Rule Title: Department of State Acquisition Regulation, 34836-34842 [E6-9502]
Download as PDF
34836
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 116 / Friday, June 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
for purposes of calculating the value of
the end product includes services
(except transportation services)
incidental to its supply, provided that
the value of those incidental services
does not exceed the value of the product
itself.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The Contractor shall deliver under
this contract only domestic end
products unless, in its offer, it specified
delivery of qualifying country end
products, Free Trade Agreement country
end products other than Moroccan end
products, or other foreign end products
in the Buy American Act-Free Trade
Agreements-Balance of Payments
Program Certificate provision of the
solicitation. If the Contractor certified in
its offer that it will deliver a qualifying
country end product or a Free Trade
Agreement country end product other
than a Moroccan end product, the
Contractor shall deliver a qualifying
country end product, a Free Trade
Agreement country end product other
than a Moroccan end product, or, at the
Contractor’s option, a domestic end
product.
*
*
*
*
*
7. Section 252.225–7045 is amended
by revising the clause date, the
definition of ‘‘Designated country’’ in
paragraph (a), and Alternate I to read as
follows:
252.225–7045 Balance of Payments
Program—Construction Material Under
Trade Agreements.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
Balance of Payments Program—
Construction Material Under Trade
Agreements (JUN 2006)
(a) * * *
Designated country means—
(1) A World Trade Organization
Government Procurement Agreement
(WTO GPA) country (Aruba, Austria,
Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Czech
Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland,
France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong,
Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy,
Japan, Korea (Republic of), Latvia,
Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg,
Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland,
Portugal, Singapore, Slovak Republic,
Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
or the United Kingdom);
(2) A Free Trade Agreement country
(Australia, Canada, Chile, El Salvador,
Honduras, Mexico, Morocco, Nicaragua,
or Singapore);
(3) A least developed country
(Afghanistan, Angola, Bangladesh,
Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Burundi,
Cambodia, Cape Verde, Central African
Republic, Chad, Comoros, Democratic
Republic of Congo, Djibouti, East Timor,
Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Jun 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti,
Kiribati, Laos, Lesotho, Madagascar,
Malawi, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania,
Mozambique, Nepal, Niger, Rwanda,
Samoa, Sao Tome and Principe,
Senegal, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands,
Somalia, Tanzania, Togo, Tuvalu,
Uganda, Vanuatu, Yemen, or Zambia);
or
(4) A Caribbean Basin country
(Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas,
Barbados, Belize, British Virgin Islands,
Costa Rica, Dominica, Dominican
Republic, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana,
Haiti, Jamaica, Montserrat, Netherlands
Antilles, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia,
St. Vincent and the Grenadines, or
Trinidad and Tobago).
*
*
*
*
*
Alternate I (JUN 2006). As prescribed
in 225.7503(b), add the following
definition of ‘‘Mexican construction
material’’ to paragraph (a) of the basic
clause, and substitute the following
paragraphs (b) and (c) for paragraphs (b)
and (c) of the basic clause:
Mexican construction material means
a construction material that—
(1) Is wholly the growth, product, or
manufacture of Mexico; or
(2) In the case of a construction
material that consists in whole or in part
of materials from another country, has
been substantially transformed in
Mexico into a new and different
construction material distinct from the
materials from which it was
transformed.
(b) This clause implements the
Balance of Payments Program by
providing a preference for domestic
construction material. In addition, the
Contracting Officer has determined that
the WTO GPA and all Free Trade
Agreements except NAFTA apply to this
acquisition. Therefore, the Balance of
Payments Program restrictions are
waived for designated country
construction material other than
Mexican construction material.
(c) The Contractor shall use only
domestic or designated country
construction material other than
Mexican construction material in
performing this contract, except for—(1)
Construction material valued at or
below the simplified acquisition
threshold in Part 2 of the Federal
Acquisition Regulation; or
(2) The construction material or
components listed by the Government
as follows:
[Contracting Officer to list applicable
excepted materials or indicate ‘‘none’’].
[FR Doc. E6–9500 Filed 6–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
48 CFR Parts 601, 611, 619, 622, 628,
and 652
[Public Notice 5444]
RIN 1400–AB90
Rule Title: Department of State
Acquisition Regulation
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This rule makes final a
proposed rule issued on December 22,
2004, with several revisions. It revises
the DOSAR to formalize Department
policy regarding the application of the
Small Business Act to contracts
awarded by domestic contracting
activities where contract performance
takes place overseas; and, revises the
coverage regarding Defense Base Act
insurance. The final rule also contains
several miscellaneous amendments and
corrections not published on December
22, 2004, as outlined below. The
Department received public comments
from three sources on the proposed rule,
which are discussed below.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective June 16, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gladys Gines, Procurement Analyst,
Department of State, Office of the
Procurement Executive, 2201 C Street,
NW., Suite 603, State Annex Number 6,
Washington, DC 20522–0602; e-mail
address: ginesgg@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department published a proposed rule,
Public Notice 4938 at 69 FR 76660,
December 22, 2004, with a request for
comments, amending Parts 619, 625,
628, and 652 of Title 48 of the Code of
Federal Regulations. The rule made
three changes to the DOSAR: (1)
Formalized policy regarding the
application of the Small Business Act to
contracts awarded by domestic
contracting activities where contract
performance takes place overseas; (2)
added language to deal with U.S.
Government support to contractors
performing overseas; and (3) revised the
coverage regarding Defense Base Act
insurance. The proposed rule was
discussed in detail in Public Notice
4938. The Department is now
promulgating a final rule with changes
from the proposed rule.
In particular, the Department is not
finalizing that part of the proposed rule
dealing with U.S. Government support
to contractors performing overseas. The
Department of Defense published a final
rule on May 5, 2005 (70 FR 23790). That
final rule contained a clause for use in
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 116 / Friday, June 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
DOD contracts that require contractor
personnel to deploy with, or otherwise
provide support in the theater of
operations, to U.S. military forces
deployed outside the United States in
contingency operations, humanitarian
or peacekeeping operations, or other
military operations or exercises
designated by the combatant
commander. The State Department’s
proposed rule language was, in part,
based on this DOD rule. However, in the
interim, the FAR Council has
determined that coverage for DOD,
State, and other agencies regarding
contractor support outside the United
States is necessary for those services
that are not in direct support of a
deployed military force, e.g.,
reconstruction efforts. A FAR case is
being developed to deal with U.S.
Government support to contractors
operating overseas. The Department of
State intends to follow the FAR
language when promulgated; therefore,
separate DOSAR language will not be
required.
The final rule also contains several
amendments and corrections that were
not published as part of the proposed
rule. They are as follows:
• DOSAR 601.106 is revised to add
the information collection number and
burden estimate for Department of State
Form DS–4053, Department of State
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Program Application.
• DOSAR 601.603–70(b) is revised to
add an additional DOS office that has
been delegated limited procurement
authority.
• DOSAR 611.502 is corrected to read
611.501. The FAR citation of 11.502(d)
is corrected to read FAR 11.501(d).
• DOSAR 619.803–71(b) is revised to
change the reference to the Small
Business Administration’s PRO-Net
database to the Central Contractor
Registration (CCR) database. The CCR
database is now the official source of
vendor data for the Government.
• DOSAR 619.811–3 is revised to
remove the reference to Alternate III of
FAR clause 52.219–18, Notification of
Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a)
Concerns. There is no Alternate III to
FAR 52.219–18.
• DOSAR 622.604–2 is revised to
correct a citation.
These amendments and corrections
do not affect the public, and therefore
good cause exists to publish the
amendments for effect without first
soliciting public comment because prior
public comment is unnecessary. The
amendments are for the purpose of
implementing internal changes and
making minor corrections.
Analysis of Comments: The proposed
rule was published for comment on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Jun 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
December 22, 2004 (69 FR 76660). The
comment period closed on February 22,
2005. The Department received
comments from three sources. The
following is a synopsis of the
Department’s response to the public
comments and any changes made to the
rule as a result. The comments are
grouped by topic.
I. Comments Regarding the Application
of the Small Business Act
1. Comment: One commentator
disagreed that the language of FAR
19.000(b) is ambiguous, and questioned
the Department’s policy of applying the
Small Business Act to contracts
awarded domestically and performed
overseas. The commentator pointed out
that no other agency has made such an
interpretation.
Response: Nonconcur. The
Department does consider the language
of FAR 19.000(b), which states that FAR
Part 19, with the exception of Subpart
19.6, applies ‘‘only in the United States
or its outlying areas’’, to be ambiguous.
The application of the Small Business
Act to contracts awarded domestically
for performance overseas has been a
longstanding practice at the Department
of State; this rule merely formalizes that
practice.
2. Comment: One commentator stated
that if the Department implemented the
proposed language, it should adopt a
regime that reflects the realities of work
in a contingency operation or high risk
location and that is directly related to
the instant procurement requirement.
Response: Partially Concur. The
Department already does this. DOSAR
619.201(d)(5) requires that the Office of
Small and Disadvantaged Utilization (A/
SDBU) review requests for acquisitions
exceeding the simplified acquisition
threshold ($100,000), and task and
delivery orders exceeding $2 million.
The capabilities and capacities of small
businesses to perform on any given
acquisition, including those in
contingency or high risk locations, are
taken into consideration by A/SDBU
when making set-aside
recommendations. Since this
requirement is already in the DOSAR,
no change to the rule is necessary.
3. Comment: One commentator
expressed confusion regarding what the
Department meant by the term
‘‘legislatively specified categories’’.
Response: Concur. The term
‘‘legislatively specified categories’’
refers to the small business programs
under the Small Business Act, namely,
small business concerns, HUBZone
small business concerns, servicedisabled veteran-owned small business
concerns, 8(a) concerns, women-owned
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34837
small business concerns, small
disadvantaged business concerns, and
veteran-owned small business concerns.
However, to avoid confusion, this term
has been removed from the final rule.
4. Comment: One commentator
recommended revising the last sentence
of proposed 619.000(b) to state:
‘‘Contracts that are both awarded and
performed outside the United States
should comply on a voluntary basis.’’
Response: Concur. The sentence has
been revised accordingly.
5. Comment: One commentator
questioned the practicality of the
proposed rule, citing the requirement
for subcontracting plans and goals and
questioning how goals will be
negotiated. The commentator
questioned how the Department would
reconcile these small business
subcontracting goals with U.S. treaty
obligations and the frequent U.S. foreign
policy goal of requiring U.S. contractors
to use host country businesses and
resources.
Response: Nonconcur. As indicated
previously, this policy is not new. In
point of fact, the Department has not
experienced difficulties in
implementing this policy. FAR
19.702(b) states that subcontracting
plans are not required for contracts that
will be performed entirely outside of the
United States, so contracts that are
performed overseas are already
exempted from the subcontracting plan
requirements. Additionally, the
Omnibus Diplomatic Security and
Antiterrorism Act (Public Law 99–399)
stipulates that ten percent of the monies
appropriated for diplomatic security
should, to the extent practicable, be
awarded to minority owned business
concerns, and another 10 percent to
small businesses. In making any setaside recommendations, A/SDBU takes
into account all of the issues raised by
the commentator, including any
limitations that foreign governments
may impose. No change to the rule is
therefore necessary.
6. Comment: One commentator
suggested that, instead of applying the
policy, the Department use small
business performance as a competitive
evaluation factor in appropriate
solicitations.
Response: Partially Concur. The
Department already does this. DOSAR
619.705–3 encourages contracting
officers to consider the adequacy of
subcontracting plans and/or past
performance in achieving negotiated
goals, as part of the overall evaluation
of proposals. Since this requirement is
already in the DOSAR, no change to the
rule is necessary.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
34838
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 116 / Friday, June 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
7. Comment: One commentator
recommended that the Department
conduct a public meeting to discuss the
rule, as well as separate this revision
from the other parts of the proposed
rule.
Response: Nonconcur. The
Department does not see the need for a
public meeting, nor to separate this from
the rest of the rule. As indicated
previously, this has been a longstanding
practice and the Department has not
experienced any difficulties in its
implementation.
II. Comments Regarding Defense Base
Act (DBA) Insurance
1. Comment: One commentator
expressed concern about how vendors
would know, at the time of the
solicitation, whether a country has a
workers’ compensation law.
Response: Concur. The Department
agrees that this information should be
provided by the Government in the
solicitation. The solicitation provision
at 652.228–70 has been revised so that
the contracting officer will check a
block to indicate if a country does or
does not have such laws.
2. Comment: One commentator
requested that the rule be revised so that
contractors would be allowed to
purchase their own Defense Base Act
insurance rather than use the insurance
broker that the Department has under
contract.
Response: Nonconcur. The contract
with the insurance broker is a
requirements contract. This means that
the Department has an obligation to
require that its contractors purchase all
of their DBA insurance from the
insurance broker. In addition, the
Department has negotiated more
favorable rates since the contractor has
been assured of the volume of work.
Since the cost of the DBA insurance
premiums is a direct reimbursable cost
under the Department’s contracts,
contractors do not incur additional costs
in procuring the DBA insurance from
the Department’s contractor.
3. Comment: All commentators,
including the Department of Labor
(DOL), expressed concern regarding the
coverage on Section 16 of the State
Department Basic Authorities Act. This
statutory provision provides that the
Defense Base Act shall not apply with
respect to such contracts as the
Secretary of State determines are
contracts with persons employed to
perform work for the Department on an
intermittent basis for not more than 90
days in a calendar year. Specifically,
commentators pointed out that the rule
did not address how to request a waiver,
under what circumstances a waiver
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Jun 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
would be approved, how the
Department would notify exempted
individuals, and what workers’
compensation coverage these exempted
employees would have.
Response: Concur. The Department
agrees that more detail is required. The
language in the State Department Basic
Authorities Act was added in the early
1980s, before the Department had a
contract with an insurance broker for
DBA insurance. At that time, contractors
that had short-term contracts with the
Department for overseas performance
were paying relatively high DBA
insurance premiums. However, State
worker’s compensation programs
protected workers based in that State
when they performed short out-of-state
assignments, even foreign assignments.
Since the workers had the protection of
the State’s workers’ compensation law,
additional DBA insurance was not
needed for these short-term
assignments.
In response to these comments, the
Department has revised the language of
the proposed rule to: (1) List the
information that a contractor must
submit in order for a waiver to be
considered; (2) conditioned the waiver
on the contractor’s presentation of
evidence of alternative workers’
compensation coverage (e.g., from the
State); and (3) limited the waiver to U.S.
citizens and residents, not local or third
country nationals. We believe that these
changes address the concerns raised
regarding what coverage these exempted
employees would have. We also have
added language that the contracting
officer will provide the contractor with
the original of any approved waivers,
thereby addressing the concern of how
contractors will be notified. The
Department believes that since we now
have a contract with an insurance
broker for DBA insurance at reasonable
rates, requests for waivers should be
rare.
To further clarify DBA coverage, we
have added language, based on guidance
from DOL, that individuals who are selfemployed (i.e., are not incorporated) do
not meet the definition of an employee;
therefore, no DBA insurance is required
when contracting with these
individuals. The language was added
because the Department does contract
with individuals (e.g., eligible family
members) to perform tasks (e.g., prepare
a monthly embassy newsletter), and the
question was raised as to whether these
individuals needed to procure DBA
insurance.
4. Comment: The paragraph
numbering of proposed DOSAR 628.305
is incorrect. The paragraphs are
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
numbered (b) through (f) instead of (a)
through (e).
Response: Nonconcur. The DOSAR
follows the FAR numbering convention.
We are implementing paragraphs (b)
through (e) of the FAR, but not
implementing paragraph (a) of FAR
28.305, since that paragraph (a) is
merely a definition of ‘‘public-work
contract.’’
5. Comment: DOL supports the new
definition of ‘‘covered contractor
employees’’, as well as the
acknowledgement that local and third
country nationals are covered by DBA if
there is no local workers’ compensation
law.
Response: Concur. No revision is
necessary.
6. Comment: One commentator
recommended that in the clause
prescriptions at DOSAR 628.309–70(a)
and (b), we retain the reference to
628.309(b) only in both instances, as
opposed to (b)(1). By only referring to
(b)(1), we have unintentionally
excluded the recognized exceptions to
coverage that are cross-referenced in
628.305(b)(2).
Response: Concur. We have revised
the section accordingly.
7. Comment: One commentator
recommended that we either delete the
repetitious definition of ‘‘covered
contractor employee’’ in the provision at
652.228–74 and simply provide a crossreference to the language at 628.305(a),
or add at the end of paragraph (a) of
652.228–74 a new sentence that
recognizes the exception for intermittent
employees where the Procurement
Executive has granted a waiver.
Response: Nonconcur. We believe that
it is important to have the definition of
‘‘covered contractor employee’’ in the
solicitation provision so that vendors
will not have to refer back to other parts
of the regulation. At the time of the
solicitation, vendors will not know
whether they will have any exempted
employees, since any waiver is
approved after contract award. They
will need to include the DBA insurance
costs for those employees in terms of
preparing their cost proposal. Should a
waiver be approved after contract
award, the contractor simply would not
request reimbursement for any
employees that are exempted under the
waiver, since the DBA insurance costs
are a direct reimbursable cost under the
contract.
8. Comment: One commentator
recommended that the Department
conduct a public meeting to discuss the
rule, as well as separate this revision
from the other parts of the proposed
rule.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 116 / Friday, June 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Response: Nonconcur. The
Department does not see the need for a
public meeting, nor to separate this from
the rest of the rule. As indicated, most
of the comments regarding the DBA
coverage center around the waiver for
intermittent employees, and the
Department believes that these waivers
will be a rare occurrence.
III. Comments Regarding U.S.
Government Support to Contractors
Overseas
The Department received numerous
comments regarding this section of the
proposed rule. However, since the
Department is rescinding this part of the
proposed rule, and will adopt the FAR
language, no discussion of the
comments is required. The public will
have an opportunity to comment on the
FAR language.
Regulatory Findings
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is publishing this
rule as a final rule with changes after it
was published as a proposed rule on
December 22, 2004 (see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of State, in
accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has
reviewed this regulation and, by
approving it, certifies that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $1 million or more in
any year and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of
1996. This rule will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; a major increase in
costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign
based companies in domestic and
import markets.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Jun 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this
rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement.
34839
(b) * * *
(8) Bureau of Administration, Office
of Operations. The authority to enter
into and administer simplified
acquisition transactions for emergency
or contingency operations necessary to
protect life or federal property. This
authority is limited to cases when a
contracting officer in the Office of
Acquisitions Management is
unavailable.
Subchapter B—Competition and
Acquisition Planning
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Review
This regulation has been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget.
PART 611—DESCRIBING AGENCY
NEEDS
Paperwork Reduction Act
Information collection requirements
have been approved under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 by
OMB, and have been assigned OMB
control number 1405–0050. The
information and recordkeeping
requirements for Form DS–4053,
´ ´
Department of State Mentor-Protege
Program Application, have been
approved by OMB under OMB Control
Number 1405–0161.
4. Section 611.502 is redesignated as
section 611.501. New section 611.501 is
amended by correcting the citation at
the end of paragraph (d) to read ‘‘FAR
11.501(d).’’
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 601,
611, 619, 622, 628, 652
Government procurement.
I Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, title 48, chapter 6 of
the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
I 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 601, 611, 619, 622, 628, and 652
continues to read as follows:
611.502 [Redesignated as 611.501] and
611.501 [Amended]
I
Subchapter D—Socioeconomic Programs
PART 619—SMALL BUSINESS
PROGRAMS
5. A new section 619.000 is added to
read as follows:
I
619.000
Scope of part.
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 22 U.S.C.
2658.
(b) It is the Department’s policy to
provide maximum opportunities for
U.S. small businesses to participate in
the acquisition process. DOS contracts
that are awarded domestically for
performance overseas shall be subject to
the Small Business Act as a matter of
policy. Contracts that are both awarded
and performed overseas should comply
on a voluntary basis.
Subchapter A—General
619.803–71
PART 601—DEPARTMENT OF STATE
ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM
I
2. Section 601.106 is amended by
adding the following sentence at the
end:
I
601.106 OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
* * * The information and
recordkeeping requirements for Form
DS–4053, Department of State Mentor´ ´
Protege Program Application, have been
approved by OMB under OMB Control
Number 1405–0161; the burden estimate
is 294 hours.
I 3. Section 601.603–70 is amended by
adding a new paragraph (b)(8) to read as
follows:
601.603–70
*
PO 00000
*
Delegations of authority.
*
Frm 00053
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
[Amended]
6. Section 619.803–71 is amended by
removing the words ‘‘SBA’s PRO-Net
database on the Internet (https://
www.sba.gov)’’ and inserting the words
‘‘Central Contractor Registration
database (https://www.ccr.gov)’’ in their
place in paragraph (b).
619.811–3
[Amended]
7. Section 619.811–3 is amended by
removing the words ‘‘with its Alternate
III’’ in paragraph (d)(3).
I
PART 622—APPLICATION OF LABOR
LAWS TO GOVERNMENT
ACQUISITIONS
622.604–2
[Amended]
8. Section 622.604–2 is amended by
revising the citation to read ‘‘FAR
22.604–2(b)(1)’’ at the end.
I
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
34840
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 116 / Friday, June 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Subchapter E—General Contracting
Requirements
PART 628—BONDS AND INSURANCE
9. Subpart 628.3 is revised to read as
follows:
I
Subpart 628.3—Insurance
Sec.
628.305 Overseas workers’ compensation
and war-hazard insurance.
628.309 Contract clauses for workers’
compensation insurance.
628.309–70 DOSAR provisions and clauses.
Subpart 628.3—Insurance
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
628.305 Overseas workers’ compensation
and war-hazard insurance.
(b)(1) Acquisitions for services,
including construction but excluding
personal services contracts, requiring
contractor personnel to perform work
outside of the United States, shall
include the contractual obligation for
coverage under the Defense Base Act (42
U.S.C. Sections 1651–1654, as
amended), for covered contractor
employees. For the purposes of this
section, ‘‘covered contractor employees’’
includes the following individuals:
(i) United States citizens or residents;
(ii) Individuals hired in the United
States or its possessions, regardless of
citizenship; and,
(iii) Local nationals and third country
nationals where contract performance
takes place in a country where there are
no local workers’ compensation laws.
(2) Individuals who are self-employed
(i.e., they have not incorporated) do not
meet the definition of an employee. No
Defense Base Act insurance is required
when contracting with these
individuals.
(3) Exceptions are discussed in
paragraphs (e)(1) and (f) of this section.
(c) The Department of State has
entered into a contract with an
insurance broker and carrier to provide
Defense Base Act insurance (at a fixed
rate for services and construction) to
cover DOS contracts that require
performance overseas by covered
contractor employees. Upon award of a
contract that requires Defense Base Act
insurance, the contracting officer shall
provide the contractor with the name of
the insurance broker from which the
contractor must acquire the Defense
Base Act insurance.
(d) The authority to recommend a
waiver from the Defense Base Act, as set
forth in FAR 28.305(d), is reserved to
the Secretary of State.
(e)(1) The Secretary of Labor has
waived the applicability of the Defense
Base Act to all DOS service contracts,
including construction, for contractor
employees who are local nationals or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Jun 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
third country nationals. This waiver is
conditioned on the requirement for the
contractor to provide workers’
compensation benefits against the risk
of work injury or death and assume
liability toward the employees and their
beneficiaries for war-hazard injury,
death, capture, or detention as
prescribed by the local workers’
compensation laws.
(2) In cases where a contract is
performed in a country where there are
no local workers’ compensation laws,
local and third country national
contractor employees are considered to
be ‘‘covered contractor employees’’, and
the contractor shall acquire Defense
Base Act insurance for those employees
pursuant to the contract between the
Department of State and the Defense
Base Act insurance broker.
(f)(1) Section 16 of the State
Department Basic Authorities Act (22
U.S.C. 2680a), as amended, provides
that the Defense Base Act shall not
apply with respect to such contracts as
the Secretary of State determines are
contracts with persons employed to
perform work for the Department of
State on an intermittent basis for not
more than 90 days in a calendar year.
The Department of State has established
that ‘‘persons’’ includes employees
hired by companies under contract with
the Department. The Procurement
Executive has the authority to issue the
waivers for employees who work on an
intermittent or short-term basis. Waivers
may be issued only for employees who
are U.S. citizens and residents, and only
where the contractor provides evidence
of alternative workers’ compensation
coverage for those employees. Waivers
may not be issued for local or third
country nationals.
(2) The contractor shall submit waiver
requests to the contracting officer. The
request shall contain the following
information:
(i) Contract number;
(ii) Name of contractor;
(iii) Brief description of the services to
be provided under the contract and
country of performance;
(iv) Name and position title of
individual(s);
(v) Nationality of individual(s) (must
be U.S. citizen or resident);
(vi) Dates (or timeframe) of
performance at the overseas location;
and
(vii) Evidence of alternative workers’
compensation coverage for these
employees (e.g., evidence that the State
workers’ compensation program covers
workers on short-term foreign
assignments).
(3) The contracting officer shall
review the request for completeness and
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
accuracy. If the request is complete and
accurate, the contracting officer shall
forward the request to the Procurement
Executive. If the contractor does not
provide complete and accurate
information, the contracting officer shall
return the request to the contractor with
an explanation as to what additional
information is required.
(4) The Procurement Executive shall
review requests for waiver forwarded by
the contracting officer and either
approve or disapprove the request. The
Procurement Executive shall return the
request indicating his/her approval or
disapproval to the contracting officer.
Any request that is not approved shall
describe the reason(s) why the request
was not approved. The contracting
officer shall provide the contractor with
the original of the approved or
disapproved document and maintain a
copy in the contract file.
628.309 Contract clauses for workers’
compensation insurance.
628.309–70
clauses.
DOSAR provisions and
(a) The contracting officer shall insert
the provision at 652.228–70, Defense
Base Act—Covered Contractor
Employees, in all solicitations for
services and construction to be
performed outside of the United States.
(b) The contracting officer shall insert
the clause at 652.228–71, Workers’
Compensation Insurance (Defense Base
Act)—Services, in solicitations and
contracts for services to be performed
outside of the United States when there
is a reasonable expectation that offers
will include covered contractor
employees, as defined in 628.305(b). If
the contracting officer is unsure as to
whether offers will include covered
contractor employees, the contracting
officer shall insert the clause. If the
contract is for construction, the
contracting officer shall insert the clause
with its Alternate I.
(c) The contracting officer shall insert
the provision at 652.228–74, Defense
Base Act Insurance Rates—Limitation,
in solicitations for services or
construction to be performed outside of
the United States when there is a
reasonable expectation that offers will
include covered contractor employees,
as defined in 628.305(b). If the
contracting officer is unsure as to
whether offers will include covered
contractor employees, the contracting
officer shall insert the provision.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
34841
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 116 / Friday, June 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Subchapter H—Clauses and Provisions
652.228–70 Defense Base Act—Covered
Contractor Employees.
Defense Base Act—Covered Contractor
Employees (MO/YR)
PART 652—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
As prescribed in 628.309–70(a), insert
the following provision:
(a) Bidders/offerors shall indicate below
whether or not any of the following
categories of employees will be employed on
the resultant contract, and, if so, the number
of such employees:
10. Section 652.228–70 is added to
read as follows:
I
Category
Yes/No
(1) United States citizens or residents
(2) Individuals hired in the United States, regardless of citizenship
(3) Local nationals or third country nationals where contract performance takes place in a
country where there are no local workers’ compensation laws.
........................................
(4) Local nationals or third country nationals where contract performance takes place in a
country where there are local workers’ compensation laws.
........................................
(b) The contracting officer has determined
that for performance in the country of
[contracting officer insert country of
performance and check the appropriate block
below]
b Workers’ compensation laws exist that
will cover local nationals and third country
nationals.
b Workers’ compensation laws do not
exist that will cover local nationals and third
country nationals.
(c) If the bidder/offeror has indicated ‘‘yes’’
in block (a)(4) of this provision, the bidder/
offeror shall not purchase Defense Base Act
insurance for those employees. However, the
bidder/offeror shall assume liability toward
the employees and their beneficiaries for
war-hazard injury, death, capture, or
detention, in accordance with the clause at
FAR 52.228–4.
(d) If the bidder/offeror has indicated ‘‘yes’’
in blocks (a)(1), (2), or (3) of this provision,
the bidder/offeror shall compute Defense
Base Act insurance costs covering those
employees pursuant to the terms of the
contract between the Department of State and
the Department’s Defense Base Act insurance
carrier at the rates specified in DOSAR
652.228–74, Defense Base Act Insurance
Rates—Limitation. If DOSAR provision
652.228–74 is not included in this
solicitation, the bidder/offeror shall notify
the contracting officer before the closing date
so that the solicitation can be amended
accordingly.
(End of provision)
11. Section 652.228–71 is revised to
read as follows:
I
652.228–71 Workers’ Compensation
Insurance (Defense Base Act)—Services.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
As prescribed in 628.309–70(b), insert
the following clause:
Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Defense
Base Act)—Services (MO/YR)
(a) This clause supplements FAR 52.228–
3. For the purposes of this clause, ‘‘covered
contractor employees’’ includes the following
individuals:
(1) United States citizens or residents;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:45 Jun 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
(2) Individuals hired in the United States
or its possessions, regardless of citizenship;
and
(3) Local nationals and third country
nationals where contract performance takes
place in a country where there are no local
workers’ compensation laws.
(b) The Contractor shall procure Defense
Base Act (DBA) insurance pursuant to the
terms of the contract between the Department
of State and the Department’s DBA insurance
carrier for covered contractor employees,
unless the Contractor has a DBA selfinsurance program approved by the
Department of Labor. The Contractor shall
submit a copy of the Department of Labor’s
approval to the contracting officer upon
contract award, if applicable.
(c) The current rate under the Department
of State contract is [contracting officer insert
rate] of compensation for services.
(d) The Contractor shall insert a clause
substantially the same as this in all
subcontracts. The Contractor shall require
that subcontractors insert a similar clause in
any of their subcontracts.
(e) Should the rates for DBA insurance
coverage increase or decrease during the
performance of this contract, the contracting
officer shall modify this contract accordingly.
(f) The Contractor shall demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the contracting officer that the
equitable adjustment as a result of the
insurance increase or decrease does not
include any reserve for such insurance.
Adjustment shall not include any overhead,
profit, general and administrative expenses,
etc.
(g)(1) Section 16 of the State Department
Basic Authorities Act (22 U.S.C. 2680a), as
amended, provides that the Defense Base Act
shall not apply with respect to such contracts
as the Secretary of State determines are
contracts with persons employed to perform
work for the Department of State on an
intermittent basis for not more than 90 days
in a calendar year. ‘‘Persons’’ includes
individuals hired by companies under
contract with the Department. The
Procurement Executive has the authority to
issue the waivers for Contractor employees
who work on an intermittent or short-term
basis.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Number
Local nationals:
llllllllll
Third country nationals:
llllllllll
Local nationals:
llllllllll
Third country nationals:
llllllllll
(2) The Contractor shall submit waiver
requests to the contracting officer. The
request shall contain the following
information:
(i) Contract number;
(ii) Name of Contractor;
(iii) Brief description of the services to be
provided under the contract and country of
performance;
(iv) Name and position title of
individual(s);
(v) Nationality of individual(s) (must be
U.S. citizen or U.S. resident);
(vi) Dates (or timeframe) of performance at
the overseas location; and,
(vii) Evidence of alternative workers’
compensation coverage for these employees
(e.g., evidence that the State workers’
compensation program covers workers on
short-term foreign assignments).
(3) The contracting officer shall provide to
the Contractor the original of the approved or
disapproved document and maintain a copy
in the contract file.
(End of clause)
Alternate I. (MO/YR) If the contract is
for construction, as prescribed in
628.309–70(b), substitute the following
paragraph (c) for paragraph (c) of the
basic clause:
(c) The current rate under the
Department of State contract is
[contracting officer insert rate] of
compensation for construction.
I 12. Section 652.228–74 is revised to
read as follows:
652.228–74 Defense Base Act Insurance
Rates—Limitation.
As prescribed in 628.309–70(c), insert
the following provision:
Defense Base Act Insurance Rates—
Limitation (MO/YR)
(a) The Department of State has entered
into a contract with an insurance carrier to
provide Defense Base Act (DBA) insurance to
Department of State covered contractor
employees at a contracted rate. For the
purposes of this provision, ‘‘covered
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
34842
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 116 / Friday, June 16, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
contractor employees’’ includes the following
individuals:
(1) United States citizens or residents;
(2) Individuals hired in the United States
or its possessions, regardless of citizenship;
and
(3) Local nationals and third country
nationals where contract performance takes
place in a country where there are no local
workers’ compensation laws.
(b) In preparing the cost proposal, the
bidder/offeror shall use the following rates in
computing the cost for DBA insurance:
Services @[contracting officer insert
current rate] of compensation; or
Construction @[contracting officer insert
current rate] of compensation.
(c) Bidders/offerors shall compute the total
compensation (direct salary plus differential,
but excluding per diem, housing allowance
and other miscellaneous allowances) to be
paid to covered contractor employees and the
cost of the DBA insurance in their bid/offer
using the foregoing rate. Bidders/offerors
shall include the estimated DBA insurance
costs in their proposed total fixed price or
estimated cost. However, the DBA insurance
costs shall be identified in a separate line
item in the bid/proposal.
(End of provision)
652.228–75 and 652.228–76
[Removed]
13. Sections 652.228–75 and 652.228–
76 are removed.
I
Dated: June 6, 2006.
Corey M. Rindner,
Procurement Executive, Bureau of
Administration, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–9502 Filed 6–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 060608158–6158–01; I.D.
051806E]
RIN 0648–AU47
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery;
Emergency Rule
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
SUMMARY: NMFS is implementing an
observer service provider program for
the Atlantic sea scallop (scallop) fishery
including criteria for becoming an
approved observer service provider,
observer certification criteria,
decertification criteria, and observer
16:45 Jun 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
Effective from June 16, 2006
through December 13, 2006. Comments
must be received at the appropriate
address or fax number (see ADDRESSES)
by 5 p.m., local time, on July 17, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Mail: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Northeast
Regional Office, One Blackburn Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside
of the envelope, ‘‘Comments on Scallop
Emergency Action.’’
• Email: ScallopAU47@noaa.gov
• Fax: (978) 281–9135
• Electronically through the Federal
e-Rulemaking portal: http//
www.regulations.gov.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimate or other aspects of
the collection-of-information
requirement contained in this proposed
rule should be submitted to the Regional
Administrator at the address above and
by e-mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
(202) 395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter W. Christopher, Fishery Policy
Analyst, 978–281–9288; fax 978–281–
9135.
DATES:
Since
1999, NMFS has required scallop
vessels operating in Sea Scallop Access
Areas (Access Areas) to pay for observer
coverage. The Scallop FMP requires
vessel owners to provide advance
notification to NMFS of upcoming
scallop trips. This information is used to
select trips on which an at-sea observer
will be deployed. Observers were
deployed through a contractual
arrangement between NMFS and an
observer provider until June 2004. The
contractual arrangement was not
renewed at that time because of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; emergency
interim rule and request for comments.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
deployment logistics. Through this
emergency rule, NMFS is re-activating
the industry-funded observer program
implemented under the Atlantic Sea
Scallop Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) through a scallop total allowable
catch (TAC) and days-at-sea (DAS) setaside program that helps vessel owners
defray the cost of carrying observers.
Under this emergency action, scallop
vessel owners, operators, or vessel
managers are required to procure
certified fishery observers for specified
scallop fishing trips from an approved
observer service provider. This
emergency rule maintains the existing
requirements for scallop vessel owners
to pay for observers whether or not
scallop TAC or DAS set-aside is
available.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
unresolved concerns regarding use of a
sole contractor to administer the
industry-funded observer program. The
prior contract arrangement had enabled
vessel owners to pay the observer
contractor directly for observer
deployments, with details of the
observer deployment requirements
specified through the contract. The
expiration of the contract arrangement
eliminated the mechanism that allowed
vessel owners to make these payments
and, in the absence of this contractual
program, NMFS did not require vessel
owners to pay for the cost of observers.
Thus, NMFS has not utilized the
observer set-aside program since 2004.
Observer coverage in the scallop
fishery is necessary to monitor the
bycatch of finfish, including yellowtail
flounder, skates, monkfish, cod, and
other species. Monitoring of yellowtail
flounder bycatch in the Scallop Access
Areas within the year-round closed
areas under the Northeast (NE)
Multispecies FMP is of particular
concern because the scallop fishery is
constrained by a fishery-specific TAC of
yellowtail flounder, which is part of the
stock-wide yellowtail flounder TACs set
by the NE Multispecies FMP to achieve
specified mortality targets for the
species. Observer coverage is also
needed to monitor interactions of the
scallop fishery with endangered and
threatened sea turtles.
Through fiscal year (FY) 2005, the
Northeast Fisheries Science Center
(NEFSC) funded the necessary levels of
observer coverage in the sea scallop
fishery to evaluate bycatch of
groundfish and sea turtles by utilizing
observer funding that was carried over
from FY 2004. However, in FY 2006 the
NEFSC’s level of funding for the
observer program is sufficient to provide
only minimal observer coverage in the
scallop fishery. The NEFSC did not
receive its observer program budget
until February 2006 and has been
working to reconcile the shortfall ever
since. In April 2006 NMFS determined
that it could not reconcile the reduced
level of observer coverage in the scallop
fishery with available budget.
Consequently, without the program
established through this emergency rule,
observer coverage would be constrained
to levels below those recommended in
the Scallop FMP for precise estimates of
yellowtail flounder bycatch TAC in
Access Areas. In addition, the lower
level of coverage could make it more
difficult to monitor and estimate
interactions between the scallop fishery
and sea turtles in the Mid-Atlantic,
particularly during the June through
October period, when such interactions
are most likely.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 116 (Friday, June 16, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34836-34842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-9502]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
48 CFR Parts 601, 611, 619, 622, 628, and 652
[Public Notice 5444]
RIN 1400-AB90
Rule Title: Department of State Acquisition Regulation
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule makes final a proposed rule issued on December 22,
2004, with several revisions. It revises the DOSAR to formalize
Department policy regarding the application of the Small Business Act
to contracts awarded by domestic contracting activities where contract
performance takes place overseas; and, revises the coverage regarding
Defense Base Act insurance. The final rule also contains several
miscellaneous amendments and corrections not published on December 22,
2004, as outlined below. The Department received public comments from
three sources on the proposed rule, which are discussed below.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective June 16, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gladys Gines, Procurement Analyst,
Department of State, Office of the Procurement Executive, 2201 C
Street, NW., Suite 603, State Annex Number 6, Washington, DC 20522-
0602; e-mail address: ginesgg@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department published a proposed rule,
Public Notice 4938 at 69 FR 76660, December 22, 2004, with a request
for comments, amending Parts 619, 625, 628, and 652 of Title 48 of the
Code of Federal Regulations. The rule made three changes to the DOSAR:
(1) Formalized policy regarding the application of the Small Business
Act to contracts awarded by domestic contracting activities where
contract performance takes place overseas; (2) added language to deal
with U.S. Government support to contractors performing overseas; and
(3) revised the coverage regarding Defense Base Act insurance. The
proposed rule was discussed in detail in Public Notice 4938. The
Department is now promulgating a final rule with changes from the
proposed rule.
In particular, the Department is not finalizing that part of the
proposed rule dealing with U.S. Government support to contractors
performing overseas. The Department of Defense published a final rule
on May 5, 2005 (70 FR 23790). That final rule contained a clause for
use in
[[Page 34837]]
DOD contracts that require contractor personnel to deploy with, or
otherwise provide support in the theater of operations, to U.S.
military forces deployed outside the United States in contingency
operations, humanitarian or peacekeeping operations, or other military
operations or exercises designated by the combatant commander. The
State Department's proposed rule language was, in part, based on this
DOD rule. However, in the interim, the FAR Council has determined that
coverage for DOD, State, and other agencies regarding contractor
support outside the United States is necessary for those services that
are not in direct support of a deployed military force, e.g.,
reconstruction efforts. A FAR case is being developed to deal with U.S.
Government support to contractors operating overseas. The Department of
State intends to follow the FAR language when promulgated; therefore,
separate DOSAR language will not be required.
The final rule also contains several amendments and corrections
that were not published as part of the proposed rule. They are as
follows:
DOSAR 601.106 is revised to add the information collection
number and burden estimate for Department of State Form DS-4053,
Department of State Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Application.
DOSAR 601.603-70(b) is revised to add an additional DOS
office that has been delegated limited procurement authority.
DOSAR 611.502 is corrected to read 611.501. The FAR
citation of 11.502(d) is corrected to read FAR 11.501(d).
DOSAR 619.803-71(b) is revised to change the reference to
the Small Business Administration's PRO-Net database to the Central
Contractor Registration (CCR) database. The CCR database is now the
official source of vendor data for the Government.
DOSAR 619.811-3 is revised to remove the reference to
Alternate III of FAR clause 52.219-18, Notification of Competition
Limited to Eligible 8(a) Concerns. There is no Alternate III to FAR
52.219-18.
DOSAR 622.604-2 is revised to correct a citation.
These amendments and corrections do not affect the public, and
therefore good cause exists to publish the amendments for effect
without first soliciting public comment because prior public comment is
unnecessary. The amendments are for the purpose of implementing
internal changes and making minor corrections.
Analysis of Comments: The proposed rule was published for comment
on December 22, 2004 (69 FR 76660). The comment period closed on
February 22, 2005. The Department received comments from three sources.
The following is a synopsis of the Department's response to the public
comments and any changes made to the rule as a result. The comments are
grouped by topic.
I. Comments Regarding the Application of the Small Business Act
1. Comment: One commentator disagreed that the language of FAR
19.000(b) is ambiguous, and questioned the Department's policy of
applying the Small Business Act to contracts awarded domestically and
performed overseas. The commentator pointed out that no other agency
has made such an interpretation.
Response: Nonconcur. The Department does consider the language of
FAR 19.000(b), which states that FAR Part 19, with the exception of
Subpart 19.6, applies ``only in the United States or its outlying
areas'', to be ambiguous. The application of the Small Business Act to
contracts awarded domestically for performance overseas has been a
longstanding practice at the Department of State; this rule merely
formalizes that practice.
2. Comment: One commentator stated that if the Department
implemented the proposed language, it should adopt a regime that
reflects the realities of work in a contingency operation or high risk
location and that is directly related to the instant procurement
requirement.
Response: Partially Concur. The Department already does this. DOSAR
619.201(d)(5) requires that the Office of Small and Disadvantaged
Utilization (A/SDBU) review requests for acquisitions exceeding the
simplified acquisition threshold ($100,000), and task and delivery
orders exceeding $2 million. The capabilities and capacities of small
businesses to perform on any given acquisition, including those in
contingency or high risk locations, are taken into consideration by A/
SDBU when making set-aside recommendations. Since this requirement is
already in the DOSAR, no change to the rule is necessary.
3. Comment: One commentator expressed confusion regarding what the
Department meant by the term ``legislatively specified categories''.
Response: Concur. The term ``legislatively specified categories''
refers to the small business programs under the Small Business Act,
namely, small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns,
service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, 8(a) concerns,
women-owned small business concerns, small disadvantaged business
concerns, and veteran-owned small business concerns. However, to avoid
confusion, this term has been removed from the final rule.
4. Comment: One commentator recommended revising the last sentence
of proposed 619.000(b) to state: ``Contracts that are both awarded and
performed outside the United States should comply on a voluntary
basis.''
Response: Concur. The sentence has been revised accordingly.
5. Comment: One commentator questioned the practicality of the
proposed rule, citing the requirement for subcontracting plans and
goals and questioning how goals will be negotiated. The commentator
questioned how the Department would reconcile these small business
subcontracting goals with U.S. treaty obligations and the frequent U.S.
foreign policy goal of requiring U.S. contractors to use host country
businesses and resources.
Response: Nonconcur. As indicated previously, this policy is not
new. In point of fact, the Department has not experienced difficulties
in implementing this policy. FAR 19.702(b) states that subcontracting
plans are not required for contracts that will be performed entirely
outside of the United States, so contracts that are performed overseas
are already exempted from the subcontracting plan requirements.
Additionally, the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act
(Public Law 99-399) stipulates that ten percent of the monies
appropriated for diplomatic security should, to the extent practicable,
be awarded to minority owned business concerns, and another 10 percent
to small businesses. In making any set-aside recommendations, A/SDBU
takes into account all of the issues raised by the commentator,
including any limitations that foreign governments may impose. No
change to the rule is therefore necessary.
6. Comment: One commentator suggested that, instead of applying the
policy, the Department use small business performance as a competitive
evaluation factor in appropriate solicitations.
Response: Partially Concur. The Department already does this. DOSAR
619.705-3 encourages contracting officers to consider the adequacy of
subcontracting plans and/or past performance in achieving negotiated
goals, as part of the overall evaluation of proposals. Since this
requirement is already in the DOSAR, no change to the rule is
necessary.
[[Page 34838]]
7. Comment: One commentator recommended that the Department conduct
a public meeting to discuss the rule, as well as separate this revision
from the other parts of the proposed rule.
Response: Nonconcur. The Department does not see the need for a
public meeting, nor to separate this from the rest of the rule. As
indicated previously, this has been a longstanding practice and the
Department has not experienced any difficulties in its implementation.
II. Comments Regarding Defense Base Act (DBA) Insurance
1. Comment: One commentator expressed concern about how vendors
would know, at the time of the solicitation, whether a country has a
workers' compensation law.
Response: Concur. The Department agrees that this information
should be provided by the Government in the solicitation. The
solicitation provision at 652.228-70 has been revised so that the
contracting officer will check a block to indicate if a country does or
does not have such laws.
2. Comment: One commentator requested that the rule be revised so
that contractors would be allowed to purchase their own Defense Base
Act insurance rather than use the insurance broker that the Department
has under contract.
Response: Nonconcur. The contract with the insurance broker is a
requirements contract. This means that the Department has an obligation
to require that its contractors purchase all of their DBA insurance
from the insurance broker. In addition, the Department has negotiated
more favorable rates since the contractor has been assured of the
volume of work. Since the cost of the DBA insurance premiums is a
direct reimbursable cost under the Department's contracts, contractors
do not incur additional costs in procuring the DBA insurance from the
Department's contractor.
3. Comment: All commentators, including the Department of Labor
(DOL), expressed concern regarding the coverage on Section 16 of the
State Department Basic Authorities Act. This statutory provision
provides that the Defense Base Act shall not apply with respect to such
contracts as the Secretary of State determines are contracts with
persons employed to perform work for the Department on an intermittent
basis for not more than 90 days in a calendar year. Specifically,
commentators pointed out that the rule did not address how to request a
waiver, under what circumstances a waiver would be approved, how the
Department would notify exempted individuals, and what workers'
compensation coverage these exempted employees would have.
Response: Concur. The Department agrees that more detail is
required. The language in the State Department Basic Authorities Act
was added in the early 1980s, before the Department had a contract with
an insurance broker for DBA insurance. At that time, contractors that
had short-term contracts with the Department for overseas performance
were paying relatively high DBA insurance premiums. However, State
worker's compensation programs protected workers based in that State
when they performed short out-of-state assignments, even foreign
assignments. Since the workers had the protection of the State's
workers' compensation law, additional DBA insurance was not needed for
these short-term assignments.
In response to these comments, the Department has revised the
language of the proposed rule to: (1) List the information that a
contractor must submit in order for a waiver to be considered; (2)
conditioned the waiver on the contractor's presentation of evidence of
alternative workers' compensation coverage (e.g., from the State); and
(3) limited the waiver to U.S. citizens and residents, not local or
third country nationals. We believe that these changes address the
concerns raised regarding what coverage these exempted employees would
have. We also have added language that the contracting officer will
provide the contractor with the original of any approved waivers,
thereby addressing the concern of how contractors will be notified. The
Department believes that since we now have a contract with an insurance
broker for DBA insurance at reasonable rates, requests for waivers
should be rare.
To further clarify DBA coverage, we have added language, based on
guidance from DOL, that individuals who are self-employed (i.e., are
not incorporated) do not meet the definition of an employee; therefore,
no DBA insurance is required when contracting with these individuals.
The language was added because the Department does contract with
individuals (e.g., eligible family members) to perform tasks (e.g.,
prepare a monthly embassy newsletter), and the question was raised as
to whether these individuals needed to procure DBA insurance.
4. Comment: The paragraph numbering of proposed DOSAR 628.305 is
incorrect. The paragraphs are numbered (b) through (f) instead of (a)
through (e).
Response: Nonconcur. The DOSAR follows the FAR numbering
convention. We are implementing paragraphs (b) through (e) of the FAR,
but not implementing paragraph (a) of FAR 28.305, since that paragraph
(a) is merely a definition of ``public-work contract.''
5. Comment: DOL supports the new definition of ``covered contractor
employees'', as well as the acknowledgement that local and third
country nationals are covered by DBA if there is no local workers'
compensation law.
Response: Concur. No revision is necessary.
6. Comment: One commentator recommended that in the clause
prescriptions at DOSAR 628.309-70(a) and (b), we retain the reference
to 628.309(b) only in both instances, as opposed to (b)(1). By only
referring to (b)(1), we have unintentionally excluded the recognized
exceptions to coverage that are cross-referenced in 628.305(b)(2).
Response: Concur. We have revised the section accordingly.
7. Comment: One commentator recommended that we either delete the
repetitious definition of ``covered contractor employee'' in the
provision at 652.228-74 and simply provide a cross-reference to the
language at 628.305(a), or add at the end of paragraph (a) of 652.228-
74 a new sentence that recognizes the exception for intermittent
employees where the Procurement Executive has granted a waiver.
Response: Nonconcur. We believe that it is important to have the
definition of ``covered contractor employee'' in the solicitation
provision so that vendors will not have to refer back to other parts of
the regulation. At the time of the solicitation, vendors will not know
whether they will have any exempted employees, since any waiver is
approved after contract award. They will need to include the DBA
insurance costs for those employees in terms of preparing their cost
proposal. Should a waiver be approved after contract award, the
contractor simply would not request reimbursement for any employees
that are exempted under the waiver, since the DBA insurance costs are a
direct reimbursable cost under the contract.
8. Comment: One commentator recommended that the Department conduct
a public meeting to discuss the rule, as well as separate this revision
from the other parts of the proposed rule.
[[Page 34839]]
Response: Nonconcur. The Department does not see the need for a
public meeting, nor to separate this from the rest of the rule. As
indicated, most of the comments regarding the DBA coverage center
around the waiver for intermittent employees, and the Department
believes that these waivers will be a rare occurrence.
III. Comments Regarding U.S. Government Support to Contractors Overseas
The Department received numerous comments regarding this section of
the proposed rule. However, since the Department is rescinding this
part of the proposed rule, and will adopt the FAR language, no
discussion of the comments is required. The public will have an
opportunity to comment on the FAR language.
Regulatory Findings
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is publishing this rule as a final rule with changes
after it was published as a proposed rule on December 22, 2004 (see
Supplementary Information).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of State, in accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed this regulation and, by
approving it, certifies that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $1
million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary
under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996. This rule will not
result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign
based companies in domestic and import markets.
Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6
of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Review
This regulation has been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Information collection requirements have been approved under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 by OMB, and have been assigned OMB
control number 1405-0050. The information and recordkeeping
requirements for Form DS-4053, Department of State Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Application, have been approved by OMB
under OMB Control Number 1405-0161.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 601, 611, 619, 622, 628, 652
Government procurement.
0
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, title 48,
chapter 6 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 601, 611, 619, 622, 628, and
652 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 22 U.S.C. 2658.
Subchapter A--General
PART 601--DEPARTMENT OF STATE ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM
0
2. Section 601.106 is amended by adding the following sentence at the
end:
601.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
* * * The information and recordkeeping requirements for Form DS-
4053, Department of State Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program
Application, have been approved by OMB under OMB Control Number 1405-
0161; the burden estimate is 294 hours.
0
3. Section 601.603-70 is amended by adding a new paragraph (b)(8) to
read as follows:
601.603-70 Delegations of authority.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(8) Bureau of Administration, Office of Operations. The authority
to enter into and administer simplified acquisition transactions for
emergency or contingency operations necessary to protect life or
federal property. This authority is limited to cases when a contracting
officer in the Office of Acquisitions Management is unavailable.
Subchapter B--Competition and Acquisition Planning
PART 611--DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
611.502 [Redesignated as 611.501] and 611.501 [Amended]
0
4. Section 611.502 is redesignated as section 611.501. New section
611.501 is amended by correcting the citation at the end of paragraph
(d) to read ``FAR 11.501(d).''
Subchapter D--Socioeconomic Programs
PART 619--SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
0
5. A new section 619.000 is added to read as follows:
619.000 Scope of part.
(b) It is the Department's policy to provide maximum opportunities
for U.S. small businesses to participate in the acquisition process.
DOS contracts that are awarded domestically for performance overseas
shall be subject to the Small Business Act as a matter of policy.
Contracts that are both awarded and performed overseas should comply on
a voluntary basis.
619.803-71 [Amended]
0
6. Section 619.803-71 is amended by removing the words ``SBA's PRO-Net
database on the Internet (https://www.sba.gov)'' and inserting the words
``Central Contractor Registration database (https://www.ccr.gov)'' in
their place in paragraph (b).
619.811-3 [Amended]
0
7. Section 619.811-3 is amended by removing the words ``with its
Alternate III'' in paragraph (d)(3).
PART 622--APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS
622.604-2 [Amended]
0
8. Section 622.604-2 is amended by revising the citation to read ``FAR
22.604-2(b)(1)'' at the end.
[[Page 34840]]
Subchapter E--General Contracting Requirements
PART 628--BONDS AND INSURANCE
0
9. Subpart 628.3 is revised to read as follows:
Subpart 628.3--Insurance
Sec.
628.305 Overseas workers' compensation and war-hazard insurance.
628.309 Contract clauses for workers' compensation insurance.
628.309-70 DOSAR provisions and clauses.
Subpart 628.3--Insurance
628.305 Overseas workers' compensation and war-hazard insurance.
(b)(1) Acquisitions for services, including construction but
excluding personal services contracts, requiring contractor personnel
to perform work outside of the United States, shall include the
contractual obligation for coverage under the Defense Base Act (42
U.S.C. Sections 1651-1654, as amended), for covered contractor
employees. For the purposes of this section, ``covered contractor
employees'' includes the following individuals:
(i) United States citizens or residents;
(ii) Individuals hired in the United States or its possessions,
regardless of citizenship; and,
(iii) Local nationals and third country nationals where contract
performance takes place in a country where there are no local workers'
compensation laws.
(2) Individuals who are self-employed (i.e., they have not
incorporated) do not meet the definition of an employee. No Defense
Base Act insurance is required when contracting with these individuals.
(3) Exceptions are discussed in paragraphs (e)(1) and (f) of this
section.
(c) The Department of State has entered into a contract with an
insurance broker and carrier to provide Defense Base Act insurance (at
a fixed rate for services and construction) to cover DOS contracts that
require performance overseas by covered contractor employees. Upon
award of a contract that requires Defense Base Act insurance, the
contracting officer shall provide the contractor with the name of the
insurance broker from which the contractor must acquire the Defense
Base Act insurance.
(d) The authority to recommend a waiver from the Defense Base Act,
as set forth in FAR 28.305(d), is reserved to the Secretary of State.
(e)(1) The Secretary of Labor has waived the applicability of the
Defense Base Act to all DOS service contracts, including construction,
for contractor employees who are local nationals or third country
nationals. This waiver is conditioned on the requirement for the
contractor to provide workers' compensation benefits against the risk
of work injury or death and assume liability toward the employees and
their beneficiaries for war-hazard injury, death, capture, or detention
as prescribed by the local workers' compensation laws.
(2) In cases where a contract is performed in a country where there
are no local workers' compensation laws, local and third country
national contractor employees are considered to be ``covered contractor
employees'', and the contractor shall acquire Defense Base Act
insurance for those employees pursuant to the contract between the
Department of State and the Defense Base Act insurance broker.
(f)(1) Section 16 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act (22
U.S.C. 2680a), as amended, provides that the Defense Base Act shall not
apply with respect to such contracts as the Secretary of State
determines are contracts with persons employed to perform work for the
Department of State on an intermittent basis for not more than 90 days
in a calendar year. The Department of State has established that
``persons'' includes employees hired by companies under contract with
the Department. The Procurement Executive has the authority to issue
the waivers for employees who work on an intermittent or short-term
basis. Waivers may be issued only for employees who are U.S. citizens
and residents, and only where the contractor provides evidence of
alternative workers' compensation coverage for those employees. Waivers
may not be issued for local or third country nationals.
(2) The contractor shall submit waiver requests to the contracting
officer. The request shall contain the following information:
(i) Contract number;
(ii) Name of contractor;
(iii) Brief description of the services to be provided under the
contract and country of performance;
(iv) Name and position title of individual(s);
(v) Nationality of individual(s) (must be U.S. citizen or
resident);
(vi) Dates (or timeframe) of performance at the overseas location;
and
(vii) Evidence of alternative workers' compensation coverage for
these employees (e.g., evidence that the State workers' compensation
program covers workers on short-term foreign assignments).
(3) The contracting officer shall review the request for
completeness and accuracy. If the request is complete and accurate, the
contracting officer shall forward the request to the Procurement
Executive. If the contractor does not provide complete and accurate
information, the contracting officer shall return the request to the
contractor with an explanation as to what additional information is
required.
(4) The Procurement Executive shall review requests for waiver
forwarded by the contracting officer and either approve or disapprove
the request. The Procurement Executive shall return the request
indicating his/her approval or disapproval to the contracting officer.
Any request that is not approved shall describe the reason(s) why the
request was not approved. The contracting officer shall provide the
contractor with the original of the approved or disapproved document
and maintain a copy in the contract file.
628.309 Contract clauses for workers' compensation insurance.
628.309-70 DOSAR provisions and clauses.
(a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 652.228-
70, Defense Base Act--Covered Contractor Employees, in all
solicitations for services and construction to be performed outside of
the United States.
(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 652.228-71,
Workers' Compensation Insurance (Defense Base Act)--Services, in
solicitations and contracts for services to be performed outside of the
United States when there is a reasonable expectation that offers will
include covered contractor employees, as defined in 628.305(b). If the
contracting officer is unsure as to whether offers will include covered
contractor employees, the contracting officer shall insert the clause.
If the contract is for construction, the contracting officer shall
insert the clause with its Alternate I.
(c) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 652.228-
74, Defense Base Act Insurance Rates--Limitation, in solicitations for
services or construction to be performed outside of the United States
when there is a reasonable expectation that offers will include covered
contractor employees, as defined in 628.305(b). If the contracting
officer is unsure as to whether offers will include covered contractor
employees, the contracting officer shall insert the provision.
[[Page 34841]]
Subchapter H--Clauses and Provisions
PART 652--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
10. Section 652.228-70 is added to read as follows:
652.228-70 Defense Base Act--Covered Contractor Employees.
As prescribed in 628.309-70(a), insert the following provision:
Defense Base Act--Covered Contractor Employees (MO/YR)
(a) Bidders/offerors shall indicate below whether or not any of
the following categories of employees will be employed on the
resultant contract, and, if so, the number of such employees:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Yes/No Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) United States citizens or
residents
(2) Individuals hired in the United
States, regardless of citizenship
(3) Local nationals or third ..................................... Local nationals:
country nationals where contract --------------------
performance takes place in a Third country nationals:
country where there are no local --------------------
workers' compensation laws.
(4) Local nationals or third ..................................... Local nationals:
country nationals where contract --------------------
performance takes place in a Third country nationals:
country where there are local --------------------
workers' compensation laws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) The contracting officer has determined that for performance
in the country of [contracting officer insert country of performance
and check the appropriate block below]
[squ] Workers' compensation laws exist that will cover local
nationals and third country nationals.
[squ] Workers' compensation laws do not exist that will cover
local nationals and third country nationals.
(c) If the bidder/offeror has indicated ``yes'' in block (a)(4)
of this provision, the bidder/offeror shall not purchase Defense
Base Act insurance for those employees. However, the bidder/offeror
shall assume liability toward the employees and their beneficiaries
for war-hazard injury, death, capture, or detention, in accordance
with the clause at FAR 52.228-4.
(d) If the bidder/offeror has indicated ``yes'' in blocks
(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this provision, the bidder/offeror shall
compute Defense Base Act insurance costs covering those employees
pursuant to the terms of the contract between the Department of
State and the Department's Defense Base Act insurance carrier at the
rates specified in DOSAR 652.228-74, Defense Base Act Insurance
Rates--Limitation. If DOSAR provision 652.228-74 is not included in
this solicitation, the bidder/offeror shall notify the contracting
officer before the closing date so that the solicitation can be
amended accordingly.
(End of provision)
0
11. Section 652.228-71 is revised to read as follows:
652.228-71 Workers' Compensation Insurance (Defense Base Act)--
Services.
As prescribed in 628.309-70(b), insert the following clause:
Workers' Compensation Insurance (Defense Base Act)--Services (MO/YR)
(a) This clause supplements FAR 52.228-3. For the purposes of
this clause, ``covered contractor employees'' includes the following
individuals:
(1) United States citizens or residents;
(2) Individuals hired in the United States or its possessions,
regardless of citizenship; and
(3) Local nationals and third country nationals where contract
performance takes place in a country where there are no local
workers' compensation laws.
(b) The Contractor shall procure Defense Base Act (DBA)
insurance pursuant to the terms of the contract between the
Department of State and the Department's DBA insurance carrier for
covered contractor employees, unless the Contractor has a DBA self-
insurance program approved by the Department of Labor. The
Contractor shall submit a copy of the Department of Labor's approval
to the contracting officer upon contract award, if applicable.
(c) The current rate under the Department of State contract is
[contracting officer insert rate] of compensation for services.
(d) The Contractor shall insert a clause substantially the same
as this in all subcontracts. The Contractor shall require that
subcontractors insert a similar clause in any of their subcontracts.
(e) Should the rates for DBA insurance coverage increase or
decrease during the performance of this contract, the contracting
officer shall modify this contract accordingly.
(f) The Contractor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
contracting officer that the equitable adjustment as a result of the
insurance increase or decrease does not include any reserve for such
insurance. Adjustment shall not include any overhead, profit,
general and administrative expenses, etc.
(g)(1) Section 16 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act
(22 U.S.C. 2680a), as amended, provides that the Defense Base Act
shall not apply with respect to such contracts as the Secretary of
State determines are contracts with persons employed to perform work
for the Department of State on an intermittent basis for not more
than 90 days in a calendar year. ``Persons'' includes individuals
hired by companies under contract with the Department. The
Procurement Executive has the authority to issue the waivers for
Contractor employees who work on an intermittent or short-term
basis.
(2) The Contractor shall submit waiver requests to the
contracting officer. The request shall contain the following
information:
(i) Contract number;
(ii) Name of Contractor;
(iii) Brief description of the services to be provided under the
contract and country of performance;
(iv) Name and position title of individual(s);
(v) Nationality of individual(s) (must be U.S. citizen or U.S.
resident);
(vi) Dates (or timeframe) of performance at the overseas
location; and,
(vii) Evidence of alternative workers' compensation coverage for
these employees (e.g., evidence that the State workers' compensation
program covers workers on short-term foreign assignments).
(3) The contracting officer shall provide to the Contractor the
original of the approved or disapproved document and maintain a copy
in the contract file.
(End of clause)
Alternate I. (MO/YR) If the contract is for construction, as
prescribed in 628.309-70(b), substitute the following paragraph (c) for
paragraph (c) of the basic clause:
(c) The current rate under the Department of State contract is
[contracting officer insert rate] of compensation for construction.
0
12. Section 652.228-74 is revised to read as follows:
652.228-74 Defense Base Act Insurance Rates--Limitation.
As prescribed in 628.309-70(c), insert the following provision:
Defense Base Act Insurance Rates--Limitation (MO/YR)
(a) The Department of State has entered into a contract with an
insurance carrier to provide Defense Base Act (DBA) insurance to
Department of State covered contractor employees at a contracted
rate. For the purposes of this provision, ``covered
[[Page 34842]]
contractor employees'' includes the following individuals:
(1) United States citizens or residents;
(2) Individuals hired in the United States or its possessions,
regardless of citizenship; and
(3) Local nationals and third country nationals where contract
performance takes place in a country where there are no local
workers' compensation laws.
(b) In preparing the cost proposal, the bidder/offeror shall use
the following rates in computing the cost for DBA insurance:
Services @[contracting officer insert current rate] of
compensation; or
Construction @[contracting officer insert current rate] of
compensation.
(c) Bidders/offerors shall compute the total compensation
(direct salary plus differential, but excluding per diem, housing
allowance and other miscellaneous allowances) to be paid to covered
contractor employees and the cost of the DBA insurance in their bid/
offer using the foregoing rate. Bidders/offerors shall include the
estimated DBA insurance costs in their proposed total fixed price or
estimated cost. However, the DBA insurance costs shall be identified
in a separate line item in the bid/proposal.
(End of provision)
652.228-75 and 652.228-76 [Removed]
0
13. Sections 652.228-75 and 652.228-76 are removed.
Dated: June 6, 2006.
Corey M. Rindner,
Procurement Executive, Bureau of Administration, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6-9502 Filed 6-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P