Office of Thrift Supervision, 35325-35335 [06-5492]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices
Federal holidays. The DMS is available
24 hours each day, 365 days each year.
If you want acknowledgment that we
received your comments, please include
a self-addressed, stamped envelope or
postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting
comments on-line.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or of the person signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the Department of
Transportation’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477). This information is also
available at https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Chief, Physical
Qualifications Division, (202) 366–4001,
maggi.gunnels@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001. Office hours are from 8:30
a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Background
FMCSA estimates that there are
approximately 4 to 5 million active
interstate drivers subject to FMCSA’s
medical standards. Interstate CMV
drivers are required to have a medical
examination every two years at a
minimum or more frequently at the
discretion of the medical examiner. A
medical certificate is typically valid for
two years after the date of examination,
so it is estimated that a minimum of 2
to 3 million medical examinations are
conducted each year. In the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU) (Pub. L. 109–59,
119 Stat. 1144; August 10, 2005)
Congress supports comprehensive
improvements in the FMCSA medical
program, including improving the
quality of the interstate CMV driver
physical qualification examination.
There has been no research to date that
captures the decisionmaking and
performance of MEs who determine the
physical qualifications of CMV drivers
operating throughout the United States.
In addition, there has been no
systematic consideration of ME
perceptions of difficulties or
uncertainties associated with the
examination process.
A Working Integrated Product Team
(WIPT) of ME peers experienced in
conducting CMV driver physical
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jun 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
qualification examinations will review
the methodology and materials for the
study, and data gained from 150 direct
observations of physical examinations
of CMV drivers. Results of the Medical
Examiner Performance Study would
ultimately be used to develop
recommendations for improving the
overall physical qualification process
and achieve FMCSA’s goals of reducing
crash rates, injuries, and fatalities
involving large trucks and buses.
This initiative is independent from
the earlier National Registry of Certified
Medical Examiner survey announced
September 29, 2005 (70 FR 56964), the
primary intent of which is to identify
those tasks most critical to competent
job performance via a role delineation
study.
Respondents: Medical examiners
(such as medical doctors, doctors of
osteopathy, doctors of chiropractic,
physician assistants, and advanced
practice nurses) who are currently
performing FMCSA physical
examinations of CMV drivers.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: Survey—the estimated
average burden per response for each
survey is 30 minutes. Observation
consent forms—the estimated average
burden per visit for the medical
examiner or driver is 5 to 10 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
Survey—the estimated total annual
burden is 1250 hours for the
information collection based on the
following requirement for statistical
significance: 500 responses from each of
at least five of the medical examiner
professional categories; [2500
respondents per survey × 30 minutes
per respondent = 1250 hours].
Observation consent forms—the
estimated total annual burden is 25 to
50 hours for the information collection
based on the following requirement for
statistical significance: (150 medical
examiners + 150 drivers × 5 to 10
minutes per on-site observation = 25 to
50 hours].
Frequency: Each of the described data
collection efforts will occur only once.
Request for Comments
Interested parties are invited to send
comments regarding any aspect of this
information collection, including but
not limited to: (1) The necessity and
utility of the information collection for
the proper performance of the functions
of FMCSA and specifically the conduct
of the Medical Examiner Performance
Study; (2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the collected
information; and (4) ways to minimize
the collection burden without reducing
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35325
the quality of the collected information.
Comments submitted in response to this
notice will be summarized and included
in the request for OMB’s clearance for
this information collection.
Issued on: June 8, 2006.
David Hugel,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–9512 Filed 6–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
Office of Thrift Supervision
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request;
Suspicious Activity Report
Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network, Department of
the Treasury (FinCEN); Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency,
Department of the Treasury (OCC);
Office of Thrift Supervision, Department
of the Treasury (OTS); Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC); National
Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Submission for OMB review;
joint comment request.
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), FinCEN, OCC, OTS, FDIC,
and NCUA (collectively, the ‘‘agencies’’)
hereby give notice that they have
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) requests for review
of the information collections described
below.
OCC, OTS, FDIC, NCUA, and FinCEN
are submitting the Suspicious Activity
Report (SAR) information collection to
OMB for extension with revision. The
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (the Board) also
participated in this review. However,
the Board, under its Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) delegated
authority, will publish a separate final
notice and submit its SAR information
collection to OMB.
On February 17, 2006, the agencies
and the Board, requested public
comment on a major revision of the SAR
form. OCC also requested comments on
all information collections contained in
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
35326
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices
12 CFR part 21 (‘‘Minimum Security
Devices and Procedures, Reports of
Suspicious Activities, and Bank Secrecy
Act Compliance Program’’). The
agencies have made the proposed
changes, as well as additional changes
suggested by the commenters.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before July 19, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments to
any or all of the agencies. All comments,
which should refer to the associated
OMB control numbers, will be shared
among the agencies. Direct all written
comments as follows:
Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network: Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network, P.O. Box 39, Vienna, VA
22183, Attention: 1506–0001, Revised
Suspicious Activity Report by
Depository Institutions. Comments also
may be submitted by electronic mail to
the following Internet address:
regcomments@fincen.gov with the
caption in the body of the text,
‘‘Attention: 1506–0001, Revised
Suspicious Activity Report by
Depository Institutions’’.
Comptroller of the Currency:
Communications Division, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, Public
Information Room, Mailstop 1–5,
Attention: 1557–0180, 250 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20219. In
addition, comments may be sent by fax
to (202) 874–4448, or by electronic mail
to regs.comments@occ.treas.gov. You
can inspect and photocopy the
comments at the OCC’s Public
Information Room, 250 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20219. You can make
an appointment to inspect the
comments by calling (202) 874–5043.
Additionally, you should send a copy
of your comments to OCC Desk Officer,
1557–0180, by mail to U.S. Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW., #10235, Washington, DC
20503, or by fax to (202) 395–6974.
Office of Thrift Supervision: Send
comments, referring to the collection by
title of the proposal or by OMB control
number, to OMB and OTS at these
addresses: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Desk
Officer for OTS, U.S. Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW., Room 10235, Washington,
DC 20503, or by fax to (202) 395–6974;
and Information Collection Comments,
Chief Counsel’s Office, Office of Thrift
Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20552; send a fax to
(202) 906–6518; or send an e-mail to
infocollection.comments@ots.treas.gov.
The Office of Thrift Supervision will
post comments and the related index on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jun 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
its Internet site at https://
www.ots.treas.gov. In addition,
interested persons may inspect
comments at the Public Reading Room,
1700 G Street, NW., by appointment. To
make an appointment, call (202) 906–
5922, send an e-mail to
public.info@ots.treas.gov, or send a fax
to (202) 906–7755.
Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation: Written comments should
be addressed to Steve Hanft, Clearance
Officer, Legal Division MB–3064,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20429. Fax No.: (202) 898–3838. E-mail:
shanft@fdic.gov.
National Credit Union
Administration: Clearance Officer: Mr.
Neil M. McNamara, (703) 518–6447,
National Credit Union Administration,
1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428, Fax No.: (703) 518–6489,
E-mail: mcnamara@ncua.gov.
OMB: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395–
7316, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
may request additional information or a
copy of the collection by contacting:
FinCEN: Regulatory Policy and
Programs Division at (800) 949–2732.
OCC: You can request additional
information or a copy of the collection
from Mary Gottlieb, OCC Clearance
Officer, or Camille Dickerson, (202)
874–5090, Legislative and Regulatory
Activities Division, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219.
OTS: Marilyn K. Burton, OTS
Clearance Officer, at
marilyn.burton@ots.treas.gov, (202)
906–6467, or facsimile number (202)
906–6518, Litigation Division, Chief
Counsel’s Office, Office of Thrift
Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20552.
Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation: Steve Hanft, Legal Division
MB–3064, Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20429, (202) 898–3907.
National Credit Union
Administration: Tracy Sumpter, Office
of the Chief Information Officer, (703)
518–6444, or John K. Ianno, Office of
General Counsel, (703) 518–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Suspicious Activity Report.
(The OCC is renewing all information
collections covered under the
information collection titled: ‘‘(MA)—
Minimum Security Devices and
Procedures, Reports of Suspicious
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Activities, and Bank Secrecy Act
Compliance Program (12 CFR 21).’’)
OMB Numbers:
FinCEN: 1506–0001
OCC: 1557–0180
OTS: 1550–0003
FDIC: 3064–0077
NCUA: 3133–0094
Form Numbers:
FinCEN: Form 111
OCC: 8010–1/8010–9
OTS: 1601
FDIC: 6710/06
NCUA: 2362
Abstract: In 1985, the agencies issued
procedures to be used by banks, thrifts,
credit unions, their holding companies,
and certain other depository institutions
operating in the United States to report
known or suspected criminal activities
to the appropriate law enforcement
agencies and the agencies themselves.
Beginning in 1994, the agencies
completely redesigned the reporting
process. This redesign resulted in the
existing Suspicious Activity Report,
which became effective in April 1996.1
Comments Received: On February 17,
2006, FinCEN and the banking
regulators published a joint Federal
Register notice (71 FR 8640) seeking
comment on proposed revisions to the
existing SAR. The proposed revisions to
the form and instructions were
published in the notice. All comments
received in response to the notice were
carefully considered. Those comments
that the agencies believe will further
improve the form are included in the
package that the agencies have
submitted to OMB for approval, as
discussed below. The agencies are
publishing the second Federal Register
notice regarding the new Suspicious
Activity Report by Depository
Institutions (SAR-DI), as required by the
PRA. This second notice advises the
public that the agencies have submitted
the proposed revisions to OMB for
approval, discusses the comments
received, explains agency responses to
the comments, and requests additional
comment.
Current Actions: The proposed
revisions standardize the new SAR–DI
with the other SAR forms. The revisions
were detailed in the first Federal
Register notice, a copy of which is
posted on the FinCEN Web site at
https://www.fincen.gov/71_fr_86401.pdf.
1 The report is authorized by the following rules:
31 CFR 103.18 (FinCEN); 12 CFR 21.11 (OCC); 12
CFR 563.180 (OTS); 12 CFR 353.3 (FDIC); 12 CFR
748.1 (NCUA). The rules were issued under the
authority of 31 U.S.C. 5318(g) (FinCEN); 12 U.S.C.
93a, 1818, 1881–84, 3401–22, 31 U.S.C. 5318 (OCC);
12 U.S.C. 1463 and 1464 (OTS); 12 U.S.C. 93a,
1818, 1881–84, 3401–22 (FDIC); 12 U.S.C. 1766(a),
1789(a) (NCUA).
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices
These revisions and additions will
improve the form’s usefulness to law
enforcement and to the agencies.
Comments Received and Agency
Action Taken. The agencies received
generally favorable comments from 23
commenters regarding the first notice. A
majority of the commenters’ suggestions
involved policy issues rather than
comments affecting the form’s data
collection elements. The following is a
summary of the comments received:
1. Two commenters noted that law
enforcement contact information had
been moved to the narrative section.
Response: Noted. This change was
made to simplify the form and was done
with the approval of law enforcement
agencies.
2. Several commenters noted that use
of the special responses listed in the
instructions were confusing and
wondered if the data cells such as SSN
would accept the entries.
Response: Noted. FinCEN confirms
that all cells except ‘‘Total Amount’’
will accept alphanumeric entries. The
instructions have been changed so that
filers need enter only ‘‘XX’’ in critical
fields when the information is
unknown. A check box has been added
to the ‘‘Total Amount’’ cell to allow the
indication ‘‘unknown.’’
3. Several commenters noted concern
about removing the financial institution
contact name from the form.
Response: Noted. This action was
taken with the approval of the agencies
and law enforcement as a measure to
protect the filer if a SAR-DI was
inadvertently disclosed.
4. Several commenters challenged the
listed burden figure of one hour to
complete the SAR-DI form.
Response: The one hour figure cited
in the notice is the time required to
complete the form and does not include
the routine recordkeeping requirement.
The burden has been adjusted to
account for the recordkeeping.
5. Several commenters recommended
that the reporting threshold limits be
raised, time to file increased, and an
exemption for filing on domestic cases
be provided.
Response: The agencies, FinCEN and
law enforcement believe that the
reporting threshold limits and filing
deadlines are appropriate as proposed
in the first notice, and do not believe
that there is a need for an exemption for
filing on domestic cases.
6. Several commenters recommended
adding various check boxes to the
existing form. Cells for tax evasion, PEP
(politically exposed person), MSB
(money services business), and NonCustomer were requested.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jun 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
Response: In each case the ‘‘Other’’
box may be checked and the appropriate
entry made on the line provided. The
agencies believe that this is sufficient.
7. One commenter suggested adding
‘‘or recurring’’ to box 1a.
Response: Accepted.
8. One commenter recommended
moving the SAR–DI Part V instructions
to another page.
Response: The agencies believe that
moving the instructions in this way
would add to the form’s length
unnecessarily.
9. One commenter suggested that the
space for the narrative is too small and
suggested re-numbering the instruction
pages to ‘‘a’’, ‘‘b’’, ‘‘c’’, etc.
Response: The form’s instructions
direct the filer to use a blank sheet of
bond paper if more space is required.
Re-numbering the form’s instruction
pages with letters would not follow the
IRS Style Guide, which is the standard
for BSA forms design.
10. One commenter questioned
whether the government could use all of
the information being collected on the
SAR–DI.
Response: Noted.
11. Several commenters suggested
that the ‘‘optional’’ tag be removed from
the internal file or control number box.
Response: The items tag was changed
to ‘‘If available’.
12. One commenter requested that
reporting institutions be required to
employ enhanced due diligence if more
than one law enforcement contact was
made about a single report.
Response: FinCEN currently notifies
Law Enforcement through the Gateway
system. Therefore, the requested
enhanced due diligence is not needed.
13. Two commenters requested that a
cell for an e-mail address and a check
box to indicate if the subject is an
individual or an entity be added to Part
I of the form.
Response: The addition of an e-mail
address box is accepted. This change is
now included among the proposed
revisions to the form. The type of
subject as an individual or entity should
be apparent from the information in the
subject box.
14. One commenter suggested that
Part II, Item 23a be divided into two
entries.
Response: The Federal Banking
Agencies and FinCEN believe it is more
appropriate for Law Enforcement or the
Examiners to determine the specific
activity.
15. Two commenters requested a
check box to indicate if multiple SAR’s
on the subject had been filed.
Response: This information is already
available from the database.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35327
16. A commenter questioned the need
to include non-depository institution
regulators on the SAR–DI.
Response: Noted. This information is
required if jointly filing a SAR with a
non-depository institution.
17. One commenter suggested
expanding the phone number cells to
handle international numbers,
modifying the DOB box, adding a
reference to e-filing, and also suggested
that the form have ‘‘free form’’ boxes.
Response: Since the instructions
already address each of these
suggestions, no further changes need to
be proposed.
18. In view of the joint filing
capability of the revised SAR–DI, one
commenter suggested changing the
name from Depository Institutions to
Financial Institutions, and requested
that ‘‘amended, corrected, or updated
report’’ be defined. It was also suggested
that the type of phone, i.e., cell,
blackberry, etc., be indicated.
Response: This is the SAR for
Depository Institutions and a name
change would be inconsistent with this
group of filers. The instructions have
been edited to define the terms. The
type of phone is not considered
necessary.
19. Several commenters were
concerned about the effective dates for
the revised form. It was also suggested
that an e-file ‘‘beta’’ test site be used to
insure functionality of the revised form.
Response: This notice identifies
planned target dates for
implementation. These dates will be
adjusted as necessary to provide
adequate planning lead-time. A ‘‘beta’’
e-filing test site is not available.
20. Several commenters requested
joint filing guidance and voiced concern
regarding information sharing.
Response: Guidance has been drafted
and is currently under review. The
agencies expect to issue guidance prior
to the effective date of the form.
21. In response to a Treasury
Inspector General finding, FinCEN and
a commenter recommended that a ‘‘Date
Discovered’’ field be added to the
Suspicious Activity cell.
Response: After discussion, it was
agreed that such a date should not be
added to the report because it would be
too subjective if more than one
suspicious activity was selected.
22. One commenter recommended
that Part V, the narrative, be
restructured to provide specific
examples of what information to
include.
Response: The SAR narrative
checklist and the SAR Activity Review,
available on the FinCEN Web site,
already provide sufficient guidance to
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
35328
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
the type of information recommended
for inclusion in this part of the report.
23. One commenter commented on
the proposed multiple changes to the
SAR and voiced their support for each.
Response: Noted.
24. One commenter and three of the
banking agencies suggested that Part III
be reformatted to provide space to
record ‘‘Holding Company’’ information
if the SAR is filed at the Enterprise
level. The commenter also suggested
that the term ‘‘Branch Office’’ be
renamed to ‘‘Office’’ as more inclusive
and the term ‘‘necessarily’’ be removed
from the statement covering repeat
information.
Response: Accepted. Part III of the
SAR–DI has been reformatted to permit
the recording of holding company
information while correctly listing the
financial institution where the reported
activity occurred and the instructions
have been edited accordingly. To retain
the joint filing format, the term ‘‘Branch
Office’’ has been changed to ‘‘branch or
office’’. The term ‘‘necessarily’’ was
deleted from the appropriate
instruction.
25. One commenter suggested that the
names of people who have questioned
the subjects be included in the report.
It was also suggested that the new
internal control/file number is not
needed. This commenter approved of
excluding the disclosure statements in
the narrative.
Response: SAR Part V Checklist line
‘‘e’’ covers the suggestion regarding
subjects. In view of the removal of the
filer’s name, the internal control/file
number is extremely important in
determining which report is under
discussion. The agencies therefore
believe that this item should remain.
26. One commenter noted that moving
the relationship of subject information
from Part II to Part III posed a problem
with reporting multiple subjects.
Response: Accepted. The instructions
have been revised to correct the noted
problem.
Special Instructions: The agencies are
proposing an effective date of January 1,
2007, for all revisions to the Suspicious
Activity Report (SAR) form and
instructions that are approved by OMB.
The SAR form included in this Federal
Register notice is for training and
system configuration use only. Do not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jun 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
use this form to report suspicious
activity before January 1, 2007.
Depository institutions may use the
current SAR dated July 2003 until June
30, 2007. Depository institutions
reporting possible terrorist-financed
suspicious activity must file a SAR as
indicated above, but should also contact
FinCEN’s Financial Institutions Hotline,
(866) 556–3974, to report the activity.
Call FinCEN’s Regulatory Helpline,
(800) 949–2732, after January 1, 2007,
for individual copies of the form. Visit
FinCEN’s Internet site, https://
www.fincen.gov, after January 1, 2007,
for information about obtaining bulk
copies of the form or to obtain a fill-in
version.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Business, for-profit
institutions, and non-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
FinCEN: 27,262 2
OCC: 1,928
OTS: 862
FDIC: 5,200
NCUA: 9,300
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
FinCEN: 399,848
OCC: 250,184
OTS: 36,569
FDIC: 16,018
NCUA: 2,961
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
Note: The agencies have estimated 60
minutes for form completion. FinCEN
assumes an additional 60 minutes for
recordkeeping as required under 31 FR
103.18).
FinCEN: 799,696 hours 3
OCC: 365,194 hours
OTS: 36,569 hours
FDIC: 16,018 hours
NCUA: 2,961 hours
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a valid OMB control number. A
respondent must retain the supporting
records to the SAR for five years.
2 Many respondents included in this estimate are
also counted in the agencies’ estimates.
3 A respondent need only file one form. The
estimated burden per form is 60 minutes; this
estimate does not allocate time between or among
agencies when copies of the form are filed to satisfy
the rules of more than one agency.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Generally, information collected
pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act is
confidential, but may be shared as
provided by law with regulatory and
law enforcement authorities.
Request for Comments: Comments are
invited on:
(a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agencies, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the agencies’
estimate of the burden of the collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and
(e) Estimates of capital or start-up
costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information.
Attachment: Suspicious Activity Report
by Depository Institutions
Dated: June 12, 2006.
Donald Carbaugh,
Acting Associate Director, Regulatory Policy
and Programs Division, Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network.
Dated: June 2, 2006.
Stuart Feldstein,
Assistant Director, Legislative and Regulatory
Activities Division, Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency.
Dated: June 13, 2006.
Deborah Dakin,
Senior Deputy Chief Counsel, Regulations and
Legislation Division, Office of Thrift
Supervision.
By Order of the Board of Directors.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 8th day of
June, 2006.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on June 6, 2006.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
BILLING CODE 4810–02–P
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jun 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
35329
EN19JN06.001
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices
16:46 Jun 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
EN19JN06.002
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
35330
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jun 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
35331
EN19JN06.003
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices
16:46 Jun 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
EN19JN06.004
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
35332
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jun 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
35333
EN19JN06.005
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices
16:46 Jun 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
EN19JN06.006
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
35334
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices
[FR Doc. 06–5492 Filed 6–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–02–C
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request for Form 8613
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of the
Treasury, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is
soliciting comments concerning Form
8613, Return of Excise Tax on
Undistributed Income of Regulated
Investment Companies.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before August 18, 2006
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Glenn Kirkland Internal Revenue
Service, room 6512, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the form and instructions
should be directed to Larnice Mack at
Internal Revenue Service, room 6512,
1111 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20224, or at (202) 622–
3179, or through the Internet at
(Larnice.Mack@irs.gov).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Return of Excise Tax on
Undistributed Income of Regulated
Investment Companies.
OMB Number: 1545–1016.
Form Number: 18613.
Abstract: Form 8613 is used by
regulated investment companies to
compute and pay the excise tax on
undistributed income imposed under
Internal Revenue Code section 4982. IRS
uses the information to verify that the
correct amount of tax has been reported.
Current Actions: There are no changes
being made to the form at this time.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,500.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jun 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
Estimated Time Per Respondent: 11
hours, 53 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 17,820.
The following paragraph applies to all
of the collections of information covered
by this notice:
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a valid OMB control number.
Books or records relating to a collection
of information must be retained as long
as their contents may become material
in the administration of any internal
revenue law. Generally, tax returns and
tax return information are confidential,
as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
Request for Comments: Comments
submitted in response to this notice will
be summarized and/or included in the
request for OMB approval. All
comments will become a matter of
public record. Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology; and (e) estimates of capital
or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information.
Approved: June 9, 2006.
Glenn Kirkland,
IRS Reports Clearance Office.
[FR Doc. E6–9522 Filed 6–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request for Form 8453–T
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of the
Treasury, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35335
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is
soliciting comments concerning Form
8453–T, Transmittal for Certain
Corporations Required to e-file.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before August 18, 2006
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Glenn P. Kirkland, Internal Revenue
Service, room 6516, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the form and instructions
should be directed to R. Joseph Durbala,
(202) 622–3634, at Internal Revenue
Service, room 6516, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224, or
through the Internet at
RJoseph.Durbala@irs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Transmittal for Certain
Corporations Required to e-file.
OMB Number: 1545–2013.
Form Number: Form 8453–T.
Abstract: Form 8453–T is used if a
corporation is required to file 25 or
more of certain international forms, not
including any required schedules, have
a paper option that can be used for filing
those forms.
Current Actions: There is no change
in the paperwork burden previously
approved by OMB. This form is being
submitted for renewal purposes only.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Businesses and other
for-profit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
5,000.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 3
hours 29 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 17,450.
The following paragraph applies to all
of the collections of information covered
by this notice:
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a valid OMB control number.
Books or records relating to a collection
of information must be retained as long
as their contents may become material
in the administration of any internal
revenue law. Generally, tax returns and
tax return information are confidential,
as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
Request for Comments: Comments
submitted in response to this notice will
be summarized and/or included in the
request for OMB approval. All
comments will become a matter of
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 117 (Monday, June 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35325-35335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5492]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Office of Thrift Supervision
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Suspicious Activity Report
AGENCIES: Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, Department of the
Treasury (FinCEN); Office of the Comptroller of the Currency,
Department of the Treasury (OCC); Office of Thrift Supervision,
Department of the Treasury (OTS); Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC); National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Submission for OMB review; joint comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), FinCEN, OCC, OTS, FDIC, and NCUA
(collectively, the ``agencies'') hereby give notice that they have
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requests for
review of the information collections described below.
OCC, OTS, FDIC, NCUA, and FinCEN are submitting the Suspicious
Activity Report (SAR) information collection to OMB for extension with
revision. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
Board) also participated in this review. However, the Board, under its
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) delegated authority, will publish a
separate final notice and submit its SAR information collection to OMB.
On February 17, 2006, the agencies and the Board, requested public
comment on a major revision of the SAR form. OCC also requested
comments on all information collections contained in
[[Page 35326]]
12 CFR part 21 (``Minimum Security Devices and Procedures, Reports of
Suspicious Activities, and Bank Secrecy Act Compliance Program''). The
agencies have made the proposed changes, as well as additional changes
suggested by the commenters.
DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 19, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to
any or all of the agencies. All comments, which should refer to the
associated OMB control numbers, will be shared among the agencies.
Direct all written comments as follows:
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network: Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network, P.O. Box 39, Vienna, VA 22183, Attention: 1506-0001, Revised
Suspicious Activity Report by Depository Institutions. Comments also
may be submitted by electronic mail to the following Internet address:
regcomments@fincen.gov with the caption in the body of the text,
``Attention: 1506-0001, Revised Suspicious Activity Report by
Depository Institutions''.
Comptroller of the Currency: Communications Division, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, Public Information Room, Mailstop 1-5,
Attention: 1557-0180, 250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219. In
addition, comments may be sent by fax to (202) 874-4448, or by
electronic mail to regs.comments@occ.treas.gov. You can inspect and
photocopy the comments at the OCC's Public Information Room, 250 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219. You can make an appointment to
inspect the comments by calling (202) 874-5043.
Additionally, you should send a copy of your comments to OCC Desk
Officer, 1557-0180, by mail to U.S. Office of Management and Budget,
725 17th Street, NW., 10235, Washington, DC 20503, or by fax
to (202) 395-6974.
Office of Thrift Supervision: Send comments, referring to the
collection by title of the proposal or by OMB control number, to OMB
and OTS at these addresses: Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attention: Desk Officer for OTS, U.S. Office of Management and
Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, or by
fax to (202) 395-6974; and Information Collection Comments, Chief
Counsel's Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20552; send a fax to (202) 906-6518; or send an e-mail
to infocollection.comments@ots.treas.gov. The Office of Thrift
Supervision will post comments and the related index on its Internet
site at https://www.ots.treas.gov. In addition, interested persons may
inspect comments at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., by
appointment. To make an appointment, call (202) 906-5922, send an e-
mail to public.info@ots.treas.gov, or send a fax to (202) 906-7755.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation: Written comments should be
addressed to Steve Hanft, Clearance Officer, Legal Division MB-3064,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20429. Fax No.: (202) 898-3838. E-mail: shanft@fdic.gov.
National Credit Union Administration: Clearance Officer: Mr. Neil
M. McNamara, (703) 518-6447, National Credit Union Administration, 1775
Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, Fax No.: (703) 518-6489, E-
mail: mcnamara@ncua.gov.
OMB: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7316, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive
Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You may request additional information
or a copy of the collection by contacting:
FinCEN: Regulatory Policy and Programs Division at (800) 949-2732.
OCC: You can request additional information or a copy of the
collection from Mary Gottlieb, OCC Clearance Officer, or Camille
Dickerson, (202) 874-5090, Legislative and Regulatory Activities
Division, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20219.
OTS: Marilyn K. Burton, OTS Clearance Officer, at
marilyn.burton@ots.treas.gov, (202) 906-6467, or facsimile number (202)
906-6518, Litigation Division, Chief Counsel's Office, Office of Thrift
Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation: Steve Hanft, Legal Division
MB-3064, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20429, (202) 898-3907.
National Credit Union Administration: Tracy Sumpter, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, (703) 518-6444, or John K. Ianno, Office of
General Counsel, (703) 518-6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Suspicious Activity Report. (The OCC is renewing all
information collections covered under the information collection
titled: ``(MA)--Minimum Security Devices and Procedures, Reports of
Suspicious Activities, and Bank Secrecy Act Compliance Program (12 CFR
21).'')
OMB Numbers:
FinCEN: 1506-0001
OCC: 1557-0180
OTS: 1550-0003
FDIC: 3064-0077
NCUA: 3133-0094
Form Numbers:
FinCEN: Form 111
OCC: 8010-1/8010-9
OTS: 1601
FDIC: 6710/06
NCUA: 2362
Abstract: In 1985, the agencies issued procedures to be used by
banks, thrifts, credit unions, their holding companies, and certain
other depository institutions operating in the United States to report
known or suspected criminal activities to the appropriate law
enforcement agencies and the agencies themselves. Beginning in 1994,
the agencies completely redesigned the reporting process. This redesign
resulted in the existing Suspicious Activity Report, which became
effective in April 1996.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The report is authorized by the following rules: 31 CFR
103.18 (FinCEN); 12 CFR 21.11 (OCC); 12 CFR 563.180 (OTS); 12 CFR
353.3 (FDIC); 12 CFR 748.1 (NCUA). The rules were issued under the
authority of 31 U.S.C. 5318(g) (FinCEN); 12 U.S.C. 93a, 1818, 1881-
84, 3401-22, 31 U.S.C. 5318 (OCC); 12 U.S.C. 1463 and 1464 (OTS); 12
U.S.C. 93a, 1818, 1881-84, 3401-22 (FDIC); 12 U.S.C. 1766(a),
1789(a) (NCUA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments Received: On February 17, 2006, FinCEN and the banking
regulators published a joint Federal Register notice (71 FR 8640)
seeking comment on proposed revisions to the existing SAR. The proposed
revisions to the form and instructions were published in the notice.
All comments received in response to the notice were carefully
considered. Those comments that the agencies believe will further
improve the form are included in the package that the agencies have
submitted to OMB for approval, as discussed below. The agencies are
publishing the second Federal Register notice regarding the new
Suspicious Activity Report by Depository Institutions (SAR-DI), as
required by the PRA. This second notice advises the public that the
agencies have submitted the proposed revisions to OMB for approval,
discusses the comments received, explains agency responses to the
comments, and requests additional comment.
Current Actions: The proposed revisions standardize the new SAR-DI
with the other SAR forms. The revisions were detailed in the first
Federal Register notice, a copy of which is posted on the FinCEN Web
site at https://www.fincen.gov/71_fr_86401.pdf.
[[Page 35327]]
These revisions and additions will improve the form's usefulness to law
enforcement and to the agencies.
Comments Received and Agency Action Taken. The agencies received
generally favorable comments from 23 commenters regarding the first
notice. A majority of the commenters' suggestions involved policy
issues rather than comments affecting the form's data collection
elements. The following is a summary of the comments received:
1. Two commenters noted that law enforcement contact information
had been moved to the narrative section.
Response: Noted. This change was made to simplify the form and was
done with the approval of law enforcement agencies.
2. Several commenters noted that use of the special responses
listed in the instructions were confusing and wondered if the data
cells such as SSN would accept the entries.
Response: Noted. FinCEN confirms that all cells except ``Total
Amount'' will accept alphanumeric entries. The instructions have been
changed so that filers need enter only ``XX'' in critical fields when
the information is unknown. A check box has been added to the ``Total
Amount'' cell to allow the indication ``unknown.''
3. Several commenters noted concern about removing the financial
institution contact name from the form.
Response: Noted. This action was taken with the approval of the
agencies and law enforcement as a measure to protect the filer if a
SAR-DI was inadvertently disclosed.
4. Several commenters challenged the listed burden figure of one
hour to complete the SAR-DI form.
Response: The one hour figure cited in the notice is the time
required to complete the form and does not include the routine
recordkeeping requirement. The burden has been adjusted to account for
the recordkeeping.
5. Several commenters recommended that the reporting threshold
limits be raised, time to file increased, and an exemption for filing
on domestic cases be provided.
Response: The agencies, FinCEN and law enforcement believe that the
reporting threshold limits and filing deadlines are appropriate as
proposed in the first notice, and do not believe that there is a need
for an exemption for filing on domestic cases.
6. Several commenters recommended adding various check boxes to the
existing form. Cells for tax evasion, PEP (politically exposed person),
MSB (money services business), and Non-Customer were requested.
Response: In each case the ``Other'' box may be checked and the
appropriate entry made on the line provided. The agencies believe that
this is sufficient.
7. One commenter suggested adding ``or recurring'' to box 1a.
Response: Accepted.
8. One commenter recommended moving the SAR-DI Part V instructions
to another page.
Response: The agencies believe that moving the instructions in this
way would add to the form's length unnecessarily.
9. One commenter suggested that the space for the narrative is too
small and suggested re-numbering the instruction pages to ``a'', ``b'',
``c'', etc.
Response: The form's instructions direct the filer to use a blank
sheet of bond paper if more space is required. Re-numbering the form's
instruction pages with letters would not follow the IRS Style Guide,
which is the standard for BSA forms design.
10. One commenter questioned whether the government could use all
of the information being collected on the SAR-DI.
Response: Noted.
11. Several commenters suggested that the ``optional'' tag be
removed from the internal file or control number box.
Response: The items tag was changed to ``If available'.
12. One commenter requested that reporting institutions be required
to employ enhanced due diligence if more than one law enforcement
contact was made about a single report.
Response: FinCEN currently notifies Law Enforcement through the
Gateway system. Therefore, the requested enhanced due diligence is not
needed.
13. Two commenters requested that a cell for an e-mail address and
a check box to indicate if the subject is an individual or an entity be
added to Part I of the form.
Response: The addition of an e-mail address box is accepted. This
change is now included among the proposed revisions to the form. The
type of subject as an individual or entity should be apparent from the
information in the subject box.
14. One commenter suggested that Part II, Item 23a be divided into
two entries.
Response: The Federal Banking Agencies and FinCEN believe it is
more appropriate for Law Enforcement or the Examiners to determine the
specific activity.
15. Two commenters requested a check box to indicate if multiple
SAR's on the subject had been filed.
Response: This information is already available from the database.
16. A commenter questioned the need to include non-depository
institution regulators on the SAR-DI.
Response: Noted. This information is required if jointly filing a
SAR with a non-depository institution.
17. One commenter suggested expanding the phone number cells to
handle international numbers, modifying the DOB box, adding a reference
to e-filing, and also suggested that the form have ``free form'' boxes.
Response: Since the instructions already address each of these
suggestions, no further changes need to be proposed.
18. In view of the joint filing capability of the revised SAR-DI,
one commenter suggested changing the name from Depository Institutions
to Financial Institutions, and requested that ``amended, corrected, or
updated report'' be defined. It was also suggested that the type of
phone, i.e., cell, blackberry, etc., be indicated.
Response: This is the SAR for Depository Institutions and a name
change would be inconsistent with this group of filers. The
instructions have been edited to define the terms. The type of phone is
not considered necessary.
19. Several commenters were concerned about the effective dates for
the revised form. It was also suggested that an e-file ``beta'' test
site be used to insure functionality of the revised form.
Response: This notice identifies planned target dates for
implementation. These dates will be adjusted as necessary to provide
adequate planning lead-time. A ``beta'' e-filing test site is not
available.
20. Several commenters requested joint filing guidance and voiced
concern regarding information sharing.
Response: Guidance has been drafted and is currently under review.
The agencies expect to issue guidance prior to the effective date of
the form.
21. In response to a Treasury Inspector General finding, FinCEN and
a commenter recommended that a ``Date Discovered'' field be added to
the Suspicious Activity cell.
Response: After discussion, it was agreed that such a date should
not be added to the report because it would be too subjective if more
than one suspicious activity was selected.
22. One commenter recommended that Part V, the narrative, be
restructured to provide specific examples of what information to
include.
Response: The SAR narrative checklist and the SAR Activity Review,
available on the FinCEN Web site, already provide sufficient guidance
to
[[Page 35328]]
the type of information recommended for inclusion in this part of the
report.
23. One commenter commented on the proposed multiple changes to the
SAR and voiced their support for each.
Response: Noted.
24. One commenter and three of the banking agencies suggested that
Part III be reformatted to provide space to record ``Holding Company''
information if the SAR is filed at the Enterprise level. The commenter
also suggested that the term ``Branch Office'' be renamed to ``Office''
as more inclusive and the term ``necessarily'' be removed from the
statement covering repeat information.
Response: Accepted. Part III of the SAR-DI has been reformatted to
permit the recording of holding company information while correctly
listing the financial institution where the reported activity occurred
and the instructions have been edited accordingly. To retain the joint
filing format, the term ``Branch Office'' has been changed to ``branch
or office''. The term ``necessarily'' was deleted from the appropriate
instruction.
25. One commenter suggested that the names of people who have
questioned the subjects be included in the report. It was also
suggested that the new internal control/file number is not needed. This
commenter approved of excluding the disclosure statements in the
narrative.
Response: SAR Part V Checklist line ``e'' covers the suggestion
regarding subjects. In view of the removal of the filer's name, the
internal control/file number is extremely important in determining
which report is under discussion. The agencies therefore believe that
this item should remain.
26. One commenter noted that moving the relationship of subject
information from Part II to Part III posed a problem with reporting
multiple subjects.
Response: Accepted. The instructions have been revised to correct
the noted problem.
Special Instructions: The agencies are proposing an effective date
of January 1, 2007, for all revisions to the Suspicious Activity Report
(SAR) form and instructions that are approved by OMB. The SAR form
included in this Federal Register notice is for training and system
configuration use only. Do not use this form to report suspicious
activity before January 1, 2007. Depository institutions may use the
current SAR dated July 2003 until June 30, 2007. Depository
institutions reporting possible terrorist-financed suspicious activity
must file a SAR as indicated above, but should also contact FinCEN's
Financial Institutions Hotline, (866) 556-3974, to report the activity.
Call FinCEN's Regulatory Helpline, (800) 949-2732, after January 1,
2007, for individual copies of the form. Visit FinCEN's Internet site,
https://www.fincen.gov, after January 1, 2007, for information about
obtaining bulk copies of the form or to obtain a fill-in version.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Business, for-profit institutions, and non-profit
institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
FinCEN: 27,262 \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Many respondents included in this estimate are also counted
in the agencies' estimates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC: 1,928
OTS: 862
FDIC: 5,200
NCUA: 9,300
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
FinCEN: 399,848
OCC: 250,184
OTS: 36,569
FDIC: 16,018
NCUA: 2,961
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
Note: The agencies have estimated 60 minutes for form
completion. FinCEN assumes an additional 60 minutes for
recordkeeping as required under 31 FR 103.18).
FinCEN: 799,696 hours \3\
OCC: 365,194 hours
OTS: 36,569 hours
FDIC: 16,018 hours
NCUA: 2,961 hours
\3\ A respondent need only file one form. The estimated burden
per form is 60 minutes; this estimate does not allocate time between
or among agencies when copies of the form are filed to satisfy the
rules of more than one agency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of
information displays a valid OMB control number. A respondent must
retain the supporting records to the SAR for five years. Generally,
information collected pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act is confidential,
but may be shared as provided by law with regulatory and law
enforcement authorities.
Request for Comments: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the agencies, including whether
the information shall have practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the agencies' estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; and
(e) Estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
Attachment: Suspicious Activity Report by Depository Institutions
Dated: June 12, 2006.
Donald Carbaugh,
Acting Associate Director, Regulatory Policy and Programs Division,
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
Dated: June 2, 2006.
Stuart Feldstein,
Assistant Director, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division,
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Dated: June 13, 2006.
Deborah Dakin,
Senior Deputy Chief Counsel, Regulations and Legislation Division,
Office of Thrift Supervision.
By Order of the Board of Directors.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 8th day of June, 2006.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board on June 6,
2006.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
BILLING CODE 4810-02-P
[[Page 35329]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN06.001
[[Page 35330]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN06.002
[[Page 35331]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN06.003
[[Page 35332]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN06.004
[[Page 35333]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN06.005
[[Page 35334]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JN06.006
[[Page 35335]]
[FR Doc. 06-5492 Filed 6-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-02-C