Plumas National Forest, Feather River Ranger District, CA; Sugarberry Project, 35607-35608 [06-5546]
Download as PDF
35607
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 119
Wednesday, June 21, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Plumas National Forest, Feather River
Ranger District, CA; Sugarberry
Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will
prepare an environmental impact
statement to disclose the environmental
effects resulting from construction of
fuel breaks known as defensible fuel
profile zones (DFPZs); harvest and
reforestation of timber stands;
enhancement of black oak and aspen
stands; improvement of aquatic and
wildlife habitat; underburning rare
plants occurrences; and road
construction, reconstruction, and
decommissioning.
Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received within
30 days of the publication of this notice
in the Federal Register. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected by December 2006, and the
final environmental impact statement is
expected by April 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
˜
James M Pena, Forest Supervisor,
Plumas National Forest, P.O. Box 11500,
159 Lawrence Street, Quincy, CA
95971–6025. Comments may be (1)
mailed to the Responsible Official; (2)
hand-delivered between the hours of 8
a.m.–4;30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays; (3) faxed to (530)
283–7746; or (4) electronically mailed
to: comments-pacificsouthwestplumas@fs.fed.us.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Joyce, Project Leader, Feather
River District, 875 Mitchell Avenue,
Oroville, CA 95965, or call (530) 534–
6500.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Jun 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
The
Sugarberry Project area is located within
the Feather River Danger District of the
Plumas National Forest in Yuba, Sierra
and Plumas Counties. Encompassing
approximately 45,000 acres, the project
area is located south and east of Little
Grass Valley Reservoir, from Gibsonville
Ridge in the north to the North Yuba
River in the south. Treatment units
range in elevation from 2,400 to 6,500
feet above sea level. Communities in
and near the project area include
Clipper Mills, Strawberry Valley, and La
Porte.
The Sugarberry Project is proposed as
part of a broad resource management
program to promote the ecological
health of lands and economic health
and stability of communities in the
northern Sierra Nevada under the
authority of the Herger-Feinstein
Quincy Library Group Forest Recovery
Act (HFQLG Act).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The Forest Service has identified the
following project objectives: (1) Protect
rural communities and forest
ecosystems from high-intensity
wildfires; (2) promote a healthy all-aged,
multistoried, fire-resilient forest; (3)
contribute to the stability and economic
health of rural communities; (4)
promote the health of unique plant
communities; and (5) promote healthy
aquatic and riparian ecosystems.
Proposed Action
To achieve project objectives, the
Forest Service proposes to construct
approximately 2,100 acres of fuelbreaks
known as Defensible Fuel Profile Zones
(DFPZ). A DFPZ is a strategically
located strip of land approximately 1⁄4
mile in width on which fuels, both
living and dead, have been modified in
order to reduce the potential for
sustained crown fire and to allow fire
suppression personnel a safer location
from which to take action against a
wildfire. The DFPZs in the Sugarberry
Project would be part of a larger,
strategic system of DFPZs on the Plumas
National Forest, adjacent private lands,
and other national forests.
Proposed DFPZs are located primarily
on ridges with tree crowns spaced at a
distance that reduces the potential for
crown fire spread (generally 40 percent
canopy cover). DFPZs would be
constructed through mechanical
thinning and biomass removal on
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
approximately 400 acres, mastication on
approximately 300 acres, underburning
on approximately 1,400 acres, and hand
cutting, piling, and burning on
approximately 40 acres.
The Forest Service proposes to
harvest approximately 30 million board
feet of timber from group selection units
(1,300 acres), individual tree selection
units (300 acres), and DFPZ mechanical
thinning units (400 acres). Group
selection involves harvest of trees less
than 30-inches in diameter from small
(one-half to two acres) groups. Over
time, this would create an uneven-aged
(all-aged) forests made up of a
patchwork of small groups of same-aged
trees. Individual tree selection harvest
would combine removal of diseased or
otherwise unhealthy trees with thinning
from below to improve forest health and
favor fire resilient tree species. Existing
and temporary roads would be needed
to access timber and DFPZ treatment
areas. An estimated 27 miles of existing
road would be reconstructed with 3
additional miles of new classified road
construction and 12 miles of new
temporary spur construction. Another
estimated 5 miles of road, no longer in
use or needed, would be
decommissioned or closed by various
methods, such as ripping and seeding,
re-contouring, and installing barriers.
Projects that promote the health of
unique plant communities include
enhancement of approximately 100
acres of black oak stands and 20 acres
of aspen stands, along with
underburning occurrences of the rare
clustered lady’s slipper on 5–10 acres
and monitoring results.
Aquatic and riparian restoration
projects include restoring and
enhancing aquatic, native plant, and
riparian habitat by replacing or
upgrading six culverts; restoring
meadows; stabilizing stream channels
and banks; and constructing one
sediment settling pond.
Responsible Official
˜
James M. Pena, Forest Supervisor,
P.O. Box 11500, 159 Lawrence Street,
Quincy, CA 95971–6025 is the
Responsible Official.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Responsible Official will decide
whether to implement this proposal, an
alternative design that moves the project
area towards the desired condition, or
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
35608
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 21, 2006 / Notices
not to implement any project at this
time.
Scoping Process
Public questions and comments
regarding this proposal are an integral
part of this environmental analysis
process. Comments will be used to
identify issues and develop alternatives
to the proposed action. To assist the
Forest Service in identifying and
considering issues and concerns related
to the proposed actions, comments
should be as specific as possible.
Information about the proposed action
will be mailed to adjacent landowners,
as well as to those people and
organizations that have indicated a
specific interest in the project, to Native
American entities, and Federal, state,
and local agencies. The public will be
notified of any meetings regarding this
proposal by mailings and press releases
sent to local newspaper and media. A
meeting in a community in the project
area is planned for July 2006, although
specific information is not available at
this time.
Preliminary Issues
The following preliminary issues have
been identified for this proposal: (a)
Impacts from ground disturbing
activities within watersheds that may be
approaching or over the threshold of
concern, (b) potential impacts on soil
productivity and soil hydrologic
function of erodible or easily compacted
soils, (c) economic feasibility of the
project due to high treatment and
regeneration costs, and (d) alteration of
habitat components utilized by the
California spotted owl, e.g., canopy
cover and medium to large trees.
Continued analysis will determine the
relevance of preliminary issues.
Additional issues may be identified
during the scoping process.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Permits or Licenses Required
No Federal permits, licenses, or
entitlements are necessary to implement
the proposed project. State
requirements, based on Federal laws,
and administered by the County
Agricultural Commissioner for air
quality management will be followed.
These requirements include burning
only on permissive burn days or
receiving a special variance prior to
ignition. Smoke permits are required
from the Northern Sierra and Feather
River Air Quality Management Districts
(AQMD) prior to any understory or pile
burning. Timber Harvest Activity
Waivers are required from the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Jun 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping proces which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. The public is
encouraged to take part in the process
and is encouraged to visit with Forest
Service officials at any time during the
analysis and prior to the decision. The
Forest Service will be seeking
information, comments, and assistance
from Federal, State, and local agencies
and other individuals or organizations
that may be interested in, or affected by,
the proposed vegetation management
activities.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
theser court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45
day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and disucssed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: June 14, 2006.
Michael Condon,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06–5546 Filed 6–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce (DOC)
has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance the following proposal for
collection of information under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Agency: Bureau of Economic Analysis
(BEA), Commerce.
Title: Quarterly Survey of Financial
Services Transactions Between U.S.
Financial Services Providers and
Unaffiliated Foreign Persons.
Form Number(s): BE–85.
Agency Approval Number: 0608–
0065.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Burden: 5,000 hours.
Number of Respondents: 125 per
quarter, 500 annually.
Average Hours Per Response: 10
hours.
Needs and Uses: The BE–85,
Quarterly Survey of Financial Services
Transactions Between U.S. Financial
Services Providers and Unaffiliated
Foreign Persons, obtains quarterly data
from financial services providers that
have receipts from or payments to
unaffiliated foreign persons in the
financial services covered by the survey.
The data are needed to monitor trade in
financial services, analyze its impact on
the U.S. and foreign economies, compile
and improve the U.S. economic
accounts, support U.S. commercial
policy on financial services, conduct
trade promotion, and improve the
ability of U.S. businesses to identify and
evaluate market opportunities.
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35607-35608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5546]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 21, 2006 /
Notices
[[Page 35607]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Plumas National Forest, Feather River Ranger District, CA;
Sugarberry Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
statement to disclose the environmental effects resulting from
construction of fuel breaks known as defensible fuel profile zones
(DFPZs); harvest and reforestation of timber stands; enhancement of
black oak and aspen stands; improvement of aquatic and wildlife
habitat; underburning rare plants occurrences; and road construction,
reconstruction, and decommissioning.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
within 30 days of the publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. The draft environmental impact statement is expected by
December 2006, and the final environmental impact statement is expected
by April 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to James M Pe[ntilde]a, Forest
Supervisor, Plumas National Forest, P.O. Box 11500, 159 Lawrence
Street, Quincy, CA 95971-6025. Comments may be (1) mailed to the
Responsible Official; (2) hand-delivered between the hours of 8 a.m.-
4;30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays; (3) faxed to
(530) 283-7746; or (4) electronically mailed to: comments-
pacificsouthwest-plumas@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Joyce, Project Leader, Feather
River District, 875 Mitchell Avenue, Oroville, CA 95965, or call (530)
534-6500.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Sugarberry Project area is located
within the Feather River Danger District of the Plumas National Forest
in Yuba, Sierra and Plumas Counties. Encompassing approximately 45,000
acres, the project area is located south and east of Little Grass
Valley Reservoir, from Gibsonville Ridge in the north to the North Yuba
River in the south. Treatment units range in elevation from 2,400 to
6,500 feet above sea level. Communities in and near the project area
include Clipper Mills, Strawberry Valley, and La Porte.
The Sugarberry Project is proposed as part of a broad resource
management program to promote the ecological health of lands and
economic health and stability of communities in the northern Sierra
Nevada under the authority of the Herger-Feinstein Quincy Library Group
Forest Recovery Act (HFQLG Act).
Purpose and Need for Action
The Forest Service has identified the following project objectives:
(1) Protect rural communities and forest ecosystems from high-intensity
wildfires; (2) promote a healthy all-aged, multistoried, fire-resilient
forest; (3) contribute to the stability and economic health of rural
communities; (4) promote the health of unique plant communities; and
(5) promote healthy aquatic and riparian ecosystems.
Proposed Action
To achieve project objectives, the Forest Service proposes to
construct approximately 2,100 acres of fuelbreaks known as Defensible
Fuel Profile Zones (DFPZ). A DFPZ is a strategically located strip of
land approximately \1/4\ mile in width on which fuels, both living and
dead, have been modified in order to reduce the potential for sustained
crown fire and to allow fire suppression personnel a safer location
from which to take action against a wildfire. The DFPZs in the
Sugarberry Project would be part of a larger, strategic system of DFPZs
on the Plumas National Forest, adjacent private lands, and other
national forests.
Proposed DFPZs are located primarily on ridges with tree crowns
spaced at a distance that reduces the potential for crown fire spread
(generally 40 percent canopy cover). DFPZs would be constructed through
mechanical thinning and biomass removal on approximately 400 acres,
mastication on approximately 300 acres, underburning on approximately
1,400 acres, and hand cutting, piling, and burning on approximately 40
acres.
The Forest Service proposes to harvest approximately 30 million
board feet of timber from group selection units (1,300 acres),
individual tree selection units (300 acres), and DFPZ mechanical
thinning units (400 acres). Group selection involves harvest of trees
less than 30-inches in diameter from small (one-half to two acres)
groups. Over time, this would create an uneven-aged (all-aged) forests
made up of a patchwork of small groups of same-aged trees. Individual
tree selection harvest would combine removal of diseased or otherwise
unhealthy trees with thinning from below to improve forest health and
favor fire resilient tree species. Existing and temporary roads would
be needed to access timber and DFPZ treatment areas. An estimated 27
miles of existing road would be reconstructed with 3 additional miles
of new classified road construction and 12 miles of new temporary spur
construction. Another estimated 5 miles of road, no longer in use or
needed, would be decommissioned or closed by various methods, such as
ripping and seeding, re-contouring, and installing barriers. Projects
that promote the health of unique plant communities include enhancement
of approximately 100 acres of black oak stands and 20 acres of aspen
stands, along with underburning occurrences of the rare clustered
lady's slipper on 5-10 acres and monitoring results.
Aquatic and riparian restoration projects include restoring and
enhancing aquatic, native plant, and riparian habitat by replacing or
upgrading six culverts; restoring meadows; stabilizing stream channels
and banks; and constructing one sediment settling pond.
Responsible Official
James M. Pe[ntilde]a, Forest Supervisor, P.O. Box 11500, 159
Lawrence Street, Quincy, CA 95971-6025 is the Responsible Official.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Responsible Official will decide whether to implement this
proposal, an alternative design that moves the project area towards the
desired condition, or
[[Page 35608]]
not to implement any project at this time.
Scoping Process
Public questions and comments regarding this proposal are an
integral part of this environmental analysis process. Comments will be
used to identify issues and develop alternatives to the proposed
action. To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering
issues and concerns related to the proposed actions, comments should be
as specific as possible.
Information about the proposed action will be mailed to adjacent
landowners, as well as to those people and organizations that have
indicated a specific interest in the project, to Native American
entities, and Federal, state, and local agencies. The public will be
notified of any meetings regarding this proposal by mailings and press
releases sent to local newspaper and media. A meeting in a community in
the project area is planned for July 2006, although specific
information is not available at this time.
Preliminary Issues
The following preliminary issues have been identified for this
proposal: (a) Impacts from ground disturbing activities within
watersheds that may be approaching or over the threshold of concern,
(b) potential impacts on soil productivity and soil hydrologic function
of erodible or easily compacted soils, (c) economic feasibility of the
project due to high treatment and regeneration costs, and (d)
alteration of habitat components utilized by the California spotted
owl, e.g., canopy cover and medium to large trees. Continued analysis
will determine the relevance of preliminary issues. Additional issues
may be identified during the scoping process.
Permits or Licenses Required
No Federal permits, licenses, or entitlements are necessary to
implement the proposed project. State requirements, based on Federal
laws, and administered by the County Agricultural Commissioner for air
quality management will be followed. These requirements include burning
only on permissive burn days or receiving a special variance prior to
ignition. Smoke permits are required from the Northern Sierra and
Feather River Air Quality Management Districts (AQMD) prior to any
understory or pile burning. Timber Harvest Activity Waivers are
required from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the scoping proces which guides the
development of the environmental impact statement. The public is
encouraged to take part in the process and is encouraged to visit with
Forest Service officials at any time during the analysis and prior to
the decision. The Forest Service will be seeking information, comments,
and assistance from Federal, State, and local agencies and other
individuals or organizations that may be interested in, or affected by,
the proposed vegetation management activities.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal
Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of theser court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45 day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and disucssed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: June 14, 2006.
Michael Condon,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06-5546 Filed 6-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M