Draft General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Flight 93 National Memorial, Pennsylvania, 34964-34965 [06-5485]

Download as PDF 34964 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 116 / Friday, June 16, 2006 / Notices Information will be available for pubic inspection online at https://parkplanning.nps.gov and at the following locations. Office of the Superintendent, Capitol Reef National Park, Park Headquarters, Jct. Hwy 24 & Scenic Drive, Torry, Utah 84775. Telephone: (435) 425–3791. Planning and Environmental Quality, Intermountain Support Office—Denver, National Park Service, 12795 W. Alameda Parkway, Lakewood, CO 80228. Telephone: (303) 969–2851. Office of Public Affairs, National Park Service, Department of Interior, 18th and C Streets NW., Washington, DC 20240. Telephone: (202) 208–6743. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Al Hendricks, Superintendent, Capitol Reef National Park, at the above address and telephone number. ADDRESSES: Dated: April 26, 2006. Rick M. Frost, Acting Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service. [FR Doc. 06–5484 Filed 6–15–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–DL–M DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Draft General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Flight 93 National Memorial, Pennsylvania National Park Service, Department of the Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91–190, as amended), the National Park Service announces the availability of the Draft General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (Draft GMP/EIS) for Flight 93 National Memorial, in Somerset County, Pennsylvania. Consistent with National Park Service laws, regulations, and policies, and the mission of Flight 93 National Memorial, the Draft GMP/EIS describes and analyzes two alternatives to guide the management of the national memorial over the next 15 to 20 years. The alternatives incorporate various management prescriptions to ensure protection and enjoyment of the park’s resources. Alternative 1 is a no action alternative. Alternative 2 is the National Park Service’s preferred alternative. Alternative 2 is based upon the selected design from the Flight 93 National Memorial International Design Competition. The Draft GMP/EIS evaluates potential environmental VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:25 Jun 15, 2006 Jkt 208001 consequences of implementing the alternatives. Impact topics include cultural and natural resources, transportation, and the socioeconomic environment. This notice also announces that a public meeting will be held to solicit comments on the Draft GMP/EIS during the public review period. The Draft GMP/EIS will be available for public review until August 15, 2006. Comments on the Draft GMP/ EIS must be received at one of the addresses below during the public review period. The National Park Service will hold a public meeting to solicit comments during the public review period. The public meeting will be held on Thursday, July 20, 2006, at the Shanksville-Stonycreek School in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, from 7 to 9 p.m. ADDRESSES: Comments on the Draft GMP/EIS may be submitted on the Internet at: https:// www.flight93memorialproject.org. Comments may also be mailed to: Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 W. Main Street, Suite 104, Somerset, PA 15501. It is the practice of the NPS to make all comments, including names and addresses of respondents who provide that information, available for public review following the conclusion of the NEPA process. Individuals may request that the NPS withhold their name and/ or address from public disclosure. If you wish to do this, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comments. NPS will honor such requests to the extent allowable by law, but you should be aware that NPS may still be required to disclose your name and address pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Draft GMP/EIS is available on the Internet at https:// www.flight93memorialproject.org. Copies are available upon request by writing to: Jeff Reinbold, Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 W. Main Street, Suite 104, Somerset, PA 15501. The Draft GMP/EIS is also at the Flight 93 National Memorial project office at the same address, during regular business hours. DATES: The Flight 93 National Memorial Act (Pub. L. 107– 226) was enacted on September 24, 2002. The Act authorized ‘‘a national memorial to commemorate the passengers and crew of Flight 93 who, on September 11, 2001, courageously gave their lives thereby thwarting a planned attack on our Nation’s Capital. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 * * *’’ This legislation created the Flight 93 National Memorial and specifically designated the crash site of Flight 93, located in Stonycreek Township, Somerset County, Pennsylvania, as the site to honor the passengers and crew of Flight 93. The Secretary of the Interior is authorized by the Act to administer the Memorial as a unit of the National Park System. The Act created the Flight 93 Advisory Commission and tasked it with: (1) Advising the Secretary on the boundary of the memorial site, (2) submitting to the Secretary a report containing recommendations for the planning, design, construction, and long-term management of a permanent memorial at the crash site by September 24, 2005; and (3) advising the Secretary in the development of a management plan for the site. The Commission recommended to the Secretary a boundary for the memorial on July 30, 2004 and the Secretary approved the recommendations on January 14, 2005. The boundary was published in the Federal Register in March 2005. The boundary includes 1,355 acres that comprise the crash site, the areas where human remains were found, the debris field, and lands necessary for viewing and accessing the national memorial. Approximately 907 additional acres comprise the perimeter viewshed and would ideally remain in private ownership and be protected through the acquisition of conservation or scenic easements by partners or other governmental agencies. The Partners agreed that an international competition was the most democratic, inclusive, and transparent way to generate designs for a permanent memorial. The competition began on September 11, 2004 and more than 1,000 design professionals and members of the public submitted design concepts. Five final designs were selected by a jury of professionals, family members and local leaders after extensive public comment and review. The five final designs were refined and after public review and comment, a second jury selected the design that best fulfilled the mission of the national memorial. The selected design was announced to the public on September 7, 2005 and is the basis of the preferred alternative in the Draft GMP/EIS. Alternative 2, the Preferred Design Alternative, would transform the reclaimed mining site where the plane crashed into a designed memorial landscape. The memorial landscape would enhance the natural topography of the site to focus attention on the crash site as the actual memorial. The agency would also develop a visitor center to E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1 34965 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 116 / Friday, June 16, 2006 / Notices explain the story of Flight 93 and the events of September 11, 2001. Site development would also include infrastructure, access roads, and visitor parking areas. The Environmental Impact Statement assesses the potential environmental impacts of implementing the alternatives. To support the plan, the National Park Service prepared a cultural landscape inventory and reports on transportation, geotechnical conditions, visitor and economic projections, natural resources, hazardous materials, and visual resources. The National Park Service conducted public scoping of the alternatives, including consultations with local, state, and federal agencies. After public review of the Draft GMP/ EIS, the National Park Service will consider comments, and a Final GMP/ EIS, followed by a Record of Decision, will be prepared. The Final GMP/EIS is scheduled for completion in 2006. Dated: May 11, 2006. Linda Canzanelli, Regional Director, Northeast Region, National Park Service. [FR Doc. 06–5485 Filed 6–15–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–25–M DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Reclamation Agency Information Collection Activities; New Information Collection; Comment Request Bureau of Reclamation, Interior. ACTION: Notice of a new information collection. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces the following Information Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval: Yakima Basin Recreation Survey, Washington. The ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its expected cost burden. DATES: Your written comments must be received on or before July 17, 2006. ADDRESSES: You may send comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other aspect of the information collection, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior at the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, via facsimile to (202) 395–6566 or e-mail to OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov. A copy of your comments should also be directed to the Bureau of Reclamation, Attention: 86–68580, PO Box 25007, Denver, CO 80225–0007. You may request copies of the proposed forms by writing to the above address or by contacting Darrell P. Welch at: (303) 445–2711. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact Darrell P. Welch at: (303) 445–2711. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: Yakima Basin Recreation Survey. Abstract: The Yakima River Basin is located in south central Washington State in the counties of Benton, Franklin, Yakima, and Kittitas. The seven major reservoirs in the Yakima River Basin are Bumping Lake, Clear Lake, Cle Elum, Kachess, Keechelus, Easton, and Rimrock. The five major rivers in the Yakima River Basin are the Yakima, Nachess, Cle Elum, Bumping and Tieton. Reclamation is in the process of preparing a Yakima River Basin Water Storage Feasibility Study and associated Environmental Impact Statement that will address options for supplying additional water storage for the Yakima River Basin. Currently, sitespecific recreation-related information is unavailable for the primary reservoirs and rivers. In order to accurately assess the current recreation and recreationrelated economic environment within the Yakima River Basin, additional information must be collected from the recreationists who visit the reservoirs and rivers within the basin. Further, the survey information will allow Reclamation to adequately assess the recreation impacts that different options may have on the environment and the local economy. The required 60-day comment period was initiated by a notice published in the Federal Register on February 16, 2006 (71 FR 8310). No comments were received in response to the 60-day comment period. Frequency: One time survey. Respondents: Yakima River Basin reservoir and river recreationists come from the cities of Yakima and Ellensburg, Washington, as well as the smaller communities within the basin. A large number of visitors also come from western Washington, in particular the Puget Sound communities of Seattle and Tacoma. A smaller portion of recreationists within the basin are outof-state visitors. Estimated Total Number of Respondents: 3,216. Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.0. Estimated Total Number of Annual Responses: 3,216. Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1,072 hours. Estimate of Burden for Each Form: Burden estimate per form (in minutes) Form Number of respondents Annual burden on respondents (in hours) 20 20 1,340 1,876 447 625 Total ...................................................................................................................................... wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES River Survey ................................................................................................................................ Reservoir Survey ......................................................................................................................... ........................ 3,216 1,072 Comments. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of our functions, including whether the information will have practical use; (b) The accuracy of our burden estimate for the proposed collection of VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:25 Jun 15, 2006 Jkt 208001 information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) Ways to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Reclamation will display a valid OMB control number on the forms. OMB has up to 60 days to approve or disapprove this information collection, but may respond after 30 days; therefore, public comment should be E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 116 (Friday, June 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34964-34965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Draft General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, 
Flight 93 National Memorial, Pennsylvania

AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91-190, as amended), the National Park 
Service announces the availability of the Draft General Management Plan 
and Environmental Impact Statement (Draft GMP/EIS) for Flight 93 
National Memorial, in Somerset County, Pennsylvania. Consistent with 
National Park Service laws, regulations, and policies, and the mission 
of Flight 93 National Memorial, the Draft GMP/EIS describes and 
analyzes two alternatives to guide the management of the national 
memorial over the next 15 to 20 years. The alternatives incorporate 
various management prescriptions to ensure protection and enjoyment of 
the park's resources. Alternative 1 is a no action alternative. 
Alternative 2 is the National Park Service's preferred alternative. 
Alternative 2 is based upon the selected design from the Flight 93 
National Memorial International Design Competition. The Draft GMP/EIS 
evaluates potential environmental consequences of implementing the 
alternatives. Impact topics include cultural and natural resources, 
transportation, and the socioeconomic environment. This notice also 
announces that a public meeting will be held to solicit comments on the 
Draft GMP/EIS during the public review period.

DATES: The Draft GMP/EIS will be available for public review until 
August 15, 2006. Comments on the Draft GMP/EIS must be received at one 
of the addresses below during the public review period. The National 
Park Service will hold a public meeting to solicit comments during the 
public review period. The public meeting will be held on Thursday, July 
20, 2006, at the Shanksville-Stonycreek School in Shanksville, 
Pennsylvania, from 7 to 9 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Comments on the Draft GMP/EIS may be submitted on the 
Internet at: https://www.flight93memorialproject.org. Comments may also 
be mailed to: Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 W. Main 
Street, Suite 104, Somerset, PA 15501. It is the practice of the NPS to 
make all comments, including names and addresses of respondents who 
provide that information, available for public review following the 
conclusion of the NEPA process. Individuals may request that the NPS 
withhold their name and/or address from public disclosure. If you wish 
to do this, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your 
comments. NPS will honor such requests to the extent allowable by law, 
but you should be aware that NPS may still be required to disclose your 
name and address pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Draft GMP/EIS is available on the 
Internet at https://www.flight93memorialproject.org. Copies are 
available upon request by writing to: Jeff Reinbold, Flight 93 National 
Memorial, 109 W. Main Street, Suite 104, Somerset, PA 15501. The Draft 
GMP/EIS is also at the Flight 93 National Memorial project office at 
the same address, during regular business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Flight 93 National Memorial Act (Pub. L. 
107-226) was enacted on September 24, 2002. The Act authorized ``a 
national memorial to commemorate the passengers and crew of Flight 93 
who, on September 11, 2001, courageously gave their lives thereby 
thwarting a planned attack on our Nation's Capital. * * *'' This 
legislation created the Flight 93 National Memorial and specifically 
designated the crash site of Flight 93, located in Stonycreek Township, 
Somerset County, Pennsylvania, as the site to honor the passengers and 
crew of Flight 93. The Secretary of the Interior is authorized by the 
Act to administer the Memorial as a unit of the National Park System.
    The Act created the Flight 93 Advisory Commission and tasked it 
with: (1) Advising the Secretary on the boundary of the memorial site, 
(2) submitting to the Secretary a report containing recommendations for 
the planning, design, construction, and long-term management of a 
permanent memorial at the crash site by September 24, 2005; and (3) 
advising the Secretary in the development of a management plan for the 
site.
    The Commission recommended to the Secretary a boundary for the 
memorial on July 30, 2004 and the Secretary approved the 
recommendations on January 14, 2005. The boundary was published in the 
Federal Register in March 2005. The boundary includes 1,355 acres that 
comprise the crash site, the areas where human remains were found, the 
debris field, and lands necessary for viewing and accessing the 
national memorial. Approximately 907 additional acres comprise the 
perimeter viewshed and would ideally remain in private ownership and be 
protected through the acquisition of conservation or scenic easements 
by partners or other governmental agencies.
    The Partners agreed that an international competition was the most 
democratic, inclusive, and transparent way to generate designs for a 
permanent memorial. The competition began on September 11, 2004 and 
more than 1,000 design professionals and members of the public 
submitted design concepts. Five final designs were selected by a jury 
of professionals, family members and local leaders after extensive 
public comment and review. The five final designs were refined and 
after public review and comment, a second jury selected the design that 
best fulfilled the mission of the national memorial. The selected 
design was announced to the public on September 7, 2005 and is the 
basis of the preferred alternative in the Draft GMP/EIS.
    Alternative 2, the Preferred Design Alternative, would transform 
the reclaimed mining site where the plane crashed into a designed 
memorial landscape. The memorial landscape would enhance the natural 
topography of the site to focus attention on the crash site as the 
actual memorial. The agency would also develop a visitor center to

[[Page 34965]]

explain the story of Flight 93 and the events of September 11, 2001. 
Site development would also include infrastructure, access roads, and 
visitor parking areas.
    The Environmental Impact Statement assesses the potential 
environmental impacts of implementing the alternatives. To support the 
plan, the National Park Service prepared a cultural landscape inventory 
and reports on transportation, geotechnical conditions, visitor and 
economic projections, natural resources, hazardous materials, and 
visual resources. The National Park Service conducted public scoping of 
the alternatives, including consultations with local, state, and 
federal agencies.
    After public review of the Draft GMP/EIS, the National Park Service 
will consider comments, and a Final GMP/EIS, followed by a Record of 
Decision, will be prepared. The Final GMP/EIS is scheduled for 
completion in 2006.

    Dated: May 11, 2006.
Linda Canzanelli,
Regional Director, Northeast Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 06-5485 Filed 6-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-25-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.