Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. and Rockstar Games, Inc.; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment, 34620-34621 [E6-9359]
Download as PDF
34620
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Notices
Alan White, Supervising Attorney,
Community Legal Services, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
Marva E. Williams, Senior Vice President,
Woodstock Institute, Chicago, Illinois
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, June 12, 2006.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E6–9336 Filed 6–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 052 3158]
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
and Rockstar Games, Inc.; Analysis of
Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public
Comment
Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed consent agreement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this
matter settles alleged violations of
Federal law prohibiting unfair or
deceptive acts or practices or unfair
methods of competition. The attached
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes both the allegations in the
draft complaint and the terms of the
consent order—embodied in the consent
agreement—that would settle these
allegations.
Comments must be received on
or before July 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments.
Comments should refer to ‘‘Take-Two
Interactive Software, Inc., et al., File No.
052 3158,’’ to facilitate the organization
of comments. A comment filed in paper
form should include this reference both
in the text and on the envelope, and
should be mailed or delivered to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission/Office of the Secretary,
Room 135–H (Annex N), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580. Comments
containing confidential material must be
filed in paper form, must be clearly
labeled ‘‘Confidential,’’ and must
comply with Commission Rule 4.9(c).
16 CFR 4.9(c) (2005).1 The FTC is
requesting that any comment filed in
paper form be sent by courier or
overnight service, if possible, because
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
DATES:
1 The comment must be accompanied by an
explicit request for confidential treatment,
including the factual and legal basis for the request,
and must identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public record.
The request will be granted or denied by the
Commission’s General Counsel, consistent with
applicable law and the public interest. See
Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:47 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
U.S. postal mail in the Washington area
and at the Commission is subject to
delay due to heightened security
precautions. Comments that do not
contain any nonpublic information may
instead be filed in electronic form as
part of or as an attachment to email
messages directed to the following email box: https://
secure.commentworks.com/ftc-taketwo/.
The FTC Act and other laws the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. All timely and responsive
public comments, whether filed in
paper or electronic form, will be
considered by the Commission, and will
be available to the public on the FTC
Web site, to the extent practicable, at
https://www.ftc.gov. As a matter of
discretion, the FTC makes every effort to
remove home contact information for
individuals from the public comments it
receives before placing those comments
on the FTC Web site. More information,
including routine uses permitted by the
Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC’s
privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/
ftc/privacy.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard F. Kelly (202/326–3304) or
Keith R. Fentonmiller (202/326–2775),
Bureau of Consumer Protection, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580.
Pursuant
to section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and § 2.34 of the Commission
Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is
hereby given that the above-captioned
consent agreement containing a consent
order to cease and desist, having been
filed with and accepted, subject to final
approval, by the Commission, has been
placed on the public record for a period
of thirty (30) days. The following
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes the terms of the consent
agreement, and the allegations in the
complaint. An electronic copy of the
full text of the consent agreement
package can be obtained from the FTC
Home Page (for June 8, 2006), on the
World Wide Web, at https://www.ftc.gov/
os/2006/0/index.htm. A paper copy can
be obtained from the FTC Public
Reference Room, Room 130–H, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580, either in person
or by calling (202) 326–2222.
Public comments are invited, and may
be filed with the Commission in either
paper or electronic form. All comments
should be filed as prescribed in the
ADDRESSES section above, and must be
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
received on or before the date specified
in the DATES section.
Analysis of Agreement Containing
Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission has
accepted, subject to final approval, an
agreement containing a consent order
from Take-Two Interactive Software,
Inc. and Rockstar Games, Inc. (‘‘the
companies’’). The proposed consent
order has been placed on the public
record for thirty (30) days for receipt of
comments by interested persons.
Comments received during this period
will become part of the public record.
After thirty (30) days, the Commission
will again review the agreement and the
comments received, and will decide
whether it should withdraw from the
agreement or make final the agreement’s
proposed order.
This matter involves alleged
deceptive representations in advertising
and on product packaging concerning
the content in the video game Grand
Theft Auto: San Andreas (‘‘San
Andreas’’). In September 2004, the
companies submitted materials to the
Entertainment Software Rating Board
(‘‘ESRB’’) for the purpose of obtaining a
rating for the PlayStation 2 version of
San Andreas. The companies did not
inform the ESRB about the existence of
an interactive sex mini-game that was
embedded in the game’s computer code,
but was inaccessible during normal
game play. Nor did the companies tell
the ESRB that the game disc contained
data files (unused in game play) for
female skins, which, if accessed, render
the female characters partially or
completely nude. However, the ESRB’s
published requirements in effect at that
time did not state that game companies
were required to disclose unused skins
in the game software or content in the
game code that was inaccessible and
unplayable without modifying the code.
Based on the companies’ submission,
the ESRB assigned San Andreas a M
(Mature 17+) rating and content
descriptors for Blood and Gore, Intense
Violence, Strong Language, Strong
Sexual Content, and Use of Drugs. The
companies released the Playstation 2
version of San Andreas in October 2004.
On June 7, 2005, the companies
released versions of San Andreas
playable on PCs and the Xbox console.
The PC and Xbox game discs also
contained the same code for the sex
mini-game and the nude skins. As with
the PlayStation 2 version, the
companies did not disclose the
existence of the disabled sex mini-game
or the nude skins on the PC and Xbox
game discs. The ESRB rated the PC and
Xbox versions of the game M (Mature
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
15JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Notices
17+) and assigned the same content
descriptors previously assigned to the
PlayStation 2 version.
The ESRB rating information
appeared in print, television, and
retailer advertisements for Grand Theft
Auto: San Andreas, and on game
packaging, for all three versions of the
game. Among other things, the
companies made the following claims
about the game: ‘‘MATURE 17+ * * *
M * * *’’ and ‘‘CONTENT RATED BY
ESRB.’’ None of the advertising
mentioned that the game contained
nudity.
On June 9, 2005—two days after the
release of the PC version of the game—
game enthusiasts posted a program on
the Internet, which, when downloaded
and installed on a user’s PC, enables the
sex mini-game code. This program was
dubbed ‘‘Hot Coffee.’’ A subsequent
version of the program imported nude
skins resident on the game disc onto
several of the female characters.
PlayStation 2 and Xbox players
eventually were able to access the minigame by physically modifying or adding
a hardware accessory to their game
console, installing special software, and
inputting cheat codes developed by
third parties.
On July 20, 2005, the ESRB revoked
the existing rating for the game as a
result of, among other things, viewing
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas as
modified by the Hot Coffee program and
the widespread availability of that
program. The companies entered into an
agreement with the ESRB that provided
that they would not contest a change in
rating for the game from M (Mature 17+)
to AO (Adults Only 18+) with an
additional content descriptor for nudity.
The companies also agreed to re-label or
recall all existing inventory, and to
make available to consumers a
downloadable patch rendering the Hot
Coffee content inoperable. In response,
most retailers decided not to sell the relabeled AO version of the game. In
September 2005, the companies released
a second M-rated version of San
Andreas without the Hot Coffee content.
According to the FTC complaint, the
companies represented, expressly or by
implication, that the ESRB had rated the
content of the original versions of Grand
Theft Auto: San Andreas M (Mature
17+) and that the ESRB had assigned the
following content descriptors as part of
the ESRB rating: Blood and Gore,
Intense Violence, Strong Language,
Strong Sexual Content, and Use of
Drugs. The complaint alleges that the
companies did not disclose to
consumers that the game discs
contained unused, but potentially
viewable, nude female skins and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:47 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
disabled, but potentially playable,
software code for a sexually explicit
mini-game that the ESRB had not rated.
The presence on the game discs of this
unrated content that might change, and,
in fact, did change, the rating of the
game to AO (Adults Only 18+) with an
additional content descriptor for nudity,
would have been material to many
consumers, particularly parents, in their
purchase, rental, or use of the product.
The complaint alleges that the
companies’ failure to disclose these
facts, in light of the representation
made, was and is a deceptive practice.
The proposed consent order contains
provisions designed to prevent the
companies from engaging in similar acts
and practices in the future. Part I of the
consent order requires the companies,
in connection with the advertising, sale,
or distribution of any electronic game,
to disclose, clearly and prominently, on
product packaging and in any
promotion or advertisement for an
electronic game, content relevant to the
rating, unless that content has been
disclosed sufficiently in prior
submissions to the rating authority. Part
I also prohibits the companies from
misrepresenting the rating or content
descriptors for an electronic game, and
requires the companies to establish and
implement, and thereafter maintain, a
comprehensive system reasonably
designed to ensure that all content in an
electronic game is considered and
reviewed by the companies in preparing
submissions to a rating authority.
Finally, Part I of the order states that
nothing in the order shall constitute a
waiver of the companies’ right to assert
that any of their conduct is or was
protected by the First Amendment to
the United States Constitution or any
analogous provision of a State
constitution, except that the companies
nonetheless acknowledge their
obligations to comply with the order.
Parts II through V of the consent order
require the companies to keep copies of
relevant advertisements and
promotional materials, to provide copies
of the order to certain of their personnel,
to notify the Commission of changes in
corporate structure, and to file
compliance reports with the
Commission. Part VI provides that the
order will terminate after twenty (20)
years under certain circumstances.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
proposed order, and it is not intended
to constitute an official interpretation of
the agreement and proposed order or to
modify in any way their terms.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34621
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–9359 Filed 6–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–06–0601]
Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, call 404–639–5960 and
send comments to Seleda Perryman,
CDC Assistant Reports Clearance
Officer, 1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74,
Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an e-mail to
omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
The National Tobacco Control
Program (NTCP) Chronicle Progress
Reporting System—Revision—(OMB
No. 0920–0601) National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
Tobacco use is the single most
preventable cause of death and disease
in the United States and most people
begin using tobacco in early
adolescence. Annually, tobacco use
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
15JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 115 (Thursday, June 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34620-34621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-9359]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 052 3158]
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. and Rockstar Games, Inc.;
Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed consent agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged
violations of Federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or
practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to
Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft
complaint and the terms of the consent order--embodied in the consent
agreement--that would settle these allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments.
Comments should refer to ``Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., et al.,
File No. 052 3158,'' to facilitate the organization of comments. A
comment filed in paper form should include this reference both in the
text and on the envelope, and should be mailed or delivered to the
following address: Federal Trade Commission/Office of the Secretary,
Room 135-H (Annex N), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20580. Comments containing confidential material must be filed in paper
form, must be clearly labeled ``Confidential,'' and must comply with
Commission Rule 4.9(c). 16 CFR 4.9(c) (2005).\1\ The FTC is requesting
that any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or overnight
service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area
and at the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security
precautions. Comments that do not contain any nonpublic information may
instead be filed in electronic form as part of or as an attachment to
email messages directed to the following e-mail box: https://
secure.commentworks.com/ftc-taketwo/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The comment must be accompanied by an explicit request for
confidential treatment, including the factual and legal basis for
the request, and must identify the specific portions of the comment
to be withheld from the public record. The request will be granted
or denied by the Commission's General Counsel, consistent with
applicable law and the public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c),
16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. All timely and responsive public comments, whether filed
in paper or electronic form, will be considered by the Commission, and
will be available to the public on the FTC Web site, to the extent
practicable, at https://www.ftc.gov. As a matter of discretion, the FTC
makes every effort to remove home contact information for individuals
from the public comments it receives before placing those comments on
the FTC Web site. More information, including routine uses permitted by
the Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's privacy policy, at https://
www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard F. Kelly (202/326-3304) or
Keith R. Fentonmiller (202/326-2775), Bureau of Consumer Protection,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 6(f) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and Sec. 2.34 of
the Commission Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is hereby given
that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order
to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to
final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record
for a period of thirty (30) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public
Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the
allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of
the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page
(for June 8, 2006), on the World Wide Web, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/
2006/0/index.htm. A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public
Reference Room, Room 130-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-2222.
Public comments are invited, and may be filed with the Commission
in either paper or electronic form. All comments should be filed as
prescribed in the ADDRESSES section above, and must be received on or
before the date specified in the DATES section.
Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission has accepted, subject to final
approval, an agreement containing a consent order from Take-Two
Interactive Software, Inc. and Rockstar Games, Inc. (``the
companies''). The proposed consent order has been placed on the public
record for thirty (30) days for receipt of comments by interested
persons. Comments received during this period will become part of the
public record. After thirty (30) days, the Commission will again review
the agreement and the comments received, and will decide whether it
should withdraw from the agreement or make final the agreement's
proposed order.
This matter involves alleged deceptive representations in
advertising and on product packaging concerning the content in the
video game Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas (``San Andreas''). In
September 2004, the companies submitted materials to the Entertainment
Software Rating Board (``ESRB'') for the purpose of obtaining a rating
for the PlayStation 2 version of San Andreas. The companies did not
inform the ESRB about the existence of an interactive sex mini-game
that was embedded in the game's computer code, but was inaccessible
during normal game play. Nor did the companies tell the ESRB that the
game disc contained data files (unused in game play) for female skins,
which, if accessed, render the female characters partially or
completely nude. However, the ESRB's published requirements in effect
at that time did not state that game companies were required to
disclose unused skins in the game software or content in the game code
that was inaccessible and unplayable without modifying the code. Based
on the companies' submission, the ESRB assigned San Andreas a M (Mature
17+) rating and content descriptors for Blood and Gore, Intense
Violence, Strong Language, Strong Sexual Content, and Use of Drugs. The
companies released the Playstation 2 version of San Andreas in October
2004.
On June 7, 2005, the companies released versions of San Andreas
playable on PCs and the Xbox console. The PC and Xbox game discs also
contained the same code for the sex mini-game and the nude skins. As
with the PlayStation 2 version, the companies did not disclose the
existence of the disabled sex mini-game or the nude skins on the PC and
Xbox game discs. The ESRB rated the PC and Xbox versions of the game M
(Mature
[[Page 34621]]
17+) and assigned the same content descriptors previously assigned to
the PlayStation 2 version.
The ESRB rating information appeared in print, television, and
retailer advertisements for Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, and on game
packaging, for all three versions of the game. Among other things, the
companies made the following claims about the game: ``MATURE 17+ * * *
M * * *'' and ``CONTENT RATED BY ESRB.'' None of the advertising
mentioned that the game contained nudity.
On June 9, 2005--two days after the release of the PC version of
the game--game enthusiasts posted a program on the Internet, which,
when downloaded and installed on a user's PC, enables the sex mini-game
code. This program was dubbed ``Hot Coffee.'' A subsequent version of
the program imported nude skins resident on the game disc onto several
of the female characters. PlayStation 2 and Xbox players eventually
were able to access the mini-game by physically modifying or adding a
hardware accessory to their game console, installing special software,
and inputting cheat codes developed by third parties.
On July 20, 2005, the ESRB revoked the existing rating for the game
as a result of, among other things, viewing Grand Theft Auto: San
Andreas as modified by the Hot Coffee program and the widespread
availability of that program. The companies entered into an agreement
with the ESRB that provided that they would not contest a change in
rating for the game from M (Mature 17+) to AO (Adults Only 18+) with an
additional content descriptor for nudity. The companies also agreed to
re-label or recall all existing inventory, and to make available to
consumers a downloadable patch rendering the Hot Coffee content
inoperable. In response, most retailers decided not to sell the re-
labeled AO version of the game. In September 2005, the companies
released a second M-rated version of San Andreas without the Hot Coffee
content.
According to the FTC complaint, the companies represented,
expressly or by implication, that the ESRB had rated the content of the
original versions of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas M (Mature 17+) and
that the ESRB had assigned the following content descriptors as part of
the ESRB rating: Blood and Gore, Intense Violence, Strong Language,
Strong Sexual Content, and Use of Drugs. The complaint alleges that the
companies did not disclose to consumers that the game discs contained
unused, but potentially viewable, nude female skins and disabled, but
potentially playable, software code for a sexually explicit mini-game
that the ESRB had not rated. The presence on the game discs of this
unrated content that might change, and, in fact, did change, the rating
of the game to AO (Adults Only 18+) with an additional content
descriptor for nudity, would have been material to many consumers,
particularly parents, in their purchase, rental, or use of the product.
The complaint alleges that the companies' failure to disclose these
facts, in light of the representation made, was and is a deceptive
practice.
The proposed consent order contains provisions designed to prevent
the companies from engaging in similar acts and practices in the
future. Part I of the consent order requires the companies, in
connection with the advertising, sale, or distribution of any
electronic game, to disclose, clearly and prominently, on product
packaging and in any promotion or advertisement for an electronic game,
content relevant to the rating, unless that content has been disclosed
sufficiently in prior submissions to the rating authority. Part I also
prohibits the companies from misrepresenting the rating or content
descriptors for an electronic game, and requires the companies to
establish and implement, and thereafter maintain, a comprehensive
system reasonably designed to ensure that all content in an electronic
game is considered and reviewed by the companies in preparing
submissions to a rating authority. Finally, Part I of the order states
that nothing in the order shall constitute a waiver of the companies'
right to assert that any of their conduct is or was protected by the
First Amendment to the United States Constitution or any analogous
provision of a State constitution, except that the companies
nonetheless acknowledge their obligations to comply with the order.
Parts II through V of the consent order require the companies to
keep copies of relevant advertisements and promotional materials, to
provide copies of the order to certain of their personnel, to notify
the Commission of changes in corporate structure, and to file
compliance reports with the Commission. Part VI provides that the order
will terminate after twenty (20) years under certain circumstances.
The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the
proposed order, and it is not intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the agreement and proposed order or to modify in any
way their terms.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-9359 Filed 6-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P