Safety Zone; Patapsco River, Northwest and Inner Harbors, Baltimore, MD, 35854-35856 [E6-9865]
Download as PDF
35854
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 120 / Thursday, June 22, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); § 117.255 also issued under
authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106 Stat. 5039.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
2. In § 117.313 revise paragraphs (a)
and (b) and add paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
33 CFR Part 165
§ 117.313
RIN 1625–AA00
New River.
(a) The draw of the S.E. Third Avenue
Bridge, mile 1.4 at Fort Lauderdale shall
open on signal; except that, from 7:30
a.m. to 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays, the draw need not be opened
for the passage of vessels. Public vessels
of the United States, regularly
scheduled cruise vessels, tugs with
tows, and vessels in distress shall be
passed as necessary.
(b) The draw of the Andrews Avenue
Bridge, mile 2.3 at Fort Lauderdale,
shall open on signal; except that, from
7:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 6
p.m. Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays, the draw need not be
opened for the passage of vessels. The
draw need not be opened for inbound
vessels when the draw of the Florida
East Coast railroad bridge, mile 2.5 at
Fort Lauderdale is in the closed position
for the passage of a train.
(c) The draw of the Marshal (Seventh
Avenue) bridge, mile 2.7 at Fort
Lauderdale shall open on signal; except
that, from 7:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 4:30
p.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, the draw need
not be opened for the passage of vessels.
Public vessels of the United States,
regularly scheduled cruise vessels, tugs
with tows, and vessels in distress shall
be passed as necessary
3. In § 117.315 revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
§ 117.315
New River, South Fork.
(a) The draw of the Davie Boulevard
(S.W. Twelfth Street) bridge, mile 0.9 at
Fort Lauderdale shall open on signal;
except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. and
4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays, the
draw need not be opened for the passage
of vessels. Public vessels of the United
States, regularly scheduled cruise
vessels, tugs with tows, and vessels in
distress shall be passed as necessary.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 12, 2006.
D.W. Kunkel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 06–5576 Filed 6–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Jun 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
[CGD05–06–062]
Safety Zone; Patapsco River,
Northwest and Inner Harbors,
Baltimore, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone upon
certain waters of the Patapsco River,
Northwest Harbor, and Inner Harbor
during the movement of the historic
sloop-of-war USS CONSTELLATION.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters
during the tow of the vessel from its
berth at the Inner Harbor in Baltimore,
Maryland, to a point on the Patapsco
River near the Fort McHenry National
Monument and Historic Shrine in
Baltimore, Maryland, and return. This
action will restrict vessel traffic in
portions of the Patapsco River,
Northwest Harbor, and Inner Harbor
during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
August 7, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401
Hawkins Point Road, Building 70,
Waterways Management Division,
Baltimore, Maryland, 21226–1791. Coast
Guard Sector Baltimore, Waterways
Management Division, maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at Commander,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401
Hawkins Point Road, Building 70,
Waterways Management Division,
Baltimore, Maryland 21226–1791,
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ronald Houck, at Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, Waterways Management
Division, at telephone number (410)
576–2674 or (410) 576–2693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD05–06–062),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Waterways
Management Division, at the address
under ADDRESSES explaining why one
would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The USS CONSTELLATION Museum
is planning to conduct a ‘‘turn-around’’
ceremony involving the sloop-of-war
USS CONSTELLATION in Baltimore,
Maryland on Friday, September 8, 2006.
Planned events include a three-hour,
round-trip tow of the USS
CONSTELLATION in the Port of
Baltimore, with an onboard salute with
navy pattern cannon while the historic
vessel is positioned off Fort McHenry
National Monument and Historic Site.
The historic Sloop-of-War USS
CONSTELLATION will be towed ‘‘dead
ship,’’ which means that the vessel will
be underway without the benefit of
mechanical or sail propulsion. The
return dead ship tow of the USS
CONSTELLATION to its berth in the
Inner Harbor is expected to occur
immediately upon execution of a tugassisted turn-around of the USS
CONSTELLATION on the Patapsco
River near Fort McHenry. The Coast
Guard anticipates a large recreational
boating fleet during this event,
scheduled on a late Friday afternoon
during the summer in Baltimore,
Maryland. Operators should expect
significant vessel congestion along the
planned route.
The purpose of this rule is to promote
maritime safety and protect participants
and the boating public in the Port of
Baltimore immediately prior to, during,
and after the scheduled event. The rule
will provide for a clear transit route for
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 120 / Thursday, June 22, 2006 / Proposed Rules
the participating vessels, and provide a
safety buffer around the participating
vessels while they are in transit. The
rule will impact the movement of all
vessels operating upon certain waters of
the Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor
and Inner Harbor.
mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The historic sloop-of-war USS
CONSTELLATION is scheduled to be
towed ‘‘dead ship’’ on September 8,
2006. The USS CONSTELLATION is
scheduled to be towed from its berth at
Pier 1 in Baltimore’s Inner Harbor to a
point on the Patapsco River near Fort
McHenry National Monument and
Historic Shrine, Baltimore, Maryland, to
take place along a one-way, planned
route of approximately four nautical
miles, that includes specified waters of
the Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor
and Inner Harbor. After being turnedaround, the USS CONSTELLATION will
be returned to its original berth at Pier
1, Inner Harbor, Baltimore, Maryland.
The safety of dead ship tow
participants requires that persons and
vessels be kept at a safe distance from
the intended route during this
evolution. The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary moving safety
zone around the USS CONSTELLATION
dead ship tow participants on
September 8, 2006, to ensure the safety
of participants and spectators
immediately prior to, during, and
following the dead ship tow.
Interference with normal port
operations will be kept to the minimum
considered necessary to ensure the
safety of life on the navigable waters
immediately before, during, and after
the scheduled event.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Jun 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to
operate, remain or anchor within certain
waters of the Patapsco River, Northwest
Harbor and Inner Harbor, in Baltimore,
Maryland, from 2 p.m. through 7 p.m.
on September 8, 2006. Because the zone
is of limited size and duration, it is
expected that there will be minimal
disruption to the maritime community.
Before the effective period, the Coast
Guard will issue maritime advisories
widely available to users of the river
and harbors to allow mariners to make
alternative plans for transiting the
affected areas. In addition, smaller
vessels not constrained by their draft,
which are more likely to be small
entities, may transit around the safety
zone.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Federalism
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
35855
Protection of Children
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
35856
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 120 / Thursday, June 22, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, we believe that
this rule should be categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule
establishes a safety zone.
A preliminary ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ is available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. Comments on this section
will be considered before we make the
final decision on whether this rule
should be categorically excluded from
further environmental review.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Jun 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Public
Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–062 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T05–062 Safety Zone; Patapsco
River, Northwest and Inner Harbors,
Baltimore, MD.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of
this section:
(1) Captain of the Port, Baltimore,
Maryland means the Commander, Coast
Guard Sector Baltimore or any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland
to act on his or her behalf.
(2) USS CONSTELLATION ‘‘turnaround’’ participants means the USS
CONSTELLATION, its support craft and
the accompanying towing vessels.
(b) Location. The following area is a
moving safety zone: all waters within
200 yards ahead of or 100 yards
outboard or aft of the historic Sloop-ofWar USS CONSTELLATION, surface to
bottom, while operating in the Inner
Harbor, the Northwest Harbor and the
Patapsco River.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations governing safety zones,
found in Sec. 165.23, apply to the safety
zone described in paragraph (b) of this
section.
(2) With the exception of USS
CONSTELLATION ‘‘turn-around’’
participants, entry into or remaining in
this zone is prohibited, unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Baltimore, Maryland.
(3) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through the moving
safety zone must first request
authorization from the Captain of the
Port, Baltimore, Maryland to seek
permission to transit the area. The
Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland
can be contacted at telephone number
(410) 576–2693. The Coast Guard
vessels enforcing this section can be
contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF
Channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon being
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other
means, the person or vessel shall
proceed as directed. If permission is
granted, all persons or vessels must
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port, Baltimore,
Maryland, and proceed at the minimum
speed necessary to maintain a safe
course while within the zone.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State and local agencies.
(e) Effective period. This section will
be enforced from 2 p.m. through 7 p.m.
local time on September 8, 2006.
Dated: June 7, 2006.
Brian D. Kelley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. E6–9865 Filed 6–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2006–0376–200611b; FRL–
8186–9]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans Alabama: Open
Burning Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to
the Alabama State Implementation Plan
(SIP), submitted by the Alabama
Department of Environmental
Management (ADEM) on March 9, 2006.
The revisions include modifications to
Alabama’s open burning rules found at
Alabama Administrative Code (AAC)
Chapter 335–3–3–.01. These revisions
are part of Alabama’s strategy to meet
the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) for fine particulates
(PM2.5) and ozone. Open burning
creates smoke that contains fine
particles, volatile organic compounds
and nitrogen oxides, precursors to
ozone. ADEM has found that elevated
levels of PM2.5 mirror the months when
ozone levels are highest (May–
September), and that PM2.5 levels
remain elevated into October. These
rules are intended to help control levels
of PM2.5 and ozone precursors that
contribute to high ozone and PM2.5
levels. This action is being taken
pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
In the Rules Section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving Alabama’s
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 120 (Thursday, June 22, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35854-35856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-9865]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05-06-062]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Patapsco River, Northwest and Inner Harbors,
Baltimore, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
upon certain waters of the Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor, and Inner
Harbor during the movement of the historic sloop-of-war USS
CONSTELLATION. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of
life on navigable waters during the tow of the vessel from its berth at
the Inner Harbor in Baltimore, Maryland, to a point on the Patapsco
River near the Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine in
Baltimore, Maryland, and return. This action will restrict vessel
traffic in portions of the Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor, and Inner
Harbor during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before August 7, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, Building
70, Waterways Management Division, Baltimore, Maryland, 21226-1791.
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, Waterways Management Division, maintains
the public docket for this rulemaking. Comments and material received
from the public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, will become part of this docket and will
be available for inspection or copying at Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, Building 70, Waterways
Management Division, Baltimore, Maryland 21226-1791, between 8 a.m. and
3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ronald Houck, at Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Waterways Management Division, at telephone number
(410) 576-2674 or (410) 576-2693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD05-06-
062), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to Coast Guard Sector Baltimore,
Waterways Management Division, at the address under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would
aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The USS CONSTELLATION Museum is planning to conduct a ``turn-
around'' ceremony involving the sloop-of-war USS CONSTELLATION in
Baltimore, Maryland on Friday, September 8, 2006. Planned events
include a three-hour, round-trip tow of the USS CONSTELLATION in the
Port of Baltimore, with an onboard salute with navy pattern cannon
while the historic vessel is positioned off Fort McHenry National
Monument and Historic Site. The historic Sloop-of-War USS CONSTELLATION
will be towed ``dead ship,'' which means that the vessel will be
underway without the benefit of mechanical or sail propulsion. The
return dead ship tow of the USS CONSTELLATION to its berth in the Inner
Harbor is expected to occur immediately upon execution of a tug-
assisted turn-around of the USS CONSTELLATION on the Patapsco River
near Fort McHenry. The Coast Guard anticipates a large recreational
boating fleet during this event, scheduled on a late Friday afternoon
during the summer in Baltimore, Maryland. Operators should expect
significant vessel congestion along the planned route.
The purpose of this rule is to promote maritime safety and protect
participants and the boating public in the Port of Baltimore
immediately prior to, during, and after the scheduled event. The rule
will provide for a clear transit route for
[[Page 35855]]
the participating vessels, and provide a safety buffer around the
participating vessels while they are in transit. The rule will impact
the movement of all vessels operating upon certain waters of the
Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor and Inner Harbor.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The historic sloop-of-war USS CONSTELLATION is scheduled to be
towed ``dead ship'' on September 8, 2006. The USS CONSTELLATION is
scheduled to be towed from its berth at Pier 1 in Baltimore's Inner
Harbor to a point on the Patapsco River near Fort McHenry National
Monument and Historic Shrine, Baltimore, Maryland, to take place along
a one-way, planned route of approximately four nautical miles, that
includes specified waters of the Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor and
Inner Harbor. After being turned-around, the USS CONSTELLATION will be
returned to its original berth at Pier 1, Inner Harbor, Baltimore,
Maryland.
The safety of dead ship tow participants requires that persons and
vessels be kept at a safe distance from the intended route during this
evolution. The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary moving
safety zone around the USS CONSTELLATION dead ship tow participants on
September 8, 2006, to ensure the safety of participants and spectators
immediately prior to, during, and following the dead ship tow.
Interference with normal port operations will be kept to the minimum
considered necessary to ensure the safety of life on the navigable
waters immediately before, during, and after the scheduled event.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to operate, remain or anchor within
certain waters of the Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor and Inner
Harbor, in Baltimore, Maryland, from 2 p.m. through 7 p.m. on September
8, 2006. Because the zone is of limited size and duration, it is
expected that there will be minimal disruption to the maritime
community. Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will issue
maritime advisories widely available to users of the river and harbors
to allow mariners to make alternative plans for transiting the affected
areas. In addition, smaller vessels not constrained by their draft,
which are more likely to be small entities, may transit around the
safety zone.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
[[Page 35856]]
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that there are no factors in this
case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should
be categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation. This rule
establishes a safety zone.
A preliminary ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' is available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. Comments on this section
will be considered before we make the final decision on whether this
rule should be categorically excluded from further environmental
review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public
Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-062 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-062 Safety Zone; Patapsco River, Northwest and Inner
Harbors, Baltimore, MD.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section:
(1) Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland means the Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore or any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant,
or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Baltimore, Maryland to act on his or her behalf.
(2) USS CONSTELLATION ``turn-around'' participants means the USS
CONSTELLATION, its support craft and the accompanying towing vessels.
(b) Location. The following area is a moving safety zone: all
waters within 200 yards ahead of or 100 yards outboard or aft of the
historic Sloop-of-War USS CONSTELLATION, surface to bottom, while
operating in the Inner Harbor, the Northwest Harbor and the Patapsco
River.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations governing safety
zones, found in Sec. 165.23, apply to the safety zone described in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) With the exception of USS CONSTELLATION ``turn-around''
participants, entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited,
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
(3) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the
moving safety zone must first request authorization from the Captain of
the Port, Baltimore, Maryland to seek permission to transit the area.
The Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland can be contacted at
telephone number (410) 576-2693. The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this
section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF Channel 16 (156.8
MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the person or vessel shall proceed as
directed. If permission is granted, all persons or vessels must comply
with the instructions of the Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland,
and proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course
while within the zone.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State and local agencies.
(e) Effective period. This section will be enforced from 2 p.m.
through 7 p.m. local time on September 8, 2006.
Dated: June 7, 2006.
Brian D. Kelley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. E6-9865 Filed 6-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P