Draft General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Flight 93 National Memorial, Pennsylvania, 34964-34965 [06-5485]
Download as PDF
34964
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 116 / Friday, June 16, 2006 / Notices
Information will be
available for pubic inspection online at
https://parkplanning.nps.gov and at the
following locations.
Office of the Superintendent, Capitol
Reef National Park, Park Headquarters,
Jct. Hwy 24 & Scenic Drive, Torry, Utah
84775. Telephone: (435) 425–3791.
Planning and Environmental Quality,
Intermountain Support Office—Denver,
National Park Service, 12795 W.
Alameda Parkway, Lakewood, CO
80228. Telephone: (303) 969–2851.
Office of Public Affairs, National Park
Service, Department of Interior, 18th
and C Streets NW., Washington, DC
20240. Telephone: (202) 208–6743.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Al Hendricks, Superintendent,
Capitol Reef National Park, at the above
address and telephone number.
ADDRESSES:
Dated: April 26, 2006.
Rick M. Frost,
Acting Director, Intermountain Region,
National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 06–5484 Filed 6–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–DL–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Draft General Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement,
Flight 93 National Memorial,
Pennsylvania
National Park Service,
Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91–190, as
amended), the National Park Service
announces the availability of the Draft
General Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement (Draft
GMP/EIS) for Flight 93 National
Memorial, in Somerset County,
Pennsylvania. Consistent with National
Park Service laws, regulations, and
policies, and the mission of Flight 93
National Memorial, the Draft GMP/EIS
describes and analyzes two alternatives
to guide the management of the national
memorial over the next 15 to 20 years.
The alternatives incorporate various
management prescriptions to ensure
protection and enjoyment of the park’s
resources. Alternative 1 is a no action
alternative. Alternative 2 is the National
Park Service’s preferred alternative.
Alternative 2 is based upon the selected
design from the Flight 93 National
Memorial International Design
Competition. The Draft GMP/EIS
evaluates potential environmental
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:25 Jun 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
consequences of implementing the
alternatives. Impact topics include
cultural and natural resources,
transportation, and the socioeconomic
environment. This notice also
announces that a public meeting will be
held to solicit comments on the Draft
GMP/EIS during the public review
period.
The Draft GMP/EIS will be
available for public review until August
15, 2006. Comments on the Draft GMP/
EIS must be received at one of the
addresses below during the public
review period. The National Park
Service will hold a public meeting to
solicit comments during the public
review period. The public meeting will
be held on Thursday, July 20, 2006, at
the Shanksville-Stonycreek School in
Shanksville, Pennsylvania, from 7 to 9
p.m.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the Draft
GMP/EIS may be submitted on the
Internet at: https://
www.flight93memorialproject.org.
Comments may also be mailed to:
Superintendent, Flight 93 National
Memorial, 109 W. Main Street, Suite
104, Somerset, PA 15501. It is the
practice of the NPS to make all
comments, including names and
addresses of respondents who provide
that information, available for public
review following the conclusion of the
NEPA process. Individuals may request
that the NPS withhold their name and/
or address from public disclosure. If you
wish to do this, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comments. NPS will honor such
requests to the extent allowable by law,
but you should be aware that NPS may
still be required to disclose your name
and address pursuant to the Freedom of
Information Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Draft GMP/EIS is available on the
Internet at https://
www.flight93memorialproject.org.
Copies are available upon request by
writing to: Jeff Reinbold, Flight 93
National Memorial, 109 W. Main Street,
Suite 104, Somerset, PA 15501. The
Draft GMP/EIS is also at the Flight 93
National Memorial project office at the
same address, during regular business
hours.
DATES:
The Flight
93 National Memorial Act (Pub. L. 107–
226) was enacted on September 24,
2002. The Act authorized ‘‘a national
memorial to commemorate the
passengers and crew of Flight 93 who,
on September 11, 2001, courageously
gave their lives thereby thwarting a
planned attack on our Nation’s Capital.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
* * *’’ This legislation created the
Flight 93 National Memorial and
specifically designated the crash site of
Flight 93, located in Stonycreek
Township, Somerset County,
Pennsylvania, as the site to honor the
passengers and crew of Flight 93. The
Secretary of the Interior is authorized by
the Act to administer the Memorial as
a unit of the National Park System.
The Act created the Flight 93
Advisory Commission and tasked it
with: (1) Advising the Secretary on the
boundary of the memorial site, (2)
submitting to the Secretary a report
containing recommendations for the
planning, design, construction, and
long-term management of a permanent
memorial at the crash site by September
24, 2005; and (3) advising the Secretary
in the development of a management
plan for the site.
The Commission recommended to the
Secretary a boundary for the memorial
on July 30, 2004 and the Secretary
approved the recommendations on
January 14, 2005. The boundary was
published in the Federal Register in
March 2005. The boundary includes
1,355 acres that comprise the crash site,
the areas where human remains were
found, the debris field, and lands
necessary for viewing and accessing the
national memorial. Approximately 907
additional acres comprise the perimeter
viewshed and would ideally remain in
private ownership and be protected
through the acquisition of conservation
or scenic easements by partners or other
governmental agencies.
The Partners agreed that an
international competition was the most
democratic, inclusive, and transparent
way to generate designs for a permanent
memorial. The competition began on
September 11, 2004 and more than
1,000 design professionals and members
of the public submitted design concepts.
Five final designs were selected by a
jury of professionals, family members
and local leaders after extensive public
comment and review. The five final
designs were refined and after public
review and comment, a second jury
selected the design that best fulfilled the
mission of the national memorial. The
selected design was announced to the
public on September 7, 2005 and is the
basis of the preferred alternative in the
Draft GMP/EIS.
Alternative 2, the Preferred Design
Alternative, would transform the
reclaimed mining site where the plane
crashed into a designed memorial
landscape. The memorial landscape
would enhance the natural topography
of the site to focus attention on the crash
site as the actual memorial. The agency
would also develop a visitor center to
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
34965
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 116 / Friday, June 16, 2006 / Notices
explain the story of Flight 93 and the
events of September 11, 2001. Site
development would also include
infrastructure, access roads, and visitor
parking areas.
The Environmental Impact Statement
assesses the potential environmental
impacts of implementing the
alternatives. To support the plan, the
National Park Service prepared a
cultural landscape inventory and
reports on transportation, geotechnical
conditions, visitor and economic
projections, natural resources,
hazardous materials, and visual
resources. The National Park Service
conducted public scoping of the
alternatives, including consultations
with local, state, and federal agencies.
After public review of the Draft GMP/
EIS, the National Park Service will
consider comments, and a Final GMP/
EIS, followed by a Record of Decision,
will be prepared. The Final GMP/EIS is
scheduled for completion in 2006.
Dated: May 11, 2006.
Linda Canzanelli,
Regional Director, Northeast Region, National
Park Service.
[FR Doc. 06–5485 Filed 6–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–25–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Agency Information Collection
Activities; New Information Collection;
Comment Request
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of a new information
collection.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces the following Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been
forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval: Yakima Basin Recreation
Survey, Washington. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collection
and its expected cost burden.
DATES: Your written comments must be
received on or before July 17, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments
regarding the burden estimate, or any
other aspect of the information
collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to the Desk Officer
for the Department of the Interior at the
Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, via facsimile to (202) 395–6566
or e-mail to
OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov. A copy
of your comments should also be
directed to the Bureau of Reclamation,
Attention: 86–68580, PO Box 25007,
Denver, CO 80225–0007. You may
request copies of the proposed forms by
writing to the above address or by
contacting Darrell P. Welch at: (303)
445–2711.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information contact Darrell P.
Welch at: (303) 445–2711.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Yakima Basin Recreation
Survey.
Abstract: The Yakima River Basin is
located in south central Washington
State in the counties of Benton,
Franklin, Yakima, and Kittitas. The
seven major reservoirs in the Yakima
River Basin are Bumping Lake, Clear
Lake, Cle Elum, Kachess, Keechelus,
Easton, and Rimrock. The five major
rivers in the Yakima River Basin are the
Yakima, Nachess, Cle Elum, Bumping
and Tieton. Reclamation is in the
process of preparing a Yakima River
Basin Water Storage Feasibility Study
and associated Environmental Impact
Statement that will address options for
supplying additional water storage for
the Yakima River Basin. Currently, sitespecific recreation-related information
is unavailable for the primary reservoirs
and rivers. In order to accurately assess
the current recreation and recreationrelated economic environment within
the Yakima River Basin, additional
information must be collected from the
recreationists who visit the reservoirs
and rivers within the basin. Further, the
survey information will allow
Reclamation to adequately assess the
recreation impacts that different options
may have on the environment and the
local economy.
The required 60-day comment period
was initiated by a notice published in
the Federal Register on February 16,
2006 (71 FR 8310). No comments were
received in response to the 60-day
comment period.
Frequency: One time survey.
Respondents: Yakima River Basin
reservoir and river recreationists come
from the cities of Yakima and
Ellensburg, Washington, as well as the
smaller communities within the basin.
A large number of visitors also come
from western Washington, in particular
the Puget Sound communities of Seattle
and Tacoma. A smaller portion of
recreationists within the basin are outof-state visitors.
Estimated Total Number of
Respondents: 3,216.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.0.
Estimated Total Number of Annual
Responses: 3,216.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 1,072 hours.
Estimate of Burden for Each Form:
Burden
estimate per
form
(in minutes)
Form
Number of
respondents
Annual burden
on
respondents
(in hours)
20
20
1,340
1,876
447
625
Total ......................................................................................................................................
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
River Survey ................................................................................................................................
Reservoir Survey .........................................................................................................................
........................
3,216
1,072
Comments.
Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of our functions, including
whether the information will have
practical use;
(b) The accuracy of our burden
estimate for the proposed collection of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:25 Jun 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. Reclamation will
display a valid OMB control number on
the forms.
OMB has up to 60 days to approve or
disapprove this information collection,
but may respond after 30 days;
therefore, public comment should be
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 116 (Friday, June 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34964-34965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5485]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Draft General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement,
Flight 93 National Memorial, Pennsylvania
AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91-190, as amended), the National Park
Service announces the availability of the Draft General Management Plan
and Environmental Impact Statement (Draft GMP/EIS) for Flight 93
National Memorial, in Somerset County, Pennsylvania. Consistent with
National Park Service laws, regulations, and policies, and the mission
of Flight 93 National Memorial, the Draft GMP/EIS describes and
analyzes two alternatives to guide the management of the national
memorial over the next 15 to 20 years. The alternatives incorporate
various management prescriptions to ensure protection and enjoyment of
the park's resources. Alternative 1 is a no action alternative.
Alternative 2 is the National Park Service's preferred alternative.
Alternative 2 is based upon the selected design from the Flight 93
National Memorial International Design Competition. The Draft GMP/EIS
evaluates potential environmental consequences of implementing the
alternatives. Impact topics include cultural and natural resources,
transportation, and the socioeconomic environment. This notice also
announces that a public meeting will be held to solicit comments on the
Draft GMP/EIS during the public review period.
DATES: The Draft GMP/EIS will be available for public review until
August 15, 2006. Comments on the Draft GMP/EIS must be received at one
of the addresses below during the public review period. The National
Park Service will hold a public meeting to solicit comments during the
public review period. The public meeting will be held on Thursday, July
20, 2006, at the Shanksville-Stonycreek School in Shanksville,
Pennsylvania, from 7 to 9 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the Draft GMP/EIS may be submitted on the
Internet at: https://www.flight93memorialproject.org. Comments may also
be mailed to: Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 W. Main
Street, Suite 104, Somerset, PA 15501. It is the practice of the NPS to
make all comments, including names and addresses of respondents who
provide that information, available for public review following the
conclusion of the NEPA process. Individuals may request that the NPS
withhold their name and/or address from public disclosure. If you wish
to do this, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your
comments. NPS will honor such requests to the extent allowable by law,
but you should be aware that NPS may still be required to disclose your
name and address pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Draft GMP/EIS is available on the
Internet at https://www.flight93memorialproject.org. Copies are
available upon request by writing to: Jeff Reinbold, Flight 93 National
Memorial, 109 W. Main Street, Suite 104, Somerset, PA 15501. The Draft
GMP/EIS is also at the Flight 93 National Memorial project office at
the same address, during regular business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Flight 93 National Memorial Act (Pub. L.
107-226) was enacted on September 24, 2002. The Act authorized ``a
national memorial to commemorate the passengers and crew of Flight 93
who, on September 11, 2001, courageously gave their lives thereby
thwarting a planned attack on our Nation's Capital. * * *'' This
legislation created the Flight 93 National Memorial and specifically
designated the crash site of Flight 93, located in Stonycreek Township,
Somerset County, Pennsylvania, as the site to honor the passengers and
crew of Flight 93. The Secretary of the Interior is authorized by the
Act to administer the Memorial as a unit of the National Park System.
The Act created the Flight 93 Advisory Commission and tasked it
with: (1) Advising the Secretary on the boundary of the memorial site,
(2) submitting to the Secretary a report containing recommendations for
the planning, design, construction, and long-term management of a
permanent memorial at the crash site by September 24, 2005; and (3)
advising the Secretary in the development of a management plan for the
site.
The Commission recommended to the Secretary a boundary for the
memorial on July 30, 2004 and the Secretary approved the
recommendations on January 14, 2005. The boundary was published in the
Federal Register in March 2005. The boundary includes 1,355 acres that
comprise the crash site, the areas where human remains were found, the
debris field, and lands necessary for viewing and accessing the
national memorial. Approximately 907 additional acres comprise the
perimeter viewshed and would ideally remain in private ownership and be
protected through the acquisition of conservation or scenic easements
by partners or other governmental agencies.
The Partners agreed that an international competition was the most
democratic, inclusive, and transparent way to generate designs for a
permanent memorial. The competition began on September 11, 2004 and
more than 1,000 design professionals and members of the public
submitted design concepts. Five final designs were selected by a jury
of professionals, family members and local leaders after extensive
public comment and review. The five final designs were refined and
after public review and comment, a second jury selected the design that
best fulfilled the mission of the national memorial. The selected
design was announced to the public on September 7, 2005 and is the
basis of the preferred alternative in the Draft GMP/EIS.
Alternative 2, the Preferred Design Alternative, would transform
the reclaimed mining site where the plane crashed into a designed
memorial landscape. The memorial landscape would enhance the natural
topography of the site to focus attention on the crash site as the
actual memorial. The agency would also develop a visitor center to
[[Page 34965]]
explain the story of Flight 93 and the events of September 11, 2001.
Site development would also include infrastructure, access roads, and
visitor parking areas.
The Environmental Impact Statement assesses the potential
environmental impacts of implementing the alternatives. To support the
plan, the National Park Service prepared a cultural landscape inventory
and reports on transportation, geotechnical conditions, visitor and
economic projections, natural resources, hazardous materials, and
visual resources. The National Park Service conducted public scoping of
the alternatives, including consultations with local, state, and
federal agencies.
After public review of the Draft GMP/EIS, the National Park Service
will consider comments, and a Final GMP/EIS, followed by a Record of
Decision, will be prepared. The Final GMP/EIS is scheduled for
completion in 2006.
Dated: May 11, 2006.
Linda Canzanelli,
Regional Director, Northeast Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 06-5485 Filed 6-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-25-M