Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; SYMLIN, 34945-34946 [E6-9414]
Download as PDF
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 116 / Friday, June 16, 2006 / Notices
INSPRA is 2,135 days. Of this time,
1,832 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 303 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355) became effective: November 24,
1996. FDA has verified the applicant’s
claim that the date the investigational
new drug application became effective
was on November 24, 1996.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: November 29, 2001.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the new drug application (NDA) for
Inspra (NDA 21–437) was initially
submitted on November 29, 2001.
3. The date the application was
approved: September 27, 2002. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
21–437 was approved on September 27,
2002.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,218 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by August 15, 2006.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
December 13, 2006. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document.
Comments and petitions may be seen in
the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:25 Jun 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
Dated: May 17, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6–9412 Filed 6–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2006E–0022]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; SYMLIN
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
SYMLIN and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law.
FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–007), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the human drug
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34945
product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the human drug product and continues
until FDA grants permission to market
the drug product. Although only a
portion of a regulatory review period
may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of Patents
and Trademarks may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted, as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product SYMLIN
(pramlintide acetate). SYMLIN is given
at mealtimes and is indicated for Type
1 diabetes, as an adjunct treatment in
patients who use mealtime insulin
therapy and who have failed to achieve
desired glucose control despite optimal
insulin therapy, and for Type 2 diabetes,
as an adjunct treatment in patients who
use mealtime insulin therapy and who
have failed to achieve desired glucose
control despite optimal insulin therapy,
with or without a concurrent
sulfonylurea agent and/or metformin.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent
term restoration application for SYMLIN
(U.S. Patent No. 5,686,411) from Amylin
Pharmaceuticals, and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated February 24, 2006, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this human drug product had
undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of SYMLIN
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent
and Trademark Office requested that
FDA determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
SYMLIN is 4,620 days. Of this time,
3,060 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 1,560 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: July 24, 1992.
The applicant claims July 29, 1992, as
the date the investigational new drug
application (IND) became effective.
However, FDA records indicate that the
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
34946
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 116 / Friday, June 16, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
IND effective date was July 24, 1992,
which was 30 days after FDA receipt of
the IND.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: December 8, 2000. The
applicant claims December 7, 2000, as
the date the new drug application
(NDA) for Symlin (NDA 21–332) was
initially submitted. However, FDA
records indicate that NDA 21–332 was
submitted on December 8, 2000.
3. The date the application was
approved: March 16, 2005. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
21–332 was approved on March 16,
2005.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,586 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by August 15, 2006.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
December 13, 2006. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 17, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6–9414 Filed 6–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:25 Jun 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Response to Solicitation on Organ
Procurement and Transplantation
Network (OPTN) Living Donor
Guidelines
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), HHS.
ACTION: Response to solicitation of
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: A notice was published in the
Federal Register on January 23, 2006
(Vol. 71, No. 14, pages 3519–3520). The
purpose of this notice was to solicit
comments to assist HRSA in
determining whether criteria developed
by the Organ Procurement and
Transplantation Network (OPTN)
concerning organs procured from living
donors, including those concerning the
allocation of organs from living donors,
should be given the same status, and be
subject to the same enforcement actions,
as other OPTN policies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James F. Burdick, M.D., Director,
Division of Transplantation, Healthcare
Systems Bureau, Health Resources and
Services Administration, Parklawn
Building, Room 12C–06, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857;
telephone (301) 443–7577; fax (301)
594–6095; or e-mail: jburdick@hrsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Congress
has provided specific authority under
sections 372 of the Public Health
Service (PHS) Act, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 274 for the creation of a national
OPTN, which is, among other things, to
facilitate a donor and recipient
matching system; establish membership
criteria and medical criteria for
allocating donated organs; and provide
opportunities to members of the public
to comment with respect to proposed
criteria.
The OPTN Final Rule (42 CFR part
121) governs the operations of the OPTN
and is intended to help achieve the most
equitable and medically effective use of
human organs that are donated in trust
for transplantation. Under the final rule,
the OPTN is to develop policies on a
variety of issues, including ‘‘[p]olicies
for the equitable allocation of cadaveric
organs [now referred to as deceased
donor organs].’’ 42 CFR 121.4(a)(1).
Under the final rule, allocation policies
developed by the OPTN under section
121.8 of the final rule will be considered
enforceable when and if the Secretary
approves the policies as such.
Enforceable OPTN policies are subject
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to the sanctions described in section
121.10(c)(1) of the final rule. Nonenforceable OPTN policies may still be
subject to lesser sanctions by the OPTN
(e.g., an OPTN member being designated
a Member Not in Good Standing).
Although the authorizing statute does
not distinguish between transplants
using organs from living donors and
those using organs from deceased
donors, the final rule does not include
a requirement that the OPTN develop
policies concerning the equitable
allocation of living donor organs. Until
recently, OPTN policies have
predominantly focused on issues related
to organ donation and transplantation of
deceased donor organs.
However, several widely publicized
living donor deaths have caused the
OPTN to implement new practices of
reviewing and approving, on an
advisory basis, the qualifications of
living donor transplant programs.
Additionally, the increased incidence of
altruistic living donations has prompted
the OPTN to consider policies that are
patient-focused yet address the unique
circumstances pertaining to the recovery
and transplantation of living donor
organs. Section 121.4(a)(6) of the final
rule provides that the OPTN shall be
responsible for developing policies on a
variety of topics, including ‘‘[p]olicies
on such matters as the Secretary
directs.’’ In accordance with that
authority, the Healthcare Systems
Bureau directed the OPTN to develop
allocation guidelines for organs from
living donors and other policies
necessary and appropriate to promote
the safety and efficacy of living donor
transplantation for the donor and
recipient. It further advised the OPTN
that all living donation policies (other
than data reporting policies) should be
considered as best practices or
voluntary guidelines and not subject to
regular OPTN sanctions (even those
available with respect to violation of
non-enforceable policies) until the
public has had an opportunity to
comment on the matter.
In the January 23, 2006, Federal
Register notice, comments were
requested to assist HRSA in determining
whether OPTN living donor guidelines
should be given the same status of other
OPTN policies, i.e., be treated as
policies developed in accordance with
42 CFR 121.8, and be subject to the
same enforcement actions. The
Secretary explained that if he decided
these questions in the affirmative, OPTN
policies relating to living donors would
be treated the same as other OPTN
policies developed in accordance with
section 121.8 of the final rule. In other
words, OPTN policies concerning living
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 116 (Friday, June 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34945-34946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-9414]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2006E-0022]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; SYMLIN
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for SYMLIN and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD-007), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the human drug product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the
initial submission of an application to market the human drug product
and continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted, as well as any time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory
review period for a human drug product will include all of the testing
phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product SYMLIN
(pramlintide acetate). SYMLIN is given at mealtimes and is indicated
for Type 1 diabetes, as an adjunct treatment in patients who use
mealtime insulin therapy and who have failed to achieve desired glucose
control despite optimal insulin therapy, and for Type 2 diabetes, as an
adjunct treatment in patients who use mealtime insulin therapy and who
have failed to achieve desired glucose control despite optimal insulin
therapy, with or without a concurrent sulfonylurea agent and/or
metformin. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office
received a patent term restoration application for SYMLIN (U.S. Patent
No. 5,686,411) from Amylin Pharmaceuticals, and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this
patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated
February 24, 2006, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that
this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and
that the approval of SYMLIN represented the first permitted commercial
marketing or use of the product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
SYMLIN is 4,620 days. Of this time, 3,060 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 1,560 days
occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived
from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective:
July 24, 1992. The applicant claims July 29, 1992, as the date the
investigational new drug application (IND) became effective. However,
FDA records indicate that the
[[Page 34946]]
IND effective date was July 24, 1992, which was 30 days after FDA
receipt of the IND.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the act: December 8,
2000. The applicant claims December 7, 2000, as the date the new drug
application (NDA) for Symlin (NDA 21-332) was initially submitted.
However, FDA records indicate that NDA 21-332 was submitted on December
8, 2000.
3. The date the application was approved: March 16, 2005. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NDA 21-332 was approved on March
16, 2005.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,586 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by August 15, 2006. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by December 13,
2006. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in
21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 17, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6-9414 Filed 6-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S