Distributions of Interests in a Loss Corporation From Qualified Trusts, 36676-36678 [06-5676]

Download as PDF 36676 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations Minimums effective at 0901 UTC on the dates specified, as follows: PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES 1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721–44722. 2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows: mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES I * * * Effective 03 August 2006 Bessemer, AL, Bessemer, NDB RWY 5, Amdt 3, CANCELLED Fairhope, AL, H L Sonny Callahan, RNAV (GPS) RWY 1, Orig Fairhope, AL, H L Sonny Callahan, RNAV (GPS) RWY 19, Orig Fairhope, AL, H L Sonny Callahan, GPS RWY 1, Orig, CANCELLED Fairhope, AL, H L Sonny Callahan, VOR/ DME–A, Amdt 5 Fairhope, AL, H L Sonny Callahan, Takeoff Minimums and Textual DP, Orig Texarkana, AR, Texarkana Regional-Webb Field, VOR RWY 13, Amdt 16 Texarkana, AR, Texarkana Regional-Webb Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Orig Texarkana, AR, Texarkana Regional-Webb Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Orig Texarkana, AR, Texarkana Regional-Webb Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Orig Texarkana, AR, Texarkana Regional-Webb Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Orig Texarkana, AR, Texarkana Regional-Webb Field, GPS RWY 4, Orig-A, CANCELLED Texarkana, AR, Texarkana Regional-Webb Field, GPS RWY 22, Orig-A, CANCELLED Texarkana, AR, Texarkana Regional-Webb Field, GPS RWY 31, Orig-A, CANCELLED Tucson, AZ, Tucson Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 11L, Amdt 13 Tucson, AZ, Tucson Intl, RNAV (RNP) Y RWY 11L, Orig Tucson, AZ, Tucson Intl, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 11L, Amdt 1 Tucson, AZ, Tucson Intl, RNAV (RNP) Y RWY 29R, Orig Tucson, AZ, Tucson Intl, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 29R, Amdt 2 Oxnard, CA, Oxnard, LOC RWY 25, Orig Oxnard, CA, Oxnard, ILS RWY 25, Amdt 11 Pueblo, CO, Pueblo Memorial, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26R, Orig Pueblo, CO, Pueblo Memorial, GPS RWY 26R, Orig, CANCELLED Fort Myers, FL, Southwest Florida Intl, NDB RWY 5, Orig Fort Myers, FL, Southwest Florida Intl, VOR/ DME OR TACAN RWY 23, Orig Gary, IN, Gary/Chicago Intl, RNAV (RNP) RWY 12, Orig Oakley, KS, Oakley Muni, NDB RWY 34, Amdt 3 Oakley, KS, Oakley Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 34, Orig Oakley, KS, Oakley Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Textual DP, Orig Saginaw, MI, Saginaw County H.W. Browne, ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 27, Orig St. Louis, MO, Lambert-St. Louis Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 29, Amdt 1 VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:04 Jun 27, 2006 Jkt 208001 St. Louis, MO, Lambert-St. Louis Intl, ILS PRM RWY 29, Amdt 1 (Simultaneous Close Parallel) St. Louis, MO, Lambert-St. Louis Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 30R, ILS RWY 30R (CAT II); ILS RWY 30R (CAT III), Amdt 9 St. Louis, MO, Lambert-St. Louis Intl, ILS PRM RWY 30R, ILS PRM RWY 30R (CAT II), ILS PRM RWY 30R (CAT III), Amdt 1 (Simultaneous Close Parallel) St. Louis, MO, Lambert-St. Louis Intl, LDA PRM RWY 30L, Amdt 1 (Simultaneous Close Parallel) St. Louis, MO, Lambert-St. Louis Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 29, Orig St. Louis, MO, Lambert-St. Louis Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 30R, Amdt 1 St. Louis, MO, Lambert-St. Louis Intl, LDA/ DME RWY 30L, Amdt 1 Kalispell, MT, Glacier Park Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Amdt 1 Kalispell, MT, Glacier Park Intl, VOR/DME RWY 30, Amdt 10 Kalispell, MT, Glacier Park Intl, Takeoff Minimums and Textual DP, Amdt 3 Grand Forks, ND, Grand Forks Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17R, Orig Grand Forks, ND, Grand Forks Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Orig Grand Forks, ND, Grand Forks Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35L, Orig Grand Forks, ND, Grand Forks Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 35L, Amdt 12 Grand Forks, ND, Grand Forks Intl, VOR RWY 17R, Amdt 6 Grand Forks, ND, Grand Forks Intl, VOR RWY 35L, Amdt 7 Grand Forks, ND, Grand Forks Intl, GPS RWY 26, Orig-B, CANCELLED Grand Forks, ND, Grand Forks Intl, Takeoff Minimums and Textual DP, Amdt 1 Scottsbluff, NE, Western Neb. Rgnl/William B. Heilig Field, LOC/DME RWY 12, Orig Klamath Falls, OR, Klamath Falls, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Orig Klamath Falls, OR, Klamath Falls, VOR/DME OR TACAN RWY 14, Amdt 4 Walla Walla, WA, Walla Walla Regional, ILS OR LOC RWY 20, Amdt 8 * * * Effective 28 September 2006 Fort Lauderdale, FL, Fort Lauderdale/ Hollywood Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 1 Orlando, FL, Kissimmee Gateway, RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Orig Orlando, FL, Kissimmee Gateway, GPS RWY 33, Orig-B, CANCELLED The FAA published an Amendment in Docket No. 30498, Amdt No. 3170 to Part 97 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (Vol. 71, FR No. 114, Page 34247; dated Wednesday, June 14, 2006) under section 97.27 effective 28 September 2006, which is hereby RESCINDED as follows: Kelso, WA, Kelso-Longview, NDB OR GPS– A, Amdt 5C, CANCELLED [FR Doc. 06–5670 Filed 6–27–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 [TD 9269] RIN 1545–BC00 Distributions of Interests in a Loss Corporation From Qualified Trusts Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations under section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The final regulations affect loss corporations and provide guidance on whether a loss corporation has an owner shift where a qualified trust described in section 401(a) distributes an ownership interest in an entity. DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective June 23, 2006. Applicability Dates: For dates of applicability see § 1.382–10(a)(4). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith E. Stanley, (202) 622–7750, (not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background This document contains amendments to 26 CFR part 1. On June 27, 2003, temporary regulations (TD 9063; 68 FR 38177) regarding whether a loss corporation has an owner shift where a qualified trust described in section 401(a) distributes an ownership interest in an entity were published in the Federal Register. A notice of proposed rule making (REG–108676–03) crossreferencing the temporary regulations was published in the Federal Register for the same day (68 FR 38247). The temporary regulations provided that— (1) if a qualified trust distributes an ownership interest in an entity, then for testing dates on or after the date of the distribution, the distributed ownership interest will be treated as having been acquired by the distributee on the date and in the manner acquired by the trust, and (2) the distribution itself does not give rise to a testing date. They further provided that, in determining which ownership interests have been distributed, the loss corporation must account for all dispositions of ownership interests by the qualified trust either by specifically identifying the ownership interest disposed of, or by using a first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM 28JNR1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES The preamble of TD 9063 included background information and an explanation of provisions regarding the regulations. Also in the preamble, the IRS and Treasury Department requested comments regarding whether there are other events that, under current rules, are taken into account in determining whether an ownership change occurs, but do not cause the ultimate beneficial ownership of the loss corporation to change. In this regard, the IRS and Treasury Department indicated that they had been studying the constructive ownership rules as they apply to members of a family and the effect of those rules on the determination of whether a loss corporation has an ownership change. The IRS and Treasury Department expressed concern that, under the current rules, a change in the composition of a family might be interpreted in certain circumstances as shifting ownership even though there has been no change in the ultimate beneficial ownership of the loss corporation, as, for example, might occur when two individuals owning loss corporation stock get married. The IRS and Treasury Department further indicated that they were considering the promulgation of regulations to address such changes in family composition in a manner similar to that employed in the proposed regulations concerning qualified trusts. The IRS and Treasury Department will continue to study whether to issue regulations under section 382 concerning shifts in ownership resulting from certain changes in family composition. No comments were received responding to the notice of proposed rulemaking, and no public hearing was requested or held. The proposed regulations are adopted with no substantive change by this Treasury decision, and the corresponding temporary regulations are removed. Special Analyses It has been determined that this regulation is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), it has been determined that good cause exists to dispense with a delayed effective date on grounds that this regulation, which is substantively identical to currently effective temporary regulations and relieves a restriction on affected qualified trusts, merely continues to provide necessary guidance to taxpayers with respect to whether a loss corporation has an ownership change where a qualified trust described in VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:04 Jun 27, 2006 Jkt 208001 section 401(a) distributes an ownership interest in an entity. It is hereby certified that these regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This certification is based on the fact that the regulations provide relief to qualifying loss corporations that might be affected by an unintended consequence of the operation of the statute. Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the notice of proposed rulemaking preceding these final regulations was submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small business. Drafting Information The principal author of these regulations is Keith E. Stanley of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). Other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their development. List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1 Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows: I PART 1—INCOME TAXES Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding entries in numerical order to read, in part, as follows: I Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *. Section 1.382–10 also issued under 26 U.S.C 382(m). * * * I Par. 2. Section 1.382–1 is amended by removing the entry for § 1.382–10T and revising the entry for § 1.382–10 to read as follows: § 1.382–1 Table of contents. * * * * * § 1.382–10 Special rules for determining time and manner of acquisition of an interest in a loss corporation. * * * * * I Par. 3. Section 1.382–10 is added to read as follows: § 1.382–10 Special rules for determining time and manner of acquisition of an interest in a loss corporation. (a) Distributions from qualified trusts—(1) In general. For purposes of § 1.382–2T, if a qualified trust described in section 401(a) (qualified trust) PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 36677 distributes an ownership interest in an entity (as defined in § 1.382–3(a)(1)), then for testing dates on or after the date of the distribution, the distributed ownership interest is treated as having been acquired by the distributee on the date and in the manner acquired by the trust and not as having been acquired or disposed of by the trust. The distribution does not cause the day of the distribution to be a testing date. (2) Accounting for dispositions—(i) General rule. For purposes of this paragraph (a), in order to determine which ownership interest in an entity is distributed from a qualified trust, a loss corporation must either specifically identify the ownership interests that are the subject of all dispositions by the qualified trust of ownership interests in an entity, or apply the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method to all such dispositions. (ii) Special rules. For purposes of this paragraph (a)(2): (A) The FIFO method must be applied on a class-by-class basis; and (B) The term dispositions includes distributions, sales, and other transfers. (3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of this paragraph (a). For purposes of these examples, unless otherwise stated, the nomenclature and assumptions of the examples in § 1.382–2T(b) apply, all corporations file separate income tax returns on a calendar year basis, the only 5-percent shareholder of a loss corporation is a public group, and the facts set forth the only acquisitions of stock by any participants in a qualified plan and the only owner shifts with respect to the loss corporation during the testing period. The examples are as follows: Example 1—(i) Facts. In 1994, E, a qualified trust established under Plan F, acquires 10 percent of L stock. A is a participant in Plan F. On January 1, 2002, A acquires 4 percent of L stock, and B, who is not a participant or a beneficiary of a participant in Plan F, acquires 5 percent of L stock. On January 1, 2004, E distributes 2 percent of L stock to A. On July 1, 2004, A acquires 1 percent of L stock. (ii) Analysis. January 1, 2002, is a testing date because B’s acquisition of 5 percent of L stock causes an increase in the percentage ownership of B, a 5-percent shareholder. As of the close of that testing date, A is treated as owning only 4 percent of L stock. Therefore, A is treated as a member of the public group of L. In addition, E is treated as owning 10 percent of L stock that it acquired in 1994. (iii) As a result of the application of paragraph (a)(1) of this section to E’s distribution of 2 percent of L stock to A on January 1, 2004, for testing dates on and after January 1, 2004, A is treated as having acquired that 2 percent interest in L in 1994, and E is treated as having acquired only 8 percent of L stock in 1994. Because there are E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM 28JNR1 mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES 36678 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations no owner shifts on January 1, 2004, that date is not a testing date. (iv) July 1, 2004, is a testing date because on that date A, a 5-percent shareholder, acquires 1 percent of L stock. As of the close of that testing date, A’s percentage of ownership of L stock is 7 percent, and A’s lowest percentage of ownership of L stock at any time within the testing period is 2 percent (deemed acquired in 1994), representing an increase of 5 percentage points. In addition, as of the close of July 1, 2004, B’s percentage of ownership of L stock is 5 percent, and B’s lowest percentage of ownership of L stock at any time within the testing period is 0 percent, representing an increase of 5 percentage points. Thus, on July 1, 2004, L must take into account an increase of 10 (5 + 5) percentage points in determining whether it has an ownership change. Example 2—(i) Facts. E is a qualified trust established under Plan F. L, a publicly traded corporation, has 100x shares of stock outstanding. As of January 1, 2006, C owns 5x shares of L stock and is not a participant or beneficiary of a participant in Plan F. At all times prior to January 1, 2006, E owns no L stock. On January 1, 2006, E acquires 10x shares of L stock from members of the public group of L. On December 1, 2007, E distributes 5x shares of L stock to some of the participants in Plan F. No one participant acquires all 5x shares as a result of the distribution. On February 1, 2008, C purchases 1x shares of L stock from the public group of L. (ii) Analysis. Because E’s acquisition of 10x shares of L stock on January 1, 2006, is an owner shift, that date is a testing date. As of the close of that date, E’s percentage of stock ownership in L has increased by 10 percentage points. (iii) As a result of the application of paragraph (a)(1) of this section to E’s distribution of 5x shares of L stock to some Plan F participants on December 1, 2007, for testing dates on and after December 1, 2007, those distributees are treated as having acquired those shares of stock on January 1, 2006, from members of the public group of L, and E is not treated as having acquired those shares on that date. E’s distribution of the 5x shares is not an owner shift. Therefore, December 1, 2007, is not a testing date. (iv) February 1, 2008, is a testing date because on that date an owner shift results from C’s purchase of 1x shares of L stock. As of the close of that testing date, the distributees of 5x shares of L stock are treated as members of the public group of L having acquired 5x shares of L stock from other members of the public group of L on January 1, 2006. Because those acquisitions are not by 5-percent shareholders, L does not take them into account. In addition, as of the close of February 1, 2008, E’s percentage of stock ownership in L is 5 percent, and E’s lowest percentage of stock ownership in L at any time within the testing period is 0 percent, representing an increase of 5 percentage points. In addition, as of the close of February 1, 2008, C’s percentage of stock ownership in L is 6 percent, and C’s lowest percentage of stock ownership in L at any time within the testing period is 5 percent, representing an increase of 1 percentage point. Therefore, on February 1, 2008, L must VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:04 Jun 27, 2006 Jkt 208001 take into account an increase of 6 (5 + 1) percentage points in determining whether it has an ownership change. (4) Effective dates. This section applies to all distributions after June 23, 2006. For distributions on or before June 23, 2006, see § 1.382–10T as contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2006. (b) [Reserved] § 1.382–10T I [Removed] Par. 4. Section 1.382–10T is removed. Mark E. Matthews, Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. Approved: June 20, 2006. Eric Solomon, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy). [FR Doc. 06–5676 Filed 6–23–06; 9:48 am] BILLING CODE 4820–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 63 [EPA–R09–OAR–2006–0496; FRL–8190–1] Delegation of National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories; State of Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality Department; State of California; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; State of Nevada; Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA is amending certain regulations to reflect the current delegation status of national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAPs) in Arizona, California, and Nevada. Several NESHAPs were delegated to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department on May 16, 2006, to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District on October 31, 2005, and to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection on May 9, 2006. The purpose of this action is to update the listing in the Code of Federal Regulations. DATES: This rule is effective on August 28, 2006 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by July 28, 2006. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA–R09– PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 OAR–2006–0496, by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions. 2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 3. Mail or delivery: Andrew Steckel (Air–4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through https:// www.regulations.gov or e-mail. https:// www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mae Wang, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–4124, wang.mae@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. I. Background A. Delegation of NESHAPs Section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA), authorizes EPA to delegate to state or local air pollution control agencies the authority to implement and enforce the standards set out in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40 (40 CFR), Part 63, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM 28JNR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 28, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36676-36678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5676]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9269]
RIN 1545-BC00


Distributions of Interests in a Loss Corporation From Qualified 
Trusts

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations under section 382 of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The final regulations affect loss 
corporations and provide guidance on whether a loss corporation has an 
owner shift where a qualified trust described in section 401(a) 
distributes an ownership interest in an entity.

DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective June 23, 2006.
    Applicability Dates: For dates of applicability see Sec.  1.382-
10(a)(4).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith E. Stanley, (202) 622-7750, (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    This document contains amendments to 26 CFR part 1. On June 27, 
2003, temporary regulations (TD 9063; 68 FR 38177) regarding whether a 
loss corporation has an owner shift where a qualified trust described 
in section 401(a) distributes an ownership interest in an entity were 
published in the Federal Register. A notice of proposed rule making 
(REG-108676-03) cross-referencing the temporary regulations was 
published in the Federal Register for the same day (68 FR 38247). The 
temporary regulations provided that--(1) if a qualified trust 
distributes an ownership interest in an entity, then for testing dates 
on or after the date of the distribution, the distributed ownership 
interest will be treated as having been acquired by the distributee on 
the date and in the manner acquired by the trust, and (2) the 
distribution itself does not give rise to a testing date. They further 
provided that, in determining which ownership interests have been 
distributed, the loss corporation must account for all dispositions of 
ownership interests by the qualified trust either by specifically 
identifying the ownership interest disposed of, or by using a first-in, 
first-out (FIFO) method.

[[Page 36677]]

    The preamble of TD 9063 included background information and an 
explanation of provisions regarding the regulations. Also in the 
preamble, the IRS and Treasury Department requested comments regarding 
whether there are other events that, under current rules, are taken 
into account in determining whether an ownership change occurs, but do 
not cause the ultimate beneficial ownership of the loss corporation to 
change. In this regard, the IRS and Treasury Department indicated that 
they had been studying the constructive ownership rules as they apply 
to members of a family and the effect of those rules on the 
determination of whether a loss corporation has an ownership change. 
The IRS and Treasury Department expressed concern that, under the 
current rules, a change in the composition of a family might be 
interpreted in certain circumstances as shifting ownership even though 
there has been no change in the ultimate beneficial ownership of the 
loss corporation, as, for example, might occur when two individuals 
owning loss corporation stock get married.
    The IRS and Treasury Department further indicated that they were 
considering the promulgation of regulations to address such changes in 
family composition in a manner similar to that employed in the proposed 
regulations concerning qualified trusts. The IRS and Treasury 
Department will continue to study whether to issue regulations under 
section 382 concerning shifts in ownership resulting from certain 
changes in family composition.
    No comments were received responding to the notice of proposed 
rulemaking, and no public hearing was requested or held. The proposed 
regulations are adopted with no substantive change by this Treasury 
decision, and the corresponding temporary regulations are removed.

Special Analyses

    It has been determined that this regulation is not a significant 
regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a 
regulatory assessment is not required. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), 
it has been determined that good cause exists to dispense with a 
delayed effective date on grounds that this regulation, which is 
substantively identical to currently effective temporary regulations 
and relieves a restriction on affected qualified trusts, merely 
continues to provide necessary guidance to taxpayers with respect to 
whether a loss corporation has an ownership change where a qualified 
trust described in section 401(a) distributes an ownership interest in 
an entity. It is hereby certified that these regulations will not have 
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. This certification is based on the fact that the regulations 
provide relief to qualifying loss corporations that might be affected 
by an unintended consequence of the operation of the statute. 
Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to 
section 7805(f) of the Code, the notice of proposed rulemaking 
preceding these final regulations was submitted to the Chief Counsel 
for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its 
impact on small business.

Drafting Information

    The principal author of these regulations is Keith E. Stanley of 
the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). Other personnel from 
the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their development.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations

0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding 
entries in numerical order to read, in part, as follows:

    Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *.
    Section 1.382-10 also issued under 26 U.S.C 382(m). * * *


0
Par. 2. Section 1.382-1 is amended by removing the entry for Sec.  
1.382-10T and revising the entry for Sec.  1.382-10 to read as follows:


Sec.  1.382-1  Table of contents.

* * * * *
    Sec.  1.382-10 Special rules for determining time and manner of 
acquisition of an interest in a loss corporation.
* * * * *

0
Par. 3. Section 1.382-10 is added to read as follows:


Sec.  1.382-10  Special rules for determining time and manner of 
acquisition of an interest in a loss corporation.

    (a) Distributions from qualified trusts--(1) In general. For 
purposes of Sec.  1.382-2T, if a qualified trust described in section 
401(a) (qualified trust) distributes an ownership interest in an entity 
(as defined in Sec.  1.382-3(a)(1)), then for testing dates on or after 
the date of the distribution, the distributed ownership interest is 
treated as having been acquired by the distributee on the date and in 
the manner acquired by the trust and not as having been acquired or 
disposed of by the trust. The distribution does not cause the day of 
the distribution to be a testing date.
    (2) Accounting for dispositions--(i) General rule. For purposes of 
this paragraph (a), in order to determine which ownership interest in 
an entity is distributed from a qualified trust, a loss corporation 
must either specifically identify the ownership interests that are the 
subject of all dispositions by the qualified trust of ownership 
interests in an entity, or apply the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method 
to all such dispositions.
    (ii) Special rules. For purposes of this paragraph (a)(2):
    (A) The FIFO method must be applied on a class-by-class basis; and
    (B) The term dispositions includes distributions, sales, and other 
transfers.
    (3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of 
this paragraph (a). For purposes of these examples, unless otherwise 
stated, the nomenclature and assumptions of the examples in Sec.  
1.382-2T(b) apply, all corporations file separate income tax returns on 
a calendar year basis, the only 5-percent shareholder of a loss 
corporation is a public group, and the facts set forth the only 
acquisitions of stock by any participants in a qualified plan and the 
only owner shifts with respect to the loss corporation during the 
testing period. The examples are as follows:

    Example 1--(i) Facts. In 1994, E, a qualified trust established 
under Plan F, acquires 10 percent of L stock. A is a participant in 
Plan F. On January 1, 2002, A acquires 4 percent of L stock, and B, 
who is not a participant or a beneficiary of a participant in Plan 
F, acquires 5 percent of L stock. On January 1, 2004, E distributes 
2 percent of L stock to A. On July 1, 2004, A acquires 1 percent of 
L stock. (ii) Analysis. January 1, 2002, is a testing date because 
B's acquisition of 5 percent of L stock causes an increase in the 
percentage ownership of B, a 5-percent shareholder. As of the close 
of that testing date, A is treated as owning only 4 percent of L 
stock. Therefore, A is treated as a member of the public group of L. 
In addition, E is treated as owning 10 percent of L stock that it 
acquired in 1994.
    (iii) As a result of the application of paragraph (a)(1) of this 
section to E's distribution of 2 percent of L stock to A on January 
1, 2004, for testing dates on and after January 1, 2004, A is 
treated as having acquired that 2 percent interest in L in 1994, and 
E is treated as having acquired only 8 percent of L stock in 1994. 
Because there are

[[Page 36678]]

no owner shifts on January 1, 2004, that date is not a testing date.
    (iv) July 1, 2004, is a testing date because on that date A, a 
5-percent shareholder, acquires 1 percent of L stock. As of the 
close of that testing date, A's percentage of ownership of L stock 
is 7 percent, and A's lowest percentage of ownership of L stock at 
any time within the testing period is 2 percent (deemed acquired in 
1994), representing an increase of 5 percentage points. In addition, 
as of the close of July 1, 2004, B's percentage of ownership of L 
stock is 5 percent, and B's lowest percentage of ownership of L 
stock at any time within the testing period is 0 percent, 
representing an increase of 5 percentage points. Thus, on July 1, 
2004, L must take into account an increase of 10 (5 + 5) percentage 
points in determining whether it has an ownership change.

    Example 2--(i) Facts. E is a qualified trust established under 
Plan F. L, a publicly traded corporation, has 100x shares of stock 
outstanding. As of January 1, 2006, C owns 5x shares of L stock and 
is not a participant or beneficiary of a participant in Plan F. At 
all times prior to January 1, 2006, E owns no L stock. On January 1, 
2006, E acquires 10x shares of L stock from members of the public 
group of L. On December 1, 2007, E distributes 5x shares of L stock 
to some of the participants in Plan F. No one participant acquires 
all 5x shares as a result of the distribution. On February 1, 2008, 
C purchases 1x shares of L stock from the public group of L. (ii) 
Analysis. Because E's acquisition of 10x shares of L stock on 
January 1, 2006, is an owner shift, that date is a testing date. As 
of the close of that date, E's percentage of stock ownership in L 
has increased by 10 percentage points.
    (iii) As a result of the application of paragraph (a)(1) of this 
section to E's distribution of 5x shares of L stock to some Plan F 
participants on December 1, 2007, for testing dates on and after 
December 1, 2007, those distributees are treated as having acquired 
those shares of stock on January 1, 2006, from members of the public 
group of L, and E is not treated as having acquired those shares on 
that date. E's distribution of the 5x shares is not an owner shift. 
Therefore, December 1, 2007, is not a testing date.
    (iv) February 1, 2008, is a testing date because on that date an 
owner shift results from C's purchase of 1x shares of L stock. As of 
the close of that testing date, the distributees of 5x shares of L 
stock are treated as members of the public group of L having 
acquired 5x shares of L stock from other members of the public group 
of L on January 1, 2006. Because those acquisitions are not by 5-
percent shareholders, L does not take them into account. In 
addition, as of the close of February 1, 2008, E's percentage of 
stock ownership in L is 5 percent, and E's lowest percentage of 
stock ownership in L at any time within the testing period is 0 
percent, representing an increase of 5 percentage points. In 
addition, as of the close of February 1, 2008, C's percentage of 
stock ownership in L is 6 percent, and C's lowest percentage of 
stock ownership in L at any time within the testing period is 5 
percent, representing an increase of 1 percentage point. Therefore, 
on February 1, 2008, L must take into account an increase of 6 (5 + 
1) percentage points in determining whether it has an ownership 
change.

    (4) Effective dates. This section applies to all distributions 
after June 23, 2006. For distributions on or before June 23, 2006, see 
Sec.  1.382-10T as contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2006.
    (b) [Reserved]


Sec.  1.382-10T  [Removed]

0
Par. 4. Section 1.382-10T is removed.

Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
    Approved: June 20, 2006.
Eric Solomon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 06-5676 Filed 6-23-06; 9:48 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.