bond federal credit union can serve the same underserved area.
The Federal Credit Union Act defines an underserved area as a local
community, neighborhood, or rural district that is an ``investment
area'' as defined in Section 103(16) of the Community Development
Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994.
For an underserved area, the well-defined local community,
neighborhood, or rural district requirement is met if:
The area to be served is in a recognized single political
jurisdiction, i.e., a city, county, or their political equivalent, or
any contiguous portion thereof;
The area to be served is in multiple contiguous political
jurisdictions, i.e. a city, county, or their political equivalent, or
any contiguous portion thereof and if the population of the requested
well-defined area does not exceed 500,000; or
The area to be served is a Metropolitan Statistical Area
(MSA) or its equivalent, or a portion thereof, where the population of
the MSA or its equivalent does not exceed 1,000,000.
If the area to be served does not meet the MSA or multiple
political jurisdiction requirements outlined above, the application
must include documentation to support that it is a well-defined local
community, neighborhood, or rural district.
For an underserved area, an investment area includes any of the
following, as reported in the most recently completed decennial census
or equivalent government data:
An area that wholly consists of or is wholly located
within an Empowerment Zone or Enterprise Community designated under
section 1391 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 1391);
[[Page 36671]]
An area where the percentage of the population living in
poverty is at least 20 percent;
An area in a Metropolitan Area where the median family
income is at or below 80 percent of the Metropolitan Area median family
income or the national Metropolitan Area median family income,
whichever is greater;
An area outside of a Metropolitan Area, where the median
family income is at or below 80 percent of the statewide non-
Metropolitan Area median family income or the national non-Metropolitan
Area median family income, whichever is greater;
An area where the unemployment rate is at least 1.5 times
the national average;
An area meeting the criteria for economic distress that
may be established by the Community Development Financial Institutions
Fund (CDFI) of the United States Department of the Treasury.
In addition, the local community, neighborhood, or rural district
must be underserved, based on data considered by the NCUA Board and the
Federal banking agencies.
Once an underserved area is added to a Federal credit union's field
of membership, the credit union must establish and maintain an office
or service facility in the community within two years. A service
facility is defined as a place where shares are accepted for members'
accounts, loan applications are accepted and loans are disbursed. This
definition includes a credit union owned branch, a shared branch, a
mobile branch, an office operated on a regularly scheduled weekly
basis, or a credit union owned facility that meets, at a minimum, these
requirements. This definition does not include an ATM or the credit
union's Internet Web site.
The Federal credit union adding the underserved community must
document that the community meets the definition for serving
underserved areas in the Federal Credit Union Act. Adding an
underserved community does not change the charter type of a multiple
common-bond federal credit union. In order to receive the benefits
afforded to low-income designated credit unions, such as expanded use
of nonmember deposits and access to the Community Development Revolving
Loan Program for Credit Unions, a credit union must receive low-income
designation pursuant to 12 CFR 701.34.
A Federal credit union that desires to include an underserved
community in its field of membership must first develop a business plan
specifying how it will serve the community. The business plan, at a
minimum, must identify the credit and depository needs of the community
and detail how the credit union plans to serve those needs. The credit
union will be expected to review the business plan regularly to
determine if the community is being adequately served. The regional
director may require periodic service status reports from a credit
union about the underserved area to ensure that the needs of the
community are being met as well as requiring such reports before NCUA
allows a multiple common-bond Federal credit union to add an additional
underserved area.
[FR Doc. E6-10134 Filed 6-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P