Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B (Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending June 9, 2006, 36604-36605 [E6-10086]

Download as PDF 36604 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 27, 2006 / Notices Achievable and relevant features should be cited in both program administration (program venue, study tour venue, and program evaluation) and program content (orientation and wrap-up sessions, site visits, program meetings and resource materials). 4. Evaluation and Follow-Up: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate the Institute’s success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original institute objectives is strongly recommended. Proposals should also discuss provisions made for follow-up with returned grantees as a means of establishing longer-term individual and institutional linkages. 5. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing: The overhead and administrative components of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other items should be necessary and appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through other private sector support as well as institutional direct funding contributions. 6. Institutional Track Record/Ability: Proposals should demonstrate an institutional record of successful exchange programs, including responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting requirements for past Bureau grants as determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The Bureau will consider the past performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants. Proposed personnel and institutional resources should be fully qualified to achieve the Institute’s goals. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES VI. Award Administration Information VI.1. Award Notices: Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive an Assistance Award Document (AAD) from the Bureau’s Grants Office. The AAD and the original grant proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S. Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and mailed to the recipient’s responsible officer identified in the application. Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this competition. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:33 Jun 26, 2006 Jkt 208001 VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the following: Office of Management and Budget Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations.’’ Office of Management and Budget Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.’’ OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Governments’’. OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations. OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments. OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations. Please reference the following Web sites for additional information: https:// www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants https:// exchanges.state.gov/education/ grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI. VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus one (1) copy of the final program and financial report no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. Please refer to Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information. All data collected, including survey responses and contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the Bureau upon request. All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer listed in the final assistance award document. VI.4. Program Data Requirements: Organizations awarded grants will be required to maintain specific data on program participants and activities in an electronically accessible database format that can be shared with the Bureau as required. As a minimum, the data must include the following: (1) Name, address, contact information and academic major of all participants. (2) Itineraries of international and domestic travel for all participants, providing dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 place. Final itineraries must be received by the ECA Program Officer at least three work days prior to the participants’ arrival in the United States. VII. Agency Contacts For questions about this announcement, contact: Sheila Casey, Branch for the Study of the United States, ECA/A/E/USS, Room 314, ECA/ A/E/USS–07-SK, U.S. Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547; tel. (202) 453– 8536; fax (202) 453–8533, e-mail: caseysd@state.gov. All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should reference the title ‘‘Study of the U.S. Institute for Korean Undergraduate Student Leaders’’ and number ECA/A/E/USS–07–SK. Please read the complete Federal Register announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed. VIII. Other Information Notice The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3 above. Dated: June 20, 2006. Dina Habib Powell, Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E6–10110 Filed 6–26–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–05–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B (Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending June 9, 2006 The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 27, 2006 / Notices permits were filed under subpart B (formerly subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation’s Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings. Docket Number: OST–1995–969. Date Filed: June 5, 2006. Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope: June 26, 2006. Description: Application of Northwest Airlines, Inc., requesting renewal of segment 2 of its certificate of public convenience and necessity for route 378, authorizing Northwest to provide scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Detroit, MI and Beijing, People’s Republic of China. Docket Number: OST–2000–8505. Date Filed: June 6, 2006. Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope: June 27, 2006. Description: Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc., (‘‘Delta’’) requesting renewal of its certificate of public convenience and necessity for Route 585, which authorizes Delta to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between the terminal point Los Angeles, CA, and the terminal point Tokyo, Japan. Docket Number: OST–1996–1318. Date Filed: June 9, 2006. Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope: June 30, 2006. Description: Application of Continental Airlines, Inc., requesting renewal of its Route 645 certificate authorizing Continental to provide scheduled air transportation of persons, property and mail between Houston and the coterminal points Barranquilla, Bogota and Cali, Colombia, via the intermediate point San Jose, Costa Rica for a period of no less than five years. Docket Number: OST–2006–25050. Date Filed: June 9, 2006. Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope: June 30, 2006. Description: Application of Air Greenland A.S. requesting an foreign air carrier permit and exemption authorizing it to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between a point or VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:33 Jun 26, 2006 Jkt 208001 points, in Greenland, on the one hand, and a point or points in the United States, on the other hand. Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison . [FR Doc. E6–10086 Filed 6–26–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA–2006–25071] Decision That Certain Nonconforming Motor Vehicles Are Eligible for Importation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, (NHTSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of decision by NHTSA that certain nonconforming motor vehicles are eligible for importation. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document announces decisions by NHTSA that certain motor vehicles not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards are eligible for importation into the United States because they are substantially similar to vehicles originally manufactured for importation into and/ or sale in the United States and certified by their manufacturers as complying with the safety standards, and they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards or because they have safety features that comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply with, all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards. DATES: These decisions became effective on the dates specified in Annex A. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–3151). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards shall be refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards. PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 36605 Where there is no substantially similar U.S.-certified motor vehicle, 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) permits a nonconforming motor vehicle to be admitted into the United States if its safety features comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply with, all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards based on destructive test data or such other evidence as NHTSA decides to be adequate. Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in the Federal Register. NHTSA received petitions from registered importers to decide whether the vehicles listed in Annex A to this notice are eligible for importation into the United States. To afford an opportunity for public comment, NHTSA published notice of these petitions as specified in Annex A. The reader is referred to those notices for a thorough description of the petitions. No substantive comments were received in response to these notices. Based on its review of the information submitted by the petitioners, NHTSA has decided to grant the petitions. Vehicle Eligibility Number for Subject Vehicles The importer of a vehicle admissible under any final decision must indicate on the form HS–7 accompanying entry the appropriate vehicle eligibility number indicating that the vehicle is eligible for entry. Vehicle eligibility numbers assigned to vehicles admissible under this decision are specified in Annex A. Final Decision Accordingly, on the basis of the foregoing, NHTSA hereby decides that each motor vehicle listed in Annex A to this notice, which was not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards, is either (1) substantially similar to a motor vehicle manufactured for importation into and/or sale in the United States, and certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, as specified in Annex A, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all applicable Federal E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36604-36605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10086]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending June 9, 2006

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier

[[Page 36605]]

permits were filed under subpart B (formerly subpart Q) of the 
Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 
301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or 
Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. 
Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by 
expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a 
show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final 
order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-1995-969.
    Date Filed: June 5, 2006.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: June 26, 2006.
    Description: Application of Northwest Airlines, Inc., requesting 
renewal of segment 2 of its certificate of public convenience and 
necessity for route 378, authorizing Northwest to provide scheduled 
foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between 
Detroit, MI and Beijing, People's Republic of China.

    Docket Number: OST-2000-8505.
    Date Filed: June 6, 2006.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: June 27, 2006.
    Description: Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc., (``Delta'') 
requesting renewal of its certificate of public convenience and 
necessity for Route 585, which authorizes Delta to engage in scheduled 
foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between the 
terminal point Los Angeles, CA, and the terminal point Tokyo, Japan.

    Docket Number: OST-1996-1318.
    Date Filed: June 9, 2006.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: June 30, 2006.
    Description: Application of Continental Airlines, Inc., requesting 
renewal of its Route 645 certificate authorizing Continental to provide 
scheduled air transportation of persons, property and mail between 
Houston and the coterminal points Barranquilla, Bogota and Cali, 
Colombia, via the intermediate point San Jose, Costa Rica for a period 
of no less than five years.

    Docket Number: OST-2006-25050.
    Date Filed: June 9, 2006.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: June 30, 2006.
    Description: Application of Air Greenland A.S. requesting an 
foreign air carrier permit and exemption authorizing it to engage in 
scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail 
between a point or points, in Greenland, on the one hand, and a point 
or points in the United States, on the other hand.

Renee V. Wright,
 Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison .
 [FR Doc. E6-10086 Filed 6-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.