Mississippi Institute for Improvement of Geographic Minority Health and Health Disparities Program, 34362-34369 [E6-9315]
Download as PDF
34362
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2006 / Notices
f. How should an EBT system for the
delivery of multiple program benefits
and services be developed and
financed?
i. What resources—financial and
infrastructure related—would be
required? What would be the most
expensive elements of such an EBT
system?
ii. What would be the estimated cost
of developing and implementing an EBT
system for cross-cutting human services
programs?
iii. How should such a service
delivery system be sustained in future
years in terms of cost sharing?
g. What should be available, that is
currently not available, to provide an
efficient delivery system?
h. What ownership issues, if any,
arise from the model system you
propose? How should these be resolved?
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
3. Design Requirements
a. What technical standards should be
used? What are appropriate technical
performance standards? What industry
standards are currently in place?
b. What transaction interfaces should
be assumed?
c. What platforms now exist? How
could these existing platforms be made
compatible with existing point of
service systems?
d. How could this benefit system be
created from existing benefit structures,
e.g., an aggregation of existing Federal,
State, and locally-administered benefit
and services programs? What are the
advantages and disadvantages of such
an approach?
e. What is the potential for
interoperability with existing Federal,
State and local electronic benefit and
service delivery systems where these
exist?
f. What types of information are
relevant, necessary, or useful to
ensuring benefits are delivered quickly
to eligible victims?
g. What approaches would you
recommend for monitoring the
utilization of benefits by displaced
victims to ensure they continue to
receive benefits to which they are
entitled?
h. What back-up or contingency plans
can be implemented if there is no
electricity or if the system fails? What
contingency plans are in place with
existing systems?
i. Across multiple programs,
particular benefits and services may run
out (i.e. an individual’s eligibility for
particular benefits may be time limited).
How would this be handled?
j. What is the universe of benefits that
could be included in such a system?
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:47 Jun 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
4. Security and Enforcement
a. What administrative, technical, and
physical security approaches should
used?
b. What enforcement mechanisms
would be appropriate to ensure against
fraud?
c. How would an EBT operator ensure
that benefits and services were actually
provided to the right individuals
without incurring costly and labor
intensive verification procedures?
i. What safeguards could be
incorporated to prevent fraud?
ii. How could the delivery mechanism
be invalidated if stolen, lost, or
otherwise compromised?
iii. What measures could be put in
place to avoid duplicate participation or
overpayment?
d. How can HHS ensure that it does
not pay for services rendered to an
unauthorized person or for services that
are not authorized?
e. Who should be responsible for
enforcing the rules associated with use
of the EBT system?
f. What legal requirements for privacy
or confidentiality would apply to the
information to be collected for benefit
programs, and how should they be
addressed in the system?
g. What other privacy considerations
should be incorporated into system
design and implementation?
5. EBT Delivery Requirements
a. How can benefits be made available
to those they are intended to help as
quickly as they would be needed?
i. How could benefits be made
available that do not depend on whether
victims move to other states after being
displaced from their homes? If that is
not possible, how could displaced
victims access their benefits if they have
moved to other states?
ii. Who do the benefit programs, or
other law, authorize to act on behalf of
other individuals (beneficiaries), e.g.,
legal guardians, etc? Are there other
persons who should be so authorized?
How may such authority be established?
iii. Can organizations (e.g., HHS
grantee sites) receive EBT benefits on
behalf of eligible individuals?
b. What rights and responsibilities
should individuals have with respect to
getting and using benefits and services?
c. Are there legal impediments that a
provider of services must comply with
or overcome before implementing a
benefits delivery system?
d. What should be the role of the
Federal government in facilitating the
development of this system?
e. Can benefits be provided at HHS
grantee sites where individuals may
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
initially receive services? What would
be needed to equip HHS grantees with
such capabilities?
f. If devices that beneficiaries need to
carry (such as magnetic stripe cards or
smart cards) are used, what are the
options for the distribution of such EBT
tools?
g. What type of case management—
related to use of and problems with the
EBT system—would be needed for
individuals receiving benefits through
such a system? What consumer
education is needed for beneficiaries?
g. What rights and responsibilities
should be assigned to those responsible
for distributing and monitoring the use
of the benefits?
h. What kind of training and public
information program would be needed?
i. What technical support needs to be
provided?
j. What provisions should there be for
a help desk for providers and recipients
and the replacement of lost or stolen
cards/documentation or other help that
might be needed?
6. EBT Pilot Testing
a. Who should be responsible for
managing any pilot of the system?
b. Could an EBT system be installed
and tested in medical, financial, and
retail environments without disrupting
current systems and operations?
c. What requirements are appropriate
for a pilot program?
i. How long would it take to set up the
pilot; how long should it run?
ii. What should be the scale of such
a test?
iii What resources would be required?
How much would it cost?
iv. What technical support would be
required?
v. How should the pilot be evaluated?
Please feel free to add any other
comments, suggestions or creative ideas
to your response.
Issued on June 9, 2006.
Charles Havekost,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Information
Technology and Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–9314 Filed 6–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Mississippi Institute for Improvement
of Geographic Minority Health and
Health Disparities Program
Office of Minority Health,
Office of Public Health and Science,
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2006 / Notices
Announcement Type: Competitive
Initial Announcement of Availability of
Funds.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: Mississippi
Institute for Improvement of Geographic
Minority Health and Health Disparities
Program—93.137.
DATES: Application Availability Date:
June 14, 2006. Application Deadline:
July 14, 2006.
SUMMARY: This announcement is made
by the United States Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS or
Department), Office of Minority Health
(OMH) located within the Office of
Public Health and Science (OPHS), and
working in a ‘‘One-Department’’
approach collaboratively with
participating HHS agencies and
programs (entities). The mission of the
OMH is to improve the health of racial
and ethnic minority populations
through the development of policies and
programs that address disparities and
gaps. OMH serves as the focal point in
the HHS for leadership, policy
development and coordination, service
demonstrations, information exchange,
coalition and partnership building, and
related efforts to address the health
needs of racial and ethnic minorities.
This announcement supports the
Healthy People 2010 overarching goal to
eliminate health disparities.
As part of a continuing HHS effort to
improve the health and well being of
racial and ethnic minorities, the
Department announces availability of
FY 2006 funding for the Mississippi
Institute for Improvement of Geographic
Minority Health and Health Disparities
Program. Despite significant
improvements in the overall health
status of the nation over the past
decades, disparities in health status
continue to persist among racial and
ethnic minority and disadvantaged
populations. Such disparities are clearly
illustrated by health status statistics in
southern areas of the United States.
Mississippi serves as an important pilot
location for the development of a
geographic and minority health
disparities model for the nation.
Mississippi has a population of 2.8
million, 37 percent of whom are African
American, and 51percent of whom live
in rural areas. It is the fourth most rural
state in the nation, and is ranked 31st
in terms of population size. The
significant disease burden of the state is
well documented. It ranks first of all
states and the District of Columbia in
mortality rates due to cardiovascular
disease (30 percent higher than the
national average). In 1996, the
cardiovascular disease-related death rate
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:47 Jun 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
for African Americans in the state was
37 percent greater than for whites, and
60 percent greater than the overall
national rate. Stroke mortality, the third
leading cause of death in Mississippi, is
18 percent higher than the rate for the
U.S. as a whole. It has the highest
prevalence of diabetes and obesity in
the nation; approximately 9 percent of
the state’s adult population are diabetic
and 55 percent are obese. Mississippi
ranks 5th highest overall in cancer
mortality rates among the 50 states and
the District of Columbia. African
Americans make up more than 75
percent of the state’s reported new AIDS
cases. Premature death rates are almost
2 times greater for American Indians
and 1.5 times greater for African
Americans than whites. The infant
mortality rate in a number of counties
along the Mississippi Delta is three
times that of the national average.
Mississippi has many challenges
affecting access to medical care. Almost
one-quarter of the state’s population,
aged 18 to 64, report having no health
insurance; higher than the 15.7 percent
of people nationally without health
insurance in 2004, according to the U.S.
Census. Other reasons for insufficient
access include the state’s ratio of
medical doctors to its general
population, which is about half the
national average, and the large
percentage of rural, sparsely-populated
areas within the state. Access to health
care and delivery of services to a
sizeable population in Mississippi,
already inadequate, have been further
impacted by the devastation caused by
last year’s hurricanes. The Gulf Coast of
Mississippi suffered massive damage
from the impact of Hurricane Katrina on
August 29, 2005, leaving 236 people
dead, 67 missing, and an estimated $125
billion in damages. Mississippi’s
healthcare system has been seriously
disrupted, resulting in new health
problems for people living in affected
areas. The grant will provide an
opportunity to address these health
problems and to aid in restructuring the
healthcare system.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
1. Purpose
2. OMH Expectations
3. Applicant Project Results
4. Project Requirements
Section II. Award Information
Section III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
3. Other
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34363
Section IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address To Request Application Package
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
3. Submission Dates and Time
4. Intergovernmental Review
5. Funding Restrictions
Section V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
2. Review and Selection Process
3. Anticipated Award Date
Section VI. Award Administration
Information
1. Award Notices
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
3. Reporting Requirements
Section VII. Agency Contacts
Section VIII. Other Information
1. Healthy People 2010
2. Definitions
Section I. Funding Opportunity
Description
Authority: This program is authorized
under 42 U.S.C. 300u–6, section 1707 of the
Public Health Service Act, as amended.
1. Purpose
The Mississippi Institute for
Improvement of Geographic Minority
Health and Health Disparities Program
is designed to address the many and
significant health disparities faced by
rural disadvantaged and minority
populations throughout the state. This
program is intended to demonstrate the
effectiveness and efficiency of a targeted
and multifaceted statewide approach for
eliminating health disparities. The grant
requires a multi-partner effort, involving
institutions of higher education, state
and local health agencies, faith and
community-based organizations,
healthcare organizations, and other
stakeholders to tackle the state-wide
challenge.
2. OMH Expectations
It is expected that the model will fill
an existing void for addressing the
significant and increasing disparities
among the targeted populations and
communities in Mississippi that will
lead to:
Increased awareness by all
populations of healthcare issues
impacting rural disadvantaged and
minority communities;
Increased access to quality healthcare
for rural disadvantaged and minority
populations;
Increased number of healthcare
personnel available to provide services
to rural disadvantaged and minority
populations;
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
34364
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2006 / Notices
Improved health outcomes for rural
disadvantaged and minority
populations.
Over the long term, OMH intends to
use the model developed under this
project and variations of the model to
address national policies and programs
to improve the health of rural
disadvantaged and minority
communities.
3. Applicant Project Results
Applicants must identify anticipated
project results that are consistent with
the overall program purpose and OMH
expectations. Project results should fall
within the following general categories:
Mobilizing Communities and
Partnerships
Increasing Knowledge and Awareness
Changing Behavior and Utilization
Increasing Access to Health Care
Services
Policy Research
Changing Systems
Improving Data and Evaluation
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
4. Project Requirements
19:47 Jun 13, 2006
Section II. Award Information
Estimated Funds Available for
Competition: $5,000,000 in FY 2006.
Anticipated Number of Awards: 1.
Range of Awards: $5,000,000.
Anticipated Start Date: September 1,
2006.
Period of Performance: 3 Years
(September 1, 2006 to August 31, 2009).
Budget Period Length: 12 months.
Type of Award: Grant.
Type of Application Accepted: New.
Section III. Eligibility Information
Each applicant under the proposed
model program must propose to:
Establish the Mississippi Institute for
Improvement of Geographic Minority
Health and Health Disparities to serve as
a hub of state-wide activity, services and
information on health disparities and
the impact on Mississippi’s racial,
ethnic, and rural communities. Form
partnerships with health professions
schools, state and/or local health
agencies, healthcare organizations, faith
and community based organizations,
and other stakeholders to build the
research/science/knowledge base on
health disparities and evidence-based
practices; foster dialogue on public
policy, research and health system
issues; carry out community outreach
and other public education/awareness
activities; develop and disseminate
culturally appropriate educational
materials for healthcare providers and
consumers; promote training of a
culturally diverse healthcare workforce;
train providers to deliver appropriate
care to rural and minority communities;
and address the use of technology to
improve the quality of health systems
and delivery of care. Develop, establish,
and conduct programs, initiatives, and
activities through four core components
within the Institute: Research, Services,
Education/Awareness, and Health
Information.
Develop a cadre of researchers/
investigators from historically black
colleges and universities within the
state.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Establish an advisory board to provide
advice and guidance on program
implementation, design, and direction.
A signed Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) between the applicant
organization and each partner
organization must be submitted with the
application. Each MOA must clearly
detail the roles and resources (including
in-kind) that each entity will bring to
the project; state the duration and terms
of the agreement; cover the entire
project period; and be signed by an
individual with the authority to
represent the organization.
Jkt 208001
1. Eligible Applicants
To qualify for funding, an applicant
must be located in the State of
Mississippi and must be a:
(1) Health professions school or
academic health center; or
(2) Private nonprofit communitybased, minority-serving organization
which addresses health or human
services; or
(3) State or local government agency
which addresses health or human
services.
This competition is limited to the
State of Mississippi.
Other entities that meet the definition
of private non-profit community-based,
minority-serving organization and the
above criteria that are eligible to apply
are:
Faith-based organizations.
Tribal governments and organizations.
The organization submitting the
application will:
Serve as the lead agency for the
project, responsible for its
implementation and management; and
Serve as the fiscal agent for the
Federal grant awarded.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
Matching funds are not required for
the Institute Program.
3. Other
This competition is limited to the
State of Mississippi, based on its dire
health care needs as described in the
Summary. Additionally, due to last
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
year’s hurricanes, Mississippi’s
healthcare system has been seriously
disrupted, adding to the myriad of
health problems for people living in the
state. The grant will provide an
opportunity to address these health
problems and to aid in restructuring the
healthcare system.
If funding is requested in an amount
greater than the ceiling of the award
range, the application will be
considered non-responsive and will not
be entered into the review process. The
application will be returned with
notification that it did not meet the
submission requirements.
Applications that are not complete or
that do not conform to or address the
criteria of this announcement will be
considered non-responsive and will not
be entered into the review process. The
application will be returned with
notification that it did not meet the
submission requirements.
No more than one application per
organization may be submitted to the
Mississippi Institute for Improvement of
Geographic Minority Health and Health
Disparities Program. Those
organizations submitting more than one
proposal for this grant program will be
deemed ineligible, and the proposals
will be returned without comment.
Organizations are not eligible to
receive funding from more than one
OMH grant program to carry out the
same project and/or activities.
Section IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address To Request Application
Package
Application kits may be obtained: At
https://www.omhrc.gov. By writing to the
Office of Grants Management, OPHS,
Tower Building, 1101 Wootton
Parkway, Suite 550, Rockville, MD
20852; or contact the Office of Grants
Management at (240) 453–8822.
Application kits may also be requested
by fax at (240) 453–8823. Please specify
the program name, Mississippi Institute
for Improvement of Geographic
Minority Health and Health Disparities
Project, when requesting an application
kit.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
A. Application and Submission
Applicants must use Grant
Application Form OPHS–1 and
complete the Face Page/Cover Page (SF
424), Checklist, and Budget Information
Forms for Non-Construction Programs
(SF 424A). In addition, the application
must contain a project narrative. The
project narrative (including summary
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2006 / Notices
and appendices) is limited to 60 pages
double-spaced.
The narrative must be printed on one
side of 81⁄2 by 11 inch white paper, with
one inch margins, double-spaced and
12-point font. All pages must be
numbered sequentially including any
appendices. (Do not use decimals or
letters, such as: 1.3 or 2A.) Do not staple
or bind the application package.
The narrative description of the
project must contain the following, in
the order presented:
Table of Contents.
Project Summary: Describe key
aspects of the Background, Objectives,
Program Plan, and Evaluation Plan. The
summary is limited to 3 pages.
Background:
Statement of Need: Provide a clearly
stated description of the scope of the
problems to be addressed by the project,
and methods that will be implemented
to create an Institute focusing on
research, services, education/awareness,
and health information. Identify partner
organizations and provide the rationale
for including them in the project.
Organizational Capability: Discuss
the applicant organization’s experience
in managing project/activities,
especially those targeting the population
to be served, and the major
accomplishments achieved. Indicate
where the Institute will be located
within the organization’s structure, the
reporting channel and how this location
will allow the Institute to be successful
with an effort of this magnitude. Provide
a chart of the proposed project’s
organizational structure, showing who
will report to whom and how this
structure will facilitate efficient
communications and timely action on
key project activities. Describe how the
partner organizations will interface with
the applicant organization.
Objectives: State objectives in
measurable terms, with baseline data
and quantified expected outcome(s),
and realistic target date(s) for
achievement. Objectives must address
each of the four program components
(i.e., research, services, education/
awareness, and health information) as
spelled out under the Project
Requirements section.
Program Plan: Describe in detail the
specific project activities and strategies
to be implemented to achieve each
stated objective. The description should
encompass information about how,
when, where, for whom, and by whom
activities will take place. Include a
description of the active role of partner
organizations in the development and
implementation phases of the project.
Include projected numbers of
participants/beneficiaries for each
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:47 Jun 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
activity/service. Activities must be
conducted in the areas of research,
services, education/awareness, and
health information.
—Research. At a minimum, this activity
must include:
(1) Strategies for improving the
quantity and quality of data and
information on the health status of rural
and minority populations; identification
of key health factors impacting the
health of rural and minority
populations; and methods for tracking
changes in the health status of the
targeted populations.
(2) Preventive and clinical
interventions to improve the health
status of rural and minority populations.
(3) Research centered on delivery of
healthcare services and health policy.
—Services. At a minimum, this activity
must include:
(1) Strategies, methods, and/or
program models to increase the health
status of rural and minority populations
using community and evidence-based
service delivery models that integrate
and more efficiently manage existing
health care resources.
—Education/Awareness. At a minimum,
this activity must include:
(1) Strategies for improving
availability and accessibility of
information in a format and in venues
that reach individuals, health care
providers/practitioners, health care
organizations/associations, business
leaders and others.
(2) Community-based health
education and consumer education
models.
(3) Training of primary healthcare
providers from diverse backgrounds,
both geographic and racial/ethnic, to
better serve the target population and to
increase the number and availability of
healthcare providers serving these
populations.
(4) Training efforts designed to
expand the health education pipeline.
—Health Information. At a minimum,
this activity must include:
(1) An electronic medical records
system that would be accessible by both
providers and patients.
(2) An interconnected, state-wide
health data exchange network.
Discuss strategies and identify
funding sources for sustaining the
Institute and all of its activities after the
end of the Federally funded project
period. Provide a timetable and the level
of financial support needed to achieve
self-sufficiency.
Provide a description of the proposed
program staff, including resumes and
job descriptions for key staff,
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34365
qualifications and responsibilities of
each staff member, and percent of time
each will commit to the project. Provide
a description of duties for any proposed
consultants. Describe any products to be
developed by the project. Provide a
timeline for the project.
Evaluation Plan: The evaluation plan
must clearly articulate how program
activities will be evaluated. The
evaluation plan must be able to produce
documented results that demonstrate
whether and how the strategies and
activities funded under the Program
made a difference in eliminating racial/
ethnic and rural health disparities. The
plan should identify the expected
results (i.e., a particular impact,
outcome or product) for each objective
and major activity. The description
should include data collection and
analysis methods, demographic data to
be collected on project participants,
process measures describing indicators
to be used to monitor and measure
progress toward achieving projected
results by objective, outcome measures
to determine if the project has
accomplished planned activities, and
impact measures to demonstrate
achievement of the goal to positively
affect health disparities.
Discuss plans to document the steps
which others may follow to replicate the
proposed project in similar
communities. Describe a comprehensive
plan for diffusion of project results to
other communities. The plan must
include expectations for publishing
results in professional literature and to
communities in a manner and through
venues that they access.
In addition to the project narrative,
the application must contain a detailed
budget justification which includes a
narrative explanation and indicates the
computation of expenditures for each
year for which grant support is
requested. (The budget justification does
not count toward the page limitation.)
B. Data Universal Numbering System
number (DUNS)
Applications must have a Dun &
Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal
Numbering System number as the
universal identifier when applying for
Federal grants. The D&B number can be
obtained by calling (866) 705–5711 or
through the Web site at https://
www.dnb.com/us/.
3. Submission Dates and Times
Application Deadline Date: July 14,
2006.
Submission Mechanisms
The Office of Public Health and
Science provides multiple mechanisms
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
34366
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2006 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
for the submission of applications, as
described in the following sections.
Applicants will receive notification via
mail from the Office of Grants
Management, OPHS, confirming the
receipt of applications submitted using
any of these mechanisms. Applications
submitted after the deadline described
below will not be accepted for review.
Applications that do not conform to the
requirements of the grant announcement
will not be accepted for review and will
be returned to the applicant.
You may submit your application in
either electronic or paper format.
To submit an application
electronically, use either the OPHS
eGrants web site, https://
egrants.osophs.dhhs.gov or the
Grants.gov web site, https://
www.Grants.gov/. OMH will not accept
grant applications via any other means
of electronic communication, including
email or facsimile transmission.
Electronic Submission
If you choose to submit your
application electronically, please note
the following: Electronic submission is
voluntary, but strongly encouraged. You
will not receive additional point value
because you submit a grant application
in electronic format, nor will you be
penalized if you submit an application
in paper format. The electronic
application for this program may be
accessed on https://
egrants.osophs.dhhs.gov (eGrants) or on
https://www.grants.gov/ (Grants.gov). If
using Grants.gov, you must search for
the downloadable application package
by the CFDA number (93.910).
When you enter the eGrants or the
Grants.gov sites, you will find
information about submitting an
application electronically, as well as the
hours of operation. We strongly
recommend that you do not wait until
the deadline date to begin the
application process. Visit eGrants or
Grants.gov at least 30 days prior to filing
your application to fully understand the
process and requirements. Grants.gov
requires organizations to successfully
complete a registration process prior to
submission of an application. The body
of the application and required forms
can be submitted electronically using
either system. Electronic submissions
must contain all forms required by the
application kit, as well as the Program
Narrative, Budget Narrative, and any
appendices or exhibits. Applicants
using eGrants are also required to
submit, by mail, a hard copy of the face
page (SF424) with the original signature
of an individual authorized to act for the
applicant agency or organization and to
assume for the organization the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:47 Jun 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
obligations imposed by the terms and
conditions of the grant award.
(Applicants using Grants.gov are not
required to submit a hard copy of the
SF424, as Grants.gov uses digital
signature technology.) If required,
applicants using eGrants may also need
to submit a hard copy of SF LLL, and/
or certain program related forms (e.g.,
Program certifications) with original
signatures.
Any other hard copy materials, or
documents requiring signature, must
also be submitted via mail. Mail-in
items may only include publications,
resumes, or organizational
documentation. (If applying via eGrants,
the applicant must identify the mail-in
items on the Application Checklist at
the time of electronic submission.) The
application will not be considered
complete until both the electronic
application components and any hard
copy materials or original signatures are
received. All mailed items must be
received by the Office of Grants
Management, OPHS by the deadline
specified below.
Your application must comply with
any page limitation requirements
described in this program
announcement.
We strongly encourage you to submit
your electronic application well before
the closing date and time so that if
difficulties are encountered you can still
send in a hard copy overnight. If you
encounter difficulties, please contact the
eGrants Help Desk at 1–301–231–9898
x142 (egrants-help@osophs,dhhs.gov),
or the Grants.gov Help Desk at 1–800–
518–4726 (support@grants.gov) to report
the problem and obtain assistance with
the system.
Upon successful submission via
eGrants, you will receive a confirmation
page indicating the date and time
(Eastern Time) of the electronic
application submission. The
confirmation will also provide a listing
of all items that constitute the final
application submission including all
electronic application components,
required hard copy original signatures,
and mail-in items, as well as the mailing
address of the Office of Grants
Management, OPHS, where all required
hard copy materials must be submitted
and received by the deadline specified
below. As items are received by that
office, the application status will be
updated to reflect their receipt.
Applicants are advised to monitor the
status of their applications in the OPHS
eGrants system to ensure that all
signatures and mail-in items are
received.
Upon successful submission via
Grants.gov, you will receive a
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
confirmation page indicating the date
and time (Eastern Time) of the
electronic application submission, as
well as the Grants.gov Receipt Number.
It is critical that you print and retain
this confirmation for their records, as
well as a copy of the entire application
package. Applications submitted via
Grants.gov also undergo a validation
process. Once the application is
successfully validated by Grants.gov,
you will again be notified and should
immediately mail all required hard copy
materials to the Office of Grants
Management, OPHS, to be received by
the deadline specified below. It is
critical that you clearly identify the
Organization name and Grants.gov
Application Receipt Number on all hard
copy materials. Validated applications
will be electronically transferred to the
OPHS eGrants system for processing.
Any applications deemed ‘‘Invalid’’ by
Grants.gov will not be transferred to the
eGrants system. OPHS has no
responsibility for any application that is
not validated and transferred to OPHS
from Grants.gov.
Electronic grant application
submissions must be submitted no later
than 5 p.m. Eastern Time on July 14,
2006. All required hard copy original
signatures and mail-in items must be
received by the Office of Grants
Management, OPHS, no later than 5
p.m. Eastern Time on the next business
day after the deadline.
Mailed or Hand-Delivered Hard Copy
Applications
Applicants who submit applications
in hard copy (via mail or handdelivered) are required to submit an
original and two copies of the complete
application. The original application
must be signed by an individual
authorized to act for the applicant
agency or organization and to assume
for the organization the obligations
imposed by the terms and conditions of
the grant award. The original and each
of the two copies must include all
required forms, certifications,
assurances, and appendices.
Mailed or hand-delivered applications
will be considered as meeting the
deadline if they are received by the
Office of Grants Management, OPHS, on
or before 5 p.m. Eastern Time on July
14, 2006. The application deadline date
requirement specified in this
announcement supersedes the
instructions in the OPHS–1.
Applications that do not meet the
deadline will be returned to the
applicant unread.
For applications submitted in hard
copy, send an original, signed in blue
ink, and two copies of the complete
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2006 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
application to: Ms. Karen Campbell,
Director, OPHS Office of Grants
Management, 1101 Wootton Parkway,
Suite 550, Rockville, MD 20852.
Required hard copy mail-in items
should be sent to this same address.
4. Intergovernmental Review
The Mississippi Institute for
Improvement of Geographic Minority
Health and Health Disparities Program
is subject to the requirements of
Executive Order 12372 which allows
States the option of setting up a system
for reviewing applications from within
their States for assistance under certain
Federal programs. Mississippi has
chosen to set up a review system and
has designated a State Single Point of
Contact (SPOC) for Mississippi.
The Mississippi SPOC is: Ms. Janet
Riddell, Clearinghouse Officer,
Department of Finance and
Administration, 1301 Woolfolk
Building, Suite E, 501 North West
Street, Jackson, Mississippi 39201.
Telephone: (601) 359–6762. Fax: (601)
359–6758 Jriddell@dfa.state.ms.us.
You should contact your SPOC as
early as possible to alert her to the
prospective application and receive any
necessary instructions on the State
process. The due date for the State
process recommendation is 60 days after
the application deadline established by
the OPHS Grants Management Officer.
The Office of Minority Health does not
guarantee that it will accommodate or
explain its responses to the State
process recommendation, if received
after that date. (See ‘‘Intergovernmental
Review of Federal Programs,’’ Executive
Order 12372, and 45 CFR Part 100 for
a description of the review process and
requirements).
The Mississippi Institute for
Improvement of Geographic Minority
Health and Health Disparities Program
is subject to Public Health Systems
Reporting Requirements. Under these
requirements, community-based nongovernmental applicants must prepare
and submit a Public Health System
Impact Statement (PHSIS). The PHSIS is
intended to provide information to State
and local officials to keep them apprised
of proposed health services grant
applications submitted by communitybased organizations within their
jurisdictions.
Community-based non-governmental
applicants are required to submit, no
later than the Federal due date for
receipt of the application, the following
information to the head of the
appropriate State or local health
agencies in the area(s) to be impacted:
(a) A copy of the face page of the
application (SF 424), and (b) a summary
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:47 Jun 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
of the project (PHSIS), not to exceed one
page, which provides: (1) A description
of the population to be served, (2) a
summary of the services to be provided,
and (3) a description of the coordination
planned with the appropriate State or
local health agencies. Copies of the
letter forwarding the PHSIS to these
authorities must be contained in the
application materials submitted to the
OPHS.
5. Funding Restrictions
Budget Request: If funding is
requested in an amount greater than the
ceiling of the award range, the
application will be considered nonresponsive and will not be entered into
the review process. The application will
be returned with notification that it did
not meet the submission requirements.
Grants funds may be used to cover
costs of:
Personnel.
Consultants.
Equipment.
Supplies.
Grant-related travel (domestic only).
Other grant-related costs.
Grants funds may not be used for:
Building alterations or renovations.
Construction.
Fund raising activities.
Job training.
Medical care, treatment or therapy.
Political education and lobbying.
Research studies involving human
subjects.
Vocational rehabilitation.
Guidance for completing the budget
can be found in the Program Guidelines,
which are included with the complete
application kit.
Section V. Application Review
Information
1. Criteria
The technical review of the
Mississippi Institute for Improvement of
Geographic Minority Health and Health
Disparities Program applications will
consider the following four generic
factors listed, in descending order of
weight.
A. Factor 1: Program Plan (35%)
Appropriateness and merit of
proposed approach and specific
activities for each of the four required
project components and each objective.
Logic and sequencing of the planned
approaches as they relate to the needs
of minority and rural populations in
Mississippi and to the objectives.
Soundness of the established
partnership and the roles of the partners
in the program.
Soundness of the plan for selfsufficiency and potential for the
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34367
Institute to be continued beyond Federal
funding.
Applicant’s capability to implement,
manage, and evaluate the project as
determined by:
—Qualifications and appropriateness of
proposed staff or requirements for ‘‘to
be hired’’ staff and consultants.
—Proposed level of effort for each staff
member.
—Management, research, and service
delivery experience of the applicant.
—The applicant’s organizational
structure and proposed project
organizational structure.
The applicant’s prominence and
influence in the state, connections to
critical players and information, ability
to bring together key individuals and
organizations from both the local and
state level to effect change.
—Appropriateness of defined roles
including staff reporting channels and
that of any proposed consultants.
—Clear lines of authority among the
proposed staff within and between the
partnering organizations.
B. Factor 2: Evaluation Plan (25%)
The degree to which expected results
are appropriate for objectives and
activities.
Appropriateness of the proposed data
collection plan (including demographic
data to be collected on project
participants), analysis and reporting
procedures.
Suitability of process, outcome, and
impact measures for this type of project.
Clarity and soundness of the intent
and plans to assess and document
progress towards achieving objectives,
planned activities, and intended
outcomes.
Potential for the proposed project to
impact the health status of the target
population(s).
Soundness of the plan for diffusing
project outcomes.
C. Factor 3: Background (20%)
Demonstrated experience with
addressing health problems for the
targeted populations in Mississippi.
Significance and prevalence of health
issues in the proposed community and
target population.
Extent to which the applicant
demonstrates access to the target
community(ies), and whether it is well
positioned and accepted within the
community(ies) to be served.
Extent and documented outcome of
past efforts and activities with the target
population.
D. Factor 4: Objectives (20%)
Merit of the objectives for each of the
four required program components (i.e.,
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
34368
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2006 / Notices
Research, Services, Education and
Health Information) .
Relevance to the OMH Program
purpose and expectations, and the
stated problems to be addressed by the
proposed project.
Degree to which the objectives are
stated in measurable terms.
Attainability of the objectives in the
stated time frames.
2. Review and Selection Process
Accepted Mississippi Institute for
Improvement of Geographic Minority
Health and Health Disparities Program
applications will be reviewed for
technical merit in accordance with PHS
policies. Applications will be evaluated
by an Objective Review Committee
(ORC). Committee members are chosen
for their expertise in minority health
and health disparities, and their
understanding of the unique health
problems and related issues confronted
by the racial, ethnic and rural
populations in the United States.
Funding decisions will be determined
by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Minority Health who will take under
consideration the recommendations and
ratings of the ORC.
3. Anticipated Award Date
September 1, 2006.
Section VI. Award Administration
Information
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
1. Award Notice
The successful applicant will receive
a notification letter from the Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Minority Health
and a Notice of Grant Award (NGA),
signed by the OPHS Grants Management
Officer. The NGA shall be the only
binding, authorizing document between
the recipient and the Office of Minority
Health. Unsuccessful applicants will
receive notification from OPHS.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
In accepting this award, the grantee
stipulates that the award and any
activities thereunder are subject to all
provisions of 45 CFR parts 74 and 92,
currently in effect or implemented
during the period of the grant.
The DHHS Appropriations Act
requires that, when issuing statements,
press releases, requests for proposals,
bid solicitations, and other documents
describing projects or programs funded
in whole or in part with Federal money,
all grantees shall clearly state the
percentage and dollar amount of the
total costs of the program or project
which will be financed with Federal
money and the percentage and dollar
amount of the total costs of the project
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:47 Jun 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
or program that will be financed by nongovernmental sources.
3. Reporting Requirements
The successful applicant under this
notice will submit: (1) Semi-annual
progress reports; (2) an annual Financial
Status Report; and (3) a final progress
report and Financial Status Report in
the format established by the OMH, in
accordance with provisions of the
general regulations which apply under
‘‘Monitoring and Reporting Program
Performance,’’ 45 CFR Part 74.51–74.52,
with the excepting of State and local
governments to which 45 CFR part 92,
Subpart C reporting requirements apply.
Uniform Data Set: The Uniform Data
Set (UDS) is a web-based system used
by OMH grantees to electronically
report progress data to OMH. It allows
OMH to more clearly and systematically
link grant activities to OMH-wide goals
and objectives, and document
programming impacts and results. All
OMH grantees are required to report
program information via the UDS
(https://www.dsgonline.com/omh/uds).
Training will be provided on the use of
the UDS system.
The grantee will be informed of the
progress report due dates and means of
submission. Instructions and report
format will be provided prior to the
required due date. The Annual
Financial Status Report is due no later
than 90 days after the close of each
budget period. The final progress report
and Financial Status Report are due 90
days after the end of the project period.
Instructions and due dates will
provided prior to required submission.
Section VII. Agency Contacts
For questions on budget and business
aspects for the application, contact Mr.
DeWayne Wynn, Grants Management
Specialist, OPHS Office of Grants
Management, Tower Building, 1101
Wootton Parkway, Suite 550, Rockville,
MD 20852. Mr. Wynn can be reached by
telephone at (240) 453–8822; or by email at dwynn@osophs.dhh.gov.
For questions related to the
Mississippi Institute for Improvement of
Geographic Minority Health and Health
Disparities Program or assistance in
preparing a grant proposal, contact Ms.
Cynthia Amis, Director, Division of
Program Operations, Office of Minority
Health, Tower Building, Suite 600, 1101
Wootton Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852.
Ms. Amis can be reached by telephone
at (240) 453–8444; or by e-mail at
camis@osophs.dhhs.gov.
For additional technical assistance,
contact the OMH Regional Minority
Health Consultant for your region listed
in your grant application kit.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For health information, call the OMH
Resource Center (OMHRC) at 1–800–
444–6472.
Section VIII. Other Information
1. Healthy People 2010
The Public Health Service (PHS) is
committed to achieving the health
promoting and disease prevention
objectives of Healthy People 2010, a
PHS-led national activity announced in
January 2000 to eliminate health
disparities and improve years and
quality of life. More information may be
found on the Healthy People 2010 Web
site: https://www.healthypeople.gov and
copies of the documents may be
downloaded. Copies of the Healthy
People 2010: Volumes I and II can be
purchased by calling (202) 512–1800
(cost $70.00 for printed version; $20.00
for CD–ROM). Another reference is the
Healthy People 2010 Final Review-2001.
For one free copy of the Healthy
People 2010, contact: The National
Center for Health Statistics, Division of
Data Services, 3311 Toledo Road,
Hyattsville, MD 20782, or by telephone
at (301) 458–4636. Ask for HHS
Publication No. (PHS) 99–1256. This
document may also be downloaded
from: https://www.healthypeople.gov.
2. Definitions
For purposes of this announcement,
the following definitions apply:
Community-Based Organizations—
Private, nonprofit organizations that are
representative of communities or
significant segments of communities
where the control and decision making
powers are located at the community
level.
Community-Based, Minority-Serving
Organization—A community-based
organization that has a history of service
to racial/ethnic minority populations.
(See Definition of Minority Populations
below.)
Minority Populations—American
Indian or Alaska Native; Asian; Black or
African American; Hispanic or Latino;
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific
Islander (42 U.S.C. 300u–6, section 1707
of the Public Health Service Act, as
amended)
Nonprofit Organizations—
Corporations or associations, no part of
whose net earnings may lawfully inure
to the benefit of any private shareholder
or individual. Proof of nonprofit status
must be submitted by private nonprofit
organizations with the application or, if
previously filed with PHS, the applicant
must state where and when the proof
was submitted.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2006 / Notices
Dated: May 26, 2006.
Garth N. Graham,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Minority
Health.
[FR Doc. E6–9315 Filed 6–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Meeting of the Citizens’ Health Care
Working Group
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee
Act, this notice announces a meeting of
the Citizens’ Health Care Working
Group (the Working Group) mandated
by section 1014 of the Medicare
Modernization Act.
DATES: A business meeting of the
Working Group will be held on
Wednesday June 21, 2006 and Thursday
June 22, 2006. On June 21st, the session
will begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 4 p.m.
On June 22nd, the session will begin at
8:30 a.m. and end at 2 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place
at the conference room of the United
Food and Commercial Workers
International Union. The office is
located at 1775 K Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20006. The main
receptionist area is location on the 7th
floor; the conference room is located on
the 11th floor. The meeting is open to
the public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caroline Taplin, Citizens’ Health Care
Working Group, at (301) 443–1514 or
caroline.taplin@ahrq.hhs.gov. If sign
language interpretation or other
reasonable accommodation for a
disability is needed, please contact Mr.
Donald L. Inniss, Director, Office of
Equal Employment Opportunity
Program, Program Support Center, on
(301) 443–1144.
The agenda for this Working Group
meeting will be available on the
Citizens’ Working Group Web site,
www.citizenshealthcare.gov. also
available at that site is a roster of
Working Group members. When a
summary of this meeting is completed,
it will also be available on the Web site.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
1014 of Public Law 108–173, (known as
the Medicare Modernization Act) directs
the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services (DHHS),
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:47 Jun 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
acting through the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality, to
establish a Citizens’ Health Care
Working Group (Citizen Group). This
statutory provision, codified at 42
U.S.C. 299 n., directs the Working
Group to: (1) Identify options for
changing our health care system so that
every American has the ability to obtain
quality, affordable health care coverage;
(2) provide for a nationwide public
debate about improving the health care
system; and, (3) submit its
recommendations to the President and
the Congress.
The Citizens’ Health Care Working
Group is composed of 15 members: The
Secretary of DHHS is designated as a
member by statute. The Comptroller
General of the U.S. Government
Accountability Office (GAO) was
directed to name the remaining 14
members whose appointments were
announced on February 28, 2005.
Working Group Meeting Agenda
The Working Group meeting on June
21st and June 22nd will be devoted to
ongoing Working Group business. The
principal topic to be addressed will be
the continued refinement of materials
associated with the Working Group’s
interim recommendations which were
posted ont he Working Group’s Web site
https://www.citizenshealthcare.gov on
June 2, 2006.
Submission of Written Information
To fulfill its charge described above,
the Working Group has been conducting
a public dialogue on health care in
America through public meetings held
across the country and through
comments received on its Web site. The
Working Group invites members of the
public to the Web site to be part of that
dialogue.
Further, the Working Group will
accept written submissions for
consideration at the Working Group
business meeting listed above. In
general, individuals or organizations
wishing to provide written information
for consideration by the Citizens’ Health
Care Working Group at this meeting
should submit information
electronically to
citizenshealth@ahrq.gov.
Dated: June 5, 2006.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 06–5377 Filed 6–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4610–90–M
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34369
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Citizen’s Health Care Working Group
Interim Recommendations
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.
ACTION: Publication of Interim
Recommendations of the Citizens’
Health Care Working Group, Request for
Public Comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Citizens’ Health Care
Working Group (the Working Group),
authorized by section 1014 of the
Medicare Modernization Act, is
publishing interim recommendations
and requesting public comment on
them.
DATES: Comments should be received on
or before August 31, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted either electronically or on
paper.
Electronic Statements
Send comments online to the Work
Group’s Web site using this address:
https://www.citizenshealthcare.gov. or by
e-mail to Citzenshealth@ahrq.gov
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in duplicate to:
George Grob, Executive Director,
Citizens’ Health Care Working Group,
Suite 575, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814. You may
also fax comments to (301) 480–3095.
To help us review your comments
efficiently please use only one method
of commenting.
All comments will be made available
on the Working Group’s Web site. All
comments will be posted without
change. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. Comments will also
be available for public inspection and
copying at the Working Group’s
Bethesda office during normal business
hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Grob, Executive Director,
Citizens’ Health Care Working Group,
(301) 443–1530,
george.grob@ahrq.hhs.gov or Caroline
Taplin, Senior Program Analyst, (301)
443–1514, caroline.taplin@ahrq.hhs.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
1014 of Pub. L. 108–173, (known as the
Medicare Modernization Act) directs the
Secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services (DHHS), acting
through the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality, to establish a
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34362-34369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-9315]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Mississippi Institute for Improvement of Geographic Minority
Health and Health Disparities Program
AGENCY: Office of Minority Health, Office of Public Health and Science,
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 34363]]
Announcement Type: Competitive Initial Announcement of Availability
of Funds.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: Mississippi
Institute for Improvement of Geographic Minority Health and Health
Disparities Program--93.137.
DATES: Application Availability Date: June 14, 2006. Application
Deadline: July 14, 2006.
SUMMARY: This announcement is made by the United States Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS or Department), Office of Minority
Health (OMH) located within the Office of Public Health and Science
(OPHS), and working in a ``One-Department'' approach collaboratively
with participating HHS agencies and programs (entities). The mission of
the OMH is to improve the health of racial and ethnic minority
populations through the development of policies and programs that
address disparities and gaps. OMH serves as the focal point in the HHS
for leadership, policy development and coordination, service
demonstrations, information exchange, coalition and partnership
building, and related efforts to address the health needs of racial and
ethnic minorities. This announcement supports the Healthy People 2010
overarching goal to eliminate health disparities.
As part of a continuing HHS effort to improve the health and well
being of racial and ethnic minorities, the Department announces
availability of FY 2006 funding for the Mississippi Institute for
Improvement of Geographic Minority Health and Health Disparities
Program. Despite significant improvements in the overall health status
of the nation over the past decades, disparities in health status
continue to persist among racial and ethnic minority and disadvantaged
populations. Such disparities are clearly illustrated by health status
statistics in southern areas of the United States. Mississippi serves
as an important pilot location for the development of a geographic and
minority health disparities model for the nation. Mississippi has a
population of 2.8 million, 37 percent of whom are African American, and
51percent of whom live in rural areas. It is the fourth most rural
state in the nation, and is ranked 31st in terms of population size.
The significant disease burden of the state is well documented. It
ranks first of all states and the District of Columbia in mortality
rates due to cardiovascular disease (30 percent higher than the
national average). In 1996, the cardiovascular disease-related death
rate for African Americans in the state was 37 percent greater than for
whites, and 60 percent greater than the overall national rate. Stroke
mortality, the third leading cause of death in Mississippi, is 18
percent higher than the rate for the U.S. as a whole. It has the
highest prevalence of diabetes and obesity in the nation; approximately
9 percent of the state's adult population are diabetic and 55 percent
are obese. Mississippi ranks 5th highest overall in cancer mortality
rates among the 50 states and the District of Columbia. African
Americans make up more than 75 percent of the state's reported new AIDS
cases. Premature death rates are almost 2 times greater for American
Indians and 1.5 times greater for African Americans than whites. The
infant mortality rate in a number of counties along the Mississippi
Delta is three times that of the national average.
Mississippi has many challenges affecting access to medical care.
Almost one-quarter of the state's population, aged 18 to 64, report
having no health insurance; higher than the 15.7 percent of people
nationally without health insurance in 2004, according to the U.S.
Census. Other reasons for insufficient access include the state's ratio
of medical doctors to its general population, which is about half the
national average, and the large percentage of rural, sparsely-populated
areas within the state. Access to health care and delivery of services
to a sizeable population in Mississippi, already inadequate, have been
further impacted by the devastation caused by last year's hurricanes.
The Gulf Coast of Mississippi suffered massive damage from the impact
of Hurricane Katrina on August 29, 2005, leaving 236 people dead, 67
missing, and an estimated $125 billion in damages. Mississippi's
healthcare system has been seriously disrupted, resulting in new health
problems for people living in affected areas. The grant will provide an
opportunity to address these health problems and to aid in
restructuring the healthcare system.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
1. Purpose
2. OMH Expectations
3. Applicant Project Results
4. Project Requirements
Section II. Award Information
Section III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
3. Other
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
3. Submission Dates and Time
4. Intergovernmental Review
5. Funding Restrictions
Section V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
2. Review and Selection Process
3. Anticipated Award Date
Section VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
3. Reporting Requirements
Section VII. Agency Contacts
Section VIII. Other Information
1. Healthy People 2010
2. Definitions
Section I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: This program is authorized under 42 U.S.C. 300u-6,
section 1707 of the Public Health Service Act, as amended.
1. Purpose
The Mississippi Institute for Improvement of Geographic Minority
Health and Health Disparities Program is designed to address the many
and significant health disparities faced by rural disadvantaged and
minority populations throughout the state. This program is intended to
demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of a targeted and
multifaceted statewide approach for eliminating health disparities. The
grant requires a multi-partner effort, involving institutions of higher
education, state and local health agencies, faith and community-based
organizations, healthcare organizations, and other stakeholders to
tackle the state-wide challenge.
2. OMH Expectations
It is expected that the model will fill an existing void for
addressing the significant and increasing disparities among the
targeted populations and communities in Mississippi that will lead to:
Increased awareness by all populations of healthcare issues
impacting rural disadvantaged and minority communities;
Increased access to quality healthcare for rural disadvantaged and
minority populations;
Increased number of healthcare personnel available to provide
services to rural disadvantaged and minority populations;
[[Page 34364]]
Improved health outcomes for rural disadvantaged and minority
populations.
Over the long term, OMH intends to use the model developed under
this project and variations of the model to address national policies
and programs to improve the health of rural disadvantaged and minority
communities.
3. Applicant Project Results
Applicants must identify anticipated project results that are
consistent with the overall program purpose and OMH expectations.
Project results should fall within the following general categories:
Mobilizing Communities and Partnerships
Increasing Knowledge and Awareness
Changing Behavior and Utilization
Increasing Access to Health Care Services
Policy Research
Changing Systems
Improving Data and Evaluation
4. Project Requirements
Each applicant under the proposed model program must propose to:
Establish the Mississippi Institute for Improvement of Geographic
Minority Health and Health Disparities to serve as a hub of state-wide
activity, services and information on health disparities and the impact
on Mississippi's racial, ethnic, and rural communities. Form
partnerships with health professions schools, state and/or local health
agencies, healthcare organizations, faith and community based
organizations, and other stakeholders to build the research/science/
knowledge base on health disparities and evidence-based practices;
foster dialogue on public policy, research and health system issues;
carry out community outreach and other public education/awareness
activities; develop and disseminate culturally appropriate educational
materials for healthcare providers and consumers; promote training of a
culturally diverse healthcare workforce; train providers to deliver
appropriate care to rural and minority communities; and address the use
of technology to improve the quality of health systems and delivery of
care. Develop, establish, and conduct programs, initiatives, and
activities through four core components within the Institute: Research,
Services, Education/Awareness, and Health Information.
Develop a cadre of researchers/investigators from historically
black colleges and universities within the state.
Establish an advisory board to provide advice and guidance on
program implementation, design, and direction.
A signed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the applicant
organization and each partner organization must be submitted with the
application. Each MOA must clearly detail the roles and resources
(including in-kind) that each entity will bring to the project; state
the duration and terms of the agreement; cover the entire project
period; and be signed by an individual with the authority to represent
the organization.
Section II. Award Information
Estimated Funds Available for Competition: $5,000,000 in FY 2006.
Anticipated Number of Awards: 1.
Range of Awards: $5,000,000.
Anticipated Start Date: September 1, 2006.
Period of Performance: 3 Years (September 1, 2006 to August 31,
2009).
Budget Period Length: 12 months.
Type of Award: Grant.
Type of Application Accepted: New.
Section III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
To qualify for funding, an applicant must be located in the State
of Mississippi and must be a:
(1) Health professions school or academic health center; or
(2) Private nonprofit community-based, minority-serving
organization which addresses health or human services; or
(3) State or local government agency which addresses health or
human services.
This competition is limited to the State of Mississippi.
Other entities that meet the definition of private non-profit
community-based, minority-serving organization and the above criteria
that are eligible to apply are:
Faith-based organizations.
Tribal governments and organizations.
The organization submitting the application will:
Serve as the lead agency for the project, responsible for its
implementation and management; and
Serve as the fiscal agent for the Federal grant awarded.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
Matching funds are not required for the Institute Program.
3. Other
This competition is limited to the State of Mississippi, based on
its dire health care needs as described in the Summary. Additionally,
due to last year's hurricanes, Mississippi's healthcare system has been
seriously disrupted, adding to the myriad of health problems for people
living in the state. The grant will provide an opportunity to address
these health problems and to aid in restructuring the healthcare
system.
If funding is requested in an amount greater than the ceiling of
the award range, the application will be considered non-responsive and
will not be entered into the review process. The application will be
returned with notification that it did not meet the submission
requirements.
Applications that are not complete or that do not conform to or
address the criteria of this announcement will be considered non-
responsive and will not be entered into the review process. The
application will be returned with notification that it did not meet the
submission requirements.
No more than one application per organization may be submitted to
the Mississippi Institute for Improvement of Geographic Minority Health
and Health Disparities Program. Those organizations submitting more
than one proposal for this grant program will be deemed ineligible, and
the proposals will be returned without comment.
Organizations are not eligible to receive funding from more than
one OMH grant program to carry out the same project and/or activities.
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package
Application kits may be obtained: At https://www.omhrc.gov. By
writing to the Office of Grants Management, OPHS, Tower Building, 1101
Wootton Parkway, Suite 550, Rockville, MD 20852; or contact the Office
of Grants Management at (240) 453-8822. Application kits may also be
requested by fax at (240) 453-8823. Please specify the program name,
Mississippi Institute for Improvement of Geographic Minority Health and
Health Disparities Project, when requesting an application kit.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
A. Application and Submission
Applicants must use Grant Application Form OPHS-1 and complete the
Face Page/Cover Page (SF 424), Checklist, and Budget Information Forms
for Non-Construction Programs (SF 424A). In addition, the application
must contain a project narrative. The project narrative (including
summary
[[Page 34365]]
and appendices) is limited to 60 pages double-spaced.
The narrative must be printed on one side of 8\1/2\ by 11 inch
white paper, with one inch margins, double-spaced and 12-point font.
All pages must be numbered sequentially including any appendices. (Do
not use decimals or letters, such as: 1.3 or 2A.) Do not staple or bind
the application package.
The narrative description of the project must contain the
following, in the order presented:
Table of Contents.
Project Summary: Describe key aspects of the Background,
Objectives, Program Plan, and Evaluation Plan. The summary is limited
to 3 pages.
Background:
Statement of Need: Provide a clearly stated description of the
scope of the problems to be addressed by the project, and methods that
will be implemented to create an Institute focusing on research,
services, education/awareness, and health information. Identify partner
organizations and provide the rationale for including them in the
project.
Organizational Capability: Discuss the applicant organization's
experience in managing project/activities, especially those targeting
the population to be served, and the major accomplishments achieved.
Indicate where the Institute will be located within the organization's
structure, the reporting channel and how this location will allow the
Institute to be successful with an effort of this magnitude. Provide a
chart of the proposed project's organizational structure, showing who
will report to whom and how this structure will facilitate efficient
communications and timely action on key project activities. Describe
how the partner organizations will interface with the applicant
organization.
Objectives: State objectives in measurable terms, with baseline
data and quantified expected outcome(s), and realistic target date(s)
for achievement. Objectives must address each of the four program
components (i.e., research, services, education/awareness, and health
information) as spelled out under the Project Requirements section.
Program Plan: Describe in detail the specific project activities
and strategies to be implemented to achieve each stated objective. The
description should encompass information about how, when, where, for
whom, and by whom activities will take place. Include a description of
the active role of partner organizations in the development and
implementation phases of the project. Include projected numbers of
participants/beneficiaries for each activity/service. Activities must
be conducted in the areas of research, services, education/awareness,
and health information.
--Research. At a minimum, this activity must include:
(1) Strategies for improving the quantity and quality of data and
information on the health status of rural and minority populations;
identification of key health factors impacting the health of rural and
minority populations; and methods for tracking changes in the health
status of the targeted populations.
(2) Preventive and clinical interventions to improve the health
status of rural and minority populations.
(3) Research centered on delivery of healthcare services and health
policy.
--Services. At a minimum, this activity must include:
(1) Strategies, methods, and/or program models to increase the
health status of rural and minority populations using community and
evidence-based service delivery models that integrate and more
efficiently manage existing health care resources.
--Education/Awareness. At a minimum, this activity must include:
(1) Strategies for improving availability and accessibility of
information in a format and in venues that reach individuals, health
care providers/practitioners, health care organizations/associations,
business leaders and others.
(2) Community-based health education and consumer education models.
(3) Training of primary healthcare providers from diverse
backgrounds, both geographic and racial/ethnic, to better serve the
target population and to increase the number and availability of
healthcare providers serving these populations.
(4) Training efforts designed to expand the health education
pipeline.
--Health Information. At a minimum, this activity must include:
(1) An electronic medical records system that would be accessible
by both providers and patients.
(2) An interconnected, state-wide health data exchange network.
Discuss strategies and identify funding sources for sustaining the
Institute and all of its activities after the end of the Federally
funded project period. Provide a timetable and the level of financial
support needed to achieve self-sufficiency.
Provide a description of the proposed program staff, including
resumes and job descriptions for key staff, qualifications and
responsibilities of each staff member, and percent of time each will
commit to the project. Provide a description of duties for any proposed
consultants. Describe any products to be developed by the project.
Provide a timeline for the project.
Evaluation Plan: The evaluation plan must clearly articulate how
program activities will be evaluated. The evaluation plan must be able
to produce documented results that demonstrate whether and how the
strategies and activities funded under the Program made a difference in
eliminating racial/ethnic and rural health disparities. The plan should
identify the expected results (i.e., a particular impact, outcome or
product) for each objective and major activity. The description should
include data collection and analysis methods, demographic data to be
collected on project participants, process measures describing
indicators to be used to monitor and measure progress toward achieving
projected results by objective, outcome measures to determine if the
project has accomplished planned activities, and impact measures to
demonstrate achievement of the goal to positively affect health
disparities.
Discuss plans to document the steps which others may follow to
replicate the proposed project in similar communities. Describe a
comprehensive plan for diffusion of project results to other
communities. The plan must include expectations for publishing results
in professional literature and to communities in a manner and through
venues that they access.
In addition to the project narrative, the application must contain
a detailed budget justification which includes a narrative explanation
and indicates the computation of expenditures for each year for which
grant support is requested. (The budget justification does not count
toward the page limitation.)
B. Data Universal Numbering System number (DUNS)
Applications must have a Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal
Numbering System number as the universal identifier when applying for
Federal grants. The D&B number can be obtained by calling (866) 705-
5711 or through the Web site at https://www.dnb.com/us/.
3. Submission Dates and Times
Application Deadline Date: July 14, 2006.
Submission Mechanisms
The Office of Public Health and Science provides multiple
mechanisms
[[Page 34366]]
for the submission of applications, as described in the following
sections. Applicants will receive notification via mail from the Office
of Grants Management, OPHS, confirming the receipt of applications
submitted using any of these mechanisms. Applications submitted after
the deadline described below will not be accepted for review.
Applications that do not conform to the requirements of the grant
announcement will not be accepted for review and will be returned to
the applicant.
You may submit your application in either electronic or paper
format.
To submit an application electronically, use either the OPHS
eGrants web site, https://egrants.osophs.dhhs.gov or the Grants.gov web
site, https://www.Grants.gov/. OMH will not accept grant applications
via any other means of electronic communication, including email or
facsimile transmission.
Electronic Submission
If you choose to submit your application electronically, please
note the following: Electronic submission is voluntary, but strongly
encouraged. You will not receive additional point value because you
submit a grant application in electronic format, nor will you be
penalized if you submit an application in paper format. The electronic
application for this program may be accessed on https://
egrants.osophs.dhhs.gov (eGrants) or on https://www.grants.gov/
(Grants.gov). If using Grants.gov, you must search for the downloadable
application package by the CFDA number (93.910).
When you enter the eGrants or the Grants.gov sites, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically, as well as
the hours of operation. We strongly recommend that you do not wait
until the deadline date to begin the application process. Visit eGrants
or Grants.gov at least 30 days prior to filing your application to
fully understand the process and requirements. Grants.gov requires
organizations to successfully complete a registration process prior to
submission of an application. The body of the application and required
forms can be submitted electronically using either system. Electronic
submissions must contain all forms required by the application kit, as
well as the Program Narrative, Budget Narrative, and any appendices or
exhibits. Applicants using eGrants are also required to submit, by
mail, a hard copy of the face page (SF424) with the original signature
of an individual authorized to act for the applicant agency or
organization and to assume for the organization the obligations imposed
by the terms and conditions of the grant award. (Applicants using
Grants.gov are not required to submit a hard copy of the SF424, as
Grants.gov uses digital signature technology.) If required, applicants
using eGrants may also need to submit a hard copy of SF LLL, and/or
certain program related forms (e.g., Program certifications) with
original signatures.
Any other hard copy materials, or documents requiring signature,
must also be submitted via mail. Mail-in items may only include
publications, resumes, or organizational documentation. (If applying
via eGrants, the applicant must identify the mail-in items on the
Application Checklist at the time of electronic submission.) The
application will not be considered complete until both the electronic
application components and any hard copy materials or original
signatures are received. All mailed items must be received by the
Office of Grants Management, OPHS by the deadline specified below.
Your application must comply with any page limitation requirements
described in this program announcement.
We strongly encourage you to submit your electronic application
well before the closing date and time so that if difficulties are
encountered you can still send in a hard copy overnight. If you
encounter difficulties, please contact the eGrants Help Desk at 1-301-
231-9898 x142 (egrants-help@osophs,dhhs.gov), or the Grants.gov Help
Desk at 1-800-518-4726 (support@grants.gov) to report the problem and
obtain assistance with the system.
Upon successful submission via eGrants, you will receive a
confirmation page indicating the date and time (Eastern Time) of the
electronic application submission. The confirmation will also provide a
listing of all items that constitute the final application submission
including all electronic application components, required hard copy
original signatures, and mail-in items, as well as the mailing address
of the Office of Grants Management, OPHS, where all required hard copy
materials must be submitted and received by the deadline specified
below. As items are received by that office, the application status
will be updated to reflect their receipt. Applicants are advised to
monitor the status of their applications in the OPHS eGrants system to
ensure that all signatures and mail-in items are received.
Upon successful submission via Grants.gov, you will receive a
confirmation page indicating the date and time (Eastern Time) of the
electronic application submission, as well as the Grants.gov Receipt
Number. It is critical that you print and retain this confirmation for
their records, as well as a copy of the entire application package.
Applications submitted via Grants.gov also undergo a validation
process. Once the application is successfully validated by Grants.gov,
you will again be notified and should immediately mail all required
hard copy materials to the Office of Grants Management, OPHS, to be
received by the deadline specified below. It is critical that you
clearly identify the Organization name and Grants.gov Application
Receipt Number on all hard copy materials. Validated applications will
be electronically transferred to the OPHS eGrants system for
processing. Any applications deemed ``Invalid'' by Grants.gov will not
be transferred to the eGrants system. OPHS has no responsibility for
any application that is not validated and transferred to OPHS from
Grants.gov.
Electronic grant application submissions must be submitted no later
than 5 p.m. Eastern Time on July 14, 2006. All required hard copy
original signatures and mail-in items must be received by the Office of
Grants Management, OPHS, no later than 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the next
business day after the deadline.
Mailed or Hand-Delivered Hard Copy Applications
Applicants who submit applications in hard copy (via mail or hand-
delivered) are required to submit an original and two copies of the
complete application. The original application must be signed by an
individual authorized to act for the applicant agency or organization
and to assume for the organization the obligations imposed by the terms
and conditions of the grant award. The original and each of the two
copies must include all required forms, certifications, assurances, and
appendices.
Mailed or hand-delivered applications will be considered as meeting
the deadline if they are received by the Office of Grants Management,
OPHS, on or before 5 p.m. Eastern Time on July 14, 2006. The
application deadline date requirement specified in this announcement
supersedes the instructions in the OPHS-1. Applications that do not
meet the deadline will be returned to the applicant unread.
For applications submitted in hard copy, send an original, signed
in blue ink, and two copies of the complete
[[Page 34367]]
application to: Ms. Karen Campbell, Director, OPHS Office of Grants
Management, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 550, Rockville, MD 20852.
Required hard copy mail-in items should be sent to this same address.
4. Intergovernmental Review
The Mississippi Institute for Improvement of Geographic Minority
Health and Health Disparities Program is subject to the requirements of
Executive Order 12372 which allows States the option of setting up a
system for reviewing applications from within their States for
assistance under certain Federal programs. Mississippi has chosen to
set up a review system and has designated a State Single Point of
Contact (SPOC) for Mississippi.
The Mississippi SPOC is: Ms. Janet Riddell, Clearinghouse Officer,
Department of Finance and Administration, 1301 Woolfolk Building, Suite
E, 501 North West Street, Jackson, Mississippi 39201. Telephone: (601)
359-6762. Fax: (601) 359-6758 Jriddell@dfa.state.ms.us.
You should contact your SPOC as early as possible to alert her to
the prospective application and receive any necessary instructions on
the State process. The due date for the State process recommendation is
60 days after the application deadline established by the OPHS Grants
Management Officer. The Office of Minority Health does not guarantee
that it will accommodate or explain its responses to the State process
recommendation, if received after that date. (See ``Intergovernmental
Review of Federal Programs,'' Executive Order 12372, and 45 CFR Part
100 for a description of the review process and requirements).
The Mississippi Institute for Improvement of Geographic Minority
Health and Health Disparities Program is subject to Public Health
Systems Reporting Requirements. Under these requirements, community-
based non-governmental applicants must prepare and submit a Public
Health System Impact Statement (PHSIS). The PHSIS is intended to
provide information to State and local officials to keep them apprised
of proposed health services grant applications submitted by community-
based organizations within their jurisdictions.
Community-based non-governmental applicants are required to submit,
no later than the Federal due date for receipt of the application, the
following information to the head of the appropriate State or local
health agencies in the area(s) to be impacted: (a) A copy of the face
page of the application (SF 424), and (b) a summary of the project
(PHSIS), not to exceed one page, which provides: (1) A description of
the population to be served, (2) a summary of the services to be
provided, and (3) a description of the coordination planned with the
appropriate State or local health agencies. Copies of the letter
forwarding the PHSIS to these authorities must be contained in the
application materials submitted to the OPHS.
5. Funding Restrictions
Budget Request: If funding is requested in an amount greater than
the ceiling of the award range, the application will be considered non-
responsive and will not be entered into the review process. The
application will be returned with notification that it did not meet the
submission requirements.
Grants funds may be used to cover costs of:
Personnel.
Consultants.
Equipment.
Supplies.
Grant-related travel (domestic only).
Other grant-related costs.
Grants funds may not be used for:
Building alterations or renovations.
Construction.
Fund raising activities.
Job training.
Medical care, treatment or therapy.
Political education and lobbying.
Research studies involving human subjects.
Vocational rehabilitation.
Guidance for completing the budget can be found in the Program
Guidelines, which are included with the complete application kit.
Section V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
The technical review of the Mississippi Institute for Improvement
of Geographic Minority Health and Health Disparities Program
applications will consider the following four generic factors listed,
in descending order of weight.
A. Factor 1: Program Plan (35%)
Appropriateness and merit of proposed approach and specific
activities for each of the four required project components and each
objective.
Logic and sequencing of the planned approaches as they relate to
the needs of minority and rural populations in Mississippi and to the
objectives.
Soundness of the established partnership and the roles of the
partners in the program.
Soundness of the plan for self-sufficiency and potential for the
Institute to be continued beyond Federal funding.
Applicant's capability to implement, manage, and evaluate the
project as determined by:
--Qualifications and appropriateness of proposed staff or requirements
for ``to be hired'' staff and consultants.
--Proposed level of effort for each staff member.
--Management, research, and service delivery experience of the
applicant.
--The applicant's organizational structure and proposed project
organizational structure.
The applicant's prominence and influence in the state, connections
to critical players and information, ability to bring together key
individuals and organizations from both the local and state level to
effect change.
--Appropriateness of defined roles including staff reporting channels
and that of any proposed consultants.
--Clear lines of authority among the proposed staff within and between
the partnering organizations.
B. Factor 2: Evaluation Plan (25%)
The degree to which expected results are appropriate for
objectives and activities.
Appropriateness of the proposed data collection plan (including
demographic data to be collected on project participants), analysis and
reporting procedures.
Suitability of process, outcome, and impact measures for this type
of project.
Clarity and soundness of the intent and plans to assess and
document progress towards achieving objectives, planned activities, and
intended outcomes.
Potential for the proposed project to impact the health status of
the target population(s).
Soundness of the plan for diffusing project outcomes.
C. Factor 3: Background (20%)
Demonstrated experience with addressing health problems for the
targeted populations in Mississippi.
Significance and prevalence of health issues in the proposed
community and target population.
Extent to which the applicant demonstrates access to the target
community(ies), and whether it is well positioned and accepted within
the community(ies) to be served.
Extent and documented outcome of past efforts and activities with
the target population.
D. Factor 4: Objectives (20%)
Merit of the objectives for each of the four required program
components (i.e.,
[[Page 34368]]
Research, Services, Education and Health Information) .
Relevance to the OMH Program purpose and expectations, and the
stated problems to be addressed by the proposed project.
Degree to which the objectives are stated in measurable terms.
Attainability of the objectives in the stated time frames.
2. Review and Selection Process
Accepted Mississippi Institute for Improvement of Geographic
Minority Health and Health Disparities Program applications will be
reviewed for technical merit in accordance with PHS policies.
Applications will be evaluated by an Objective Review Committee (ORC).
Committee members are chosen for their expertise in minority health and
health disparities, and their understanding of the unique health
problems and related issues confronted by the racial, ethnic and rural
populations in the United States. Funding decisions will be determined
by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Minority Health who will take
under consideration the recommendations and ratings of the ORC.
3. Anticipated Award Date
September 1, 2006.
Section VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notice
The successful applicant will receive a notification letter from
the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Minority Health and a Notice of
Grant Award (NGA), signed by the OPHS Grants Management Officer. The
NGA shall be the only binding, authorizing document between the
recipient and the Office of Minority Health. Unsuccessful applicants
will receive notification from OPHS.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
In accepting this award, the grantee stipulates that the award and
any activities thereunder are subject to all provisions of 45 CFR parts
74 and 92, currently in effect or implemented during the period of the
grant.
The DHHS Appropriations Act requires that, when issuing statements,
press releases, requests for proposals, bid solicitations, and other
documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part
with Federal money, all grantees shall clearly state the percentage and
dollar amount of the total costs of the program or project which will
be financed with Federal money and the percentage and dollar amount of
the total costs of the project or program that will be financed by non-
governmental sources.
3. Reporting Requirements
The successful applicant under this notice will submit: (1) Semi-
annual progress reports; (2) an annual Financial Status Report; and (3)
a final progress report and Financial Status Report in the format
established by the OMH, in accordance with provisions of the general
regulations which apply under ``Monitoring and Reporting Program
Performance,'' 45 CFR Part 74.51-74.52, with the excepting of State and
local governments to which 45 CFR part 92, Subpart C reporting
requirements apply.
Uniform Data Set: The Uniform Data Set (UDS) is a web-based system
used by OMH grantees to electronically report progress data to OMH. It
allows OMH to more clearly and systematically link grant activities to
OMH-wide goals and objectives, and document programming impacts and
results. All OMH grantees are required to report program information
via the UDS (https://www.dsgonline.com/omh/uds). Training will be
provided on the use of the UDS system.
The grantee will be informed of the progress report due dates and
means of submission. Instructions and report format will be provided
prior to the required due date. The Annual Financial Status Report is
due no later than 90 days after the close of each budget period. The
final progress report and Financial Status Report are due 90 days after
the end of the project period. Instructions and due dates will provided
prior to required submission.
Section VII. Agency Contacts
For questions on budget and business aspects for the application,
contact Mr. DeWayne Wynn, Grants Management Specialist, OPHS Office of
Grants Management, Tower Building, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 550,
Rockville, MD 20852. Mr. Wynn can be reached by telephone at (240) 453-
8822; or by e-mail at dwynn@osophs.dhh.gov.
For questions related to the Mississippi Institute for Improvement
of Geographic Minority Health and Health Disparities Program or
assistance in preparing a grant proposal, contact Ms. Cynthia Amis,
Director, Division of Program Operations, Office of Minority Health,
Tower Building, Suite 600, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852.
Ms. Amis can be reached by telephone at (240) 453-8444; or by e-mail at
camis@osophs.dhhs.gov.
For additional technical assistance, contact the OMH Regional
Minority Health Consultant for your region listed in your grant
application kit.
For health information, call the OMH Resource Center (OMHRC) at 1-
800-444-6472.
Section VIII. Other Information
1. Healthy People 2010
The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the
health promoting and disease prevention objectives of Healthy People
2010, a PHS-led national activity announced in January 2000 to
eliminate health disparities and improve years and quality of life.
More information may be found on the Healthy People 2010 Web site:
https://www.healthypeople.gov and copies of the documents may be
downloaded. Copies of the Healthy People 2010: Volumes I and II can be
purchased by calling (202) 512-1800 (cost $70.00 for printed version;
$20.00 for CD-ROM). Another reference is the Healthy People 2010 Final
Review-2001.
For one free copy of the Healthy People 2010, contact: The National
Center for Health Statistics, Division of Data Services, 3311 Toledo
Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782, or by telephone at (301) 458-4636. Ask for
HHS Publication No. (PHS) 99-1256. This document may also be downloaded
from: https://www.healthypeople.gov.
2. Definitions
For purposes of this announcement, the following definitions apply:
Community-Based Organizations--Private, nonprofit organizations
that are representative of communities or significant segments of
communities where the control and decision making powers are located at
the community level.
Community-Based, Minority-Serving Organization--A community-based
organization that has a history of service to racial/ethnic minority
populations. (See Definition of Minority Populations below.)
Minority Populations--American Indian or Alaska Native; Asian;
Black or African American; Hispanic or Latino; Native Hawaiian or other
Pacific Islander (42 U.S.C. 300u-6, section 1707 of the Public Health
Service Act, as amended)
Nonprofit Organizations--Corporations or associations, no part of
whose net earnings may lawfully inure to the benefit of any private
shareholder or individual. Proof of nonprofit status must be submitted
by private nonprofit organizations with the application or, if
previously filed with PHS, the applicant must state where and when the
proof was submitted.
[[Page 34369]]
Dated: May 26, 2006.
Garth N. Graham,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Minority Health.
[FR Doc. E6-9315 Filed 6-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-29-P