Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri, 36298-36299 [06-5624]
Download as PDF
36298
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 122 / Monday, June 26, 2006 / Proposed Rules
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
are planning to comment. After that,
individuals who arrived prior to the
start of the meeting on July 18, 2006,
and received numbers in the lobby will
be called. After all of these individuals
have been called, the moderator will
then ask for members of the audience
who have not provided advance
notification or who did not arrive prior
to the meeting to come forward, sign-in
with the recorder, and then be able to
approach the podium to deliver
comments.
Send written material and requests to
make oral comments to Commander
(dpb), Fifth Coast Guard District,
Federal Building, 1st Floor, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, VA
23704–5004 or via fax at (757) 398–6334
or by e-mail at gary.s.heyer@uscg.mil.
The agenda of the public meeting will
include the following:
(1) Introduction of panel members.
(2) Overview of meeting format.
(3) Background on the proposed
rulemaking.
(4) Statements from citizens.
Statements may be delivered in written
form at the public meeting and made
part of the docket or delivered orally not
to exceed 5 minutes.
Questions
We need assistance from the public in
ensuring the Coast Guard fully
understands the impact of potential
rulemaking on all users of the bridge,
both road and waterway usage. We
believe that the impacts can be better
understood by articulating answers to
questions such as those posed below. In
responding to the questions listed
below, please explain your reasons for
each answer as specifically as possible
so that we can weigh the impacts and
consequences of future actions that we
may take. The following are the types of
pertinent questions that may be used:
(1) If the SR 175 Bridge opened every
two hours, would this have a positive or
a negative impact on your business
interests? And, what would be the
approximate monetary value of this
impact per day?
(2) If the SR 175 Bridge opened every
two hours, would this increase or
decrease the time you spend per day as
a motor vehicle commuter? And,
approximately how much would your
commuting time increase or decrease?
(3) If the SR 175 Bridge opened every
two hours and this opening schedule
had a negative impact on your business
interests, what actions could you take,
if any, to minimize the negative impact?
(4) If the SR 175 Bridge continued to
open once per hour, would this have a
negative or positive financial impact on
your life or business? And, what would
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:18 Jun 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
be the approximate amount of the
negative or positive financial impact per
day?
(5) Is there a traffic management plan
in place that directs how to manage a
vehicle back-up at the SR 175 Bridge?
And if there is a plan, what procedures
are in place to increase public safety
and reduce traffic delays at the Bridge?
Any additional information provided on
these topics is welcome.
Information on Services for Individuals
With Disabilities
For information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities
or to request special assistance at the
meeting, contact Mr. Gary S. Heyer as
listed in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT as soon as possible.
Dated: June 13, 2006.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U. S. Coast Guard,
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–10048 Filed 6–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Chapter 1
Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory
Committee for Dog Management at
Golden Gate National Recreation Area
ACTION:
Notice of fourth meeting.
Notice is hereby given, in accordance
with the Federal Advisory Committee
Act (Pub. L. 92–463, 86 Stat. 770, 5
U.S.C. App 1, section 10), of the fourth
meeting of the Negotiated Rulemaking
Advisory Committee for Dog
Management at Golden Gate National
Recreation Area.
DATES: The Committee will meet on
Monday, July 31, 2006 in the Golden
Gate Room, Building A, Fort Mason
Center in San Francisco. The meeting
will begin at 3:30 p.m. This, and any
subsequent meetings, will be held to
assist the National Park Service in
potentially developing a special
regulation for dogwalking at Golden
Gate National Recreation Area.
The proposed agenda for this meeting
of the Committee may contain the
following items; however, the
Committee may modify its agenda
during the course of its work. The
Committee will provide for a public
comment period during the meeting.
1. Agenda review.
2. Approval of May 15 meeting
summary.
3. Updates and announcements.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4. Report from first Technical
Subcommittee meeting.
5. Discussion of Interests Assessment
Template.
6. Public comment.
7. Adjourn.
To request a sign language interpreter
for a meeting, please call the park TDD
line (415) 556–2766, at least a week in
advance of the meeting. Please note that
Federal regulations prohibit pets in
public buildings, with the exception of
service animals; please leave pets at
home.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Go
to the NPS Planning, Environment and
Public Comment (PEPC) Web site,
https://www.parkplanning.nps.gov/goga
and select Negotiated Rulemaking for
Dog Management at GGNRA or call the
Dog Management Information Line at
415–561–4728.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meetings are open to the public. The
Committee was established pursuant to
the Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1990
(5 U.S.C. 561–570). The purpose of the
Committee is to consider developing a
special regulation for dogwalking at
Golden Gate National Recreation Area.
Interested persons may provide brief
oral/written comments to the Committee
during the Public Comment period of
the meeting or file written comments
with the GGNRA Superintendent.
Dated: June 20, 2006.
Loran Fraser,
Chief, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. E6–10013 Filed 6–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–FN–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2006–0286; FRL–8188–5]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the state of
Missouri for maintaining the ozone
standard in Kansas City.
DATES: Comments on this proposed
action must be received in writing by
July 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2006–0286 by one of the following
methods:
E:\FR\FM\26JNP1.SGM
26JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 122 / Monday, June 26, 2006 / Proposed Rules
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Amy Algoe-Eakin,
Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to: Amy Algoe-Eakin,
Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office’s
normal hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:30,
excluding legal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Algoe-Eakin at 913 551–7942, or
by e-mail at algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
In the
final rules section of the Federal
Register, EPA is approving the state’s
SIP revision as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
revision amendment and anticipates no
relevant adverse comments to this
action. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments
are received in response to this action,
no further activity is contemplated in
relation to this action. If EPA receives
relevant adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed action. EPA will
not institute a second comment period
on this action. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so
at this time. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on part of
this rule and if that part can be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may
adopt as final those parts of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment. For additional information,
see the direct final rule which is located
in the rules section of this Federal
Register.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: June 15, 2006.
James B. Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 06–5624 Filed 6–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:18 Jun 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2006–0365; FRL–8188–3]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of Kansas
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the state of
Kansas for updating the maintenance
plan to maintain the ozone standard in
Kansas City.
DATES: Comments on this proposed
action must be received in writing by
July 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2006–0365 by one of the following
methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: kneib.gina@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Gina Kneib, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to: Gina Kneib,
Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office’s
normal hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:30,
excluding legal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
Gina
Kneib at (913) 551–7078, or by e-mail at
kneib.gina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
final rules section of the Federal
Register, EPA is approving the state’s
SIP revision as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
revision amendment and anticipates no
relevant adverse comments to this
action. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments
are received in response to this action,
no further activity is contemplated in
relation to this action. If EPA receives
relevant adverse comments, the direct
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36299
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed action. EPA will
not institute a second comment period
on this action. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so
at this time. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on part of
this rule and if that part can be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may
adopt as final those parts of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment. For additional information,
see the direct final rule which is located
in the rules section of this Federal
Register.
Dated: June 15, 2006.
James B. Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 06–5622 Filed 6–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 224
[Docket No. 040506143–6016–02. I.D.
101205B]
RIN 0648–AS36
Endangered Fish and Wildlife;
Proposed Rule to Implement Speed
Restrictions to Reduce the Threat of
Ship Collisions with North Atlantic
Right Whales
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to
implement speed restrictions on vessels
65 ft (19.8 m) or greater in overall length
in certain locations and at certain times
of the year along the east coast of the
U.S. Atlantic seaboard. The purpose of
this proposed rule is to reduce the
likelihood of deaths and serious injuries
to endangered North Atlantic right
whales that result from collisions with
ships. These measures are part of
NMFS’ Ship Strike Reduction Strategy
to help recover the North Atlantic right
whale. NMFS is requesting comments
on the proposed regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be
received at the appropriate address or
facsimile (fax) number (see ADDRESSES)
no later than 5 p.m. local time on
August 25, 2006.
E:\FR\FM\26JNP1.SGM
26JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 122 (Monday, June 26, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36298-36299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5624]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2006-0286; FRL-8188-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the state of Missouri for maintaining the ozone
standard in Kansas City.
DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by
July 26, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2006-0286 by one of the following methods:
[[Page 36299]]
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Amy Algoe-Eakin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: Amy Algoe-
Eakin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development
Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours
of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:30, excluding legal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules
section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to
submit comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Algoe-Eakin at 913 551-7942, or by
e-mail at algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of the Federal
Register, EPA is approving the state's SIP revision as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no relevant adverse
comments to this action. A detailed rationale for the approval is set
forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are
received in response to this action, no further activity is
contemplated in relation to this action. If EPA receives relevant
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this
action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives
adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those parts of
the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional
information, see the direct final rule which is located in the rules
section of this Federal Register.
Dated: June 15, 2006.
James B. Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 06-5624 Filed 6-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P