Klamath National Forest, California, Westpoint, 36056-36058 [06-5628]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
36056
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 121 / Friday, June 23, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
whether food has been processed using
good manufacturing practices.
Appointments to the Committee will
be made by the Secretary of Agriculture
after consultation with the Secretary of
Health and Human Services to ensure
that recommendations made by the
Committee take into account the needs
of the diverse groups served by the
Department. Membership shall include,
to the extent practicable, individuals
with demonstrated ability to represent
minorities, women, and persons with
disabilities.
Given the complexity of issues, the
full Committee expects to meet at least
twice yearly, and the meetings will be
announced in the Federal Register. The
subcommittees will meet as deemed
necessary by the chairperson and will
be held as working group meetings in an
open public forum. The subcommittee
meetings will not be announced in the
Federal Register. FSIS will announce
the agenda and subcommittee working
group meetings through the Constituent
Update, available on-line at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/News_&_Events/
2006_Constituent_Update/index.asp.
NACMCF holds subcommittee working
group meetings in order to accomplish
the work of the NACMCF; all work
accomplished by the subcommittees is
reviewed and approved by the full
Committee during a public meeting of
the full Committee, as announced in the
Federal Register. The subcommittee
may invite technical experts to present
information for consideration by the
subcommittee. All data and records
available to the full Committee are
expected to be available to the public at
the time the full Committee reviews and
approves the work of the subcommittee.
Appointment to the Advisory
Committee is for a two-year term,
renewable for a total of three
consecutive terms. Members are
required to attend all meetings inperson as this is necessary for the
functioning of this advisory committee.
Members must be prepared to work
outside of scheduled Committee and
subcommittee meetings, and may be
required to assist in document
preparation. Committee members serve
on a voluntary basis; however, travel
reimbursement and per diem are
available.
Regarding Nominees Who Are Selected
All nominees who are selected must
submit a USDA Advisory Committee
Membership Background Information
form AD–755, available on-line at:
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/FSISForms/
AD–755.pdf.
As new appointees, SGEs must
complete the Office of Government
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
Ethics (OGE) 450 Confidential Financial
Disclosure Report, before rendering any
advice, or prior to their first meeting.
All members will be reviewed for
conflict of interest pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
208 in relation to specific NACMCF
work charges. Financial disclosure
updates will be required annually.
Members must report any changes in
financial holdings requiring additional
disclosure. OGE 450 forms are available
on-line at: https://www.usoge.gov/pages/
forms_pubs_otherdocs/fpo_files/forms/
fr450fill_04.pdf.
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of
rulemaking and policy development is
important. Consequently, in an effort to
ensure that minorities, women, and
persons with disabilities are aware of
this notice, FSIS will announce it online through the FSIS Web page located
at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations/
2006_Notices_Index/. FSIS also will
make copies of this Federal Register
publication available through the FSIS
Constituent Update, which is used to
provide information regarding FSIS
policies, procedures, regulations,
Federal Register notices, FSIS public
meetings, recalls and other types of
information that could affect or would
be of interest to constituents and
stakeholders. The update is
communicated via Listserv, a free
electronic mail subscription service for
industry, trade and farm groups,
consumer interest groups, allied health
professionals and other individuals who
have asked to be included. The update
is available on the FSIS Web page.
Through the Listserv and Web page,
FSIS is able to provide information to a
much broader and more diverse
audience. In addition, FSIS offers an email subscription service which
provides automatic and customized
access to selected food safety news and
information. This service is available at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
news_and_events/email_subscription/.
Options range from recalls to export
information to regulations, directives
and notices. Customers can add or
delete subscriptions themselves and
have the option to password protect
their account.
Done at Washington, DC, on: June 20, 2006.
Barbara J. Masters,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–9949 Filed 6–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Klamath National Forest, California,
Westpoint
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will
prepare an environmental impact
statement (the Westpoint Project) on a
proposal to treat vegetation using a
variety of silvicultural methods on
approximately 930 acres of National
Forest System lands in the Middle Creek
and Scott Bar Mountain areas about 12
miles west of the town of Fort Jones, in
Siskiyou County, California.
Approximately five miles of classified
roads are proposed for
decommissioning. Approximately two
miles of existing unclassified roads
would be added to the transportation
system. Activities would likely take
place within five years of the decision.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis should be received
within 30 days of the publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected by November 2006, and the
final environmental impact statement is
expected by March 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Ray Haupt, District Ranger, Scott River
Ranger District, 11263 N. Highway 3,
Fort Jones, CA 96032.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill
Bailey, Timber Management Officer, at
the above address or call (530) 463–
5351.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The Westpoint Project analysis area of
the Klamath National Forest consists of
two separate areas covering
approximately 10,900 acres. Both the
Scott River and the Siskiyou County
Highway 7F01 (Scott River Road) bisect
the analysis area into eastern and
western portions. The road and river, in
this corridor, are used extensively by
residents of the town of Scott Bar and
private homeowners along the river.
Forest recreation visitors use the road as
access to Indian Scotty Campground,
Jones Beach Day Use Area, and four
trailheads into the Marble Mountain
Wilderness.
Projects proposed for the entire
project area are intended to protect and
maintain three important landscape
conditions: (1) Northern spotted owl
habitat, (2) forest health, and
community safety near homes, and (3)
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 121 / Friday, June 23, 2006 / Notices
old forest structure in the wilderness
and late successional reserve. The
biggest threat to these important
landscape characteristics come from the
declining health of the forested
landscapes. This decline produces a
greater risk from stand-replacing events
associated with intense wildfire, insect
epidemics, and disease.
The area proposed for treatment is
adjacent to late successional reserves to
the north and west, and near the Marble
Mountain Wilderness area to the
northwest. Threats to older forest
structure and spotted owl habitat in the
Late Successional Reserves and
Wilderness, fish habitat in the river and
streams, and community safety near
homes come from the declining health
of the surrounding forested landscapes.
This decline produces a greater risk
from stand-replacing events associated
with intense wildfire, insect epidemics,
and disease. The risk of rapid fire
spread is generally uphill in this area
due to the very steep river canyons. The
most likely source of a human-caused
ignition is along the river corridor,
where homes, recreation, public utility
corridors, and public transportation are
concentrated at the bottom of this
drainage.
Natural fire cycles have been
prevented for 100 years in this area by
fire suppression activities. Without the
beneficial maintenance that these
natural low intensity fires provide,
actions such as stand-tending and
prescribed fire are now needed as a fire
replacement technique in the Westpoint
Project area to minimize the chance of
stand-replacing wildfires. Younger trees
and brush, now predominant on this
landscape, provide an abundant fuel
source, and a ‘‘fuel ladder’’ by which a
ground fire will climb into the tree
canopy and kill large fire-resistant trees,
and unnatural stand-replacing fire
situation. These fire entrapment
situations significantly increase the risk
to both firefighters and the public.
The purpose or objective of taking
action in the Westpoint Project area is:
• Improve forest health by returning
the vegetation densities on this
landscape to more natural historic
levels, protect surrounding areas of
older forest structure and owl habitat,
build more fire resilience into this
landscape, and provide wood and job
opportunities for local communities
through project activities.
• Reduce the occurrence or risk of
stand-replacing wildfire.
• Protect public safety and homes by
providing safe access for firefighters and
the public.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
36057
Proposed Action
Scoping Process
The Scott River District of the
Klamath National Forest proposes that
the Westpoint treats vegetation on
approximately 930 acres in the general
area of Middle Creek Watershed and
Scott Bar Mountain about 12 miles west
of the community of Fort Jones,
California. The vegetation treatment
would utilize a variety of silvicultural
prescriptions. Tractor, cable, and
helicopter logging methods would be
used, with cable as the predominant
method. Project-generated fuels would
be treated through a combination of
methods.
All Shasta red fir, white fir, and
hemlock stumps would be hand treated
with the fungicide Sporax to reduce
the spread of fungus Heterobasidion
annosum (Fomes annosus).
Openings created from group
selection and green tree retention
prescriptions would be planted and
baiting for pocket gophers. Baiting
application method would consist of
probing and/or spooning method of
below-ground application of strychnine.
There would be no new classified
road construction. Approximately five
miles of classified roads are proposed
for decommissioning in this project
design. About two miles of new
unclassified roads would be used, then
closed and hydrologically restored.
Around two miles of existing
unclassified roads would be upgraded
and added to the National Forest System
road system. About 12 miles of road are
proposed for maintenance level changes
(seasonal road closures).
The legal description for the proposal
is Township 44 North, Range 10 West,
Section 6; Township 44 North, Range 11
West, Section 1–18, 21–26, and 27;
Township 44 North, Range 12 West,
Sections 1 and 12; Township 45 North,
Range 11 West, Section 31; and
Township 45 North, Range 12 West,
Section 36, Mount Diablo Meridian. All
activities would likely be completed
within five years of the decision being
made.
In the winter of 2002, scoping for an
environmental assessment for a similar
project in the same analysis area was
initiated and included in the Klamath
National Forest’s Winter 2002 Schedule
of Proposed Actions, which was posted
on the Klamath National Forest’s
Internet Web site and mailed to
interested parties. In March 2002, a
scoping letter was sent to potentially
affected individuals and anyone who
expressed interest in the proposal. The
original decision was invalidated by
Judge Shubb in May 2005, with
direction to proceed with an
environmental impact statement. In the
spring of 2006, scoping for this
environmental impact statement was
initiated and included in the Spring
2006 Schedule of Proposed Actions and
posed on the Klamath National Forest’s
Internet Web site and mailed to
interested parties. This project is similar
to the previous proposal; however,
suggestions from the public helped to
define this proposal.
This Notice of Intent invites
additional public comment on this
proposal and initiated the preparation of
the environmental impact statement.
Due to the extensive scoping effects
already conducted, no scoping meeting
is planned. The public is encouraged to
take part in the planning process and to
visit with Forest Service officials at any
time during the analysis and prior to the
decision.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
The Forest Service must decide
whether it will implement this project;
implement an alternative that meets the
purpose and need; or not implement
any project at this time.
Responsible Official
Margaret Boland, Forest Supervisor,
USDA Forest Service, 1312 Fairlane
Road, Yreka, California 96097 is the
Responsible Official.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. While public
participation in this analysis is welcome
at any time, comments received within
30 days of the publication of this notice
will be especially useful in the
preparation of the draft environmental
impact statement. The scoping process
will include identifying potential issues,
significant issues to be analyzed in
depth, alternatives to the proposed
action, and potential environmental
effects of the proposal and alternatives.
The comment period on the draft
environmental impact statement will be
45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
36058
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 121 / Friday, June 23, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received in response to
this scoping notice as well as comments
received on the subsequent draft
environmental impact statement,
including the names and addresses of
those who comment, will be considered
part of the public record on this
proposal and will be available for public
inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: June 6, 2006.
Margaret J. Boland,
Forest Supervisor, Klamath National Forest.
[FR Doc. 06–5628 Filed 6–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Jun 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Ketchikan Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Ketchikan Resource
Advisory Committee will meet in
Ketchikan, Alaska, July 20, 2006 and
August 24, 2006. The purpose of these
meetings is to discuss potential projects
under the Secure Rural Schools and
Community Self-Determination Act of
2000.
The meetings will be held July
20, 2006 and August 24, 2006 at 6 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at
the Southeast Alaska Discovery Center
Learning Center (back entrance), 50
Main Street, Ketchikan, Alaska. Send
written comments to Ketchikan
Resource Advisory Committee, c/o
District Ranger, USDA Forest Service,
3031 Tongass Ave., Ketchikan, AK
99901, or electronically to
lkolund@fs.fed.us.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynn Kolund, District Ranger,
Ketchikan-Misty Fiords Ranger District,
Tongass National Forest, (907) 228–
4100.
The
meetings are open to the public.
Committee discussion is limited to
Forest Service staff and Committee
members. However, public input
opportunity will be provided and
individuals will have the opportunity to
address the Committee at that time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: June 15, 2006.
Forrest Cole,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06–5614 Filed 6–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Notice of Resource Advisory
Committee Meeting
Lassen Resource Advisory
Committee, Susanville, California,
USDA Forest Service.
ACTION: Notice of Meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in
the Federal Advisory Committees Act
(Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–
393) the Lassen National Forest’s Lassen
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
County Resource Advisory Committee
will meet Thursday July 13th and
Friday July 14th in Susanville,
California for a business meeting. The
meetings are open to the public.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
business meeting on July 13th and 14th
will begin at 9 a.m., at the Lassen
National Forest Headquarters Office,
Caribou Conference Room, 2550
Riverside Drive, Susanville, CA 96130.
This meeting will review June meeting
minutes; progress updates on the
following projects will be provided:
Archery Children’s Fuel Reduction;
Gooch Valley and Beaver Creek Range
Improvements; Bizz Johnson Trail
Stabilization; Swain Mountain
Trailhead; Diamond Mountain and
Willard Creek Road enhancement
projects. The remainder of the meeting
will be set aside to review and listen to
proposed projects for the final round of
funding through the ‘‘Secure Rural
Schools and Self Determination Act of
2000,’’ commonly known as Payments
to States. Time will also be set aside for
public comments at the beginning of the
meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Andrews, Designated Federal
Official at (530) 257–4188; or Public
Affairs Officer Heidi Perry at (530) 252–
6604.
Laurie Tippin,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06–5616 Filed 6–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Notice of Resource Advisory
Committee Meeting
Modoc Resource Advisory
Committee, Alturas, California, USDA
Forest Service.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in
the Federal Advisory Committees Act
(Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–
393) the Modoc National Forest’s Modoc
Resource Advisory Committee will meet
Monday, August 7, 2006 and August 28,
2006 in Alturas, California for business
meetings. The meetings are open to the
public.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
business meeting August 7 begins at 6
p.m., at the Modoc National Forest
Office, Conference Room, 800 West 12th
St., Alturas. Agenda topics will include
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 121 (Friday, June 23, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36056-36058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5628]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Klamath National Forest, California, Westpoint
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
statement (the Westpoint Project) on a proposal to treat vegetation
using a variety of silvicultural methods on approximately 930 acres of
National Forest System lands in the Middle Creek and Scott Bar Mountain
areas about 12 miles west of the town of Fort Jones, in Siskiyou
County, California. Approximately five miles of classified roads are
proposed for decommissioning. Approximately two miles of existing
unclassified roads would be added to the transportation system.
Activities would likely take place within five years of the decision.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received
within 30 days of the publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. The draft environmental impact statement is expected by
November 2006, and the final environmental impact statement is expected
by March 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Ray Haupt, District Ranger, Scott
River Ranger District, 11263 N. Highway 3, Fort Jones, CA 96032.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Bailey, Timber Management
Officer, at the above address or call (530) 463-5351.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The Westpoint Project analysis area of the Klamath National Forest
consists of two separate areas covering approximately 10,900 acres.
Both the Scott River and the Siskiyou County Highway 7F01 (Scott River
Road) bisect the analysis area into eastern and western portions. The
road and river, in this corridor, are used extensively by residents of
the town of Scott Bar and private homeowners along the river. Forest
recreation visitors use the road as access to Indian Scotty Campground,
Jones Beach Day Use Area, and four trailheads into the Marble Mountain
Wilderness.
Projects proposed for the entire project area are intended to
protect and maintain three important landscape conditions: (1) Northern
spotted owl habitat, (2) forest health, and community safety near
homes, and (3)
[[Page 36057]]
old forest structure in the wilderness and late successional reserve.
The biggest threat to these important landscape characteristics come
from the declining health of the forested landscapes. This decline
produces a greater risk from stand-replacing events associated with
intense wildfire, insect epidemics, and disease.
The area proposed for treatment is adjacent to late successional
reserves to the north and west, and near the Marble Mountain Wilderness
area to the northwest. Threats to older forest structure and spotted
owl habitat in the Late Successional Reserves and Wilderness, fish
habitat in the river and streams, and community safety near homes come
from the declining health of the surrounding forested landscapes. This
decline produces a greater risk from stand-replacing events associated
with intense wildfire, insect epidemics, and disease. The risk of rapid
fire spread is generally uphill in this area due to the very steep
river canyons. The most likely source of a human-caused ignition is
along the river corridor, where homes, recreation, public utility
corridors, and public transportation are concentrated at the bottom of
this drainage.
Natural fire cycles have been prevented for 100 years in this area
by fire suppression activities. Without the beneficial maintenance that
these natural low intensity fires provide, actions such as stand-
tending and prescribed fire are now needed as a fire replacement
technique in the Westpoint Project area to minimize the chance of
stand-replacing wildfires. Younger trees and brush, now predominant on
this landscape, provide an abundant fuel source, and a ``fuel ladder''
by which a ground fire will climb into the tree canopy and kill large
fire-resistant trees, and unnatural stand-replacing fire situation.
These fire entrapment situations significantly increase the risk to
both firefighters and the public.
The purpose or objective of taking action in the Westpoint Project
area is:
Improve forest health by returning the vegetation
densities on this landscape to more natural historic levels, protect
surrounding areas of older forest structure and owl habitat, build more
fire resilience into this landscape, and provide wood and job
opportunities for local communities through project activities.
Reduce the occurrence or risk of stand-replacing wildfire.
Protect public safety and homes by providing safe access
for firefighters and the public.
Proposed Action
The Scott River District of the Klamath National Forest proposes
that the Westpoint treats vegetation on approximately 930 acres in the
general area of Middle Creek Watershed and Scott Bar Mountain about 12
miles west of the community of Fort Jones, California. The vegetation
treatment would utilize a variety of silvicultural prescriptions.
Tractor, cable, and helicopter logging methods would be used, with
cable as the predominant method. Project-generated fuels would be
treated through a combination of methods.
All Shasta red fir, white fir, and hemlock stumps would be hand
treated with the fungicide Sporax[supreg] to reduce the spread of
fungus Heterobasidion annosum (Fomes annosus).
Openings created from group selection and green tree retention
prescriptions would be planted and baiting for pocket gophers. Baiting
application method would consist of probing and/or spooning method of
below-ground application of strychnine.
There would be no new classified road construction. Approximately
five miles of classified roads are proposed for decommissioning in this
project design. About two miles of new unclassified roads would be
used, then closed and hydrologically restored. Around two miles of
existing unclassified roads would be upgraded and added to the National
Forest System road system. About 12 miles of road are proposed for
maintenance level changes (seasonal road closures).
The legal description for the proposal is Township 44 North, Range
10 West, Section 6; Township 44 North, Range 11 West, Section 1-18, 21-
26, and 27; Township 44 North, Range 12 West, Sections 1 and 12;
Township 45 North, Range 11 West, Section 31; and Township 45 North,
Range 12 West, Section 36, Mount Diablo Meridian. All activities would
likely be completed within five years of the decision being made.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Service must decide whether it will implement this
project; implement an alternative that meets the purpose and need; or
not implement any project at this time.
Responsible Official
Margaret Boland, Forest Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, 1312
Fairlane Road, Yreka, California 96097 is the Responsible Official.
Scoping Process
In the winter of 2002, scoping for an environmental assessment for
a similar project in the same analysis area was initiated and included
in the Klamath National Forest's Winter 2002 Schedule of Proposed
Actions, which was posted on the Klamath National Forest's Internet Web
site and mailed to interested parties. In March 2002, a scoping letter
was sent to potentially affected individuals and anyone who expressed
interest in the proposal. The original decision was invalidated by
Judge Shubb in May 2005, with direction to proceed with an
environmental impact statement. In the spring of 2006, scoping for this
environmental impact statement was initiated and included in the Spring
2006 Schedule of Proposed Actions and posed on the Klamath National
Forest's Internet Web site and mailed to interested parties. This
project is similar to the previous proposal; however, suggestions from
the public helped to define this proposal.
This Notice of Intent invites additional public comment on this
proposal and initiated the preparation of the environmental impact
statement. Due to the extensive scoping effects already conducted, no
scoping meeting is planned. The public is encouraged to take part in
the planning process and to visit with Forest Service officials at any
time during the analysis and prior to the decision.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. While public
participation in this analysis is welcome at any time, comments
received within 30 days of the publication of this notice will be
especially useful in the preparation of the draft environmental impact
statement. The scoping process will include identifying potential
issues, significant issues to be analyzed in depth, alternatives to the
proposed action, and potential environmental effects of the proposal
and alternatives.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement will
be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes
the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings
[[Page 36058]]
related to public participation in the environmental review process.
First, reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must
structure their participation in the environmental review of the
proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that
could be raised at the draft environmental impact statement stage but
that are not raised until after completion of the final environmental
impact statement may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of
Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980).
Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action participate by the close of the 45-
day comment period so that substantive comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully
consider them and respond to them in the final environmental impact
statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received in response to this scoping notice as well as
comments received on the subsequent draft environmental impact
statement, including the names and addresses of those who comment, will
be considered part of the public record on this proposal and will be
available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: June 6, 2006.
Margaret J. Boland,
Forest Supervisor, Klamath National Forest.
[FR Doc. 06-5628 Filed 6-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
