Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From Requirements of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 236, 36166-36167 [E6-9970]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
36166
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 121 / Friday, June 23, 2006 / Notices
the ALS Gateway Yard in East St. Louis,
Illinois, a distance of no more than 11⁄4
mile. This move is made entirely within
yard limits and does not cross any
public road crossings. The interchange
cut in question is a complete train that
has had a Class I brake test, but has had
the locomotive power removed and is
‘‘off-air’’ for more than four hours.
ALS states that the reason for this
request is due to the conditions of the
crime and violent acts that have
happened at this location and the
surrounding neighborhood in the past
two years. ALS has had two employees
accosted on a locomotive and one
employee assaulted while performing
work at this interchange. One employee
was assaulted and killed from a gun
shot in this same area. ALS has a policy
to only pull cars from this area during
daylight hours.
Due to the reasons stated above, ALS
would like to be able to perform a Class
III brake test—trainline continuity
inspection, in lieu of performing a Class
I brake test for this short move.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2005–
23458) and must be submitted to the
Docket Clerk, DOT Docket Management
Facility, Room PL–401 (Plaza Level),
400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590. Communications received within
30 days of the date of this notice will
be considered by FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at https://
dms.dot.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78). The
Statement may also be found at https://
dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 19,
2006.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E6–9971 Filed 6–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of
Discontinuance or Modification of a
Railroad Signal System or Relief From
the Requirements of Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 235 and 49
U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroads
have petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) seeking approval
for the discontinuance or modification
of the signal system or relief from the
requirements of 49 CFR part 236 as
detailed below.
[Docket Number FRA–2006–24987]
Applicants: Union Pacific Railroad
Company, Mr. W.E. Wimmer, Vice
President—Engineering, 1400 Douglas
Street, Mail Stop 0910, Omaha,
Nebraska 68179.
BNSF Railway Company, Mr. Ralph E.
Young, Director Signal Engineering,
4515 Kansas Avenue, Kansas City,
Kansas 66106–1199.
The Union Pacific Railroad Company
(UP) and the BNSF Railway Company,
jointly seek approval of the proposed
modification of the traffic control
system on the two main tracks, between
milepost 232 and milepost 235 on the
UP’s Houston West Belt Subdivision,
near Houston, Texas. The proposed
changes consist of the removal of four
control points, conversion of the
remaining industry lead switches to
hand operation with leaving signals,
and removal of several intermediate
signals.
The reason given for the proposed
changes is that the removal of
unnecessary switches and signals will
allow more trains to move through the
corridor efficiently without undue
delay, while maintaining safety.
Any interested party desiring to
protest the granting of an application
shall set forth specifically the grounds
upon which the protest is made, and
contain a concise statement of the
interest of the party in the proceeding.
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Additionally, one copy of the protest
shall be furnished to the applicant at the
address listed above.
All communications concerning this
proceeding should be identified by the
docket number and must be submitted
to the Docket Clerk, DOT Central Docket
Management Facility, Room PL–401
(Plaza Level), 400 7th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Communications received within 45
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by the FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA wishes to inform all potential
commenters that anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–
78) or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA expects to be able to determine
these matters without an oral hearing.
However, if a specific request for an oral
hearing is accompanied by a showing
that the party is unable to adequately
present his or her position by written
statements, an application may be set
for public hearing.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 19,
2006.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E6–9969 Filed 6–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of
Discontinuance or Modification of a
Railroad Signal System or Relief From
Requirements of Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 235 and 49
U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad
has petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) seeking approval
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 121 / Friday, June 23, 2006 / Notices
for the discontinuance or modification
of the signal system or relief from the
requirements of 49 CFR part 236 as
detailed below.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
[Docket Number FRA–2006–24646]
Applicant: Union Pacific Railroad,
Mr. John C. Estes, Jr., Superintendent
Locomotive, 1400 Douglas Stop 1050,
Omaha, Nebraska 68179.
The Union Pacific Railroad Company
(UP) seeks relief from the requirements
of the Rules, Standards and Instructions,
Title 49 CFR, part 236, section 236.586,
Daily or after trip test. Specifically, UP
is seeking to change the administration
of the first sentence in paragraph (a)
from ‘‘intervals of not more than 2
months’’ to ‘‘intervals of not more than
92 days’’ for all cab signal devices on
locomotives operated on the UP.
Applicant’s justification for relief: To
maximize overall safety by performing
maintenance in the best working
environment with the highest skilled
and best trained personnel, which can
best be achieved by performing
maintenance in conjunction with the
92-day periodic inspection.
Any interested party desiring to
protest the granting of an application
shall set forth specifically the grounds
upon which the protest is made, and
include a concise statement of the
interest of the party in the proceeding.
Additionally, one copy of the protest
shall be furnished to the applicant at the
address listed above.
All communications concerning this
proceeding should be identified by the
docket number and must be submitted
to the Docket Clerk, DOT Central Docket
Management Facility, Room PI–401, 400
7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590–
0001. Communications received within
45 days of the date of this notice will
be considered by the FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at https://
dms.dot.gov.
FRA wishes to inform all potential
commenters that anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
(Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–
78) or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA expects to be able to determine
these matters without an oral hearing.
However, if a specific request for an oral
hearing is accompanied by a showing
that the party is unable to adequately
present his or her position by written
statements, an application may be set
for public hearing.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 19,
2006.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E6–9970 Filed 6–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2006–
3)]
Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor
Surface Transportation Board.
Approval of rail cost adjustment
AGENCY:
ACTION:
factor.
SUMMARY: The Board has approved the
third quarter 2006 rail cost adjustment
factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by
the Association of American Railroads.
The third quarter 2006 RCAF
(Unadjusted) is 1.192. The third quarter
2006 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.566. The
third quarter 2006 RCAF–5 is 0.540.
DATES: Effective Date: July 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mac
Frampton, (202) 565–1541. [Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the
hearing impaired: 1–800–877–8339.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Additional information is contained in
the Board’s decision, which is available
on our Web site https://www.stb.dot.gov.
To purchase a copy of the full decision,
write to, e-mail or call the Board’s
contractor, ASAP Document Solutions;
9332 Annapolis Rd., Suite 103, Lanham,
MD 20706; e-mail asapdc@verizon.net;
phone (202) 306–4004. [Assistance for
the hearing impaired is available
through FIRS: 1–800–877–8339.]
This action will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human
environment or energy conservation.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we
conclude that our action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Decided: June 19, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36167
By the Board, Chairman Buttrey and Vice
Chairman Mulvey.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–9943 Filed 6–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34729 (Sub-No.
1)]
Saginaw Bay Southern Railway
Company—Acquisition and Operation
Exemption—In Saginaw County, MI
Saginaw Bay Southern Railway
Company (SBS), a Class III rail carrier,
has filed a verified notice of exemption
under 49 CFR 1150.41 to acquire from
CSX Transportation, Inc. its contractual
right to operate, via trackage rights, over
approximately 6.84 miles of rail line
owned by Huron & Eastern Railway
Company, Inc. (HESR) in Saginaw
County, MI, extending from a point 440
feet northeast of GTW milepost 40.96
along the Zilwaukee Spur at the
Saginaw Station to milepost CBE 7.72 at
the Paines Station.1
SBS certifies that its projected
revenues as a result of this transaction
will not result in the creation of a Class
II or Class I rail carrier. SBS further
certifies that its projected annual
revenues are expected to exceed $5
million. SBS has included a request in
its notice filed on May 26, 2006, for
waiver of the requirements of 49 CFR
1150.42(e) to permit the exemption to
become effective without providing the
60-day advance notice. Finding no
adverse impact on the affected
employees, by decision served on June
19, 2006, the Board has granted SBS’s
request and waived the requirements of
49 CFR 1150.42(e).2 The waiver
decision has the effect of making the
1 This notice was filed pursuant to the Board’s
May 5, 2006 decision directing SBS to file a new
notice of exemption to acquire the authority sought
here. See Saginaw Bay Southern Railway
Company—Acquisition and Operation Exemption—
Rail line of CSX Transportation, Inc., STB Finance
Docket No. 34729 (STB served May 5, 2006). SBS
had inadvertently failed to include what would
have been a grant of incidental trackage rights to
operate over HESR’s line in its notice of exemption
filed on September 1, 2005, and thus did not have
Board authority to operate over the subject line. See
Saginaw Bay Southern Railway Company—
Acquisition and Operation Exemption—Rail line of
CSX Transportation, Inc., STB Finance Docket No.
34729 (STB served and published in the Federal
Register on Sept. 27, 2005) (70 FR 56525).
2 See Saginaw Bay Southern Railway Company—
Acquisition and Operation Exemption—In Saginaw
County, MI, STB Finance Docket No. 34729 (SubNo. 1) (STB served June 19, 2006).
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 121 (Friday, June 23, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36166-36167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-9970]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or
Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From Requirements of
Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 235 and
49 U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad has petitioned the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking approval
[[Page 36167]]
for the discontinuance or modification of the signal system or relief
from the requirements of 49 CFR part 236 as detailed below.
[Docket Number FRA-2006-24646]
Applicant: Union Pacific Railroad, Mr. John C. Estes, Jr.,
Superintendent Locomotive, 1400 Douglas Stop 1050, Omaha, Nebraska
68179.
The Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) seeks relief from the
requirements of the Rules, Standards and Instructions, Title 49 CFR,
part 236, section 236.586, Daily or after trip test. Specifically, UP
is seeking to change the administration of the first sentence in
paragraph (a) from ``intervals of not more than 2 months'' to
``intervals of not more than 92 days'' for all cab signal devices on
locomotives operated on the UP.
Applicant's justification for relief: To maximize overall safety by
performing maintenance in the best working environment with the highest
skilled and best trained personnel, which can best be achieved by
performing maintenance in conjunction with the 92-day periodic
inspection.
Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of an
application shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which the
protest is made, and include a concise statement of the interest of the
party in the proceeding. Additionally, one copy of the protest shall be
furnished to the applicant at the address listed above.
All communications concerning this proceeding should be identified
by the docket number and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT
Central Docket Management Facility, Room PI-401, 400 7th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Communications received within 45 days of
the date of this notice will be considered by the FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after that date will be considered
as far as practicable. All written communications concerning these
proceedings are available for examination during regular business hours
(9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the above facility. All documents in the public
docket are also available for inspection and copying on the Internet at
the docket facility's Web site at https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA wishes to inform all potential commenters that anyone is able
to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
FRA expects to be able to determine these matters without an oral
hearing. However, if a specific request for an oral hearing is
accompanied by a showing that the party is unable to adequately present
his or her position by written statements, an application may be set
for public hearing.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 19, 2006.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E6-9970 Filed 6-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P