Safety Zone; Clearwater Harbor, FL, 36204-36206 [E6-10047]
Download as PDF
36204
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 122 / Monday, June 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This
event establishes a safety zone therefore
paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction
applies.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are available
in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
of regulated navigation areas and safety
and security zones.
(c) Effective Period. This rule is
effective from 12 noon (local) through 4
p.m. (local) on July 9th, 2006.
(d) Regulations. Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his
designated on-scene representative. The
Coast Guard may be contacted via VHF
Channel 16 during this event.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard temporarily
amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
33 CFR Part 165
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
I 2. A new temporary § 165.T09–060 is
added read as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
§ 165.T09–060 Safety Zone; Lake Erie,
Mentor, Ohio, Mentor Power Boat Race.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the south
shore of Lake Erie within a box drawn
from 41°43.70′ N 081°21.20′ W to
41°44.45′ N 081°22.00′ W to 41°46.40′ N
081°18.15′ W to 41°45.40′ N 081°17.50′
W thence following the shore line to
origin. These coordinates are based
upon North American Datum 1983
(NAD 83).
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
Designated on-scene representative
means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating
Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, State,
and local officers designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP),
Buffalo, New York, in the enforcement
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:58 Jun 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
Dated: June 15, 2006.
S.J. Furguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. E6–10046 Filed 6–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[COTP St. Petersburg 06–104]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Clearwater Harbor, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of Clearwater Harbor,
Florida. This rule is necessary to protect
participants and spectators from the
hazards associated with the launching
of fireworks over the navigable waters of
the United States.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30
p.m. through 10 p.m. on July 4, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket [COTP 06–104]
and are available for inspection or
copying at Coast Guard Sector St.
Petersburg, Prevention Department, 155
Columbia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33606–
3598 between 7:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Waterways Management Division at
Coast Guard Sector St. Petersburg, (813)
228–2191 Ext 8307.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM.
Information regarding the event was not
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
provided with sufficient time to publish
an NPRM. Publishing an NPRM and
delaying its effective date would be
contrary to the public interest since
immediate action is needed to minimize
potential danger to the public during the
fireworks demonstration. The Coast
Guard will issue a broadcast notice to
mariners to advise mariners of the
restriction.
For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. The
Coast Guard will issue a broadcast
notice to mariners to advise mariners of
the restriction.
Background and Purpose
The City of Clearwater, Florida is
sponsoring a fireworks display on July
4, 2006 from the Clearwater Memorial
Causeway on the west side of the
Clearwater Memorial Bride. Although
the fireworks will be launched from
land, the fallout area extends over the
Intracoastal Waterway and a large
portion of Clearwater Harbor. This rule
is needed to protect spectator craft in
the vicinity of the fireworks
presentation from the hazards
associated with the launching of
fireworks. This safety zone is being
established to ensure safety of life
during the fireworks display.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone encompasses the
following: All waters from surface to
bottom, within a 300-yard radius of the
west side of the Clearwater Memorial
Bridge, approximate position: 27°58′01″
N, 082°48′15″ W. Vessels are prohibited
from anchoring, mooring, or transiting
within this zone, unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or
his designated representative. The zone
will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. until 10
p.m. on July 4, 2006.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. The rule will only
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 122 / Monday, June 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
be enforced for one-and-one-half hours
in an area and during a time when
vessel traffic is minimal. Moreover,
vessels may still enter the safety zone
with the express permission of the
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or his
designated representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit Clearwater
Harbor in the vicinity of the Clearwater
Memorial Causeway. This safety zone
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities for the following reasons: This
rule will be enforced in a location where
traffic is minimal and for a limited time;
and traffic will be allowed to enter the
zone with the permission of the Captain
of the Port St. Petersburg or his
designated representative.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. Small entities may contact the
office listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT for assistance in
understanding and participating in this
rulemaking. We also have a point of
contact for commenting on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard. Small
businesses may send comments on the
actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:58 Jun 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36205
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Division 5100.0, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. A final
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a final ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
36206
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 122 / Monday, June 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09–06–049]
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
I
RIN 1625–AA00
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g),
6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295,
116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
I 2. A new temporary § 165.T07–104 is
added to read as follows:
§ 165.T07–104 Safety Zone; Clearwater
Harbor, Florida.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
(a) Regulated area. The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of Clearwater Harbor,
Florida, that includes all the waters
from surface to bottom, within a 300
yard radius of the west side of the
Clearwater Memorial Bridge, centered at
the following coordinates: 27°58′01″ N,
082°48′15″ W. All coordinates
referenced use datum: NAD 83.
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
Designated representative means
Coast Guard Patrol Commanders
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating
Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, State,
and local officers designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port, St.
Petersburg, in the enforcement of
regulated navigation areas and safety
and security zones.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, no person or vessel may
anchor, moor, or transit the Regulated
Area without permission of the Captain
of the Port St Petersburg, Florida, or his
designated representative.
(d) Dates. This rule will be enforced
from 8:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on July 4,
2006.
Dated: June 9, 2006.
E.A. Pepper,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port St. Petersburg, Florida, Acting.
[FR Doc. E6–10047 Filed 6–23–06; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:58 Jun 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
Safety Zone; Island Festival Fireworks
Display, Baldwinsville, NY
with fireworks displays. Based on recent
accidents that have occurred in other
Captain of the Port zones, and the
explosive hazard of fireworks, the
Captain of the Port Buffalo has
determined fireworks displays pose
significant risks to public safety and
property.
The likely combination of large
numbers of recreational vessels,
congested waterways, and alcohol use,
could easily result in serious injuries or
fatalities.
Discussion of Rule
The proposed safety zone consists of
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
all navigable waters of the Seneca River
establishing a temporary safety zone
in a 500-foot radius around a point at
encompassing the navigable waters of
approximate position: 43°09′25″ N,
the Seneca River at the Budweiser
076°20′21″ W (NAD 1983) in
Amphitheater near Lock 24 in
Baldwinsville, NY. All Geographic
Baldwinsville, NY. This safety zone is
coordinates are North American Datum
necessary to ensure the safety of
of 1983 (NAD 83). The size of this
spectators and vessels from the hazards
associated with fireworks displays. This proposed zone was determined using
safety zone restricts vessel traffic from a the National Fire Prevention
Association guidelines.
portion of the Seneca River at the
All persons and vessels shall comply
Budweiser Amphitheater near Lock 24
with the instructions of the Coast Guard
in Baldwinsville, NY.
Captain of the Port or his designated
DATES: This rule is in effect from 10 p.m.
representative. The designated on-scene
(local) until 10:30 p.m. (local) on July 1,
representative will be the patrol
2006.
commander. Entry into, transiting, or
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
anchoring within this safety zone is
preamble as being available in the
prohibited unless authorized by the
docket are part of the docket [CGD09–
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his
06–049], and are available for inspection designated on-scene representative. The
or copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Captain of the Port or his designated onBuffalo, 1 Fuhrmann Blvd, Buffalo, New scene representative may be contacted
York 14203 between 7 a.m. and 4 p.m.
via VHF Channel 16.
(local), Monday through Friday, except
Regulatory Evaluation
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
Tracy Wirth, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Buffalo, at (716) 843–9573.
Executive Order 12866 and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Regulatory Information
Order. The Office of Management and
We did not publish a notice of
Budget has not reviewed this rule under
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
that Order. It is not significant under the
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the regulatory policies and procedures of
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists the Department of Homeland Security
for not publishing an NPRM. This safety (DHS). We expect the economic impact
zone is temporary in nature and limited of this rule to be so minimal that a full
time existed for an NPRM.
Regulatory Evaluation under the
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
regulatory policies and procedures of
Guard finds that good cause exists for
DHS is unnecessary.
making this rule effective less than 30
This determination is based on the
days after publication in the Federal
minimal time that vessels will be
Register. Delaying this rule would be
restricted from the zone, and the zone
impracticable and contrary to public
is in areas where the Coast Guard
interest since immediate action is
expects insignificant adverse impact to
needed to minimize potential danger to
mariners from the zone’s activation.
the public during the fireworks
Small Entities
demonstration.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
Background and Purpose
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
Temporary safety zones are necessary whether this rule will have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
to ensure the safety of vessels and
entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’
spectators from the hazards associated
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 122 (Monday, June 26, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36204-36206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10047]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP St. Petersburg 06-104]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Clearwater Harbor, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
waters of Clearwater Harbor, Florida. This rule is necessary to protect
participants and spectators from the hazards associated with the
launching of fireworks over the navigable waters of the United States.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 p.m. through 10 p.m. on July 4,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket [COTP 06-104] and are available for
inspection or copying at Coast Guard Sector St. Petersburg, Prevention
Department, 155 Columbia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33606-3598 between 7:30
a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Waterways Management Division at
Coast Guard Sector St. Petersburg, (813) 228-2191 Ext 8307.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. Information regarding the
event was not provided with sufficient time to publish an NPRM.
Publishing an NPRM and delaying its effective date would be contrary to
the public interest since immediate action is needed to minimize
potential danger to the public during the fireworks demonstration. The
Coast Guard will issue a broadcast notice to mariners to advise
mariners of the restriction.
For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The Coast Guard will
issue a broadcast notice to mariners to advise mariners of the
restriction.
Background and Purpose
The City of Clearwater, Florida is sponsoring a fireworks display
on July 4, 2006 from the Clearwater Memorial Causeway on the west side
of the Clearwater Memorial Bride. Although the fireworks will be
launched from land, the fallout area extends over the Intracoastal
Waterway and a large portion of Clearwater Harbor. This rule is needed
to protect spectator craft in the vicinity of the fireworks
presentation from the hazards associated with the launching of
fireworks. This safety zone is being established to ensure safety of
life during the fireworks display.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone encompasses the following: All waters from surface
to bottom, within a 300-yard radius of the west side of the Clearwater
Memorial Bridge, approximate position: 27[deg]58'01'' N,
082[deg]48'15'' W. Vessels are prohibited from anchoring, mooring, or
transiting within this zone, unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg or his designated representative. The zone will be
enforced from 8:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on July 4, 2006.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary. The rule will only
[[Page 36205]]
be enforced for one-and-one-half hours in an area and during a time
when vessel traffic is minimal. Moreover, vessels may still enter the
safety zone with the express permission of the Captain of the Port St.
Petersburg or his designated representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit Clearwater Harbor in the vicinity of the Clearwater Memorial
Causeway. This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons:
This rule will be enforced in a location where traffic is minimal and
for a limited time; and traffic will be allowed to enter the zone with
the permission of the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or his
designated representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small
entities may contact the office listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT for assistance in understanding and participating in this
rulemaking. We also have a point of contact for commenting on actions
by employees of the Coast Guard. Small businesses may send comments on
the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Division 5100.0, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a
final ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
[[Page 36206]]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. A new temporary Sec. 165.T07-104 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T07-104 Safety Zone; Clearwater Harbor, Florida.
(a) Regulated area. The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary
safety zone on the waters of Clearwater Harbor, Florida, that includes
all the waters from surface to bottom, within a 300 yard radius of the
west side of the Clearwater Memorial Bridge, centered at the following
coordinates: 27[deg]58'01'' N, 082[deg]48'15'' W. All coordinates
referenced use datum: NAD 83.
(b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
Designated representative means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and other officers
operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, State, and local officers
designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port, St. Petersburg, in
the enforcement of regulated navigation areas and safety and security
zones.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, no person or vessel may anchor, moor, or
transit the Regulated Area without permission of the Captain of the
Port St Petersburg, Florida, or his designated representative.
(d) Dates. This rule will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. until 10 p.m.
on July 4, 2006.
Dated: June 9, 2006.
E.A. Pepper,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port St. Petersburg,
Florida, Acting.
[FR Doc. E6-10047 Filed 6-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P